DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainability of Engineered Rivers in Arid Lands: Euphrates-Tigris and Rio Grande/Bravo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainability of Engineered Rivers in Arid Lands: Euphrates-Tigris and Rio Grande/Bravo Sustainability of Engineered Rivers in Arid Lands: Euphrates-Tigris and Rio Grande/Bravo 190 Policy Research Project Report Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs Policy Research Project Report Number 190 Sustainability of Engineered Rivers in Arid Lands: Euphrates-Tigris and Rio Grande/Bravo Project Directed by Aysegül Kibaroğlu Jurgen Schmandt A report by the Policy Research Project on Sustainability of Euphrates-Tigris and Rio Grande/Bravo 2016 The LBJ School of Public Affairs publishes a wide range of public policy issue titles. ISBN: 978-0-89940-818-7 ©2016 by The University of Texas at Austin All rights reserved. No part of this publication or any corresponding electronic text and/or images may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Cover design by Lauren R. Jahnke Maps created by the Houston Advanced Research Center Policy Research Project Participants Graduate Students Deirdre Appel, BA (International Relations and Public Policy), University of Delaware; Master of Global Policy Studies student, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin Jose Balledos, BS (Physics), University of San Carlos; Master of Global Policy Studies student, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin (Fall term only) Christine Bonthius, BA (Physical Geography), University of California, Las Angeles; Ph.D. student (Geography and the Environment), The University of Texas at Austin (Fall term only) Ryan Brown, BA (International Relations and Economics) University of California, Santa Barbara; Master of Global Policy Studies student, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin Podie Chitan, BA (International Relations), ITESM Mexico City; Master of Public Affairs student, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin Marcos Duran, BA (Psychology), Southwestern University, Georgetown, Texas; Master of Public Affairs student, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin Sara Eatman, BS (Mechanical Engineering), University of New Mexico and BA (Humanities), Fort Lewis College; Master student, Environmental and Water Resource Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin (Spring term only) Brian Jackson, BS (Biology and Chemistry), Denison University; Master of Public Affairs student, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin Anne Kilroy, BA (Psychology and International Studies), North Carolina State University; Master of Public Affairs student, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin Marimar Miguel, BA (Women’s and Gender Studies), Texas A&M University; Master of Public Affairs student, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin Haytham Oueidat, BE (Civil and Environmental Engineering), Beirut Arab University; Master of Public Affairs student, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin Faith Martinez Smith, BA (Environmental Science), Westminster College; Master of Global Policy Studies and Master of Science student, The University of Texas at Austin Melissa Stelter, BA (Sam Houston State University); Master of Global Policy Studies student, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin iii Rachel Weinheimer, BA (Classics), The University of Texas at Austin; Master of Global Policy Studies student, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin Technical Advisor George Ward, Ph.D., Research Scientist, Center for Research in Water Resources, Cockrell School of Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Project Directors Aysegül Kibaroğlu, Ph.D., Visiting Professor, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin; and Professor, MEF University, Istanbul Jurgen Schmandt, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin; and Distinguished Fellow, Houston Advanced Research Center iv Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. viii List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... xi Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... xii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... xiii Introduction .................................................................................................................................. xiv PART I. RESERVOIR IMPACT ASSESSMENTS ...................................................................................1 Chapter 1. Methodology ..................................................................................................................2 Chapter 2. Keban Dam .....................................................................................................................5 Chapter 3. Atatürk Dam ...................................................................................................................8 Chapter 4. Tabqa Dam ...................................................................................................................15 Chapter 5. Mosul Dam ...................................................................................................................21 Chapter 6. Middle Rio Grande and Cochiti Dam ..........................................................................29 Chapter 7. Elephant Butte and Caballo Dams ...............................................................................40 Chapter 8. La Boquilla Dam ..........................................................................................................46 Chapter 9. Amistad and Falcón Dams ...........................................................................................57 Chapter 10. Reservoir Impact Assessment Findings .....................................................................73 PART II. WATER ISSUES IN THE EUPHRATES-TIGRIS BASIN .......................................................79 Chapter 11. War on the Euphrates-Tigris: How the Syrian Conflict Started (and Will End) with Water .................................................................................................................................80 