DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Waterfront Revitalization Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Village of Macedon Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Adopted: Village of Macedon Board of Trustees, March 9, 2016 Approved: NYS Secretary of State Rossana Rosado, March 23, 2017 Village of Macedon Resolution Adopting the Village of Macedon Local Waterfront Revitalization Program WHEREAS, the Village of Macedon initiated preparation of a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program in cooperation with the New York State Department of State, pursuant to Article 42 of the Executive Law; and WHEREAS, a Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program was prepared and circulated by the Department of State to potentially affected State, federal, and Local agencies in accordance with the requirements of Executive Law, Article 42; and WHEREAS, the Village of Macedon, as lead agency, filed a Negative Declaration‐Notice of Determination of Non‐Significance on March 9, 2016 for preparation of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (State Environmental Quality Review Act; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Macedon Local Waterfront Revitalization Program is hereby adopted, and that the Mayor is authorized to submit the LWRP to the New York State Secretary of State for approval, pursuant to the Waterfront Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act. Motion: The following above motion was made on March 9, 2016 by Deputy Mayor Kelly and Trustee Nelson: Motion carries: 4 votes in favor 1 absent ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Marie Cramer, Mayor Dave Kelly, Deputy Mayor Kathy Reilly, Village Clerk Village of Macedon Planning Board: Project Steering Committee: Mark Howell, Chair Marie Cramer, Mayor Geoff Greapentrog Marcy Frey, Chair Laurie Leenhouts Linda Braun Gil Magee Laurie Leenhouts Gregory Reed Gil Magee Village Trustees: Dave Nelson Dave Kelly Kathy Reilly Don Lohse Dave Sliney Dave Nelson Past Members: Beverly Bassage Donna Stebbins This Local Waterfront Revitalization Program was prepared with funding provided by the New York State Department of State under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. Table of Contents OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 1 NYS LWRP PROGRAM ..................................................................................................................... 1 WATERFRONT PLANNING IN THE VILLAGE OF MACEDON .......................................................................... 2 REGIONAL CONTEXT (MAP 1) ............................................................................................................. 3 ORGANIZATION OF THE LWRP ............................................................................................................ 4 SECTION I: WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION AREA BOUNDARY ................................................ 1 WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION AREA BOUNDARY JUSTIFICATION ............................................................... 1 WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION AREA BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION (MAP 2) .................................................... 1 SECTION II: INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS.................................................................................. 1 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 1 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................................................ 2 Population Characteristics..................................................................................................................................... 2 Home Ownership................................................................................................................................................... 3 Housing Costs and Value ....................................................................................................................................... 3 ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................................................. 4 Household Income ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Employment .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 EXISTING LAND AND WATER USES ....................................................................................................... 5 Current Land Use Patterns .................................................................................................................................... 5 Current Water Use (Map 3) ................................................................................................................................... 8 Navigation ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 LAND USE REGULATIONS .................................................................................................................. 10 Site Plan Review .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Subdivision Regulations ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Village Zoning Code (Map 4) ............................................................................................................................... 11 OWNERSHIP ............................................................................................................................. 15 Land Ownership (Map 5) ..................................................................................................................................... 15 Underwater Ownership ....................................................................................................................................... 17 ABANDONED, DETERIORATED AND UNDERUTILIZED SITES (MAP 6) .......................................................... 