The Caribbean | Hurricane ELSA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Emergency Response Coordination Centre (ERCC) – DG ECHO Daily Map | 02/07/2021 The Caribbean | Hurricane ELSA Uncertainty cone THE BAHAMAS 7 Jul ATLANTIC TURKS AND 6 Jul CAICOS (UK) OCEAN ATLANTIC 4 Jul OCEAN CUBA Caribbean 2 Jul DOMINICAN Sea REPUBLIC HAITI Puerto Rico Virgin Anguilla Saint Martin (FRANCE) (USA) Islands (UK) Sint Maarten (NETHERLANDS) 30 Jun Saint Barthélemy (FRANCE) ANTIGUA AND Guadaloupe ST. KITTS Past rainfall BARBUDA (FRANCE) AND NEVIS Leeward accumulation (mm) 25 Jun – 1 Jul 1 L e s s e r Monserrat (UK) Islands Source: NASA-GPM DOMINICA 4 Jul 6:00 UTC 50-100 111 km/h sust. winds Guadaloupe Caribbean Sea 10-50 A n t i l l e s (FRANCE) Martinique (FRANCE) DOMINICA 2 Jul 12:30 UTC 1 120 km/h sust. winds 2 Jul ST. LUCIA 12:30 UTC 3 Jul 18:00 UTC GDACS Orange alert 120 km/h sust. winds Martinique BARBADOS (FRANCE) ST. VINCENT AND ST. LUCIA THE GRENADINES ! 3 Jul 6:00 UTC 1 120 km/h sust. winds BARBADOS 2 Jul GRENADA 9:00 UTC Caribbean Aruba 2 Jul 18:00 UTC 1 (NETHERLANDS) 120 km/h sust. winds Tropical Cyclone (TC) Rainfall forecast (mm) Bonaire ST. VINCENT Sea ! Source: GDACS, NOAA 2-6 Jul (NETHERLANDS) AND THE GRENADINES Source: NOAA-HWRF Windward Current position 300-600 Curaçao Forecast track 100-300 (NETHERLANDS) Islands GRENADA Past track 50-100 Leeward Antilles Intensity Tobago 10-50 ≥ 119 km/h Storm surge TRINIDAD Ï Hurricane 2-4 Jul COLOMBIA Margarita AND TOBAGO Source: JRC, atm. NOAA-HWRF Island 63-118 km/h Gulf of Ï Tropical storm < 1 m Paria Trinidad D < 63 km/h ! Suspension of national 2 Jul 9:00 UTC Tropical depression activities © European Union, 2021. Map produced 93 km/h sust. winds Source: NEMO by the JRC. The boundaries and the Wind buffer names shown on this map do not imply VENEZUELA 2-4 Jul Source: GDACS, JRC Community advisory official endorsement or acceptance by the Source: NOAA European Union. ≥ 119 km/h Hurricane Tropical storm 63-118 km/h warning warning.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Eye of the Wind Segeltoern
Fri 02 March 2018 - Tue 13 March 2018 Since the time of Christopher Columbus, the Bermuda Triangle – the mysterious region in the Atlantic Ocean between Miami, Puerto Rico and Bermuda – has been the subject of 'sailor's yarn', which sometimes tells stories of ships and planes that have disappeared without a trace, and of alleged hauntings or inexplicable natural phenomena. However, maritime superstition is not in our luggage on this crossing, as the Eye of the Wind will not be sailing into the legendary triangle, but instead only into the northern boundary point – the dreamlike Bermuda archipelago. This is where you will go on board: Marina Fort Louis, Marigot / Saint Martin The Princess Juliana international airport is located in the Dutch southern half of the twin island of Sint Maarten / Saint Martin and is easily reached from many major airports. A unique attraction worth seeing is immediately visible on anchoring at the Caribbean island paradise: on the nearby Maho Beach, the distance between landing airplanes and beach-goers' heads (or the masts of the boats anchored there) is often only a few metres. On a chalkboard attached to a surfboard, the arrival times of the largest planes are announced for hobby photographers every day. You can reach Marigot by taxi or minibus with a short drive. By the way, the EURO is the official currency in the French part of Saint Martin. Take advantage of your stay for a relaxing day at the breathtaking Dawn Beach. Our tip: Saint Martin is considered the 'culinary capital of the Caribbean' – do not miss the local specialties made from the guava fruit.
