DOCSLIB.ORG

ABSTRACT SHAH, JAY AMIT. Design

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ABSTRACT SHAH, JAY AMIT. Design ABSTRACT SHAH, JAY AMIT. Design, Fabrication, and Experimental Demonstration of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Spherical Motor (PMSSM) for High-Mobility Servomechanisms. (Under the direction of Dr. Gregory Buckner). Over the past two decades there have been significant advancements in the field of robotics. We live in a multi degree-of-freedom (DOF) world where electro-mechanical systems are capable of complex movements, with their benefits spread across many industries. In-spite of these advancements we are still heavily reliant on single DOF technology. Traditionally multi DOF motion has been achieved by combining single DOF actuators in series or parallel configurations. These arrangements are often accompanied by computationally expensive inverse kinematics, singularities in the workspace and reduced power densities since each link bears the added weight of the actuators of the succeeding links. Multi DOF actuators can provide a potential solution with enabling rotations about any arbitrary axis. This research aims at developing a multi DOF actuator, a permanent magnet synchronous spherical motor. © Copyright 2020 by Jay Amit Shah All Rights Reserved Design, Fabrication, and Experimental Demonstration of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Spherical Motor by Jay Amit Shah A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Mechanical Engineering Raleigh, North Carolina 2020 APPROVED BY: _______________________________ ______________________________ Dr. Gregory Buckner Dr. Larry Silverberg Committee Chair _______________________________ Dr. Matthew Bryant BIOGRAPHY Jay Shah pursued a master’s degree with the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at the North Carolina State University. He received his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Mumbai. He spent a year and half of his master’s program working at the Electro-mechanics Research Lab. His research under the guidance of Dr. Gregory Buckner, focused on the development of a multi degree-of-freedom actuator with potential applications in the field of robotics. He currently works as a Mechatronic Systems Integration Engineer at Auris Health Inc. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank several researchers and staff in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at North Carolina State University for their key contributions to the work described here. Dr. Gregory Buckner (Director, Electro-Mechanics Research Laboratory) advised the author throughout the course of this work and supported the research. John Cameron (Research Fabrication Facility Supervisor) and Vincent Chicarelli (Specialty Trades Technician) provided expert design guidance, tireless efforts, and quality workmanship on machining the stator poles and rotor. Samuel Miller (doctoral student, Electro-Mechanics Research Laboratory) designed, built and implemented the control hardware (Fig. 18), designed and implemented the control algorithm (Eqns. 6-16), conducted the experimental work (Figs. 21-24), and authored the associated subsections in this manuscript. Shaphan Jernigan (Lab Manager, Electro-Mechanics Research Laboratory) co-authored the Introduction of this manuscript. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vi Chapter 1: Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Rotor Support ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Actuation ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Bearing Selection ................................................................................................................ 3 1.5 Orientation Sensing ............................................................................................................. 4 Chapter 2: Methods ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Stator Design ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Stator Fabrication ............................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Rotor Design .................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Rotor Fabrication ............................................................................................................. 20 2.5 Control Theory ................................................................................................................. 22 2.6 Control Electronics .......................................................................................................... 25 Chapter 3: Results...................................................................................................................... 30 3.1 Step Response .................................................................................................................. 30 3.2 Time Varying Trajectory ................................................................................................ 32 Chapter 4: Discussion ................................................................................................................ 34 References ................................................................................................................................... 36 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Optimized Stator Pole Dimensions ............................................................................ 9 Table 2 Normalized Permanent Magnet Location ................................................................. 19 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Goldberg Polyhedron (3,0) used for the stator design ............................................... 5 Figure 2 Stator pole geometry .................................................................................................. 6 Figure 3 FEA simulations for flux density ............................................................................... 8 Figure 4 FEA simulations for field lines of magnetic field ...................................................... 