New Era: the Political Perceptions of the Hindustani Ghadar Party

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Era: the Political Perceptions of the Hindustani Ghadar Party This thesis/project/dissertation has been reviewed for 508 compliance. To request enhancements, please email [email protected]. "NEW ERA": THE POLITICAL PERCEPTIONS OF THE HINDUSTANI GHADAR PARTY Karen Singh Almquist B.S., University ofCalifornia, Davis, 1994 THESIS Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS m HISTORY at CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO SPRING 2009 "NEW ERA": THE POLITICAL PERCEPTIONS OF THE HINDUSTANI GHADAR PARTY A Thesis by Karen Singh Almquist .______, Committee Chair ________, Second Reader Charles Postel Date 11 Student: Karen Singh Almquist: I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual and that this Thesis is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the Thesis. Department of History l1l Abstract of "NEW ERA": THE POLITICAL PERCEPTIONS OF THE HINDUSTANI GHADAR PARTY by Karen Singh Almquist No close examination ofHindustani Ghadar Party literature has been completed in order to ascertain the Ghadar Party view ofthe political relationship between British­ controlled India and America. This thesis will provide an analysis oftheir newsletters and other correspondence in order to understand how their ideological perception evolved in relation to the United States and British India. Specifically, the Hindustani Ghadar Party's view ofthe political relationship between Indian freedom and American freedom will be studied. I will focus on three distinct time periods: from the beginning of the Ghadar Party movement up until the end ofthe quixotic revolution to invade India; during the federal trial of1917-1918; andfinally, the time period between 1918 and the 1920 's where the political perceptions ofthe Ghadar Party diversified. The timeframe of this study is 1913-192 8. My examination shows that the political ideology changed significantly during the years 1913-1925. Notably, the federal trial acted as a milestone for the group's ideology-the pre-war ideas expressing similarities between America and India changed to an idea that America had lost its way and that the Indian expatriates were the true holders ofAmerican virtues offreedom. IV The sources usedfor this thesis include Hindustani Ghadar Party newsletters, autobiographies ofmembers and leaders, political writing ofthe leaders, newspaper excerpts from the New York Times and Berkeley's Daily Californian, trial transcript from the neutrality trial US. v. Franz Bopp, San Francisco Chronicle coverage ofthe federal criminal trial brought against Hindustani Ghadar Party members, general files from the Department ofJustice related to the conspiracy case, records from the Immigration and Naturalization service, andpost-trial telegrams to affiliates in New York City. This thesis references a large number ofprimary sources, several translated specifically for this thesis, in addition to numerous secondary sources as well as the Forei n Relations ofthe United States, Lansing Papers. , Committee Chair V PREF ACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been told that completing a thesis is like giving birth. The gestation ofthis particular work has lasted nearly seven years. I initially believed that the topic was of such great interest, it would be "easy." As months dragged to years and the offspring was born a piece at a time not at once, my once cheery attitude changed dramatically. I dreaded the inevitable, "Done yet?" and answered with a curt, "no." This eventually morphed into, "I'll let you know when it's done," "back off," and (my personal favorite), "I gave that up ages ago." I initially fell in love with this project because it reminded me of my father who told me numerous stories describing his life as a new American-- a Punjabi Sikh immigrant in 1953, alone and with only $7 dollars to his name. My two stories that reminded me of this thesis topic involved his first days in California. The first involved a cross-country train trip to Yuba City. He didn't understand why people kept getting up at regular intervals and going to another car and then came back. A day and a half passed before someone noticed that my father looked exceptionally hungry. An older lady and her husband took pity on my dad and explained that people were going to the dining car to eat; they then invited him to dine with them. The second story occurred after he