18 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL RESOURCES (MAP 7) .................................................................................... 21 Historic Resources ............................................................................................................................................... 21 Archeological Resources...................................................................................................................................... 24 PARKS, RECREATIONAL AND OPEN SPACE RESOURCES (MAP 8) ............................................................... 24 Parks and Recreational Facilities ......................................................................................................................... 24 Open Space and Trails ......................................................................................................................................... 27 Boating Facilities.................................................................................................................................................. 28 Potential Recreational and Trail Opportunities ................................................................................................... 28 VISUAL QUALITY AND SCENIC RESOURCES (MAP 9) ............................................................................... 28 NATURAL RESOURCES (MAP 10) ....................................................................................................... 30 Fish and Wildlife Habitats .................................................................................................................................... 31 Waterbodies ........................................................................................................................................................ 33 Water Quality ...................................................................................................................................................... 33 Flood Hazard Areas ............................................................................................................................................. 34 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................................. 34 Topography ......................................................................................................................................................... 34 Soil Characteristics .............................................................................................................................................. 34 INFRASTRUCTURE (MAPS 11&12)..................................................................................................... 35 Roadways and Traffic Volume ............................................................................................................................. 35 Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure ................................................................................................................. 36 Rail Service .......................................................................................................................................................... 36 Public Transportation .........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Heart of Ontario Regional Tourism Strategy
    Hamilton Halton Brant Regional Tourism Association (RTO 3) Regional Tourism Strategy Update 2015-2018 November 2014 1 Millier Dickinson Blais: RTO 3 Regional Tourism Strategy Review Final Report Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 4 2 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 HHBRTA ORGANIZATION 7 2.1.1 DESTINATION VISITOR EXPERIENCE BRANDING 8 2.1.2 PREVIOUS WORK 9 3 SECTOR ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................ 20 3.1 TOURISM – A GLOBAL DRIVER 20 3.1.1 GLOBAL TOURISM TRENDS TO WATCH 21 3.2 THE CANADIAN TOURISM CONTEXT 23 3.2.1 CANADIAN TOURISM MARKETS 24 3.2.2 ABORIGINAL TOURISM IN CANADA 25 3.3 TOURISM IN THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO 26 3.3.1 PROVINCIAL VISITOR TRENDS 27 3.3.2 ONTARIO TOURISM CHALLENGES 28 3.3.3 ARTS AND CULTURE 28 3.4 RTO 3 REGION VISITOR TRENDS 29 3.4.1 TOURISM METRICS BY CENSUS DIVISION 33 3.4.2 NEIGHBOURING RTO COMPARATIVE STATISTICS 36 3.4.3 VISITOR FAMILIARITY AND INTEREST IN ONTARIO’S RTO’S 39 3.5 ACCOMMODATIONS SECTOR REVIEW 41 4 CONSULTATIONS ................................................................................................................ 47 4.1 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS 47 4.1.1 BRANT 47 4.1.2 HALTON 48 4.1.3 HAMILTON 49 4.1.4 SIX NATIONS 50 4.1.5 ACCOMMODATION SECTOR ONLINE SURVEY 51 4.1.6 DESTINATIONS MARKETING ORGANIZATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Souvenir Purchase As an Important Medium for Sustainable Development in Rural Tourism: the Case Study in Dahu, Mioli County, Taiwan
    2009 National Extension Tourism (NET) Conference The use of souvenir purchase as an important medium for sustainable development in rural tourism: The case study in Dahu, Mioli county, Taiwan Tzuhui A. Tseng, Ph. D. Assistant Professor, Department of Regional Studies in Humanity and Social Sciences, National Hsinchu University of Education, Taiwan David Y. Chang, Ph. D. Associate Professor, School of Hotel & Restaurant Management, University of South Florida Ching-Cheng Shen, Ph. D. Associate Professor, The Graduate School of Travel Management, National Kaohsiung Hospitality College Outline • Introduction • Literature review • RhdiResearch design • Result • Conclusion and suggestion Graburn (1977) stated that very few visitors would not bring back anything to showoff their trip after coming back from a vacation. Int r oduction Introduction • Souvenir becomes destination or attraction – Tourists not only come visit for its special local scenery or cultural activity, but sometimes for its spppecial local product as well. – It is a very common custom for Taiwanese tourists to purchase local souvenirs as gifts to bring back to friends and family. • Souvenir bring big economy – Turner and Reisinger (2000) indicated that tourists spent 2/3 of their total cost on shopp in g when t ra ve ling dom esti call y, an d 1/5 o f t he tota l cost w en t in to sh oppin g when traveling internationally. – Shopping is a main or secondary factor for traveling, and is very important to tourists. it often is an important factor for whether a trip is successful. • Niche tourism or Special interest tourism – There are not many related studies on souvenir purchasing in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • ALDRICH TOWING-PATH CHANGE BRIDGE Erie Canal, Bridge No. 35
