DOCSLIB.ORG

36Th Annual Virtual General Conference Preliminary Program, Hosted by Statistics Norway, August 23-27Th

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

36th Annual Virtual General Conference Preliminary Program, Hosted by Statistics Norway, August 23-27th Program as of August 27th All times are local time in Norway (CEST) Monday, August 23 2:00PM- 2:10PM CEST: Welcoming Remarks Welcoming Remarks Geir Axelsen (Director General, Statistics Norway) Marshall Reinsdorf (Chair of Conference Program Committee and Past President, IARIW) 2:10PM- 4PM CEST: Opening Plenary Organized by Statistics Norway Opening Plenary Session: Economic and Social Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic Organizer: Statistics Norway Chair: Linda Nøstbakken (Research Director, Statistics Norway) Bio 1. “The Great Lockdown: Dissecting the Economic Effects” Francesca Caselli (International Monetary Fund) Bio 2. “The Corona Pandemic – Consequences and Policies” Steinar Holden (University of Oslo, Norway) Bio 3. “COVID-19 Through the Lens of Real-time Micro Data for the Norwegian Labor Market” Simen Markussen (Frisch Centre for Economic Research, Norway) Bio Keynotes addresses will be followed by a panel discussion and questions from the floor. 4PM-4:30 PM CEST: Break 4:30PM- 6:30 PM CEST: Second Plenary IARIW Plenary Session: New Developments in Economic Measurement Organizer: Program Committee Chair: Kevin Fox (University of New South Wales, Australia) 1. “Quality Adjustment at Scale: Hedonic vs. Exact Demand- Based Price Indices” David Johnson (University of Michigan, United States), Matthew Shapiro (University of Michigan and NBER, United States), John Haltiwanger (University of Maryland and NBER, United States), Gabriel Ehrlich (University of Michigan, United States), Ron Jarmin (United States Census Bureau), Ed Olivares (University of Maryland, United States) and Laura Yi Zhao (University of Maryland, United States and Bank of Canada) [Background Paper] Proposal Discussant: Marshall Reinsdorf (IMF – Retired) 2. “The ONS Online Time Use Survey: Creating a Feasible Platform for 21st Century Time Use Data Collection” Gueorguie Vassilev (Office for National Statistics, UK), Susannah East (Office for National Statistics, UK), William King (Office for National Statistics, UK), Chris Payne (Office for National Statistics, UK) and Sally Wallace (Office for National Statistics, UK) Proposal Discussant: Joachim Merz (Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Germany) 3. “Wealth Inequality in the Long Run” Sonia Schifano (University of Luxembourg) and Guido Alfani (Bocconi University, Italy) Proposal Discussant: Lars Osberg (Dalhousie University, Canada) 4. “How Does Education Contribute to Productivity? An Intangible Infrastructure Approach Applied to the UK and the US.” Mary O’Mahony (King’s College London and Economics Statistics Center of Excellence, UK), Carol Corrado (The Conference Board and Georgetown University, United States) and Lea Samek (King’s College London and Economics Statistics Center of Excellence, UK) Proposal Discussant: Bart van Ark (University of Manchester, UK) 6:45- 8:00 CEST (Monday): Ruggles Lecture Chair: Marshall Reinsdorf (Past President, IARIW) Presentation of Ruggles Prize Ruggles Lecture: “Big Data for 21st Century Economic Statistics” Katharine Abraham (University of Maryland, United States) Presentation Recording of Ruggles Lecture: https://vimeo.com/593140108/3fc739947a Tuesday, August 24 1:00 PM – 1:45 PM (Tuesday): Poster Session 1 Poster Session 1A: 1. “Accounting for Non-market Household Production ‘Beyond GDP’: 20th Century Trends in Mother’s Milk Production” Julie Smith (Australian National University) Proposal 2. “Comparison of Equality and Levels of Wellbeing Across the Former USSR Countries Pre and Post Dissolution” Salih Abuelyamen (Association of Retired Staff of CBS Sudan) Proposal Poster Session 1B: 1. “Sustainability of the Process of Convergence in Poland” Dariusz Kotlewski (Warsaw School of Economics, Poland) and Miroslaw Blazej (Statistics Poland) Proposal 2.“A Manufacturing Renaissance? Industrialization Trends in the Developing World” Hagen Kruse (GGDC, University of Groningen), Emmanuel Mensah (GGDC, University of Groningen), Kunal Sen (UNU WIDER), and Gaaitzen de Vries (GGDC, University of Groningen) Proposal 2PM- 4PM CEST (Tuesday): Concurrent Sessions Session 1: Globalization, Trade in Services, and Intangibles: Conceptual Challenges and Measurement Issues Organizers: Philippe Stauffer (Swiss Federal Statistical Office), Sanjiv Mahajan (Office for National Statistics, UK), Tanja Mucha (Federal Statistical Office of Germany) and John Haas (National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg) Chair: Philippe Stauffer (Swiss Federal Statistical Office) 1. “Reclaiming Relevance of the SNA Core” Michael Osterwald-Lenum (Statistics Denmark) Proposal Discussant: Sanjiv Mahajan (Office for National Statistics, UK) 