DOCSLIB.ORG

Haberstroh on Matyszak, 'The Rise of the Hellenistic Kingdoms, 336-250 BC'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Haberstroh on Matyszak, 'The Rise of the Hellenistic Kingdoms, 336-250 BC' H-War Haberstroh on Matyszak, 'The Rise of the Hellenistic Kingdoms, 336-250 BC' Review published on Thursday, May 13, 2021 Philip Matyszak. The Rise of the Hellenistic Kingdoms, 336-250 BC. Yorkshire: Pen & Sword Military, 2019. Illustrations. 176 pp. $34.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-4738-7476-3. Reviewed by John Haberstroh (University of California Riverside) Published on H-War (May, 2021) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air University) Printable Version: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=56072 Philip Matyszak has produced a brief and lively narrative of the early Hellenistic period. Although the title implies a scope from the ascension of Alexander III (“the Great”) of Macedon until the middle of the third century BC, the content of this book necessarily spills over into the earlier reign of Philip II of Macedon as background. The stated argument of the book is that “the Hellenistic kingdoms were massively successful” because “the Greek rulers of Egypt, Anatolia, Persia, and points east did not try to change the peoples they ruled.” By extension, Matyszak actively works against the notion that the Hellenistic Greek rulers had any semblance of a “denativization” policy and “made little effort to convert the peoples they ruled to their own way of life” (p. 1). On the whole, this argument is generally successful, though in practice the book actually achieves more. The book could be divided into two sections, with chapters 1 through 5 narrating the conquests of Alexander and the Wars of the Diadochi (“successors”) and chapters 6 through 9 taking up more geographically focused treatments of the successor kingdoms. This review will first lay out a chapter-by-chapter analysis followed by thematic comments on the execution of this easygoing introduction to the early Hellenistic period. A brief introduction airs (some of) the intellectual baggage that often comes with the Hellenistic period in scholarship: colonialism, racism, and narratives of decline. Matyszak is careful to distinguish his work from these problematic earlier accounts of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, though he does not completely escape certain questionable colloquial phrases (see below). Ultimately, the Hellenistic kingdoms were “humanistic and inclusive” (p. xiii). Chapter 1, “Before Alexander,” introduces the kingdoms of Macedon, Persia, and Egypt as a prelude to the invasion of the Persian Empire by Alexander. Chapter 2, “Alexander Conquers the World (Part I),” frames the invasion as an “all-or-nothing gamble” by Alexander, who was a typical paranoid Macedonian monarch using a superior army as a personal vendetta against Darius III of Persia. Chapter 3, “Alexander Conquers the World (Part II),” picks up after the battle of Gaugamela and describes the abortive foray into India and the full revelation of Alexander’s agenda of fusing aspects of non-Greek cultures into his administration. Chapter 4, “The Wars of the Diadochi (‘Successors’),” begins with a “who’s who” of the major players in the Diadochi Wars: Perdiccas, Antipater, Antigonus Monophthalmus, Ptolemy, Eumenes, and Seleucus. The rest of the chapter narrates the bloody conflicts between these men as a case study in “realpolitik, shifting alliances, back-stabbing and betrayal on a truly epic scale” (p. 54). Chapter 5, “Wars of the Successors – Part II,” recounts the final phases of the successor wars from the Battle of Ipsus in 301 BC to the death of Seleucus in 281 Citation: H-Net Reviews. Haberstroh on Matyszak, 'The Rise of the Hellenistic Kingdoms, 336-250 BC'. H-War. 05-13-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/7712590/haberstroh-matyszak-rise-hellenistic-kingdoms-336-250-bc Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-War BC. Chapter 6, “Hellenism: The Next Generation,” eases readers out of the chaos of the successor wars and into the consolidation of distinct though still consistently fluctuating geographic empires in Macedon, Egypt, and the Seleucid Empire, ending with the Cremonidian War (267-261 BC). Chapter 7, “The West,” begins the formal treatments of each major Hellenistic kingdom starting with Antigonus Gonatas in Macedon but also gives brief treatments of southern Greece, Pergamon, Bithynia, and Syracuse. Chapter 8, “The Seleucid Empire,” covers the broad geographic span of the Seleucid Empire, noting mostly how the easternmost portions