Chapter 12. The Energy-Water-Food Nexus and the Syrian Civil War ......................................105 Chapter 13. Shifting Demographics as a Result of Dam Construction in Southeast Turkey ......114 Chapter 14. Alternative Irrigation Management Practices in the Euphrates-Tigris basin of Turkey .................................................................................................................................120 v PART III. WATER ISSUES IN THE RIO GRANDE/BRAVO BASIN ..................................................128 Chapter 15. Toward a Sustainable Management of the Rio Grande/Bravo and Colorado Rivers: Treaties, Institutions, and Minutes .............................................................................129 Chapter 16. The Rio Grande Compact of 1938: Legal and Environmental Challenges of the 21st Century ......................................................................................................................148 Chapter 17. The Energy-Water Nexus in the Paso del Norte Region ..........................................157 Chapter 18. Survey of Paso del Norte Water Stakeholders .........................................................164 PART IV. EUPHRATES-TIGRIS AND PASO DEL NORTE WORKSHOPS .........................................176 Chapter 19. Euphrates-Tigris Workshop .....................................................................................177 Chapter 20. Paso del Norte Workshop .........................................................................................182 CONCLUSION ...............................................................................................................................194 Chapter 21. Defining Sustainability of Engineered Rivers in Arid Lands ..................................195 vi List of Tables Table 8.1. Major Cities in the Rio Conchos Basin .........................................................................47 Table 8.2. Major Reservoirs in the Conchos Basin ........................................................................48 Table 8.3. La Boquilla Reservoir Statistics ....................................................................................49 Table 8.4. Normal Monthly Precipitation in Chihuahua, 1971-2002 ............................................50 Table 8.5. Population in Delicias, Mexico, 1990-2015 ..................................................................50 Table. 9.1. Significant Discharges from Amistad and Falcón Dams .............................................65 Table. 9.2. Water Quality of Rio Grande Segments ......................................................................69 Table. 9.3. Future Water Demand for Region M, 2020-2070 ........................................................70 Table 11.1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nm Report 4-2-13.Indd
    New Mexico TIM PALMER Rio Chama. Cover: Rio Grande. Letter from the President ivers are the great treasury of noted scientists and other experts reviewed the survey design, and biological diversity in the western state-specifi c experts reviewed the results for each state. RUnited States. As evidence mounts The result is a state-by-state list of more than 250 of the West’s that climate is changing even faster than we outstanding streams, some protected, some still vulnerable. The feared, it becomes essential that we create Great Rivers of the West is a new type of inventory to serve the sanctuaries on our best, most natural rivers modern needs of river conservation—a list that Western Rivers that will harbor viable populations of at-risk Conservancy can use to strategically inform its work. species—not only charismatic species like salmon, but a broad range of aquatic and This is one of 11 state chapters in the report. Also available are a terrestrial species. summary of the entire report, as well as the full report text. That is what we do at Western Rivers Conservancy. We buy land With the right tools in hand, Western Rivers Conservancy is to create sanctuaries along the most outstanding rivers in the West seizing once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to acquire and protect – places where fi sh, wildlife and people can fl ourish. precious streamside lands on some of America’s fi nest rivers. With a talented team in place, combining more than 150 years This is a time when investment in conservation can yield huge of land acquisition experience and offi ces in Oregon, Colorado, dividends for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • July 31, 2019 Chair Karen Dunning Vice
    July 31, 2019 Chair Karen Dunning Vice- Chair Joaquin Baca Mike A. Hamman, PE CEO and Chief Engineer 1 2 EL VADO DAM On the Rio Chama - For water storage COCHITI DAM ANGOSTURA Diversion Weir ISLETA Diversion Weir SAN ACACIA Diversion Weir Bosque del Apache Refuge 3 MRGCD Priorities Meet irrigation demands while improving system efficiencies to prepare for shortages Keep Ag lands in production through use of water banking and protecting water rights Operate to minimize debt under the RG Compact. Comply with 2016 BiOp to provide ESA coverage to MRGCD and other water users in the Rio Grande basin. Perform numerous capital improvements including repairing El Vado Dam and constructing engineered levees in the urbanizing areas. Improve and expand inter-governmental partnerships to develop joint projects and leverage funding. 4 2012 to 2018 Hydrology Five of seven years were below average to much below average annual flows at the Otowi gage. 2018 was the lowest runoff since 1956. Rio Grande basin has been in Article VII storage restrictions for most of this period so the District stored allocated relinquishment credit water @El Vado Dam. District exhausted all San Juan-Chama supplies in 2018. San Juan-Chama Project shortages occurred in 2014 - 2018. The District released from El Vado in the fall to Elephant Butte in recent years to reduce potential NM RG Compact debits. 5 Upper Rio Grande Snowpack 2016 -19 6 2019 Water Operations Flows at Otowi gage are on target to exceed 1.5 M a-f making this the third highest runoff season on record.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey-Continues-To-Weaponize-Alok
