Esa Publications
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Crew Autonomy for Deep Space Exploration: Lessons from the Antarctic Search for Meteorites
Acta Astronautica 94 (2014) 83–92 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro Crew autonomy for deep space exploration: Lessons from the Antarctic Search for Meteorites Stanley G. Love a,n, Ralph P. Harvey b a NASA Johnson Space Center, Mail Code CB, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, TX 77058, USA b Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, 112A. W. Smith Building, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA article info abstract Article history: Future piloted missions to explore asteroids, Mars, and other targets beyond the Moon Received 1 May 2013 will experience strict limitations on communication between vehicles in space and control Received in revised form centers on Earth. These limitations will require crews to operate with greater autonomy 20 June 2013 than any past space mission has demonstrated. The Antarctic Search for Meteorites Accepted 4 August 2013 (ANSMET) project, which regularly sends small teams of researchers to remote parts of the Available online 12 August 2013 southern continent, resembles a space mission in many ways but does not rely upon a control center. It provides a useful crew autonomy model for planners of future deep space exploration missions. In contrast to current space missions, ANSMET gives the crew Keywords: Human space flight the authority to adjust competing work priorities, task assignments, and daily schedules; Crew autonomy allows the crew to be the primary monitor of mission progress; demands greater crew Human exploration accountability for operational errors; requires the crew to make the most of limited Deep space exploration communication bandwidth; adopts systems designed for simple operation and failure Space flight analog recovery; and grants the crew a leading role in the selection and stowage of their Antarctica equipment. -
CZ-Space Day Intro
16.7.2010 ESA TECHNOLOGY → PROGRAMMES AND STRATEGY Czech Space Technology Day - GSTP July 2010 CONTENTS • The European Space Agency -ESA • Space Technology • ESA’s Technology Programmes • Doing business with ESA • ESA’s Long Term Plan 2 1 16.7.2010 → THE EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY PURPOSE OF ESA “To provide for and promote, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European states in space research and technology and their space applications. ” - Article 2 of ESA Convention 4 2 16.7.2010 ESA FACTS AND FIGURES • Over 30 years of experience • 18 Member States • Five establishments, about 2000 staff • 3.7 billion Euro budget (2010) • Over 60 satellites designed, tested and operated in flight • 17 scientific satellites in operation • Five types of launcher developed • Over 190 launches 5 18 MEMBER STATES Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Canada takes part in some programmes under a Cooperation Agreement. Hungary, Romania, Poland, Slovenia, and Estonia are European Cooperating States. Cyprus and Latvia have signed Cooperation Agreements with ESA. 6 3 16.7.2010 ACTIVITIES ESA is one of the few space agencies in the world to combine responsibility in nearly all areas of space activity. • Space science • Navigation • Human spaceflight • Telecommunications • Exploration • Technology • Earth observation • Operations • Launchers 7 ESA PROGRAMMES All Member States participate (on In addition, -
ACT-RPR-SPS-1110 Sps Europe Paper
62nd International Astronautical Congress, Cape Town, SA. Copyright ©2011 by the European Space Agency (ESA). Published by the IAF, with permission and released to the IAF to publish in all forms. IAC-11-C3.1.3 PROSPECTS FOR SPACE SOLAR POWER IN EUROPE Leopold Summerer European Space Agency, Advanced Concepts Team, The Netherlands, [email protected] Lionel Jacques European Space Agency, Advanced Concepts Team, The Netherlands, [email protected] In 2002, a phased, multi-year approach to space solar power has been published. Following this plan, several activities have matured the concept and technology further in the following years. Despite substantial advances in key technologies, space solar power remains still at the weak intersections between the space sector and the energy sector. In the 10 years since the development of the European SPS Programme Plan, both, the space and the energy sectors have undergone substantial changes and many key enabling technologies for space solar power have advanced significantly. The present paper attempts to take account of these changes in view to assess how they influence the prospect for space solar power work for Europe. Fresh Look Study as well as the work on a European I INTRODUCTION sail tower concept by Klimke and Seboldt [16], [17]. Based on these results, which re-confirmed the The concept of generating solar power in space and principal technical viability of space solar power transmitting it to Earth to contribute to terrestrial energy concepts, the focus of the first phase of the European systems has received period attention since P. Glaser SPS programme plan has been to enlarge the evaluation published the first engineering approach to it in 1968 scope of space solar power by including expertise from [1]. -
→ Space for Europe European Space Agency
number 153 | February 2013 bulletin → space for europe European Space Agency The European Space Agency was formed out of, and took over the rights and The ESA headquarters are in Paris. obligations of, the two earlier European space organisations – the European Space Research Organisation (ESRO) and the European Launcher Development The major establishments of ESA are: Organisation (ELDO). The Member States are Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands. Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Canada is a Cooperating State. ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany. In the words of its Convention: the purpose of the Agency shall be to provide for ESRIN, Frascati, Italy. and to promote, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European States in space research and technology and their space applications, with a view ESAC, Madrid, Spain. to their being used for scientific purposes and for operational space applications systems: Chairman of the Council: D. Williams (to Dec 2012) → by elaborating and implementing a long-term European space policy, by recommending space objectives to the Member States, and by concerting the Director General: J.-J. Dordain policies of the Member States with respect to other national and international organisations and institutions; → by elaborating and implementing activities and programmes in the space field; → by coordinating the European space programme and national programmes, and by integrating the latter progressively and as completely as possible into the European space programme, in particular as regards the development of applications satellites; → by elaborating and implementing the industrial policy appropriate to its programme and by recommending a coherent industrial policy to the Member States. -