quickly broke off and formed independent kingdoms or were absorbed by opportunistic Indian monarchs, the development of the Mesopotamian and Syrian heartlands, and the effective yet strategically hamstrung Seleucid army. Chapter 9, “Ptolemaic Egypt,” dives into economic and cultural successes of the Ptolemaic state, with nearly half the chapter devoted to the Great Library of Alexandria and the Lighthouse at Pharos. A brief epilogue providing cursory treatments on Hellenistic philosophies (Cynicism, Stoicism, and Epicureanism), warfare, art, and literature concludes the book. Tackling this complex period and geographic content is a brave undertaking, and for packaging it in such a comprehensible way, Matyszak should be commended. There are many memorable phrases that demonstrate the groundedness of Matyszak’s writing style, such as his description of how a Persian scythe chariot worked (“rather in the manner that a hand blender hits a fruit salad”) and how the Aetolian and Achaean Leagues quarreled in Greece (“it should come as no surprise that the pair fought like cats in a sack”), as well as tongue-in-cheek quips like that concerning the unoriginal naming conventions of the Ptolemys (“Ptolemy had decided earlier that his eldest son Ptolemy was unsuitable for the throne, and had therefore repudiated him in favour of his son Ptolemy”) (pp. 35, 111, 82-83). The professed “great fun” of the subject matter and Matyszak’s spirited prose are what make reading the book so engrossing—one could easily go cover to cover in a day or over a leisurely weekend (p. xii). Like for many of the other military and political narratives published by Pen & Sword, the audience for this book is largely interested lay readers with no scholarly training. The absence of footnotes or endnotes, general lack of direct references to ancient documents, and the avoidance of the nitty- gritty of scholarly debates on chronology seem to be aimed at the interested lay reader. It would be somewhat useful for undergraduates, but the slim background on ancient sources and important topics like imperialism and cultural exchange might deter college instructors.[1] The very short select bibliography is naturally focused on anglophone scholarship, and it pays homage to major and well- known works in the field, like Peter Green’sAlexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age (1990), Arnaldo Momigliano’s Alien Wisdom: The Limits of Hellenization (1975), and S. Sherwin-White and A. Kuhrt’s From Samarkhand to Sardis: A New Approach to the Seleucid Empire (1993), but only five of the twenty-six bibliographic entries are within eight years of the publication under review.[2] There are four poor-quality maps in the front matter, but the seventeen plates in the middle of the book are much better, though the reader is never directed to them in the text. The index is adequate; however, most of the entries are names of individuals or places with a few thematic entries (fans of military affairs will not find “phalanx,” “war elephants,” or “sarissa” in the index). A disappointing area of the book is its treatment of women and casual colonialist references. The Citation: H-Net Reviews. Haberstroh on Matyszak, 'The Rise of the Hellenistic Kingdoms, 336-250 BC'. H-War. 05-13-2021. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/7712590/haberstroh-matyszak-rise-hellenistic-kingdoms-336-250-bc Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-War focus on political and military narrative already circumscribes the roles of many women, save for the few royal women who forced their way into the recorded historical narratives by their own will and volition. Matyszak unfortunately chooses to fall back on misogynistic attitudes that essentially reduce important women like Olympias, the mother of Alexander, and the many royal women named Berenice, Arsinoe, and Eurydice to mere stock characters. Olympias has “a highly unstable character” and has an “irrational and sadistic impulsiveness” (pp. 46, 49, 55). Eurydice, who sought an advantageous marriage with Alexander’s brother Philip Arrhidaeus, was a “formidable” and “strong-willed lass” (p. 58). Hellenistic royal women are often described as “scheming” or “backstabbing,” or otherwise depicted in a negative light (pp. 88, 92, 94, 105). Many today would also disagree with Matyszak’s statement that “it does feminism an injustice to maintain that women can be just as hard and ruthless as males” (p. 62). While these portrayals are often what has been handed down through the historical record, a more sympathetic and up-to-date appraisal is warranted.