DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding the Impacts of Digital Developments in Theatres On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

From Live-to-Digital Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution October 2016 by AEA Consulting for Arts Council England, UK Theatre and Society of London Theatre FROM LIVE-TO-DIGITAL aeaconsulting.com 2 Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution Arts Council England (ACE) champions, develops and Report invests in artistic and cultural experiences that enrich people’s lives. The organisation supports activities Commissioners across the arts, museums and libraries – from theatre and Funders to digital art, reading to dance, music to literature, and crafts to collections. Between 2015 and 2018, ACE plans to invest £1.1 billion of public money from government and an estimated £700 million from the National Lottery to help create art and culture experiences for everyone, everywhere. UK Theatre is the UK’s leading theatre and performing arts membership organisation. The organisation promotes excellence, professional development, and campaign to improve resilience and increase audiences across the sector. UK Theatre supports organisations and individuals in the performing arts at any stage of their career, through a range of training, events and other professional services. Whether it’s through sharing knowledge, bringing you together with the right people or providing practical advice, UK Theatre supports you and your work Society of London Theatre (SOLT) is an organisation that works with and on behalf of its Members to champion theatre and the performing arts. SOLT delivers a range of services both to assist members and to promote theatregoing to the widest possible audience. FROM LIVE-TO-DIGITAL aeaconsulting.com 3 Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution The study team for this report comprised Brent Karpf Reidy, Senior Consultant; About the Becky Schutt, Senior Associate; Deborah Abramson, Associate; and Antoni Durski, Research Analyst of AEA Consulting. Elizabeth Ellis, Managing Principal, Authors and Laura Casale, Director of Knowledge Management of AEA served as editors. David Throsby, Distinguished Professor of Economics at Macquarie University in Sydney, acted as Senior Advisor to the research team. AEA Consulting is one of the world’s leading cultural consulting firms. Since 1991, we have helped hundreds of cultural organizations, governments, foundations, businesses, and individuals around the world realize the contribution that culture can make to communities. AEA has successfully completed more than 800 projects in 33 countries. Our work combines a deep knowledge of trends in culture and adjacent sectors with robust research and analysis. We thrive on new challenges and approach problem solving with curiosity, creativity, and integrity. The project was guided throughout by a Steering Committee whose members included: ■ Jonathon Blackburn, Senior Officer, Policy and Research, Arts Council England ■ Cassie Chadderton, Head of UK Theatre and Membership (and represent- ing Society of London Theatre) ■ Michelle Dickson, Director for Touring, Arts Council England ■ Paul Glinkowski, Senior Manager, Creative Media, Arts Council England ■ Andrew Mowlah, Director, Policy & Research, Arts Council England (and Project Director). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors are grateful to the Steering Committee and to the wide range of people who participated in this study for their time, candour and insights. The primary research conducted for this project would not have been possible with the generous support and assistance from a coalition of industry partners, listed on the following page. Dozens of theatre professionals and audience members shared their views with us through interviews and focus groups and hundreds took part in comprehensive online surveys. It is the commissioners’ and authors’ hope that the study helps to move the Live-to-Digital conversation forward, giving arts organisations of all sizes better understanding of ways to leverage new technologies – if they are so inclined. FROM LIVE-TO-DIGITAL aeaconsulting.com 4 Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution INDUSTRY PARTNERS Aran Dramatica Northumberland Theatre Company Babbling Vagabonds Nunu Theatre Barn Cinema Orion Cinema Belarus Free Theatre PCM creative Belgrade Theatre Pegasus Theatre Bike Shed Theatre Pentabus Theatre Bishops Castle Platform 4 Brewery Arts Proteus Theatre Calestrad (music band) Puppet Craft CDET Rambert Central Bedfordshire Council Riverside Studios Concert Theatre Royal Shakespeare Company Create London Saffron Screen Defnet Media Scott Cinemas Digital Theatre Sheffield Theatres