DOCSLIB.ORG

Monitoring the Water Quality of the Nation's Large Rivers Rio Grande NASQAN Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monitoring the Water Quality of the Nation's Large Rivers Rio Grande NASQAN Program USGS science fora changing world Monitoring the Water Quality of the Nation's Large Rivers Rio Grande NASQAN Program The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has monitored the water quality in the Rio Grande Basin as part of the redesigned National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN) since 1995 (Hooper and others, 1997). The NASQAN program was designed to characterize the concentra­ tions and transport of sediment and selected chemical constituents found in the Nation's large rivers including the Mississippi, Colorado, and Columbia in addition to the Rio Grande. In these four basins, the USGS currently (1998) operates a network of 40 NASQAN sites, with an emphasis on quantifying the mass flux for each constituent (the amount of material moving past the site, expressed in tons per day). By applying a consistent flux-based approach in the Rio Grande Basin, the NASQAN pro­ gram is generating the information needed to identify regional sources for a variety of constit­ uents, including agricultural chemicals and trace elements, in the basin. The effect of the large reservoirs on the Rio Grande can be observed as constituent fluxes are routed downstream. The analysis of constituent fluxes on a basin-wide scale will provide the means to assess the influence of human activity on water-quality conditions in the Rio Grande. Environmental Setting Irrigation withdrawals from the Rio Grande site at El Paso is 125 river miles (in the lower Rio Grande Valley, which downstream of Elephant Butte The Rio Grande originates in the San comprises Cameron, Hildalgo, Starr, and Reservoir in New Mexico and 1 .7 miles Juan Mountains of southern Colorado and Willacy Counties) accounted for about 44 upstream of the American Dam at El follows a 1,885-mile course before it percent of the surface-water irrigation Paso. Streamflow in the Rio Grande at flows into the Gulf of Mexico (fig. 1). withdrawals in Texas during 1994 (Texas El Paso is controlled largely by releases Along the way, the river and its tributaries Water Development Board, 1996). from Elephant Butte Reservoir. At drain a land area of 182,200 square miles. American Dam, much of the flow in the This drainage encompasses a widely Site Selection Rio Grande is diverted for irrigation and varied landscape in the United States and municipal uses to the American Canal Mexico, including mountains, forests, and Eight NASQAN sampling sites in Texas and the Acequia Madre Canal deserts. The basin is home to diverse (fig. 1, table 1) were selected in the Rio in Mexico. Downstream of El Paso/ native plants and wildlife as well as some Grande Basin to monitor the fluxes from Ciudad Juarez, the Rio Grande has little 10 million people 8 million in Mexico subbasins. Sites were located specifically or no flow until the waters of the Rio alone. For approximately two-thirds of its to measure inflow and outflow of material Conchos, which originates in the Sierra course, the river also serves as the from the two main-stem reservoirs Madre Occidental in Mexico, join the boundary between the United States (Amistad International and Falcon river near Presidio/Ojinaga. and Mexico. International) that strongly affect the flux Rio Grande at Foster Ranch In this mostly arid to semiarid region, of chemical constituents and sediment in near Langtry (2) is approximately the absence of flow in the river as well as the the Rio Grande. Land use in the subbasins 600 miles downstream of El Paso and presence of flow determines the basin's is dominated by rangeland, with forest, 300 miles downstream of the character. Many of the river tributaries are agricultural, and urban areas constituting confluence of the Rio Grande and Rio intermittent streams. Much of the flow is the remainder (Texas Natural Resource Conchos. Because much of the water controlled by numerous reservoirs in the Conservation Commission, 1994, fig. reaching El Paso is diverted, basin. Throughout the basin, an extensive 1.2). In descriptions of each site below, Streamflow at Foster Ranch is largely system of water structures captures and the numbers in parentheses correspond to from the Rio Conchos. This site, in controls the flow of water in the subbasins site numbers in figure 1 and table 1. conjunction with the Pecos River site, to meet regional needs for flood control, Rio Grande at El Paso (1) reflects provides data to describe the flux of power generation, and storage for domestic, drainage of the entire Rio Grande main constituents and sediment into agricultural, and industrial purposes. stem in Colorado and New Mexico. The Amistad International Reservoir. U.S. Geological Survey USGS Fact Sheet FS-083-98 U.S. Department of the Interior Table 1. Description of NASQAN sampling sites in the Rio Grande Basin [ . not applicable] Incremental ^itp Drainage Incremental Mean increase/ one increase in streamflow decrease in no. Name area (fig- 1) (square drainage area (cubic feet streamflow \ w / miles) (square miles) per second) (cubic feet per second) 1 Rio Grande at El Paso, Tex. 29,267 0 640 640 f 2 Rio Grande at Foster Ranch nearrf., »_ -.Langtry, 0 J ^ Tex. -,r- ._ __ .. 