[3] Similarly, the unironic use of phrases like “barbarians,” “barbarian hordes,” “wild tribes,” and the like ought to be abandoned by publishers. Matyszak argues that the Macedonians were always in a state of high alert, fearing another invasion by the Persian “Menace,” an Orientalist phrasing, but this claim seems to be overstated. There is also a somewhat covert colonial mindset that underpins the book, which relates to the overall thesis. For Matyszak, the success that characterized the early Hellenistic kingdoms was due to the process of city foundation and settling colonists abroad effectively to create “islands of Greek culture” (pp. 17-18). Matyszak attributes the success of this model to earlier Archaic and classical era colonial foundations by southern Greeks across the Mediterranean, but it should be clarified that such foundations did not always result in some harmonious settlement between Greeks and “natives.” Likewise, in the early Hellenistic period there was surely conflict between new arrivals and local populations, despite the general indifference that Matyszak imputes on the Hellenistic rulers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VU Research Portal
    VU Research Portal The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon Pirngruber, R. 2012 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Pirngruber, R. (2012). The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon: in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 - 140 B.C. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. R. Pirngruber VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip of Macedon Kindle
    PHILIP OF MACEDON PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Nicholas Hammond | 270 pages | 01 Apr 2013 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9780715628294 | English | London, United Kingdom Philip of Macedon PDF Book Philip stood up, drew his sward, and charged at Alexander, only to trip and fall on his face in his drunken stupor at which Alexander shouted:. Becoming convinced that Rome intended to destroy him, he extended his authority into the Balkans in three campaigns , , Why were the Macedonians styled as "Greeks" in the 19th Century? To achieve this, he needed to control the sea, and he therefore had to take action against Athens, which had a navy and had supported Egypt on more than one occasion. The Road to Hegemony. Macedonian Symbols. Twitter Facebook Pinterest Google Classroom. He was the 18th king of Macedonia and ruled from to B. He organized all Greek states into a Greek league. Five years after his return to Macedon, Philip became regent for King Amyntas IV but he was able to secure the crown for himself within a few months. Yet, the seeds of change had been sown. Yet then and now, questions arose as to whether there was more to the story—whether Pausanias acted alone or whether someone used this traumatized young man as a pawn in some larger game. Philip already had plans for invasion of the Persian Empire, which would crown his career as world conqueror. He refused to wear the insignia of rank and in the early years of his command, Philip led from the front. Commander of the Greeks, Illyrians, and Thracians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Achaemenid Persia on Fourth-Century and Early Hellenistic Greek Tyranny
    THE INFLUENCE OF ACHAEMENID PERSIA ON FOURTH-CENTURY AND EARLY HELLENISTIC GREEK TYRANNY Miles Lester-Pearson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11826 This item is protected by original copyright The influence of Achaemenid Persia on fourth-century and early Hellenistic Greek tyranny Miles Lester-Pearson This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews Submitted February 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Miles Lester-Pearson, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 88,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2010 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2011; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2010 and 2015. Date: Signature of Candidate: 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Mortem Et Gloriam Army Lists Use the Army Lists to Create Your Own Customised Armies Using the Mortem Et Gloriam Army Builder