2. “Norwegian Enterprises Involved in Global Manufacturing. Some Practical and Conceptual Problems” Oeyvind Woxmyhr Bersaas (Statistics Norway) and Trude Nygaard Evensen (Statistics Norway) Proposal Discussant: Philippe Stauffer (Swiss Federal Statistical Office) 3. “Accounting for Intangibles” Samuel Kortum (Yale University, United States) and Jonathan Eaton (The Pennsylvania State University, United States) Proposal Discussant: Marshall Reinsdorf (IMF – Retired) 4. “The Treatment of International Sports Organizations in the Swiss National Accounts” Camille Gonseth (Swiss Federal Statistical Office) and Philippe Kuettel (Swiss Federal Statistical Office) Proposal Discussant: Sanjiv Mahajan (Office for National Statistics, UK) Session 2: The Potential and Challenges of Big Data and other Alternative Data in the Production of Prices, National Accounts, and Measures of Economic Well-Being Organizers: Catherine Van Rompaey (World Bank), Thesia I. Garner (Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States), and Mary O’Mahony (King’s College London and Economics Statistics Center of Excellence, UK) Chair: Mary O’Mahony (King’s College London and Economics Statistics Center of Excellence, UK) 1. “On Top of the Top. Adjusting Wealth Distributions Using National Rich Lists” Franziska Disslbacher (Vienna University of Economics and Business), Michael Ertl (Austrian Federal Chamber of Labor), Emanuel List (Vienna University of Economics and Business and Macroeconomic Policy Institute), Patrick Mokre (Austrian Federal Chamber of Labor and The New School), and Matthias Schnetzer (Austrian Federal Chamber of Labor) Proposal Discussant: Kevin Moore (Federal Reserve Board, United States) 2. “Digital Opportunity: How Cloud Computing Changes the Shape of the UK Economy” Oleksii Romanko (Kings College London, UK) Proposal Discussant: Rebecca Riley (Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE), UK) 3. “What’s in a Job? Measuring Skills From Online Job Adverts” Gueorguie Vassilev (Office for National Statistics, UK), Khloe Evans (Office for National Statistics, UK), and Oleksii Romanko (King’s College London, UK)Proposal Discussant: Lea Samek (OECD) 4. “Hedonic Imputation with Tree-based Decision Approaches” Shipei Zeng (University of New South Wales, Australia and Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data, China) Proposal Discussant: Ana Aizcorbe (Bureau of Economic Analysis, United States) Session 3: Time Use, Welfare and GDP I Organizers: Diane Coyle (Cambridge University, UK), Leonard Nakamura (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, United States) and Kevin Fox (University of New South Wales, Australia) Chair: Kevin Fox (University of New South Wales, Australia) 1. “Time Use and Household-Centric Measurement of Welfare in the Digital Economy” Leonard Nakamura (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, United States) and Diane Coyle (Cambridge University, UK) Proposal Discussant: Paul Schreyer (OECD, France) 2. “Accounting for Free Digital Services and Household Production — An Application to Facebook” Paul Schreyer (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) Proposal Discussant: Diane Coyle (Cambridge University, UK) 3. “Household Innovation and R&D: Bigger Than You Think” Dan Sichel (Wellesley College, United States) and Eric von Hippel (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States) [Abstract] Discussant: Nick Oulton (London School of Economics, UK) 4. “Labor Market Trends and the Changing Value of Time” Job Boerma (University of Minnesota, United States) and Loukas Karabarbounis (University of Minnesota and National Bureau of Economic Research, United States) Proposal Discussant: Leonard Nakamura (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia) Session 4: Globalization and Inequality I Organizers: Gaaitzen de Vries (University of Groningen, Netherlands) and Marcel Timmer (University of Groningen, Netherlands) Chair: Gaaitzen de Vries (University of Groningen, Netherlands) 1. “Is the Financial Market Driving the Income Distribution? – An analysis of the Linkage between Income and Wealth in Europe” Ilja Kristian Kavonius (European Central Bank) and Veli- Matti Toermaelehto (European Central Bank) Proposal Discussant: Tsvetana Spasova (University of Basel, Switzerland) 2. “Between Sticky Floors and Glass Ceilings: The Effect of Trade Liberalization on Double Discrimination in Brazil” Laura Diniz Penteado de Barros (University of Göttingen, Germany) and Manuel Santos Silva (University of Münster, Germany) Proposal Discussant: Matteo Targa (German Institute for Economic Research) 3. “Decomposing the Between-firm Employment Earnings Dispersion in the Canadian Business Sector: The Role of Firm Characteristics” Beiling Yan (OECD), Wulong Gu (Statistics Canada) and Douwere Grekou (Statistics Canada) Proposal Discussant: Gaaitzen de Vries (University
Recommended publications
  • Harry T. Reis Curriculum Vitae

