DOCSLIB.ORG

Species Interactions I - Competition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Species Interactions I - Competition Announcements Species interactions I - Competition 1 Levels of Study ■ Organismal ■ Population ■ Community ■ Ecosystem ■ Particular species can exist in a particular range of Hey! circumstances Whats the ■ This range is influenced by the presence of other species - big idea!!! e.g. competition ■ Various outcomes of competition are possible and can be documented ■ Particular outcomes depend on nature of species involved, the environment, and the timescale being considered 2 Types of species interactions Effect on A B ◆Competition (AÛB) - - ◆Predation (AÞB) + - ◆Parasitism (AÞB) + - ◆Mutualism (AÛB) + + Essential Questions ■What regulates population size? ■What regulates species number? ■What regulates the distribution of species? 3 Antagonistic interactions ■ Can regulate population sizes ■ Usually increase in severity with N ■ Density dependent ◆Increased N influences b and d ◆Therefore influences ractual ◆Recall logistic growth Competition may be ... ■ Intraspecific ◆Individuals within a species compete for limiting resources ◆This is what weve focussed on 4 Competition may be ... ■ Intraspecific ■ Interspecific ◆Individuals of different species compete for limiting resources Interspecific Competition ■ But first … ◆What is a niche? ■An n-dimension description of resources, habitat, and lifestyle of a species 5 Suppose I find the following … Fig. 53.6 Fundamental vs. Realized Niche See fig. 53.6 6 Fundamental vs. Realized Niche ■ Fundamental niche - niche a species could potentially occupy (in the absence of competition) ■Realized niche - niche a species actually does occupy with competition Interspecific Competition ■ Species that use the same resource(s) can affect each others growth, survival, and reproduction ■Exploitation ◆differential abilities to use or extract the resource 7 Interspecific Competition ■ Species that use the same resource(s) can affect each others growth, survival, and reproduction ■Exploitation ■Interference ◆ one organism directly affects the ability of another organism to obtain resources Competitive exclusion principle ■ Interspecific competition leads to a decrease in each species K (potentially to 0) ■Two species occupying exactly the same niche can not coexist ◆will differ in their competitive ability ◆one will eventually exclude the other 8 Documenting Interspecific competition ■ Need an experiment ◆How would you test this? Documenting Interspecific competition ■ Need an experiment ◆How would you test this? ◆ Is the equilibrium population size (K) reduced in the presence of another species? 9 Documenting Interspecific competition ■ Need an experiment ◆How would you test this? ◆ Is the equilibrium population size (K) reduced in the presence of another species? ◆ Are b and d affected by the presence of another species? Documenting Interspecific competition Example - P. aurelia vs. P. caudatum Fig. 53.3 10 Documenting Interspecific competition Example - Ants vs. rodents vs. Outcomes of Interspecific competition ■ I: Competitive exclusion ◆ Two species with identical niches can not coexist. 53.3,4 11 Outcomes of Interspecific competition ■ I: Competitive exclusion ■II: Coexistence ◆Use of resources (niche) different ◆Realized niches ◆Resource Partitioning Not in text Outcomes of Interspecific competition ■ I: Competitive exclusion ■II: Coexistence ◆ Use of resources (niche) different ✦E.g. Tribolium vs. Oryzaephilis ✦E.g. Anolis Lizards 12 Outcomes of Interspecific competition Not in text Just Flour Flour plus tubes Outcomes of Interspecific competition 13 Outcomes of Interspecific competition Outcomes of Interspecific competition ■ I: Competitive exclusion ■ II: Coexistence ◆ Use of resources (niche) different ◆ Heterogeneity of habitat important (implications for monoculture, forest management) 14 Consider … ■ The San Francisco Bay mudflats where Ilyanassa Photo credit: obsoleta is now found were once occupied by the Anthony Fisher native hornsnail Cerithidea californica. Race (1982) describes how each spring the two populations of these snails collide in the lower marsh channels. By mid-summer Ilyanassa obsoleta has restricted the native hornsail to the upper channels and shallow pools in the upper marsh through a combination of egg predation and direct competitive interference. The high marsh pools (also called salt pannes) are too salty for Ilyanassa obsoleta, and thus provide a habitat refuge for the native