Eastern Angles Sight for Surrey Eclipse Theatre Stag Community Arts Centre English Touring Theatre Stage Text Event Cinema Association (including its members) Strode College Falkirk Community Trust Surrey County Council Fiery Angel Talking Birds Firestation Centre for Arts and Culture Tara Arts Forum Cinema The Regal Cinema Full House The Stables Gecko Theatre The Yard Theatre Grassington Festival Theatre Royal, Newcastle Haver Hill Arts Centre Theatre Royal, Winchester Hoipolloi Theatrical Niche Include Arts Time Won’t Wait ITC Arts Tyneside Cinema Jam Jar Cinema Vincent Dance Theatre Live Theatre, Newcastle Vocal Eyes Miracle Theatre Vortex Jazz Miss Nightingale Wales Millennium Centre National Theatre Wem Town Hall Northern Ballet Wotton Cinema Northern Stage Young Vic Theatre FROM LIVE-TO-DIGITAL aeaconsulting.com 5 Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution The liveness of theatre, music and dance is an inalienable element of human Foreword life. For centuries these performing arts have been experienced by people in the same space and at the same time as the creative process happens, and the desire by audiences for this sort of immediate connection with artists in the act of performance continues unchanged. But more than a century ago technology intervened. The invention of revolutionary methods for sound reproduction led to continually evolving means of capturing and redistrib- uting music, to the point where we have become accustomed to listening to music through channels far removed from the original performance. Yet even here, there remains a demand by music-lovers to hear music of all types in the actual presence of the musicians – an experience that can never be replaced, no matter how perfect the reproduced sound might be. For theatre, opera and dance the impact of technology has been much more recent. Although capturing live performance on film or for television has been around for many years, it is barely a decade since the first moves were made by the National Theatre in the UK and Metropolitan Opera in the US and towards digital transmission of live performances to locations a long way from the theatre. Since those early days the amount of Live-to-Digital activity across the performing arts has expanded enormously in volume and range. The ra- pidity of this growth has raised some serious questions: In what ways are arts organisations, distributors, funding agencies and consumers reacting to these developments? How are audiences responding to the availability of new chan- nels for consuming traditional products? How do these trends impact upon the need to protect the artistic and cultural integrity of live performance? Is expanded consumption of digital product being achieved at the expense of live attendance at traditional performing arts venues? What is driving the digital market: is it growth in supply, or is it that the availability of new media for the distribution and reception of product is stimulating a latent demand? A great deal of anecdotal evidence on various aspects of these questions has accumulated in recent times. But, while frequently interesting, the impression it creates may be misleading, and is no substitute for systematic and objective research. So the purpose of this study has been to replace anecdote with hard data. The study is based primarily on theatre in England. Nevertheless, the report contains information and draws conclusions relevant across art-form boundaries, and national jurisdictions. The project applies carefully controlled research methods to derive a wide range of objective and replicable data that provide an extensive overview of the main components of the supply chain for Live-to-Digital product. The conclusions derived from the findings of the research point to both opportunities and challenges in the theatre sector and beyond as the digital environment continues to evolve. FROM LIVE-TO-DIGITAL aeaconsulting.com 6 Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution In a report such as this, the use of words such as ‘industry’, ‘product’, ‘demand’, ‘consumers’ and so on derived from economics, commerce, marketing and management – fields far removed from the arts – is sometimes seen as a sell- out of the pure creative process to the insidious forces of the marketplace. An important strength of this report is that although it uses these terms – and indeed provides an extremely useful glossary to help us find our way through the new terminology – it respects the fundamental and unchanging nature of the performing arts as an expression of human culture. The data gathered and the conclusions drawn in the report will be of great assistance to performing companies as they seek
Recommended publications
  • Barrington Pheloung's Cv

