DOCSLIB.ORG

Parkour Equipment — Safety Requirements and Test Methods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parkour Equipment — Safety Requirements and Test Methods AS EN 16899:2020 EN 16899:2016 Sports and recreational equipment — Parkour equipment — Safety requirements and test methods This national standard is the identical adoption of EN 16899:2016 with the permission of the European Committee for Standardization — CEN, Rue de la Science 23, B — 1040 Brussels, Belgium. AS EN 16899:2020 This Australian Standard® was prepared by CS-101, Sports and recreational facilities and equipment. It was approved on behalf of the Council of Standards Australia on 30 October 2020. This Standard was published on 13 November 2020. The following are represented on Committee CS-101: Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Australian Industry Group Engineers Australia Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia Kidsafe Australia Parks and Leisure Australia Play Australia Scouts Australia Sports and Recreation Victoria Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network University of Technology Sydney This Standard was issued in draft form for comment as DR AS EN 16899:2020. Keeping Standards up-to-date Ensure you have the latest versions of our publications and keep up-to-date about Amendments, Rulings, Withdrawals, and new projects by visiting: www.standards.org.au ISBN 978 1 76113 045 8 AS EN 16899:2020 EN 16899:2016 Sports and recreational equipment — Parkour equipment — Safety requirements and test methods First published as AS EN 16899:2020. COPYRIGHT © CEN 2020 — All rights reserved © Standards Australia Limited 2020 All rights are reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, without the written permission of the publisher, unless otherwise permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). AS EN 16899:2020 ii Preface This Standard was prepared by the Standards Australia Committee CS-101, Sports and recreational facilities and equipment. The objective of this document is to specify requirements for parkour equipment for use mainly by users starting from 8 years of age. Thisplaygrounds document and also multi-use specifies games requirements areas (free for access the installation multi-sports and equipment). maintenance of parkour equipment, including area, height, flow, location and separation from other facilities, including children’s This document is only applicable to parkour equipment, installation and maintenance, but not for example to parkour activities. This document is identical with, and has been reproduced from, EN 16899:2016, Sports and recreational equipment — Parkour equipment — Safety requirements and test methods. As this document has been reproduced from an International Standard, the following applies: (a) In the source text “this European Standard” should read “this document”. (b) A full point substitutes for a comma when referring to a decimal marker. Australian or Australian/New Zealand Standards that are identical adoptions of international normative references may be used interchangeably. Refer to the online catalogue for information on specific Standards. appendices or annexes to which they apply. A “normative” appendix or annex is an integral part of a TheStandard, terms whereas “normative” an “informative” and “informative” appendix are or annexused inis onlyStandards for information to define and the guidance. application of the © Standards Australia Limited 2020 NOTES ENAS EN16899:2016 16899:2020 (E) Content Page European foreword ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1 Scope .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 2 Normative references .................................................................................................................................... 8 3 Terms and definitions ................................................................................................................................... 8 4 Materials and structural integrity.......................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Requirements for materials ..................................................................................................................... 12 4.1.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 4.1.2 Concrete ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 4.1.3 Wood ................................................................................................................................................................. 12 4.1.4 Metals ............................................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.5 Rubbers and synthetics .............................................................................................................................. 13 4.2 Requirements for structural integrity and loading ......................................................................... 13 4.3 Requirements for foundations and groundwork ............................................................................. 15 5 Safety requirements .................................................................................................................................... 15 5.1 Sporting ability.............................................................................................................................................. 15 5.2 Access restrictions ....................................................................................................................................... 15 5.3 Accessible surfaces, profiles and edge chamfers .............................................................................. 17 5.4 Parkour bars and rails ............................................................................................................................... 18 5.5 Enclosed passage ways ............................................................................................................................... 