    Harry T. Reis Curriculum Vitae

    October 2019 Harry T. Reis Curriculum Vitae Contact Information Office: Department of Clinical and Social Home: 752 Meigs Street Sciences in Psychology Rochester, NY l4620 University of Rochester Box 270266 Rochester, NY 14627 Voice: (585) 275-8697 Tel.: (585) 244-6404 Fax: (585) 273-1100 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.psych.rochester.edu/people/reis_harry/index.html Title: Professor of Psychology and Dean's Professor in Arts, Sciences, and Engineering Date of Birth: March 28, 1949 Education B.S. City College of New York, 1970 (cum laude, major in psychology) M.A. New York University, 1972 (social-personality psychology) Ph.D. New York University, February, 1975 (social-personality psychology) Fellowships, Honors and Awards 1966 – 1970 New York State Regents Scholarship 1970 B.S. cum laude, City College of New York 1970 – 1971 National Institute of Mental Health Training Fellowship 1984 Fellow, American Psychological Association (Divisions 8, 9) 1986 – 1987 Faculty Mentor, University of Rochester (College of Arts & Science) 1988 Charter Fellow, American Psychological Society 1991 Fulbright Senior Research Fellowship (Netherlands) 2000 University of Rochester Bridging Fellowship (Fall) 2002 President (elected position), International Society for the Study of Personal Relationships. 2003 Named to Golden Key International Honor Society (Faculty) 2006 Distinguished Contribution to the Society Award, Society for Personality and Social Psychology 2007 President (elected position), Society for Personality and Social Psychology
  • Sustainability and Development Conference

    Sustainability and Development Conference

    Sustainability and Development Conference NOVEMBER 9-11, 2018 ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN @umsustdev #SANDMEET umsustdev.org Friday November 9 2018 FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 9 OPTIONAL WORKSHOPS (Advanced registration is required) 9:00-12:00 A1. Critical Dialogue to Enhance Effectiveness in the Practice of Sustainable University League Development (Facilitators: Anna Malavisi, Western Connecticut State University, and (Room D) Marisa Rinkus, Michigan State University) 9:00-12:00 A3. Open-Source Analysis of SDGs at the Food-Water-Energy Nexus Using Global, Dana Building Gridded Modeling (Facilitator: David Johnson, Purdue University) (Room 2315) 13:00-15:30 B1. Improving Evaluation in Foreign Aid (Facilitator: Paul Clements, Western Michigan University League University) (Room D) 13:00-16:00 B2. An Introduction to Using Case-Based Learning in the Classroom and Beyond University League (Facilitators: Meghan Wagner, University of Michigan, Stphanie Kusano, University of (Room 4) Michigan) 14:00-16:00 Early Check-in: Pick up badge and conference materials Dana Building (1st Flr Commons) 16:30-18:00 Plenary roundtable welcome remarks: Arun Agrawal, University of Michigan Modern Languages Building (MLB) Welcome Plenary Roundtable: “Careers and Opportunities in Sustainable Development” (Auditorium 3) Cris Doby, Erb Family Foundation Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy Catherine Harris, Acre Shelie Miller, School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan Samuel Passmore, Mott Foundation Jennifer Haverkamp, Graham Sustainability Institute, University of Michigan Moderator: Shelie Miller, University of Michigan 18:30-20:00 Welcome Reception Dana Building - Check-in station in Room 1040 (1st Floor - Appetizers and non-alcoholic beverages will be served Commons) - Conference welcome remarks: Jonathan Overpeck, Dean, School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan SDC PREFERRED HOTEL PARTICIPANTS: Look for SDC Resource Team Members to lead you to CCTC for bus service back to your hotel area at 20:00 and at 20:30.
  • A Geological History of Groningen's Subsurface