STS-134 Press
CONTENTS Section Page STS-134 MISSION OVERVIEW ................................................................................................ 1 STS-134 TIMELINE OVERVIEW ............................................................................................... 9 MISSION PROFILE ................................................................................................................... 11 MISSION OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 13 MISSION PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................. 15 STS-134 ENDEAVOUR CREW .................................................................................................. 17 PAYLOAD OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 25 ALPHA MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER-2 .................................................................................................. 25 EXPRESS LOGISTICS CARRIER 3 ......................................................................................................... 31 RENDEZVOUS & DOCKING ....................................................................................................... 43 UNDOCKING, SEPARATION AND DEPARTURE ....................................................................................... 44 SPACEWALKS ........................................................................................................................ -
SPACE for LIFE Human Spaceflight Science Newsletter July 2011
→ SPACE FOR LIFE human spaceflight science newsletter July 2011 In this issue: - ISS Science Incr. 27 end - MASER 12 in preparation - Partial-g Parabolic Flight - Mars500 one year on - Concordia Antarctica - Climate change AO - Kuipers preparing mission - Upcoming topics For full resolution of images use electronic pdf version NASA Space Shuttle STS-134 Endeavour as the last Shuttle mission with an ESA astronaut, Roberto Vittori onboard. STS-135 Atlantis closes the Shuttle era with its 8 July launch. Courtesy of NASA. Paolo Nespoli's MagISStra mission has come to an end, Roberto Vittori (ESA/ASI) has accompanied the AMS into its location on ISS Paolo nespoli touched down in Kazakhstan, together with his crew mates NASA astronaut Cady Coleman and Russian Space Agency cosmonaut Dmitry Kondratyev in their Soyuz capsule, on 23 May after a bit more than 5 months onboard the ISS, after an eventful science mission and more images of Earth taken than by any earlier ESA astronaut. ESA’s Roberto Vittori was visiting with NASA’s Space Shuttle Endeavour and the largest ISS payload ever. The Shuttle era has come to an end with the landing of STS-135 Atlantis in Florida, USA, on 21 July 2011. Paolo Nespoli started his 5 months Physical Sciences activities - last 2 months mission to the ISS mid December 2010 and concluded it with a smooth land- GeoFlow-2 experiment ing on 23 May 2011. Behind him Nespoli The GeoFlow-2 experiment, a simulation model of the left a very well done and productive movements of fluid magma near and in the crust of the job, in many cases yielding more than Earth, was under some time pressure, as the last manda- what had been expected, and not the tory run would have to be performed in time before the least producing a host of Earth images Fluid Science Lab (FSL) Video Monitoring Unit would have taken from the ISS. -
Half-Year Financial Report at 30 June 2013 Finmeccanica
HALF-YEAR FINANCIAL REPORT AT 30 JUNE 2013 FINMECCANICA Disclaimer This Half-Year Financial Report at 30 June 2013 has been translated into English solely for the convenience of the international reader. In the event of conflict or inconsistency between the terms used in the Italian version of the report and the English version, the Italian version shall prevail, as the Italian version constitutes the sole official document. CONTENTS BOARDS AND COMMITTEES ...................................................................................................... 4 REPORT ON OPERATIONS AT 30 JUNE 2013 .......................................................................... 5 Group results and financial position in the first half of 2013 .................................................................. 5 Outlook ................................................................................................................................................. 12 “Non-GAAP” alternative performance indicators ................................................................................. 22 Industrial and financial transactions ...................................................................................................... 26 Corporate Governance .......................................................................................................................... 29 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED HALF-YEAR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT 30 JUNE 2013 .................................................................................................................................................. -
Relazione Finanziaria Semestrale Al 30 Giugno 2016
RELAZIONE FINANZIARIA SEMESTRALE AL 30 GIUGNO 2016 Relazione finanziaria semestrale al 30 giugno 2016 INDICE ORGANI SOCIALI E COMITATI ................................................................................................. 4 RELAZIONE SULL’ANDAMENTO DELLA GESTIONE AL 30 GIUGNO 2016 ................... 5 Risultati del Gruppo e situazione finanziaria .......................................................................................... 5 Outlook .................................................................................................................................................. 15 Operazioni industriali e finanziarie ....................................................................................................... 16 Operazioni con parti correlate ............................................................................................................... 18 Indicatori di performance “non-GAAP” ............................................................................................... 19 BILANCIO CONSOLIDATO SEMESTRALE ABBREVIATO AL 30 GIUGNO 2016.......... 22 Conto economico abbreviato separato consolidato ............................................................................... 23 Conto economico abbreviato complessivo consolidato......................................................................... 24 Situazione patrimoniale finanziaria abbreviata consolidata .................................................................. 25 Rendiconto finanziario abbreviato consolidato .................................................................................... -
Human Spaceflight in Social Media: Promoting Space Exploration Through Twitter
