DOCSLIB.ORG

Sea2sea" Under the Trans- European Transport Network (TEN-T)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sea2sea Feasibility Analysis and evaluation of the viability of multimodal corridor of the approved Action "Sea2Sea" under the Trans- European Transport Network (TEN-T) 1st Deliverable - D1 Current State Analysis and Long-Term Forecast October - December 2014 ADK | AKKT | EVIAM | Milionis-Iliopoulou ΕΒΙΑΜ ΕΠΕ ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΣ ΜΗΛΙΩΝΗΣ - ΚΩΣΤΟΥΛΑ ΗΛΙΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ *The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Feasibility Analysis and evaluation of the viability of multimodal corridor of the approved Action "Sea2Sea" under the Trans- European Transport Network (TEN-T )- Deliverable D1 - Current State Analysis and Long-Term Forecast TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 11 2 REGIONAL CURRENT STATE ANALYSIS ............................................................................ 12 2.1 REGIONAL STATUS ANALYSIS - PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE ...... 12 2.1.1 Basic geographic, spatial and development characteristics per region .......... 13 2.1.2 Basic population and development rates – Comparative perspective ........... 25 2.1.3 The regions of the study area in selected European typologies ..................... 33 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PERSPECTIVE .............................................................................. 39 2.2.1 Current Environmental status of greater area – Greece ................................. 39 2.2.2 Current Environmental status of greater area – Bulgaria ............................... 63 2.3 ECONOMICS PERSPECTIVE ...................................................................................... 87 2.3.1 Analysis of the current status of the region. ................................................... 87 3 CORRIDOR CURRENT STATE ANALYSIS .......................................................................... 102 3.1 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE...................................................... 102 3.1.1 Urban and rural development ....................................................................... 104 3.1.2 Economy ........................................................................................................ 105 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PERSPECTIVE ............................................................................ 108 3.2.1 Current state of Corridor's Environment – Greece Section .......................... 108 3.2.2 Current state of Corridors Environment – Bulgaria Section .......................... 113 3.3 TRANSPORTATION PERSPECTIVE ........................................................................ 119 3.3.1 Initial corridor definition ............................................................................... 119 3.3.2 The Ports ........................................................................................................ 120 3.3.3 Port Accessibility via land networks - Summary ............................................ 139 3.3.4 Rail Networks ................................................................................................. 139 3.3.5 Focus on Bottlenecks of the Railway network .............................................. 144 3.3.6 The Network Model Representation ............................................................. 157 3.4 ECONOMICS PERSPECTIVE .................................................................................... 160 3.4.1 Analysis of the current status of the corridor ............................................... 160 4 CORRIDOR CURRENT COMPETITIVENESS ASSESSMENT................................................ 165 4.1.1 International trade ........................................................................................ 165 4.1.2 Overview of Black Sea Basin transport infrastructure .................................. 166 ADK | AKKT | EVIAM | Milionis-Iliopoulou 2 Feasibility Analysis and evaluation of the viability of multimodal corridor of the approved Action "Sea2Sea" under the Trans- European Transport Network (TEN-T )- Deliverable D1 - Current State Analysis and Long-Term Forecast 4.1.3 Economic assessment of the current competitiveness of the corridor ........ 170 4.1.4 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 173 5 REGIONAL AND CORRIDOR LONG-TERM FORECAST ..................................................... 175 5.1 FRAMEWORKS AND PLANS OF SPATIAL PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMING ........................................................................................ 175 5.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 175 5.1.2 Framework / plans of spatial planning and development............................. 176 5.1.3 Implementation of Operational Programmes ............................................... 215 5.1.4 Synopsis ......................................................................................................... 231 5.2 Transportation - Future Development ............................................................. 235 5.2.1 Future developments in infrastructure and traffic ....................................... 235 5.2.2 General Conclusions ...................................................................................... 