Dr. Meena Thesis Reg. No. 20101554

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dr. Meena Thesis Reg. No. 20101554 A Dissertation on FETAL NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY BY ULTRA SOUND - A SCREENING TOOL FOR FETAL ABNORMALITIES Dissertation submitted to THE TAMIL NADU Dr. M. G. R. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY CHENNAI. with partial fulfillment of the regulations for the Award of the degree of M.D., (Obstetrics & Gynaecology) Branch – II STANLEY MEDICAL COLLEGE CHENNAI - 600 001. APRIL 2012 BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE Certified that this dissertation is the bonafide work of Dr. M.MEENA on “FETAL NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY BY ULTRASOUND - A SCREENING TOOL FOR FETAL ABNORMALITIES” during her M.D., (Obstetrics & Gynaecology) course from April 2010 to April 2012 at the Stanley Medical College and Raja Sir Ramasamy Mudaliar Lying-in Hospital, Chennai. Prof.Dr.N.Hephzibah kirubamani, Prof.Dr.P.Vasanthamani,M.D.,D.G.O., M.D., D.G.O.,MICOG., Ph.D, Professor & Head of the Department Professor & Chief of the Department Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Stanley Medical College & Stanley Medical College & RSRM Lying In Hospital, RSRM Lying In Hospital, Chennai –600 013. Chennai –600 013. Prof. Dr. S. GEETHA LAKSHMI, M.D., Ph.D DEAN, Stanley Medical College & Hospital, Chennai – 600 001. DECLARATION I solemnly declare that the dissertation titled “FETAL NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY BY ULTRASOUND - A SCREENING TOOL FOR FETAL ABNORMALITIES” is done by me at RSRM Lying in Hospital, Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai during November 2010 to October 2011 under the guidance and supervision of Prof. Dr.P. Vasanthamani, M.D., D.G.O., Professor and Chief of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stanley Medical College & RSRM Lying in Hospital, Chennai-13. This dissertation is submitted to the Tamilnadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University towards the partial fulfillment of requirements for the award of M.D. Degree (Branch II) in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Place : Chennai Date : 21-12-2011 Dr.M.Meena ACKNOWLEDGEMENT At the outset, I would like to place on record my deep sense of gratitude to the Dean, Stanley Medical College, Chennai Prof. Dr. S. Geetha Laksmi, M.D., Ph.D, for her kind permission to use the hospital resources for this study. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my beloved Professor and Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Prof.Dr.N.Hephzibah kirubamani, M.D., D.GO., MICOG., Ph.D, RSRM Lying-in Hospital, for allowing me to undertake this study on “FETAL NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY BY ULTRASOUND - A SCREENING TOOL FOR FETAL ABNORMALITIES” with much avidity. In keeping with the maxim, “All is well that ends well”, I was able to carry out my study to my fullest satisfaction, thanks to guidance, encouragement, motivation and constant supervision extended to me, by my beloved Chief Prof. Dr.P.Vasanthamani M.D., D.G.O., Professor and Chief of Unit I. Hence my profuse thanks are due for her. I would like to place my sincere thanks to Prof.Dr.K.Ruckmani M.D., D.G.O., and all the Unit chiefs for their moral support. I would be failing in my duty if I don’t place on record my sincere thanks to those patients who were the subjects of my study. I am bound by ties of gratitude to my respected Assistant Professors Dr.S.Lavanya, Dr.J.Arumaikannu, Dr.A.Shanthi , and all the Assistant Professors in general, for placing, guiding and goading me on the right track from the very beginning of my career in Obstetrics and Gynaecology and till this day. I am fortunate to have my colleague postgraduates of RSRM Lying in hospital for their invaluable suggestions, relentless help for shouldering my responsibilities. Simply words cannot express its depth for their unseen contributions. I am also thankful to my parents, sister and lastly, my lovable thanks to my husband and my sons and all the family members for their moral support. I thank the Almighty for his immense blessings and support throughout my life. CONTENTS Page No. 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 4 3 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 5 4 MATERIALS AND METHODS 38 5 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 42 6 DISCUSSION 57 7 SUMMARY 61 8 CONCLUSION 63 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY 10 ANNEXURES PROFORMA MASTER CHART KEY TO MASTER CHART ABBREVIATIONS ASD - Atrial septal defect β –HCG - β Human chorionic gonadotrophin CHD - Congenital heart disease CVS - Chorionic villous sampling GDM - Gestational Diabetes Mellitus LSCS - Lower segment caesarean section MA - Maternal age MAS - Meconium Aspiration Syndrome MSAFP - Maternal serum α fetoprotein NB - Nasal bone NT - Nuchal translucency PAPP-A - Pregnancy associated plasma protein- A PROM - Premature rupture of membranes VSD - Ventricular septal defect Introduction INTRODUCTION Prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural malformations during either the first or the second trimester has helped to reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality and also helped in early termination of