[Show full text]
'Good Governance' in the Dutch Caribbean
Obstacles to ‘Good Governance’ in the Dutch Caribbean Colonial- and Postcolonial Development in Aruba and Sint Maarten Arxen A. Alders Master Thesis 2015 [email protected] Politics and Society in Historical Perspective Department of History Utrecht University University Supervisor: Dr. Auke Rijpma Internship (BZK/KR) Supervisor: Nol Hendriks Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2 1. Background ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 From Colony to Autonomy ......................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Status Quaestionis .................................................................................................................... 11 Colonial history .............................................................................................................................. 12 Smallness ....................................................................................................................................... 16 2. Adapting Concepts to Context ................................................................................................. 19 2.1 Good Governance ..................................................................................................................... 19 Development in a Small Island Context ........................................................................................
[Show full text]
Ix Viii the World by Income
The world by income Classified according to World Bank estimates of 2016 GNI per capita (current US dollars,Atlas method) Low income (less than $1,005) Greenland (Den.) Lower middle income ($1,006–$3,955) Upper middle income ($3,956–$12,235) Faroe Russian Federation Iceland Islands High income (more than $12,235) (Den.) Finland Norway Sweden No data Canada Netherlands Estonia Isle of Man (U.K.) Russian Latvia Denmark Fed. Lithuania Ireland U.K. Germany Poland Belarus Belgium Channel Islands (U.K.) Ukraine Kazakhstan Mongolia Luxembourg France Moldova Switzerland Romania Uzbekistan Dem.People’s Liechtenstein Bulgaria Georgia Kyrgyz Rep.of Korea United States Azer- Rep. Spain Monaco Armenia Japan Portugal Greece baijan Turkmenistan Tajikistan Rep.of Andorra Turkey Korea Gibraltar (U.K.) Syrian China Malta Cyprus Arab Afghanistan Tunisia Lebanon Rep. Iraq Islamic Rep. Bermuda Morocco Israel of Iran (U.K.) West Bank and Gaza Jordan Bhutan Kuwait Pakistan Nepal Algeria Libya Arab Rep. Bahrain The Bahamas Western Saudi Qatar Cayman Is. (U.K.) of Egypt Bangladesh Sahara Arabia United Arab India Hong Kong, SAR Cuba Turks and Caicos Is. (U.K.) Emirates Myanmar Mexico Lao Macao, SAR Haiti Cabo Mauritania Oman P.D.R. N. Mariana Islands (U.S.) Belize Jamaica Verde Mali Niger Thailand Vietnam Guatemala Honduras Senegal Chad Sudan Eritrea Rep. of Guam (U.S.) Yemen El Salvador The Burkina Cambodia Philippines Marshall Nicaragua Gambia Faso Djibouti Federated States Islands Guinea Benin Costa Rica Guyana Guinea- Brunei of Micronesia Bissau Ghana Nigeria Central Ethiopia Sri R.B. de Suriname Côte South Darussalam Panama Venezuela Sierra d’Ivoire African Lanka French Guiana (Fr.) Cameroon Republic Sudan Somalia Palau Colombia Leone Togo Malaysia Liberia Maldives Equatorial Guinea Uganda São Tomé and Príncipe Rep.