    www.stj-sy.org Turkey Continues to Weaponize Alok Water amid COVID-19 Outbreak in Syria Turkey Continues to Weaponize Alok Water amid COVID-19 Outbreak in Syria Turkey hampers the urgent response to Coronavirus Pandemic by cutting off water to over 600.000 population in northeast Syria Page | 2 www.stj-sy.org Turkey Continues to Weaponize Alok Water amid COVID-19 Outbreak in Syria 1. Legal analysis a) International Humanitarian Law Water is indispensable to civilian populations. It is not only essential to drink, but also for agricultural purposes and sanitation, all the more important in the wake of the COVID-19 sanitary crisis. Although at first neglecting the significance of water and food for civilian populations caught in armed conflicts, drafters of the Geneva Conventions’ Protocol remedied the gap by including, in Article 54 Additional Protocol I and in Article 14 Additional Protocol II for International and Non-International Armed Conflicts (IACs and NIACs) respectively, the protection of objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population. Involving two states, that of Syria and that of Turkey, the ongoing conflict currently taking place in northeast Syria is of international character. As a result, and in application of these provisions, in IACs: It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, agricultural areas for the production of foodstuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations and supplies and irrigation works, for the specific purpose of denying them for their sustenance value to the civilian population or to the adverse Party, whatever the motive, whether in order to starve out civilians, to cause them to move away, or for any other motive.
    [Show full text]
  • Deposition and Chemistry of Bottom Sediments in Cochiti Lake, North-Central New Mexico
    DEPOSITION AND CHEMISTRY OF BOTTOM SEDIMENTS IN COCHITI LAKE, NORTH-CENTRAL NEW MEXICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4258 Prepared in cooperation with the PUEBLO DE COCHITI DEPOSITION AND CHEMISTRY OF BOTTOM SEDIMENTS IN COCHITI LAKE, NORTH-CENTRAL NEW MEXICO By Jennifer T. Wilson and Peter C. Van Metre U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4258 Prepared in cooperation with the PUEBLO DE COCHITI Albuquerque, New Mexico 2000 CONTENTS Page Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Quality control............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Deposition of bottom sediment.............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Rio Grande Compact of 1938
    The Rio Grande Compact: Douglas R. Littlefield received his bache- Its the Law! lors degree from Brown University, a masters degree from the University of Maryland and a Ph.D. from the University of California, Los Angeles in 1987. His doc- toral dissertation was entitled, Interstate The History of the Water Conflicts, Compromises, and Com- Rio Grande pacts: The Rio Grande, 1880-1938. Doug Compact heads Littlefield Historical Research in of 1938 Oakland, California. He is a research histo- rian and consultant for many projects throughout the nation. Currently he also is providing consulting services to the U.S. Department of Justice, Salt River Project in Arizona, Nebraska Department of Water Resources, and the City of Las Cruces. From 1984-1986, Doug consulted for the Legal Counsel, New Mexico Office of the State Engineer, on the history of Rio Grande water rights and interstate apportionment disputes between New Mexico and Texas for use in El Paso v. Reynolds. account for its extraordinary irrelevancy, Boyd charged, by concluding that it was written by a The History of the congenital idiot, borrowed for such purpose from the nearest asylum for the insane. Rio Grande Compact Boyds remarks may have been intemperate, but nevertheless, they amply illustrate how heated of 1938 the struggle for the rivers water supplies had become even as early as the turn of the century. And Boyds outrage stemmed only from battles Good morning. I thought Id start this off on over water on the limited reach of the Rio Grande an upbeat note with the following historical extending just from southern New Mexicos commentary: Mesilla Valley to areas further downstream near Mentally and morally depraved.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded From
    Hunter-Gatherer Continuity: the Transition from the Epipalaeolithic to the Neolithic in Syria Akkermans, P.M.M.G. Citation Akkermans, P. M. M. G. (2004). Hunter-Gatherer Continuity: the Transition from the Epipalaeolithic to the Neolithic in Syria. In . British Archaeological Reports, Oxford. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/9832 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) License: Leiden University Non-exclusive license Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/9832 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). HUNTER-GATHERER CONTINUITY: THE TRANSITION FROM THE EPIPALAEOLITHIC TO THE NEOLITHIC IN SYRIA Peter M.M.G. AKKERMANS ABSTRACT Small, short-term hunter-gatherer occupations, rather than large, permanently occupied farming villages, were the rule in Syria in the early Neolithic, ca. 10,000-7500 BC. The sedentary lifestyle seems to have appealed only to a small number of people for a very long time. The handful of larger hunter-gatherer settlements of this period, characterized by sometimes long sequences and complex architecture, served ritual purposes, in addition to their role in domestic contexts. The communities, large and small, had much in common with their Epipalaeolithic forebears; profound changes in the forager lifestyle took place late in the Neolithic sequence. RÉSUMÉ Des installations temporaires de saille réduite, occupées par des chasseurs-cueilleurs, semblent avoir été la règle en Syrie au Néolithique ancien (ça. 10 000-7500 BC}, plutôt que des villages permanents occupés par des cultivateurs. La vie sédentaire semble n'avoir attiré pendant longtemps que peu de gens. La poignée d'installations plus importantes datant de cette période, et qui sont caractérisées par une séquence longue et une architecture complexe, ont aussi servi à des activités rituelles à côté de leur rote dans les activités domestiques.