snail. http://www.exoticsguide.org/ilyanassa_obsoleta Outcomes of Interspecific competition Niche Differentiation (and Character displacement) 53.7 15 Outcomes of Interspecific competition Niche Differentiation (Character displacement) See Fig. 53.8 Outcomes of Interspecific competition ■ I: Competitive exclusion ■ II: Coexistence ■ III: Niche Differentiation ◆An evolutionary response to competition ◆Ghost of competition past? 16 Summary ■ Competition ◆Intraspecific vs. Interspecific ■ The Niche ◆ Fundamental vs. realized ■Types of competition ◆Exploitation vs. Interference ■Outcomes of competition ◆ I: Competitive exclusion ◆ II: Coexistence ◆ III: Niche Differentiation and Character Displacement Species interactions II - Predation 17 What is predation? ■ A +/- interaction in which one organism feeds on another ◆E.g. animals on each other, animals on plants (herbivory). Exploiters of others ◆Well include parasitism, parasitoidism Why is Predation Important? ■ Can influence population size and distribution of prey ◆Management implications ■ Can influence community organization ◆Species coexistence and stability - Later ■ Is an important force of natural selection 18 Do predators control prey populations? ■Seems obvious, but this is controversial in many cases Do predators control prey populations? ■Seems obvious, but this is controversial in many cases ◆Additive vs. Compensatory Mortality ◆Important management implications - e.g. wolves ◆Do they affect population sizes of caribou, moose? If so, to what degree? 19 Do predators control prey populations? ■Seems obvious, but this is controversial in many cases ■Examples ◆Introduction of predators Do predators control prey populations? ■Seems obvious, but this is controversial in many cases ■Examples ◆Introduction of predators 20 Do predators control prey populations? ■Seems obvious, but this is controversial in many cases ■Examples ◆Introduction of predators Do predators control prey populations? ■Seems obvious, but this is controversial in many cases ■Examples ◆Introduction of predators 21 Do predators control prey populations? ■Seems obvious, but this is controversial in many cases ■Examples ◆Introduction of predators ✦Prickly Pear and Cactus moths in Australia ✦Prickly pear introduced in 1830 ✦Covered 40,000 km2 by 1880 ✦1929: 2 million Cactus moth eggs introduced ✦1935: Prickly pear reduced to 0.2% Do predators control prey populations? ■Seems obvious, but this is controversial in many cases ■Examples ◆Dingos and kangaroos ◆Design an experiment 22 Do predators control prey populations? ■Kangaroos much more abundant in areas where dingos have been excluded Predation in the lab ■Tough to get coexistence in the lab ◆Simple system: Predators tend to eat all the prey - E.g. Paramecium, Didinium 23 Predation in the lab ■Tough to get coexistence in the lab ◆With refugia: Predators drive prey to very low abundance, then die out. Paramecium, Didinium ■Refugia Sound familiar? What have we added? What promotes predator/prey Coexistence? 24 What promotes predator/prey Coexistence? What promotes predator/prey Coexistence? 25 Habitat Heterogeneity What promotes predator/prey Coexistence? ■If predators are controlling prey populations, several factors may allow long term coexistence, including ◆Habitat heterogeneity - Cactus/moth,Mites ◆Refugia - Didinium/Paramecium (potentially) ◆Prey switching - Predators switch to other prey when prey abundance is low. Dingo 26 What, besides predators, could control populations? ■Predator effect could be minor if ◆Predator densities are low. E.g. predators have territories that enforce low density. ◆Predators mainly take prey destined to die without reproducing anyway (old, infirm) ◆Harvesting the doomed. Limited resources for prey mean most will die anyway. E.g. muskrats, mink - Compensatory Mortality What, besides predators, could control populations? ■Mink prey on muskrats ◆A major cause of muskrat death ◆But, does it limit population size? 27 What, besides predators, could control populations? ■Intra- or Interspecific competition may be more important than predation ◆May be a reflection of simple abundance Sea Lions and Salmon 28 Sea Lions and Salmon Why dont plants get wiped out by herbivores? ■Prey may defend themselves! ◆Plants, herbivores, and carnivores 29 Plants are not passive! ■ Physical defense ◆Spines, fibers, stings, etc. ◆Constitutive defenses Plants are not passive! ■ Physical defense ■ Chemical defense - Secondary compounds, E.g. ◆Tannins - reduce digestibility of leaf ◆Nicotine, caffeine, opium, strychnine, digitalis - distasteful or poisonous ■Constitutive or inducible 30 Plants are not passive! ■ Physical defense ■ Chemical defense - Secondary compounds ■Impose a cost to the plant! ◆At low herbivore abundance, selection reduces the level of defense ◆Or, induction may be reduced ◆A reprieve for herbivores Chemical Defense in plants The herbivores respond ■ May develop tolerance to the plant defense and actually specialize on plant ◆Heliconius butterflies and passion flowers ◆Gypsy moths are tannin tolerant 31 Chemical Defense in plants The herbivores respond ■ Some herbivores even store toxic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Neutrality Evolves Through Local Adaptive Niche Evolution
    Regional neutrality evolves through local adaptive niche evolution Mathew A. Leibolda,1, Mark C. Urbanb, Luc De Meesterc, Christopher A. Klausmeierd,e,f, and Joost Vanoverbekec aDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; bDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269; cDepartment of Biology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; dKellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060; eDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060; and fProgram in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology & Behavior, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060 Edited by Nils C. Stenseth, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and approved December 11, 2018 (received for review May 22, 2018) Biodiversity in natural systems can be maintained either because Past theoretical work in this area suggests that, depending on niche differentiation among competitors facilitates stable coexis- assumptions, the effects of local adaptation can either cause com- tence or because equal fitness among neutral species allows for peting species to diverge (17) or converge (18–22) in niche traits, their long-term cooccurrence despite a slow drift toward extinc- facilitating niche partitioning or neutral cooccurrence of species, tion. Whereas the relative importance of these two ecological respectively. This research, however, neglects the regional scale mechanisms has been well-studied in the absence of evolution, the and the process by which communities assemble through re- role of local adaptive evolution in maintaining biological diversity peated colonization, extinction, and competition.Taking this through these processes is less clear. Here we study the contribu- more regional perspective, local adaptive evolution can generate tion of local adaptive evolution to coexistence in a landscape of evolution-mediated priority effects wherein early colonizers adapt to interconnected patches subject to disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Competition Shapes Biological Rhythms and Promotes Temporal Niche
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.22.055160; this version posted April 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 2 3 Resource competition shapes biological rhythms and promotes temporal niche 4 differentiation in a community simulation 5 6 Resource competition, biological rhythms, and temporal niches 7 8 Vance Difan Gao1,2*, Sara Morley-Fletcher1,4, Stefania Maccari1,3,4, Martha Hotz Vitaterna2, Fred W. Turek2 9 10 1UMR 8576 Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Campus Cité Scientifique, CNRS, University of 11 Lille, Lille, France 12 2 Center for Sleep and Circadian Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America 13 3Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy 14 4International Associated Laboratory (LIA) “Perinatal Stress and Neurodegenerative Diseases”: University of Lille, 15 Lille, France; CNRS-UMR 8576, Lille, France; Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, 16 Italy 17 18 19 * Corresponding author 20 E-mail: [email protected] 21 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.22.055160; this version posted April 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Competition: • Lecture Summary: • Definition
