DOCSLIB.ORG

This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy fungal ecology 4 (2011) 134e146 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funeco Addressing uncertainty: How to conserve and manage rare or little-known fungi Randy MOLINAa,*, Thomas R. HORTONb, James M. TRAPPEa, Bruce G. MARCOTc aOregon State University, Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, 321 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA bState University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, 246 Illick Hall, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA cUSDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 620 SW Main Street, Suite 400, Portland, OR 97205, USA article info abstract Article history: One of the greater challenges in conserving fungi comes from our incomplete knowledge of Received 8 March 2010 degree of rarity, risk status, and habitat requirements of most fungal species. We discuss Accepted 15 June 2010 approaches to immediately begin closing knowledge gaps, including: (1) harnessing Available online 15 September 2010 collective expert knowledge so that data from professional experiences (e.g., personal Corresponding editor: Anne Pringle collection and herbarium records) are better organized and made available to the broader mycological community; (2) thinking outside the mycology box by learning and borrowing Keywords: from conservation approaches to other taxonomic groups; (3) developing and testing Adaptive management hypothesis-driven habitat models for representative fungi to provide support for habitat Expert knowledge restoration and management; (4) framing ecological questions and conducting field Fungus conservation surveys and research more directly pertinent to conservation information needs; and (5) Habitat modeling providing adaptive management guidelines and strategies for resource managers to Species vs. systems approaches conserve fungi based on incrementally improving knowledge from experience and conservation research. ª 2010 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved. Introduction and ecology remain disparate and difficult or impossible to obtain for systematic rarity and risk analysis. Collection data The workshop on conservation of fungi at the 2009 Mycolog- often lack essential information for species or fungal ical Society of America meetings in Snowbird, Utah posed this communities, e.g., detailed macro- and microhabitat question: Have we enough information to make sound requirements or population metrics. Such knowledge and conservation judgments and management recommendations data gaps produce great uncertainty in identifying species at for fungi at risk or fungi in general? The answer was an risk and appropriate conservation measures. Nevertheless, equivocal yes and no. Yes, knowledge of taxonomy, biology, rather than discouraging mycologists, this raises an exciting and ecology of fungi is considerable and growing rapidly with challenge. use of molecular tools. Yet, we remain daunted by the number Conservation of fungi raises several key questions. Do we of fungus species about which we know little or nothing, not include all fungal species in a conservation agenda or only to mention those still undiscovered. Much of the data, rare species? If we focus on rare species, how do we determine particularly on species occurrences and geographic ranges, which are truly rare? Fungi are difficult to detect due to their * Corresponding author. 620 SE 14th Court, Gresham, OR 97080, USA. E-mail address: [email protected] (R. Molina). 1754-5048/$ e see front matter ª 2010 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2010.06.003 Author's personal copy How to conserve and manage rare or little-known fungi 135 often cryptic natures and ephemeral production of fruiting regarding species identifications e some ecological diver- structures. Of the ca. 1.5 million estimated species, only about sity studies determine only unique DNA sequences, simply 5 % are formally described (Hawksworth 1997, 2001). Although referred to as “taxonomic units,” and we are left with poor mycologists have determined through Red-list analyses that description of the actual species involved. several hundreds are indeed rare (Dahlberg et al. 2009), most (2) Distributional uncertainty e We lack systematic inventories fall into what Molina & Marcot (2007) called the “little-known of fungal species presence, abundance, and distribution e conundrum” e some may indeed be rare, others common, but all key determinants of species rarity, population trends, we do not know about rarity for most and likely will never and extirpation risk. Inventories or systematic surveys are know. Further, we know that fungi play key functional roles in difficult for several reasons, including lack of experts to nutrient dynamics (Talbot et al. 2008), soil health (Claridge identify specimens (related to 1 above), training of field et al. 2009a), species mutualisms and interactions (Nishida crews in fungal collection, multiple years of surveys to 2007; Mack & Rudgers 2008), and overall ecosystem document presence or absence, and overall expense. Most processes (Dighton et al. 2005), but without knowledge of surveys focus on macrofungus sporocarps, but numerous distribution and ecology of fungal species and communities in molecular studies indicate that sporocarp surveys typi- specific environments, developing effective conservation cally underestimate diversity and do not accurately reflect guidelines will be difficult. species abundance or dominance in soils or roots (Horton How then do we conserve