DOCSLIB.ORG

Mythological Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

350 MYTHOLOGICAL STUDIES MYTHOLOGICAL STUDIES. I.—THE THKEE DAUGHTERS OF CEOROPS. ANY oiie who investigates the mythology of Athens is confronted first and foremost by the figures of Cecrops and his daughters, Pandrosos, Herse, and Aglauros. Such shadowy personalities as Porphyrion, Kolanios, &c, are obvious interpolations from other local cults, and as such qua, Athens may be disregarded. In visiting the outlying denies Pausanias was told of other kings (P. i. 31, 5) who preceded Cecrops. Well and good for the demes, jealous of their local heroes and anxious to interpolate their names in the genealogical table of the pre-eminent Athens; but for Athens herself, and for the Athenian Apollodorus (Bibl. iii. 13, 8), it is with Cecrops the autoch- thon that the real live mythology of Athens begins—he is a person in art as well as in literary tradition. Above all, for our present purpose he has three famous daughters, whose personalities and activity are considerably more vital than that of their father. In dealing with Athenian local cults (Mythology and Monuments of Ancient Athens, p. xxxiii.), and especially on examining the ceremony of the Hersephoria, I was constantly haunted by the conviction that behind the personalities of these three sisters more was hidden than came to light on the surface. Father and daughters alike seemed to me too personal—if I may be allowed a seeming contradiction—to be mere impersonations. Cecrops we are usually told is the eponymous of the Cecropidae; his three daughters some mythologists hold are impersonations of the dew, a view I hope I have shown is unsatisfactory, if not untenable (op. cit. p. xxxiv.), or else they were incarnations of certain attributes and aspects of Athene, bearing to her much the same relation as Erectheus to Poseidon. If so, these incarnations are very vivacious, and their activity is strangely independent and even adverse to that of the goddess herself. Such solutions somehow fail to carry conviction. The subject has been so long and so ably investigated that it is with considerable deference I offer for criticism a solution I believe to be wholly novel. The conviction has slowly grown up in my mind that, in seeking for the significance of a mythological figure, the only fruitful method is to examine the cultus. Rites and ceremonies are the facts, and are of amazing perman- ence ; myths are the professed explanation of these facts, and shift and vary MYTHOLOGICAL STUDIES. 351 with the mental development of generations of worshippers. I proceed, then, to examine the cults of the three sisters, reserving for the present the cult of the father Cecrops. At the outset one fact strikes us. Aglauros and Pandrosos had regular shrines and precincts known in historical times, Aglauros on the N. slope of the Acropolis (P. i. 18, 2) and Pandrosos to the west of the Erectheion (P. i. 26, 6)—shrines, it should be noticed in passing, quite distinct and apart: that of Pandrosos more intimately connected with the Athene and Erectheus cults on the Acropolis. Of a shrine, precinct, sanctuary of Herse, no mention is made. Ovid {Met. ii. 739), probably feeling the difficulty, places Herse in a middle chamber between Aglauros and Pandrosos. Herse, then, has no recorded shrine. Has she a cult ? At first the answer seems obvious: she has the all-important ceremony of the Hersephoria, to which she gave her name. A glance at facts, however, shows that this is not the case. We can have no better authority than inscriptions, which deal with actual ritual statements and records, not with the often merely poetical fancies of literature. Three inscriptions deal with the Hersephoria as follows : G.I.A. iii. 887, . [TTJV kavr&>v\ dvyarepa Na[y\cn<TTpdTr)v e^pprjcfyopi]- aatrav 'Adrjva] HoXidSi ical Hav8p6cr[q) avedrjicav ejiri leprja<; KaXX(.<rT[o£)?]. G.I.A. iii. 318, 'Ep<rr)<f>6poK; /3. Et'X«#u<;'a[?] iv *Aypais. G.I.A. iii. 319, 'Qp<rr)<l>6poi<; /3. [1% ©e/«So?]. One thing is clear: Herse was not the object (so far as the evidence of inscriptions goes) of the Hersephoria. The only sister mentioned, i.e. if Kochler's restoration of G.I.A. iii. 887 be correct, is Pandrosos; her con- nection with Athene, &c, Themis, and Eileithyia, will be noted later. Against the evidence of inscriptions such literary statements as that of Istros (Schol. Aristoph. Lys. 643), TJ) yap "JLparrj iro^irevovcn TJI Ke/cpoTros OvyaTpl, weigh light on the scale; the yap betrays the prejudice of the etymologist. Moreover, to put one literary passage against another, Athenagoras {Leg. c. 1) says, 'AypavXa 'AQ-qvalot ical Te\eTa<; ical fivo-Trjpia dyovai ical HavBpoaqy, where, as the Hersephoria was a typical mystery, the omission of Herse is at least significant. I take it, then, that Herse is a mere etymological eponymous of the festival Hersephoria—a senseless double of Pandrosos put in to make up the sisters to the convenient canonical three of the * Charites; as such, for mythological purposes, she falls out of our investigation. It is worth noting that the Athenian women seem to have held her useless to swear by, another note of unsubstantial personality—Kara yap T»)? ' AypavXov m/ivvov KCLTO, Be Trj<; JlavSpocrov airdvtcoTepov {Schol. Aristoph. Them,. 