8 Figure 5 Regular hexagonal pole assembly ............................................................................ 10 Figure 6 Stator pole winding process ..................................................................................... 11 Figure 7 Complete stator assembly ......................................................................................... 11 Figure 8 Cross-sectional view of the PMSSM ........................................................................ 12 Figure 9 Bearing load as a function of magnet size ................................................................ 13 Figure 10 Example implementation of the Nearest Neighbor Method ..................................... 15 Figure 11 Workspace representation of 0.38 Steradians .......................................................... 17 Figure 12 Genetic Algorithm overview .................................................................................... 18 Figure 13 Determining permanent magnet polarities ............................................................... 19 Figure 14 Rotor fabrication process .......................................................................................... 20 Figure 15 Rotor assembly ......................................................................................................... 21 Figure 16 Complete PMSSM assembly .................................................................................... 21 Figure 17 Euler angle representation ........................................................................................ 22 Figure 18 Electronic system diagram ....................................................................................... 26 Figure 19 Geometric patterns used for grouping stator poles ................................................... 27 Figure 20 Phase groupings with stator pole polarities .............................................................. 29 Figure 21 Experiment results: current tracking of the 1st phase ............................................... 30 Figure 22 Experiment results: step response ............................................................................ 31 vi Figure 23 Snapshots of the reference trajectory ....................................................................... 32 Figure 24 Experiment results: time-varying trajectory tracking ............................................... 32 Figure 25 Experiment results: phase currents during trajectory tracking ................................. 33 vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview As robotic technologies and applications continue to advance, there is a growing need for innovative actuators with increased kinematic mobility and power density. Most robotic systems have
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Dual-Rotor Generator for a Counter-Rotating Wind Turbine
    energies Article Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Dual-Rotor Generator for a Counter-Rotating Wind Turbine Filip Kutt *,† , Krzysztof Blecharz † and Dariusz Karkosi ´nski † Faculty of Electrical and Control Engineering, Gda´nskUniversity of Technology, 80-233 Gda´nsk,Poland; [email protected] (K.B.); [email protected] (D.K.) * Correspondence: fi[email protected]; Tel.: +48-58-347-19-39 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 31 March 2020; Accepted: 26 May 2020; Published: 2 June 2020 Abstract: Coaxial counter-rotating propellers have been widely applied in ships and helicopters for improving the propulsion efficiency and offsetting system reactive torques. Lately, the counter-rotating concept has been introduced into the wind turbine design. Distributed wind power generation systems often require a novel approach in generator design. In this paper, prototype development of axial-flux generator with a counter-rotating field and armature is presented. The design process was composed of three main steps: analytical calculation, FEM simulation and prototype experimental measurements. The key aspect in the prototype development was the mechanical construction of two rotating components of the generator. Sturdy construction was achieved using two points of contact between both rotors via the placement of the bearing between the inner and outer rotor. The experimental analysis of the prototype generator has been conducted in the laboratory at the dynamometer test stand equipped with a torque sensor. The general premise for the development of such a machine was an investigation into the possibility of developing a dual rotor wind turbine. The proposed solution had to meet certain criteria such as relatively simple construction of the generator and the direct coupling between the generator and the wind turbines.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-09-27-2-Generator-Basics
    Generator Basics Basic Power Generation • Generator Arrangement • Main Components • Circuit – Generator with a PMG – Generator without a PMG – Brush type –AREP •PMG Rotor • Exciter Stator • Exciter Rotor • Main Rotor • Main Stator • Laminations • VPI Generator Arrangement • Most modern, larger generators have a stationary armature (stator) with a rotating current-carrying conductor (rotor or revolving field). Armature coils Revolving field coils Main Electrical Components: Cutaway Main Electrical Components: Diagram Circuit: Generator with a PMG • As the PMG rotor rotates, it produces AC voltage in the PMG stator. • The regulator rectifies this voltage and applies DC to the exciter stator. • A three-phase AC voltage appears at the exciter rotor and is in turn rectified by the rotating rectifiers. • The DC voltage appears in the main revolving field and induces a higher AC voltage in the main stator. • This voltage is sensed by the regulator, compared to a reference level, and output voltage is adjusted accordingly. Circuit: Generator without a PMG • As the revolving field rotates, residual magnetism in it produces a small ac voltage in the main stator. • The regulator rectifies this voltage and applies dc to the exciter stator. • A three-phase AC voltage appears at the exciter rotor and is in turn rectified by the rotating rectifiers. • The magnetic field from the rotor induces a higher voltage in the main stator. • This voltage is sensed by the regulator, compared to a reference level, and output voltage is adjusted accordingly. Circuit: Brush Type (Static) • DC voltage is fed External Stator (armature) directly to the main Source revolving field through slip rings.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Exlar T-LAM™ Servo Motors Have Become the New Standard of Comparison for Maximum Torque Density and Power Efficiency