    ALDRICH TOWING-PATH CHANGE BRIDGE HAER No. NY-315 Erie Canal, Bridge No. 35 Sexton Bridge Spanning the New York State Heritage Trail, Aqueduct Park (Moved from Macedon, Wayne County, NY) My. Palmyra Wayne County New York > PHOTOGRAPHS (^.REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service 1849 C Street, NC300 Washington, DC 20240 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD ALDR1CH TOWING-PATH CHANGE BRIDGE (Erie Canal, Bridge No. 35) (Sexton Bridge) HAERNo.NY-315 Location: Spanning the New York State Heritage Trail, Aqueduct Park, Palmyra, Wayne County, New York. Date of Construction: 1858 Builders: John Hutchinson (Troy, New York), contractor and builder. George W. Eddy, Mohawk and Hudson Iron Works (Waterford, New York), founder and machinist. Present Owner: Town of Macedon, New York, 30 Main Street, Macedon, Wayne County, New York (Nelson Warner, Supervisor, 1998). Present Use: Monument and footbridge Significance: The Aldrich Change Bridge is the oldest dated iron bridge in New York State and one of only two bridges known to survive from the first enlargement of the Erie Canal. In addition to its importance as an artifact of one of the nation's earliest and most significant public works, it draws attention to one of the lesser known and largely overlooked designs of Squire Whipple, nineteenth-century America's foremost theoretician-practitioner of truss bridge design. Fabricated in the Waterford, New York, iron works of George W. Eddy and erected by John Hutchinson of Troy, the Aldrich change bridge was a product of the rich industrial complex then flourishing at the confluence of the Mohawk and Hudson Rivers in eastern New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Seneca
    TOWN OF BRISTOL Inventory of Land Use and Land Cover Prepared for: Ontario County Water Resources Council 20 Ontario Street, 3rd Floor Canandaigua, New York 14424 and Town of Bristol 6740 County Road 32 Canandaigua, New York 14424 Prepared by: Dr. Bruce Gilman Department of Environmental Conservation and Horticulture Finger Lakes Community College 3325 Marvin Sands Drive Canandaigua, New York 14424-8395 2020 Cover image: Ground level view of a perched swamp white oak forest community (S1S2) surrounding a shrub swamp that was discovered and documented on Johnson Hill north of Dugway Road. This forest community type is rare statewide and extremely rare locally, and harbors a unique assemblage of uncommon plant species. (Image by the Bruce Gilman). Acknowledgments: For over a decade, the Ontario County Planning Department has supported a working partnership between local towns and the Department of Environmental Conservation and Horticulture at Finger Lakes Community College that involves field research, ground truthing and digital mapping of natural land cover and cultural land use patterns. Previous studies have been completed for the Canandaigua Lake watershed, the southern Honeoye Valley, the Honeoye Lake watershed, the complete Towns of Canandaigua, Gorham, Richmond and Victor, and the woodlots, wetlands and riparian corridors in the Towns of Seneca, Phelps and Geneva. This report summarizes the latest land use/land cover study conducted in the Town of Bristol. The final report would not have been completed without the vital assistance of Terry Saxby of the Ontario County Planning Department. He is gratefully thanked for his assistance with landowner information, his patience as the fieldwork was slowly completed, and his noteworthy help transcribing the field maps to geographic information system (GIS) shape files.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism and Place in Treasure Beach, Jamaica: Imagining Paradise and the Alternative. Michael J
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1999 Tourism and Place in Treasure Beach, Jamaica: Imagining Paradise and the Alternative. Michael J. Hawkins Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Hawkins, Michael J., "Tourism and Place in Treasure Beach, Jamaica: Imagining Paradise and the Alternative." (1999). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 7044. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/7044 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bteedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Characteristics and Development Countermeasure of Tourist Market in Heilongjiang Province Under the Background Of
    2019 5th International Conference on Economics and Management (ICEM 2019) ISBN: 978-1-60595-634-3 Study on Characteristics and Development Countermeasure of Tourist Market in Heilongjiang Province under the Background of "Internet +" Xiao-Yang LI1,a and Jing YANG1,b 1School of Tourism and Cuisine, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China [email protected],[email protected] Keywords: "Internet +", Tourism Market, Characteristic, Development Countermeasures, Heilongjiang Province. Abstract. Across the industry convergence of “the Internet + travel” has become an important path to promote the development of tourism. In the process of tourism development, tourist market in Heilongjiang province has formed a distinct characteristics, strengths and weaknesses are clear. Must foster strengths and circumvent weaknesses, give full play to the support and drawing function of the