DOCSLIB.ORG

Nagorno-Karabagh: Legal Aspects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NAGORNO KARABAGH LEGAL ASPECTS SHAHEN AVAKIAN Moscow 2015 llegalegal aaspects.inddspects.indd 1 229.04.20159.04.2015 116:30:346:30:34 UDK 341(479.25) Published: “MIA” publishers SHAHEN AVAKIAN “NAGORNO KARABAGH: LEGAL ASPECTS” Fifth Edition, Moscow 2015 The study covers the legal aspects of Nagorno Karabagh problem. It examines the issues of Law as they affected the legal status of Nagorno Karabagh. The author is an expert of International Law. He has graduated from the Paris Sorbonne University and is specialized in International Public Law and International Organizations law. This study is the fi fth revised edition and contains additional information and updates. The publications of the earlier editions of this research are also availble in Armenian, French, Russian, Arabic, Greek and Spanish. © 2015 SHAHEN AVAKIAN llegalegal aaspects.inddspects.indd 2 229.04.20159.04.2015 116:30:346:30:34 Content Foreword 5 Basic Facts 6 1. Pre-Soviet Status 8 2. Sovietization Period 13 3. Nagorno Karabagh Under Perestroika 16 4. Rejection of Soviet Heritage by the Republic of Azerbaijan 20 5. Sovereignty of Nagorno Karabagh Under Domestic Legislation of the Former USSR 22 6. Azerbaijan’s Policy of Ethnic Cleansings as a violation of International Law 26 7. Does Azerbaijan’s internal Legislation on Nagorno Karabagh Comply with International Law? 34 8. Independent State of Nagorno Karabagh Under International Law 41 Concluding Remarks 47 ANNEX 1 List of Legal Acts and Materials on Nagorno Karabagh 49 ANNEX 2 League of Nations Memorandum on the Application for the Admission of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the League of Nations 56 ANNEX 3 League of Nations: Extract from the Journal № 17 of the First Assembly 60 llegalegal aaspects.inddspects.indd 3 229.04.20159.04.2015 116:30:346:30:34 ANNEX 4 League of Nations: Extract from the Records of the First Assembly. The Meetings of the Committees. Fourth Committee 64 ANNEX 5 Declaration of the Revolutionary Committee of the Azerbaijan SSR on Recognition of Nagorno Karabagh, Zanghezour and Nakhichevan as an Integral Part of the Armenian SSR 66 ANNEX 6 An Extract from the Session Protocol of the Presidium of the Council of Ministers of the USSR 67 ANNEX 7 European Parliament Resolution on the Situation in Soviet Armenia 68 ANNEX 8 101st Congress, 2nd Session, Joint Resolution, USA (S. J. RES. 178) 69 ANNEX 9 The Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan on “Abolition of Nagorno Karabagh Autonomous Oblast of the Republic of Azerbaijan” 71 ANNEX 10 An Extract from the USSR Law on “The Procedures of the Resolution of Problems on the Secession of a Union Republic from the USSR 73 ANNEX 11 European Parliament Resolution on “Support for the Peace Process in the Caucasus” 75 ANNEX 12 Report on the Results of the Constitutional Referendum of the Republic of Nagorno Karabagh 77 ANNEX 13 Reports on the Results of Presidential Elections of Nagorno Karabagh Republic 82 ANNEX 14 Reports on the Parliamentary Elections of the Nagorno Karabagh Republic 102 ANNEX 15 Recognition of NKR’s right for self-determination 112 llegalegal aaspects.inddspects.indd 4 229.04.20159.04.2015 116:30:346:30:34 Foreword This is a study of legal issues on Nagorno Karabagh - Artsakh. It does not intend to cover the political and historical aspects: it will instead cover issues of Law as they affected Karabagh in pre-Soviet period, in the period of Sovietization and under Perestroika. It will also examine the issues of sovereignty of Nagorno Karabagh according to the Laws of the former USSR, the compliance of Azerbaijan’s domestic legislation on Nagorno Karabagh and Azerbaijan’s policy of ethnic cleansings with the principles and norms of International Law, as well as the establishment of the Republic of Nagorno Karabagh under International Law. Since a proper understanding of Nagorno Karabagh problem is complicated both by geopolitical changes and by frequent and deliberate misinterpretation and misrepresentation of Karabagh’s history and legal status, we aim at presenting a brief overview of the issue from a legal point of view and demonstrate that Nagorno Karabagh has never been part of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Even a brief study of the legal background of the problem provides a basis to believe that Nagorno Karabagh, apart from its historic and cultural rights, also has full legal foundations for its independence. Foreword 5 llegalegal aaspects.inddspects.indd 5 229.04.20159.04.2015 116:30:346:30:34 Basic Facts Name The Nagorno Karabagh Republic or Republic of Artsakh (Artsakh) Capital Stepanakert Language Armenian Population 146,6 thousand* Ethnic 95% Armenian, 5% minorities (Greeks, Russians, Ukrain- Composition ians, Assyrians, Georgians, Azerbaijanis, etc.) Religion Christian, 95% of the population are adherents of the Armenian Apostolic Church Location Situated in the South-Eastern part of the Armenian highland, from the West it borders with Armenia, from the North and the East - with Azerbaijan, from the South – with Iran. It includes the eastern part of the Karabagh Plateau and extends from the West to the East running into the Lowland Karabagh that forms the major part of the Kura-Arax wide plain. Relief Mountainous Area 12 thousand sq. km, out of which 1041 sq. km are under the Azerbaijani occupation** Main Law Constitution of the Republic of Nagorno Karabagh*** * As of January 1, 2013, NKR National Statistical Service Data. ** According to the Constitution of the Nagorno Karabagh Republic. *** Adopted on December 10, 2006 via nation-wide referendum. 