[Show full text]
The Value of Nature in the Caribbean Netherlands
The Economics of Ecosystems The value of nature and Biodiversity in the Caribbean Netherlands in the Caribbean Netherlands 2 Total Economic Value in the Caribbean Netherlands The value of nature in the Caribbean Netherlands The Challenge Healthy ecosystems such as the forests on the hillsides of the Quill on St Eustatius and Saba’s Mt Scenery or the corals reefs of Bonaire are critical to the society of the Caribbean Netherlands. In the last decades, various local and global developments have resulted in serious threats to these fragile ecosystems, thereby jeopardizing the foundations of the islands’ economies. To make well-founded decisions that protect the natural environment on these beautiful tropical islands against the looming threats, it is crucial to understand how nature contributes to the economy and wellbeing in the Caribbean Netherlands. This study aims to determine the economic value and the societal importance of the main ecosystem services provided by the natural capital of Bonaire, St Eustatius and Saba. The challenge of this project is to deliver insights that support decision-makers in the long-term management of the islands’ economies and natural environment. Overview Caribbean Netherlands The Caribbean Netherlands consist of three islands, Bonaire, St Eustatius and Saba all located in the Caribbean Sea. Since 2010 each island is part of the Netherlands as a public entity. Bonaire is the largest island with 16,000 permanent residents, while only 4,000 people live in St Eustatius and approximately 2,000 in Saba. The total population of the Caribbean Netherlands is 22,000. All three islands are surrounded by living coral reefs and therefore attract many divers and snorkelers.
[Show full text]
Snapshot of American in the Caribbean, the Bahamas and Bermuda 01 Network
Snapshot of American in the Caribbean, the Bahamas and Bermuda 01 Network American flies more than 170 daily flights to 38 destinations in the Caribbean, the Bahamas and Bermuda from seven U.S. hub airports, as well as from Boston (BOS) and Fort Lauderdale (FLL). Freeport, Bahamas (FPO) Year-round Seasonal Both Year-round: MIA Seasonal: CLT Marsh Harbour, Bahamas (MHH) Seasonal: CLT, MIA Bermuda (BDA) Year-round: JFK, PHL Eleuthera, Bahamas (ELH) Seasonal: CLT, MIA George Town/Exuma, Bahamas (GGT) Year-round: MIA Seasonal: CLT Santiago de Cuba (SCU) Year-round: MIA (Coming May 3, 2019) Providenciales, Turks & Caicos (PLS) Year-round: CLT, MIA Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic (POP) Year-round: MIA Santiago, Dominican Republic (STI) Year-round: MIA Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (SDQ) Nassau, Bahamas (NAS) Year-round: MIA Year-round: CLT, MIA, ORD Punta Cana, Dominican Republic (PUJ) Seasonal: DCA, DFW, LGA, PHL Year-round: BOS, CLT, DFW, MIA, ORD, PHL Seasonal: JFK Grand Cayman (GCM) Year-round: CLT, MIA San Juan, Puerto Rico (SJU) Year-round: CLT, MIA, ORD, PHL St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands (STT) Year-round: CLT, MIA, SJU Seasonal: JFK, PHL St. Croix, US Virgin Islands (STX) Havana, Cuba (HAV) Year-round: MIA Year-round: CLT, MIA Seasonal: CLT Holguin, Cuba (HOG) St. Maarten (SXM) Year-round: MIA Year-round: CLT, MIA, PHL Varadero, Cuba (VRA) Seasonal: JFK Year-round: MIA Cap-Haïtien, Haiti (CAP) St. Kitts (SKB) Santa Clara, Cuba (SNU) Year-round: MIA Year-round: MIA Year-round: MIA Seasonal: CLT, JFK Pointe-a-Pitre, Guadeloupe (PTP) Camagey, Cuba (CMW) Seasonal: MIA Antigua (ANU) Year-round: MIA Year-round: MIA Fort-de-France, Martinique (FDF) Year-round: MIA St.