Internet, increase the government's support, in market supervision, marketing, product development, etc, to take positive and effective countermeasures. Introduction At present, people’s dependence on the Internet and mobile terminals is more and more big, consumer behavior has a fundamental change, the Internet consumption becomes one of the main methods of mass consumption. The tourism market is same. 2017 Chinese online travel market deals size is of about 828.6 billion yuan, year-on-year growth is 35%[1]. Practice has proved that the Internet is fully used in tourism, and the industry integration of “Internet + travel”, for the development of tourism and economic development, is of great significance. After unremitting efforts of more than 30 years, the tourism industry in Heilongjiang province achieved rapid progress. In 2017, the total revenue of tourism industry is 190.9 billion yuan, increased by 19.1%[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Complexes and Their Role in Industrial Tourism – Example of Conversion
    DOI: 10.1515/gse-2016-0008 45 INDUSTRIAL COMPLEXES AND THEIR ROLE IN INDUSTRIAL TOURISM – EXAMPLE OF CONVERSION Martin Klempa, Petr Bujok, Michal Porzer, Petr Skupien Institute of Geological Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 15, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract Sustainable tourism development meets the needs of present tourists and host regions while protecting and increasing its possibilities for the future. It should lead to management of all resources, so as to meet economic, social and aesthetic needs while maintaining cultural integrity, the most important ecological processes, biological diversity and the processes that make life possible. Sustainable tourism products are products that work in accordance with the local environment, society and culture so that the environment, society and culture can benefit and not to become the victims of tourism development. At present, luckily, it is possible to observe, in a wide range of tourist activities and especially in industrialized countries, also increasing interest in so-called industrial tourism aimed at exploring technical monuments. This form of tourism was initially the domain of narrow range of technically-based supporters, but gradually becomes more attractive to the broader public. This article deals with the development and transformation of tourism in the Czech Republic on an example of the Podluzi region and one of its centres – the town of Hodonin. From the tourist activities in the region those specifically attractive ones should be mentioned, which are wine and folklore tourism in close connection with gastronomical tourism and then increasingly popular cycling and water tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Tourism Development in Cities: Towards a Framework
    Chapter 1 Industrial Tourism Development in Cities: Towards a Framework 1 Introduction Industrial tourism is a type of tourism which involves visits to operational companies and industrial heritage; it offers visitors an experience with regard to products, production processes, applications, and historical backgrounds. More than 100 years ago public and private organisations already started to organise industrial tourism visits. Historic examples include visits to French wineries and chocolate factories, to Greek and Maltese lace-producers and to Dutch cheese producers. In Paris, tourists and residents had the opportunity to choose among various tours back in 1900. The tours on offer ranged from visits of textile-factories to tours of mortuaries and slaughterhouses. Furthermore, also a visit to a tobacco factory, the stock exchange, the parliament and the court of justice were possible. There is also evidence from the United States that industrial tourism has actually a long history; a good example is the Jack Daniel’s distillery in Tennessee which began to offer factory tours back in 1866, the year when the company started operating (Frew, 2000). Industrial tourism offers opportunities for individual firms, but also for cities. Particularly for cities with a considerable industrial base, industrial tourism comprises interesting possibilities to strengthen the economic structure (direct and indirect employment) and to increase the supply of tourist products. For such cities industrial tourism is a potential growth sector that matches with their identity: the sector offers opportunities to strengthen their distinctiveness and image, notably by building on their existing assets. Many cities, however, have the assets to develop industrial tourism but fail to capitalise on them.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee – Finger Lakes Regional Blueway Analysis an Inventory and Description of Regional Blueway Opportunity Areas
    GGeenneesseeee –– FFiinnggeerr LLaakkeess RReeggiioonnaall BBlluueewwaayy AAnnaallyyssiiss An Inventory and Description of Blueway Opportunity Areas in the Genesee – Finger Lakes Region Prepared for the Town of Wheatland, New York and the New York State Department of State Division of Coastal Resources with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. June 2010 Front Cover: Oak Orchard Creek from Rt. 63 in Iroquois National Wildlife Refuge. 9/14/09 Genesee – Finger Lakes Regional Blueway Analysis An Inventory and Description of Regional Blueway Opportunity Areas June 2010 This document was prepared for the Town of Wheatland, New York and the New York State Department of State Division of Coastal Resources with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. Contract No. C006794 This project is classified as a “Type II Action Requiring No Further Review” under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act. See §617.5(C)18. Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 50 West Main Street • Suite 8107 Rochester, NY 14614 (585) 454-0190 http://www.gflrpc.org [email protected] Mission Statement The Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council (G/FLRPC) will identify, define, and inform its member counties of issues and opportunities critical to the physical, economic, and social health of the region. G/FLRPC provides forums for discussion, debate, and consensus building, and develops and implements a focused action plan with clearly defined outcomes, which include programs, personnel, and funding. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Project Coordinator / Report Layout, Design and Editing Brian C. Slack, AICP – Senior Planner Contributors Thomas Kicior, Planner Razy Kased, Planner All photos were taken by Brian Slack unless otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Document / WASHU-W-99