an anomalous fetus. Although many major fetal defects are diagnosable in the first trimester, the diagnostic accuracy is significantly higher in the mid-second trimester owing to the larger size and more advanced development of the fetus. Mid second trimester screening method is not an ideal tool and search is on for early markers. A great deal of interest has been directed towards shifting prenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities and fetal structural abnormalities to the first trimester (11-14 weeks of gestation) using the sonographic measurement of the fetal Nuchal Translucency (NT) alone or in combination with serum markers [Pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) + free β human chorionic gonadotrophin ( β-HCG)] 1,9 . History of NT measurement Sonographic screening of aneuploidy became a reality in 1985 when Beryl Benacerraf demonstrated thickened nuchal fold in a Downs syndrome fetus 2. Dr. Langdon Down (it is after his name that Downs syndrome has been named) 100 years back, reported that skin of affected fetus at the back of the neck was too large and swollen. This excess skin thickness can be easily studied by ultrasound as Nuchal Translucency (at 11-14 weeks of gestation) 3. Fetal Nuchal translucency thickness at 11-14 weeks scan has been combined with maternal age to provide an effective method of assessing the risk for chromosomal anomalies. In addition increased nuchal translucency identifies a higher proportion of major cardiac defects, skeletal defects and a wide range of genetic syndromes 4. For example, Nicolaides (2004) reported approximately 90% sensitivity for trisomies 18 and 13 with a 1% false positive rate 5. There is also strong association between increasing nuchal translucency and fetal cardiac anomalies. (Atzei and colleagues 2005; Simpson and colleagues 2007) 6,7 . Moreover, results may be abnormal in the setting of a number of structural fetal anomalies (Souka and colleagues 2001) 8. It is widely accepted that the measurement of NT to screen fetal abnormalities should be combined with a search for detectable malformations. The American college of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2007b) recommends that when the nuchal translucency measurement is 3.5 mm or greater with a normal fetal karyotype, then targeted sonographic examination, fetal echocardiography, or both should be considered 9. Visualization of normal fetal anatomy in the first trimester provides reassurance to the patient and reduces anxiety. Early detection of fetal structural malformations allows timely referral to a tertiary centre. For an invasive testing rate of 5% about 75% of trisomic pregnancies can be identified. Assessment of risk for chromosomal defects in the first trimester rather than the second trimester provides the option for earlier invasive diagnostic testing and consequently results in fewer traumas for those couples choosing termination of an affected pregnancy. NT as a screening tool for fetal aneuploidy are less sensitive in younger women because of lower prevalence rates. Gestational age also affects the accuracy of Downs syndrome detection. Testing sensitivity is approximately 5 percent lower if performed at 13 weeks instead of 11 weeks 10 . A study group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has recommended that there is now sufficient evidence to support routine first-trimester nuchal translucency screening with appropriately trained sonographers using high resolution equipments, provided that the results should be subjected to an external agency for regular audit 11 . Aims & Objectives AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 1. To assess fetal Nuchal translucency (NT) in an unselected population of pregnant women with viable singleton pregnancies. 2. To assess usefulness of increased NT in identifying abnormal fetuses. Review of Literature REVIEW OF LITERATURE NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY 1. DEFINITION The Nuchal translucency is defined as the maximum thickness of the subcutaneous translucency between the skin and soft tissues overlying the cervical spine of the fetus and is typically observed in the first trimester (11 to 14 weeks) 4 ULTRA SOUND PICTURES OF FETAL NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY First trimester Fetus Midsagittal view for measuring NT by ultrasound Normal NT Abnormal NT 2. NORMAL NT MEASUREMENTS Fetal nuchal translucency thickness increases with crown – rump length (CRL) and, therefore, it is essential to take gestation into account when determining whether a given translucency thickness is increased 12-14 . CRL vs Gestational age (weeks) Nuchal Translucency normally increases with gestation (CRL) The 50 th percentile values for NT thickness are 1.2 mm and 1.9 mm for a CRL of 45mm (11 th week) and 85 mm (13 weeks+6 days) respectively, and the 95 th percentile values are 2 mm and 2.8 mm respectively. 15 Currently the more accepted method is to base the cut off on a progressive rise, using the 95 th percentile as the threshold for an abnormal measurement resulting in a more sensitive and specific indicator for the detection of an anomalous fetus. Centile chart for NT 3. RISK FOR TRISOMY BASED ON NT Less than 2.5 mm: risk is 5 times lesser for that age More than 2.5 mm: 12 fold increased risk.