[Show full text]
Sint Maarten
Sint Maarten Country Cooperation Strategy 2015 – 2019 29/07/2015 1 Abbreviations ART Antiretroviral therapy treatment AVBZ General Act on Special Medical Expenses AWW General Widowers and Orphans Insurance Act CARICOM Caribbean Community and Common Market CCS Country Cooperation Strategy Cessantia Severance Pay Insurance Act CT Computed Tomography EVT Economic Affairs, Transportation and Telecommunication FZOG Governmental Health Insurance Fund GDP Gross Domestic Product Gov APS General Pension Fund Sint Maarten GP General Practitioner HIS Health Information System HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus HPV Human Papilloma Virus IMF International Monetary Fund MDGs Millennium Development Goals Min VSA Ministry of Public Health, Social Development and Labor MSGs Millennium Social Goals NAf Netherlands Antilles Florin-Guilder NHA National Health Authority OV Accident Insurance PAHO/WHO Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization PPP Power Parity Ratio RX Radiography SLS Sint Maarten Laboratory Services SMMC Sint Maarten Medical Center SZV Social and Health Insurance UNDP United Nations Development Program UNICEF United Nations Children Fund USD United States Dollar ZV Sickness Benefits Insurance 2 Table of contents Executive Summary ___________________________________________________________ 4 1-Introduction ________________________________________________________________ 5 2-Health Development Situation _________________________________________________ 6 2.1 Main Health Achievements and Challenges __________________________________________
[Show full text]
St. Lucia Earns Junior Chef Award at Taste Of
MEDIA CONTACTS: KTCpr Theresa M. Oakes / [email protected] Leigh-Mary Hoffmann / [email protected] Telephone: 516-594-4100 #1101 **high resolution images available** BAHAMAS WINS TEAM, BARTENDER, PASTRY TOP HONORS; PUERTO RICO TAKES CHEF CATEGORY; ST. LUCIA EARNS JUNIOR CHEF AWARD AT TASTE OF THE CARIBBEAN 2015 MIAMI, FL (June 15, 2015) – The Bahamas National Culinary Team won three of the five top categories at the Taste of the Caribbean culinary competition this past weekend earning honors as Caribbean National Team of the Year and individual honors to Marv Cunningham, Bahamas for Caribbean Bartender of the Year and four-time winner Sheldon Tracey Sweeting, Bahamas, for Caribbean Pastry Chef of the Year. Jonathan Hernandez, Puerto Rico was crowned Caribbean Chef of the Year and Edna Butcher, St. Lucia, was named Caribbean Junior Chef of the Year. "Congratulations to all of the Taste of the Caribbean participants, their national hotel associations, team managers and sponsors for developing 10 Caribbean national culinary teams to compete at our annual culinary event," said Frank Comito, director general and CEO of the Caribbean Hotel and Tourism Association (CHTA). "Your commitment to culinary excellence in our region is very much appreciated as we showcase the region’s culinary and beverage offerings. Congratulations to all of the winners for a job well-done," Comito added. Presented by CHTA, Taste of the Caribbean featured cooking and bartending competitions between 10 Caribbean culinary teams from Anguilla, Bahamas, Barbados, Bonaire, British Virgin Islands, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, St. Lucia, Suriname and the U.S. Virgin Islands with the winners being named the "best of the best" throughout the region.
[Show full text]
Madrid Protocol • Has 101 Members, Covering 117 Countries
Madrid System & Caribbean Overseas Territories Abraham Thoppil (Cayman Islands) 20 May 2018 1 Who can use the Madrid System? • Need personal or business connection to a “Contracting Member State” – domiciled in or have commercial establishment in, or be a citizen of one of the 117 countries. Contacting Member State = Office of Origin Members of Madrid Union: • Contracting parties of (i) Madrid Agreement (ii) Madrid Protocol • has 101 members, covering 117 countries 2 A State or intergovernmental organisation (IGO) can accede to the Madrid Protocol IGO • European Union • African Intellectual Property Organisation. CARICOM is eligible Parties to Madrid Protocol in the Caribbean • Antigua and Barbuda • Cuba • Curaçao, Sint Maarten, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba • Guadeloupe, Martinique, Saint Martin and Saint Barthélemy 3 Status of Territories The Kingdom of the Netherlands: • The Netherlands • Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba – Madrid Protocol applies • Aruba • Member of Madrid Agreement, but not Madrid Protocol • Curaçao – Madrid Protocol applies • Sint Maarten – Madrid Protocol applies France: - Accession to Madrid Protocol included all Overseas Departments and Territories • Guadeloupe • Martinique • Saint-Barthélemy • Saint Martin • French Guiana. 4 Status of Territories UK British Overseas Territories – None of them are parties to the Madrid Protocol • Caribbean BOTs – Anguilla – Bermuda – British Virgin Islands – Cayman Islands – Montserrat – Turks and Caicos Islands UK Crown Dependencies – Guernsey – Jersey – Isle of Man – Madrid Protocol applies 5 Madrid Protocol Accession - protocols http://www.wipo.int/madrid/en/future-members/accession-guide/ 6 Advantages of Accession by Territories to Madrid Protocol • Financial Services – a major part of economy for most Territories • Attract IPHoldCo’s to jurisdiction – IP HoldCo’s in Contracting Member States will be able to be proprietor of Madrid Protocol IRs issued by other States • With accession the Territories are on the same footing as mother country.
