The Ukrainian Weekly 2004, No.20
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Title of Thesis: ABSTRACT CLASSIFYING BIAS
ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis Directed By: Dr. David Zajic, Ph.D. Our project extends previous algorithmic approaches to finding bias in large text corpora. We used multilingual topic modeling to examine language-specific bias in the English, Spanish, and Russian versions of Wikipedia. In particular, we placed Spanish articles discussing the Cold War on a Russian-English viewpoint spectrum based on similarity in topic distribution. We then crowdsourced human annotations of Spanish Wikipedia articles for comparison to the topic model. Our hypothesis was that human annotators and topic modeling algorithms would provide correlated results for bias. However, that was not the case. Our annotators indicated that humans were more perceptive of sentiment in article text than topic distribution, which suggests that our classifier provides a different perspective on a text’s bias. CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Gemstone Honors Program, University of Maryland, 2018 Advisory Committee: Dr. David Zajic, Chair Dr. Brian Butler Dr. Marine Carpuat Dr. Melanie Kill Dr. Philip Resnik Mr. Ed Summers © Copyright by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang 2018 Acknowledgements We would like to express our sincerest gratitude to our mentor, Dr. -
The Ambiguities of Soviet “Piedmonts”: Soviet Borderland
THE AMBIGUITIES OF SOVIET “PIEDMONTS”: SOVIET BORDERLAND POLICIES IN THE UKRAINIAN SSR AND THE MOLDOVAN ASSR, 1922-1934 Alexandr Voronovici A DISSERTATION in History Presented to the Faculties of the Central European University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Budapest, Hungary 2016 CEU eTD Collection Supervisor: Professor Alexei Miller ii Copyright in the text of this dissertation rests with the author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained by the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copied made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. I hereby declare that this dissertation contains no materials accepted for any other degrees and no materials previously written and/or published by another person unless otherwise noted. CEU eTD Collection iii Abstract The dissertation analyzes Soviet borderland policies in the Ukrainian SSR and the Moldovan ASSR in the 1920s and early 1930s. Adopting the situational approach, I explore the Soviet struggle for borderlands on the Western border and the role of the cross-border cultural ties in it. The dissertation argues that the negotiations, different interpretations and the interplay between actors on both sides of the Soviet Western border influenced and framed the evolution of borderland policies in the Ukrainian SSR and the Moldovan ASSR in 1920s. Although, the Soviet Union was a centralized state with a disciplined party, there was still considerable space for conflicting interpretations of Moscow's directives and the promotion of personal agenda by Soviet leaders and activists. -
I from KAMCHATKA to GEORGIA the BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT
FROM KAMCHATKA TO GEORGIA THE BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT AND EARLY SOVIET SPATIAL PRACTICE by Robert F. Crane B.A., Georgia State University, 2001 M.A., University of Pittsburgh, 2005 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2013 i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DEITRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Robert F. Crane It was defended on March 27, 2013 and approved by Atillio Favorini, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts Kathleen George, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts Vladimir Padunov, PhD, Professor, Slavic Languages and Literature Dissertation Advisor: Bruce McConachie, PhD, Professor, Theatre Arts ii Copyright © by Robert Crane 2013 iii FROM KAMCHATKA TO GEORGIA THE BLUE BLOUSE MOVEMENT AND EARLY SOVIET SPATIAL PRACTICE Robert Crane, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2013 The Blue Blouse movement (1923-1933) organized thousands of workers into do-it-yourself variety theatre troupes performing “living newspapers” that consisted of topical sketches, songs, and dances at workers’ clubs across the Soviet Union. At its peak the group claimed more than 7,000 troupes and 100,000 members. At the same time that the movement was active, the Soviet state and its citizens were engaged in the massive project of building a new society reflecting the aims of the Revolution. As Vladimir Paperny has argued, part of this new society was a new spatial organization, one that stressed the horizontal over the -
Collected Works of VI Lenin