242 ADK | AKKT | EVIAM | Milionis-Iliopoulou 3 Feasibility Analysis and evaluation of the viability of multimodal corridor of the approved Action "Sea2Sea" under the Trans- European Transport Network (TEN-T )- Deliverable D1 - Current State Analysis and Long-Term Forecast List of Figures Figure 1: European Maritime Region Typology (schematic map) according to the ESaTDOR Project ............................................................................................ 34 Figure 2: The Dijkstra-Poelman Urban-Rural Typology according to the EDORA Project .............................................................................................................. 36 Figure 3: The Structural Typology according to the EDORA Project ........................ 37 Figure 4: The Performance Typology according to the EDORA Project ................... 38 Figure 5: Natura Network Map in Greece (without 12 SPAs declared in January 2008) ................................................................................................................ 41 Figure 6: Natura Areas (Source: Εgnatia) ................................................................ 45 Figure 7: Wetlands Ramsar (Source: Observatory Egnatia Odos) ........................... 47 Figure 8: Wildlife Refuges in the area of REMT - shown in blue are shelters in IP interest (except for the area of Thassos) Source: Oikoskopio) ......................... 48 Figure 9: EPAMTH Zones (Source: Organization Management http://www.fd- nestosvistonis.gr/) ............................................................................................ 52 Figure 10: National Parks Study Area (source: Oikoskopio) .................................... 53 Figure 11: Natura areas and Evros Ramsar wetland area park ............................... 56 Figure 12: Dadia National Park Map - Privacy Protection Zones (Source: National Park Management Body Dadia http://dadianp.maps.arcgis.com/)..................... 59 Figure 13: Protected areas per region of Bulgaria (Source: National Regional Development Strategy (NRDS)) ....................................................................... 64 Figure 14: Road and rail network in Bulgaria in Area of Interest .............................. 66 Figure 15: Protected areas network Natura by Region of Bulgaria (Source: National Regional Development Strategy (NRDS)) ........................................................ 67 Figure 16: Protected areas network Natura (Src: Natura Net) ................................. 68 Figure 17: Main areas Natura region of interest (Source background: Google earth- http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/) .................................................................... 71 Figure 18: Nature Park Strandhza ........................................................................... 73 Figure 19: Nature Park Zlatni pjasatsi ..................................................................... 75 Figure 20: Annual average concentration of PM2.5 in 2011 (Air quality in Europe — 2013 report’’ ΕΕΑ European Environment Agency) .......................................... 79 Figure 21: Concentrations of PM10 and NO2 in Bulgaria (Source: Air pollution fact sheet 2013 ΕΕΑ European Environment Agency) ............................................ 80 Figure 22: Annual average SO2 concentrations for 2011 (Air quality in Europe — 2013 report’’ ΕΕΑ European Environment Agency) .......................................... 81 Figure 23: Vulnerable areas of the coastal zone area of interest ............................. 86 Figure 24: Black Sea Basin population, 2000 ........................................................ 105 Figure 25: Port of Varna- East Terminal ................................................................ 123 Figure 26: Transport map of existing rail connection in the greater area of the port of Burgas ........................................................................................................... 124 Figure 27: Satellite map of existing road connections to the port of Burgas .......... 124 ADK | AKKT | EVIAM | Milionis-Iliopoulou 4 Feasibility Analysis and evaluation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Company Profile
    www.ecobulpack.com COMPANY PROFILE KEEP BULGARIA CLEAN FOR THE CHILDREN! PHILIPPE ROMBAUT Chairman of the Board of Directors of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of AGROPOLYCHIM JSC-Devnia e, ECOBULPACK are dedicated to keeping clean the environment of the country we live Wand raise our children in. This is why we rely on good partnerships with the State and Municipal Authorities, as well as the responsible business managers who have supported our efforts from the very beginning of our activity. Because all together we believe in the cause: “Keep Bulgaria clean for the children!” VIDIO VIDEV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of NIVA JSC-Kostinbrod,VIDONA JSC-Yambol t ECOBULPACK we guarantee the balance of interests between the companies releasing A packed goods on the market, on one hand, and the companies collecting and recycling waste, on the other. Thus we manage waste throughout its course - from generation to recycling. The funds ECOBULPACK accumulates are invested in the establishment of sustainable municipal separate waste collection systems following established European models with proven efficiency. DIMITAR ZOROV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Owner of “PARSHEVITSA” Dairy Products ince the establishment of