    Barrington Pheloung's Cv

    BARRINGTON PHELOUNG’S CV 2004/05 FILMS SHOPGIRL Production Company: Hyde Park Entertainment Directed by: Anand Tucker Produced by: Jon Jashni, Ashok Amritraj & Steve Martin Written by: Steve Martin LITTLE FUGITIVE Production Company: Little Fugitive Directed by: Joanna Lipper Produced by: Joanna Lipper, Vince Maggio, Nicholas Paleologos & Fredrick Zollo Written by: Joanna Lipper A PREVIOUS ENGAGEMENT Production Company: Bucaneer Films Directed by: Joan Carr-Wiggin Produced by: Joan Carr-Wiggin , David Gordian & Damita Nikapota Written by: Joan Carr-Wiggin TELEVISION IMAGINE: SMOKING DIARIES Directed by: Margy Kinmonth Production Company: BBC THE WORLD OF NAT KING COLE Produced by: Kari Lia Production Company: Double Jab Productions 2002/03 FILMS TOUCHING WILD HORSES Production Company: Animal Tales Productions Inc. Directed by: Eleanore Lindo Produced by: Lewis B. Chesler, David M. Perlmutter, Frank Huebner, Rob Vaughan Written by: Murray McRae TELEVISION THE STRANGE TALE OF BARRY WHO Directed by: Margy Kinmonth Documentary on Barry Joule Produced by: Margy Kinmonth/Sam Organ Production Company: Darlowsmithson Productions For BBC4. MOVE TO LEARN Directed by: Sheila Liljeqvist Documentary for Video Produced by: Sheila Liljeqvist and Barbara Pheloung Australian documentary, children with learning difficulties. SHORTS ARDEEVAN Short Feature film made in the UK. Directed and Produced by: Jonathan Richardson NIGHT’S NOONTIME Short Feature film made in the Canada. Executive Producers: Richard Clifford & Amar Singh Produced by: Hanna Tower Directed
  • Julia Smith Lighting CV.Pages

    Julia Smith Lighting CV.Pages

    CV Lighting Designer Julia Smith 1991: BBC camera trainee - Studios, Film & OBs 1992: BBC camera woman 1996: BBC Lighting & vision operator (racks) 1999: BBC Lighting & vision supervisor (console operator) 2002: Freelance Lighting director & console operator Production History Lighting Designer Rob Beckett’s Playing for Rumpus Media Channel 4 Hospital Studios Time The Darkness of John Phil McIntyre TV Not broadcast as yet BBC Radio Theatre Robbins Tim Vine Travels in Time Baby Cow Productions BBC1 Pinewood Studios Citizen Khan BBC Comedy BBC 1 Dock 10 Yes Primeminister BBC Comedy UKTV TVC Lighting Director - original designs by other Lighting designers Harry Hill’s Alien Fun Capsule CPL Productions ITV 1 TLS Live From the BBC Phil McIntyre TV BBC2 BBC Radio Theatre Cats Do Countdown Zeppatron Productions Channel 4 Dock 10 Eggheads 12 Yard Productions BBC1 BBC2 BBC Scotland Perfection 12 Yard Productions BBC1 BBC Scotland Who Dares Wins 12 Yard Productions BBC1 BBC Scotland Russel Howard’s Good News Avalon BBC2 BBC3 Riverside Studios Sheperton, TLS Unspun with Matt Ford Avalon Dave TLS Question of Sport BBC Entertainment BBC1 Dock 10 Insert Name Here 12 Yard Productions BBC2 Pinewood Studios Football on Five Sunset & Vine Channel 5 Sky Studios Various BT Sport Timeline BT Sport Channel International Broadcasting programmes Centre Dog Ate my homework BBC Children’s Glasgow CBBC Pacific Quay !1 of !3 Production History Vision Supervisor or Console Operator Sitcom Upstart Crow BBC Comedy BBC 2 TLS Not Going Out Avalon BBC 1 TVC, Teddington
  • Duquesne University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania UNDERGRADUATE

    Duquesne University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania UNDERGRADUATE

    ^^Mj ADDRESS— University, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pa 15282 Telephone Call specific Centrex (Direct Dial) number (see following), for other offices, call 434-6000 ADMISSION— Director of Admissions, Administration Building, First Floor Telephone (412) 434-6220/6221/6222 Duquesne University ADVISORS College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, College Hall, Room 215 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Telephone (412) 434-6394/6395/6396 School of Business and Administration, Rockwell Hall, Room 403 Telephone (412) 434-6277/6278 School of Education, Canevin Hall, Room 214 Telephone (412) 434-6118/6119 School of Music, Room 315 Telephone (412) 434-6083 UNDERGRADUATE School of Nursing, College Hall Room 637D Telephone (412) 434-6346/6347 School of Pharmacy, Mellon Hall of Science, Room 421 Telephone (412) 434-6385/6365 ROTC—College Hall, Fourth Floor Telephone (412) 434-6614/666416665 6 BOOKSTORE — Duquesne Union, Second Floor Telephone (412) 434-6626 CAMPUS MINISTRY—Administration Building, First Floor (r, , Published annually in July by Duquesne University 600 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15282 Telephone (412) 434-6020 CAREER PLANNING AND PLACEMENT — Administration, Third Floor NOTICE OF RIGHT TO PRIVACY Telephone (412) 434-6644/6645/6646/6647 Under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act access to student records by non University personnel CASHIER—Payment of Tuition and Fees, Administration Building, Ground Floor is restricted unless granted by the student or dependency of the student is demonstrated by a parent or guardian Telephone
  • A Comparative Study of Commuter Patterns and Trends in Great Britain, Ireland and the Us