    Why the Exlar T-LAM™ Servo Motors have Become the New Standard of Comparison for Maximum Torque Density and Power Efficiency By Richard Welch Jr. - Consulting Engineer November 3, 2008 Introduction According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 63-65% of a typical manufacturing plant’s monthly electric bill goes to pay for all the electricity consumed by the electric motors operating in the plant. Hence, with a steady rise in electricity cost along with constant pressure to lower manufacturing cost, if you ask plant managers to describe the three most important words associated with electric motors they quickly respond by saying its “efficiency”, “efficiency” and “efficiency”. As you can see, no matter how you arrange these three words “efficiency” is always at the top of your list. Furthermore, systems and design engineers who build equipment used in manufacturing plants constantly search for electric motors that provide the “most bang for least buck”. Therefore, producing electric motors that have the highest obtainable torque density (i.e., continuous torque output per motor volume) along with maximum power efficiency has become a real challenge for all motor manufacturers. To meet this challenge for both high torque density and maximum power efficiency, Exlar has developed its T-LAM™ stator that’s now being used in all SLM and SLG brushless DC servo motors and in all GSX and GSM rotary actuators [1]. Hence, the focus of this paper is to show you graphically why the T-LAM servo motor has become the new standard of comparison for torque density and power efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • ON Semiconductor Is
    ON Semiconductor Is Now To learn more about onsemi™, please visit our website at www.onsemi.com onsemi and and other names, marks, and brands are registered and/or common law trademarks of Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC dba “onsemi” or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. onsemi owns the rights to a number of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and other intellectual property. A listing of onsemi product/patent coverage may be accessed at www.onsemi.com/site/pdf/Patent-Marking.pdf. onsemi reserves the right to make changes at any time to any products or information herein, without notice. The information herein is provided “as-is” and onsemi makes no warranty, representation or guarantee regarding the accuracy of the information, product features, availability, functionality, or suitability of its products for any particular purpose, nor does onsemi assume any liability arising out of the application or use of any product or circuit, and specifically disclaims any and all liability, including without limitation special, consequential or incidental damages. Buyer is responsible for its products and applications using onsemi products, including compliance with all laws, regulations and safety requirements or standards, regardless of any support or applications information provided by onsemi. “Typical” parameters which may be provided in onsemi data sheets and/ or specifications can and do vary in different applications and actual performance may vary over time. All operating parameters, including “Typicals” must be validated for each customer application by customer’s technical experts. onsemi does not convey any license under any of its intellectual property rights nor the rights of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Tradeoff Between Efficiency and Melting for a High
    1 Tradeoff between Efficiency and Melting for a High-Performance Electromagnetic Rail Gun William C. McCorkle and Thomas B. Bahder Army Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898 USA Email: [email protected] Abstract— We estimate the temperature distribution in the and the historical lack of understanding of the reasons for the rails of an electromagnetic rail gun (EMG) due to the confinement low endurance of the gun rails in service, sometimes limited to of the current in a narrow surface layer resulting from the skin one shot at maximum energies before replacement is needed. effect. In order to obtain analytic results, we assume a simple geometry for the rails, an electromagnetic skin effect boundary For high-performance EMGs, in order to increase the arma- edge that propagates with the accelerating armature, and a ture velocity while keeping the length of the rails fixed, the current carrying channel controlled by magnetic field diffusion current pulse during firing must be shorter and have a higher into the rails. We compute the temperature distribution in the average amplitude, causing a stronger skin effect in the rails, rails at the time that the armature leaves the rails. For the range which leads to an increase in Joule heating of the rails. In this of exit velocities, from 1500 m/s to 5000 m/s, we find the highest temperatures are near the gun breech. After a single gun firing, paper, we show that the EMG efficiency is higher at higher the temperature reaches the melting temperature of the metal velocity, but there is increased melting of the rails, leading to rails in a layer of finite thickness near the surface of the rails, a tradeoff between efficiency of the EMG and melting of the for rails made of copper or tantalum.