    [Show full text]
  • El Vado Reservoir 2007 Sedimentation Survey
    El Vado Reservoir 2007 Sedimentation Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado July 2008 El Vado Reservoir 2007 Sedimentation Survey prepared by Ronald L. Ferrari U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Water and Environmental Resources Division Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group Denver, Colorado July 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Bureau of Reclamation's (Reclamation) Sedimentation and River Hydraulics (Sedimentation) Group of the Technical Service Center (TSC) prepared and published this report. Ronald Ferrari of the Sedimentation Group and Sharon Nuanes of the Water Resources Planning and Operations Support Group of the TSC conducted the bathymetry survey of the reservoir in June of 2007. Anthony Vigil of Reclamation’s Albuquerque Area Office of the Upper Colorado Region was the study coordinator with additional field support provided by Chama Field Division personnel. Ron Ferrari completed the data processing to generate the new reservoir topography and resulting area-capacity tables. Kent Collins of the Sedimentation Group performed the technical peer review of this documentation. Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Reclamation Report This report was produced by the Bureau of Reclamation’s Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group (Mail Code 86-68240), PO Box 25007, Denver, Colorado 80225-0007, www.usbr.gov/pmts/sediment/.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Key Events: March 2011: Anti-Government Protests Broke
    Timeline of key events: March 2011: Anti-government protests broke out in Deraa governorate calling for political reforms, end of emergency laws and more freedoms. After government crackdown on protestors, demonstrations were nationwide demanding the ouster of Bashar Al-Assad and his government. July 2011: Dr. Nabil Elaraby, Secretary General of the League of Arab States (LAS), paid his first visit to Syria, after his assumption of duties, and demanded the regime to end violence, and release detainees. August 2011: LAS Ministerial Council requested its Secretary General to present President Assad with a 13-point Arab initiative (attached) to resolve the crisis. It included cessation of violence, release of political detainees, genuine political reforms, pluralistic presidential elections, national political dialogue with all opposition factions, and the formation of a transitional national unity government, which all needed to be implemented within a fixed time frame and a team to monitor the above. - The Free Syrian Army (FSA) was formed of army defectors, led by Col. Riad al-Asaad, and backed by Arab and western powers militarily. September 2011: In light of the 13-Point Arab Initiative, LAS Secretary General's and an Arab Ministerial group visited Damascus to meet President Assad, they were assured that a series of conciliatory measures were to be taken by the Syrian government that focused on national dialogue. October 2011: An Arab Ministerial Committee on Syria was set up, including Algeria, Egypt, Oman, Sudan and LAS Secretary General, mandated to liaise with Syrian government to halt violence and commence dialogue under the auspices of the Arab League with the Syrian opposition on the implementation of political reforms that would meet the aspirations of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Publication
    Viewpoints No. 99 Mission Impossible? Triangulating U.S.- Turkish Relations with Syria’s Kurds Amberin Zaman Public Policy Fellow, Woodrow Wilson Center; Columnist, Diken.com.tr and Al-Monitor Pulse of the Middle East April 2016 The United States is trying to address Turkish concerns over its alliance with a Syrian Kurdish militia against the Islamic State. Striking a balance between a key NATO ally and a non-state actor is growing more and more difficult. Middle East Program ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ On April 7 Syrian opposition rebels backed by airpower from the U.S.-led Coalition against the Islamic State (ISIS) declared that they had wrested Al Rai, a strategic hub on the Turkish border from the jihadists. They hailed their victory as the harbinger of a new era of rebel cooperation with the United States against ISIS in the 98-kilometer strip of territory bordering Turkey that remains under the jihadists’ control. Their euphoria proved short-lived: On April 11 it emerged that ISIS had regained control of Al Rai and the rest of the areas the rebels had conquered in the past week. Details of what happened remain sketchy because poor weather conditions marred visibility. But it was still enough for Coalition officials to describe the reversal as a “total collapse.” The Al Rai fiasco is more than just a battleground defeat against the jihadists. It’s a further example of how Turkey’s conflicting goals with Washington are hampering the campaign against ISIS. For more than 18 months the Coalition has been striving to uproot ISIS from the 98- kilometer chunk of the Syrian-Turkish border that is generically referred to the “Manbij Pocket” or the Marea-Jarabulus line.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing the Colorado River and the Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Mexico