Recommended publications
  • Hamilton Radiologu Nuchal Translucencey
    PATIENT INFORMATION Advice regarding your 12 week scan Nuchal Translucency HAMILTON RADIOLOGY MEDICAL IMAGING SPECIALISTS YOU’RE IN SAFE HANDS A Few Facts . • The vast majority of babies are born normal. • All women, whatever their age, have a small risk of delivering a baby with physical and/or intellectual impairment. • In some cases the impairment is due to a chromosome abnormality such as Downs Syndrome (Trisomy 21). • The programme will only accept foetuses with a crown rump length between 4.5 and 8.3cm ie within the 11+2 days – 13 weeks 6 days period. Optimal time for this scan is 12–13 weeks. • The scan gives an estimate of the risk for Downs Syndrome. To know for sure whether or not the foetus has a chromosomal abnormality, an invasive test is needed (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis). • However, invasive tests carry a small risk of causing miscarriage (1%). • The early scan allows detection of some, but not all, physical defects. A further scan at 19–20 weeks is recommended. Risk for Downs Syndrome The table to the right shows how the chance of having a baby with Downs Syndrome increases with age. The First Trimester Scan At the 12 week scan we confi rm that the foetus is alive and we assess the gestational age by measuring the crown-rump length. We can look for major physical defects, measure nuchal translucency thickness and calculate your baby’s chance of Downs Syndrome based on the scan fi ndings and your age. Occasionally the foetus is not well seen on the abdominal scan and it may be necessary to perform a transvaginal scan.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoamniotic Twins: What Should Be the Optimal Antenatal Management?
    Monoamniotic Twins: What Should Be the Optimal Antenatal Management? Ashis K. Sau1, Kate Langford1, Catherine Elliott1, Lin L. Su2, and Darryl J. Maxwell1 1Fetal Medicine Unit, St.Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK 2National University Hospital, Singapore onoamniotic twinning is a rare event with an incidence of London with a high proportion of socially deprived and M1% of all monozygotic twins and associated with a high black, Asian or mixed race peoples. Management protocols fetal morbidity and mortality. Confident early diagnosis is possi- ble, but optimal management is not yet established. This article employed were those of early detection of chorionicity and presents the experience of a single centre in managing all amnionicity, 2-weekly serial ultrasound surveillance and monoamniotic twins diagnosed during 1994–2000. Seven pairs early delivery by elective cesarean section at around 32 of monoamniotic twins were identified for analysis. All were weeks gestation. From 1997, a formal twin ultrasound sur- managed in accord with a unit protocol that involved early diag- veillance clinic was established and first trimester nuchal nosis, serial ultrasound examination and elective early delivery. In four cases, the detection of monoamnionicity was made translucency screening was performed. The same fetal med- during a first trimester nuchal scan. Discordance for structural icine consultant had clinical input into the management of abnormality was found in three cases where the co-twin was all cases. A summary of the cases can be seen in Table 1. normal. Cord entanglement was detected antenatally in four cases. Two pairs of twins died before 20 weeks. One of these Case 1 had early onset twin–twin transfusion syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening for Trisomy 21 in Denmark; Evaluation of the Current and Possible Future Strategies
    Faculty of Health Sciences University of Copenhagen Screening for trisomy 21 in Denmark; Evaluation of the current and possible future strategies PhD thesis Charlotte Kvist Ekelund Academic supervisors Ann Tabor, professor, DMSc, Department of Fetal Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen Olav Bjørn Petersen, PhD, consultant, Department of Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital Ida Vogel, DMSc, Head of Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital Evaluation committee Katja Bilardo, Professor, Head Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands Michael Christiansen, Head of Molecular Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen Lone Krebs, DMSc, Associate