DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigating the Effects and Potential Impacts of Lionfish (Pterois Spp.) in Low Salinity Habitats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investigating the Effects and Potential Impacts of Lionfish (Pterois Spp.) in Low Salinity Habitats Investigating the effects and potential impacts of lionfish (Pterois spp.) in low salinity habitats. Submitted by Rebekah Trehern to the University of Exeter for the degree of Masters by Research in Biological Sciences in April 2019. Supervisors: Dr Lucy Hawkes and Dr Travis Van Leeuwen This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. 1 Abstract In this thesis, I use physiological and behavioural experiments in a laboratory environment to assess the impacts and potential effects of the invasive lionfish (Pterois spp. (Wilcox et al. 2018)) in a mangrove ecosystem. Chapter 1 of the thesis is a general introduction to the main theme of the thesis “lionfish in mangroves”. In this chapter, I present an introduction to invasive species, a general background about the introduction of lionfish in the Western Atlantic and wider Caribbean, the importance of mangrove ecosystems, and then end with the recent discovery of lionfish in mangrove ecosystems. Chapters 2 and 3 are the data chapters of the thesis. In Chapter 2, lionfish were reared in aquaria in the Bahamas under differing salinity treatments (37 ppt (typical reef ecosystem salinity), 20 ppt (typical mangrove ecosystem salinity) and 10 ppt (typical mangrove ecosystem salinity during low tide)) for 84 days. This experiment investigated the effect of acute hyposalinity on growth rate, metabolic rate (standard metabolic rate (SMR), maximal metabolic rate (MMR) and aerobic scope (AS)), maximum food consumption, feeding rates and specific dynamic action (SDAMax, SDAScope, SDATotal, SDADuration). Most lionfish survived in hyposaline conditions for 84 days until the conclusion of the experiment, however, various aspects of their physiology were effected. Lionfish feeding and aerobic capacity (MMR and AS) were reduced, whereas digestive duration (SDADuration) increased at the lowest salinity. Therefore, I suggest: 1) given the ability of lionfish to tolerate low salinity, updated range expansion models should incorporate salinity data to improve accuracy of predicted range expansion for lionfish, and 2) the invasion of lionfish in mangrove habitats with low salinity, although a serious concern, will unlikely lead to the same level of population increase, habitat destruction and decline in native fish populations as observed for some 2 Caribbean coral reef habitats. In Chapter 3, I explore the potential impact of lionfish on a native fish species, which typically occupies a similar trophic niche as lionfish in an invaded mangrove ecosystem, the Schoolmaster snapper (Lutjanus apodus). Using a habitat competition experiment in the laboratory at two salinity treatments (10 ppt (typical mangrove ecosystem salinity during low tide) and 37 ppt (typical reef ecosystem salinity)), I investigated the behavioural interactions between invasive lionfish and native Schoolmaster snapper in a simulated mangrove ecosystem. Schoolmaster snapper showed, on average, a 53% reduction in shelter use when in the presence of lionfish. Results suggest that lionfish have the ability to displace snapper from shelter and are therefore likely to increase the vulnerability of native mangrove fish species to predation by other mangrove meso-predators. Using a behavioural ethogram, I further identified key behaviours displayed by both fish species during a period in which lionfish and snapper both had access to shelter. However, salinity had no effect on the occurrence and outcome of these behaviours, despite my findings in Chapter 2. Chapter 4 is the general discussion of the thesis where I draw on previous research, as well as research from this study to place in context the novel threat of the lionfish invasion in mangroves. Overall, this thesis investigates the invasiveness of lionfish in a mangrove ecosystem by demonstrating their ability to tolerate and function in low salinity water for extended periods. 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................... 4 List of Tables .................................................................................................. 6 List of Figures ................................................................................................ 7 Author’s Declaration .................................................................................... 10 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1: General Introduction ................................................................. 13 An introduction to invasive species .......................................................... 13 Lionfish and their invasion ......................................................................... 14 The importance of mangrove habitats ....................................................... 16 Lionfish in mangroves ................................................................................. 17 Thesis research ........................................................................................... 17 Chapter 2: Tolerances of a marine invader: bioenergetic responses of lionfish (Pterois spp.) to an environment of lowered salinity. ................. 22 Introduction .................................................................................................. 22 Methods ........................................................................................................ 27 Animal capture and transport ..................................................................... 27 Lionfish husbandry and feeding ................................................................. 28 Salinity treatments ...................................................................................... 30 Measuring metabolic rates ......................................................................... 30 Measuring maximal metabolic rate (MMR) ................................................ 32 Standard metabolic rate (SMR) and determination of aerobic scope (AS) 33 Specific dynamic action (SDA) ................................................................... 33 Calculations and statistical analyses .......................................................... 34 Ethics.......................................................................................................... 35 Results .......................................................................................................... 