disembarked from the train. After walking several miles from a train station in Yuba City, he attempted to purchase a soda from a gas station vending machine. Puzzled as to why the machine didn't dispense the soda, my dad inquired and was subsequently chased away by the establishment's owner who had armed himself with a rifle. Vl The antithesis of most Indian immigrant men, he despised being a part of whflt he considered a "backward thinking" Victorian-based community and embraced American life, including, unfortunately, its propensity to overindulge in tobacco. Paradoxically, he clung to the idea that his children would "marry Indian" and that no reason existed for his children to date because marriages would be arranged. He personified the immigrant experience by showing loyalty to his new country and yet retaining some of the cultural characteristics from his birth home. He ultimately sided with his new country in the tug­ of -war but continued to push me along a many-forked path so that I had to choose and defend my identity as the daughter of immigrants-sometimes even to him. My mother continued his crusade after his death. Fully immersed in American life, she realized that my brother and I were also "Amreekan" but lacked the counterweight of "Punjabi-ness." My mom's pioneering spirit has always awed and inspired me since she too immigrated to an unknown country, nearly twenty years after my father, and successfully transformed from "wife" to "provider." Unfortunately, the early Indian immigrants and the Ghadar Party participants did not bring wives to America, and it is their absence that is most acutely felt in this story. Those who assisted me with this project are too many to count, but I would like to give special thanks to my mom, Jyoti, for her translation services; the Desh Bhagat Yagdar Ghadar Party Museum in Jullunder Punjab, India; Ted Sibia who loaned to me numerous documents and brought the Sikh perspective to my attention; to my brother Jesse who listened without criticism or comment on long-distance phone calls as I tried Vil to explain what I was doing and why it was taking me so long; and to David and Sahara who put up with my moodiness and tantrums. It was the memory of my father that finally got me to finish this work. I knew he would be disappointed if,. after seven years, I never saw the product gathering dust on the shelf in the basement of the CSUS library. Lastly, I would like to thank all those family members, friends, acquaintances, and co-workers who pushed me relentlessly by asking, "Are you done with your thesis yet?" I can finally answer, "Yes I am." Vlll DEDICATION This Thesis is dedicated to Pops, Momma and Jesse. IX TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface and Acknowledgements .................................................................................. vi Dedication .................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures .............................................................................................................. xi Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 Overview and Background ................................................................................ 1 Literature Review ..............................................................................................5 2. THE PRE-WAR YEARS: 1910-1917 ................................................................... 14 Immigration and Racism .................................................................................. 14 3. THE FEDERAL TRIAL, UNITED STATES V. RAM CHANDRA, ET. AL: 1917-1918 ...............................................................52 4. POST TRIAL ERA: 1919-1925 ............................................................................72 5. CONCLUSION......................................................................................................90 Bibliography ................................................................................................................92 X LIST OF FIGURES 1. Figure 1 : Hindus Driven Out.. ............................................................................. 25 2. Figure 2: A New Problem for Uncle Sam ........................................................... 27 3. Figure 3: First Sikh Temple in the United States, Circ. 1912 ............................. 34 4. Figure 4: Independent Hindustan ........................................................................46 5. Figure 5: Yugantar............................................................................................... 47 6. Figure 6: Ghadar Issue, June 23, 1917 ............................................................. 59 7. Figure 7: Ghadar Issue, July 1, 1917 .................................................................. 59 8. Figure 8: Ghadar Issue, July 7, 1917 .................................................................. 59 9. Figure 9: Ghadar Issue, June 9, 1917 ................................................................. 59 XI "We get our ideas offreedom not from