professor, consultant, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Holbæk Sygehus, University of Copenhagen The PhD defence will take place Friday the 13th of April 2012, Auditorium B, Teilum, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen. Acknowledgement This thesis was made possible by help from a number of fantastic supervisors and colleagues. First and foremost, I owe my deepest thanks to Professor Ann Tabor. Thank you for sharing your interest and knowledge in first trimester screening with me, for your professional and personal guidance, for always having time and for showing your confidence in me from the very beginning of the project. Your constructive and focused attitude is admirable and to me you have been an extremely inspiring mentor within all aspects of life. I am greatly indebted to Olav Bjørn Petersen, MD, PhD, one of the most enthusiastic and optimistic persons I know. Your positive attitude, support and encouragement have really helped me through the challenging phases of the project. And my sincere thanks to Ida Vogel, MD, DMSc for taking part in the project, for everything you taught me many years ago and for still being there.
    [Show full text]
  • Antenatal Care: Timetable
    Antenatal care: timetable NICE issued guidelines on routine care for the healthy pregnant woman in March 2008. They recommend: 10 antenatal visits in the first pregnancy if uncomplicated 7 antenatal visits in subsequent pregnancies if uncomplicated women do not need to be seen by a consultant if the pregnancy is uncomplicated Gestation Purpose of visit 8 - 12 weeks (ideally < 10 Booking visit weeks) general information e.g. diet, alcohol, smoking, folic acid, vitamin D, antenatal classes BP, urine dipstick, check BMI Booking bloods/urine FBC, blood group, rhesus status, red cell alloantibodies, haemoglobinopathies hepatitis B, syphilis, rubella HIV test is offered to all women urine culture to detect asymptomatic bacteriuria 10 - 13 weeks Early scan to confirm dates, exclude multiple pregnancy 11 - 13+6 weeks Down's syndrome screening including nuchal scan 16 weeks Information on the anomaly and the blood results. If Hb < 11 g/dl consider iron Routine care: BP and urine dipstick 18 - 20+6 weeks Anomaly scan 25 weeks (only if primip) Routine care: BP, urine dipstick, symphysis-fundal height (SFH) 28 weeks Routine care: BP, urine dipstick, SFH Second screen for anaemia and atypical red cell alloantibodies. If Hb < 10.5 g/dl consider iron First dose of anti-D prophylaxis to rhesus negative women 31 weeks (only if primip) Routine care as above 34 weeks Routine care as above Second dose of anti-D prophylaxis to rhesus negative women Information on labour and birth plan 36 weeks Routine care as above Check presentation - offer external cephalic version if indicated Information on breast feeding, vitamin K, 'baby-blues' 38 weeks Routine care as above 40 weeks (only if primip) Routine care as above Discussion about options for prolonged pregnancy 41 weeks Routine care as above Discuss labour plans and possibility of induction 1 Prescribing in pregnant patients Very few drugs are known to be completely safe in pregnancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Downs, Edwards & Pataus Screening Protocol (CG481)
    Down’s, Edwards’ and Pataus syndromes screening protocol (CG481) Approval and Authorisation Approval Group Job Title, Chair of Committee Date Maternity Clinical Governance Chair, Maternity Clinical 4th June 2021 Committee Governance Committee Change History Version Date Author, job title Reason 8.0 Mar 2018 Jo Young, AN screening Reviewed and updated to reflect coordinator current practice 8.1 February J Young, AN screening Live change to update reporting 2019 coordinator body to PHE FASP and adjust working practices in line with this change. 8.2 August J Young, AN screening Live change following PHE Audit 2019 coordinator July 2019 Pg 6 – 5.5 The Combined Test gestation period in which NT scan can take place updated to read 11+2 and 14+1 weeks 9.0 March 2020 J Young, AN screening Reviewed, changes throughout to coordinator reflect current practice pg 5 – 16 and introduction of new MATSOP039 and update of consent form 10.0 May 2021 S Lindsay-Birch, ANNB Live change to reflect process post Screening Specialist MW Go Live and introduction of NIPT from 1/6/21 ................................................................................................................................................................... This protocol should be read in conjunction with the following: • Antenatal Screening protocol (CG474) • MAT-SOP-039 NT daily failsafe (WBCH only) Author: S Lindsay-Birch Date: June 2021 Job Title: ANNB Screening Specialist MW Review Date: June 2023 Policy Lead: Group Director Urgent Care Version: V10.0 Location: Policy hub/ Clinical/ Maternity/ Antenatal/ CG481 This document is valid only on date last printed Page 1 of 19 Maternity guidelines – Downs, Edwards & Pataus syndromes screening protocol (CG481) June 2021 Contents 1.0 Purpose .