DOCSLIB.ORG

The Revolution Strikes Back a Special Report on Iran L July 21St 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Revolution Strikes Back a Special Report on Iran L July 21St 2007 The revolution strikes back A special report on Iran l July 21st 2007 Artist CREDIT if required Republication, copying or redistribution by any means is expressly prohibited without the prior written permission of The Economist The Economist July 21st 2007 A special report on Iran 1 The revolution strikes back Also in this section Men of principle Iran’s neoconservatives and their white coup. Page 3 Bombs away A suitable case for pre-emption? Page 6 The big squeeze But sanctions are not yet painful enough to change Iran’s nuclear policy. Page 8 Only engage The case for a grand bargain. Page 11 The verdict of Qom Theory and practice. Page 12 Khomeini’s children An uncompromising Iran and an uncomprehending America may be stumbling to war, says Peter David Not happy, but probably not eager to become Westernised either. Page 14 T IS Friday prayers in Tehran. Several to its present policy Iran will not have ne- Iblocks around the university and Pales- gotiations with it. Now, before the main tine and Revolution Squares have been sermon, comes the warm-up. A speaker closed to trac, as they are every week at denounces Islam’s foes. Shame on you Is- this time. Throughout the morning lines of rael, down with Israel, the seated throng soldiers in khaki and Revolutionary bellows in response, sts pumping in un- Guards in green have been ling into a vast ison. Death to America. hangar. Knots of civilians stroll up in the The prayer leader takes his place be- sun. From within, loudspeakers squawk hind a lectern. In one hand he holds a gun, sermons and bursts of martial music. to represent the sword of Islam. He then re- This week happens also to be the 25th cites in a tremulous voice the lamentation anniversary of the liberation of Khorram- for the Shias’ rst-century martyr, Imam shahr, a bloody Iranian victory during the Ali. At this the assembled worshippers cra- eight-year imposed war against Iraq. All dle their heads and sob, shoulders heaving week footage of the ghting has been with sudden grief. The preacher then takes broadcast on television, even lling the a sip of water, signalling that this morn- half-time gap in the European football cup ing’s main political messagewhich will nal between AC Milan and Liverpool be preached at similar meetings in all of (which soccer-mad Iranians watched Iran’s citiesis about to be delivered. avidly). The Iran-Iraq war cost Iran hun- Today’s theme is a forthcoming meet- dreds of thousands of lives, helping to con- ing in Baghdad between Iranian and Acknowledgments Besides those mentioned in the text, the author would like solidate the very revolution Saddam Hus- American diplomats, the rst formal direct to thank the following for their time, help and insights: Ak- sein had foolishly attacked. Posters of the contact after decades during which nei- bar Alami, Mohammad Atriafar, Patrick Clawson, Richard martyrs still adorn the streets of Tehran. ther country has been willing to talk to the Dalton, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, Mehran Ghassemi, Bijan Khajehpour, Afshin Molavi, Karim Sadjapour, Barbara Sla- Inside the hangar tens of thousands of other. The preacher is at pains to explain vin and Hamid-Reza Taraqqi. men (the women are screened out of sight) that Iran is not showing weakness. That sit in rows on prayer rugs. At the front un- carnivorous wolf is not of the type to enter A list of sources is at der a podium is much of the country’s tur- negotiations, he says of America. Amer- www.economist.com/specialreports baned political leadership. Also present is ica is only after securing its own hege- General Yahya Rahim Safavi, the com- mony. Isn’t America the axis of evil? mander of the Revolutionary Guards, Wasn’t refusing to talk to America a princi- An audio interview with the author is at which wrested control of the war from ple of the blessed Ayatollah Khomeini? www.economist.com/audio what had been left of the shah’s army and There will be no departing from principle, has exercised growing inuence in Iran he says. All that has happened is that Iraq’s A country brieng on Iran is at ever since. Under the podium a green ban- government has asked for help. And all www.economist.com/iran ner proclaims: So long as America sticks Iran will do is insist that as Iraq’s occupiers1 2 A special report on Iran The Economist July 21st 2007 2 the Americans are responsible for the CD on which they can look up who is dent Ahmadinejad would be more dan- mayhem there. We can with most cer- thought to be investing what in Iran. Why? gerous still. Would he consider using tacti- tainty announce today that the United Because, says Danielle Pletka, an AEI vice- cal