the company we have relied on the principles of democracy as Swell as on an open and fair strategy. We welcome new shareholders. We offer the business an alternative in fulfilling its obligations to utilize packaged waste, while meeting national legislative requirements. We achieve shared responsibilities and reduce companies’ product- packaging fees. MILEN DIMITROV Procurator of ECOBULPACK s a result of our joint efforts and the professionalism of our work, we managed to turn AECOBULPACK JSC into the largest organization utilizing packaging waste, which so far have gained the confidence of more than 3 500 companies operating in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: BULGARIA October 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Bulgaria (Republika Bŭlgariya). Short Form: Bulgaria. Term for Citizens(s): Bulgarian(s). Capital: Sofia. Click to Enlarge Image Other Major Cities (in order of population): Plovdiv, Varna, Burgas, Ruse, Stara Zagora, Pleven, and Sliven. Independence: Bulgaria recognizes its independence day as September 22, 1908, when the Kingdom of Bulgaria declared its independence from the Ottoman Empire. Public Holidays: Bulgaria celebrates the following national holidays: New Year’s (January 1); National Day (March 3); Orthodox Easter (variable date in April or early May); Labor Day (May 1); St. George’s Day or Army Day (May 6); Education Day (May 24); Unification Day (September 6); Independence Day (September 22); Leaders of the Bulgarian Revival Day (November 1); and Christmas (December 24–26). Flag: The flag of Bulgaria has three equal horizontal stripes of white (top), green, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Settlement and Empire: According to archaeologists, present-day Bulgaria first attracted human settlement as early as the Neolithic Age, about 5000 B.C. The first known civilization in the region was that of the Thracians, whose culture reached a peak in the sixth century B.C. Because of disunity, in the ensuing centuries Thracian territory was occupied successively by the Greeks, Persians, Macedonians, and Romans. A Thracian kingdom still existed under the Roman Empire until the first century A.D., when Thrace was incorporated into the empire, and Serditsa was established as a trading center on the site of the modern Bulgarian capital, Sofia.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practices in Target Libraries from Plovdiv District
    Good Practices in Target Libraries from Plovdiv District 4 September 2011, Plovdiv, Ivan Vazov Public Library LIST OF MEETING PARTICIPANTS No. Name Organization/Institution Settlement 1. Ana Belcheva Municipal administration Rakovski Rakovski 2. Angelina Stavreva Ivan Vazov Public Library, Methodology Dept. Plovdiv 3. Ani Sirakova Library at Sts. Cyril and Methodius PC Parvomay 4. Anka Bekirova Library at Iskra Public Chitalishte Kaloyanovo 5. Apostol Stanev Library at Sokolov Public Chitalishte Panicheri 6. Valya Stoyanova Library at N.Y. Vaptsarov Public Chitalishte Stamboliyski 7. Vasilka Bahchevanska Library at Vasil Kolev Public Chitalishte Trilistnik 8. Vaska Mincheva Library at Probuda Public Chitalishte Krichim 9. Vaska Tonova Ivan Vazov Public Library, Children’s Dept. Plovdiv 10. Velizar Petrov Regional Information Center Plovdiv 11. Vera Endreva Library at Hristo Botev Public Chitalishte Zlatitrap 12. Vera Kirilova NAWV Plovdiv 13. Gergana Vulcheva Library at Ivan Vazov Public Chitalishte Iskra 14. Gyurgena Madzhirova Library at Lyuben Karavelov Public Chitalishte Kurtovo Konare 15. Daniela Kostova Municipal administration Asenovgrad Asenovgrad 16. Darina Markova Library at Hristo Botev Public Chitalishte Dabene 17. Dzhamal Kichukov “Zora” Library Laki 18. Dimitar Minev Ivan Vazov Public Library, Director Plovdiv 19. Dobrinka Batinkova Library at N.Y. Vaptsarov Public Chitalishte Kuklen 20. Donka Kumanova Library at Sts. Cyril and Methodius PC Shishmantsi 21. Elena Atanasova Library at Ivan Vazov Public Chitalishte Plovdiv 22. E lena Batinkova Library at Samorazvitie Public Chitalishte Brestnik 23. Elena Mechkova Library at N.Y. Vaptsarov Public Chitalishte Topolovo 24. Elena Raychinova Library at Ivan Vazov Public Chitalishte Sopot 25. Emilia Angelova Library at Sts. Cyril and Methodius PC Parvomay page 1 No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Issued by Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion Or Belief Purpose Preparation for the Report to the 46Th Session of Human Rights Council
    Avrupa Batı Trakya Türk Federasyonu Föderation der West-Thrakien Türken in Europa Federation of Western Thrace Turks in Europe Ευρωπαϊκή Ομοσπονδία Τούρκων Δυτικής Θράκης Fédération des Turcs de Thrace Occidentale en Europe NGO in Special Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations Member of the Fundamental Rights Platform (FRP) of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights Member of the Federal Union of European Nationalities (FUEN) Call for input: Report on Anti-Muslim Hatred and Discrimination Deadline 30 November 2020 Issued by Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief Purpose Preparation for the report to the 46th Session of Human Rights Council Submitted by: Name of the Organization: Federation of Western Thrace Turks in Europe (ABTTF) Main contact person(s): Mrs. Melek Kırmacı Arık E-mail: [email protected] 1. Please provide information on what you understand by the terms Islamophobia and anti-Muslim hatred; on the intersection between anti-Muslim hatred, racism and xenophobia and on the historical and modern contexts, including geopolitical, socio-and religious factors, of anti-Muslim hatred. There are numerous definitions of Islamophobia which are influenced by different theoretical approaches. The Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research, which annualy publish European Islamophobia Report, uses the working definition of Islamophobia that theorizes Islamophobia as anti-Muslim racism. The Foundation notes that Islamophobia is about a dominant group of people aiming at seizing, stabilizing and widening their power by means of defining a scapegoat – real or invented – and excluding this scapegoat from the resources/rights/definition of a constructed ‘we’.