New Archaeology 7

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Archaeology 7 inside this issue: Archaeology YATE COURT VICTIM OF WAR? Issue 8 December 2004 Under New Management! outh Gloucestershire Council no longer has an archaeological promotion officer, Richard Osgood has joined a different team, the Mod’s Conservation group on SSalisbury plain. However SGC is committed to continuing to produce two issues of Archaeology per year. A rather slimmer version for this issue but we may be back to full size next year. Your new editor is David Evans. I considered changing the name. What do you think? Archaeology seems too restricted for what we cover, a flint flake to the Second Severn Crossing but, for now, it remains Archaeology. Ram Hill Colliery, Rediscovery, Rescue and Revelation. Ram Hill colliery was once the hub of nineteenth century coal mining in Westerleigh parish.It was the terminus of the Dramway, probably the last railway in England designed to use horses of a means of propulsion. Although not totally forgotten, there is no Dating from 1828 just a year before the doubt that neglect had set in. Fortunately Rainhill trials heralded the victory of steam, help was at hand, a Bristol University MA the Dramway as built ended here, and here student, Bridget Hetzel, was looking for a the mystery begins. A number of plans exist project. Ram Hill was suggested and although showing the proposed route of the Dramway initially reluctant she set to it with a will. but none show it ending up at Ram Hill. Why, The results were spectacular, already the site was it an old colliery thought worked out or a has been cleared of undergrowth and we are new site thought to have great potential? well on the way to securing the long-term There are other conundrums connected with management of the site with a plan for the site, which are revealed in a new study. consolidation, presentation and interpretation. The fact that the site survives at all is a serendipity of circumstance. The GWR purchased the area for its new direct route from South Wales to London. In the end the cutting stopped just north of the site but only just. The mine lay forgotten until 1981 when John Cornwell a local archaeologist rediscovered the site. The next stroke of fortune, although not to those involved, was the high level of unemployment in the 1980s, which engendered a number of job creation Before and after schemes. In 1987 a comprehensive program clearance of work was carried out, unfortunately funds ran out and the ambitious scheme was left incomplete. A HALF YEARLY NEWSLETTER PRODUCED BY SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNCIL 1 s Yate Court one of the ruins, that A similar case arises when we look at formal articles by pulling down the walls, bridges and Cromwell knocked about a bit, as goes sieges of castles and towns. At Gloucester houses and ransacking the estate to his own Ithe old music hall song? In this case, for example evidence for the works came profit. perhaps Prince Rupert (Royalist), who is from the correlation of the results of many The current answer to the question was Yate reputed to have destroyed Filton in a fit watching briefs and small scale excavations Court destroyed in the civil war appears to be of pique, or Colonel Massey which revealed mysterious ditches and that we do not know for certain. The (Parliamentarian) are to blame for the destruction levels. The destruction levels evidence for the civil war defences at Acton current state of the site. confirmed that large areas of the suburbs of Court was the almost accidental outcome of Gloucester had been cleared as fields of fire. Although the blame for the study of the Tudor mansion. While Was Yate court destroyed in the war? However, the ditches showed that published the destruction of Yate documentary research may reveal the truth, plans of the defences, which seemed to show Court on the Civil War Although there is little doubt that medieval there is much potential for archaeology to the scheme in place at the time of the siege, appears to date only manor houses and castles were vulnerable to reveal to reveal the secrets of any siege and probably showed a scheme, which was never from the late nineteenth canon fire it is also true that most civil war defence works of the site. A range of implemented. The Gloucester defences were century there is little armies only had light pieces which could techniques ranging from the structured used far weaker than was ever supposed. Likewise doubt that during the inflict only light damage. Indeed often more of metal detectors, examining only the topsoil excavations at the Royal Fort showed that it Civil War the area which effective was the lobbing of mortar shells into to a variety of geo-physical techniques varied considerably from what was expected. including ground-penetrating radar could be Oliver Cromwell has now become South a building, as happened at Lichfield Close in Gloucestershire was a 1643, the resulting explosions causing little Apart from the occasional blockading action used to aid our search, and who knows one troubled territory. Between the end of the damage but terrorising the occupants into where the besiegers were not strong enough day the siege of Filton could become as well siege of Gloucester (September 1643), surrender. Where siege cannon was used the to take a fortified place, few battles lasted known as Concorde. perhaps the turning point of the English Civil results could be devastating as for example at more than a few hours or sieges more than a War, and the capture of Bristol by Colonel Nunney Castle. Much of the destruction of