    Army Lists Syria and Asia Minor Contents Asiatic Greek 670 to 129 BCE Lycian 525 to 300 BCE Bithynian 434 to 74 BCE Armenian 330 BCE to 627 CE Asiatic Successor 323 to 280 BCE Cappadocian 300 BCE to 17 CE Attalid Pergamene 282 to 129 BCE Galatian 280 to 62 BCE Early Seleucid 279 to 167 BCE Seleucid 166 to 129 BCE Commagene 163 BCE to 72 CE Late Seleucid 128 to 56 BCE Pontic 110 to 47 BCE Palmyran 258 CE to 273 CE Version 2020.02: 1st January 2020 © Simon Hall Creating an army with the Mortem et Gloriam Army Lists Use the army lists to create your own customised armies using the Mortem et Gloriam Army Builder. There are few general rules to follow: 1. An army must have at least 2 generals and can have no more than 4. 2. You must take at least the minimum of any troops noted and may not go beyond the maximum of any. 3. No army may have more than two generals who are Talented or better. 4. Unless specified otherwise, all elements in a UG must be classified identically. Unless specified otherwise, if an optional characteristic is taken, it must be taken by all the elements in the UG for which that optional characteristic is available. 5. Any UGs can be downgraded by one quality grade and/or by one shooting skill representing less strong, tired or understrength troops. If any bases are downgraded all in the UG must be downgraded. So Average-Experienced skirmishers can always be downgraded to Poor-Unskilled.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Coin Specialist
    .' Numismatic Art of Antiquity VO/4. No, 8 AUGUST 1990 $2,00 Timeless tradition Origin of piggy bank traced to life style of Romans by Marvin Tameanko vernacular we might say - ownership of Of all the Roman inventions which a pig was like having "money in the are still in use today. the most mundane banJc" , but numismatic ally interesting is the Roman savings banks were very common "piggy" bank. The earliest common and examples are lrnown from known example of a piggy bank was as early as Republican times. These found in 1908 during the excavations of banks were usually made of a ceramic Pompeii. the Roman city buried by the material in the form of urns, temples volcano of Vesuvius in A.D. 79. This and dome shaped beehives. Urns were savings bank. was found hidden in the used by Romans for storing valuables garden wall of a large house. It was and for receptacles for donative offerings made of terracotta in the form of an to the gods. The temples. being sacred elaborately ornamented, decorative chest buildings. served as the banks in ancient It was obviously meant to be a times and Romans deposited large sums miniature imitation of the strong boxes of money to temple ueasuries for usually located in the atrium of the safekeeping. Honey was the commonly Roman home which contained the used sweetener in ancient times and the family's funds and valuables. Incised on bee was known as an industrious saver The "Piggy Bank" found at Porrpeii in 1908, the lid of the bank was a drawing of a of honey.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult
    ΑΡΣΙΝΟΗ ΕΥΠΛΟΙΑ Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult Carlos Francis Robinson Bachelor of Arts (Hons. 1) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 Historical and Philosophical Inquiry Abstract Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult By the early Hellenistic period a trend was emerging in which royal women were deified as Aphrodite. In a unique innovation, Queen Arsinoë II of Egypt (c. 316 – 270 BC) was deified as the maritime Aphrodite, and was associated with the cult titles Euploia, Akraia, and Galenaië. It was the important study of Robert (1966) which identified that the poets Posidippus and Callimachus were honouring Arsinoë II as the maritime Aphrodite. This thesis examines how this new third-century BC cult of ‘Arsinoë Aphrodite’ adopted aspects of Greek cults of the maritime Aphrodite, creating a new derivative cult. The main historical sources for this cult are the epigrams of Posidippus and Callimachus, including a relatively new epigram (Posidippus AB 39) published in 2001. This thesis demonstrates that the new cult of Arsinoë Aphrodite utilised existing traditions, such as: Aphrodite’s role as patron of fleets, the practice of dedications to Aphrodite by admirals, the use of invocations before sailing, and the practice of marine dedications such as shells. In this way the Ptolemies incorporated existing religious traditions into a new form of ruler cult. This study is the first attempt to trace the direct relationship between Ptolemaic ruler cult and existing traditions of the maritime Aphrodite, and deepens our understanding of the strategies of ruler cult adopted in the early Hellenistic period.