    A Comparative Study of Commuter Patterns and Trends in Great Britain, Ireland and the Us

    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMMUTER PATTERNS AND TRENDS IN GREAT BRITAIN, IRELAND AND THE US Ian N Williams Ian Williams Services and Cambridge University 1 INTRODUCTION There are a number of reasons why we need to understand better the forces that shape commuter travel. It continues to be a major user of road and rail capacity in congested peak periods so that forecasting the future pattern of commuter trips is a critical task for most urban passenger models. Commuter travel by car has also been a substantial contributor to the past growth in greenhouse gas emissions so that its future growth trajectory is important to the environment. The quality of the transport facilities that connect homes to workplaces affect the land use policy options available to planners and influence the longer term success of planning policy decisions on residential and business construction location decisions. Patterns of commuting have changed through time but these changes do not always follow simple linear trends. In many countries the long-run trend of increases in commuting trip lengths of the 20th century had eased by the last decade. We need to understand the extent to which this is a result of changes in the underlying patterns of the behaviour of workers within the socio-economic environment they inhabit and the extent to which it is simply a reflection of changes in the transport supply characteristics such as cost and time of travel that are standard inputs to our transport models. The reason for initiating the comparative study presented in this paper was to examine those aspects of commuter patterns that have been shown to be similar across a range of countries and a range of years.
  • What Is a Lighting Director?

    What Is a Lighting Director?

    What is a lighting director by Martin Kempton What is a lighting director? Simply put - a lighting director designs the lighting for multi-camera television productions. He or she instructs the crew of electricians in their work in addition to guiding the team of operators who usually sit with the LD in the lighting control room. All this while working closely with the director and the rest of the production team to deliver the best possible pictures. However, there's rather more to it than that, and on this page on the website I explain where LDs work, what kinds of shows LDs work on and give some of the background to what we do. It's important to point out right away that simple 'illumination' is actually a relatively unimportant part of our work. Current TV cameras are capable of operating in very low light levels so it would be quite possible to see what was going on in most studios simply by switching on the houselights. Fortunately, producers and directors realise that the result would look pretty awful. Another thing is also worth making clear – a lighting director is not an electrician. He or she might have been once, but an LD is not another name for a crew chief or gaffer. Most television LDs do not have electrical qualifications, although some may have. In any case, this is not a requirement of the job. The electrical supervisor (gaffer) is in charge of realising the LD’s design in the studio from the rigging and electrical point of view.
  • Sfcta Summary

    Sfcta Summary

    SFCTA Regional Transportation Model Summary San Francisco County Transportation Authority Transportation Modeling System Overview and Summary Introduction One of the first tour-based micro-simulation models that is being used extensively in planning is the model system created by Cambridge Systematics and Parsons Brinckerhoff for the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, completed in 2000. The model system was designed to use the “full day pattern” modeling approach, first introduced by Bowman and Ben-Akiva at MIT (1). The main feature of the “full day pattern” approach is that it simultaneously predicts the main components of all of a person’s travel across the day. The concept of the tour is used to represent travel. A tour is a sequence of trips that begin and end either at home (Home-Based Tour) or work (Work-Based Sub-Tour). A synthesized population of San Francisco residents is input to the component models of vehicle availability, day pattern choice (tour generation), tour time of day choice, destination choice and mode choice. Destination and mode choice are predicted at both the tour and the trip level. The synthesized tours and trips are aggregated to represent flows between traffic analysis zones before traffic assignment. The model system predicts the choices for a full, representative sample of residents of San Francisco County, almost 800,000 simulated individual person-days of travel. In the San Francisco Model, a micro-simulation framework is applied to individuals and households making vehicle ownership, trip pattern, and trip destination and mode choices; many of these models are logit formulations. A Monte Carlo method is used select outcomes according to these logit model probabilities based on random number draws.
  • Independent Television Producers in England