Recommended publications
  • Contributions of Lala Har Dayal As an Intellectual and Revolutionary
    CONTRIBUTIONS OF LALA HAR DAYAL AS AN INTELLECTUAL AND REVOLUTIONARY ABSTRACT THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF ^ntiat ai pijtl000pi{g IN }^ ^ HISTORY By MATT GAOR CENTRE OF ADVANCED STUDY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 2007 ,,» '*^d<*'/. ' ABSTRACT India owes to Lala Har Dayal a great debt of gratitude. What he did intotality to his mother country is yet to be acknowledged properly. The paradox ridden Har Dayal - a moody idealist, intellectual, who felt an almost mystical empathy with the masses in India and America. He kept the National Independence flame burning not only in India but outside too. In 1905 he went to England for Academic pursuits. But after few years he had leave England for his revolutionary activities. He stayed in America and other European countries for 25 years and finally returned to England where he wrote three books. Har Dayal's stature was so great that its very difficult to put him under one mould. He was visionary who all through his life devoted to Boddhi sattava doctrine, rational interpretation of religions and sharing his erudite knowledge for the development of self culture. The proposed thesis seeks to examine the purpose of his returning to intellectual pursuits in England. Simultaneously the thesis also analyses the contemporary relevance of his works which had a common thread of humanism, rationalism and scientific temper. Relevance for his ideas is still alive as it was 50 years ago. He was true a patriotic who dreamed independence for his country. He was pioneer for developing science in laymen and scientific temper among youths.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ghadar Movement: Why Socialists Should Learn About It
    Socialist Studies / Études socialistes 13 (2) Fall 2018 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Article THE GHADAR MOVEMENT: WHY SOCIALISTS SHOULD LEARN ABOUT IT RADHA D’SOUZA University of Westminster KASIM ALI TIRMIZEY York University Exile did not suit me, I took it for my homeland When the noose of my net tightened, I called it my nest. Mirza Asadullah Khan “Ghalib” [b. December 1797, Agra, India, d. February 1869, Delhi, India]1 I In May 2016 Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau formally apologized on behalf of the Government of Canada for the 1914 Komagata Maru incident, a singular event in the anti-colonial struggle against the British Empire launched by the newly formed Ghadar Party in North America. The apology came even as the anti-migrant vitriol in the wider society amplified. In late 2013 and again in early 2014, a memorial for the Ghadar martyrs in Harbour Green Park in Vancouver was vandalised twice within months. Notwithstanding the antagonism against immigrants in the public domain, Trudeau’s apology had settled Canada’s accounts with history and able to “move on.” The Trudeau government appointed Harjit Sajjan, a retired Lieutenant Colonel and war veteran in the Canadian Army as the defence minister, the first South Asian to hold the position. In 2011, Harjit Singh was interestingly made the commanding officer of one of the Canadian Army regiments that was historically involved in preventing passengers aboard the Komagata Maru from disembarking. Harjit Sajjan was deployed in Afghanistan where he used his familiarity with language, culture and traditions of the region in favour of imperialist agendas in the region, the very Afghanistan where the Ghadarites from his home state were instrumental in establishing the first government-in-exile of free India a hundred years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule Section