19 5.6 Protection against injuries during movement and falling ............................................................ 19 5.7 Clearances ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 5.8 Entrapment .................................................................................................................................................... 20 5.8.1 Entrapment of hair and clothing ............................................................................................................ 20 5.8.2 Entrapment of the head and neck .......................................................................................................... 20 5.8.3 Completely bound openings ..................................................................................................................... 20 5.8.4 Partially bound and V-shaped openings .............................................................................................. 21 5.8.5 Body and finger clearances ...................................................................................................................... 21 5.9 Separation from other facilities and activities .................................................................................. 21 6 Dimensions ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 6.1 Landings .......................................................................................................................................................... 21 6.2 Impact attenuating surface (IAS) and critical fall height ............................................................... 22 6.3 Maximum height of any element or part of equipment .................................................................. 22 6.4 Maximum free height of fall...................................................................................................................... 22 6.5 Extent of the falling space ......................................................................................................................... 23 7 Installation, inspection and maintenance ........................................................................................... 24 7.1 Installation ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 7.1.1 General ............................................................................................................................................................. 24 7.1.2 Information sign/board ............................................................................................................................. 25 7.1.3 Level mark .....................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CHARTA Charta Parkourone
    ParkourONE CHARTA Charta ParkourONE Preface The following Charta is addressed to all interested in Parkour, ParkourONE, the community and our work. It is a business card to make the ParkourONE community graspable for outsiders, convey contents, as well as unveil our opinions, intentions and structures for the purpose of transparency. We do not regard this Charta a corset in which we are wedged, however as a self-imposed standard to be compared with. Purpose of the Charta is to describe and illuminate the following areas: The history of Parkour is pivotal for the ParkourONE community. We want to narrate our know- ledge about the history of the origin of our art and how we experienced it or interpret it. We affiliate our understanding of Parkour and its associated values directly to David Belle and have great respect for the pioneers of the ADD-culture. Thus, we perceive ourselves as bearer of a spe- cific idea; Parkour cannot be redefined randomly but rather has its own (even conceptual) history. We distinctly declare: David Belle is a living person; as such he and his perception, likewise, will change. We follow David‘s original idea, however, not him as a „Guru“, leader or the like. In other words, even if David Belle would fundamentally modify his understanding of Parkour, our idea of it would basically remain unimpaired - we follow our own path, it is precisely this which we regard an important piece of the initial conception of Parkour. The next chapter recounts the structures of the ParkourONE community, the ParkourONE Com- pany and our own history of genesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Brick-Mansions-Dossier-De-Presse
    2 EUROPACORP PRESENTE Durée : 1h38 DISTRIBUTION PRESSE EuropaCorp Distribution Etienne Lerbret / Anaïs Lelong La Cité du Cinéma - 20, rue Ampère 36, rue de Ponthieu - 75008 Paris 93413 Saint-Denis Cedex Tél. : 01 53 75 17 07 Tél. : 01 55 99 50 00 [email protected] www.europacorp.com [email protected] 3 ’ai eu l’honneur et le plaisir de travailler avec Paul JWalker pendant plusieurs semaines sur mon film Brick Mansions, et cette aventure ensemble restera pour moi inoubliable . Paul était un homme avec un grand cœur et vraiment très sympathique. Un homme dont le charme et le charisme se faisaient sentir dés qu’il arrivait sur le plateau et dont le visage resplendissait à chaque fois sur l’écran. Son talent d’acteur était tellement intense, sensible, drôle et puissant, que cela a été magique de travailler avec lui. Je suis très fier et heureux d’avoir pu le connaître. Camille Delamarre 4 ar ce court texte, je souhaite rendre un dernier hommage Pà Paul Walker, qui nous a brusquement quitté le 30 novembre dernier dans des conditions tragiques alors qu’il œuvrait pour venir en aide aux victimes du typhon Haiyan qui venait de frapper les Philippines. La nouvelle de sa disparition a évidemment été un grand choc pour moi, et je compatis sincèrement à la peine de ses proches. J’ai rencontré Paul l’été dernier sur le tournage de Brick Mansions. Nous nous sommes très vite entendus, malgré la barrière de la langue, et le film doit beaucoup à cette complicité spontanée qui s’est immédiatement établie entre nous.