533). We are left, then, with Pandrosos and Aglauros. These can certainly not be resolved into equivalents; their shrines, their cults, their characters, are all alike diverse, even antagonistic. Take Pandrosos first, and first her cult. The inscription quoted leaves, if it be correctly restored, no doubt that the Hersephnria was in her honour; further, though Pausanias does not distinctly state that there was any connection, he describes the ceremonial of the Hersephoria immediately after his mention (i. 27, 2) of the Pandroseion. 352 MYTHOLOGICAL STUDIES. What we know of the Hersephoria can, as I have shown elsewhere {Mythology and Monuments of Ancient Athens, pp. xxxiii. and 102), be supplemented by our knowledge of the analogous Thesmophoria. The scholiast on Lucian {Dial. Meretr. 211), and Clement of Alexandria in the Protrepticus (14, 15 P), both distinctly state that the ceremonies of the Thesmophoria, Arretophoria {i.e. Hersephoria) and the (obscure) Skirophoria were substantially the same, and the clue to the meaning of all three is in the words of the scholiast: Kal ayerai, TOV avrbv Xoyov k'^ovaa irepl rr}<; rS>v Kapnr&iv yevecrea><; Kal T»)? TS)V avdpdnrwv crTropa?. My object for the present is not to elucidate the festival, which has indeed, with abunda.nt analogies from the rites of primitive peoples of all parts of the world, been fully expounded by Mr. J. G. Frazer in his Golden Bough, vol. ii. 44-48, but rather to show how the analogy of these festivals lets out the secret of the nature and significance of Pandrosos. Setting aside the Skirophoria, we know that the Thesmophoria was a primi- tive rite carried on by women in honour of the Earth-goddess both at Athens and Megara, and probably at many other places. I say advisedly of the Earth- goddess, because, though it was associated later with the names of Denieter and Persephone, it probably preceded the formation of their myth. The women of Athena accounted among their various conservative excellences that ' they kept the Thesmophoria as they always used to do' (Aristoph. Eccl. 223). The meaning of the 'Epo-^opot? /3. Trjs ®e/wSo? thus becomes clear. Pandrosos, goddess of all young things, is none other than a form of Ge Themis, who is but the earlier aspect of Demeter Thesinophoros. Ge had, we know, not only a statue on the Acropolis (P. i. 24, 3) as Karpophoros, but also a sanctuary as Kourotrophos just at the entrance to the Acropolis gates (P. i. 22, 3), €<TTI Be Kal Fij? K.ovporpocf>ov Kal Ar]firjTpo<; tepbv XXOJJ? ; the goddesses, so near akin—in fact the one but the later form of the other—seem to have had a sanctuary in common. The foundation was of great antiquity, and attributed to Erichthonios. Suidas, sub voc. Kourotrophos, says : Kovporpo^xx; Yrj. ravTrj Be Qvaai <f>aal TO irpoiTov 'Epv^doviov iv 'A/cpoiroXei' Kal {3co/ibv IBpiitracrOai l)(api>v airoBiBovTa rfj Tjj TWV rpofeiwv K.T.X. Pandrosos, as (according to Apollodorus and Paiisanias) faithful keeper of the chest, gains a new significance seen to be one and the same with the actual Earth-mother Ge. She could not violate her own trust—she who was essentially Kouro- trophos. Themis is substantially Earth, earth when cultivated and owned by ordered men, a somewhat later conception than the primitive earth the mother. We observe the same sequence in the precedence of the oracle at Delphi— 7rp(orov /lev ev%y Tf}Be Trpeafievw ffecov TTJV TrpforofiavTiv Yalav i/c Be T?)? &efiiv. Aesch. Hum. 1, 2, where Themis is clearly but the later form of Gaia. We know from Clement of Alexandria that the imopp^Ta rr)<; ®e/u.iBot were of the same significance as those of the Thesmophoria {Protrcp. 86). The 'Epo-rjcfropot*; /3. ElXeidvias iv "Ay/jew? has a less obvious connection; but in the old primitive days, MYTHOLOGICAL STUDIES. 353 when every god was a god of all work, that Pandrosos-Ge-Kourotrophos- Karpophoros should also be Eileithyia would present no difficulties. I fancy that the Eileithyia, so consistently present at the birth of Athene, was no mere late impersonation, but this early Earth-goddess. The figure of Ge-Pandrosos-Themis was bit by bit effaced by the more splendid personality of her later double Demeter.
Recommended publications
  • The Higher Aspects of Greek Religion. Lectures Delivered at Oxford and In