80,742 51,475 1,946 -T«-'- -Ct_1,306 ' 3 Pecos River near Langtry, Tex. 35,179 0 262 262 4 Rio Grande below Amistad Dam near Del Rio, Tex. 123,143 42,401 2,510 302 5 Rio Grande below Laredo, Tex. 132,578 9,435 3,433 923 6 Rio Grande below Falcon Dam, Tex. 159,270 26.692 3,223 -210 " 7 Arroyo Colorado at Harlingen, Tex. 182 -- 247 ~"M^K 8 Rio Grande near Brownsville, Tex. 176,333 1 7,063 2,226 -997 Pecos River near Langtry (3) is on and biological processes to alter the quality data on the outflow from the reservoir, the Pecos River approximately 15 miles of the inflowing water. These processes which can be compared to data on the upstream of its confluence with the Rio include deposition of sediment, evaporative inflow to assess the effect of retention Grande. The Pecos River is the major concentration of solutes, and biological and transformation of material within tributary to the Rio Grande within the removal of nutrients. This site provides the reservoir. United States. The Pecos River originates in the mountains of northern ior New Mexico, flows southward through EXPLANATION eastern New Mexico, and empties into Red Bluff Reservoir at the Texas-New SUBBASIN-ddentified by the location Mexico border. The flow of the Pecos of the most downstream point of the River at Langtry has been regulated by subbasin. except for closed basins) this reservoir since 1937. The Pecos | | Rio Grande at El Paso River joins the Rio Grande at the %f~] Rio Grande at Foster Ranch upstream end of Amistad International | | Pecos River near Langtry Reservoir. 35 Rio Grande below Amistad Dam I"*1 ' | Rio Grande below Amistad Dam near Del Rio (4). Water in Amistad | ,./ ] Rio Grande below Laredo 34° International Reservoir has a mean I | Rio Grande Below Falcon Dam residence time of about 1.6 years, which ELEPHANT RUT" [*'' | Rio Grande near Brownsville allows for numerous chemical, physical, RESERVOIR | | Closed basin NASQAN sampling site (number refers to table 1) MISTAD 1TERK \TIOMAL SERVOIR 28' Laredo \ United States 99° '~ FALCON INTERNATIONAL RESERVOIR LACUNA MWRI .6 r~Nv Mission Willacy N« /'" ^ ville Cameron Hidalgo Figure 1. Rio Grande Basin showing subbasins and NASQAN sampling sites. Rio Grande below Laredo (5). lead, and zinc, many common water- attributed to natural saline springs, About 37 percent of the water that soluble pesticides such as atrazine and irrigation return flows, and evaporation discharges from the Rio Grande Basin metalochlor, and suspended sediment. during the summer months. enters the river between the Amistad Frequency of sampling ranges from 6 to Metals also could be present in International Reservoir and Laredo. This 10 times per year depending on local site the Rio Grande because of extensive reach also has large centers of population characteristics. In the upper Rio Grande mining in New Mexico and in the Rio and industry that could affect water Basin, flow generally peaks in the early Conchos Basin in Mexico. The rapid quality. This site provides data to account summer. In the middle and lower regions development of maquiladoras for the inflow of chemical constituents of the basin, flow is controlled primarily (assembly plants in Mexico) also could and sediment from this major subbasin to by releases from Amistad International contribute to trace element the Rio Grande and to describe the and Falcon International Reservoirs. concentrations in the lower Rio Grande quality of inflow to Falcon International Because these reservoir releases are Basin (Texas Natural Resource Reservoir. dictated largely by irrigation needs, Conservation Commission, 1994). Rio Grande below Falcon Dam sti eamflow in the middle and lower basin Historical data for riverbed sediments (6) is 2.5 miles downstream of Falcon tends to be more e e.ily distributed than in the Rio Grande indicate increasing Dam. The Rio Salado in Mexico, which that in the upper basin and peak flows temporal trends in more trace elements joins the Rio Grande at the upstream end typically occur in the late summer and in the reaches of the river near El Paso of Falcon International Reservoir, is the early fall. The sampling strategy is to and Laredo than in other reaches, major tributary to this reach. This site assess water-quality conditions throughout which could be related to human provides data on the retention and the range of flows, with an emphasis on activities within the subbasins transformation of materials transported high flows. The strategy will be adjusted upstream of El Paso and Laredo (Lee into Falcon International Reservoir.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sharing the Colorado River and the Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Mexico