such an extremely diverse group & Bruns 2001). Successful examples of large-scale fungal for which so much knowledge is lacking and difficult to surveys or inventories (Ehlers et al. 2003; Molina 2008) and obtain? Clearly we cannot protect all fungi on a species-by- availability of inventory tools (Mueller et al. 2004) indicate species basis. Yet, much of fungal conservation via the IUCN is that we can progress significantly here if we design the species-based. To be inclusive for conserving fungi in general studies according to appropriate statistical sampling and (i.e., all the rare or little-known species), we need to test established collection protocols. broader system-level approaches (Raphael & Molina 2007). (3) Ecological uncertainty e Molecular tools have provided We do not review here all the issues regarding conserva- a wealth of new information on fungal diversity, commu- tion of fungi. Instead, we highlight some key areas where nity dynamics, host specificity, and species interactions. mycologists can have immediate and positive impact on Yet, we lack critical information on environmental asso- producing more data and designing studies that address ciations and habitat requirements for most fungi at micro- critical knowledge gaps and uncertainty. We focus on three and macrohabitat scales. We poorly understand responses common themes. First, recognize that we will never have the of most fungal species to natural and anthropogenic complete knowledge that is needed to address the issues disturbance at small and large spatial and temporal scales surrounding fungus conservation especially at the species- (e.g., Penttila et al. 2006; Peay et al. 2007; Trappe et al. specific level. Second, mycologists need to think outside the 2009b,c). Ecological information is needed to develop mycology box, consider conservation efforts of other disci- effective management guidelines that maintain or restore plines, and seek opportunities to test approaches and princi- habitat for fungal species. Species conservation programs ples developed for other taxa or systems. Third, mycologists typically take into account population trends, yet we lack can help craft fungus conservation guidelines in an adaptive critical population metrics and methods for fungi, such as framework that tests their efficacy and incrementally adds defining individuals and their longevity, dispersal modes knowledge. We draw on examples from the literature and and capabilities, and genetic structure. Further, mycolo- practical experience with conservation efforts in the Pacific gists need to understand how fungi have adapted to past Northwestern USA, particularly for ectomycorrhizal (EM) changes in the environment at various spatial and fungi. temporal scales so that we can predict response to ecosystem changes, including climate change (e.g., Chung et al. 2006). Sources of uncertainty Given these many uncertainties, how can mycologists Prioritizing information needs first entails understanding the better foster conservation guidelines and craft research basic sources of uncertainty for conserving rare or little- approaches to improve our ability to conserve fungi
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi: Exploring the Linkages Between Functional and Taxonomic Responses to Anthropogenic N Deposition
    fungal ecology 4 (2011) 174e183 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funeco Conservation of ectomycorrhizal fungi: exploring the linkages between functional and taxonomic responses to anthropogenic N deposition E.A. LILLESKOVa,*, E.A. HOBBIEb, T.R. HORTONc aUSDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Houghton, MI 49931, USA bComplex Systems Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03833, USA cState University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, 246 Illick Hall, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA article info abstract Article history: Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition alters ectomycorrhizal fungal communities, but the Received 12 April 2010 effect on functional diversity is not clear. In this review we explore whether fungi that Revision received 9 August 2010 respond differently to N deposition also differ in functional traits, including organic N use, Accepted 22 September 2010 hydrophobicity and exploration type (extent and pattern of extraradical hyphae). Corti- Available online 14 January 2011 narius, Tricholoma, Piloderma, and Suillus had the strongest evidence of consistent negative Corresponding editor: Anne Pringle effects of N deposition. Cortinarius, Tricholoma and Piloderma display consistent protein use and produce medium-distance fringe exploration types with hydrophobic mycorrhizas and Keywords: rhizomorphs. Genera that produce long-distance exploration types (mostly Boletales) and Conservation biology contact short-distance exploration types (e.g., Russulaceae, Thelephoraceae, some athe- Ectomycorrhizal fungi lioid genera) vary in sensitivity to N deposition. Members of Bankeraceae have declined in Exploration types Europe but their enzymatic activity and belowground occurrence are largely unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Phylogeny of Suillus (Suillaceae; Boletales; Basidiomycota) from Coniferous Forests of Pakistan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE & BIOLOGY ISSN Print: 1560–8530; ISSN Online: 1814–9596 13–870/2014/16–3–489–497 http://www.fspublishers.org Full Length Article Diversity and Phylogeny of Suillus (Suillaceae; Boletales; Basidiomycota) from Coniferous Forests of Pakistan Samina Sarwar * and