    The Higher Aspects of Greek Religion. Lectures Delivered at Oxford and In

    BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIET OF Henirg m. Sage 1891 .A^^^ffM3. islm^lix.. 5931 CornelJ University Library BL 25.H621911 The higher aspects of Greek religion.Lec 3 1924 007 845 450 The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924007845450 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES 1911 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES THE HIGHER ASPECTS OF GREEK RELIGION LECTURES DELIVERED AT OXFORD AND IN LONDON IN APRIL AND MAY igii BY L. R. FARNELL, D.Litt. WILDE LECTURER IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD LONDON WILLIAMS AND NORGATE GARDEN, W.C. 14 HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT 1912 CONTENTS Lecture I GENERAL FEATURES AND ORIGINS OF GREEK RELIGION Greek religion mainly a social-political system, 1. In its earliest " period a " theistic creed, that is^ a worship of personal individual deities, ethical personalities rather than mere nature forces, 2. Anthrqgomorphism its predominant bias, 2-3. Yet preserving many primitive features of " animism " or " animatism," 3-5. Its progress gradual without violent break with its distant past, 5-6. The ele- ment of magic fused with the religion but not predominant, 6-7. Hellenism and Hellenic religion a blend of two ethnic strains, one North-Aryan, the other Mediterranean, mainly Minoan-Mycenaean, 7-9. Criteria by which we can distinguish the various influences of these two, 9-1 6. The value of Homeric evidence, 18-20. Sum- mary of results, 21-24. Lecture II THE RELIGIOUS BOND AND MORALITY OF THE FAMILY The earliest type of family in Hellenic society patrilinear, 25-27.
  • The Odd Thesmophoria of Aristophanes' Thesmophoriazusae Habash, Martha Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1997; 38, 1; Proquest Pg

    The Odd Thesmophoria of Aristophanes' Thesmophoriazusae Habash, Martha Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1997; 38, 1; Proquest Pg