    A Geological History of Groningen's Subsurface

    A geological history of Groningen’s subsurface Erik Meijles, University of Groningen Date June 2015 Editors Jan van Elk & Dirk Doornhof Translated by E.L. Howard General introduction Ground acceleration caused by an induced earthquake is strongly dependent on the composition of local shallow soils. NAM commissioned Deltares to conduct a detailed survey of the shallow subsurface above the Groningen gas field. The survey focuses on Quaternary geology with an emphasis on the upper 50 metres. This report provides an introduction to Groningen’s Quaternary geology as a background to the comprehensive Deltares report, which has culminated in a detailed model of Groningen’s shallow subsurface. This report was written by Dr ir Erik Meijles, Assistant Professor of Physical Geography at the University of Groningen. Wim Dubelaar, Dr Jan Stafleu and Dr Wim Westerhoff of TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands (TNO- NITG) in Utrecht assisted with editing this report and provided a number of key diagrams. Title A geological history of Groningen’s subsurface Date June 2015 Client NAM Author Erik Meijles, Assistant Professor Edited by Jan van Elk of Physical Geography and Dirk Doornhof Organization University of Groningen Organization NAM Significance for Research theme: earthquake Predicting ground acceleration research Explanation: Ground acceleration caused by an induced earthquake is strongly dependent on the composition of local shallow soils. NAM commissioned Deltares to conduct a detailed survey of the shallow subsurface above the Groningen gas field. This survey focuses on the Quaternary geology of Groningen with an emphasis on the upper 50 metres. Directly This research serves as background to the report entitled ‘Geological schematisation of related the shallow subsurface of Groningen’ written by various Deltares staff members.
  • Serving the Northern Netherlands Groningen Airport Eelde the Northern Netherlands: Groningen, Drenthe, Friesland

    Serving the Northern Netherlands Groningen Airport Eelde the Northern Netherlands: Groningen, Drenthe, Friesland

    Serving the Northern Netherlands Groningen Airport Eelde The Northern Netherlands: Groningen, Drenthe, Friesland 10% of Dutch population The Guardian: Groningen happiest city of Europe From Cow to Google Groningen Airport Eelde (GRQ) is the only airport in the densely- populated Benelux/ Northwest Germany region that does not overlap catchment areas with other airports. GRQ is not slot-constrained and has capacity for growth. Copenhagen 2019 2014 London Best in class in Diary; Milk reservoir of Europe Worldclass Research Institutes; Agribusiness Van Hall Larenstein and University of Groningen International trade Nobel prize winning research (nanotech) Life Science, Modern and innovative business cluster Health & Medical Largest University Hospital in the Netherlands (12,141 employees) Organ Transplantation Hotspot Technology Abundance of feedstock Large scale green energy Energy Transition development Power to gas (Hydrogen) and Biobased Green dataport Eemshaven (data center development) Chemicals Green energy supply; 600 MW Gemini Wind International fiber connections Home to the smartest production facilities in the world World class materials research (Zernike Institute) High tech industry Big data Fleet management & Crewing Maritime sector Specialty ship building Tourism Culture Sports Within 30 minutes – 575,000 inhabitants Within 45 minutes – 1,279,000 inhabitants Within 60 minutes – 2,079,000 inhabitants Major leakage effect Minor leakage effect Route potential from GRQ Leakage analysis results Currently Destination Name Upper range
  • Main Results Test with Hydrogen Train in Groningen