W O R K E R S O F A L L C O U N T R I E S , U N I T E! L E N I N COLLECTED WORKS 44 A THE RUSSIAN EDITION WAS PRINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A DECISION OF THE NINTH CONGRESS OF THE R.C.P.(B.) AND THE SECOND CONGRESS OF SOVIETS OF THE U.S.S.R. ИНCTИTУT МАРÇCИзМА — ЛЕНИНИзМА пpи ЦK KНCC B. n. l d H n H С О Ч И Н E Н И Я И з д a н u е ч е m в е p m o e ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ ИЗДАТЕЛЬСТВО ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ M О С К В А V. I. L E N I N cOLLEcTED WORKS VOLUME 44 October 1o17–November 1o 20 PROGRESS PUBLISHERS MOSCOW TRANSLATED FROM THE RUSSIAN BY CLEMENS DUTT EDITED BY BERNARD ISAACS From Marx to Mao M L © Digital Reprints 2014 www.marx2mao.com First printing 1970 Second printing 1975 Third printing 1977 10102—213 л беэ объявл. 014 (01)—77 7 C O N T E N T S Page Preface ........................ 35 1917 1. INSTRUCTION TO THE RED GUARD STAFF. October 30 (November 1?) ................... 43 2. TO THE PETROGRAD COMMITTEE OF THE R.S.D.L.P.(B.). November ? (15) .................. 43 3. TO Y. M. SVERDLOV. Not earlier than November 8 (?1) . 44 4. TO THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION OF THE LABOUR PRESS OF AMERICA, FRANCE AND GREAT BRITAIN. November, prior to 10 (?3) ...... 44 5. TO MAJOR-GENERAL S. I. ODINTSOV. November 15 (?8). -
The History of the Family Household Composition and Family Structures Of
This article was downloaded by: [Yuriy Voloshyn] On: 21 August 2014, At: 07:38 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The History of the Family Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rhof20 Household composition and family structures of Ukrainian Cossacks in the second half of the eighteenth century Yuriy Voloshyna a Department of Ukrainian History, Poltava National Pedagogical University, Poltava, Ukraine Published online: 18 Aug 2014. To cite this article: Yuriy Voloshyn (2014): Household composition and family structures of Ukrainian Cossacks in the second half of the eighteenth century, The History of the Family, DOI: 10.1080/1081602X.2014.944552 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2014.944552 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. -
COUNCIL of EUROPE Summer University for Democracy Projects
COUNCIL OF EUROPE Summer University for Democracy 2-6 July 2007, Strasbourg Projects for Europe SYNTHESIS OF PLENARY SESSIONS AND CONFERENCES Yulia Kochneva, Groupe de sociologie politique européenne, The Robert Schuman University, Strasbourg Directorate General of Democracy and Political Affairs Council of Europe, Strasbourg The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily refl ect the offi cial policy of the Council of Europe. All requests concerning the reproduction or translation of all or part of the document should be addressed to the Public Information and Publications Division, Directorate of Communication (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). All other correspondence concerning this publication should be addressed to the Directorate General of Democracy and Political Affairs. Contacts at the Council of Europe: Jean-Louis Laurens Director General of Democracy and Political Affairs E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: + 33(0)3 88 41 20 73 François Friederich Project Co-ordinator E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: + 33 (0)3 90 21 53 02 Claude Bernard Administrative and Financial Assistant E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: + 33 (0)3 88 41 22 75 Natalia Vassioukova Project Assistant e-mail: [email protected] Tel.: + 33 (0)3 90 21 49 54 website: www.coe.int www.coe.int/Schools-Politics © Council of Europe, March 2008 Table of contents I. Introduction: the European project, a project for the future .................................... 5 II. European strategies and national policies: drawing together a common space . ...................................................................................7 A. The genesis of the common European project ............................................................................7 B. -
Teaching Atheism and Religion in the Mari Republic, Russian Federation
FORMS AND METHODS: TEACHING ATHEISM AND RELIGION IN THE MARI REPUBLIC, RUSSIAN FEDERATION by Sonja Christine Luehrmann A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology and History) in the University of Michigan 2009 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Alaina M. Lemon, Chair Professor E. Webb Keane Jr. Professor William G. Rosenberg Associate Professor Douglas T. Northrop © Sonja Christine Luehrmann All rights reserved 2009 In loving-guessing memory of my grandparents, Karl Lührmann (1892-1978) and Käte Lührmann née Emkes (1907-1997), who were, among other things, rural school teachers, and bequeathed me a riddle about what happens to people as they move between ideological systems. ii Acknowledgements On the evening of January 18, 2006, over