6 Basic Facts llegalegal aaspects.inddspects.indd 6 229.04.20159.04.2015 116:30:346:30:34 Flag Three equal horizontal stripes of red, blue and orange colours (from top to the bottom). From both edges of the right side of the colour cloth a white fi ve-toothed stepped rug pattern starts and joins at the one third of the fl ag. The National Flag was adopted on June 2, 1992, by the Supreme Council of the Republic. National The National Emblem depicts an eagle spreading its Emblem wings upward with sunrays emerging from it. The eagle is crowned with the crown of the Artashesid Dynasty. In the centre is the “We Are Our Mountains” monument against the background of the National Flag and Mount Big Kirs. Beneath, in the claws of the eagle are cluster of grapes, mulberries and ears of wheat. In the upper semicircle of the National Emblem there is an inscription in Armenian “Nagorno Karabagh Republic - Artsakh”. The National Emblem was adopted by the Supreme Council of the Republic on November 17,1992. National The National Anthem is the symbol of independent state- Anthem hood of the Nagorno Karabagh Republic. The National Anthem was adopted by the Supreme Council of the Nagorno Karabagh Republic on November 17, 1992. Administrative Includes 7 regions and the Capital of the Republic division Largest Martuni, Martakert, Askeran, Hadrut, Shushi towns Currency Armenian Dram Time Zone GMT + 04:00 Basic Facts 7 llegalegal aaspects.inddspects.indd 7 229.04.20159.04.2015 116:30:346:30:34 1 Pre-Soviet Status Karabagh (Artsakh) is an integral part of Historic Armenia. It was the 10th province of the Ancient Kingdom of Armenia. In Urartian inscriptions (9th- 7th Centuries B.C.) the name Urtekhini is used for the region. Ancient Greek sources called the area Orkhistene1. After the division of Greater Armenia (387 A.D.), Artsakh became part of the Eastern Armenian Kingdom, which soon fell under the Persian rule. Under the Persian rule Artsakh was a part of the Armenian Province, and in the period of Arabic rule it was part of the Armenian Region. Artsakh was part of the Armenian Kingdom of Bagratids (9th-11th CC.), then – part of Zakarid Armenia (12th-13th CC.). In following Centuries, Artsakh fell under the rule of various conquerors, thus remaining Armenian and possessing a semi-independent status. In the mid 18th Century the invasion of Turkic tribes to the North of Artsakh led to clashes with local Armenians. The Five Armenian Princedoms of Artsakh (Melikdoms of Khamsa) had reached the peak of their power in the late 18th Century. After the Russian-Persian war (1804-1813) Karabagh, along with the other North Eastern provinces of Armenia, was transferred from Persian to Russian dominion under the terms of the Treaty of Gulistan (1813). In 1840, as a result of the implementation of an administrative reform in the Caucasus, which divided the region into two administrative districts, Karabagh was incorporated into the Caspian District. The next administrative reform of 1867 incorporated Karabagh into the Elizavetpol District. The area then remained undisturbed until the beginning of World War I. The dispute over Nagorno Karabagh dates from the period of the Russian Empire’s disintegration after the 1917 October Revolution. Under Lenin’s “National Policy Doctrine”, peoples leaving Russia were recognized in their right for self-determination though no special procedure was settled for the secession from Russia2. During 1918-1920 the legis la tive power in Nagorno Karabagh was exercised by the Assemblies of Armenians of Karabagh. 1. Works of: Strabo - http://www.archive.org/stream/geographyofstrab05strauoft#page/n5/mode/2up, p. 320-323. Pliny the Elder - http://www.archive.org/stream/naturalhistory02plinuoft#page/354/mode/2up, p. 355-357 Claudius Ptolemy - http://www.archive.org/details/PtolemysGeographyBook5, p. 122-123. Plutarch - http://www.archive.org/stream/plutarchslives05plutuoft#page/206/mode/2up, p. 204-207. Dio Cassius - http://www.archive.org/stream/diosromanhistory03cassuoft#page/92/mode/2up, p. 92-95. 2. V. I. Lenin, “Complete Publications of Works”, (Moscow: 1963, in Russian), v. 31, at 436. 8 PRE-SOVIET STATUS llegalegal aaspects.inddspects.indd 8 229.04.20159.04.2015 116:30:346:30:34 The First Assembly of Armenians of Karabagh was convened on July 22, 1918, which declared Nagorno Karabagh as an independent administrative and political entity.
Recommended publications
  • Trekking Trip in Armenia the Mysterious Mountainous Karabakh and the Highest Peak of the Country – Mount Aragats (4095 M)