Abdul Nasir Khalid Department of Botany, University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore, 54950, Pakistan *For correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Suillus (Boletales; Basidiomycota) is an ectomycorrhizal genus, generally associated with Pinaceae. Coniferous forests of Pakistan are rich in mycodiversity and Suillus species are found as early appearing fungi in the vicinity of conifers. This study reports the diversity of Suillus collected during a period of three (3) years (2008-2011). From 32 basidiomata of Suillus collected, 12 species of this genus were identified. These basidiomata were characterized morphologically, and phylogenetically by amplifying and sequencing the ITS region of rDNA. © 2014 Friends Science Publishers Keywords: Moist temperate forests; PCR; rDNA; Ectomycorrhizae Introduction adequate temperature make the environment suitable for the growth of mushrooms in these forests. Suillus (Suillaceae, Basidiomycota, Boletales ) forms This paper described the diversity of Suillus (Boletes, ectomycorrhizal associations mostly with members of the Fungi) with the help of the anatomical, morphological and Pinaceae and is characterized by having slimy caps, genetic analyses as little knowledge is available from forests glandular dots on the stipe, large pore openings that are in Pakistan. often arranged radially and a partial veil that leaves a ring or tissue hanging from the cap margin (Kuo, 2004). This genus Materials and Methods is mostly distributed in northern temperate locations, although some species have been reported in the southern Sporocarp Collection hemisphere as well (Kirk et al ., 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Woodland Restoration Phase Three: Maximising Ecological Integrity
    Practical Guidance Module 5 Ancient woodland restoration Phase three: maximising ecological integrity Contents 1 Introduction ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������3 2 How to maximise ecological integrity ��������������������������������������4 2�1 More ‘old-growth characteristics’ ������������������������������������4 2�1�1 More old trees ���������������������������������������������������������5 • Let natural processes create old trees • Use management interventions to maintain and develop more old trees 2�1�2 More decaying wood����������������������������������������������8 • Let natural processes create decaying wood • Use management interventions to maintain and create more decaying wood • Veteranisation techniques can create wood- decay habitats on living trees 2�1�3 Old-growth groves �����������������������������������������������15 • Use minimum intervention wisely to help develop old-growth characteristics 2�2 Better space and dynamism �������������������������������������������17 2�2�1 Let natural processes create space and dynamism ��������������������������������������������������17 2�2�2 Manage animals as an essential natural process ������������������������������������������������������ 22 • Consider restoration as more than just managing the trees 2�2�3 Use appropriate silvicultural interventions ��� 28 • Use near-to-nature forestry to create better space and dynamism 2�3 Better physical health ����������������������������������������������������� 33 2�3�1 Better water ��������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Fungi of North East Victoria Online
    Agarics Agarics Agarics Agarics Fungi of North East Victoria An Identication and Conservation Guide North East Victoria encompasses an area of almost 20,000 km2, bounded by the Murray River to the north and east, the Great Dividing Range to the south and Fungi the Warby Ranges to the west. From box ironbark woodlands and heathy dry forests, open plains and wetlands, alpine herb elds, montane grasslands and of North East Victoria tall ash forests, to your local park or backyard, fungi are found throughout the region. Every fungus species contributes to the functioning, health and An Identification and Conservation Guide resilience of these ecosystems. Identifying Fungi This guide represents 96 species from hundreds, possibly thousands that grow in the diverse habitats of North East Victoria. It includes some of the more conspicuous and distinctive species that can be recognised in the eld, using features visible to the Agaricus xanthodermus* Armillaria luteobubalina* Coprinellus disseminatus Cortinarius austroalbidus Cortinarius sublargus Galerina patagonica gp* Hypholoma fasciculare Lepista nuda* Mycena albidofusca Mycena nargan* Protostropharia semiglobata Russula clelandii gp. yellow stainer Australian honey fungus fairy bonnet Australian white webcap funeral bell sulphur tuft blewit* white-crowned mycena Nargan’s bonnet dung roundhead naked eye or with a x10 magnier. LAMELLAE M LAMELLAE M ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S, P ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE M ■ ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S ■ LAMELLAE S ■ When identifying a fungus, try and nd specimens of the same species at dierent growth stages, so you can observe the developmental changes that can occur. Also note the variation in colour and shape that can result from exposure to varying weather conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycomedicine: a Unique Class of Natural Products with Potent Anti-Tumour Bioactivities