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020/860 of 18 June 2020 Amending the Annex to Implementing
    L 195/94 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 19.6.2020 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2020/860 of 18 June 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (notified under document C(2020) 4177) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption (3), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU (4) lays down animal health control measures in relation to African swine fever in certain Member States, where there have been confirmed cases of that disease in domestic or feral pigs (the Member States concerned). The Annex to that Implementing Decision demarcates and lists certain areas of the Member States concerned in Parts I to IV thereof, differentiated by the level of risk based on the epidemiological situation as regards that disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Ust Dergi Sayi 17 Layout 1
    THE MAKING OF THE RHODOPEAN BORDERS AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE POMAK IDENTITIES IN THE BALKANS Cengiz HAKSÖZ Ph.D. Candidate Department of Anthropology University of Pittsburgh Ph.D. Candidate Department of Sociology Middle East Technical University Abstract: Nation-state borders are a phenomenon became part of the international relations as well as the everyday lives of people. Even though borders, in theory, are constructed entities state borders directly or indirectly influence identity formation of communities. The Pomaks are Slavic-speaking Muslim population living historically in the 47 Rhodope Mountains region on the Bulgarian-Greek border. In Bulgarian, Greek, and Turkish nation-building processes, Pomak identity was continuously contested by all the three states. For the Bulgarian state, the Pomaks are ethnic Bulgarians who forcefully converted to Islam. Thus, if this process can be reversed, they can become “real” Bulgarians, again. For the Greek state, the Pomaks are descendants of Hellenic tribes who were assimilated by more populous Slavic-speaking populations in the region. In Turkey, the Pomaks are regarded as descendants of pre-Ottoman Turkic tribes, such as Kumans and Pechenegs, who later assimilated by Slavic-speaking populations. This paper discusses how the modern Rhodopean borders were created and how their creation influenced and shaped the construction of Pomak identity in Bulgaria, Greece, and Turkey. The first part focuses on the making of the modern Rhodope Mountains borders between Bulgaria and Greece. The second part evaluates the identity construction processes of Pomaks in Bulgaria, Greece, and Turkey. Finally, the paper discusses how the making of state borders, directly and indirectly, influenced the construction of Pomak identity boundaries in Bulgaria, Greece, and Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Identification of Microcystin
    toxins Article Morphological and Molecular Identification of Microcystin-Producing Cyanobacteria in Nine Shallow Bulgarian Water Bodies Mariana Radkova 1, Katerina Stefanova 1, Blagoy Uzunov 2,* , Georg Gärtner 3 and Maya Stoyneva-Gärtner 2 1 AgroBio Institute, Bulgarian Agricultural Academy, BG-1164 Sofia, Bulgaria; [email protected] (M.R.); [email protected] (K.S.) 2 Faculty of Biology, Department of Botany, Sofia University, BG-1164 Sofia, Bulgaria; [email protected] 3 Institute of Botany, Innsbruck University, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: buzunov@uni-sofia.bg Received: 6 November 2019; Accepted: 6 January 2020; Published: 8 January 2020 Abstract: The paper presents results from the first application of polyphasic approach in studies of field samples from Bulgaria. This approach, which combined the conventional light microscopy (LM) and molecular-genetic methods (based on PCR amplified fragments of microcystin synthetase gene mcyE), revealed that almost all microcystin-producers in the studied eutrophic waterbodies belong to the genus Microcystis. During the molecular identification of toxin-producing strains by use of HEPF × HEPR pair of primers, we obtained 57 sequences, 56 of which formed 28 strains of Microcystis, spread in six clusters of the phylogenetic tree. By LM, seven Microcystis morphospecies were identified (M. aeruginosa, M. botrys, M. flos-aquae, M. natans, M. novacekii, M. smithii, and M. wesenbergii). They showed significant morphological variability and contributed from <1% to 98% to the total biomass. All data support the earlier opinions that taxonomic revision of Microcystis is needed, proved the presence of toxigenic strains in M. aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii, and suppose their existence in M.