few weeks. In the core areas controlled by Fairfax (September 1645) the area between castles and manor houses was caused after either side life will have been relatively the two cities became a war zone. A zone, the end of the war when walls were blown peaceful. In the wild border country that was perhaps, best-described in modern military up, a process known as slighting. Bristol south Gloucestershire for two years between speak as an area of low level conflict. Castle was almost totally destroyed in 1656 1643 and 1645 was very much a lawless no and the scar of slighting can clearly be seen at go area. Just look at the events which Garrisons were placed at various points and Defensive Raglan Castle, Monmouthshire. occurred just after the surrender of Berkeley there was much patrolling and foraging, the Bastion castle (as quoted by Warrington), when latter often being an excuse for plunder. While many field-works associated with the Colonel Forbes broke the 1643 surrender Although passions certainly ran high during civil war survive, some spectacular like the the conflict it is fairly clear that many of the Queens Sconce at Newark, others such as the landowners whatever their nominal allegiance defences of Bristol on Brandon Hill much less were as much concerned with protecting so, there is much we do not know about hearth and home. For example we know from military operations of the period. Battlefield the recently published excavation report for archaeology has expanded our knowledge of Acton Court that the vulnerable north side of the set piece battle of the period. Mount Mill Fort One has only to look at the battle of Naseby (June 1645) where Parliament finally won the Civil War, a site with an excellent series of contemporary and near contemporary References: records. We knew within a couple of meters Aitkin M Laughlin W (1992) Gloucester and the where each unit was, what it did and where it Civil War: A city under Siege. went, except that we didn’t! Naseby far from Foard G (forthcoming) Naseby. being a fairly easy victory for Parliament was Rodwell K Bell R (2004) Acton Court: The evolution to quote the Duke of Wellington at the battle of a Tudor courtier’s house. of Fuentes de Onoro “A near run thing”; the Warrington AR (1997) Civil War, Interregnum and the site was defended by ditches and royalists almost won and the battlefield Restoration 1640-1672 earthworks and the trenching of these feature covered a much larger area than anyone produced bullets dated by clay pipes to the suspected. Much of the information was 1640s. Whether the bullets were fired in retrieved by the structured use of metal anger we cannot say. detectors. The defensive tower of Yate Court 2 Archaeology - Issue 8 December 2004 3 Interview: Meet the Conservation Officer Mandy Powell The South Gloucestershire Mines Research Job Title: Group (SGMRG) started in December 2002 Conservation Officer and we now have 64 members and 6 honourary members spread all around South Job Duties: Gloucestershire and further afield. The annual I deal mainly with issues in Conservation subscription is £10. Areas. There are currently 29 Conservation The focus of the group is specific to mining, Areas in South Gloucestershire, which have covering all aspects in the area including been designated because of their special celestine, coal, iron, lead, ochre silver and architectural or historic interest. The work stone mining. Inevitably this overlaps with is varied and involves assessing planning other organisations such as the GSIA, AIBT, applications and advising on development BIAS and local history organisations for those proposals so they do not harm the parishes where mining took place. We very character or appearance of these historic much see our role as ancillary to such groups areas. I also undertake character appraisals rather than an alternative and working in connection with the review of existing together to pool resources and information.
Recommended publications
  • Seventy-First Annual Meeting, Part I, Volume 65
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOMERSETSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND NATURAL HISTORY 'SOCIETY DURING THE YEAR I919. THE Seventy-First Annual Meeting of the Somersetshire Archaeological and Natural History Society was held at Taunton on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, July 29th, 30th and 31st, and was favoured with delightful weather. A meeting of the Council was held at Taunton Castle at 11.15 a.m. ; and was followed at 2.15 p.m. by the Annual General Meeting, which took place in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Buildings (placed at the Society's disposal by the kindness of the Mayor of Taunton). In the absence of Dr. F. J. Haverfield, the outgoing Presi- dent, who was conducting a party of antiquaries over the Roman Wall in the north of England, the senior vice-president, the Rt. Hon. Henry Hobhotjse presided at the beginning of the meeting and proposed the election of Mr. Henry Balfour, M.A., f.r.g.s., F.z.s., f.s.a., as President for the ensuing year. Mr. Hobhouse said that the Society was to be congratulated upon having secured such a well known ethnologist and archaeologist as Mr. Balfour, in succession to such a distin- guished Roman scholar as Dr. Haverfield. For many years Mr. Balfour has filled the important position of Curator of the Pitt Rivers Museum in the University of Oxford ; he was a past President of the Royal Anthropological Institute and of Section H of the British Association. Mr. C. Tite seconded, and the motion having been heartily carried, Mr. Balfour took the chair as president.