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsator Design for Electromagnetic Railgun System
    COMPULSATOR DESIGN FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC RAILGUN SYSTEM By Bryan Bennett Senior Project Electrical Engineering Department Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo June, 2012 ABSTRACT This project designed, fabricated, and partially tested a compensated pulsed alternator (compulsator) to power an electromagnetic rail gun (EMRG) in a multidisciplinary team. The EMRG team includes two master’s AERO students, two senior EE students, and three senior ME students. Design of the compulsator began with research through conference and research papers. This design was changed throughout the project as system analysis and component testing exposed unforeseen system limitations. While original specifications were not met, all fabricated components but one, the stator, were completed using Cal Poly’s facilities and the project’s limited available budget. Experimental verification of calculations and system modeling were not obtained because the compulsator was fully assembled at the time of this writing, but the necessary measurements and testing procedures have been outlined. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………i Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………ii List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………………….iii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………………..iv Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………….v Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….1 Background………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………...6 Design……………………………………………………………………………………..………7 Total System Design……………………………………………………………...……….7
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla Files His Patents for the Electric Motor
    NUMBERS DON’T LIE_BY VACLAV SMIL OPINION corresponding lecture at the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, one of IEEE’s predecessor societies. However, it was Tesla, helped with generous financ- ing from U.S. investors, who designed not only the AC induction motors but also the requisite AC transformers and dis- tribution system. The two basic patents for his polyphase motor were granted 130 years ago this month. He filed some three dozen more by 1891. In a polyphase motor, each electromag- netic pole in the stator—the stationary housing—has multiple windings, each of which carries alternating current that’s out of phase with current in the other windings. The differing phases induce a current flow that turns the rotor. George Westinghouse acquired Tesla’s AC patents in July 1888. A year later Westinghouse Co. began selling the world’s first small electrical appliance, a fan powered by a 125-watt AC motor. Tesla’s first patent was for a two-phase MAY 1888: motor; modern households now rely on many small, single-phase electric TESLA FILES HIS PATENTS motors. The larger, more efficient three- phase machines are common in indus- trial applications. Mikhail Osipovich FOR THE ELECTRIC MOTOR Dolivo-Dobrovolsky, a Russian engi- neer working as the chief electrician for Germany’s AEG, built the first three- ELECTRICAL DEVICES ADVANCED by leaps and bounds in the 1880s, phase induction motor in 1889. which saw the first commercial generation in centralized power plants, Today, some 12 billion small, non- the first durable lightbulbs, the first transformers, and the first (limited) industrial motors are sold every year, urban grids.
    [Show full text]
  • DC Motor, How It Works?