tea between vespers and the midnight mass in honor of the feast of the Baptism of Christ, the Orthodox priest of one of Marij El’s district centers questioned the visiting German anthropologist about her views on intellectual influence. “You have probably read all three volumes of Capital, in the original?” – Some of it, I cautiously admitted. “Do you think Marx wrote it himself?” – I said that I supposed so. “And I tell you, it was satan who wrote it through his hand.” I remember making a feeble defense in the name of interpretative charity, saying that it seemed safer to assume that human authors were capable of their own errors, but could not always foresee the full consequences of their ideas. The priest seemed unimpressed, but was otherwise kind enough to sound almost apologetic when he reminded me that as a non-Orthodox Christian, I had to leave the church after the prayers for the catechumens, before the beginning of the liturgy of communion. -
The Oligarchic Democracy. the Influence of Business Groups On
42 THE OLIGARCHIC DEMOCRACY THE INFLUENCE OF BUSINESS GROUPS ON UKRAINIAN POLITICS Sławomir Matuszak NUMBER 42 WARSAW September 2012 THE OLIGARCHIC DEMOCRACY THE INFLUENCE OF BUSINESS GROUPS ON UKRAINIAN POLITICS Sławomir Matuszak © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies Content EDitors Adam Eberhardt, Wojciech Konończuk EDitorS Anna Łabuszewska Katarzyna Kazimierska Translation Ilona Duchnowicz CO-operation Nicholas Furnival Graphic Design Para-buch CHARTS Wojciech Mańkowski PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER Shutterstock DTP GroupMedia Publisher Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-62936-14-4 Contents THESES /5 MAIN SEctORS OF BUSINESS ActIVITY OF THE KEY UKRAINIAN OLIGARCHS /8 INTRODUctION /9 RESERVATIONS /11 I. THE EMERGENCE OF THE OLIGARCHIC SYSTEM AND ITS FORM IN 1991–2004 /13 1. The genesis of the oligarchic system /13 2. The formation of the clans /13 3. The beginnings of a system crisis /17 4. The Orange Revolution /20 II. THE OLIGARCHS IN 2005–2010 /23 1. The orange ‘oligarchic democracy’ /25 1.1. The business circles linked to the Party of Regions /26 1.2. ‘Orange’ business /27 1.3. The others /30 2. Tymoshenko’s conflict with the RUE Group /32 3. The attempt to form a grand coalition /32 4. The presidential election of 2010 /34 III. THE OLIGARCHS AFTER VIKTOR YANUKOVYCH’S VIctORY /37 1. The key groups of influence in the state administration/37 2. ‘The family’ – an attempt at a new quality /40 3. -
Russian Culture at the Crossroads
CULTURE AT THE CROSSROADS PARADOXES OF POSTCOMMUNIST CONSCIOUSNESS edited by Dmitri A? Shalin Intellectual Culture DMITRI N. SHALIN No group cheered louder for Soviet reform, had a bigger stake in pere- stroika, or suffered more in its aftermath than the Russian intelligentsia. Today, nearly a decade after Mikhail Gorbachev unveiled his plan to re- form Soviet society, the mood among Russian intellectuals is decidedly gloomy. "The intelligentsia has carried perestroika on its shoulders," laments Yury Shchekochikhin, a noted commentator. "So why does it feel so forlorn, superfluous, and forgotten?"l Another commentator warns that the intellectual stratum "has become so thin that in three or four years the current genocide against the intelligentsia will surely wipe it out."2 Andrei Bitov, one of the country's finest writers, waxes nostalgic about the Brezhnev era and "the golden years of stagnation when. peo- ple could do something real, like build homes, publish books, and what not.? The frustration and self-doubt afflicting Russian intellectuals today might seem excessive, but they are hardly unprecedented. In the last 150 years or so, every crucial turn in Russian history has touched off a new round of debate about the intelligentsia and its role as the conscience of society and guardian of national culture. This discourse by and about the intelligentsia has shaped the distinct themes, literary props, psychologi- cal traits, and favored political agendas of Russian intellectual culture. Russian intellectual culture shares with its Western counterpart a belief in directed social change and cultural critique as a tool for social reconstruc- tion. East or West, intellectuals produce a "distinctive culture of dis- course,"4 through which they stake their claim to status and income in modern society. -
About Russia, Its Revolutions, Its Development and Its Present and Its Development Its Revolutions, Its Russia, About