    molecules Review Mycomedicine: A Unique Class of Natural Products with Potent Anti-tumour Bioactivities Rongchen Dai 1,†, Mengfan Liu 1,†, Wan Najbah Nik Nabil 1,2 , Zhichao Xi 1,* and Hongxi Xu 3,* 1 School of Pharmacy, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China; [email protected] (R.D.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (W.N.N.N.) 2 Pharmaceutical Services Program, Ministry of Health, Selangor 46200, Malaysia 3 Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (Z.X.); [email protected] (H.X) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Mycomedicine is a unique class of natural medicine that has been widely used in Asian countries for thousands of years. Modern mycomedicine consists of fruiting bodies, spores, or other tissues of medicinal fungi, as well as bioactive components extracted from them, including polysaccha- rides and, triterpenoids, etc. Since the discovery of the famous fungal extract, penicillin, by Alexander Fleming in the late 19th century, researchers have realised the significant antibiotic and other medic- inal values of fungal extracts. As medicinal fungi and fungal metabolites can induce apoptosis or autophagy, enhance the immune response, and reduce metastatic potential, several types of mush- rooms, such as Ganoderma lucidum and Grifola frondosa, have been extensively investigated, and anti- cancer drugs have been developed from their extracts. Although some studies have highlighted the anti-cancer properties of a single, specific mushroom, only limited reviews have summarised diverse medicinal fungi as mycomedicine. In this review, we not only list the structures and functions of pharmaceutically active components isolated from mycomedicine, but also summarise the mecha- Citation: Dai, R.; Liu, M.; Nik Nabil, W.N.; Xi, Z.; Xu, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Species of the Genus Tricholoma (Agaricales, Agaricomycetes) in Estonia
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 47: 27–36 (2010) Checklist of the species of the genus Tricholoma (Agaricales, Agaricomycetes) in Estonia Kuulo Kalamees Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 40 Lai St. 51005, Tartu, Estonia. Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 181 Riia St., 51014 Tartu, Estonia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: 42 species of genus Tricholoma (Agaricales, Agaricomycetes) have been recorded in Estonia. A checklist of these species with ecological, phenological and distribution data is presented. Kokkukvõte: Perekonna Tricholoma (Agaricales, Agaricomycetes) liigid Eestis Esitatakse kriitiline nimestik koos ökoloogiliste, fenoloogiliste ja levikuliste andmetega heiniku perekonna (Tricholoma) 42 liigi (Agaricales, Agaricomycetes) kohta Eestis. INTRODUCTION The present checklist contains 42 Tricholoma This checklist also provides data on the ecol- species recorded in Estonia. All the species in- ogy, phenology and occurrence of the species cluded (except T. gausapatum) correspond to the in Estonia (see also Kalamees, 1980a, 1980b, species conceptions established by Christensen 1982, 2000, 2001b, Kalamees & Liiv, 2005, and Heilmann-Clausen (2008) and have been 2008). The following data are presented on each proved by relevant exsiccates in the mycothecas taxon: (1) the Latin name with a reference to the TAAM of the Institute of Agricultural and Envi- initial source; (2) most important synonyms; (3) ronmental Sciences of the Estonian University reference to most important and representative of Life Sciences or TU of the Natural History pictures (iconography) in the mycological litera- Museum of the Tartu University. In this paper ture used in identifying Estonian species; (4) T. gausapatum is understand in accordance with data on the ecology, phenology and distribution; Huijsman, 1968 and Bon, 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • CZECH MYCOLOGY Publication of the Czech Scientific Society for Mycology
    CZECH MYCOLOGY Publication of the Czech Scientific Society for Mycology Volume 57 August 2005 Number 1-2 Central European genera of the Boletaceae and Suillaceae, with notes on their anatomical characters Jo s e f Š u t a r a Prosetická 239, 415 01 Tbplice, Czech Republic Šutara J. (2005): Central European genera of the Boletaceae and Suillaceae, with notes on their anatomical characters. - Czech Mycol. 57: 1-50. A taxonomic survey of Central European genera of the families Boletaceae and Suillaceae with tubular hymenophores, including the lamellate Phylloporus, is presented. Questions concerning the delimitation of the bolete genera are discussed. Descriptions and keys to the families and genera are based predominantly on anatomical characters of the carpophores. Attention is also paid to peripheral layers of stipe tissue, whose anatomical structure has not been sufficiently studied. The study of these layers, above all of the caulohymenium and the lateral stipe stratum, can provide information important for a better understanding of relationships between taxonomic groups in these families. The presence (or absence) of the caulohymenium with spore-bearing caulobasidia on the stipe surface is here considered as a significant ge­ neric character of boletes. A new combination, Pseudoboletus astraeicola (Imazeki) Šutara, is proposed. Key words: Boletaceae, Suillaceae, generic taxonomy, anatomical characters. Šutara J. (2005): Středoevropské rody čeledí Boletaceae a Suillaceae, s poznámka­ mi k jejich anatomickým znakům. - Czech Mycol. 57: 1-50. Je předložen taxonomický přehled středoevropských rodů čeledí Boletaceae a. SuiUaceae s rourko- vitým hymenoforem, včetně rodu Phylloporus s lupeny. Jsou diskutovány otázky týkající se vymezení hřibovitých rodů. Popisy a klíče k čeledím a rodům jsou založeny převážně na anatomických znacích plodnic.