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Progesterone Use in the First Trimester on Fetal Nuchal Translucency
    Original Investigation 29 The effect of progesterone use in the first trimester on fetal nuchal translucency Müberra Namlı Kalem1, Ziya Kalem2, Batuhan Bakırarar3, Ali Ergün1, Timur Gürgan2 1Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liv Hospital, Ankara, Turkey 2Gürgan Clinic IVF and Women Health Center, Ankara, Turkey 3Department of Biostatistic, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey Abstract Objective: To evaluate the possible association between progesterone use in the first trimester of pregnancy and fetal nuchal translucency (NT). Material and Methods: This is an observational case-control study, which was conducted with patients who underwent nuchal scans between March 2015 and February 2016 and consequently delivered live and healthy babies. The study group was composed of assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and used intravaginal progesterone 180 mg/day until gestational week 12. The control group comprised pregnant women who became pregnant spontaneously without using any progesterone preparation in the first trimester. Results: One hundred sixty-four (57.5%) of 285 patients were in the control group and 121 (42.5%) were in the progesterone group. Age, bodyweight, gravidity, and parity number of previous births and abortus, gestational week, crown-rump lengths, free β-human chorionic gonadotropin, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and NT values of the progesterone and control groups were recorded and we investigated whether there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of these parameters; maternal weight was found to be higher in the progesterone group than in the control group and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (p=0.019 and p=0.025).
    [Show full text]
  • The Identification and Validation of Neural Tube Defects in the General Practice Research Database
    THE IDENTIFICATION AND VALIDATION OF NEURAL TUBE DEFECTS IN THE GENERAL PRACTICE RESEARCH DATABASE Scott T. Devine A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Public Health (Epidemiology). Chapel Hill 2007 Approved by Advisor: Suzanne West Reader: Elizabeth Andrews Reader: Patricia Tennis Reader: John Thorp Reader: Andrew Olshan © 2007 Scott T Devine ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - ii- ABSTRACT Scott T. Devine The Identification And Validation Of Neural Tube Defects In The General Practice Research Database (Under the direction of Dr. Suzanne West) Background: Our objectives were to develop an algorithm for the identification of pregnancies in the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) that could be used to study birth outcomes and pregnancy and to determine if the GPRD could be used to identify cases of neural tube defects (NTDs). Methods: We constructed a pregnancy identification algorithm to identify pregnancies in 15 to 45 year old women between January 1, 1987 and September 14, 2004. The algorithm was evaluated for accuracy through a series of alternate analyses and reviews of electronic records. We then created electronic case definitions of anencephaly, encephalocele, meningocele and spina bifida and used them to identify potential NTD cases. We validated cases by querying general practitioners (GPs) via questionnaire. Results: We analyzed 98,922,326 records from 980,474 individuals and identified 255,400 women who had a total of 374,878 pregnancies. There were 271,613 full-term live births, 2,106 pre- or post-term births, 1,191 multi-fetus deliveries, 55,614 spontaneous abortions or miscarriages, 43,264 elective terminations, 7 stillbirths in combination with a live birth, and 1,083 stillbirths or fetal deaths.