    Trekking Trip in Armenia the Mysterious Mountainous Karabakh and the Highest Peak of the Country – Mount Aragats (4095 M)

    Trekking trip in Armenia The mysterious Mountainous Karabakh and the highest peak of the country – Mount Aragats (4095 m). TRIP DESCRIPTION This trip is one of a kind. Not only will we conquer Armenia’s highest peak, namely Mount Aragats (4095 m), but also spend several days trekking in the most mysterious and inaccessible part of Armenia: in the Republic of Artsakh. Officially, the Mountainous Karabakh is a part emphasis on the mountains, which are wild of Azerbaijan. The inhabitants of the Moun- and untrampled by mass tourism, and simply tainous Karabakh consider it an independent breathtaking! During our stay in Armenia, we country. But despite the fact that the Moun- will also get to know its culture and tradition, tainous Karabakh has its own government, and visit the most beautiful and famous pla- army, flag and foreign representatives, its in- ces: Lake Sevan, the Temple of Garni, the dependence is not recognized by any country Geghard, Khop Virap and Tatev Monasteries, in the world. You can only enter the territory of and the capital of Armenia: Yerevan. During the Republic of Artsakh from Armenia, and the the whole trip, you will be accompanied by Armenians consider Artsakh (this is how they our team: a English-speaking trip leader and call the Mountainous Karabakh) as an insepa- an Armenian certified high mountain guide rable part of their country. The Republic of Art- (also trained in medical rescue in the moun- sakh is a peculiar place. In spite of the official tains), who will be responsible for your safety. ceasefire, the conflict between two nations is It is also important that we are going to help not settled.
  • The Shifting Geopolitics of the Black Sea Region

    The Shifting Geopolitics of the Black Sea Region

    The Shifting Geopolitics of the Black Sea Region Actors, Drivers and Challenges Geir Flikke (ed.), Einar Wigen, Helge Blakkisrud and Pål Kolstø Norwegian Institute of International Affairs International of Institute Norwegian Institutt Utenrikspolitisk Norsk NUPI Report Publisher: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Copyright: © Norwegian Institute of International Affairs 2011 ISBN: 978-82-7002-303-5 Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. The text may not be printed in part or in full without the permission of the authors. Visiting address: C.J. Hambros plass 2d Address: P.O. Box 8159 Dep. NO-0033 Oslo, Norway Internet: www.nupi.no E-mail: [email protected] Fax: [+ 47] 22 36 21 82 Tel: [+ 47] 22 99 40 00 The Shifting Geopolitics of the Black Sea Region Actors, Drivers and Challenges Geir Flikke (ed.), Einar Wigen, Helge Blakkisrud and Pål Kolstø Introduction2 The Black Sea has long been a focal point for regionalization. Both the EU and NATO have had a proactive policy in the region, and various cooperative arrangements have been made to enhance multilateral mari- time governance in the Black Sea. Numerous regional mechanisms for interaction and cooperation among the littoral states have been set up, such as the Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC), the Black Sea Forum for Dialogue and Partnership (BSF) and the Black Sea Initiative of the EU (BSI). In January 2011, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the Black Sea, reflecting the fact that since 2005 the region itself has entered a new modus operandi.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    75967 Review of World Bank engagement in the Public Disclosure Authorized Irrigation and Drainage Sector in Azerbaijan Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized February 2013 Public Disclosure Authorized © 2012 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000I Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mail [email protected].
  • Glendale Exhibits Explore Concept of Inherited Trauma of Armenian Genocide