nuclear weapons against Iran? You States has become the obvious manifesta- president, people need to understand that can’t rule out anything. John McCain re- tion of the axis of evil in the region, he de- between (a) doing nothing about Iran and cently broke into song, intoning bomb- claims. The seated throng roars its assent. (c) dropping a bomb on it is a third pos- bomb-bomb bomb-bomb Iran to the sibility, (b), of inicting economic pain un- tune of a Beach Boys song. The audience in America til the mullahs change their ways. This Alongside the work of the think-tanks Tehran’s Friday prayers are broadcast all week too Dick Cheney pipes up from the and the warnings and ditties of the politi- over Iran and around the world. The ery deck of USS John Stennis, one of the addi- cians comes a drumbeat of alarming slogans of the worshippers reinforce the tional aircraft carriers America has sent to newspaper articles. In the Wall Street Jour- scary fanaticism outsiders have come to the Persian Gulf. The vice-president says nal, Norman Podhoretz, a hero of the neo- associate with the Islamic Republic since America will stand with our friends to conservatives, concludes in an op-ed Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolution more stop Iran getting nuclear weapons and piece: The plain and brutal truth is that if than a quarter of a century ago. And no- dominating this region. Iran is to be prevented from developing a where in the world do Tehran’s morning Some say that Mr Cheney is the last nuclear arsenal, there is no alternative to prayers have a more attentive audience hawk standing in the Bush administration. the actual use of military forceany more than in the capital of the United States. But anxiety about Iran’s nuclear inten- than there was an alternative to force if For all its problems in Iraq, America is tions stretches right across American poli- Hitler was to be stopped in 1938. also xated on Iran. In 2005 George Bush tics. Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of promised that he would stop the world’s state, claims that America faces no greater The audience in Iran most dangerous men from getting their challenge from a single country than from Is that really where things stand with hands on the world’s most dangerous Iran. And most of the presidential candi- Irana new Hitler and a new 1938? Look weapons. That same year a brash former dates for 2008 are talking equally tough. again at Tehran’s Friday prayers. One thing mayor of Tehran, Mahmoud Ahmadine- Hillary Clinton favours opening a dip- a visitor notices at once is how little con- jad, won a surprise victory in Iran’s presi- lomatic track with Iran. John Edwards nection this stage-managed event has with dential elections. Since then he has done supports a non-aggression pact. Barack the everyday life of the bustling metropo- his level best to look like one of the world’s Obama says it would be a profound mis- lis around it. Even the audience, squatting most dangerous men. take to start a war. But neither Mrs Clinton in serried ranks beyond the dignitaries, President Ahmadinejad took over from nor Mr Edwards nor Mr Obama rules out looks untypical. a middle-aged cleric, Muhammad Kha- force if Iran persists with its nuclear plans. Iran is a young country (see chart): two tami. As president, the mild, bespectacled For Rudy Giuliani, the Republican out of three people are below the age of 30. Mr Khatami had pushed for liberal re- front-runner, a military strike would be On the streets of auent north Tehran, forms at home and talked reassuringly to very dangerous, but nuclear arms in the young people dress in the latest fashions the outside world about Iran’s desire for a control of an irrational person like Presi- even if the jeans-clad women are obliged dialogue of civilisations. The new presi- by law to wear the Islamic headscarf (the dent, a former Revolutionary Guard and a hijab). The audience at prayers, however, is Holocaust-denying demagogue, does not A young country 1 older: shabbily dressed men well into their do reassurance. Since his election Iran has Population, m 40s, regime stalwarts who have trekked deed the UN Security Council’s orders to uphill from the poor southern suburbs. 80 stop enriching uranium, threatened Which is the true Iranthe consumer- 70 repeatedly to make Israel disappear and oriented young, bored by the slogans of a 60 declared war on Iran’s internal reformists. long-ago revolution and impatient to 50 Switch to a typical week in Washing- move on? Or the regime faithful chorusing 40 ton, DC, just before those Friday prayers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CLASSROOM | 9-12 Lessons