    Rule Section CO 827/2015 Shyamal Middya vs Dhirendra Nath Middya CO 542/1988 Jayadratha Adak vs Kadan Bala Adak CO 1403/2015 Sankar Narayan das vs A.K.Banerjee CO 1945/2007 Pradip kr Roy vs Jali Devi & Ors CO 2775/2012 Haripada Patra vs Jayanta Kr Patra CO 3346/1989 + CO 3408/1992 R.B.Mondal vs Syed Ali Mondal CO 1312/2007 Niranjan Sen vs Sachidra lal Saha CO 3770/2011 lily Ghose vs Paritosh Karmakar & ors CO 4244/2006 Provat kumar singha vs Afgal sk CO 2023/2006 Piar Ali Molla vs Saralabala Nath CO 2666/2005 Purnalal seal vs M/S Monindra land Building corporation ltd CO 1971/2006 Baidyanath Garain& ors vs Hafizul Fikker Ali CO 3331/2004 Gouridevi Paswan vs Rajendra Paswan CR 3596 S/1990 Bakul Rani das &ors vs Suchitra Balal Pal CO 901/1995 Jeewanlal (1929) ltd& ors vs Bank of india CO 995/2002 Susan Mantosh vs Amanda Lazaro CO 3902/2012 SK Abdul latik vs Firojuddin Mollick & ors CR 165 S/1990 State of west Bengal vs Halema Bibi & ors CO 3282/2006 Md kashim vs Sunil kr Mondal CO 3062/2011 Ajit kumar samanta vs Ranjit kumar samanta LIST OF PENDING BENCH LAWAZIMA : (F.A. SECTION) Sl. No. Case No. Cause Title Advocate’s Name 1. FA 114/2016 Union Bank of India Mr. Ranojit Chowdhury Vs Empire Pratisthan & Trading 2. FA 380/2008 Bijon Biswas Smt. Mita Bag Vs Jayanti Biswas & Anr. 3. FA 116/2016 Sarat Tewari Ms. Nibadita Karmakar Vs Swapan Kr. Tewari 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism and Internationalism (Ca
    Comparative Studies in Society and History 2012;54(1):65–92. 0010-4175/12 $15.00 # Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2012 doi:10.1017/S0010417511000594 Imagining Asia in India: Nationalism and Internationalism (ca. 1905–1940) CAROLIEN STOLTE Leiden University HARALD FISCHER-TINÉ Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich What is this new cult of Asianism, at whose shrine more and more incense is being offered by vast numbers of thinking Asiatics, far and near? And what has this gospel of Asianism, rightly understood and properly interpreted, to do with the merely political cry of ‘Asia for the Asiatics’? For true it is, clear to all who have eyes to see and ears to hear, that Asia is fast developing a new consciousness of her specific mission, her orig- inal contribution to Euro-America. ———Nripendra Chandra Banerji1 INTRODUCTION Asianisms, that is, discourses and ideologies claiming that Asia can be defined and understood as a homogenous space with shared and clearly defined charac- teristics, have become the subject of increased scholarly attention over the last two decades. The focal points of interest, however, are generally East Asian varieties of regionalism.2 That “the cult of Asianism” has played an important Acknowledgments: Parts of this article draw on a short essay published as: Harald Fischer-Tiné, “‘The Cult of Asianism’: Asiendiskurse in Indien zwischen Nationalismus und Internationalismus (ca. 1885–1955),” Comparativ 18, 6 (2008): 16–33. 1 From Asianism and other Essays (Calcutta: Arya Publishing House, 1930), 1. Banerji was Pro- fessor of English at Bangabasi College, Calcutta, and a friend of Chittaranjan Das, who propagated pan-Asianism in the Indian National Congress in the 1920s.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Freedom Struggle (1911-17)
    Indian Freedom Struggle (1911-17) Modern History Modern History: XI -Indian Freedom Struggle (1911-17) Delhi Darbar(1911) ● Set up to welcome King George V. ● Decisions taken during this were: ● Annulment of Partition of Bengal but Separation of Bihar & Orissa from Bengal ● Transfer of capital from Calcutta to Delhi in 1912 Modern History: XI -Indian Freedom Struggle (1911-17) Previous Year Question 2014.The partition of Bengal made by Lord Curzon in 1905 lasted until (a) The World War I when Indian troops were needed by the British and the partition war ended (b) King George V abrogated Curzon’s Act at the Royal Durbar in Delhi,1911 (c) Gandhiji launched a Civil Disobedience movement (d) The Partition of India, in 1947 when East Bengal became East Pakistan Modern History: XI -Indian Freedom Struggle (1911-17) The Ghadr ● The Ghadr Party was a revolutionary group organized around a weekly newspaper. ● The Ghadr had its headquarters at San Francisco. ● These revolutionaries included mainly ex-soldiers & peasants who had migrated from the Punjab in search of better employment opportunities. ● They were based in the US & Canadian cities along the western (Pacific) coast. Modern History: XI -Indian Freedom Struggle (1911-17) The Ghadr (Cont...) ● Pre-Ghadr revolutionary activity had been carried on by Ramdas Puri, G.D. Kumar, Taraknath Das, Sohan Singh Bhakna & Lala Hardayal who reached there in 1911. ● To carry out revolutionary activities, the earlier activists had set up a 'Swadesh Sevak Home' at Vancouver & 'United India House' in Seattle. ● Tarak Nath Das, an Indian student, & one of the 1st leaders of Indian community in North America to start a paper (called Free Hindustan) realized that while the British government was keen on Indians going to Fiji to work as laborers for British planters, it did not want them to go to North America where they might be infected by ideas of liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Marxism and the Colonial World Can Best Be Described As a Missed Encounter, Since the Political Traject