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Note : Geographical landmarks are listed under the proper name itself: for “Cape Sepias” or “Mt. Athos” see “Sepias” or “Athos.” When a people and a toponym share the same base, see under the toponym: for “Thessalians” see “Thessaly.” Romans are listed according to the nomen, i.e. C. Julius Caesar. With places or people mentioned once only, discretion has been used. Abdera 278 Aeaces II 110, 147 Abydus 222, 231 A egae 272–273 Acanthus 85, 207–208, 246 Aegina 101, 152, 157–158, 187–189, Acarnania 15, 189, 202, 204, 206, 251, 191, 200 347, 391, 393 Aegium 377, 389 Achaia 43, 54, 64 ; Peloponnesian Aegospotami 7, 220, 224, 228 Achaia, Achaian League 9–10, 12–13, Aemilius Paullus, L. 399, 404 54–56, 63, 70, 90, 250, 265, 283, 371, Aeolis 16–17, 55, 63, 145, 233 375–380, 388–390, 393, 397–399, 404, Aeschines 281, 285, 288 410 ; Phthiotic Achaia 16, 54, 279, Aeschylus 156, 163, 179 286 Aetoli Erxadieis 98–101 Achaian War 410 Aetolia, Aetolian League 12, 15, 70, Achaius 382–383, 385, 401 204, 250, 325, 329, 342, 347–348, Acilius Glabrio, M. 402 376, 378–380, 387, 390–391, 393, Acragas 119, COPYRIGHTED165, 259–261, 263, 266, 39MATERIAL6–397, 401–404 352–354, 358–359 Agariste 113, 117 Acrocorinth 377, 388–389 Agathocles (Lysimachus ’ son) 343, 345 ; Acrotatus 352, 355 (King of Sicily) 352–355, 358–359; Actium 410, 425 (King of Bactria) 413–414 Ada 297 Agelaus 391, 410 A History of Greece: 1300 to 30 BC, First Edition. Victor Parker.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Career and Different Achievements of Asoka
    International Journal of Research in Social Sciences Vol. 7 Issue 9, September 2017, ISSN: 2249-2496 Impact Factor: 7.081 Journal Homepage: http://www.ijmra.us, Email: [email protected] Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabell’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A Early career and different achievements of Asoka Manoj Malakar* Abstract Asoka was the greatest emperor in Mauriyan dynesty. He was a great patronage of Buddhism and art and architecture. This paper tries to high light about the early life and career of the great Mauryan emperor Asoka. There was lot of great emperor in Indian history, who wrote their name in golden letter in history and Asoka also one of among these rulers. Some different prominent writer had analysis about Asoka’s life and career. This paper tries to analyses how he (Asoka) began his career and got achievements during his region. This paper also tries to highlight Asoka’s Dhamma and his patronage of art and architecture during his region. This paper also tries to discuss Asoka’s patronage of Buddhism. He sent his own son and girl to Sri Lanka to spread Buddhism. Keywords: Career, Buddha Dhamma, Art and Architecture, Inscription. * Assistant Teacher & Faculty K.K.H.S.O.U. (Malaybari junior college study centre). 624 International Journal of Research in Social Sciences http://www.ijmra.us, Email: [email protected] ISSN: 2249-2496 Impact Factor: 7.081 Introduction Asoka was one of the greatest kings of India.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antigonids and the Ruler Cult. Global and Local Perspectives?
    The Antigonids and the Ruler Cult Global and Local Perspectives? 1 Franca Landucci DOI – 10.7358/erga-2016-002-land AbsTRACT – Demetrius Poliorketes is considered by modern scholars the true founder of ruler cult. In particular the Athenians attributed him several divine honors between 307 and 290 BC. The ancient authors in general consider these honors in a negative perspec- tive, while offering words of appreciation about an ideal sovereignty intended as a glorious form of servitude and embodied in Antigonus Gonatas, Demetrius Poliorketes’ son and heir. An analysis of the epigraphic evidences referring to this king leads to the conclusion that Antigonus Gonatas did not officially encourage the worship towards himself. KEYWORDS – Antigonids, Antigonus Gonatas, Demetrius Poliorketes, Hellenism, ruler cult. Antigonidi, Antigono Gonata, culto del sovrano, Demetrio Poliorcete, ellenismo. Modern scholars consider Demetrius Poliorketes the true founder of ruler cult due to the impressively vast literary tradition on the divine honours bestowed upon this historical figure, especially by Athens, between the late fourth and the early third century BC 2. As evidenced also in modern bib- liography, these honours seem to climax in the celebration of Poliorketes as deus praesens in the well-known ithyphallus dedicated to him by the Athenians around 290 3. Documentation is however pervaded by a tone that is strongly hostile to the granting of such honours. Furthermore, despite the fact that it has been handed down to us through Roman Imperial writers like Diodorus, Plutarch and Athenaeus, the tradition reflects a tendency contemporary to the age of the Diadochi, since these same authors refer, often explicitly, to a 1 All dates are BC, unless otherwise stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]