    DC Motor, how it works? You can find DC motors in many portable home appliances, automobiles and types of industrial equipment. In this video we will logically understand the operation and construction of a commercial DC motor. The Working Let’s first start with the simplest DC motor possible. It looks like as shown in the Fig.1. The stator is a permanent magnet and provides a constant magnetic field. The armature, which is the rotating part, is a simple coil. Fig.1 A simplified D.C motor, which runs with permanent magnet The armature is connected to a DC power source through a pair of commutator rings. When the current flows through the coil an electromagnetic force is induced on it according to the Lorentz law, so the coil will start to rotate. The force induced due to the electromagnetic induction is shown using 'red arrows' in the Fig.2. Fig.2 The electromagnetic force induced on the coils make the armature coil rotate You will notice that as the coil rotates, the commutator rings connect with the power source of opposite polarity. As a result, on the left side of the coil the electricity will always flow ‘away ‘and on the right side , electricity will always flow ‘towards ‘. This ensures that the torque action is also in the same direction throughout the motion, so the coil will continue rotating. Fig.3 The commutator rings make sure a uni-directional current flows through the left and right part of the coil Improving the Torque action But if you observe the torque action on the coil closely, you will notice that, when the coil is nearly perpendicular to the magnetic flux, the torque action nears zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Stator Segmentation and Manufacturing Degradation on the Performance of IPM Machines, Using Icare Electrical Steels
    World Electric Vehicle Journal Vol. 8 - ISSN 2032-6653 - ©2016 WEVA Page WEVJ8-0450 EVS29 Symposium Montréal, Québec, Canada, June 19-22, 2016 Effect of stator segmentation and manufacturing degradation on the performance of IPM machines, using iCARe® electrical steels Jan Rens1, Sigrid Jacobs2, Lode Vandenbossche1, Emmanuel Attrazic3 1ArcelorMittal Global R&D Gent, J.Kennedylaan 3, 9060 Zelzate, Belgium 2(corresponding author) ArcelorMittal Global R&D, J. Kennedylaan 51, 9042 Gent, Belgium, [email protected] 3ArcelorMittal St Chély d’Apcher, Route du Fau de Peyre, 48200 St Chély d’Apcher, France Summary In order to increase the performance of permanent magnet electrical machines and/or reduce cost, improved manufacturing techniques are continuously being searched for by machine designers. Segmenting the stator core offers the possibility to simplify the winding process, to increase slot fill factor or to minimise wastage of electrical steel. This paper investigates some of the benefits that can be gained from stator segmentation, and highlights the effect of magnetic degradation due to the increased requirement on punching, through a series of finite element models. Keywords: Efficiency, motor design, power density, permanent magnet motor, materials 1 Introduction The design choice made for traction electrical machines has a significant influence on its final production cost and performance. With regards to the production of the stator core, recent publications have demonstrated the potential advantages of a segmented approach, where the stator core is assembled from a number of sub-stacks, as demonstrated in Figs 1 (a) to (d) [1-4]. The topology from Fig. 1(a) shows a segment comprising an entire tooth where adjacent segments are interconnected in the back-iron.