    Socialist Studies / Études socialistes 13 (2) Fall 2018 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Article IN THE SHADOW OF GHADAR: MARXISM AND ANTI-COLONIALISM IN COLONIAL PUNJAB AMMAR ALI JAN University of Cambridge Abstract The Ghadr Party, an eclectic group of diasporic Punjabis, was perhaps one of the most significant political movements led by emigre Indians in the early twentieth century. Designated as one of the biggest threats to colonial rule in the 1910s, the Ghadr Party spread its operations over five continents, and repeatedly committed acts of sabotage aimed at colonial officials from India. By the 1920s, however, the birth of popular movements in India marginalized various groups that believed in the spectacular actions of a vanguard as a strategy for overcoming the stifling impact of colonial rule. Members of the party, eager to find a foothold in the changed political scenario, opened discussions for building a popular front in Punjab, with many returning to the country to participate in such an endeavour. In this article, I study the encounter between the Ghadarite tradition and the communist movement in colonial Punjab through the writings of Sohan Singh Josh, who attempted to bring these two traditions together to produce a viable political project. I argue that Ghadar's encounter with Marxism not only influenced the former, but also radically transformed Marxism itself, particularly on questions of History, violence and volition. Keywords Anti-colonialism, Punjab, Marxism, Communism, Intellectual History The relationship between Marxism and the colonial world can best be described as a missed encounter, since the political trajectories of late 19th century “social democracy” in Europe and the burgeoning critiques of colonial rule by anti-colonial intellectuals and organizations did not cross paths until the 1920s.
    [Show full text]
  • Hindu-German Conspiracy Trial And
    German Interests in INDIA 1900 • Germany second largest trade partner for India. India exported cotton, rice, jute and wool. Imported sugar, iron, steel, paper, match sticks and synthetic color Later, India imported parts of railway carriages, machines and motor cars • Economic sector “German Asiatic Bank” was opened in Calcutta in 1896. • 1900, India(Calcutta) received half million Mark as an aid to the recovery from a devastating famine • 1911 German Crown Prince was conferred upon the Honour of Doctorate (at Calcutta universty. Jatin Mukerjee met Crown prince and asked arms for revolution German Interests in INDIA 1900,s • 1909; Germans and Indian revolutionaries in England. Per Savarkar “His warning to leave leave England 1n 1909 after mureder of Sir Curzon wyllie had actually come from a German Agent” ( Emile C Brown page 149). Gustav Steinhart was chief German Intelligence • 1911; Bernhardi a German General in his Book “ Germany Next war” indicates that Hindu Population of Bengal having nationalist and revolutionary tendency along with Pan- islamists might create very grave danger to capable of shaking the foundation of England ,s high position in the world. 1913 • Nov 15, 1913 – First Gadar writes “The Germans have a great sympathy with our movement and liberty because they and ourselves have a common enemy. In future Germany can draw assistance from us and they can render a great assistance also” *. • On Dec 31, 1913 – in a meeting in Sacramento German Consulate FrenZ Boop sitting on Stage Lala Hardyal l declares “If I am turned
    [Show full text]
  • An Appraisal of Ubaid-Allah Sindhi's Mahabharat Sarvrajia Party And