35 Growth, average prey consumption time and maximum food consumption ................................................................................................................... 35 Standard metabolic rate, maximal metabolic rate and aerobic scope ........ 36 Specific dynamic action .............................................................................. 36 Mortalities ................................................................................................... 36 Discussion .................................................................................................... 37 Figures and Tables ...................................................................................... 43 Chapter 3: The lion, the fish, and the mangrove: interactions between Schoolmaster snapper and invasive lionfish in a simulated mangrove ecosystem .................................................................................................... 48 Introduction .................................................................................................. 48 Methods ........................................................................................................ 53 4 Animal capture and transport ..................................................................... 53 Animal rearing, husbandry and feeding ..................................................... 53 Salinity treatments ...................................................................................... 54 Behavioural interactions ............................................................................. 54 Video analysis ............................................................................................ 55 Behavioural ethogram ................................................................................ 56 Calculations and statistical analyses .......................................................... 56 Ethics.......................................................................................................... 56 Results .......................................................................................................... 57 Discussion .................................................................................................... 58 Figures and Tables ...................................................................................... 64 Chapter 4: General Discussion .................................................................. 71 Bibliography ................................................................................................. 74 5 List of Tables Table 1.1 A comprehensive list of publications identifying lionfish in mangroves and other low salinity habitats including: location, methodology and main conclusions……………………………..…………………..………………………..19
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Feeding Ecology of the Schoolmaster Snapper, <I>Lutjanus Apodus</I
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 56(3): 881-894, 1995 CORAL REEF PAPER FEEDING ECOLOGY OF THE SCHOOLMASTER SNAPPER, LUTJANUS APODUS (WALBAUM), FROM SOUTHWESTERN PUERTO RICO Jay R. Rooker ABSTRACT Stomach contents from 449 schoolmaster snapper, Lutjanus apodus, from southwestern Puerto Rico were examined. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified two primary trophic groups: ::;70 mm FL and >70 mm FL. Small L. apodus (::;70 mm) fed almost exclusive]y on crustaceans (89% by weight; 95% by numbcr; 98% frequency of occurrence), particularly amphipods and crabs, By contrast, L. apodus greater than 70 mm preferred piscine prey (57% by weight; 37% by number; 63% frequency of occurrence) and supplemented their diets with crabs, shrimp, and stomatopods, Ontogenetic patterns in diet were related to changes in jaw morphology (i.e., gape dimensions). Moreover, spatial and temporal variations were size- related and appeared to play some role in structuring the diet of L. apodus. Small L. apodus (::;70 mm) were found only in mangrove prop-root habitats and showed peak fecding at midday, Larger L. apodus (>70 mm) were present in both mangrove and coral reef habitats and showed ]ittle variation in diurnal feeding periodicity. Prey selection patterns of L. apodus were influenced by habitat and season. The schoolmaster snapper, Lutjanus apodus (Lutjanidae), is the most commonly encountered lutjanid on coral reefs in the Caribbean (Randall, 1983) and Bahamas (Bohlke and Chaplin, 1968). L. apodus appears confined to reefs more than other snappers (Randall, 1967); however, it has also been reported as the predominant lutjanid in areas adjacent to or inside mangrove prop-root habitats (Austin, 1971; Austin and Austin, 1971; Kimmel, 1985; Rooker and Dennis, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Trophic Ecology of Generalist Consumers: a Case Study of the Invasive Lionfish in the Bahamas
    Vol. 448: 131–141, 2012 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published February 23 doi: 10.3354/meps09511 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Characterizing trophic ecology of generalist consumers: a case study of the invasive lionfish in The Bahamas Craig A. Layman1,*, Jacob E. Allgeier2 1Marine Sciences Program, Florida International University, 3000 N.E. 151st St., North Miami, Florida 33181, USA 2Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA ABSTRACT: Population sizes of generalist consumers are increasing in many ecosystems because of various human activities, and it is critical to understand the trophic role of these generalist spe- cies if we are to predict how they may affect food web structure and ecosystem function. Lionfish Pterois volitans/miles have spread throughout the Western Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico and they may have significant effects on native faunal communities. We characterized the trophic ecology of lionfish in back reef habitats on Abaco Island, Bahamas, drawing on recently developed analyt- ical tools that employ both direct diet information and stable isotope data. Although δ15N and δ13C bi-plot data appeared to suggest substantial niche overlap with native gray snapper and school- master snapper, Bayesian analytical tools suggested differences in core isotopic niches among the species. This was consistent with direct diet information, as lionfish fed almost exclusively on small prey fishes and snapper fed more commonly on crustaceans. When combining empirical iso- tope and diet data in a simulation model, individual lionfish appear to be more specialized in their diets than schoolmaster snapper. We suggest that this pattern may be driven by high site-fidelity of lionfish, in conjunction with distinct prey assemblages at the patch scale.