    The odd Thesmophoria of Aristophanes' Thesmophoriazusae Habash, Martha Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1997; 38, 1; ProQuest pg. 19 The Odd Thesmophoria of Aristophanes' Thesmophoriaz usae Martha Habash EXPECTED FROM THE TITLE, Aristophanes' Thesmophoria­ zusae does in fact concern the Thesmophoria, that A:. annual, secret women's festival of Demeter and Kore held thoughout the Greek world. From line 277 the play is set at a Thesmophoria, but a very odd Thesmophoria, in which the poet demonstrates his bold, inventive, and creative genius at work in reshaping this 'festival'.1 Aristophanes employs suf­ ficient elements of the real Thesmophoria to make the pro­ ceedings recognizable, but he also adds as major components several non-Thesmophoric elements, introduced in part for sheer comic effect, and in part, I shall argue, to shape his Thes­ mophoria and his play into a form more arpropriate to the civic and religious purposes and atmosphere 0 the festival in which it was presented, the City Dionysia.2 I For studies of the poet's presentation of genuine Thesmophoric elements and themes, see H. Hansen, U Aristophanes' Thesmophoriazusae: Theme, Struc­ ture, and Production," Philologus 120 (1976) 165-85; A. Bowie, Aristophanes: Myth, Ritual and Comedy (Cambridge 1993); the role of mimesis in this play: F. Zeitlin, uTravesties of Gender and Genre in Aristophanes' Thesmo­ phoriazousae, " in H. Foley, ed., Reflections of Women in Antiquity (New York 1981) 169-217; M. DETIENNE, MThe Violence of Wellborn Ladies: Women in the Thesmophoria," in M. Detienne and J.-P. Vernant. edd., The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the Greeks, tr.
  • The Limits of Communication Between Mortals and Immortals in the Homeric Hymns

    The Limits of Communication Between Mortals and Immortals in the Homeric Hymns

    Body Language: The Limits of Communication between Mortals and Immortals in the Homeric Hymns. Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bridget Susan Buchholz, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Sarah Iles Johnston Fritz Graf Carolina López-Ruiz Copyright by Bridget Susan Buchholz 2009 Abstract This project explores issues of communication as represented in the Homeric Hymns. Drawing on a cognitive model, which provides certain parameters and expectations for the representations of the gods, in particular, for the physical representations their bodies, I examine the anthropomorphic representation of the gods. I show how the narratives of the Homeric Hymns represent communication as based upon false assumptions between the mortals and immortals about the body. I argue that two methods are used to create and maintain the commonality between mortal bodies and immortal bodies; the allocation of skills among many gods and the transference of displays of power to tools used by the gods. However, despite these techniques, the texts represent communication based upon assumptions about the body as unsuccessful. Next, I analyze the instances in which the assumed body of the god is recognized by mortals, within a narrative. This recognition is not based upon physical attributes, but upon the spoken self identification by the god. Finally, I demonstrate how successful communication occurs, within the text, after the god has been recognized. Successful communication is represented as occurring in the presence of ritual references.
  • Few Problems in Herodotus Have Attracted More Scholarly Attention Than the Religious Attidudes He Expresses in Book 2

    Few Problems in Herodotus Have Attracted More Scholarly Attention Than the Religious Attidudes He Expresses in Book 2

    Herodotus, Dionysus, and the Greek death taboo. The Homeric Hymn to Demeter and the construction of the “chthonic” in Greek literary tradition. Herodotus’ explicit avoidance of the mentioning of divine names and matters in the second book of the Histories counts in most cases as instances of the Greek taboo concerning the relation of gods to the impurity of death, which the Egyptian death cult of Osiris transgresses in an obvious manner. In 2.171.2–3, Herodotus’ reticence may have concerned Persephone, whose name was taboo for the same reasons. The Homeric Hymn to Demeter, the Theogony, the Eumenides, and other works featuring underwordly deities, construed the Chthonian category of the divine as an attempt to justify and explain the nature of these ancient agricultural gods and rituals in a manner acceptable to the aristocratic religious tendency, which had come to regard death as impure: a tendency which justifiably may be called Olympian and traced its ideological origins back to the Homeric epos.1 One of many contentious problems in Herodotus concerns the religious attitudes expressed, purportedly as his own, in the second book of the Histories, in particular those attitudes which indicate a taboo in operation. On a number of occasions, Herodotus claims that it is forbidden or sacrilegious for him to mention something, usually the name of a god. A couple of times he states that the mention of something of a religious character would be unpleasant or improper. There are also some passages which have been taken as implicit expressions of the same or a similar attitude.
  • The Festival Proerosia Robertson, Noel Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1996; 37, 4; Proquest Pg

    The Festival Proerosia Robertson, Noel Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1996; 37, 4; Proquest Pg