    Independent Television Producers in England

    Negotiating Dependence: Independent Television Producers in England Karl Rawstrone A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the West of England, Bristol for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Creative Industries, University of the West of England, Bristol November 2020 77,900 words. Abstract The thesis analyses the independent television production sector focusing on the role of the producer. At its centre are four in-depth case studies which investigate the practices and contexts of the independent television producer in four different production cultures. The sample consists of a small self-owned company, a medium- sized family-owned company, a broadcaster-owned company and an independent- corporate partnership. The thesis contextualises these case studies through a history of four critical conjunctures in which the concept of ‘independence’ was debated and shifted in meaning, allowing the term to be operationalised to different ends. It gives particular attention to the birth of Channel 4 in 1982 and the subsequent rapid growth of an independent ‘sector’. Throughout, the thesis explores the tensions between the political, economic and social aims of independent television production and how these impact on the role of the producer. The thesis employs an empirical methodology to investigate the independent television producer’s role. It uses qualitative data, principally original interviews with both employers and employees in the four companies, to provide a nuanced and detailed analysis of the complexities of the producer’s role. Rather than independence, the thesis uses network analysis to argue that a television producer’s role is characterised by sets of negotiated dependencies, through which professional agency is exercised and professional identity constructed and performed.
  • CAST BIOS TOM RILEY (Leonardo Da Vinci) Tom Has Been Seen in A

    CAST BIOS TOM RILEY (Leonardo Da Vinci) Tom Has Been Seen in A

    CAST BIOS TOM RILEY (Leonardo da Vinci) Tom has been seen in a variety of TV roles, recently portraying Dr. Laurence Shepherd opposite James Nesbitt and Sarah Parish in ITV1’s critically acclaimed six-part medical drama series “Monroe.” Tom has completed filming the highly anticipated second season which premiered autumn 2012. In 2010, Tom played the role of Gavin Sorensen in the ITV thriller “Bouquet of Barbed Wire,” and was also cast in the role of Mr. Wickham in the ITV four-part series “Lost in Austen,” alongside Hugh Bonneville and Gemma Arterton. Other television appearances include his roles in Agatha Christie’s “Poirot: Appointment with Death” as Raymond Boynton, as Philip Horton in “Inspector Lewis: And the Moonbeams Kiss the Sea” and as Dr. James Walton in an episode of the BBC series “Casualty 1906,” a role that he later reprised in “Casualty 1907.” Among his film credits, Tom played the leading roles of Freddie Butler in the Irish film Happy Ever Afters, and the role of Joe Clarke in Stephen Surjik’s British Comedy, I Want Candy. Tom has also been seen as Romeo in St Trinian’s 2: The Legend of Fritton’s Gold alongside Colin Firth and Rupert Everett and as the lead role in Santiago Amigorena’s A Few Days in September. Tom’s significant theater experiences originate from numerous productions at the Royal Court Theatre, including “Paradise Regained,” “The Vertical Hour,” “Posh,” “Censorship,” “Victory,” “The Entertainer” and “The Woman Before.” Tom has also appeared on stage in the Donmar Warehouse theatre’s production of “A House Not Meant to Stand” and in the Riverside Studios’ 2010 production of “Hurts Given and Received” by Howard Barker, for which Tom received outstanding reviews and a nomination for best performance in the new Off West End Theatre Awards.
  • Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution

    Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution

    From Live-to-Digital Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution October 2016 by AEA Consulting for Arts Council England, UK Theatre and Society of London Theatre FROM LIVE-TO-DIGITAL aeaconsulting.com 2 Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution Arts Council England (ACE) champions, develops and Report invests in artistic and cultural experiences that enrich people’s lives. The organisation supports activities Commissioners across the arts, museums and libraries – from theatre and Funders to digital art, reading to dance, music to literature, and crafts to collections. Between 2015 and 2018, ACE plans to invest £1.1 billion of public money from government and an estimated £700 million from the National Lottery to help create art and culture experiences for everyone, everywhere. UK Theatre is the UK’s leading theatre and performing arts membership organisation. The organisation promotes excellence, professional development, and campaign to improve resilience and increase audiences across the sector. UK Theatre supports organisations and individuals in the performing arts at any stage of their career, through a range of training, events and other professional services. Whether it’s through sharing knowledge, bringing you together with the right people or providing practical advice, UK Theatre supports you and your work Society of London Theatre (SOLT) is an organisation that works with and on behalf of its Members to champion theatre and the performing arts. SOLT delivers a range of services both to assist members and to promote theatregoing to the widest possible audience. FROM LIVE-TO-DIGITAL aeaconsulting.com 3 Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution The study team for this report comprised Brent Karpf Reidy, Senior Consultant; About the Becky Schutt, Senior Associate; Deborah Abramson, Associate; and Antoni Durski, Research Analyst of AEA Consulting.
  • Guide for Travel Model Transfer