    Sharing the Colorado River and the Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Mexico December 12, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45430 {222A0E69-13A2-4985-84AE-73CC3DFF4D02}-R-065134085251065165027250227152136081055238021128244192097047169070027044111226189083158176100054014174027138098149076081229242065001223143228213208120077243222253018219014073197030033204036098221153115024066109133181160249027233236220178084 SUMMARY R45430 Sharing the Colorado River and the December 12, 2018 Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Nicole T. Carter Specialist in Natural Mexico Resources Policy The United States and Mexico share the waters of the Colorado River and the Rio Grande. A bilateral water treaty from 1944 (the 1944 Water Treaty) and other binational agreements guide Stephen P. Mulligan how the two governments share the flows of these rivers. The binational International Boundary Legislative Attorney and Water Commission (IBWC) administers these agreements. Since 1944, the IBWC has been the principal venue for addressing river-related disputes between the United States and Mexico. The 1944 Water Treaty authorizes the IBWC to develop rules and to issue proposed decisions, Charles V. Stern called minutes, regarding matters related to the treaty’s execution and interpretation. Specialist in Natural Resources Policy Water Delivery Requirements Established in Binational Agreements. The United States’ and Mexico’s water-delivery obligations derive from multiple treaty sources and vary depending on the body of water. Under the 1944 Water Treaty, the United States is required to provide Mexico with 1.5 million acre-feet (AF) of Colorado River water annually. The 1944 Water Treaty also addresses the nations’ respective rights to waters of the Rio Grande downstream of Fort Quitman, TX. It requires Mexico to deliver to the United States an annual minimum of 350,000 AF of water, measured in five-year cycles (i.e., 1.75 million AF over five years).
    [Show full text]
  • B-196345 Contractual Arrangements Relating to Sale Of
    is ,[GEN1RAL OF UN ITED AT43L \ X~~~~~~~~~~~~~VA~fl1tlG70t4, Vteet 24544 13-196345 flay 1, 1980 The Honorable Abraham K~azen, Jr. House of IRepresentafires Dear 1\r. Kazen: 8ittI*,O .Plblo rAd IIIg* This is in answer to your request for our *pinion ot whether contracts for the disposition and trvelztsmission of powyer and energy from the Falcon and Amistad hydro-eleculec p~rojects violate the preference provision of the Falcon-Amis tard Darn Act, (Act'of June 18, 1954, Pubu. L. No, 83-406, 68 Sta~t 255, as ame nded by the Act of December 23, 1963, Pzub, L. No. 88-237, 77 Stat.t 475). as well1 axs on certain relatend issues, We have studied the view's of all the parties concerned as well as the relevant statutory provisions and other applicable documents. Wye do not believe the contracts in question vriolate either the }preterence clause or any other applicable stattltory provision, This and your other questions are addressed belowg in the, order, they appear In your, letter. Backgrouund On August 9, 1977, the SIouthd-Texas Electric Cooperative, Ines (OTE C) and Medina Electric Cooperative'.Inc. (MEC) contracted with the United States Burcau of Reclamation, De6'parttennt of Interior (Burceau), to pi~r- 'V,',Wchase all of then pouver and energy',(hereafter referred to'collectively £qs powver) to be generated at the AmilI'tad and Falcon hydro-'blectric facli~ties after the Amistad plant Is placed Ipto coffinercial operation,, The Ce'tral Power and Light Company (CPLi oisvn's the only transmission lines in the vicinity of either the Falcon or Amistad dams and construction of dupli-.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Draft Draft Draft 10/31/05
    Binational Rio Grande Summit Cooperation for a Better Future Cooperación para un Futuro Mejor Cumbre Binacional del Río Bravo November 17-18, 2005 Reynosa,Tamaulipas & McAllen, Texas BACKGROUND DOCUMENT International Boundary and Water Commission United States and Mexico “Lasting peace will come from the careful, patient, practical solution of particular problems.” ---United States President Lyndon B. Johnson “The factors that unite us are enough to construct a solid pedestal of enduring friendship.” ---Mexican President Adolfo Lopez Mateos Remarks at El Paso, Texas-Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, September 25, 1964, regarding the Chamizal Project on the Rio Grande, which settled a longstanding boundary dispute between the United States and Mexico. Binational Rio Grande Summit Background Document INDEX Page # Message from the Commissioners ........................................................................................... 4 Introduction................................................................................................................................ 5 The International Boundary and Water Commission............................................................ 5 Geography and Hydrology of the Rio Grande Basin ............................................................ 6 Convention of 1906 .................................................................................................................... 8 1944 Water Treaty ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lead and Arsenic Contamination by a Smelter Plant Located in the Mexico-USA Boundary Area