    Glendale Exhibits Explore Concept of Inherited Trauma of Armenian Genocide

    MARCH 24, 2018 Mirror-SpeTHE ARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXVIII, NO. 35, Issue 4530 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 INBRIEF Washington Armenian Aliyev Insists on Community Unites in ‘Historic Azeri Lands’ Support of Artsakh In Armenia BAKU (RFE/RL) — Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev has stood by his claims that much of By Aram Arkun modern-day Armenia lies in “historic Azerbaijani Mirror-Spectator Staff lands.” “I have repeatedly said and want to say once again that the territory of contemporary Armenia WASHINGTON — Upon the initiative of is historic Azerbaijani lands. There are numerous the representation of Artsakh in the United books and maps confirming that,” Aliyev said on States, the Armenian Assembly of America Monday, March 19, at the start of official celebra- and the Armenian National Committee of tions of Nowruz, the ancient Persian New Year America (ANCA) organized a reception and marked as a public holiday in Azerbaijan. banquet for the Armenian community on “The Azerbaijani youth must know this first and March 17 at the University Club in foremost. Let it know that most of modern-day Washington D. C. to honor the visiting del- Armenia is historic Azerbaijani lands. We will egation of the Republic of Artsakh led by never forget this,” he said. President Bako Sahakyan. Aliyev has repeatedly made such statements, The bilingual event was moderated by Annie Totah receives a medal from President Bako Sahakyan, while Aram Hamparian holds the medal he just got (photo: Aram Arkun) most recently on February 8. Speaking at a pre- Annie Simonian Totah, board member of election congress of his Yeni Azerbaycan party, he the Armenian Assembly, and Aram pledged to “return Azerbaijanis” to Yerevan, Hamparian, executive director of the two Armenian lobbying organizations of pointed out that the ANCA and the Syunik province and the area around Lake Sevan.
  • Nagorno-Karabakh's

    Nagorno-Karabakh's

    Nagorno-Karabakh’s Gathering War Clouds Europe Report N°244 | 1 June 2017 Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 149 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Ongoing Risks of War ....................................................................................................... 2 A. Military Tactics .......................................................................................................... 4 B. Potential Humanitarian Implications ....................................................................... 6 III. Shifts in Public Moods and Policies ................................................................................. 8 A. Azerbaijan’s Society ................................................................................................... 8 1. Popular pressure on the government ................................................................... 8 2. A tougher stance ................................................................................................... 10 B. Armenia’s Society ....................................................................................................... 12 1. Public mobilisation and anger
  • The Aslian Languages of Malaysia and Thailand: an Assessment

    The Aslian Languages of Malaysia and Thailand: an Assessment

    Language Documentation and Description ISSN 1740-6234 ___________________________________________ This article appears in: Language Documentation and Description, vol 11. Editors: Stuart McGill & Peter K. Austin The Aslian languages of Malaysia and Thailand: an assessment GEOFFREY BENJAMIN Cite this article: Geoffrey Benjamin (2012). The Aslian languages of Malaysia and Thailand: an assessment. In Stuart McGill & Peter K. Austin (eds) Language Documentation and Description, vol 11. London: SOAS. pp. 136-230 Link to this article: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/131 This electronic version first published: July 2014 __________________________________________________ This article is published under a Creative Commons License CC-BY-NC (Attribution-NonCommercial). The licence permits users to use, reproduce, disseminate or display the article provided that the author is attributed as the original creator and that the reuse is restricted to non-commercial purposes i.e. research or educational use. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ______________________________________________________ EL Publishing For more EL Publishing articles and services: Website: http://www.elpublishing.org Terms of use: http://www.elpublishing.org/terms Submissions: http://www.elpublishing.org/submissions The Aslian languages of Malaysia and Thailand: an assessment Geoffrey Benjamin Nanyang Technological University and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore 1. Introduction1 The term ‘Aslian’ refers to a distinctive group of approximately 20 Mon- Khmer languages spoken in Peninsular Malaysia and the isthmian parts of southern Thailand.2 All the Aslian-speakers belong to the tribal or formerly- 1 This paper has undergone several transformations. The earliest version was presented at the Workshop on Endangered Languages and Literatures of Southeast Asia, Royal Institute of Linguistics and Anthropology, Leiden, in December 1996.
  • THE ARMENIAN Mirrorc SPECTATOR Since 1932