    [Show full text]
  • IOS Brand Guidelines
    Brand Guidelines ! Our Brand This document is a guide to the branding and style of communication of Icons Of Steam.! To grow our message it is essential that our brand is applied consistently throughout our operation and by those using our engines, so that everyone exposed to our locomotives know who we are.! These guidelines should be followed whenever designing or delivering communications that represent Icons Of Steam and the locomotives we operate. ! Icons Of Steam Icons Of Steam is a brand of Locomotive Services Limited, created for the purposes of public engagement.! Locomotive Services Limited Locomotive Services Ltd. is the operating company responsible for the operation, maintenance and LOCOMOTIVE restoration of locomotives for mainline use. It also SERVICES LIMITED undertakes to operate its own railtours and other public engagement activities through the Icons Of Steam identity.! Royal Scot Locomotive & General Trust The Royal Scot Locomotive & General Trust (RSLGT) was formed in 2009 to protect for the ROYAL SCOT long term a representative group of steam LOCOMOTIVE & GENERAL TRUST locomotives capable of hauling passenger trains on both the mainline and on heritage railways. ! Brand clarity Icons Of Steam is the public brand of Locomotive Services Limited.! When communicating with regard to the operation of our locomotives, only the Icons Of Steam brand should be used.! When engaging with the public, the Icons Of Steam identity should always be used in place of Locomotive Services Ltd.! The Royal Scot Locomotive and General Trust branding should be used in conjunction with the Icons Of Steam identity, regarding locomotives owned by the trust.! Avoid using Locomotive Services Ltd as our identity in communications targeted at the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Gloucester's Government
    Reprinted from Gloucestershire History No. 21 (2007) pages 8-15 The Evolution of Gloucester’s Government: A.D. 96 -1835‘ by Alan Sparkes With the Cotswolds to its east and the highlands of the Forest of Dean to its west, Gloucester is located on the broad plain of the Severn Vale, the whole area being described as a ‘threefold landscape (of) forest, vale and wold’.2 Gloucester’s social, economic and political development owes much to its position on the river Severn. From the Dobunni settlement of Cair Glou, to the Roman colonia of Glevum, to the Anglo- Saxon sub-capital of Gleaweastre and the Norman royal borough of Glowecestre, Gloucester’s location on a low point of the river Severn represented an important strategic position, providing access into South Wales. Whilst ‘that was always its importance and the reason for its being’, the site also came to represent a natural hub for river trade and access to inland markets.4 From Early Settlement to Shire Town. Gloucester’s location rendered it a significant administrative centre through its long history. Despite the earlier existence of Cair Glou also referred to as ‘Caer Glowe, the fair or bright city’,5 Gloucester’s origins may be dated to A.D. 96 when the Roman administration founded the settlement of Glevum, thereby commanding a strategic crossing point into South Wales.6 Glevum eventually enjoyed the status of a colonia or ‘chartered city’, providing it with the officers and rank to administer local government.7 However, Roman influence declined with the occupying force’s departure in the fifth century and Glevum decayed.8 Yet its streets and the walls surrounding them remained to influence, ‘in no small measure,’ the physical development of the town for more than a millennium.9 However, the toWn’s return to administrative prominence was more immediate.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOUCESTERSHIRE ROUNDHEADS by Russell Howes
    Reprinted from Gloucestershire History N0. 7 (1993) pages 4-7 GLOUCESTERSHIRE ROUNDHEADS By Russell Howes The people of Gloucestershire were divided in the civil war of themselves at vast expense. However the story goes that Cromwell the seventeenth century, some being for the king, and some for and Ireton visited Chavenage, and persuaded Stephens to support parliament. Each county and borough returned two members to the setting up of a court to try the king. Charles I was executed in parliament, and in Gloucestershire. as in some other counties, one 1649, though Stephens was not a member of the court. The story was a royalist. and the other a parliamentarian. The parliamentarian continues that, soon after the execution, Stephens died, and his was Nathaniel Stephens, who had houses at Eastington and shade departed in a carriage driven by a headless man in royal Chavenage. At the first election of 1640 he was suddenly set up livery. However he was alive in 1660, when he was named a commissioner for the militia, and a tablet in Eastington church i '. indicates that he died that year. Q :13. Two cousins of Nathaniel were in parliament. Edward Q '.\l-' Stephens of Little Sodbury was member for Tewkesbury. He opposed the trial of Charles I, and published A Letter ofAdvice to J ‘II Qag] 5 N ' " “" g Sir Thomas Faitfax, imploring him to save the nation from 7 #431 | 14,.-. murdering the king. He helped to bring about the restoration in 7-»-I" __ 7 . T‘ “'3 .21 _*- \-w-Q " -_ *5-‘ 1- 1660; as ‘old Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Routes