    CLASSROOM | 9-12 Lessons : JIMMY CARTER AND THE IRANIAN HOSTAGE CRISIS President Carter announces sanctions against Iran in the White House Press Room. Jimmy Carter Library Jimmy Carter would say later, “No matter who was with me, we watched the big grandfather clock by the door.” Time was running out, for it was Tuesday, January 20, 1981. The scene was the Oval Office. In just hours this president would leave it for good, and a new leader, Ronald Reagan, would move in. As the clock ticked the time away, Carter tried to resolve a crisis that had almost destroyed his presidency. He was close, very close, and as he said, “At stake were the lives of 52 precious human beings who had been imprisoned in Iran for 444 days–and almost 12 billion dollars of Iranian assets.” 1 Prelude The beginnings of this crisis preceded Jimmy Carter’s term by almost thirty years. For that long, the United States had provided political support and, more recently, massive military assistance to the government of the shah of Iran. Iran was important because it provided oil to the industrial West and separated the Soviet Union from the Persian Gulf and the oil states. The United States had an enormous stake in keeping it stable and independent. By 1979, however, when Carter had been in office three years, the shah was in trouble, reaping the harvest of years of brutal and unpopular policies, including the use of secret police that controlled dissent with arbitrary arrests and torture.2 It was clear that the shah had lost the (next page) White House Historical Association | http://www.whha.org | Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Iranian Terror and Its Threat to the U.S. Homeland
    THE FUTURE OF IRANIAN TERROR AND ITS THREAT TO THE U.S. HOMELAND HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 11, 2016 Serial No. 114–53 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 21–525 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas, Chairman LAMAR SMITH, Texas BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi PETER T. KING, New York LORETTA SANCHEZ, California MIKE ROGERS, Alabama SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan, Vice Chair JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina BRIAN HIGGINS, New York TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana LOU BARLETTA, Pennsylvania WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania DONALD M. PAYNE, JR., New Jersey CURT CLAWSON, Florida FILEMON VELA, Texas JOHN KATKO, New York BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey WILL HURD, Texas KATHLEEN M. RICE, New York EARL L. ‘‘BUDDY’’ CARTER, Georgia NORMA J. TORRES, California MARK WALKER, North Carolina BARRY LOUDERMILK, Georgia MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas DANIEL M. DONOVAN, JR., New York BRENDAN P. SHIELDS, Staff Director JOAN V. O’HARA, General Counsel MICHAEL S. TWINCHEK, Chief Clerk I. LANIER AVANT, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE PETER T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iranian Constitution: an Exercise in Contradictions S
    The Fletcher School Online Journal for issues related to Southwest Asia and Islamic Civilization Spring 2004, Article 1 The Iranian Constitution: An Exercise in Contradictions S. Waqar Hasib A constitution is not merely a document, nor I. Introduction a set of laws. Rather, in many ways a constitution Since the overthrow of Shah Mohammed is an expression of the values, needs, and desires Reza Pahlevi in 1979, Iran can best be described as of a particular community. Thus it is important to a nation of contradictions. Iranians are often examine not only the actual content of a shown on U.S. television burning American flags constitution, but also the particular historical and chanting “death to America,” while behind context in which it was created. One could not the camera they listen to Madonna, wear Tommy properly study the U.S. constitution with out at Hilfiger jeans and watch the latest Los Angeles least a basic understanding of the history of the Lakers games on satellite dishes.1 Iran ranks at British Empire in North America, the American the top of the U.S. State Department’s list of Revolution, and the Articles of Confederation. nations that sponsor terrorism,2 yet Iranians lit Likewise, one cannot properly study the Iranian candles and held mass impromptu vigils in the constitution without first examining the chain of streets of Tehran for the victims of the September events that led to its creation. 11 attacks.3 Often a nation’s externally visible A. From the Qajars to Reza Khan – 1826 to 1941 characteristics are a result of its internal political The roots of the current Iranian constitution structures.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Policy and Military Strategy in the Middle East