    New Light on Demeter's Mysteries: The Festival Proerosia Robertson, Noel Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1996; 37, 4; ProQuest pg. 319 New Light on Demeter's Mysteries: The Festival Proerosia Noel Robertson EMETER'S "MYSTERIES: festivals conducted mainly by women and in sanctuaries that were suitably withdrawn, D were almost universal in Greek cities, like the cereal agri­ culture they were intended to promote. They were integral to Greek society and are now widely and profitably studied as a social phenomenon. If the general custom is important, so are the many ritual actions that constitute a given festival, through which (according to one's point of view) the women either worship the goddess Demeter, or work directly on the earth, or affirm their sense of the fitness of things. Animal sacrifice plays a large part, as usual, the pig species being favored by De­ meter, and there is a peculiar practice of throwing piglets into a pit, which is then closed. It is a disadvantage that reconstructions of ritual must be sought in older handbooks and special studies. The basic work on Greek festivals was done long ago, and new evidence, though not wholly neglected, has not led to any sustained effort of revision. The festival Proerosia, "Before-ploughing (rites)," is such a case. The Athenian, or Eleusinian, version of this festival once seemed to stand alone, as if it were something secondary and contrived, without much bearing on the larger pattern of Demeter's worship. We can now see that the Proerosia was widespread. It may have been as common as the greatest of Demeter's festivals, the Thesmophoria: it was a sequel to it, coming later in the autumn season.
  • Demeter and Persephone As Temenos: a Perspective of Understanding Postpartum Depression

    Demeter and Persephone As Temenos: a Perspective of Understanding Postpartum Depression

    Mythological Studies Journal 5 (2014) / 31-38 Demeter and Persephone as Temenos: A Perspective of Understanding Postpartum Depression Stephanie Zajchowski Abstract Bringing life into the world is an awe inspiring endeavor. Few walk away from the experience unchanged. Yet, the transformation of the feminine body mirrors the transformation of the feminine psyche, what occurs physically also occurs instinctually. One does not develop without affecting the other. Often these ripples of change can tear open the psyche causing a loss of self that is labeled as postpartum depression, anxiety, or depression. This article explores a postpartum loss of self and the personal experience of postpartum depression through the myth of Demeter and Persephone. There is an unaided search for meaning in motherhood that is explored in this article through myth. It aims to pursue a deeper understanding of women through a conversation of the feminine soul. Keywords Demeter, Persephone, postpartum depression, motherhood, women’s studies, mothers groups “Once you shave your legs, you can not go back.” Wise words spoken from a knowing mother watching her daughter “lingering on the borders of Hades [...]” (Jung and Kerényi 108). Many events in life hold this truth - the death of a loved one, the submission of our body to the pleasure of another, the birth of a child. Events such as these alter us. And though the decision to descend is sometimes our own, the descent never feels completely willing. “The ego still yearns for the status quo, but further down the price has been paid, and we can’t go back” (Luke 195).
  • [PDF]The Myths and Legends of Ancient Greece and Rome

    [PDF]The Myths and Legends of Ancient Greece and Rome

    The Myths & Legends of Ancient Greece and Rome E. M. Berens p q xMetaLibriy Copyright c 2009 MetaLibri Text in public domain. Some rights reserved. Please note that although the text of this ebook is in the public domain, this pdf edition is a copyrighted publication. Downloading of this book for private use and official government purposes is permitted and encouraged. Commercial use is protected by international copyright. Reprinting and electronic or other means of reproduction of this ebook or any part thereof requires the authorization of the publisher. Please cite as: Berens, E.M. The Myths and Legends of Ancient Greece and Rome. (Ed. S.M.Soares). MetaLibri, October 13, 2009, v1.0p. MetaLibri http://metalibri.wikidot.com [email protected] Amsterdam October 13, 2009 Contents List of Figures .................................... viii Preface .......................................... xi Part I. — MYTHS Introduction ....................................... 2 FIRST DYNASTY — ORIGIN OF THE WORLD Uranus and G (Clus and Terra)........................ 5 SECOND DYNASTY Cronus (Saturn).................................... 8 Rhea (Ops)....................................... 11 Division of the World ................................ 12 Theories as to the Origin of Man ......................... 13 THIRD DYNASTY — OLYMPIAN DIVINITIES ZEUS (Jupiter).................................... 17 Hera (Juno)...................................... 27 Pallas-Athene (Minerva).............................. 32 Themis .......................................... 37 Hestia
  • An Online Textbook for Classical Mythology