    Minehead Dunster Blue Anchor Washford Clevedon Clevedon Tyntesfield Oakham Station Station Station Station Lambretta Weston-Super-Mare (Wraxall)Treasures Exmoor Classic West Somerset Scooter Museum Pier Court Car Collection Rural Life Museum Museum (W-s-M) (Portbury) (Porlock) (Allerford) Helicopter Stogursey Castle Kilve Chantry Nether Stowey Castle Brean Down Museum (W-s-M) & Fort Coleridge Cottage Minehead Dunster WorkingDunster CastleDunster DollsBlue Anchor Somerset &Cleeve Dorset Abbey (Nether Stowey) Water Mill Museum Railway MuseumRailway Museum(Washford) Museum of MethodismDovery Manor HolnicoteBurgundy Estate Chapel (Selworthy) (Washford) Burnham-on-Sea From Bristol in West Somerset (Porlock)Museum (Porlock) Watchet Axbridge & Lighthouse District Museum Market House (King John’s Dolebury Warren Museum Brent Knoll Hunting Lodge) Hill Fort Blake Museum Hill Fort Cheddar Caves & Gorge: West Somerset Mineral Railway Watchet (Bridgwater) Museum of Prehistory (Brendon Hills) Boat Museum Somerset Brick Watchet & Tile Museum Ashton Windmill Charterhouse (Bridgwater) Farleigh Hungerford Washford Radio Museum Barford (at Tropiquaria) Sweets Peat and Priddy Barrows Castle Park Westonzoyland Combe Sydenham Hall Pumping Station Science Museum Mells From North Devon Bakelite Museum (Enmore) & Country Park (Monksilver) Fyne Court Museum Wookey (Williton) Frome Museum (Broomfield) Hole Caves West Somerset Railway Battle of Abbot’s Fish & Museum Nunney Castle Cothay Manor and Gardens (Bishops Lydeard) Water Mill & Hestercombe Sedgemoor House
    [Show full text]
  • Plans for 375 Civil War Commemoration 2018 the Siege Of
    Plans for 375 Civil war commemoration 2018 The Siege of Gloucester was an engagement in the First English Civil War. It took place between 10 August and 5 September 1643, between the defending Parliamentarian garrison of Gloucester and the besieging army of King Charles I. The siege ended with the arrival of a relieving Parliamentarian army under the Earl of Essex. The Royalist forces withdrew, having sustained heavy casualties and had several cannon disabled as a result of sallies made by the defenders. 5th September 2018 will be the 375th anniversary of the day the siege of Gloucester was lifted. This is annually commemorated during “Gloucester Day” celebrations which are generally held on the first Saturday in September. #Gloucester375 commemorations To commemorate the 375th anniversary of the lifting of the siege of Gloucester there a number of initiatives that are being discussed with a range of partners across the city which would take place, appropriately across the two weeks of the History Festival and Heritage open days including · Enhanced Gloucester Day celebrations (some re-enactment -possibly Col Massey and a few troops) · Series of Talks at History festival Blackfriars and City voices · Programme of Civil war walking tours (Civic Trust and others) · Civil war Re-enactment in Gloucester park involving 200 reenactors and horses and living camp, possibly a ticketed all day event 15/16th September (Sunday main focus) · 15/16th September living camp in bowling green Gloucester · Heritage Open Days (HODs) 5th/6th September, themed around Civil War, with costumes provided 6th/7th September · Also during HODs re-enactment of scenes depicting stories of Gloucester from the civil war such as the canon ball that rolled down Southgate and the famous pig that was taken around the city walls · Special brochure explaining history of siege of Gloucester, civil war and Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset County Guide