    S. HRG. 114–350 UNITED STATES POLICY AND MILITARY STRATEGY IN THE MIDDLE EAST HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 24; SEPTEMBER 22; OCTOBER 27, 2015 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:53 Sep 08, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 C:\USERS\WR47328\DESKTOP\21401.TXT WILDA UNITED STATES POLICY AND MILITARY STRATEGY IN THE MIDDLE EAST VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:53 Sep 08, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 C:\USERS\WR47328\DESKTOP\21401.TXT WILDA S. HRG. 114–350 UNITED STATES POLICY AND MILITARY STRATEGY IN THE MIDDLE EAST HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 24; SEPTEMBER 22; OCTOBER 27, 2015 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 21–401 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:53 Sep 08, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\USERS\WR47328\DESKTOP\21401.TXT WILDA COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Chairman JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma JACK REED, Rhode Island JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama BILL NELSON, Florida ROGER F.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Ideological Expansion
    Iran’s Ideological Expansion “We shall export our revolution to the whole world. Until the cry ‘there is no god but God’ resounds over the whole world, there will be struggle.” – Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini June 2018 Table of Contents About the Author ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Profiles of Institutions Spreading Iran’s Revolution Abroad ...................................................................... 6 Universities .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Al-Mustafa International University ..................................................................................................... 6 Islamic Azad University ......................................................................................................................... 8 Charitable Organizations ..................................................................................................................... 10 Imam Khomeini Relief Committee ...................................................................................................... 11 Ahlul Bayt World Assembly ................................................................................................................. 13 Iran’s
    [Show full text]
  • ANTI-AMERICANISM Table of Contents Anti-American Statements
    ANTI-AMERICANISM Table of Contents Anti-American Statements........................................................................................................... 1 Death to America ..................................................................................................................... 1 America Is The Enemy and Its "Enmity Is Endless" ................................................................. 2 The Great Satan ......................................................................................................................4 Regime’s Goal is to Destroy the United States ........................................................................ 5 America Created ISIS and Al-Qaeda ....................................................................................... 6 U.S. Seeks to Dominate Iran, Islamic Lands, and the World .................................................... 8 Timeline of Anti-American Hostilities ........................................................................................... 8 Iran’s Anti-Western Conspiracies .............................................................................................. 15 The Iranian Regime’s Conspiracies ....................................................................................... 15 The Iranian Regime Prohibits ................................................................................................ 19 Anti-American Statements The Iranian regime has maintained its virulent anti-Americanism as a core pillar of its ideology since
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Road to Tehran the Iran Nuclear Deal in Perspective
    THE LONG ROAD TO TEHRAN THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL IN PERSPECTIVE BRYAN R. GIBSON STRATEGIC UPDATE 15.6 DECEMBER 2015 THE AUTHOR Bryan R. Gibson holds a PhD in International History from the London School of Economics, was a post- doctoral research fellow at the LSE’s Centre for Diplomacy and Strategy, and an instructor on Middle Eastern politics in the LSE’s Department of International History and the University of East Anglia’s Department of Political, Social and International Studies (PSI). He has taught undergraduate courses on U.S. and British politics toward the Gulf region, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and Arab nationalism, winning a departmental teaching excellence award in 2011. He also taught undergraduate and postgraduate courses on Middle Eastern politics at the University