Human Spaceflight in Social Media: Promoting Space Exploration Through Twitter Pierre J. Bertrand,1 Savannah L. Niles,2 and Dava J. Newman1,3 turn back now would be to deny our history, our capabilities,’’ said James Michener.1 The aerospace industry has successfully 1 Man-Vehicle Laboratory, Department of Aeronautics and Astro- commercialized Earth applications for space technologies, but nautics; 2Media Lab, Department of Media Arts and Sciences; and 3 human space exploration seems to lack support from both fi- Department of Engineering Systems, Massachusetts Institute of nancial and human public interest perspectives. Space agencies Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. no longer enjoy the political support and public enthusiasm that historically drove the human spaceflight programs. If one uses ABSTRACT constant year dollars, the $16B National Aeronautics and While space-based technologies for Earth applications are flourish- Space Administration (NASA) budget dedicated for human ing, space exploration activities suffer from a lack of public aware- spaceflight in the Apollo era has fallen to $7.9B in 2014, of ness as well as decreasing budgets. However, space exploration which 41% is dedicated to operations covering the Internati- benefits are numerous and include significant science, technological onal Space Station (ISS), the Space Launch System (SLS) and development, socioeconomic benefits, education, and leadership Orion, and commercial crew programs.2 The European Space contributions. Recent robotic exploration missions have -
Finmeccanica 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements
FINMECCANICA 2009 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Disclaimer This Annual Report 2009 has been translated into English solely for the convenience of the international reader. In the event of conflict or inconsintency between the terms used in the Italian version of the report and the English version, the Italian version shall prevail, as the Italian version constitutes the official document. WorldReginfo - 3452d26b-cc32-4c0c-b20e-c4d9fb240864 CONTENTS Boards and Committees ................................................................................................................................ 6 REPORT ON OPERATIONS AT 31 DECEMBER 2009 ........................................................................... 7 The results and financial position of the Group ........................................................................................ 7 “Non-GAAP” performance indicators .................................................................................................... 24 Operations with related parties ............................................................................................................... 29 Performance by division ......................................................................................................................... 32 HELICOPTERS ............................................................................................................................ 32 DEFENCE ELECTRONICS AND SECURITY ............................................................................. 38 AERONAUTICS -
Cluster Keeping Algorithms for the Satellite Swarm Sensor Network Project
5th Federated and Fractionated Satellite Systems Workshop November 2-3, 2017, ISAE SUPAERO – Toulouse, France Cluster Keeping Algorithms for the Satellite Swarm Sensor Network Project Eviatar Edlerman and Pini Gurfil Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract This paper develops cluster control algorithms for the Satellite Swarm Sensor Network (S3Net) project, whose main aim is to enable fractionation of space-based remote sensing, imaging, and observation satellites. A methodological development of orbit control algorithms is provided, supporting the various use cases of the mission. Emphasis is given on outlining the algorithms structure, information flow, and software implementation. The methodology presented herein enables operation of multiple satellites in coordination, to enable fractionation of space sensors and augmentation of data provided therefrom. 1. INTRODUCTION In the field of earth observation from space, modern approaches show a trend of moving away from the classical single satellite missions, where one satellite includes a complete set of sensors and instruments, towards fractionated and distributed sensor missions, where multiple satellites, possibly carrying different types of sensors, act in a formation or swarm. Such missions promise an increase of imaging quality, an increase of service quality and, in many cases, a decrease of deployment costs for satellites that can become smaller and less complex due to mission requirements. Need for incremental deployment can be caused by funding limitations or issues. Although a combination of funds from different interest groups is possible, it can be difficult to achieve. A higher degree of independence for service providers can be enabled through lower cost satellites that allow integration into satellite swarms. -
→ Space for Europe European Space Agency
number 149 | February 2012 bulletin → space for europe European Space Agency The European Space Agency was formed out of, and took over the rights and The ESA headquarters are in Paris. obligations of, the two earlier European space organisations – the European Space Research Organisation (ESRO) and the European Launcher Development The major establishments of ESA are: Organisation (ELDO). The Member States are Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands. Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Canada is a Cooperating State. ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany. In the words of its Convention: the purpose of the Agency shall be to provide for ESRIN, Frascati, Italy. and to promote, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European States in space research and technology and their space applications, with a view ESAC, Madrid, Spain. to their being used for scientific purposes and for operational space applications systems: Chairman of the Council: D. Williams → by elaborating and implementing a long-term European space policy, by Director General: J.-J. Dordain recommending space objectives to the Member States, and by concerting the policies of the Member States with respect to other national and international organisations and institutions; → by elaborating and implementing activities and programmes in the space field; → by coordinating the European space programme and national programmes, and by integrating the latter progressively and as completely as possible into the European space programme, in particular as regards the development of applications satellites; → by elaborating and implementing the industrial policy appropriate to its programme and by recommending a coherent industrial policy to the Member States.