    Guide for Travel Model Transfer

    Guide for Travel Model Transfer Date: October 2014 FHWA-HEP-15-006 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HEP- 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Guide for Travel Model Transfer October 2014 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report Thomas F. Rossi, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. No. Chandra R, Bhat, University of Texas, Austin 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, MA 02140 11. Contract or Grant No. DTFH61-13-P-00162 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period United States Department of Transportation Covered Federal Highway Administration 8/29/2013 to 10/31/2014 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 HEPP-30 15. Supplementary Notes The project was managed by Sarah Sun, COR for Federal Highway Administration The report was reviewed by Raw, Jeremy (FHWA); Pihl, Eric (FHWA); Yoder, Supin (FHWA); Murakami, Elaine (FHWA); Gardner, Brian (FHWA) and Cervenka, Kenneth (FTA) 16. Abstract Travel demand models are important tools used in transportation planning to forecast the amount of travel expected to occur under various scenarios and to estimate the effects of changes in transportation supply or policies. The mathematical relationships in these models depend on parameters that reflect the sensitivity of travelers’ choices to the model’s input variables. The process of model transfer from one region to another has become commonplace as a way to obtain model parameter estimated when sufficient local data for model estimation.
  • FHWA/TX-10/0-6210-2 Accession No

    FHWA/TX-10/0-6210-2 Accession No

    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-10/0-6210-2 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Tour-Based Model Development for TxDOT: Evaluation and October 30, 2009 Transition Steps 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Ipek N. Sener, Nazneen Ferdous, Chandra R. Bhat, Phillip 0-6210-2 Reeder 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-6210 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 Texas Transportation Institute Texas A&M University System 3135 TAMU College Station, Texas 77843-3135 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office 9/1/08-8/31/09 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), in conjunction with the metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) under its purview, oversees the travel demand model development and implementation for most of the urban areas in Texas. In these urban areas, a package of computer programs labeled as the “Texas Travel Demand Package” or the “Texas Package” is used as the decision making tool to forecast travel demand and support regional planning, project evaluation, and policy analysis efforts. The Texas Package currently adopts the widely used four-step trip-based urban travel demand modeling process, which was developed in the 1960s when the focus of transportation planning was to meet long-term mobility needs through the provision of additional transportation infrastructure supply.
  • 3 Model Structure

    3 Model Structure

    User Guide and Model Documentation for SACSIM19 – June 2020 3 Model Structure This chapter will expand upon the model concepts and parameters from Chapter 2 and describes the theory and relationships between submodels of SACSIM. The overall SACSIM model system is illustrated in Figure 3-1 below. Each submodel captures a component of travel behavior. The key submodels are: 3.1 DAYSIM – Person Day Activity-Based Tour Simulation Model 3.2 Commercial vehicle travel 3.3 External travel 3.4 Airport passenger ground access 3.5 Vehicle trip table preparation and assignment 3.6 Transit path building and assignment 3-1 User Guide and Model Documentation for SACSIM19 – June 2020 Figure 3-1 SACSIM Model Structure 3-2 User Guide and Model Documentation for SACSIM19 – June 2020 DAYSIM - Person Day Activity-Based Tour Simulation DAYSIM is a regional activity-based, tour (ABT) simulator for the intra-regional travel of the region’s residents only. Around the country, ABT models are increasingly used as replacements for more conventional, four-step trip models. ABT models seek to represent a person’s travel as it actually occurs: in a series of trips connecting activities which a traveler needs or wants to participate in during the course of a day. This chapter gives high level introductions about DAYSIM. Please refer to Appendix A – DAYSIM Reference Guide for details. 3.1.1 DAYSIM Terminology and Concepts The specific definitions of activities and tours as used in this documentation are as follows: Activities are the things that people do during the course of the day, either to meet basic needs or for pleasure.