of East Anglia. He is the author of Sold Out? US Foreign Policy, Iraq, the Kurds, and the Cold War (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), Covert Relationship: U.S. Foreign Policy, Intelligence and the Iran-Iraq War (Praeger, 2010), and co-edited with Professor Nigel Ashton, The Iran- Iraq War: New International Perspectives (Routledge, 2012). He also contributes regularly to publications dealing with Middle Eastern issues, like Foreign Policy, Middle East Eye, CNN, and Huffington Post. His research focuses on foreign policy decision- making with respect to the Middle East and Gulf regions. Specifically, he analyses U.S. foreign policy toward Iraq, Iran, and the Gulf. Gibson 1 THE LONG ROAD TO TEHRAN THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL IN PERSPECTIVE The history of the Iranian nuclear issue is littered with missed opportunities. It is a history in which fixation on the perfect crowded out the good, and in whose rearview mirror we can see deals that look a lot better now than they seemed then.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Guide for “The Iranian Revolution” a Video Interview with Dr
    DISCUSSION GUIDE FOR “THE IRANIAN REVOLUTION” a video interview with Dr. Abbas Milani Organizing • What is a revolution? Questions • What were the successes and failures of the Iranian Revolution? • How did the Iranian Revolution impact or contribute to events in the Middle East, the United States, and the world? • How is the Iranian Revolution similar and different from other revolutions? • What are some of the challenges of writing about a historical event like the Iranian Revolution? Summary In this video, Professor Abbas Milani discusses Iran and the Iranian Revolution, noting the influence of Iran regionally and in the United States, the significance and impact of the Iranian Revolution, and the Iranian Revolution’s causes and effects. He also emphasizes the fight for democracy throughout Iran’s history of revolutions and today. Objectives During and after viewing this video, students will: • gain a general understanding of the course of the Iranian Revolution and the events leading up to it; • examine the definition of revolution and compare the Iranian Revolution with other revolutions; • analyze the significance and impact of the Iranian Revolution in history and today; and • understand the complexities and multiple perspectives of history. “IRANIAN REVOLUTION” DISCUSSION GUIDE 1 introduction Materials Handout 1, Background Guide—Iranian Revolution, pp. 5–9, 30 copies Handout 2, Video Notes, p. 10, 30 copies Handout 3, Connection—Iran Today, pp. 11–12, 5 copies Projection 1, Discussion—What is a revolution?, p. 13 Projection 2, Wrap-up Discussion, p. 14 Answer Key 1, Video Notes, pp. 15–16 Answer Key 2, Connection—Iran Today, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition
    1 U.S. AND IRANIAN STRATEGIC COMPETITION: Iran’s Perceptions of its Internal Developments and their Implications for Strategic Competition with the U.S. in the Gulf, Sept. 2010 – March 2011 By Alexander Wilner May 17, 2011 Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] 2 With the assistance of Adam Seitz of the Marine Corps University, the Burke Chair has compiled a series of chronological reports that focus on Iranian perceptions of national security and assess Iran‟s intentions concerning competition with the US. The latest version of these reports is entitled “U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition: Iran's Perceptions of its Ballistic Missile Program and Competition with the US and the Gulf, Sept. 2010 – Feb. 2011,” and is available on the CSIS web site at http://csis.org/publication/us-and- iranian-strategic-competition-2. Previous versions include “U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition: Iranian Views of How Iran‟s Asymmetric Warfare Developments Affect Competition with the US and the Gulf, Sept. 2010 – Feb. 2011” (http://csis.org/publication/us- and-iranian-strategic-competition-1). The Iranian government‟s statements and actions provide considerable insight into the country‟s strategic competition with the US. They help show how the regime perceives and responds to external pressure and its relationship with the international community. The regime‟s rhetoric regarding its “soft war” against external cultural influence and domestic liberalism as well as laws such as the proposed Supervision of Members of Parliament bill provide key insights into the changing nature of the regime and its outlook.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo Review Essay 234