    [Show full text]
  • |||FREE||| Obstetrics and Gynecology
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY FREE DOWNLOAD Charles R. B. Beckmann,William N.P. Herbert,Douglas W. Laube,Frank Ling,Roger P. Smith | 528 pages | 21 Mar 2013 | Lippincott Williams and Wilkins | 9781451144314 | English | Philadelphia, United States Register for a free account We are grateful for the outstanding care she has provided to our patients. Connect with us on social media! August Learn how and when to remove this template message. Read more. Our providers recommend these 6 helpful tips for reducing your period pain. I haven't seen someone like that in a long time and it was such a Obstetrics and Gynecology surprise. Call us or email us with any questions or to schedule your visit. Chorionic villus sampling Amniocentesis Triple test Quad test Fetoscopy Fetal scalp blood testing Fetal scalp stimulation test Percutaneous umbilical cord blood sampling Apt test Kleihauer—Betke test Lung maturity Lecithin—sphingomyelin ratio Lamellar body count Fetal fibronectin test. Get Obstetrics and Gynecology touch. Wellness and Integrative Care. From pre-conception Now Accepting New Patients Schedule an appointment today. I was in and out in the shortest time possible. Some procedures may include: [8]. Your Partner For a Lifetime of Care. Experienced OB-GYN professionals can seek certifications in sub-specialty areas, including maternal and fetal medicine. You can rest easy knowing that one of our physicians is always on call, 24 hours a day, to deliver your baby. Are you accepting new patients? Imaging Obstetric ultrasonography Nuchal scan Anomaly scan Fetal movement counting Contraction stress test Nonstress test Vibroacoustic stimulation Biophysical profile Amniotic fluid index Umbilical artery dopplers.
    [Show full text]
  • Etaudar Nitellub G
    Graduate Bulletin 2006-2007 2 The University of Akron 2006-2007 Calendar 2006-2007 For a copy of the Undergraduate Bulletin contact the Office of Admissions, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325-2001. 330-972-7100, or toll-free, 1- 800-655-4884. Fall Semester 2006 Day and evening classes begin Mon., Aug. 28 *Labor Day (day and evening) Mon., Sept. 4 Inquiries Spring 2007 advancement to candidacy due Fri., Sept. 15 Address inquiries concerning: Veterans Day (classes held; staff holiday) Fri., Nov. 10 Graduate study to the Graduate School, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325-2101. 330-972-7663. **Thanksgiving Break Thu.-Sun., Nov. 23-26 Classes resume Mon., Nov. 27 Financial aid, scholarships, loans, and student employment to the Office of Student Financial Aid, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325-6211. 330- Final instructional day Sat., Dec. 9 972-7032. Toll free 1-800-621-3847. Fax 330-972-7139. Final examination period Mon.-Sat., Dec. 11-16 Athletics to the Athletic Director, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325- Commencement Sat., Dec. 16 5201. 330-972-7080. Winter Intersession Sat.-Sat., Dec. 23–Jan. 13 Registration, scheduling, residency requirements, and veteran’s affairs to the Office of the Registrar, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325-6208. 330- 972-8300. Spring Semester 2007 Undergraduate admissions information, campus tours, housing, and transfer Spring 2007 graduation applications due Wed., Jan. 3 of credits to the Office of Admissions, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325-2001. 330-972-7077 or toll-free inside Ohio, 1-800-655-4884.