    Main Results Test with Hydrogen Train in Groningen

    MAIN RESULTS TEST WITH HYDROGEN TRAIN IN GRONINGEN CONTENTS Main Results of the Hydrogen Train Test in Groningen Result of test with hydrogen train in Groningen .......................................................4 The Test Dispensation .................................6 The Trial Runs ................................................7 The Refueling Process ..............................17 Press- and Public Information Day ........21 RESULT OF TEST WITH HYDROGEN TRAIN IN GRONINGEN At the start of 2020, after a long preparation period of as much as one and a half year, the Province of Groningen, together with various partners, did a feasibility study in the form of a pilot test with a hydrogen (battery) train (running on green hydrogen) to explore whether this could be a full-fledged sustainable alternative to the current diesel trains. The Province of Groningen sees an important role for green hydrogen • For greening the chemical sector (raw material). • As a fuel in heavy mobility (buses, trains, trucks, ships, aircraft). • As an essential piece of the puzzle regarding energy transition (storage, transportation). • This will also create new economic opportunities and employment. Pilot The trial runs were done on the track between Groningen and Leeuwarden during nighttime for a period of two weeks, with a passenger train running on green hydrogen. During the tests, the train ran a number of times at normal speed – without passengers – alternately as an intercity- and a local train – between the stations of Groningen and Leeuwarden. By these trial runs, practical experience was gained in running on hydrogen. This was the first time a train ran on hydrogen in the Netherlands. The tests focused on, among other things, the actual running, fuel consumption, and refueling.
  • Towards Smart Rural Transport Areas: the SMARTA Project Andrea Lorenzini Giorgio Ambrosino Memex Srl

    Towards Smart Rural Transport Areas: the SMARTA Project Andrea Lorenzini Giorgio Ambrosino Memex Srl

    Towards Smart Rural Transport Areas: the SMARTA Project Andrea Lorenzini Giorgio Ambrosino MemEx Srl Webinar series June –July 2020 SMARTA Webinar | 17th June 2020 www.ruralsharedmobility.eu 2 The context A quarter of Europe’s population lives in rural areas, that is about 150 million people Naturally diffuse, much higher need for mobility than in urban areas Public transport weak, high dependency on private car Mobility How to live a daily life without a car Traffic generated The issues in rural areas Environment SMARTA | Smart Rural Transport Areas 3 Mobility in rural areas needs attention Cities Depopulation Austerity Ageing measures population Towns and suburbs 27% of Europe’s population means 137 million people, which equates to the population of the 40 largest Metropolitan areas in Europe Rural areas Same level of attention not been paid in transport policy, innovation, capital investment and ongoing subsidy for rural mobility needs Distribution of population (%) by degree of urbanisation, EU-28 Eurostat 2017 SMARTA | Smart Rural Transport Areas 4 The SMARTA Project www.ruralsharedmobility.eu Sponsored by European Parliament Funded through EU Transport Explore ways to ensure sustainable Ministry - DG MOVE mobility by improving shared mobility integrated with public transport services The SMARTA Consortium across different European rural areas 3 Main strands of activities Research Demonstration Engagement Recommendations and Policy Guidelines SMARTA | Smart Rural Transport Areas 5 Rural shared mobility landscape Asset sharing Flexible Transport Services Allows the traveller to utilise/pick- Include a range of services that act as an up a specific means of transport additional layer between conventional (bike, car, e-scooter, etc.) without (fixed route and schedule based) any property issue; users must be transport and personal transport (car or registered.
  • University of Groningen Struggling for Recognition and Affordable Housing

    University of Groningen Struggling for Recognition and Affordable Housing

    University of Groningen Struggling for recognition and affordable housing in Amsterdam and Hamburg Buchholz, Tino IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2016 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Buchholz, T. (2016). Struggling for recognition and affordable housing in Amsterdam and Hamburg: Resignation, resistance, relocation. University of Groningen. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 28-09-2021 Struggling for recognition and affordable housing in Amsterdam and Hamburg: resignation, resistance, relocation Tino Buchholz dedicated to M ISBN: 978-90-367-8973-8 Copyright © 2016, Tino Buchholz.
  • University of Luxembourg Luxembourg - January 2009