    [Show full text]
  • Kevin Jean & New Gravity
    PARKOUR Kevin Jean & New Gravity The Sweet Way 13 novembre - 13h30 14 novembre - 10h TÉAT Champ Fleuri À partir du CE2 Dossier ressource David Sarie Professeur relais des TÉAT, île de La Réunion auprès de la délégation académique à l’éducation artistique et à l’action culturelle. Marine Carron Médiatrice culturelle des TÉAT www.lescoulissesdesteat.re www.teat.re 1 © iprod DOSSIER RESSOURCE SOMMAIRE P 3 - A propos du spectacle P 4 - Démarche artistique P 7 - A propos des artistes P 14 - Le parkour P 18 - Pistes pédagogiques Dossier ressource - The Sweet Way 2 A propos du spectacle The Sweet Way est le fruit d’une rencontre initiée par les TÉAT entre le chorégraphe Kevin Jean et les New Gravity, une équipe de traceurs qui font du parkour à La Réunion. Cette rencontre est celle de langages artistiques différents, d’histoires personnelles avec les failles intimes de chacun mais également d’un cheminement du travail des uns et des autres appelés logiquement à converger. Après Emergency chorégraphié par Jérôme Brabant en 2015, les New Gravity reviennent sur scène avec une création plus intimiste, moins acrobatique. Il s’agit de mettre l’énergie non plus au service de performances spectaculaires mais d’une démarche à la recherche de la douceur. Dans cette création, Kevin Jean poursuit un travail initié en 2016 avec Promesses du Magma vers des chorégraphies plus introspectives et apaisées. Il prend le contrepied de ses trois premiers spectacles, La 36ème chambre (2011), Derrière la porte verte (2012) et Des Paradis (2015) qui étaient centrés sur l’entrave et la contrainte.
    [Show full text]
  • Kort Introduktion Til Parkour Og Freerunning
    Kort introduktion til Parkour og Freerunning Parkour 'Parkour' eller 'Le Parkour' er en bevægelsesaktivitet, som handler om at udvikle sig fysisk og mentalt gennem naturlige og ekspressive bevægelser. Den grundlæggende ide bag bevægelserne er at bevæge sig gennem omgivelserne hurtigt og effektivt i flow, dvs. at komme fra punkt A til B, mest effektivt og hurtigst muligt, udelukkende ved brug af kroppen. Miljøet er oftest bymæssigt. Bygninger, gelænder, vægge anvendes til fremdrift på en alternativ måde. Det handler om at se udfordring og muligheder der hvor andre ser begrænsninger og funktionalitet. Parkourudøverne kaldes ’traceurs’, hvilket kan oversættes til projektil eller kugle, som henleder til udøvernes kontinuerlige bevægelser. En rigtig traceur har gjort parkour til en central del af hans livsstil, og lever derved efter filosofien om at opleve frihed. Parkour startede som en subkultur, der udviklede sig i de franske forstæder, men har siden spredt sig ud i hele verden via Internettet. Oprindelse Franskmanden David Belle betegnes som grundlæggeren af parkour. Belles far, Raymond Belle, var løjtnant i Vietnamkrigen. Til at træne sine soldater til at bevæge sig effektivt rundt i junglen, anvendte han træningssystemet ’methode naturalle1’, der grundlagdes af Georg Hébert (1875- 1957).2 Methode naturelle er kort fortalt et system af filosofiske idéer og fysiske metoder, der ontologisk knytter sig til Jean-Jacques Rousseaus (1712-1778) og Johan Gutsmuths (1759-1839) filantropiske tanker om at vende tilbage til naturen og dannelse af det hele menneske3. Systemet bygger på en holistisk verdensforståelse, og tager udgangspunkt i effektivitet, flow og hurtighed.4 Raymond Belle introducerede David Belle for ideerne bag dette træningssystem, hvilket han tog med ud på gaderne i de franske forstæder.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phenomenological Aesthetics of the French Action Film
    Les Sensations fortes: The phenomenological aesthetics of the French action film DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Matthew Alexander Roesch Graduate Program in French and Italian The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Margaret Flinn, Advisor Patrick Bray Dana Renga Copyrighted by Matthew Alexander Roesch 2017 Abstract This dissertation treats les sensations fortes, or “thrills”, that can be accessed through the experience of viewing a French action film. Throughout the last few decades, French cinema has produced an increasing number of “genre” films, a trend that is remarked by the appearance of more generic variety and the increased labeling of these films – as generic variety – in France. Regardless of the critical or even public support for these projects, these films engage in a spectatorial experience that is unique to the action genre. But how do these films accomplish their experiential phenomenology? Starting with the appearance of Luc Besson in the 1980s, and following with the increased hybrid