    Lead and Arsenic Contamination by a Smelter Plant Located in the Mexico-USA Boundary Area F.E. Porras Hernández 1, M.T. Alarcón Herrera 2, A. Granados Olivas 1, and I.R. Martin Domínguez 2. 1Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez (UACJ), Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Ave of Charro 450 North Ciudad Juárez, México 2Environment and Energy Department, Advanced Materials Research Center (CIMAV), Chihuahua, Mexico Key Words: contamination, soil, arsenic, lead, smelting Summary The ASARCO smelter, located in El Paso del Norte border region between Chihuahua (Mexico) and Texas and New Mexico (United States of America), was working for approximately 100 years, mainly in the casting of metals. The direct impacts to soil and water due to the emissions coming out from the smelter are considered in this study. It is assumed that during the period of its operation, the plant continuously released lead, cadmium and arsenic to the atmosphere. This research is limited to an area enclosed in 5 km-perimeter circle, Ciudad Juarez included. A geospatial analysis, using a digital-thematic cartography, is presented. The types of soil in the area of interest included variables such as: geology, topography, surface hydrology and regional climate. Taking the main chimney of the smelter as a center, the study area is enclosed into concentric circles with radii that range from 500 m up to 5000 m. Within this area, 160 soil samples of 0.60 m depth and 160 soil samples of 0.05 m were collected. The lab analysis of the samples showed that after the closing of the plant, 10 years ago, the pollution of soil by arsenic and lead still remains in some points near the main Chimney.
    [Show full text]
  • El Paso Del Norte: a Cultural Landscape History of the Oñate Crossing on the Camino Real De Tierra Adentro 1598 –1983, Ciudad Juárez and El Paso , Texas, U.S.A
    El Paso del Norte: A Cultural Landscape History of the Oñate Crossing on the Camino Real de Tierra Adentro 1598 –1983, Ciudad Juárez and El Paso , Texas, U.S.A. By Rachel Feit, Heather Stettler and Cherise Bell Principal Investigators: Deborah Dobson-Brown and Rachel Feit Prepared for the National Park Service- National Trails Intermountain Region Contract GS10F0326N August 2018 EL PASO DEL NORTE: A CULTURAL LANDSCAPE HISTORY OF THE OÑATE CROSSING ON THE CAMINO REAL DE TIERRA ADENTRO 1598–1893, CIUDAD JUÁREZ, MEXICO AND EL PASO, TEXAS U.S.A. by Rachel Feit, Heather Stettler, and Cherise Bell Principal Investigators: Deborah Dobson-Brown and Rachel Feit Draft by Austin, Texas AUGUST 2018 © 2018 by AmaTerra Environmental, Inc. 4009 Banister Lane, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78704 Technical Report No. 247 AmaTerra Project No. 064-009 Cover photo: Hart’s Mill ca. 1854 (source: El Paso Community Foundation) and Leon Trousset Painting of Ciudad Juárez looking toward El Paso (source: The Trousset Family Online 2017) Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Oñate Crossing in Context .............................................................................................................. 1 .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Texas-Mexico International Bridges and Border Crossings
    TEXAS-MEXICO INTERNATIONAL BRIDGES AND BORDER CROSSINGS Existing and Proposed 2015 Texas-Mexico International Bridges and Border Crossings Existing and Proposed 2015 Table of Contents Overview ...............................................................................................................................................................................i Map ..................................................................................................................................................................................... II Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................... III Veterans International Bridge at Los Tomates ................................................................................................................ 1 Gateway International Bridge ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Free Trade Bridge ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 Weslaco-Progreso International Bridge ......................................................................................................................... 10 Donna International Bridge ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphology and American Dams: the Scientific, Social, and Economic Context
    Geomorphology 71 (2005) 3–26 www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Geomorphology and American dams: The scientific, social, and economic context William L. Graf Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA Received 13 November 2002; received in revised form 11 May 2004; accepted 12 May 2004 Available online 31 May 2005 Abstract American geomorphologic research related to dams is embedded in a complicated context of science, policy, economics, and culture. Research into the downstream effects of large dams has progressed to the point of theory-building, but generalization and theory-building are from this research because (1) it is highly focused on a few locations, (2) it concerns mostly very large dams rather than a representative sample of sizes, (3) the available record of effects is too short