    BIOS 6150: Ecology Dr. Stephen Malcolm, Department of Biological Sciences • Week 5: Interspecific Competition: • Lecture summary: • Definition. Semibalanus balanoides • Examples. James P. Rowan, http://www.emature.com • Outcomes. • Lotka-Volterra model. Chthamalus stellatus Alan J. Southward, http://www.marlin.ac.uk/ BIOS 6150: Ecology - Dr. S. Malcolm. Week 5: Interspecific Competition Slide - 1 2. Interspecific Competition: • Like intraspecific competition, competition between species can be defined as: • “Competition is an interaction between individuals, brought about by a shared requirement for a resource in limited supply, and leading to a reduction in the survivorship, growth and/or reproduction of at least some of the competing individuals concerned” BIOS 6150: Ecology - Dr. S. Malcolm. Week 5: Interspecific Competition Slide - 2 3. Interspecific competition between 2 barnacle species (Fig. 8.2 after Connell, 1961): “Click for pictures” BIOS 6150: Ecology - Dr. S. Malcolm. Week 5: Interspecific Competition Slide - 3 4. Gause's Paramecium species compete interspecifically (Fig. 8.3): BIOS 6150: Ecology - Dr. S. Malcolm. Week 5: Interspecific Competition Slide - 4 5. Tilman's diatoms exploitation/scramble (Fig. 8.5): BIOS 6150: Ecology - Dr. S. Malcolm. Week 5: Interspecific Competition Slide - 5 6. A caveat: “The ghost of competition past:” • Lack observed 5 tit species in a single British wood: • 4 weighed 9.3-11.4g and 1 weighed 20.0g. • All have short beaks and hunt for insect food on leaves & twigs + seeds in winter. • Concluded that they coexisted because they exploited slightly different resources in slightly different ways. • But is this a justifiable explanation? Did species change or were species eliminated? • Connell (1980) emphasized that current patterns may be the product of past evolutionary responses to competition - “the ghost of competition past” ! BIOS 6150: Ecology - Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Ecological Succession Predictable?
    Is ecological succession predictable? Commissioned by Prof. dr. P. Opdam; Kennisbasis Thema 1. Project Ecosystem Predictability, Projectnr. 232317. 2 Alterra-Report 1277 Is ecological succession predictable? Theory and applications Koen Kramer Bert Brinkman Loek Kuiters Piet Verdonschot Alterra-Report 1277 Alterra, Wageningen, 2005 ABSTRACT Koen Kramer, Bert Brinkman, Loek Kuiters, Piet Verdonschot, 2005. Is ecological succession predictable? Theory and applications. Wageningen, Alterra, Alterra-Report 1277. 80 blz.; 6 figs.; 0 tables.; 197 refs. A literature study is presented on the predictability of ecological succession. Both equilibrium and nonequilibrium theories are discussed in relation to competition between, and co-existence of species. The consequences for conservation management are outlined and a research agenda is proposed focusing on a nonequilibrium view of ecosystem functioning. Applications are presented for freshwater-; marine-; dune- and forest ecosystems. Keywords: conservation management; competition; species co-existence; disturbance; ecological succession; equilibrium; nonequilibrium ISSN 1566-7197 This report can be ordered by paying € 15,- to bank account number 36 70 54 612 by name of Alterra Wageningen, IBAN number NL 83 RABO 036 70 54 612, Swift number RABO2u nl. Please refer to Alterra-Report 1277. This amount is including tax (where applicable) and handling costs. © 2005 Alterra P.O. Box 47; 6700 AA Wageningen; The Netherlands Phone: + 31 317 474700; fax: +31 317 419000; e-mail: [email protected] No part of this publication may be reproduced or published in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system without the written permission of Alterra. Alterra assumes no liability for any losses resulting from the use of the research results or recommendations in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition, Predation and Nest Niche Shifts Among Tropical Cavity Nesters: Ecological Evidence
    JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY 36: 74Á/83, 2005 Competition, predation and nest niche shifts among tropical cavity nesters: ecological evidence Donald J. Brightsmith Brightsmith, D. J. 2005. Competition, predation and nest niche shifts among tropical cavity nesters: ecological evidence. Á/ J. Avian Biol. 36: 74Á/83. I studied cavity-nesting birds in an undisturbed site in lowland Peru to determine the relative roles of competition and predation in favoring termitarium nesting over tree cavity nesting. Occupancy rates of both nest boxes and natural tree cavities near 2% suggest that competition for tree cavities is not favoring the use of termitaria. Artificial nests and bird nests in termitaria suffer significantly lower predation rates than similar nests in old tree cavities showing that predation is favoring the use of termitaria over old tree cavities. Bird nests in newly excavated tree cavities also show lower predation rates than older cavities suggesting that cavity age is more important than substrate (tree or termitaria) per se. This study suggests that nest predation has a greater influence than nest competition on life history evolution for many cavity-nesting birds. D. J. Brightsmith, Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham NC 27708-0338, E-mail: [email protected] Nest site selection greatly influences avian natural transitions from nesting in tree cavities to nesting in history. Traits like clutch size, nestling period, renesting arboreal termite mounds. These transitions correlated probability, nest initiation date and nest predation rates with an increase in nestling period suggesting that all correlate with nesting niche (Lack 1968, Martin 1995, predation rates in termite mounds are significantly lower Robinson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Title: Population Ecology
    Colorado Teacher-Authored Instructional Unit Sample Science High School - Biology Unit Title: Population Ecology INSTRUCTIONAL UNIT AUTHORS Monte Vista School District Kana Condon Schuyler Fishman Loree Harvey Eric Hotz BASED ON A CURRICULUM OVERVIEW SAMPLE AUTHORED BY Boulder Valley School District Tammy Hearty Jefferson County School District Chalee McDougal Poudre School District Laura Grissom Colorado’s District Sample Curriculum Project This unit was authored by a team of Colorado educators. The template provided one example of unit design that enabled teacher- authors to organize possible learning experiences, resources, differentiation, and assessments. The unit is intended to support teachers, schools, and districts as they make their own local decisions around the best instructional plans and practices for all students. DATE POSTED: MARCH 31, 2014 Colorado Teacher-Authored Sample Instructional Unit Content Area Science Grade Level High School Course Name/Course Code Biology Standard Grade Level Expectations (GLE) GLE Code 1. Physical Science 1. Newton’s laws of motion and gravitation describe the relationships among forces acting on and between SC09-GR.HS-S.1-GLE.1 objects, their masses, and changes in their motion – but have limitations 2. Matter has definite structure that determines characteristic physical and chemical properties SC09-GR.HS-S.1-GLE.2 3. Matter can change form through chemical or nuclear reactions abiding by the laws of conservation of mass and SC09-GR.HS-S.1-GLE.3 energy 4. Atoms bond in different ways to form molecules and compounds that have definite properties SC09-GR.HS-S.1-GLE.4 5. Energy exists in many forms such as mechanical, chemical, electrical, radiant, thermal, and nuclear, that can be SC09-GR.HS-S.1-GLE.5 quantified and experimentally determined 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Habitat Complexity: Niche Differentiation in an African
    Brittany Huntington San Francisco State University, California Biodiversity and Habitat Complexity: Niche Differentiation in an African Lake Overview Importance Findings Lake Tanganyika is an ideal system to test Increasing impacts from overfishing and My results suggest that habitat complexity plays the theory that complex habitats support deforestation make it crucial that we an important role in structuring species diversity. greater biodiversity. This lake has: understand the factors supporting the These trends warrant further research into niche • A highly diverse ecosystem extraordinary biodiversity of this lake so that differentiation in this system. • Numerous endemic species, including littoral snails we can better protect this ecosystem. Productivity • Distribution and diversity patterns that are poorly Species Richness vs. Algal Biomass Gastropod diversity vs. Algal Biomass Species Richness vs. GPP 1.8 12 10 e 2 2 R = 0.4042 R2 = 0.6524 understood R = 0.3315 9 10 1.4 Scientific Approach P = 0.0491 8 8 1 7 6 6 0.6 Species Richness Species 5 Species Richness 4 Ind H Diversity Shannon 0.2 4 Hypothesis 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 Sites with high benthic primary productivity (snail food supply) Benthic Algal Biomass (ug/cm2) Benthic Algal Biomass (ug/cm2) GPP (mg C / m2-h) and high habitat complexity (high niche complementarity) Fig 1Fig 2Fig 3 support greater diversity of snails. Fig 1 & 2 Increased primary productivity is correlated to decreased Observed snail distributions on rocky substrate species richness and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Hominid Paleoecology and Competitive Exclusion