    University of Luxembourg Luxembourg - January 2009

    EXTERNAL EVALUATION REPORT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG LUXEMBOURG - JANUARY 2009 BY THE COMMITTEE OF EXTERNAL EVALUATION Table of Contents Foreword by the President of the Evaluation Committee 3 The Committee of External Evaluation 4 Introduction 5 General background 5 The evaluation method 6 Evaluation Outcomes regarding Teaching and Learning 8 Teaching and learning at faculty level 8 Further matters pertaining to teaching and learning 10 Evaluation Outcomes regarding Research 12 Evaluation Outcomes regarding Organization and Management 15 Main achievements of the University of Luxembourg 15 The realization of the founding principles 16 General governance 17 Stakeholder relations 18 Central management 18 Central services and infrastructure 20 Central administration 20 Library and library services 20 Physical facilities 20 Student services 20 International mobility for students and teaching staff 21 IT services 21 Financial management 21 Research funding 21 1 Human resources management 22 Communication policy 23 Faculty management 23 Quality assurance 24 Recommendations 25 Introductory remarks 25 Regarding governance, organisation and management of the university 26 Regarding central services 26 Regarding research 27 Regarding teaching and learning 28 Regarding quality assurance 28 Annexes l - lX: Reports on the Faculties and the Research Priorities 29 Annexes X -Xl: Site visits and List of panel members and secretaries 135 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. GRADING SCALE 7 TABLE 2. GRADING OF TEACHING AND LEARNING AT FACULTY LEVEL 9 TABLE 3. GRADING OF RESEARCH AT PRIORITY LEVEL 14 2 External Evaluation Report FOREWORD This `rst external evaluation of the University of Luxembourg is the work of many contributors, and I would like to thank them all.
  • Egba Land and Slavery, 1830-1914

    Egba Land and Slavery, 1830-1914

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Munich RePEc Personal Archive MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Land abundance and economic institutions: Egba land and slavery, 1830-1914 James Fenske Yale University 15. March 2010 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25630/ MPRA Paper No. 25630, posted 6. October 2010 15:05 UTC LAND ABUNDANCE AND ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS: EGBA LAND AND SLAVERY, 1830-1914 JAMES FENSKEy ABSTRACT. The “land abundance” view of African history uses sparse population to ex- plain economic institutions. I use colonial court records to show that the Egba of Nigeria fit this theory’s predictions. Before 1914, the Egba had poorly defined land rights, relied on dependant and forced labor, and used labor to secure loans. These institutions re- sponded to the changing availability of land, labor and capital. An initial period of land scarcity altered land ownership. A market existed for the most valuable land. Slaves were used by those with better opportunities to acquire them, and credit expanded after the introduction of tree crops. 1. INTRODUCTION According to the “land abundance” view of African history, the continent’s economic institutions before colonial rule were decisively shaped by its sparse population (Austin, 2008, 2009b; Hopkins, 1973; Iliffe, 1995). With land freely available, land markets were undeveloped and rights were rarely permanent or individual. Wage labor was absent, since potential farmers could work on their own accounts. Instead, slaves, wives and dependants were the principal sources of labor. Because land had no value as collateral, credit markets were characterized by high interest rates, and human pawns were used to secure loans.
  • Province House

    Province House

    The Province House SEAT OF PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT Colophon Production and final editing: Province of Groningen Photographs: Alex Wiersma and Jur Bosboom (Province of Groningen), Rien Linthout and Jenne Hoekstra Provincie Groningen Postbus 610 • 9700 AP Groningen +31 (0)50 - 316 41 60 www.provinciegroningen.nl [email protected] 2020 The Province House Seat of Provincial Government PREFACE The present and the past connected with each other. That is how you could describe the Groningen Province House. No. 12 Martinikerkhof is the ‘old’ Province House, which houses the State Hall where the Provincial Council has met since 16 June 1602. That is unique for the Netherlands. No other province has used the same assembly hall for so long. The connection with the present is formed by the aerial bridge to the ‘new’ Province House. This section of the Province House was designed by the architect Mels Crouwel and was opened on 7 May 1996 by Queen Beatrix. Both buildings have their own ambiance, their own history and their own works of art. The painting ‘Religion and Freedom’ by Hermannus Collenius (1650-1723) hangs in the State Hall and paintings by the artistic movement De Ploeg are in the building on the Martinikerkhof. The new section features work by contemporary artists such as Rebecca Horn. Her ‘The ballet of the viewers’ hangs in the hall. The binoculars observe the entrance hall and look out, through the transparent façades, to the outside world. But there is a lot more to see. And this brochure tells you everything about the past and present of the Province House.
  • Making Sense of Big Data in Health Research: Towards an EU Action Plan