    [Show full text]
  • SEDAR Caribbean Mutton Snapper
    SEDAR Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review _________________________________________________________________ SEDAR 14 Stock Assessment Report Caribbean Mutton Snapper SEDAR 14 Stock Assessment Report 2 2007 SEDAR 4055 Faber Place #201 North Charleston, SC 29401 (843) 571-4366 Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction Section 2. Data Workshop Report Section 3. Assessment Workshop Report Section 4. Review Workshop Reports Section 5. Addenda and Post-Review Updates SEDAR 14 Stock Assessment Report 2 Caribbean Mutton Snapper SECTION I. Introduction Introduction Table of Contenst 1. SEDAR Overview............................................................................................................. 1 2. Mutton Snapper Management Overview.......................................................................... 2 3. SoutheastRegionMaps......................................................................................................10 SEDAR 14 Caribbean Mutton Snapper 1. SEDAR Overview SEDAR (Southeast Data, Assessment and Review) was initially developed by the Southeast Fisheries Science Center and the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council to improve the quality and reliability of stock assessments and to ensure a robust and independent peer review of stock assessment products. SEDAR was expanded in 2003 to address the assessment needs of all three Fishery Management Council in the Southeast Region (South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean) and to provide a platform for reviewing assessments developed through the Atlantic
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Trawling and Habitat Use on Red Snapper and the Associated
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Louisiana State University Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2007 The effects of trawling and habitat use on red snapper and the associated community Robert Joseph David Wells Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Wells, Robert Joseph David, "The effects of trawling and habitat use on red snapper and the associated community" (2007). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1821. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1821 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE EFFECTS OF TRAWLING AND HABITAT USE ON RED SNAPPER AND THE ASSOCIATED COMMUNITY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences by Robert Joseph David Wells B.S., Oregon State University, 1998 M.S., Texas A&M University, 2002 May 2007 DEDICATION This piece of work is dedicated to the most important and influential people in my life. My wife, Janel Wells, my son, Caden Wells, and my parents, Joe and Sue Wells.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Years in Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve: an Evaluation of Reef Health and Reserve Effectiveness Between 2011-2015
    REGISTERED CHARITY 1098893 Blue Ventures Conservation Report Five Years in Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve: an evaluation of reef health and reserve effectiveness between 2011-2015. Tyrell Reyes, Hannah Gilchrist, Olivia Lacasse, Friederike Peiffer, Henry Duffy & Alison Druskat December 2019 Blue Ventures, Level 2 Annex, Omnibus Business Centre, 39-41 North Road, London, N7 9DP, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)207 697 8598 Web: www.blueventures.org Email: [email protected] Blue Ventures Conservation Report © Blue Ventures 2019. Copyright in this publication and in all text, data and images contained herein, except as otherwise indicated, rests with Blue Ventures. Keywords: Belize, Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve, coral reef Authors: Tyrell Reyes, Hannah Gilchrist, Olivia Lacasse, Friederike Peiffer, Henry Duffy & Alison Druskat Contributors: Daniela Escontrela, Anna Simmons, Lucy Anderson, Andreina Acosta & Clara Sabal. Fieldwork supervised by: Jennifer Chapman (2011-2012), Nikkita Lawton (2011), Sarah Beach (2011-2013), Klavdija Jenko (2012-2013), Philippa Swannell (2013), Winnie Courtene-Jones (2013-2014), Me’ira Mizrahi (2014), Tom Nuttall-Smith (2014), Anouk Neuhaus (2015) & Daniela Escontrela (2015). Fieldwork conducted by: Volunteers and