    H-Diplo ESSAY 234 STATE OF THE FIELD>> UNITED STATES-IRANIAN RELATIONS 22 May 2020 https://hdiplo.org/to/E234 Editor: Diane Labrosse | Production Editor: George Fujii Review by Gregory Brew, Southern Methodist University his essay reviews the state of the field of United States-Iranian relations. Rather than attempt a comprehensive survey of this dynamic and expanding body of scholarship, this essay offers a glimpse of the field as it is currently T evolving, proceeding chronologically according to topic rather than publications. The focus is on U.S.-Iranian relations, broadly defined, though for the sake of consistency diplomatic history is emphasized. Readers will note that works cited here focus predominantly on the international relationship, rather than the United States as an actor within Iran’s modern history.1 Key themes include the evolving importance of the Cold War, transnational ties, interpretations of the Islamic Revolution from the perspective of U.S. policy-makers, and the continued preoccupation with U.S.-Iranian confrontations in the post-revolutionary period. The Cold War and Iran Early encounters between the United States and Iran came chiefly through the work of missionaries, oil companies, and local diplomats.2 A number of diplomatic disputes between Iran and the United States in the 1920s, including the death of American consul Robert Imbrie in 1924, and an abortive effort by the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey to secure an oil concession, marked an era of limited engagement.3 World War II brought about a more concrete American involvement in the country’s politics. Worried that the Anglo- Soviet occupation would weaken Iran’s internal stability, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Obama Administration and the Puzzle of the Iranian Nuclear Program Kaitlin E
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2014 Keeping Iran from the Bomb: The Obama Administration and the Puzzle of the Iranian Nuclear Program Kaitlin E. Marshall Scripps College Recommended Citation Marshall, Kaitlin E., "Keeping Iran from the Bomb: The Obama Administration and the Puzzle of the Iranian Nuclear Program" (2014). Scripps Senior Theses. Paper 387. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/387 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ! ! ! KEEPING IRAN FROM THE BOMB: THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THE PUZZLE OF THE IRANIAN NUCLEAR !PROGRAM ! ! ! ! by! KAITLIN E. MARSHALL! ! ! SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR! OF ARTS ! ! ! PROFESSOR ANDREWS PROFESSOR BODUSZYNSKI! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! APRIL 25, 2014 !1 Table of Contents! Foreword Page 4 Chapter One: A Historic Phone Call Introduction Page 6 Literature Review: Politics Page 11 Literature Review: The Evolution of Stereotypes Page 14 Method Page 17 Chapter Organization Page 18 Conclusion Page 20 Chapter Two: The Hostage Crisis and the Origins of American-Iranian Hostility Build-Up to Revolution Page 22 The United States’ Fears and President Carter’s Mistake Page 25 Imagery of the Great Satan
    [Show full text]
  • Yemen and the Saudi–Iranian 'Cold War'
    Research Paper Peter Salisbury Middle East and North Africa Programme | February 2015 Yemen and the Saudi–Iranian ‘Cold War’ Yemen and the Saudi–Iranian ‘Cold War’ Summary • The competition between Iran and Saudi Arabia for regional influence is exacerbating a number of existing disputes in the region, where the two powers are backing different sides – including Yemen. • This paper argues that primary drivers of tension and conflict in Yemen are local, but the perceived, and often exaggerated, roles of external players continue to affect the calculations of the Yemeni players and of different regional actors. • The Houthis, founded as a revivalist movement for the Zaydi form of Shia Islam that is largely unique to northern Yemen, have transformed themselves over the past decade into a formidable militia, and their military takeover in January 2015 has plunged the country into uncertainty. • Interviews with people who have been granted rare access to the Houthis’ inner circle of leaders suggest that the core leadership is in many cases genuinely committed to the Islamic revolutionary principles set out by Hussein Badr al-Deen al-Houthi, which in turn borrow heavily from those of Iran. • Saudi Arabia perceives the Houthis as an Iranian proxy. However, while the group has some support from Iran, this is not the same as taking orders from it. • Domestically, the Houthis are unlikely to be able to govern the country and deal with its multiple insurgencies alone. Yemen will also require the financial backing of its much wealthier neighbours, above all Saudi Arabia, to prevent its economic collapse. • The issue for Saudi Arabia and the United States in the short and medium term will be how to achieve a working relationship with a key power broker in a strategically important country that is unlikely to feel the need to serve their interests in the way that past regimes in Sana’a have.
    [Show full text]