mixing of the genre with other popular genres, as well as the recurrence of sequels in the 2000s and 2010s, action films portray a growing emphasis on the importance of the film experience and its relation to everyday life. Rather than being direct copies of Hollywood or Hong Kong action cinema, French films are uniquely sensational based on their spectacular visuals, their narrative tendencies, and their presentation of the corporeal form. Relying on a phenomenological examination of the action film filtered through the philosophical texts of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Paul Ricoeur, Mikel Dufrenne, and Jean- Luc Marion, in this dissertation I show that French action cinema is pre-eminently concerned with the thrill that comes from the experience, and less concerned with a ii political or ideological commentary on the state of French culture or cinema.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Body-Space-Relation in Parkour: Street Practices and Visual Representations
    8. Body-Space-Relation in Parkour : Street Practices and Visual Representations Ines Braune Abstract Parkour today is a global subcultural scene that combines street with media practices. Parkour consists of a local moment, fundamentally concerned with the materiality of the street, and simultaneously of a global digital discourse, which involves millions of parkour actors. While the spatial knowledge requires a very close knowledge and tactile contact of the surface’s nature of space, the media representations seem to reflect an opposite image, namely the detachedness of space. In this chapter, I will address the question of space-making and spatial practices in Morocco and the relation to parkour’s visual representations. Keywords: Morocco, parkour, body, street Today, parkour is a global cultural scene that combines the street with media practices. In that sense, parkour consists of a local moment, fundamentally concerned with the materiality of the street, and simultaneously of a global digital discourse involving millions of parkour actors, called traceurs, negotiat- ing and re-evaluating their navigation through both physical and digital space. The first and often only contact with parkour, from the point of view of non-practitioners, frequently comes through its visual representations. Spectacular images and videos depict the weightlessness of the body and its detachment from space. Scholars have also weighed in here, analysing the relationship between the body and public space – that is, the interaction and engagement between body and space – while also evaluating parkour as an online culture, assessing the relevance of (digital) media practices within parkour and other youth and sport cultures such as skateboarding (Borden 2001; Buckingham 2009) and surfing (Booth 1996; 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Parkour/Freerunning As a Pathway to Prosocial Change
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington Parkour/Freerunning as a Pathway to Prosocial Change: A Theoretical Analysis By Johanna Herrmann Supervised by Prof Tony Ward A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Forensic Psychology Victoria University of Wellington 2016 ii iii Acknowledgements Special thanks to my supervisor Prof Tony Ward for his constant support and constructive feedback throughout the pleasures and struggles of this project. His readiness to offer an alternative perspective has provided me with many opportunities to grow as a critical thinker, researcher, and as a person. I am grateful to Prof Devon Polaschek, Dr Clare-Ann Fortune, and all members of their lab for encouraging me to pursue an innovative research project, as well as for providing inspiration, insights and connections to other specialist research areas in offender rehabilitation. The German Academic Exchange Service deserves special mention for the financial support that allowed me to take up my dream course of study in the country that is farthest away from my home. Finally, I would like to thank Damien Puddle and Martini Miller for lively discussions, valuable feedback, and sharing the passion regarding research, parkour/freerunning, as well as youth development. iv v Abstract Parkour/freerunning is a training method for overcoming physical and mental obstacles, and has been proposed as a unique tool to engage youth in healthy leisure activities (e.g., Gilchrist & Wheaton, 2011). Although practitioners have started to utilise parkour/freerunning in programmes for youth at risk of antisocial behaviour, this claim is insufficiently grounded in theory and research to date.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contemporary Sublime and the Culture of Extremes: Parkour and Finding the Freedom of the City