    [Show full text]
  • Maternity Services Guideline Antenatal Appointments
    MATERNITY SERVICES GUIDELINE ANTENATAL APPOINTMENTS GUIDELINE Version Authors Michala Little - Community Midwifery Manager Kath Chapman – Community Midwifery Team Leader Lynda Fairclough - Community Midwifery Team Leader Owner Michala Little Community Midwifery Manager Date of First issue 1994 Version 12.1 Date of Version issue September 2019 Ratified by York: Obs & Gynae Clinical Scarborough: Obs & Gynae Governance Forum Clinical Governance Forum Date Ratified 12.11.19 12.11.19 Review date September 2021 Version information Significant changes to previous version. Update September 2019 to include aspirin changes, VTE update, proteinurea guidance and safeguarding info Antenatal Appointment Guideline Version No. 12.1 November 2019 – September 2021 Page 1 of 30 Contents Section Title Page 1 Introduction & Scope 3 2 Management 3 2.1 The Booking Process 3 2.2 Criteria for Midwifery Led Care 3 2.3 Criteria for Consultant Review 4 2.4 Criteria for Planned Homebirth 5 2.5 Booking Risk Assessment 6 2.6 Frequency of A/N Visits for Low Risk Women 10 3 Links with 17 4 References 17 Appendices Appendix 1: Referral Flowchart from M/W led Care to Consultant 19 Appendix 2: Procedure for Women Who Attend Antenatal or a Community Clinic without Handheld Pregnancy Records 20 Appendix 3: Procedure for women who do not attend appointments(DNA) 21 Appendix 4: Procedure for women who decline blood products 22 Appendix 5: Procedure for Measuring Symphsis-Fundal Height 23 Appendix 6: High incidence of TB by country 24 Appendix7: Northern and Yorkshire Cleft Lip and Palate service 25 Appendix 8: Flowchart for women recommended to take low dose aspirin 26 Appendix 9: Ante natal payments pathway 27 Appendix 10: Screening for domestic abuse in pregnancy 29 Appendix 11: Pathway of care for women having blood taken for grouping and Antibody Screening’ guideline 30 Antenatal Appointment Guideline Version No.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoamniotic Twins: What Should Be the Optimal Antenatal Management?
    Monoamniotic Twins: What Should Be the Optimal Antenatal Management? Ashis K. Sau1, Kate Langford1, Catherine Elliott1, Lin L. Su2, and Darryl J. Maxwell1 1Fetal Medicine Unit, St.Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK 2National University Hospital, Singapore onoamniotic twinning is a rare event with an incidence of London with a high proportion of socially deprived and M1% of all monozygotic twins and associated with a high black, Asian or mixed race peoples. Management protocols fetal morbidity and mortality. Confident early diagnosis is possi- ble, but optimal management is not yet established. This article employed were those of early detection of chorionicity and presents the experience of a single centre in managing all amnionicity, 2-weekly serial ultrasound surveillance and monoamniotic twins diagnosed during 1994–2000. Seven pairs early delivery by elective cesarean section at around 32 of monoamniotic twins were identified for analysis. All were weeks gestation. From 1997, a formal twin ultrasound sur- managed in accord with a unit protocol that involved early diag- veillance clinic was established and first trimester nuchal nosis, serial ultrasound examination and elective early delivery. In four cases, the detection of monoamnionicity was made translucency screening was performed. The same fetal med- during a first trimester nuchal scan. Discordance for structural icine consultant had clinical input into the management of abnormality was found in three cases where the co-twin was all cases. A summary of the cases can be seen in Table 1. normal. Cord entanglement was detected antenatally in four cases. Two pairs of twins died before 20 weeks. One of these Case 1 had early onset twin–twin transfusion syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Can We Detect Congenital Abnormalities Earlier in Pregnancy
    The Quality and Safety Challenge 2012 Improving quality and safety in maternity services: can we improve prevention, detection and management of congenital abnormalities in pregnancy? Professor Cindy Farquhar, Nicola Arroll, Dr Lynn Sadler, Professor Peter Stone & Vicki Masson PMMRC National Coordinator Services and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland i Acknowledgements We are grateful to the following groups and individuals for their assistance in the production of this report. • The Quality and Safety Challenge 2012 for providing the funding for the project. • The lead maternity carers, general practitioners and District Health Board staff for providing the additional information. • The ultrasound service providers, for supplying the ultrasound images. • PMMRC national coordination service for providing guidance and assistance for collecting the additional data. • Senior sonographer Jenny Mitchell who contributed her time and knowledge. • Dr Sue Belgrave, Dr Tom Gentles and Dr Nicola Austin who undertook the peer review of the report. Author contributions • Professor Cindy Farquhar conceived and supervised the audit and provided revision of the report. • Nicola Arroll collected and assembled the data, contributed to the data analysis and drafting and editing of the report. • Dr Lynn Sadler was involved in the design of the study, provided analysis and interpretation of the data as well as revision of the report. • Professor Peter Stone provided interpretation of the data and made contributions to the report. • Vicki Masson was involved in the conception and design of the study and made contributions to and revised the report. i Executive summary and recommendations The Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee (PMMRC) is responsible for reviewing and reporting on all perinatal deaths with a view to reducing these deaths.
    [Show full text]