staff of Blue Ventures Expeditions, 2011-2015. Editors: Hannah Gilchrist, Jennifer Chapman, Charlotte Gough, Alison Druskat & Fabian Kyne Recommended citation: Reyes, T., Gilchrist, H., Lacasse, O., Peiffer, F., Duffy, H., and Druskat, A. 2019. Five years at Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve, an evaluation of reef health and reserve effectiveness. Blue Ventures Conservation Report, Blue Ventures, London. Acknowledgements: Blue Ventures would like to thank the Belize Fisheries Department for their on-going collaboration, in particular Henry Brown, the Fisheries Biologist for Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve throughout the period covered by this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume III of This Document)
    4.1.3 Coastal Migratory Pelagics Description and Distribution (from CMP Am 15) The coastal migratory pelagics management unit includes cero (Scomberomous regalis), cobia (Rachycentron canadum), king mackerel (Scomberomous cavalla), Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) and little tunny (Euthynnus alleterattus). The mackerels and tuna in this management unit are often referred to as ―scombrids.‖ The family Scombridae includes tunas, mackerels and bonitos. They are among the most important commercial and sport fishes. The habitat of adults in the coastal pelagic management unit is the coastal waters out to the edge of the continental shelf in the Atlantic Ocean. Within the area, the occurrence of coastal migratory pelagic species is governed by temperature and salinity. All species are seldom found in water temperatures less than 20°C. Salinity preference varies, but these species generally prefer high salinity. The scombrids prefer high salinities, but less than 36 ppt. Salinity preference of little tunny and cobia is not well defined. The larval habitat of all species in the coastal pelagic management unit is the water column. Within the spawning area, eggs and larvae are concentrated in the surface waters. (from PH draft Mackerel Am. 18) King Mackerel King mackerel is a marine pelagic species that is found throughout the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea and along the western Atlantic from the Gulf of Maine to Brazil and from the shore to 200 meter depths. Adults are known to spawn in areas of low turbidity, with salinity and temperatures of approximately 30 ppt and 27°C, respectively. There are major spawning areas off Louisiana and Texas in the Gulf (McEachran and Finucane 1979); and off the Carolinas, Cape Canaveral, and Miami in the western Atlantic (Wollam 1970; Schekter 1971; Mayo 1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 415:211
    Vol. 415: 211–220, 2010 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published September 29 doi: 10.3354/meps08714 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Intrapopulation variation in habitat use by two abundant coastal fish species Caroline M. Hammerschlag-Peyer*, Craig A. Layman Marine Sciences Program, Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, 3000 N.E. 151st Street, North Miami, Florida 33181, USA ABSTRACT: Decline of marine fisheries has become one of the most severe global environmental crises. In typical fishery management efforts, fish populations are often treated as homogeneous units, thereby tacitly ignoring potential intrapopulation variation within taxonomic groupings. We used acoustic telemetry and stable isotope analysis to examine movement patterns of 20 gray snap- per Lutjanus griseus and 20 schoolmaster snapper L. apodus in a Bahamian tidal creek and wetland. In particular, we examined (1) if intrapopulation variation in fish habitat use and movement patterns existed, (2) whether that variation was a function of body size, and (3) if there was evidence of spe- cialization in habitat use among individuals. We found that movement varied substantially among individuals, but was independent of body size. Some individuals exhibited frequent, repeated, move- ments to certain areas of the study site. δ13C values of individual snapper were significantly related to movement metrics, suggesting that movement differences were related to specific patterns of for- aging behavior. Our findings suggest the importance of incorporating intrapopulation niche varia- tion—a source of variation that is often overlooked in traditional conservation and management strategies—into the study of coastal fish populations. KEY WORDS: Behavioral ecology · Body size · Fisheries · Food web · Individual specialization · Movement patterns · Optimal foraging theory · Stable isotopes Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION seek to identify broad generalities that define the ‘typ- ical’ individual of a particular population.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Coral Condition Flat