to inform us on long-term changes, (4) the reversibility of changes imposed by dam installation and operation is unknown, and (5) coordinated funding for the needed research is scarce. In the scientific context, present research is embedded in a history of geomorphology in government service, with indistinct boundaries between bbasic and appliedQ research. The federal policy that most strongly influences present geomorphological investigations connected with dams is related to habitat for endangered species, because the biological aspects of ecosystems are directly dependent on the substrate formed by the sediments and landforms that are influenced by dams. The economic context for research includes large amounts of public funds for river restoration, along with substantial private investments in dams; and geomorphology is central to these expensive issues. The cultural context for research is highly contentious and dominated by advocacy procedures that include intense scrutiny of any geomorphologic research related to dams.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Report Rio Grande-Caballo Dam to American Dam FLO-2D Modeling, New Mexico and Texas
    Baseline Report Rio Grande-Caballo Dam to American Dam FLO-2D Modeling, New Mexico and Texas Prepared for: United States Section International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) Under IBM 92-21, Task IWO #31 Prepared by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Prime Contractor) Albuquerque District Subcontractors: Mussetter Engineering, Inc., Fort Collins, Colorado Riada Engineering, Inc., Nutruiso, Arizona September 4, 2007 Table of Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................1.1 1.1. Project Objectives ......................................................................................................1.1 1.2. Scope of Work............................................................................................................1.1 1.3. Authorization ..............................................................................................................1.3 2. GEOMORPHOLOGY..........................................................................................................2.1 2.1. Background ................................................................................................................2.1 2.2. Pre-Canalization Conditions.......................................................................................2.1 2.3. Canalization Project ...................................................................................................2.1 2.4. Subreach Delineation.................................................................................................2.3
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Safety in the United States: a Progress Report on the National
    NDSP_Biennial_06-07.qxp 3/9/2009 10:30 AM Page c1 Dam Safety in the United States A Progress Report on the National Dam Safety Program Fiscal Years 2006 and 2007 FEMA P–759/February 2009 NDSP_Biennial_06-07.qxp 3/9/2009 10:30 AM Page c2 Cover photo courtesy: Folsom Dam, CA Bureau of Reclamation NDSP_Biennial_06-07.qxp 3/9/2009 10:30 AM Page i Preface Dams are a vital part of our Nation’s infrastructure, • encourage acceptable engineering policies and providing economic, environmental, and social benefits, procedures to be used for dam site investigation, i including hydroelectric power, river navigation, water design, construction, operation and maintenance, and supply, wildlife habitat, waste management, flood control, emergency preparedness; and recreation.The benefits of dams, however, are countered by the risks they can present. In the event of a • encourage the establishment and implementation of dam failure, the potential energy of the water stored behind effective dam safety programs in each state based on even a small dam is capable of causing loss of life, state standards; significant property damage, and an extended period of denial of the services dams provide. • develop and encourage public awareness projects to increase public acceptance and support of state dam For almost 30 years, reducing the risk of dam failure has safety programs; been the cornerstone and driving force of the National Dam Safety Program.The purpose of the National Dam • develop technical assistance materials for federal and Safety Program, as expressed
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Rio Grande Water Debt