    Amanda du Preez the contemporary sublime and the culture of extremes: parkour and finding the freedom of the city BIOGRAPHY Amanda du Preez completed her Doctoral studies at the University of South Africa in 2002 with the title Gendered Bodies and New Technologies. The thesis has one founding premise, namely that embodiment constitutes a non-negotiable prerequisite for human life. Over the past 15 years she has lectured at the University of Pretoria, University of South Africa, the Pretoria Technikon, and the Open Window Art Academy, on subjects ranging from Art History, Visual Communication, and Art Therapy to Open and Distance Learning. She is currently a Senior Lecturer at the University of Pretoria, in the Department of Visual Arts, and teaches Visual Culture and Art History. In 2005 she co-authored South African Visual Culture with J. van Eeden (Van Schaik: Pretoria). The following publications are forthcoming: Gendered Bodies and New Technologies: Re-thinking Embodiment in a Cyber Era (Unisa Press) and Taking a Hard Look: Gender and Visual Culture (Cambridge Scholars Press). Her field of expertise includes gender and feminist theories, virtual and cyber culture, bio-politics, new technologies, and film and 16 visual culture. → The aim is to explore and probe the possible ways in which the discourse of the sublime, as a modern aesthetic category, has mutated and morphed into the postmodern contemporary visual culture of extremes - extreme sports, extreme adventures, and extreme entertainment. The extreme activity of Le Parkour or obstacle-coursing, described by David Belle, its ‘founder’, as finding new and often dangerous ways through the city landscape – scaling walls, roof-running and leaping from building - to building, is identified as an interesting prospect for teasing out the postmodern contemporary visual culture of extremes.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Parkour, Cuerpos Que Trazan Heterotopías Urbanas
    Revista Colombiana de Antropología ISSN: 0486-6525 [email protected] Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia Colombia Leyden Rotawisky, Jennifer Parkour, cuerpos que trazan heterotopías urbanas Revista Colombiana de Antropología, vol. 49, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, 2013, pp. 41-61 Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia Bogotá, Colombia Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=105029983003 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto PARKOUR, CUERPOS QUE TRAZAN heterotopías urbanas JENNIFER LEYDEN ROTAWISKY GRUPO DE INVESTIGACIÓN “ESTUDIOS SOCIALES Y TIC” DE LA FUNDACIÓN FESTIVAL INNOVA MULTIMEDIA, CALI, COLOMBIA [email protected] Resumen ste artículo explora la experiencia incorporada del parkour en Bogotá, esto es, la Eforma en que sus practicantes producen subjetividades nómadas y cómo, a través de transformaciones corporales, crean heterotopías en las ciudades contemporáneas. Definido el parkour como una disciplina que busca construir un cuerpo capaz de realizar movimientos espectaculares con el fin de trazar múltiples trayectos en la ciudad, se examina, por un lado, si esta cultura del movimiento y sus estéticas de la existencia producen cuerpos que trazan líneas de fuga y, por otro, cómo, desde el análisis de los afectos y una antropología del devenir, podemos debatir nuevas formas de habitar la ciudad a partir del movimiento. PALABRAS CLAVE: parkour, heterotopías, autoetnografía, culturas del movimiento, afectos. PARKOUR, BODIES THAT TRACE URBAN HETEROTOPIES Abstract his article explores the embodied experience of parkour in Bogotá, which means the Tway its practitioners produce nomadic subjectivities and create heterotopies in con- temporary cities through the transformation of their bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Hliebing Dissertation Revised 05092012 3
    Copyright by Hans-Martin Liebing 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Hans-Martin Liebing certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Transforming European Cinema : Transnational Filmmaking in the Era of Global Conglomerate Hollywood Committee: Thomas Schatz, Supervisor Hans-Bernhard Moeller Charles Ramírez Berg Joseph D. Straubhaar Howard Suber Transforming European Cinema : Transnational Filmmaking in the Era of Global Conglomerate Hollywood by Hans-Martin Liebing, M.A.; M.F.