    Journal of Political Studies, Vol.20, Issue - 1, 2013, 159:177 A Voice from the Margins: An Appraisal of Ubaid-Allah Sindhi’s Mahabharat Sarvrajia Party and its Constitution Tanvir Anjum♣ Abstract Ubaid-Allah Sindhi is among those very few political thinkers and activists of the twentieth-century India who were initially associated with the traditional theological seminaries but their political vision was marked by liberalism and open- mindedness. He established a non-communal political party— Mahabharat Sarvrajia Party in 1924 in order to translate his political ideals into practice. The Party Constitution envisaged the idea of a unique form of confederal form of government for the country. It also presented an outline of a socio-economic order which was derived from a reconciliation of Socialist ideals with the Quran and Shah Wali-Allahi thought. However, he is among one of the least understood and often misinterpreted Muslim thinkers of India. Thus, there is a need to appreciate and reevaluate the political modernism in his thought and vision. Key-words: Ubaid-Allah Sindhi, Mahabharat Sarvrajia Party, The Constitution of the Federated Republics of India, Confederalism, Socialism Ubaid-Allah Sindhi (1872-1944) of Deoband School is among those very few political thinkers and activists who were trained in traditional madrassahs or theological seminaries, but had a thorough understanding of their contemporary political and economic ideologies, and were endowed with a deep vision and tremendous political foresight. Unlike most of his fellow ulama or scholars and political leaders of Deoband School, he was receptive to modernism, though in a selective manner. It is for this very reason that he has been hailed as ‘the most broad-minded Muslim scholar of South Asia after Shah Wali-Allah of Delhi’ by Said Ahmad Akbarabadi, an illustrious pupil of Sindhi and a renowned scholar of Islam (see introduction in Aslam, n.d., p.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Culture BA Semester II Paper I : South Asia
    Asian Culture B.A. Semester II Paper I : South Asia (1870-1919) Department of Western History University of Lucknow (Course Instructor: Prof. Abha Trivedi) The Rise of Revolutionary Nationalism After the outbreak of 1857, it took Indians a while to raise arms against the British Government. The First incident of this kind was remarked in 1872, when Kuka Sikhs of Punjab under the leadership of Satguru Ram Singh ji, demanded for Socio-Religious reforms. Vasudev Balwant Phadke was a renowned Revolutionary. He formed a Revolutionary group called, “Ramoshi'' collaborating Bhil, Koli and Dhaangar tribes. He raided rich and corrupt people so he can help the poor with money and other provisions. On 10th and 11th may 1879, he raided and looted a sum of 1.5 lakh rupees. Therefore, he was branded as Dakait (Robber). He was like the Robin Hood of the 19th century India. He was captured in July 1879 and sentenced to jail. He died 4 years later. After a while, on 22 June 1897, Damodar Hari Chapekar and Bal Krishna Hari Chapekar shot Plague commissioner of Poona, Mr. Walter Charles Rand and his escort officer, Lt. Ayerst dead. They were arrested for assassinating these Officers and sentenced to death and executed by the gallows. Note:- Chapekar brothers were: Damodar Hari, Bal Krishna Hari and Vasudev Hari. Movement in Bengal: The people who initiated movement in Bengal, called themselves as “Bhadralok Samaj” (Noblemen’s Society). The Pioneers of the Revolutionary movement were Barindra Kumar Ghosh and Bhupendar Nath Dutta. Varinder wrote a pamphlet named “Bhawani Mandir”. To teach people how to fight, they published “Rules of Modern Warfare.” A Secret revolutionary organization, Anushilan Samiti was founded in Bengal, 1902.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of Kirti and the Kirti-Kisan Party and the Lasting Legacy of the Ghadar Movement, 1918-1928
    249 Amrit Deol: Kirti Kisan Party Workers and Peasants Unite: The Formation of Kirti and the Kirti-Kisan Party and the Lasting Legacy of the Ghadar Movement, 1918-1928 Amrit Deol University of California, Merced _______________________________________________________________ Following the Hindu-German Conspiracy Trial of 1917, many Ghadar members from the United States and Canada relocated to the political landscape of Punjab and influenced the rise of the Punjabi left in the 1920s. This article examines how the Ghadar movement inspired the creation of the leftist journal Kirti under the editoriship of Santokh Singh in 1926, making it one of the first political journals to advocate for both freedom from the British Raj and peasant and workers’ rights in Punjab. The publication of the journal was followed by the establishment of the Kirti-Kisan Party by Sohan Singh Josh in 1928, a