    [Show full text]
  • Brushless DC Motor Primer
    Brushless DC Motor Primer By Muhammad Mubeen [email protected] Last Revision: July, 2012 1 Foreword This primer on brushless DC motors has been written for the benefit of senior management executives of OEM companies in whose products, the electric motor is a major cost and feature component. The focus of this primer is permanent magnet brushless DC motors (BLDC), sometimes referred to as ECM (Electronically Commutated Motors). The material has been written from the stand point of top management. It has technical depth but is really meant to be used as a tool for senior management to get a quick and broad overview of the technology and the underlying pros and cons. It is my intent that the material presented will quickly make the reader well versed with the technology and give him or her a deep understanding of major impact of BLDC technology on their own competitiveness. Most important of all, the material is designed to point out ways in which the technology can be harnessed to advantage. Conversely, the material also points out the perils of ignoring these profound changes in the motor technology landscape. Muhammad Mubeen Radford, VA July, 2012 2 Overview of the Electric Motor Business in North America According to some estimates, the overall consumption of electric motors of all types in North America will be $18 Billion by 2007 up from $14 Billion in 2002 with an annual growth rate of 5%. The breakdown of this overall picture of consumption by motor technology looks as follows for 20071. 2007 Electric Motor Consumption in North America Total $18B All Other, $1.4, 8% AC Induction, $5.0, 28% BLDC, $4.1, 23% Brush DC, $7.4, 41% The consumption of electric motors is heavily influenced by the automotive industry and consumer applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Stator Design of Doubly Salient Permanent Magnet Generator for Enhancing the Electromagnetic Performance
    Article Optimal Stator Design of Doubly Salient Permanent Magnet Generator for Enhancing the Electromagnetic Performance Vannakone Lounthavong, Warat Sriwannarat, Apirat Siritaratiwat and Pirat Khunkitti * Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +66-86-636-5678 Received: 10 July 2019; Accepted: 19 August 2019; Published: 20 August 2019 Abstract: An optimal stator design technique of a three-phase doubly salient permanent magnet generator (DSPMG) for improving the soutput power is proposed. The stator configuration was optimally designed by adjusting the stator pole depth and stator pole arc. The trapezoid outer stator tip was also designed. Then, the output characteristics of the designed DSPMG including the flux linkage, electromotive force (EMF), harmonic, cogging torque, efficiency, magnetic flux distribution and voltage regulation were characterized by using the finite element method. Results were compared to the original structure in the literature. It was found that the flux linkage, EMF, cogging torque, and efficiency of the proposed DSPMG were significantly improved after the stator pole depth and stator pole arc were suitably modified. Further details of optimal stator pole depth and stator pole arc are presented. The EMF produced by the optimal proposed structure was 47% higher than that of the conventional structure, while 56% cogging torque improvement and 20% increased efficiency were achieved. The EMF generated by the proposed structure was classified in the high- range scale compared to the other existing models. The symmetrical magnetic flux distribution of all structures was indicated. The voltage regulation of the modified structure was also significantly improved from the conventional model.
    [Show full text]
  • Projectile 45
    4%.* A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A HYPERSONIC REAL-GAS FACILITY FINAL REPORT Submitted To: Grants Officer NASA Langley Research Center Office of Grants and University Affairs Hampton, VA 23665 Grant d NAG1-721 January 1, 1987 to May 31, 1987 Submitted by: J. H. Gully Co-principal Investigator M. D. Driga Co-principal Investigator W. F. Weldon Co-principal Investigator (NBSA-CR-180423) A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A N88-10043 HYPEBSOUIC RBAL-SAS FACILITY Final Report (Texas tJniv.1 154 p Avail: NTIS AC A08/tlP A01 CSCL 14s Uacl as G3/09 0 103727 Center for Electromechanico The University of Texas at Austin Balcones Research Center EME 1.100, Building 133 Austin, TX 78758-4497 (512)471-4496 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 Discu ssion 2 HIGH ENERGY LAUNCHER FOR BALLISTIC RANGE 5 Introduction 5 Launch Concepts and Theory 6 COAXIAL ACCELERATOR 9 Introduction 9 System Description 10 System Analysis 13 Main Parameters 13 Launcher Configurations 15 Electromechanical Considerations 17 Power Supplies 22 Electromagnetic Principles 25 STATOR WINDING DESIGN 31 Starter Coil (Secondary Current Initiation) 35 Power Supply Characteristics 41 Projectile 45 RAILGUN ACCELERATOR 50 Introduction 50 Background 50 Railgun Construction 53 Synchronous Switching of Energy Store 58 Initial Acceleration 58 Method for Decelerating Sabot 60 Power Source 60 Inductor Design 69 Railgun Performance 75 Sa bot De sign 75 Plasma Bearings 78 Armature Consideration 80 Maintenance 82 Model Design 82 INSTRUMENTATION 84 Electromagnetic Launch Model Electronics 84 Data Acquisition 85 Circuit
    [Show full text]