    YEARBOOK OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 24:101-121(1981) Hominid Paleoecology and Competitive Exclusion: Limits to Similarity, Niche Differentiation, and the Effects of Cultural Behavior BRUCE WINTERHALDER Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 KEY WORDS Paleoanthropology, Hominid paleoecology, Competitive exclusion principle, Single species hypothesis, Compression hypothesis ABSTRACT Fossil evidence from the Plio-Pleistocene of Africa apparently has confirmed a multi-lineage interpretation of early hominid evolution. Empir- ical refutation of the single species hypothesis must now be matched to the ev- olutionary ecology theory, which can underwrite taxonomic assessment and help to explain sympatric hominid coexistence. This paper contributes to that goal by reassessing the ecological rationale provided for the single-species hypothesis. Limiting similarity concepts indicate that the allowable ecological overlap be- tween sympatric competitors is greater than the degrees of metric overlap often advanced as standards for identifying fossil species. Optimal foraging theory and the compression hypothesis show that the initial ecological reaction of a hominid to a sympatric competitor would likely be micro-habitat divergence and possibly also temporal differentiation of resource use. The long-term, evolutionary re- sponse is niche divergence, probably involving diet as well. General niche par- titioning studies suggest that diet and habitat are the most common dimensions of niche separation, although temporal separation is unusually frequent in car- nivores. The equation of niche with culture, basic to the single-species hypothesis, has no analytic meaning. Finally, four minor points are discussed, suggesting that (a) extinction is not unlikely, even for a long-lived and competitively com- petent hominid lineage, (b) parsimony is fickle, (c) interspecific mutualism may jeopardize survival, and (d) generalists are subordinate competitors, but for hom- inids, seemingly, successful ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned by Scan2net
    BERICHTE aus dem INSTITUT FÜR MEERESKUNDE an der CHRISTIAN-ALBRECHTS-UNIVERSITÄT ·KIEL NR. 293 Factcrs causing the zonation of three Fucus species (Phaeophyta) in the intertidal zone of Helgeland (German Bight, North Sea) Testing the validity of Keddy's 'competitive hierarchy model' "'.".~~~ / ........r,:"' ~ < ; -. ~-""} '"-''' '""""- "-"''' by Ralf Karez Kiel 1997 Kopien dieser Arbeit können bezogen werden durch: Institut für Meereskunde an der Universität Kiel -Bibliothek- Düsternbrooker Weg 20 D-241 05 Kiel Germany ISSN 0341-8561 Diese Arbeit wurde von der Mathematisch­ Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Kiel 1996 als Dissertation angenommen. CONTENTS Glossary ................................................................................................................................ 1 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 3 Zusammenfassung .............................................................................................................. 5 1 General Introduction .................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Description of the study site ................................................................................ 2 2 2 Competition................................................................................................................... 27 2.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Competition and Niche Differentiation in Barley (Hordeum Vulgare) and Wheat (Triticum Aestivum) Mixtures Under Rainfed Conditions in the Central Highlands Oferitrea
    Netherlands Journal ofAgricultural Science 49 (2001) 95-112 Competition and niche differentiation in barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) mixtures under rainfed conditions in the Central Highlands ofEritrea A. WOLDEAMLAKI,2, L. BASTIAANS2 AND P.C. STRUIK2 * I University ofAsmara, College ofAgriculture and Aquatic Sciences, Department ofPlant Science, P. O. Box 1220, Asmara, Eritrea 2 Wageningen University, Department ofPlant Sciences, Crop and Weed Ecology Group, Haarweg 333, NL-6709 RZ Wageningen, The Netherlands • Corresponding author (fax: +31-317-485572; e-mail: [email protected]) Received 23 February 2001; accepted 30 June 2001 Abstract Barley and wheat mixtures were grown in the field using additive and replacement ratios at two locations (Halhale and Mendefera) in Eritrea during the 1997 and 1998 seasons. The aim was to assess yield advantage and to analyse competition and niche differentiation using a hyperbolic regression model. It proved