    ISSUE BRIEF 12.08.20 Beyond the Rio Grande Water Debt Stephen P. Mumme, Ph.D., Nonresident Scholar, Center for the United States and Mexico The Rio Grande water war1 is over, at least Mexico’s capacity to meet the treaty’s for now. A summer’s worth of rancor, requirements. There is clearly a need to recrimination, violent protests, and one rethink at least some of the elements that tragic death ended abruptly on October 21, factor into the fulfillment of Mexico’s Rio three days before payment in full was due, Grande treaty obligations. when Mexico agreed to transfer water stored Ironically, the pertinent provisions of the in Rio Grande dams to the United States. 1944 water treaty, officially titled “Utilization Mexico’s last-minute decision to of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers meet its 1944 water treaty2 obligation and of the Rio Grande,” were thought, at was greeted with both sighs of relief and the time, to be exceptionally flexible and annoyance in Texas where irrigation demand to Mexico’s advantage in meeting its treaty peaked July through September, diminishing deal (Enriquez Coyro 1976, 1174). Those the utility of the suddenly restored water provisions, located in the treaty’s Article 4, supply (Arevalo 2020). It peeved Mexican commit Mexico to delivering 350,000 acre- irrigators as well. In Chihuahua, riled feet of water annually to the United States, farmers seized control of La Boquilla Dam a figure that is calculated as an average in the upper Rio Conchos in August to avert over a water delivery cycle of five years, a depletion of that reservoir to fulfill Mexico’s sum obligation of 1,750,000 acre-feet in treaty obligation, and a protest erupted each cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • El Paso Federal Flood Assessment Conference Proceedings Report
    Federal Flood Assessment Conference Recommendations and Proceedings September 6, 2006 Convened by Congressman Silvestre Reyes 16th Congressional District of Texas Organized by Peter Brock, Community Liaison, El Paso Office of the 16th Congressional District of Texas 310 N. Mesa, Suite 400 El Paso, Texas 79901 Proceedings Editor: Dr. Ari Michelsen El Paso Agricultural Research Center Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Texas A&M University 1380 A&M Circle, El Paso, Texas 79927 915-859-9111 Participating Agencies and Organizations: NOAA, National Weather Service U.S. Geological Survey U.S. International Boundary and River Commission U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Bureau of Reclamation El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 Elephant Butte Irrigation District Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Texas Department of Transportation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Flood Assessment Proceedings Table of Contents Background and Purpose ………………………………… page 3 Summary of Priority Recommendations ……………………….... 4 Conference Agenda ……………………………………………… 5 Agency and Organization Proceedings Reports ………………… 7 National Weather Service …………………………………. 8 U.S. Geological Survey ……………………………………. 11 U.S. International Boundary and River Commission ……... 12 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers…………………………….. 15 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency…………………… 19 U.S. Bureau of Reclamation………………………………. 23 El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1………. 31 Elephant Butte Irrigation District…………………………. 34 Department of Homeland Security ……………………….. 36 Texas Department of Transportation……………………… 37 Federal Emergency Management Agency………………… 38 Full List of Agency Priority Recommendations…………………. 39 Participant List and Contact Information………………………… 44 Gauge Station Location and Operating Organization Maps.…... 46 Gauge Stations Along the Rio Grande ………….…….. 47 Gauge Stations in El Paso County…………………….... 48 Conference Power Point Presentations Appendix……………….
    [Show full text]
  • International Boundary and Water Commission Construction
    Proposed Appropriation Language CONSTRUCTION For detailed plan preparation and construction of authorized projects, $31,900,000, to remain available until expended, as authorized. 696 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION CONSTRUCTION International Boundary and Water Commission - Construction Resource Summary ($ in thousands) Appropriations FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 CR FY 2012 Request American Positions 18 18 18 Funds 43,250 43,250 31,900 Program Description The International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) is a treaty-based binational organization comprised of a United States Section and a Mexican Section. The United States Section is headquartered in El Paso, Texas, and the Mexican section is headquartered in Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua. Both Sections have field offices strategically situated along the boundary, which enables the IBWC to carry out its mission objectives and meet its required obligations. Pursuant to treaties between the United States (U.S.) and Mexico and U.S. law, the IBWC carries out several construction projects. This appropriation provides funding for construction projects undertaken independent of, or with, Mexico to rehabilitate or improve water deliveries, flood control, boundary preservation, and sanitation. Since the Convention of February 1, 1933, which provided for rectification of the Rio Grande through the El Paso–Juarez valley, the two governments have participated in several binational construction projects. The Treaty of 1944 provided for the two governments to construct diversion and storage dams on the Rio Grande and Colorado River. The dams provide the means for conservation and regulation of international river waters. In addition, the 1944 Treaty provides for flood control works on the Rio Grande, Colorado River, and Tijuana River.
    [Show full text]