    Historic churches in Somerset discover the rich delights visitchurches.org.uk/daysout 1 take a closer look Somerset’s historic churches are among the most beautiful in the country. Many stand in pretty villages or quiet rural locations, the perfect picture of all things English. 13 But look closer and you’ll see that Somerset churches have their own distinct character. There are churches of legend, those with features that rival grand cathedrals’ and some so seemingly untouched by time it’s as if they have been sleeping under a spell. The historic churches of Somerset are waiting to be discovered. All the churches in this leaflet have been saved by The Churches Conservation Trust. The Trust is a charity that cares for more than 340 churches in England. This is one of 18 leaflets that highlight their history and treasures. spellbinding For more information on the other guides in this series, as well as interactive maps and downloadable information, visitors of all ages are enchanted by see visitchurches.org.uk ‘Rip Van Winkle’s St James’, Cameley 1 3 Cameley, Langport, St James All Saints Somerset’s ‘Hunky Punks’ and the best ‘Sleeping Beauty’ stained glass in Somerset This beautiful hillside landmark, with an impressive All Saints, built mainly in the 15th and 16th centuries, stands 15th-century tower made of red sandstone, assaults the on a hill near the river Parrett, overlooking the remains of senses. The nave walls lean slightly outwards, the flagstone a Benedictine abbey. Its bold, pinnacled west tower, covered floor slopes gently downhill. The fabulous wall paintings are with gargoyles known locally as ‘Hunky Punks’, is a local from the 12th to the 17th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Military Career of Richard, Lord Molyneux, C
    THE MILITARY CAREER OF RICHARD, LORD MOLYNEUX, C. 1623-54 J.M. Gratton, B.A., M.Ed. Although it is indisputable that James Stanley seventh Earl of Derby was widely regarded as the major Lancashire royalist, especially in the first and third civil wars, in terms of activity and enthusiasm for the Royal cause, two other Lancashire personalities deserve more attention than they have hitherto received - Sir Thomas Tyldesley and Richard Lord Molyneux. Of these two prominent Royalist leaders Tyldesley figures far more amongst both contemporary observers and later commentators.' In contrast Lord Molyneux has remained a shadowy figure. Virtually nothing is known of his character nor how he was regarded by his contemporaries.2 Furthermore most secondary accounts have failed to document in full the contribution Molyneux made to the Royalist side in a career which saw him rise to the rank of brigade commander and led to his fighting as far north as Cumberland, as far south and east as Brentford and as far west as Montgomeryshire. The Molyneux, primarily yet not exclusively Roman Catholic, had emerged by the seventeenth century as the second most important family in Lancashire, second only to the Stanleys. When James I introduced the new order of baronets in 1611, Sir Richard Molyneux of Sefton was the second baronet in all England. Sir Richard was created first Viscount Molyneux of Maryborough in the Irish Peerage in December 1628. In the same year he was Deputy-Lieutenant of Lancashire but noted as a recusant and non- communicant. The First Viscount was one of only two Royalist gentry in the county who held an important office of state between 1625 and 1645 being Receiver-General of the Duchy of Lancaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Mendip Rocks! 2014 Festival of Geology Evaluation 2014 Festival Events Were Well Attended and Enjoyed Widespread Publicity in the Local Media
    Mendip Rocks! 2014 Festival of Geology Evaluation 2014 festival events were well attended and enjoyed widespread publicity in the local media. 24 events were staged, a substantial increase on the previous year of 17 events. The festival is a marvellous collaboration and a huge thanks to all who contributed: Alan Gray, Banwell Bone Caves Heritage Group (voluntary), Butterfly Conservation, Elizabeth Devon, Earthlearningidea, Mendip Hills AONB, Mendip Society, Chris Richard, North Somerset Council, National Trust, Natural England, National Trust, Maple Leaf Orienteering, Plantlife, Quarry Faces Project, Radstock Museum, Somerset Earth Science Centre, Somerset Wildlife Trust, Wells and District Heritage Museum, and Westbury sub Mendip Quarry. NEW FOR 2014: Schools Engagement New to the festival was involving local schools. ‘Big Rock Day’, at Burrington Combe. The launch event involved classes from 4 local schools visiting Burrington Combe. 4 organisations kindly agreed to providing workshops – Butterfly Conservation: planting butterfly friendly plants to take home after learning about butterfly attracting limestone flora, Plantlife:lower plants survey on limestone woodland Somerset Earth Science Centre – interactive activity, learning how the rocks and gorge of Burrington were created Somerset Wildlife Trust – limestone grassland sensory activities It was also appreciated the enthusiasm and support shown by David Rowley, geology teacher at Wells Cathedral school who also attended and provided valuable volunteer assistanace from his 6
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War for Book from a Variety of Sources Including an Unpublished