    Sharing the Colorado River and the Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Mexico December 12, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45430 {222A0E69-13A2-4985-84AE-73CC3DFF4D02}-R-065134085251065165027250227152136081055238021128244192097047169070027044111226189083158176100054014174027138098149076081229242065001223143228213208120077243222253018219014073197030033204036098221153115024066109133181160249027233236220178084 SUMMARY R45430 Sharing the Colorado River and the December 12, 2018 Rio Grande: Cooperation and Conflict with Nicole T. Carter Specialist in Natural Mexico Resources Policy The United States and Mexico share the waters of the Colorado River and the Rio Grande. A bilateral water treaty from 1944 (the 1944 Water Treaty) and other binational agreements guide Stephen P. Mulligan how the two governments share the flows of these rivers. The binational International Boundary Legislative Attorney and Water Commission (IBWC) administers these agreements. Since 1944, the IBWC has been the principal venue for addressing river-related disputes between the United States and Mexico. The 1944 Water Treaty authorizes the IBWC to develop rules and to issue proposed decisions, Charles V. Stern called minutes, regarding matters related to the treaty’s execution and interpretation. Specialist in Natural Resources Policy Water Delivery Requirements Established in Binational Agreements. The United States’ and Mexico’s water-delivery obligations derive from multiple treaty sources and vary depending on the body of water. Under the 1944 Water Treaty, the United States is required to provide Mexico with 1.5 million acre-feet (AF) of Colorado River water annually. The 1944 Water Treaty also addresses the nations’ respective rights to waters of the Rio Grande downstream of Fort Quitman, TX. It requires Mexico to deliver to the United States an annual minimum of 350,000 AF of water, measured in five-year cycles (i.e., 1.75 million AF over five years).
    [Show full text]
  • The Euphrates River: an Analysis of a Shared River System in the Middle East
    /?2S THE EUPHRATES RIVER: AN ANALYSIS OF A SHARED RIVER SYSTEM IN THE MIDDLE EAST by ARNON MEDZINI THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SCHOOL OF ORIENTAL AND AFRICAN STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF LONDON September 1994 ProQuest Number: 11010336 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11010336 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Abstract In a world where the amount of resources is constant and unchanging but where their use and exploitation is growing because of the rapid population growth, a rise in standards of living and the development of industrialization, the resource of water has become a critical issue in the foreign relations between different states. As a result of this many research scholars claim that, today, we are facing the beginning of the "Geopolitical era of water". The danger of conflict of water is especially severe in the Middle East which is characterized by the low level of precipitation and high temperatures. The Middle Eastern countries have been involved in a constant state of political tension and the gap between the growing number of inhabitants and the fixed supply of water and land has been a factor in contributing to this tension.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Law of the Rio Chama The Utton Transboundary Resources Center 2007 History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation Susan Kelly UNM School of Law, Utton Center Iris Augusten Joshua Mann Lara Katz Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/uc_rio_chama Recommended Citation Kelly, Susan; Iris Augusten; Joshua Mann; and Lara Katz. "History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation." (2007). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/uc_rio_chama/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The Utton Transboundary Resources Center at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law of the Rio Chama by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. SUSAN KELLY, IRIS AUGUSTEN, JOSHUA MANN & LARA KATZ* History of the Rio Grande Reservoirs in New Mexico: Legislation and Litigation" ABSTRACT Nearly all of the dams and reservoirson the Rio Grandeand its tributaries in New Mexico were constructed by the federal government and were therefore authorized by acts of Congress. These congressionalauthorizations determine what and how much water can be stored, the purposesfor which water can be stored, and when and how it must be released. Water may be storedfor a variety of purposes such as flood control, conservation storage (storing the natural flow of the river for later use, usually municipal or agricultural),power production, sediment controlfish and wildlife benefits, or recreation. The effect of reservoir operations derived from acts of Congress is to control and manage theflow of rivers.
    [Show full text]