    An Online Textbook for Classical Mythology

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Textbooks Open Texts 2017 Mythology Unbound: An Online Textbook for Classical Mythology Jessica Mellenthin Utah State University Susan O. Shapiro Utah State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/oer_textbooks Recommended Citation Mellenthin, Jessica and Shapiro, Susan O., "Mythology Unbound: An Online Textbook for Classical Mythology" (2017). Textbooks. 5. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/oer_textbooks/5 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Texts at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Textbooks by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mythology Unbound: An Online Textbook for Classical Mythology JESSICA MELLENTHIN AND SUSAN O. SHAPIRO Mythology Unbound by Susan Shapiro is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 Contents Map vii Aegis 1 Agamemnon and Iphigenia 5 Aphrodite 9 Apollo 15 Ares 25 The Argonauts 31 Artemis 41 Athena 49 Caduceus 61 Centaurs 63 Chthonian Deities 65 The Delphic Oracle 67 Demeter 77 Dionysus/Bacchus 85 Hades 97 Hephaestus 101 Hera 105 Heracles 111 Hermes 121 Hestia 133 Historical Myths 135 The Iliad - An Introduction 137 Jason 151 Miasma 155 The Minotaur 157 The Odyssey - An Introduction 159 The Oresteia - An Introduction 169 Origins 173 Orpheus 183 Persephone 187 Perseus 193 Poseidon 205 Prometheus 213 Psychological Myths 217 Sphinx 219 Story Pattern of the Greek Hero 225 Theseus 227 The Three Types of Myth 239 The Twelve Labors of Heracles 243 What is a myth? 257 Why are there so many versions of Greek 259 myths? Xenia 261 Zeus 263 Image Attributions 275 Map viii MAP Aegis The aegis was a goat skin (the name comes from the word for goat, αἴξ/aix) that was fringed with snakes and often had the head of Medusa fixed to it.
  • Artemis and Virginity in Ancient Greece

    Artemis and Virginity in Ancient Greece

    SAPIENZA UNIVERSITÀ DI ROMA FACOLTÀ DI LETTERE E FILOSOFIA DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN FILOLOGIA E STORIA DEL MONDO ANTICO XXVI CICLO ARTEMIS AND VIRGINITY IN ANCIENT GREECE TUTOR COTUTOR PROF. PIETRO VANNICELLI PROF. FRANCESCO GUIZZI 2 Dedication: To S & J with love and gratitude. Acknowledgements: I first and foremost wish to thank my tutor/advisor Professor Pietro Vannicelli and Co- Tutor Professor Francesco Guizzi for agreeing to serve in these capacities, for their invaluable advice and comments, and for their kind support and encouragement. I also wish to thank the following individuals who have lent intellectual and emotional support as well as provided invaluable comments on aspects of the thesis or offered advice and spirited discussion: Professor Maria Giovanna Biga, La Sapienza, and Professor Gilda Bartoloni, La Sapienza, for their invaluable support at crucial moments in my doctoral studies. Professor Emerita Larissa Bonfante, New York University, who proof-read my thesis as well as offered sound advice and thought-provoking and stimulating discussions. Dr. Massimo Blasi, La Sapienza, who proof-read my thesis and offered advice as well as practical support and encouragement throughout my doctoral studies. Dr. Yang Wang, Princeton University, who proof-read my thesis and offered many helpful comments and practical support. Dr. Natalia Manzano Davidovich, La Sapienza, who has offered intellectual, emotional, and practical support this past year. Our e-mail conversations about various topics related to our respective theses have
  • Childbirth and Infancy in Greek and Roman Antiquity