    Civil War for book From a variety of sources including an unpublished paper by Jayne Todd. The first pitched battle of the war, at Edgehill on 23 October 1642, proved inconclusive, both Royalists and Parliamentarians claiming victory. After capturing Banbury on 27 October 1642, King Charles decided to move to Oxford and make it his base. The turning point came in the late summer and early autumn of 1643, when the Earl of Essex’s army forced the King to raise the siege of Gloucester and then brushed the Royalists aside at the first Battle of Newbury (20 September 1643), to return triumphantly to London. In 1645, Parliament reorganized its main forces into the New Model Army, under the command of Sir Thomas Fairfax, with Oliver Cromwell as his second-in-command and Lieutenant-General of Horse. In two decisive engagements – the Battle of Naseby on 14 June and the Battle of Langport on 10 July – the Parliamentarians effectively destroyed Charles’s armies. Wheatley was on the front line in the Civil War. On 8th March 1643, Lord George Digby’s regiment of horse, consisting of scholars from the University, arrived in Wheatley and ‘a great gate was erected on Wheatley bridge, and none hardly suffered to passe without a ticket from Sir Jacob Astley’. Presumably this was an attempt by the Royalist garrison to control the passage of Parliamentarian sympathisers and spies. On 24th March 1643 Sir Samuel Luke, spymaster general to Cromwell, reported evidence of local dissent either to restriction of free passage, or perhaps against the Royalist occupation of the village – the gate had been thrown into the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundheads and Cavaliers in Prestbury by Tony Noel
    Roundheads and Cavaliers in Prestbury by Tony Noel In 1643 the King had captured Bristol but only after a bloody struggle. Gloucester was the next target for the Kings army. It was the lowest bridge over the Severn and as a trading centre was heavily taxed by the crown and therefore supported the Parliament. This time the King opted for a siege, after the city refused to yield to his army. The city was well defended by Edward Massie, who much later changed sides and was imprisoned. Concerned about the siege the Council of London agreed to the complaints of the Earl of Essex about his weak forces and authorised London Trained Bands and auxiliary regiments to march to relieve Gloucester with Essex’s regular army. After a hard time living off the poor villages in the Cotswolds, Essex reached Prestbury Hill on September 5th. There were few tracks down off of the hill to Prestbury and the other villages in the valley and attempts to travel down Aggs hill resulted in a serious confrontation with the Cavaliers from Cheltenham. Cannons and the wagons could not be easily brought down from the hill using the sunken lanes in safety. Canons were fired on the hill to encourage Gloucester but it is unlikely that they were heard. Although much of the army found billets in villages like Prestbury some were in fields around Darkes Farm, many were left on the hill in bad weather. Sergeant Henry Foster reported that his men, not used to the countryside, had a difficult time on Prestbury hill with little shelter.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SIEGE of GLOUCESTER INTRODUCTION the Siege Is a Small but Important Element of the English Civil Wars That Lasted from 1642 to 1651
    THE SIEGE OF GLOUCESTER INTRODUCTION The siege is a small but important element of the English Civil Wars that lasted from 1642 to 1651. The siege properly belongs to the period of The First Civil War 1642- 1647. It lasted from 10th August to 5th September 1643. However, these events are informed by and should be viewed within, the wider perspective of the Wars of the Three Kingdoms that spanned the period 1638 -1660 The backdrop is that, for a variety of reasons, mostly commercial but also pervaded by a profound belief among many, that the King had exceeded what was right and proper in constitutional terms, in his demands and behaviour. To quote P W Thomas in his work ‘Two cultures? Court and Country under Charles I, ‘ The Civil War was about the whole condition of a society threatened by a failure of the ruling caste both to uphold traditional national aims and values, and to adapt itself to a rapidly changing world’1 When it came down to the divisions within the country that pitted people against one another, Gloucester declared support for the Parliamentarian cause against King Charles I. It is not clear how widely supported within the city the declaration for Cromwell was, and reports of Royalist supporters’ dissent are easily found in the reporting of events at the time and after the Restoration. THE WIDER PERSPECTIVE The siege took place after a run of Royalist successes often referred to as the ‘Royalist Summer’ Things were going well for the King and he held the upper hand in the North and West.
    [Show full text]