[Show full text]
Hurricane Irma
Information Bulletin Americas: Hurricane Irma Information Bulletin no. 4 Date of issue: 11 September 2017 Point of contact: Felipe Del Cid, Disaster and Crisis Department Period covered by this bulletin: 9– Continental Operations Coordinator, email: [email protected] 11 September 2017 Red Cross Movement actors currently involved in the operation: The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), American Red Cross, Antigua and Barbuda Red Cross, British Red Cross overseas branches, Bahamas Red Cross Society, Canadian Red Cross Society, Cuban Red Cross, Dominican Red Cross Society, French Red Cross-PIRAC (Regional Intervention Platform for the Americas and the Caribbean), Haiti Red Cross Society, Italian Red Cross, Netherlands Red Cross overseas branches, Norwegian Red Cross, Saint Kitts and Nevis Red Cross Society, Spanish Red Cross, Swiss Red Cross, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). N° of other partner organizations involved in the operation: Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA), United Nations system agencies (UNICEF, WFP, FAO, OCHA, IOM), DG-ECHO, Pan American Health Organization [PAHO], government of affected countries, USAID/OFDA, DFID, among others. This bulletin is being issued for information only; it reflects the current situation and details available at this time. Information bulletins no.1, 2 and 3 are available here. The Situation On 11 September, the centre of Tropical Storm Irma was located near latitude 30.3 North, longitude 83.1 West at 11:00 EDT. The centre of Irma is in southwestern Georgia at present. On the forecast track, it will move into eastern Alabama Tuesday morning. After its passage through Cuba on 9 September, Irma severely impacted northern and central Cuba, causing coastal and river flooding.
[Show full text]
The European Union, Its Overseas Territories and Non-Proliferation: the Case of Arctic Yellowcake
eU NoN-ProliferatioN CoNsortiUm The European network of independent non-proliferation think tanks NoN-ProliferatioN PaPers No. 25 January 2013 THE EUROPEAN UNION, ITS OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AND NON-PROLIFERATION: THE CASE OF ARCTIC YELLOWCAKE cindy vestergaard I. INTRODUCTION SUMMARY There are 26 countries and territories—mainly The European Union (EU) Strategy against Proliferation of small islands—outside of mainland Europe that Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD Strategy) has been have constitutional ties with a European Union applied unevenly across EU third-party arrangements, (EU) member state—either Denmark, France, the hampering the EU’s ability to mainstream its non- proliferation policies within and outside of its borders. Netherlands or the United Kingdom.1 Historically, This inconsistency is visible in the EU’s current approach since the establishment of the Communities in 1957, to modernizing the framework for association with its the EU’s relations with these overseas countries and overseas countries and territories (OCTs). territories (OCTs) have focused on classic development The EU–OCT relationship is shifting as these islands needs. However, the approach has been changing over grapple with climate change and a drive toward sustainable the past decade to a principle of partnership focused and inclusive development within a globalized economy. on sustainable development and global issues such While they are not considered islands of proliferation as poverty eradication, climate change, democracy, concern, effective non-proliferation has yet to make it to human rights and good governance. Nevertheless, their shores. Including EU non-proliferation principles is this new and enhanced partnership has yet to address therefore a necessary component of modernizing the EU– the EU’s non-proliferation principles and objectives OCT relationship.