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1999 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COASTAL AND MARINE TOURISM Balancing Tourism and Conservation APRIL 26-29, 1999 VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA EDITED BY MARC L. MILLER JAN AUYONG NINA P. HADLEY WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF KIM ENGIE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1999 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COASTAL AND MARINE TOURISM Balancing Tourism and Conservation APRIL 26-29, 1999 VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA EDITED BY MARC L. MILLER SCHOOL OF MARINE AFFAIRS UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON JAN AUYONG OREGON SEA GRANT COLLEGE PROGRAM OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY AND NINA P. HADLEY TIDAL DELTA CONSULTING WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF KIM ENGIE Oregon Washington Published by the Washington Sea Grant Program and School of Marine Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (USA); Oregon Sea Grant College Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR (USA); and Oceans Blue Foundation, Vancouver, British Columbia (CANADA) WSG-WO 03-01/WASHU-W-99-003/ORESU-W-99-003 ii Publication Date: 2002 Citation Miller, Marc L., Auyong, Jan, and Hadley, Nina P. (eds.). (2002). Proceedings of the 1999 International Symposium on Coastal and Marine Tourism: Balancing Tourism and Conservation. (26- 29 April, 1999, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Washington Sea Grant Program and School of Marine Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Oregon Sea Grant College Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, and Oceans Blue Foundation, Vancouver, BC. Editors’ Note These Proceedings contain original material by many authors. No material is to be reprinted without prior permission from the author. The papers in these proceedings have been edited for consistency in format and length; minor changes have been made in language, syntax and punctuation.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967
    Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 4~St. Lawrence River Basin Index of Surface-Water Recore's to September 30, 1 967 Part 4-St. Lawrence River Basin By B. A. Anderson and C. B. Ham G E 0 L 0 G I C A L S U R V E Y C I R C U L A R 574 w.t· ..... JNI United States Department of the Interior STEWART l. UDAll, s.a.lary Geological Survey William T. Pecora~ DiNdor "- M .,. ' l"aa ,. ._ U.S. GIDios"caf s.n.,, 'At1:wltie...,., D.C. J0242 Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 4-St. Lawrence River Basin By B. A. Anderson and C. B. Ham INTRODUCTION This report lists the streamflow and reservoir stations in the St. Lawrence River basin for which records have been or are to be published in repons of the Geological Survey for periods through September 30, 1967. It supersedes Geological Survey Circular 504. Basic data on surface-water supply have been published in an annual series of water-supply papers consisting of several volumes, including one each for the States of Alaska and Hawaii. The area of the other 48 States is divided into 14 parts whose boundaries coincide with cenain natural drainage lines. Prior to 1951, the records for t'le 48 States were published in 14 volumes, one for each of the parts. From 1951 to 1960, the records for the 48 States were published annually in 18 volumes, there being 2 volumes each for Parts 1, 2, 3, and 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Hosts and Guests Revisited: Tourism Issues of the 21St Century
    Hosts and Guests Revisited: Tourism Issues of the 21st Century Co-Edited by Valene L. Smith and Maryann Brent Department of Anthropology California State University Chico, CA 95929-0400,USA IUPUI UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 755 W. MICHIGAN STREET INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46202-5195 Hosts and Guests Revisited: Tourism Issues of the 21st Century Copyright © Cognizant Communication Corporation 2001 No pact of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without permission in writing from the publisher. The publisher and the publisher's agents represent that the data provided were formulated with a reasonable standard of care. Except for this representation, the publisher makes no representation or warranties, ex­ pressed or implied. Cognizant Communication Offices: U.S.A. 3 Hartsdale Road, Elmsford, New York 10523-3 701 Australia P.O. Box 352 Cammer<1y, NWS, 2062 . Japan c/o OBS T's Bldg. 3F, 1-38-11 Matsubara, Setagaya-ku,Tokyo library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hosts and guests revisited: tourism issues of the 21st century / coedited by Valene L. Smith and Maryann Brent. p. cm. (Tourism dynamics) Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN Hl82345-28-2 (Hard bound). - ISBN I-882345-29-0 (pbk.) I. Tourism. 2. Tourism - Social aspects. I. Smith, Valene L. II. Brent, Maryann, 1944- ll. Series. Gl55.Al H67 2001 338.4'791-dc21 § 2001042292 Printed in the United States ofAmerica Printing: I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO Year: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts.
    [Show full text]