    [Show full text]
  • Funghi Campania
    Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II” Dipartimento di Arboricoltura, Botanica e Patologia vegetale I funghi della Campania Emmanuele Roca, Lello Capano, Fabrizio Marziano Coordinamento editoriale: Michele Bianco, Italo Santangelo Progetto grafico: Maurizio Cinque, Pasquale Ascione Testi: Emmanuele Roca, Lello Capano, Fabrizio Marziano Coordinamento fotografico: Lello Capano Collaborazione: Gennaro Casato Segreteria: Maria Raffaela Rizzo Iniziativa assunta nell’ambito del Progetto CRAA “Azioni integrate per lo sviluppo razionale della funghicol- tura in Campania”; Coordinatore scientifico Prof.ssa Marisa Di Matteo. Foto di copertina: Amanita phalloides (Fr.) Link A Umberto Violante (1937-2001) Micologo della Scuola Partenopea I funghi della Campania Indice Presentazione........................................................................................... pag. 7 Prefazione................................................................................................ pag. 9 1 Campania terra di funghi, cercatori e studiosi....................................... pag. 11 2 Elementi di biologia e morfologia.......................................................... pag. 23 3 Principi di classificazione e tecniche di determinazione....................... pag. 39 4 Elenco delle specie presenti in Campania.............................................. pag. 67 5 Schede descrittive delle principali specie.............................................. pag. 89 6 Glossario...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tricholoma (Fr.) Staude in the Aegean Region of Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Botany Turk J Bot (2019) 43: 817-830 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/bot-1812-52 Tricholoma (Fr.) Staude in the Aegean region of Turkey İsmail ŞEN*, Hakan ALLI Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey Received: 24.12.2018 Accepted/Published Online: 30.07.2019 Final Version: 21.11.2019 Abstract: The Tricholoma biodiversity of the Aegean region of Turkey has been determined and reported in this study. As a consequence of field and laboratory studies, 31 Tricholoma species have been identified, and five of them (T. filamentosum, T. frondosae, T. quercetorum, T. rufenum, and T. sudum) have been reported for the first time from Turkey. The identification key of the determined taxa is given with this study. Key words: Tricholoma, biodiversity, identification key, Aegean region, Turkey 1. Introduction & Intini (this species, called “sedir mantarı”, is collected by Tricholoma (Fr.) Staude is one of the classic genera of local people for both its gastronomic and financial value) Agaricales, and more than 1200 members of this genus and T. virgatum var. fulvoumbonatum E. Sesli, Contu & were globally recorded in Index Fungorum to date (www. Vizzini (Intini et al., 2003; Vizzini et al., 2015). Additionally, indexfungorum.org, access date 23 April 2018), but many Heilmann-Clausen et al. (2017) described Tricholoma of them are placed in other genera such as Lepista (Fr.) ilkkae Mort. Chr., Heilm.-Claus., Ryman & N. Bergius as W.G. Sm., Melanoleuca Pat., and Lyophyllum P. Karst. a new species and they reported that this species grows in (Christensen and Heilmann-Clausen, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • The History, Fungal Biodiversity, Conservation, and Future Volume 1 · No
    IMA FungUs · vOlume 1 · no 2: 123–142 The history, fungal biodiversity, conservation, and future ARTICLE perspectives for mycology in Egypt Ahmed M. Abdel-Azeem Botany Department, Faculty of Science, University of Suez Canal, Ismailia 41522, Egypt; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Records of Egyptian fungi, including lichenized fungi, are scattered through a wide array Key words: of journals, books, and dissertations, but preliminary annotated checklists and compilations are not checklist all readily available. This review documents the known available sources and compiles data for more distribution than 197 years of Egyptian mycology. Species richness is analysed numerically with respect to the fungal diversity systematic position and ecology. Values of relative species richness of different systematic and lichens ecological groups in Egypt compared to values of the same groups worldwide, show that our knowledge mycobiota of Egyptian fungi is fragmentary, especially for certain systematic and ecological groups such