[Show full text]
The EU and Its Overseas Entities Joining Forces on Biodiversity and Climate Change
BEST The EU and its overseas entities Joining forces on biodiversity and climate change Photo 1 4.2” x 10.31” Position x: 8.74”, y: .18” Azores St-Martin Madeira St-Barth. Guadeloupe Canary islands Martinique French Guiana Reunion Outermost Regions (ORs) Azores Madeira French Guadeloupe Canary Guiana Martinique islands Reunion Azores St-Martin Madeira St-Barth. Guadeloupe Canary islands Martinique French Guiana Reunion Outermost Regions (ORs) Azores St-Martin Madeira St-Barth. Guadeloupe Canary islands Martinique French Guiana Reunion Outermost Regions (ORs) Anguilla British Virgin Is. Turks & Caïcos Caïman Islands Montserrat Sint-Marteen Sint-Eustatius Greenland Saba St Pierre & Miquelon Azores Aruba Wallis Bonaire French & Futuna Caraçao Ascension Polynesia Mayotte BIOT (British Indian Ocean Ter.) St Helena Scattered New Islands Caledonia Pitcairn Tristan da Cunha Amsterdam St-Paul South Georgia Crozet Islands TAAF (Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises) Iles Sandwich Falklands Kerguelen (Islas Malvinas) BAT (British Antarctic Territory) Adélie Land Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) Anguilla The EU overseas dimension British Virgin Is. Turks & Caïcos Caïman Islands Montserrat Sint-Marteen Sint-Eustatius Greenland Saba St Pierre & Miquelon Azores St-Martin Madeira St-Barth. Guadeloupe Canary islands Martinique Aruba French Guiana Wallis Bonaire French & Futuna Caraçao Ascension Polynesia Mayotte BIOT (British Indian Ocean Ter.) St Helena Reunion Scattered New Islands Caledonia Pitcairn Tristan da Cunha Amsterdam St-Paul South Georgia Crozet Islands TAAF (Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises) Iles Sandwich Falklands Kerguelen (Islas Malvinas) BAT (British Antarctic Territory) Adélie Land ORs OCTs Anguilla The EU overseas dimension British Virgin Is. A major potential for cooperation on climate change and biodiversity Turks & Caïcos Caïman Islands Montserrat Sint-Marteen Sint-Eustatius Greenland Saba St Pierre & Miquelon Azores St-Martin Madeira St-Barth.
[Show full text]
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, Saba and the European Netherlands Conclusions
JOINED TOGETHER FOR FIVE YEARS BONAIRE, SINT EUSTATIUS, SABA AND THE EUROPEAN NETHERLANDS CONCLUSIONS Preface On 10 October 2010, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba each became a public entitie within the Kingdom of the Netherlands. In the run-up to this transition, it was agreed to evaluate the results of the new political structure after five years. Expectations were high at the start of the political change. Various objectives have been achieved in these past five years. The levels of health care and education have improved significantly. But there is a lot that is still disappointing. Not all expectations people had on 10 October 2010 have been met. The 'Committee for the evaluation of the constitutional structure of the Caribbean Netherlands' is aware that people have different expectations of the evaluation. There is some level of scepticism. Some people assume that the results of the evaluation will lead to yet another report, which will not have a considerable contribution to the, in their eyes, necessary change. Other people's expectations of the evaluation are high and they expect the results of the evaluation to lead to a new moment or a relaunch for further agreements that will mark the beginning of necessary changes. In any case, five years is too short a period to be able to give a final assessment of the new political structure. However, five years is an opportune period of time to be able to take stock of the situation and identify successes and elements that need improving. Add to this the fact that the results of the evaluation have been repeatedly identified as the cause for making new agreements.
[Show full text]