    The Western Atlantic Health and Resilience Cards provide photographic examples of the dominant habitat features and biological indicators of coral reef condition, health and resilience to future perturbations. Representative examples of benthic substrates types, indicators of coral health, algal functional groups, dominant sessile invertebrates, large, motile invertebrates, and herbivorous and predatory fishes are presented, with emphasis on major functional groups regulating coral diversity, abundance and condition. This is not intended as a taxonomic ID guide. Resilience is the ability of the reef community to maintain or restore structure and function and remain in an equivalent ‘phase’ as before an unusual disturbance. The most critical attributes of resilience for monitoring programs are compiled in this guide. A typical protocol involves an assessment of replicate belt transects in multiple reef environments to characterize 1) the diversity, abundance, size structure cover and condition of corals, 2) the abundance/cover of other associated and competing benthic organisms, including “pest” species; 3) fish diversity, abundance and size for the key functional groups (avoiding many of the small blennies, gobies, wrasses, juveniles and non‐reef species, and focusing on large herbivores, piscivores, invertebrate feeders, and detritivores); 4) abundance of motile macroinvertebrates that feed on algae and invertebrates, especially corallivores; 5) habitat quality and substrate condition (biomass and cover of five functional algal groups, turf, CCA, macroalgae, erect corallines and cyanobacteria; amount of rubble, pavement and sediment); 6) coral condition (prevalence of disease and corallivores, broken corals, levels of recruitment); and 7) evidence of human disturbance such as levels and types of fishing, runoff, and coastal development.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Miami US Department of Commerce Miami-Dade County
    Fisheries assessment of Biscayne Bay 1983 Item Type monograph Authors Berkeley, Steven A. Publisher NOAA/National Ocean Service Download date 01/10/2021 13:52:32 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/30510 NOAA/University of Miami Joint Publication NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS CCMA 166 University of Miami RSMAS TR 2004-01 Coastal and Estuarine Data Archaeology and Rescue Program University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science February 2004 Miami, FL US Department of Commerce Miami-Dade County National Oceanic and Atmospheric Department of Environmental Administration Resources Management Silver Spring, MD Miami, FL a NOAA/University of Miami Joint Publication NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS CCMA 166 University of Miami RSMAS TR TR 2004-01 Fisheries Assessment of Biscayne Bay 1983 Steven A. Berkeley Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami Prepared for: Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management A. Y. Cantillo NOAA National Ocean Service (Editor, 2004) February 2004 United States National Oceanic and Department of Commerce Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Donald L. Evans Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. Jamison S. Hawkins Secretary Vice-Admiral (Ret.), Acting Assistant Administrator Administrator For further information please call or write: NOAA National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science 1305 East West Hwy. Silver Spring, MD 20910 301 713 3020 COVER PHOTO: Pat Cope (Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science) interviewing a fisherman on the causeway leading to Miami Beach during the fisheries assessment. Photograph taken by Stephen Carney while at the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami.