    [Show full text]
  • L392 Official Journal
    Official Journal L 392 of the European Union Volume 63 English edition Legislation 23 November 2020 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1737 of 14 July 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 as regards the inclusion of certain drug precursors in the list of scheduled substances (1) . 1 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1738 of 16 November 2020 approving non- minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Asparago verde di Altedo’ (PGI)) . 8 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1739 of 20 November 2020 amending and correcting Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/761 as regards the quantities available for tariff rate quotas for certain agricultural products included in the WTO schedule of the Union following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union, a tariff quota for poultrymeat originating in Ukraine and a tariff quota for meat of bovine animals originating in Canada . 9 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1740 of 20 November 2020 setting out the provisions necessary for the implementation of the renewal procedure for active substances, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 (1) . 20 DECISIONS ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1741 of 20 November 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (notified under document C(2020) 8266) (1) .
    [Show full text]
  • L6 Official Journal
    Official Journal L 6 of the European Union Volume 63 English edition Legislation 10 January 2020 Contents II Non-legislative acts INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ★ Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Albania on certain aspects of air services . 1 ★ Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Armenia on certain aspects of air services . 2 ★ Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan on certain aspects of air services . 3 ★ Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and Bosnia-Herzegovina on certain aspects of air services . 4 ★ Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on certain aspects of air services . 5 ★ Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Georgia on certain aspects of air services . 6 ★ Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the State of Israel on certain aspects of air services . 7 REGULATIONS ★ Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/11 of 29 October 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures as regards information relating to emergency health response (1) . 8 (1) Text with EEA relevance. Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Page 1 of 6
    Bulgaria Page 1 of 6 Bulgaria International Religious Freedom Report 2007 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Constitution provides for freedom of religion; however, the law prohibits the public practice of religion by unregistered groups. The Constitution also designates Eastern Orthodox Christianity as the "traditional" religion. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the Government during the period covered by this report, and government policy contributed to the generally free practice of religion. There were some reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious belief or practice. Discrimination, harassment, and general public intolerance, particularly in the media, of some religious groups remained an intermittent problem. The U.S. Government discusses religious freedom issues with the Government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. Section I. Religious Demography The country has an area of 42,855 square miles and a population of 7.7 million. The majority of citizens, estimated at 85 percent, identify themselves as Orthodox Christians. Muslims comprise the largest minority, estimated at 13 percent; other minorities include Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Gregorian-Armenian Christians, and others. Among the ethnic-Turkish minority, Islam is the predominant religion. Academic research estimated that up to 40 percent of the population is atheist or agnostic. Official registration of religious organizations is handled by the Sofia City Court; it reported that 12 new denominations were registered between February 2006 and February 2007, bringing the total number of registered religious groups to 85 denominations in addition to the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (BOC), an increase of more than 15 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Modèle Fiche Information
    BURGAS MUNICIPALITY 8000 Burgas, 26 „Alexandrovska” Str. Phone: +359(0)56840915-19; Fax: +359(0)56841314 www.burgas.bg; e-mail: [email protected] REPORT on PEER REVIEW on Environment and resource efficiency hosted by Burgas Municipality Topic: Improving the use of Burgas Municipality potential to reduce the quantities of landfilled waste by implementing practices to prevent their formation and increasing the share of separately collected recyclable waste Dates: 2-3 December 2020 Venue: Online meeting per Zoom 1. Background information for Burgas Municipality Burgas Municipality, with an area of 559 sq. km., is located in South-eastern Bulgaria, on the Black Sea coast, surrounding the most extensive bay along the Bulgarian Black Sea coast - Burgas Bay. By its geographical location, the municipality occupies a significant place in the transport and communication system of the country. Important transport corridors pass through its territory in the directions east and west, as well as connections to the northern and southern part of Bulgaria. The city of Burgas is the last point of the Trakia Highway Route (A1) – providing a fast connection to the Capital. The total number of the population in Burgas municipality according to data of the NSI /National statistical institute/as of 31.12.2019, amounts to 208,235 people, which represents 50.9% of the population of Burgas district and 3% of the total population of the country. The municipality ranks fourth in number of populations in Bulgaria. Burgas Municipality consists of 12 settlements, two cities – Burgas and Balgarovo and 10 villages. In the municipal centre - the city of Burgas live 97,6% of the inhabitants of the municipality, and the remaining 2.4% in the other settlements of the territory.
    [Show full text]