political organization that rallied for the rights of workers and peasants through a Marxist framework. This article demonstrates how both political entities took ideological, practical, and financial influences from the Ghadar movement. _______________________________________________________________ “To fulfill a particular task one should rely upon one’s own efforts.”1 (Santokh Singh, Kirti, 1926) “Proletarians of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!”2 (Sohan Singh Josh, Kirti, 1928) Introduction In 1926, Rashpal Singh from Desh Sewak-Jalandhar welcomed Kirti to the world - a new leftist newsletter published in Amritsar, Punjab, which tackled peasant and labor issues within Punjab and abroad. In honor of its first publication, Singh wrote: It is with honor that I congratulate the creators of Kirti.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern India 1857-1972
    mathematics HEALTH ENGINEERING DESIGN MEDIA management GEOGRAPHY EDUCA E MUSIC C PHYSICS law O ART L agriculture O BIOTECHNOLOGY G Y LANGU CHEMISTRY TION history AGE M E C H A N I C S psychology Modern India (1857 – 1969) Subject: MODERN INDIA (1857 – 1969) Credits: 4 SYLLABUS Historical background – British rule and its legacies, National movement, Partition and Independence Origins and goals of the Indian National Congress, Formation of the Muslim League Roles played by Gandhi, Nehru, Jinnah and the British in the development of the Movement for independence Challenges faced by the Government of India, Making the Constitution, Political, Economic and Social developments from 1950-1990, The Nehru Years – challenges of modernization and diversity, Brief on Indira Gandhi Developments post-1990, Economic liberalization, Rise of sectarianism and caste based politics, Challenges to internal security Foreign Policy: post – Nehru years, Pakistan and Kashmir, Nuclear policy, China and the U. S. Suggested Readings: 1. Ramachandra Guha, Makers of Modern India, Belknap Press 2. Akash Kapur, India Becoming: A Portrait of Life in Modern India, Riverhead Hardcover 3. Bipin Chandra, History Of Modern India, Orient Blackswan 4. Barbara D. Metcalf, Thomas R. Metcalf, A Concise History of Modern India, Cambridge University Press CHAPTER 1 IMPERIALISM, COLONIALISM AND NATIONALISM STRUCTURE Learning objectives Imperialism and colonialism: A theoretical perspective Imperialism: Its effects The rise of national consciousness The revolt of 1857 Colonialism:
    [Show full text]
  • Title Transnational Ghadr Movement : a Diasporic Dimension Author(S) BHATTE, Pallavi Citation 歴史文化社会論講座紀要
    Title Transnational Ghadr Movement : A Diasporic Dimension Author(s) BHATTE, Pallavi Citation 歴史文化社会論講座紀要 (2013), 10: 157-173 Issue Date 2013-02 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/171640 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Transnational Ghadr Movement 157 Transnational Ghadr Movement: A Diasporic Dimension Pallavi BHATTE Introduction The narratives of India’s national struggle for independence focus mainly on the mainstream internal efforts of natives of the subcontinent. Indian scholars have largely reiterated the role of revolutionaries in foreign lands, however, with an India-centric dialogue. While they do broadly accommodate the role played by Indian freedom fighters beyond the boundaries of British India, they do perhaps tend to be partial and limited. Indeed, inclusive in the narratives is an international arena serving as a backdrop to plot the multiple locations on a global map where actors championed their anti-colonial cause. Moreover, probably not surprisingly, although this viewpoint explains the extensive reach of the independence movement as a whole it is inconsiderate in incorporating the transnational dimension. Specifically scholarship of the Ghadr movement is a classic example that has fallen prey to such marginality. Almost every piece of work on Indian revolutionaries away from their ancestral home discusses the Ghadr movement in the US, the conspiracy theory of the Indo-German collaboration, or the radical Indo-Irish connections on American soil. Some Indian works provide compelling evidential source of foundation for tracing the Indian revolutionary movement beyond Indian boundaries. 1) They have underplayed the diasporic contribution toward the independence movement, by treating actors as mere Indian expatriates who had left Indian shores rather than viewing them as a part of a proactive community in their adopted homes.
    [Show full text]