as species numbers Agaricales, Glomeromycota, and lichenized, nematode-trapping, entomopathogenic, marine, aquatic and coprophilous fungi, and also yeasts. Certain groups have never been studied in Egypt, such as Trichomycetes and black yeasts. By screening available sources of information, it was possible to delineate 2281 taxa belonging to 755 genera of fungi, including 57 myxomycete species as known from Egypt. Only 105 taxa new to science have been described from Egypt, one belonging to Chytridiomycota, 47 to Ascomycota, 55 to anamorphic fungi and one to Basidiomycota. Article info: Submitted: 10 August 2010; Accepted: 30 October 2010; Published: 10 November 2010. INTRODUCTION which is currently accepted as a working figure although recognized as conservative (Hawksworth 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    The Rufford Foundation Final Report Congratulations on the completion of your project that was supported by The Rufford Foundation. We ask all grant recipients to complete a Final Report Form that helps us to gauge the success of our grant giving. The Final Report must be sent in word format and not PDF format or any other format. We understand that projects often do not follow the predicted course but knowledge of your experiences is valuable to us and others who may be undertaking similar work. Please be as honest as you can in answering the questions – remember that negative experiences are just as valuable as positive ones if they help others to learn from them. Please complete the form in English and be as clear and concise as you can. Please note that the information may be edited for clarity. We will ask for further information if required. If you have any other materials produced by the project, particularly a few relevant photographs, please send these to us separately. Please submit your final report to [email protected]. Thank you for your help. Josh Cole, Grants Director Grant Recipient Details Your name Nedim Jukić Research and Contribution to the Conservation of Project title Pezizales (Fungi) in Bosnia and Herzegovina RSG reference 13188-1 Reporting period April 2016 – May 2017 Amount of grant £4985 Your email address [email protected] Date of this report 30.05.2017. 1. Please indicate the level of achievement of the project’s original objectives and include any relevant comments on factors affecting this. Objective achieved Not achieved Partially achieved Fully Comments 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme & Abstracts
    European Council for Conservation of Fungi (European Mycological Association) International Society for Fungal Conservation Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje Macedonian Mycological Society Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia 1-6 October 2017 PROGRAMME & ABSTRACTS Organizing Committee Prof. Mitko Karadelev [Chair] Assistant Prof. Katerina Rusevska [Congress Secretary] Ms Daniela Mitic-Kopanja [Local Organizer] Ms Kristina Zimbakova [Local Organizer] Prof. Gerhard Kost [Field Trips] Dr Su Gonçalves [Co-chair ECCF, ex officio] Dr Beatrice Senn-Irlet [Co-chair ECCF, ex officio] Dr David Minter [President EMA, ex officio] Scientific support of the meeting: European Council for Conservation of Fungi; IUCN Species Survival Commission (Chytrid, Zygomycete, Downy Mildew and Slime Mould Specialist Group; Cup-fungi, Truffles and Allies Specialist Group; Lichen Specialist Group; Mushroom, Bracket and Puffball Specialist Group; Rust and Smut Specialist Group) and the Macedonian Mycological Society. Financial support of the Meeting: British Mycological Society; Cybertruffle; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ); Regional Rural Development Standing Working Group (SWG) in South-East Europe; Soloprom; Sofija - Printing House and Soloprom Company. European Council for Conservation of Fungi [www.eccf.eu] Established in 1985, the ECCF is the world’s oldest body devoted entirely to conservation of fungi. It aims to promote fungal conservation in Europe by stimulating production of continental-level, national and local red lists, by monitoring changes in and threats to fungal populations, and by drawing those changes and threats to the attention of decision makers, politicians and the public. Since 2003, it has been the conservation wing of the European Mycological Association and, since 2010, the voice of fungal conservation for Europe in the International Society for Fungal Conservation.
    [Show full text]