advantageous to grow barley and wheat in mixtures because more land area was required to obtain the same yield in sole crops. The hyperbolic regression approach confirmed that barley and wheat grown in mixtures resulted in yield ad• vantages as a result of complementary use of resources. Barley showed greater competitive ability than wheat; for wheat, interspecific competition was larger than the intraspecific competition while for barley the intraspecific competition was greater than the interspecific competition. Niche differentiation indices were always above 1.0 indicating that the compo• nent crops did not inhibit each other from sharing resources in a complementary way. Key words: Competition, niche differentiation, yield advantage, mixed cropping, barley, wheat Introduction The cropping system hanfetz is practised in the highlands of Eritrea.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Trait Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics Explain Niche Diversity and Evolved Neutrality in Forests
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/014605; this version posted January 30, 2015. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Multi-trait eco-evolutionary dynamics explain niche diversity and evolved neutrality in forests Daniel Falster Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University NSW 2109, Australia [email protected] Åke Brännström Evolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schloss- platz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria; Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden [email protected] Mark Westoby Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University NSW 2109, Australia [email protected] Ulf Dieckmann Evolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schloss- platz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria [email protected] 1 ABSTRACT An enduring challenge in ecology is to understand how diverse plant species coexist when com- peting for the same basic resources1–4. Two candidate frameworks for meeting this challenge currently exist in forest ecology. Niche-based approaches succeed in describing successional dy- namics in response to recurrent disturbances5–9. Approaches based on Hubbell’s neutral theory describe abundance patterns in highly diverse communities10. Yet both theories are unsuccess- ful where their competitor is strong, highlighting an enduring need for reconciliation11–13. In fact, the perception that niche and neutral processes are incompatible may have arisen because both types of models have lacked some critical features of real forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Ecology of Forest, Heath, and Shrub Savannah Alternate States in Eastern Canada
    Article Functional Ecology of Forest, Heath, and Shrub Savannah Alternate States in Eastern Canada Colin St. James and Azim U. Mallik * Department of Biology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-(807)-343-8927; Fax: +1-(807)-364-7796 Abstract: In eastern Canada, alternation of wildfire regime due to fire suppression creates alternate vegetation states converting black spruce forest to heath and shrub savannah (SS). We compared the taxonomic diversity (TD) and functional diversity (FD) of post-fire forest, heath, and SS alternate states to determine if community FD can explain their persistence. We hypothesized that (i) species diversity (TD and FD) would be the highest in forest followed by SS and heath due to decreased interspecific competition and niche differentiation, (ii) differences between TD and FD indices would be greater in communities with high TD in forest due to high trait differentiation and richness, and (iii) changes in community trait values would indicate niche limitations and resource availability. We conducted this study in Terra Nova National Park, Newfoundland, Canada. We calculated functional dispersion (alpha FD), functional pairwise dissimilarity (beta FD), Shannon’s diversity (alpha TD), and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity (beta TD) from species cover. We used five functional traits (specific root length, specific leaf area, leaf dry matter content, height, and seed mass) related to nutrient acquisition, productivity, and growth. We found lower beta diversity in forest than heath and SS; forest also had higher species diversity and greater breadth in niche space utilization. SS was functionally similar to heath but lower than forest in functional dispersion and functional divergence.
    [Show full text]