    [Show full text]
  • Hogfish U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, Puerto Rico Handline, Spear
    AND Hogfish Lachnolaimus maximus ©Diane Rome Peebles U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, Puerto Rico Handline, Spear September 5, 2017 The Safina Center Seafood Analysts Disclaimer Seafood Watch and The Safina Center strive to ensure that all our Seafood Reports and recommendations contained therein are accurate and reflect the most up-to-date evidence available at the time of publication. All our reports are peer-reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science or aquaculture.Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch program or of The Safina Center or their recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists.Seafood Watch and The Safina Center are solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. We always welcome additional or updated data that can be used for the next revision. Seafood Watch and Seafood Reports are made possible through a grant from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and other funders. Seafood Watch Standard used in this assessment: Standard for Fisheries vF2 1 Table of Contents About. The. Safina. Center. 3. About. Seafood. .Watch . 4. Guiding. .Principles . 5. Summary. 6. Final. Seafood. .Recommendations . 7. Introduction. 9. Assessment. 11. Criterion. 1:. .Impacts . on. the. species. .under . .assessment . .11 . Criterion. 2:. .Impacts . on. other. .species . .18 . Criterion. 3:. .Management . Effectiveness. .31 . Criterion. 4:. .Impacts . on. the. habitat. and. .ecosystem . .45 . Acknowledgements. 50. References. 51. Appendix. A:. Extra. .By . Catch. .Species . 67. Appendix. B:. Review. Schedule. 89. 2 About The Safina Center The Safina Center (formerly Blue Ocean Institute) translates scientific information into language people can understand and serves as a unique voice of hope, guidance, and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage Snappers in Shallow, Nearshore Seagrass Beds in the Middle Florida Keys
    Preliminary Observations of Abundance and Distribution of Settlement- Stage Snappers in Shallow, Nearshore Seagrass Beds in the Middle Florida Keys Claudine T. Bartels and Karole L. Ferguson SEDAR64-RD-06 June 2019 Preliminary Observations of Abundance and Distribution of Settlement-Stage Snappers in Shallow, Nearshore Seagrass Beds in the Middle Florida Keys CLAUDINE T. BARTELS and KAROLE L. FERGUSON Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 119 Marathon, Florida 33050 USA ABSTRACT Reef-dwelling snappers support valuable commercial and recreational fisheries. Snappers have been reported to use seagrass habitat as a primary nursery area in south Florida waters, although it is still largely unknown where newly recruited and early-juvenile stages of snappers are settling in the waters of the Florida Keys. Previous studies largely have been unsuccessful in locating and collecting these young-of-the-year fishes in seagrass beds. In order to determine the feasibility of collecting early-life stages of snappers in shallow (< 1.3m depth), nearshore seagrass beds and to describe snapper abundance and distribution, we conducted a six-month (June through Novem- ber 2003), stratified-random-design pilot study using 21 m seines on the Atlantic side of the Middle Keys. We collected relatively high numbers of snappers (n = 363), of which more than half were settlement-stage individuals, including 69 new recruits (< 20 mm SL) and 131 early-stage juveniles (> 20 and < 40 mm SL). Mean standard length overall was 36 mm. The most abundant snapper collected was Lutjanus griseus. Snappers recruited consis- tently during the sampling period, and abundance did not significantly differ between months.
    [Show full text]
  • Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae) Associated with Venezuelan Marine Fishes (Elasmobranchii, Actinopterygii)
    Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae) associated with Venezuelan marine fishes (Elasmobranchii, Actinopterygii) Lucy Bunkley-Williams,1 Ernest H. Williams, Jr.2 & Abul K.M. Bashirullah3 1 Caribbean Aquatic Animal Health Project, Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 9012, Mayagüez, PR 00861, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 908, Lajas, Puerto Rico 00667, USA; ewil- [email protected] 3 Instituto Oceanografico de Venezuela, Universidad de Oriente, Cumaná, Venezuela. Author for Correspondence: LBW, address as above. Telephone: 1 (787) 832-4040 x 3900 or 265-3837 (Administrative Office), x 3936, 3937 (Research Labs), x 3929 (Office); Fax: 1-787-834-3673; [email protected] Received 01-VI-2006. Corrected 02-X-2006. Accepted 13-X-2006. Abstract: The parasitic isopod fauna of fishes in the southern Caribbean is poorly known. In examinations of 12 639 specimens of 187 species of Venezuelan fishes, the authors found 10 species in three families of isopods (Gnathiids, Gnathia spp. from Diplectrum radiale*, Heteropriacanthus cruentatus*, Orthopristis ruber* and Trachinotus carolinus*; two aegids, Rocinela signata from Dasyatis guttata*, H. cruentatus*, Haemulon auro- lineatum*, H. steindachneri* and O. ruber; and Rocinela sp. from Epinephelus flavolimbatus*; five cymothoids: Anilocra haemuli from Haemulon boschmae*, H. flavolineatum* and H. steindachneri*; Anilocra cf haemuli from Heteropriacanthus cruentatus*; Haemulon bonariense*, O. ruber*, Cymothoa excisa in H. cruentatus*; Cymothoa oestrum in Chloroscombrus chrysurus, H. cruentatus* and Priacanthus arenatus; Cymothoa sp. in O. ruber; Livoneca sp. from H. cruentatus*; and Nerocila fluviatilis from H. cruentatus* and P. arenatus*). The Rocinela sp. and A.
    [Show full text]