Prager Schriften zur Zeitgeschichte 10 Prager Schriften zur Zeitgeschichte und zum Zeitgeschehen 10 und zum Zeitgeschehen 10 Michal Reiman Michal Reiman About Russia, Its Revolutions, Reiman Michal Its Development and Its Present The author analyzes modern Russian established terror as an instrument for About Russia, history from a new perspective. Due to social reorganization. WWII revealed the the ideological heritage of the XIX and XX necessity of a correction of these devel- century, the social settings of the socio- opments, but the events of the Cold War Its Revolutions, political history of the USSR (1917-1945) circumvented any further considerations. have not been fully identified. Detailed examination of ideological and political Its Development concepts shows that the revolution of 1917 became not a middle class, proletarian The Author movement, but rather a plebeian one. The Michal Reiman lectured at the College of and Its Present misjudgment by the new power enabled Political Science in Prague and was Pro- growth but caused tremendous losses of fessor at the Otto Suhr Institute of Political human lives and material damages. So- Science at Freie Universität Berlin and at cialization of economy and strict central- the Institute for International Studies at ization led to a new social structure and Charles University Prague. About Russia, Its Revolutions, Its Development and Its Present and Its Development Its Revolutions, Its Russia, About ISBN 978-3-631-67136-8 Prager Schriften zur Zeitgeschichte 10 Prager Schriften zur Zeitgeschichte und zum Zeitgeschehen 10 und zum Zeitgeschehen 10 Michal Reiman Michal Reiman About Russia, Its Revolutions, Reiman Michal Its Development and Its Present The author analyzes modern Russian established terror as an instrument for About Russia, history from a new perspective. -
Discussing Stalinism
Edited by Markku Kangaspuro and Vesa Oittinen Discussing Stalinism Problems and Approaches Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki 1 DISCUSSING STALINISM Discussing Stalinism: Problems and Approaches Edited by Markku Kangaspuro and Vesa Oittinen © 2015 Aleksanteri Institute © 2015 The authors ISBN 978-951-51-0020-7 Layout Asmo Koste Juvenes Print, Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy Tampere, Finland 2015 Aleksanteri Institute, Helsinki, 2015 2 Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................5 Interpretations of Stalinism: Historiographical Patterns since the 1930s and the Role of the ‘Archival Revolution’ in the 1990s ...............................11 Lennart Samuelson Towards a Neo-Weberian Historical Sociology of Stalinism .........................42 Mikhail Maslovskiy Stalin as ”World Spirit Embodied”: the Hegelian Interpretations of the Phenomenon of Stalinism in Brecht, Lukács and Bukharin ...............57 Vesa Oittinen Stalinism as a Structural Choice of Soviet Society and its Lost Alternatives ..........................................................................................................74 Markku Kangaspuro Young Felix Dzerzhinsky and the Origins of Stalinism ..................................93 Iain Lauchlan Trotsky’s Thermidor Thesis: The Political Form of a Class State. ................114 Carlos Eduardo Rebello de Mendonça Contributors .......................................................................................................122 -
Ukraine's 2002 Elections: Less Fraud, More Virtuality
Ukraine’s 2002 Elections: Less Fraud, More Virtuality Andrew Wilson t the height of the Gongadze affair, in early Table 1: Ukraine’s 2002 Elections 2001, President Leonid Kuchma issued an open invitation to observe the Ukrainian National List Consti- A Party/Bloc List Seats tuencies Total authorities on their best behavior during the upcoming parliamentary elections, set for March 2002. With an Our Ukraine 23.6% 70 42 112 unprecedented number of foreign observers (officially, Communists 20.0% 59 6 65 over a thousand) seeking to test the president’s word, For a United 11.8% 35 66 101 and Western embassies helping to finance a huge exit Ukraine poll on election day,which would make blatant forgery Tymoshenko Bloc 7.3% 22 22 more obvious, any crude use of so-called administrative Socialists 6.9% 20 3 23 resources was unlikely to be as prevalent or have the Social Democratic 6.3% 19 5 24 same effect as it had in the presidential election in 1999 Party (United) or the referendum fiasco of 2000. 4% barrier Accordingly, the parallel count organized by the Vitrenko Bloc 3.2% For Fair Elections committee claimed to detect only Women for 2.1% the Future relatively small divergences from the official results (for these, see Table 1).The committee put Our Ukraine at Winter Crop 2.0% 25.04 percent (up 1.4 percent from the Central Election Communist Party of 1.4% Ukraine (Renewed) Commission’s figure); the Communists at 21.2 percent Green Party 1.3% (up 1.2 percent); For a United Ukraine at 9.4 percent Yabluko 1.2% (down 2.4 percent); the Yuliya Tymoshenko Bloc at 8.6 percent (up 1.3 percent); the Socialists at 7.9 percent (up Unity 1.1% 3 3 Democratic Union/ 0.9% 1 percent); and the Social Democratic Party of Ukraine Democratic Party 4 4 (United) (SDPU[U]) at 6.3 percent (no difference).