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2012 Dedication In loving memory of Christa Liebing-Cornely and Martha and Robert Cornely Acknowledgements I would like to thank my committee members Tom Schatz, Charles Ramírez Berg, Joe Straubhaar, Bernd Moeller and Howard Suber for their generous support and inspiring insights during the dissertation writing process. Tom encouraged me to pursue this project and has supported it every step of the way. I can not thank him enough for making this journey exciting and memorable. Howard’s classes on Film Structure and Strategic Thinking at The University of California, Los Angeles, have shaped my perception of the entertainment industry, and having him on my committee has been a great privilege. Charles’ extensive knowledge about narrative strategies and Joe’s unparalleled global media expertise were invaluable for the writing of this dissertation. Bernd served as my guiding light in the complex European cinema arena and helped me keep perspective. I consider myself very fortunate for having such an accomplished and supportive group of individuals on my doctoral committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Enchantment, Play, and Spirituality in Parkour
    religions Article Tracing the Landscape: Re-Enchantment, Play, and Spirituality in Parkour Brett David Potter Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sheridan College, Oakville, ON L6H 2L1, Canada; [email protected] Received: 2 August 2019; Accepted: 26 August 2019; Published: 28 August 2019 Abstract: Parkour, along with “free-running”, is a relatively new but increasingly ubiquitous sport with possibilities for new configurations of ecology and spirituality in global urban contexts. Parkour differs significantly from traditional sports in its use of existing urban topography including walls, fences, and rooftops as an obstacle course/playground to be creatively navigated. Both parkour and “free-running”, in their haptic, intuitive exploration of the environment retrieve an enchanted notion of place with analogues in the religious language of pilgrimage. The parkour practitioner or traceur/traceuse exemplifies what Michael Atkinson terms “human reclamation”—a reclaiming of the body in space, and of the urban environment itself—which can be seen as a form of playful, creative spirituality based on “aligning the mind, body, and spirit within the environmental spaces at hand”. This study will subsequently examine parkour at the intersection of spirituality, phenomenology, and ecology in three ways: (1) As a returning of sport to a more “enchanted” ecological consciousness through poeisis and touch; (2) a recovery of the lost “play-element” in sport (Huizinga); and (3) a recovery of the human body attuned to our evolutionary past. Keywords: parkour; free-running; religion; pilgrimage; poiesis; ecology; urban 1. Introduction Over the past two decades, the sport known as parkour has become a global phenomenon, with groups of practitioners or traceurs emerging from Paris to Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • Parkour - GF Kursus 2017
    Parkour - GF kursus 2017 Undervisere: Signe Skov og Martin Kallesøe Billede: Andy Day Materiale til kurset Det følgende er udvalgte kapitler fra Street Movements kommende bog. Hvis man ønsker at holde sig opdateret på udgivelse kan man skrive sig op til nyhedsbrev fra Street Movement her: https://www.streetmovement.dk/newsletter-signup Hvad er Parkour? Parkour (også kendt som „Art du déplacement“ eller „freerunning“) er en bevægelseskunst, en disciplin, der gør udøveren i stand til at bevæge sig frit igennem et hvilket som helst terræn og miljø, han eller hun måtte møde. Parkour udnytter altså menneskekroppens naturlige færdigheder og gør individet i stand til at raffinere og forbedre disse til konkrete bevægelsesmetoder. Udøveren bliver således i stand til at navigere i et hvilket som helst terræn, hurtigt og effektivt og uden at lide nogen fysisk skade. Parkour fokuserer på udviklingen af de fundamentale færdigheder, der kræves for bevægelse, hvilket inkluderer balance, styrke, koordination, dynamik, udholdenhed, præcision, rumlig bevidsthed og kreativ tænkning. Det er en måde at træne sin krop og sit sind på, for at kunne være så komplet funktionel og effektiv som muligt i den fysiske verden. Det er også en måde at tænke på, der er baseret på selvdisciplin, autonome handlingsmønstre og viljestyrke. Udover denne simple forklaring er parkour dog en disciplin som omhandler selvudvikling på flere niveauer. Det er, en kunstart som lader udøveren opdage hans eller hendes fysiske og mentale potentialer, og er samtidigt en metode til at flytte individets fysiske og mentale grænser. Freerunning I 2003 under optagelserne til den britiske dokumentar "Jump London" foreslår Guillame Pelletier i en samtale med Sébastien Foucan ordet freerunning som betegnelse til det engelske sprog.
    [Show full text]