    THE ARMENIAN Mirrorc SPECTATOR Since 1932

    THE ARMENIAN MIRRORc SPECTATOR Since 1932 Volume LXXXXI, NO. 42, Issue 4684 MAY 8, 2021 $2.00 Rep. Kazarian Is Artsakh Toun Proposes Housing Solution Passionate about For 2020 Artsakh War Refugees Public Service By Harry Kezelian By Aram Arkun Mirror-Spectator Staff Mirror-Spectator Staff EAST PROVIDENCE, R.I. — BRUSSELS — One of the major results Katherine Kazarian was elected of the Artsakh War of 2020, along with the Majority Whip of the Rhode Island loss of territory in Artsakh, is the dislocation State House in January, but she’s no of tens of thousands of Armenians who have stranger to politics. The 30-year-old lost their homes. Their ability to remain in Rhode Island native was first elected Artsakh is in question and the time remain- to the legislative body 8 years ago ing to solve this problem is limited. Artsakh straight out of college at age 22. Toun is a project which offers a solution. Kazarian is a fighter for her home- The approach was developed by four peo- town of East Providence and her Ar- ple, architects and menian community in Rhode Island urban planners and around the world. And despite Movses Der Kev- the partisan rancor of the last several orkian and Sevag years, she still loves politics. Asryan, project “It’s awesome, it’s a lot of work, manager and co- but I do love the job. And we have ordinator Grego- a great new leadership team at the ry Guerguerian, in urban planning, architecture, renovation Khanumyan estimated that there are State House.” and businessman and construction site management in Arme- around 40,000 displaced people willing to Kazarian was unanimously elect- and philanthropist nia, Belgium and Lebanon.
  • Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (Artsakh)

    Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (Artsakh)

    Armenian National Committee of America 1711 N Street NW | Washington DC 20036 | Tel: (202) 775-1918 | Fax: (202) 775-1918 [email protected] | www.anca.org Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (Artsakh) 1) Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (Artsakh) The Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (Artsakh) is an integral part of historic Armenia that was arbitrarily carved out in 1921 by Joseph Stalin and placed under Soviet Azerbaijani administration, but with autonomous status, as part of the Soviet divide- and-conquer strategy in the Caucasus. Nagorno Karabakh has never been part of an independent Azerbaijani state. Declassified Central Intelligence Agency reports confirm that Nagorno Karabakh is historically Armenian and maintained even more autonomy than the rest of Armenia through the centuries.1 To force Christian Armenians to be ruled by Muslim Azerbaijan would be to sanction Joseph Stalin's policies and ensure continued instability in the region. During seven decades of Soviet Azerbaijani rule, the Armenian population of Nagorno Karabakh was subjected to discriminatory policies aimed at its removal. Even after these efforts to force Armenians from their land, Nagorno Karabakh's pre-war population in 1988 was over 80% Armenian. In the late 1980's, the United States welcomed Nagorno Karabakh's historic challenge to the Soviet system and its leadership in sparking democratic movements in the Baltics and throughout the Soviet empire. Following a peaceful demand by Karabakh's legislative body to reunite the region with Armenia in 1988, Azerbaijan launched an ethnic cleansing campaign against individuals of Armenian descent with pogroms against civilians in several towns, including Sumgait and Baku.
  • A Stability Pact for the Caucasus in Theory and Practice