    Making Sense of Big Data in Health Research: Towards an EU Action Plan

    Auffray et al. Genome Medicine (2016) 8:118 DOI 10.1186/s13073-016-0376-y ERRATUM Open Access Erratum to: Making sense of big data in health research: towards an EU action plan Charles Auffray1,2*, Rudi Balling3*, Inês Barroso4, László Bencze5, Mikael Benson6, Jay Bergeron7, Enrique Bernal-Delgado8, Niklas Blomberg9, Christoph Bock10,11,12, Ana Conesa13,14, Susanna Del Signore15, Christophe Delogne16, Peter Devilee17, Alberto Di Meglio18, Marinus Eijkemans19, Paul Flicek20, Norbert Graf21, Vera Grimm22, Henk-Jan Guchelaar23, Yi-Ke Guo24, Ivo Glynne Gut25, Allan Hanbury26, Shahid Hanif27, Ralf-Dieter Hilgers28, Ángel Honrado29, D. Rod Hose30, Jeanine Houwing-Duistermaat31, Tim Hubbard32,33, Sophie Helen Janacek20, Haralampos Karanikas34, Tim Kievits35, Manfred Kohler36, Andreas Kremer37, Jerry Lanfear38, Thomas Lengauer12, Edith Maes39, Theo Meert40, Werner Müller41, Dörthe Nickel42, Peter Oledzki43, Bertrand Pedersen44, Milan Petkovic45, Konstantinos Pliakos46, Magnus Rattray41, Josep Redón i Màs47, Reinhard Schneider3, Thierry Sengstag48, Xavier Serra-Picamal49, Wouter Spek50, Lea A. I. Vaas36, Okker van Batenburg50, Marc Vandelaer51, Peter Varnai52, Pablo Villoslada53, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno20, John Peter Mary Wubbe54 and Gianluigi Zanetti55,56 Erratum Inc., 300 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. 8Institute for Health Sciences, IACS - IIS Aragon, San Juan Bosco 13, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain. The published article [1] has two points of confusion in 9ELIXIR, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK. the section entitled “Technical challenges related to the 10CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of 11 management of electronic health records”. Firstly, the Sciences, Lazarettgasse 14, AKH BT25.2, 1090 Vienna, Austria. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, AKH International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC) BT25.2, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Introducing TEPSA Member Institutes

    Introducing TEPSA Member Institutes

    Trans European Policy Studies Association (TEPSA) Rue d’Egmont 11 – 1000 Brussels + 32 2 5113470 www.tepsa.eu Introducing TEPSA member institutes Table of contents TEPSA Full Members ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Austria: Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS)…………………………………………………….1 Bulgaria: New Bulgarian University (NBU) …………………………………………………...2 Croatia: Institute for Development and International Relations (IRMO) ……………………….....3 Cyprus: Cyprus Center for European and International Affairs (CEEIA) – University of Nicosia…....4 Czech Republic: Institute of International Relations (IIR) ………………………………………5 Denmark: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) …………………………………….6 Estonia: Estonian Foreign Policy Institute (EVI) ………………………………………………6 Finland: Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FIIA) ………………………………………..7 France: Centre d’Etudes Européennes (CEE), Sciences Po Paris………………………………8 Germany: Institut für Europäische Politik (IEP) ………………………………………………10 Georgia: PMC Research Center……………………………………………………………11 Greece: Centre of European Studies and Research (EKEME)/European Public Law Organization (EPLO) ………………………………………………………………………………….13 Hungary: Institute for World Economics, Research Centre for Economic and Regional Studies (IWE) ………………………………………………………………………………………....13 Institute of International Affairs (IIA) and Centre for Small State Studies (CSSS) – University of Iceland…………………………………………………………………………………..15 Ireland: Institute