    Childbirth and Infancy in Greek and Roman Antiquity

    CHAPTER 18 Childbirth and Infancy in Greek and Roman Antiquity Véronique Dasen 1 Introduction Long believed to be a transitional time that left no trace, birth and early childhood have recently emerged as a new field of research. Interdisciplinary approaches have demonstrated that coming into life has a complex and rich history of its own in clas- sical antiquity, involving important issues relating to the history of medicine, religion, family and gender studies. New impulses also came from the results obtained for other periods and societies, allowing useful transfers of questioning on various topics, from the function of babies’ “molding” to fosterage relations. In this chapter we will ana- lyze a series of key themes in a comparative way, highlighting similarities and specifici- ties, in search of the many-folded perception of young children in Greek and Roman antiquity. The extent of comparison is uneven because of the lacunary and changing nature of evidence in each culture. Textual sources relating to that first stage of life are limited: infants were mainly in the hands of women, who left almost no direct written evidence. We will also concentrate on freeborn and mostly elite children, as nothing or very little is known about lower-class ones and those born in slavery. Traces of children in material culture (feeding bottles, amulets, toys, etc.) partly compensate the paucity of literary sources, but the interpretation of objects from various contexts (funerary, votive, domestic, etc.) is often still a matter of debate. 2 Infancy: Definitions Growing up in antiquity was not perceived as a continuum: the process was composed of stages associated with the gradual integration into the community, often marked by A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds, edited by Beryl Rawson ©2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 99781405187671_4_018.indd781405187671_4_018.indd 229191 110/9/20100/9/2010 44:08:08:08:08 PPMM 292 Véronique Dasen ritual acts.
  • Greek Devotional Images: Iconography and Interpretation in the Religious Arts

    Greek Devotional Images: Iconography and Interpretation in the Religious Arts

    Greek Devotional Images: Iconography and Interpretation in the Religious Arts DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Katherine A. Rask Graduate Program in History of Art The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Mark D. Fullerton, Adviser Timothy J. McNiven Sarah Iles Johnston Hugh B. Urban Copyright by Katherine A. Rask 2012 Abstract This dissertation concerns the uses of iconography, visual culture, and material culture in the study of Greek religion. I draw on methods and theoretical frameworks from outside the discipline in order contextualize the study of images and symbols in larger discourses and to introduce the most recent developments in scholarship. To better understand the religious aspects of Greek experience, this dissertation presents a mixture of intellectual history, historiography, and methodological critique. I provide an interdisciplinary overview of symbol theory and approaches to signs, the deep-seated interweaving of theological and artistic concerns in occultist traditions and 19th century scholarship, and iconographic methodologies employed by Classical studies and archaeology. Several themes repeatedly appear throughout the discussion, including the theoretical relationships between material culture and religion and the perceived dichotomy between phenomenological responses and interpretation. By exploring these topics, it becomes clear that approaches to religion in ancient Greece need to be adapted to better account for visual and material culture. Despite most emphasis on public, ritual-centered aspects, images and objects attest to private encounters with divinities. Based on comparative analysis, I argue that the religious experience of ancient Greeks exhibits many elements of devotionalism, a religious phenomenon developed by Robert Orsi.

  • Sin in the Greek Cults

    SIN IN THE GREEK CULTS. BY EDWIN A. RUM BALL. IT has been customary for many ages now to think of the Hellenic mind as possessing more healthy joy fulness and less conscious- ness of the dark side of life than others. When Rawlinson wrote that "the typical Greek was devoid of any deep sense of sin," he expressed what most men have thought, who have read their litera- ture. Professor James, however, has come forward as an advocate against the lightsome joyous view of life possessed by the Greek. He writes, that "the moment the Greeks grew systematically pensive and thought of ultimates they became unmitigated pessimists." As examples he cites first of all the Iliad, XVH, 446: "Nothing then is more wretched anywhere than man of all that breathes and creeps on the earth." Also Theognis 425-428: "Best of all for all things upon earth is it not to be born nor to behold the splendors of the sun ; next best to traverse as soon as possible the gate of Hades. Other passages of like significance he quotes from Oidipus in Co- lonus, 1225, and also in another place, the words Achilles hears Lycaon, Priam's young son, say, beginning "Ah, friend, thou too must die." Probably the whole value of these words of James will be that in the future we shall not be so wildly enthusiastic over the bright worship of the Greek and the joyful optimism that characterized it. For we certainly shall do wrong if we blot out the beautiful picture of Apollo, for example, "the bright cheerful patron of song," and the procession of young boys carrying the olive branches singing of the "heartening wine that sends all care to sleep," and in its place put the "blackly pessimistic" picture of the Harvard Professor.