    A Stability Pact for the Caucasus in Theory and Practice

    CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES WORKING DOCUMENT NO. 152 SEPTEMBER 2000 A STABILITY PACT FOR THE CAUCASUS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE - A SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE MICHAEL EMERSON NATHALIE TOCCI AND ELENA PROKHOROVA CEPS Working Documents are published to give an early indication of the work in progress within CEPS research programmes and to stimulate reactions from other experts in the field. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which they are associated. ISBN 92-9079-309-0 © Copyright 2000, Michael Emerson, Nathalie Tocci and Elena Prokhorova A Stability Pact for the Caucasus in Theory and Practice - A Supplementary Note CEPS Working Document No. 152, November 2000 Michael Emerson, Nathalie Tocci & Elena Prokhorova* Abstract In response to appeals of the leaders of the South Caucasus for a Stability Pact for the region, CEPS published in May 2000 a consultative document with a comprehensive proposal (available on www.ceps.be). Subsequently the authors have held extensive consultations with the leaders in all three states of the South Caucasus, and in four of the key autonomies (Nagorno Karabakh, Abkhazia, Adjaria, Ossetia). The present paper draws together the information and ideas collected during these consultations, although the conclusions are only attributable to the authors. The main argument of the original document is maintained, and strengthened with more precise views on how the conflicts might be solved within the framework of a Stability Pact. However the proposed Stability Pact process could be more than just an approach to conflict resolution. It has systemic or even constitutional aspects, with elements to overcome the transitional problems of the weak state and ease the confrontations of traditional notions such as independence versus territorial integrity, or the choice between federation and confederation, which are part of the present impasse.
  • THE ROAD to INDEPENDENCE 1 | P a G E Des Palm the Road to Independence - Capexit BACKGROUND to DOCUMENT

    THE ROAD to INDEPENDENCE 1 | P a G E Des Palm the Road to Independence - Capexit BACKGROUND to DOCUMENT

    THE ROAD TO INDEPENDENCE 1 | P a g e Des Palm The road to independence - CapeXit BACKGROUND TO DOCUMENT This document is written by ordinary people who share a common concern with the reader, unless the reader is very far removed from reality: the current situation in South Africa (RSA). We do not profess to be, neither are we, scholars of politics, politicians, advocates, barristers or professionals in economics, commerce and other institutions. The problem with most of the previously mentioned captains of industry and politics is a rather simple one - they forgot about the ordinary man in the street. Thus, it is time for the ordinary people of RSA, to stand up and say NO MORE. For long enough we had been spectators and had to watch how we, the minorities in RSA, became more irrelevant to decisions which directly impacts us, whilst our say in all matters of importance to our survival, culture, language, economic survival and human rights are being ignored. As taxpayers we are being milked to a slow death to keep on feeding the black hole of corruption, nepotism, greed and generally hopeless governance. The intention of this document is not to impress with fancy legal jargon or unpronounceable Latin phrases, but rather to emphasise that a claim to our independence is internationally recognized and it your human right !. Why Independence? Generally, a group of people would want to be independent and masters of their own fate when they see increasing threats to their well-being and existence as a group, both physical, emotional and psychological.
  • The Referendum in FW De Klerk's War of Manoeuvre

    The Referendum in FW De Klerk's War of Manoeuvre

    The referendum in F.W. de Klerk’s war of manoeuvre: An historical institutionalist account of the 1992 referendum. Gary Sussman. London School of Economics and Political Science. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government and International History, 2003 UMI Number: U615725 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615725 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 T h e s e s . F 35 SS . Library British Library of Political and Economic Science Abstract: This study presents an original effort to explain referendum use through political science institutionalism and contributes to both the comparative referendum and institutionalist literatures, and to the political history of South Africa. Its source materials are numerous archival collections, newspapers and over 40 personal interviews. This study addresses two questions relating to F.W. de Klerk's use of the referendum mechanism in 1992. The first is why he used the mechanism, highlighting its role in the context of the early stages of his quest for a managed transition.
  • European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership

    European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership

    European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership Result 1 Report on methodology for identification of water abstraction limits depending on ecological flow needs for the rivers of Azerbaijan Baku, 2019 Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document, the “Report on methodology for identification of water abstraction limits depending on ecological flow needs for the rivers of Azerbaijan”, was produced by UNECE at the request of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Azerbaijan and with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area. Executive summary Excessive abstraction of water is one of the key problems of water management in Azerbaijan, which leads among other problems to drying out of many small rivers as a consequence of massive water intake. Ensuring environmental flows in rivers can protect the proper functioning of aquatic ecosystems, thus, contributing to meeting environmental objectives.