IAWA Bulletin 1976-3.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park
Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park Hiltaba Pastoral Lease and Gawler Ranges National Park, South Australia Survey conducted: 12 to 22 Nov 2012 Report submitted: 22 May 2013 P.J. Lang, J. Kellermann, G.H. Bell & H.B. Cross with contributions from C.J. Brodie, H.P. Vonow & M. Waycott SA Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes Bush Blitz – Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges NP, November 2012 Report submitted to Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study: 22 May 2013. Published online on http://data.environment.sa.gov.au/: 25 Nov. 2016. ISBN 978-1-922027-49-8 (pdf) © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resouces, South Australia, 2013. With the exception of the Piping Shrike emblem, images, and other material or devices protected by a trademark and subject to review by the Government of South Australia at all times, this report is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. All other rights are reserved. This report should be cited as: Lang, P.J.1, Kellermann, J.1, 2, Bell, G.H.1 & Cross, H.B.1, 2, 3 (2013). Flora survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park: vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes. Report for Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. (Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia: Adelaide). Authors’ addresses: 1State Herbarium of South Australia, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. -
Supplementary Material Saving Rainforests in the South Pacific
Australian Journal of Botany 65, 609–624 © CSIRO 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT17096_AC Supplementary material Saving rainforests in the South Pacific: challenges in ex situ conservation Karen D. SommervilleA,H, Bronwyn ClarkeB, Gunnar KeppelC,D, Craig McGillE, Zoe-Joy NewbyA, Sarah V. WyseF, Shelley A. JamesG and Catherine A. OffordA AThe Australian PlantBank, The Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Mount Annan, NSW 2567, Australia. BThe Australian Tree Seed Centre, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. CSchool of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia DBiodiversity, Macroecology and Conservation Biogeography Group, Faculty of Forest Sciences, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. EInstitute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222 Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand. FRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Wakehurst Place, RH17 6TN, United Kingdom. GNational Herbarium of New South Wales, The Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia. HCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1 (below) comprises a list of seed producing genera occurring in rainforest in Australia and various island groups in the South Pacific, along with any available information on the seed storage behaviour of species in those genera. Note that the list of genera is not exhaustive and the absence of a genus from a particular island group simply means that no reference was found to its occurrence in rainforest habitat in the references used (i.e. the genus may still be present in rainforest or may occur in that locality in other habitats). As the definition of rainforest can vary considerably among localities, for the purpose of this paper we considered rainforests to be terrestrial forest communities, composed largely of evergreen species, with a tree canopy that is closed for either the entire year or during the wet season. -
Sites of Botanical Significance Vol1 Part1
Plant Species and Sites of Botanical Significance in the Southern Bioregions of the Northern Territory Volume 1: Significant Vascular Plants Part 1: Species of Significance Prepared By Matthew White, David Albrecht, Angus Duguid, Peter Latz & Mary Hamilton for the Arid Lands Environment Centre Plant Species and Sites of Botanical Significance in the Southern Bioregions of the Northern Territory Volume 1: Significant Vascular Plants Part 1: Species of Significance Matthew White 1 David Albrecht 2 Angus Duguid 2 Peter Latz 3 Mary Hamilton4 1. Consultant to the Arid Lands Environment Centre 2. Parks & Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory 3. Parks & Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory (retired) 4. Independent Contractor Arid Lands Environment Centre P.O. Box 2796, Alice Springs 0871 Ph: (08) 89522497; Fax (08) 89532988 December, 2000 ISBN 0 7245 27842 This report resulted from two projects: “Rare, restricted and threatened plants of the arid lands (D95/596)”; and “Identification of off-park waterholes and rare plants of central Australia (D95/597)”. These projects were carried out with the assistance of funds made available by the Commonwealth of Australia under the National Estate Grants Program. This volume should be cited as: White,M., Albrecht,D., Duguid,A., Latz,P., and Hamilton,M. (2000). Plant species and sites of botanical significance in the southern bioregions of the Northern Territory; volume 1: significant vascular plants. A report to the Australian Heritage Commission from the Arid Lands Environment Centre. Alice Springs, Northern Territory of Australia. Front cover photograph: Eremophila A90760 Arookara Range, by David Albrecht. Forward from the Convenor of the Arid Lands Environment Centre The Arid Lands Environment Centre is pleased to present this report on the current understanding of the status of rare and threatened plants in the southern NT, and a description of sites significant to their conservation, including waterholes. -
Report on the Grimwade Plant Collection of Percival St John and Botanical Exploration of Mt Buffalo National Park (Victoria, Australia)
Report on the Grimwade Plant Collection of Percival St John and Botanical Exploration of Mt Buffalo National Park (Victoria, Australia) Alison Kellow Michael Bayly Pauline Ladiges School of Botany, The University of Melbourne July, 2007 THE GRIMWADE PLANT COLLECTION, MT BUFFALO Contents Summary ...........................................................................................................................3 Mt Buffalo and its flora.....................................................................................................4 History of botanical exploration........................................................................................5 The Grimwade plant collection of Percival St John..........................................................8 A new collection of plants from Mt Buffalo - The Miegunyah Plant Collection (2006/2007) ....................................................................................................................................13 Plant species list for Mt Buffalo National Park...............................................................18 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................19 Acknowledgments...........................................................................................................19 References .......................................................................................................................20 Appendix 1 Details of specimens in the Grimwade Plant Collection.............................22 -
Muelleria 28-1 Text.Indd
A new species of Leptostigma (Rubiaceae: Coprosminae) and notes on the Coprosminae in Australia Ian R. Thompson National Herbarium of Victoria, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Birdwood Avenue, South Yarra, 3141, Australia; School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction Abstract Subtribe Coprosminae (Rubiaceae: tribe Anthospermeae) was erected by A new species of Leptostigma Fosberg (1982) to distinguish a relatively uniform morphological group Arn. (Rubiaceae: Coprosminae), L. breviflorum I.Thomps., is described placed among a broadly distributed and heterogeneous assemblage from Victoria, Australia and compared of genera. The Coprosminae has a trans-Pacific distribution, occuring to L. reptans (F.Muell.) Fosberg. A in Australia, New Zealand, New Caledonia, Hawaii, Central America and key to Australian genera in the South America. Its make-up has undergone several modifications since Coprosminae and a revised key to its erection, and is now thought to comprise five genera, Coprosma Coprosma J.R.Forst. & G.Forst. in Australia are presented. Distribution J.R.Forst. & G.Forst., Durringtonia R.J.Hend. & Guymer, Leptostigma Arn., maps and nomenclatural information Nertera Banks & Sol. ex Gaertn., and Normandia Hook.f. Fosberg (1982) are presented for all species in the indicated that the Coprosminae were distinguished from the remainder Coprosminae in Australia, including of the Anthospermeae by drupaceous fruits containing a pair, usually, those in Leptostigma, Coprosma, of planoconvex pyrenes and a basal attachment of ovules. Pomax Sol. Nertera Banks & Sol. ex Gaertn. and ex DC. and Opercularia Gaertn. are the two Australian genera in the Durringtonia R.J.Hend. -
Glycosides in the Rubiaceae*
The occurrence of asperulosidic glycosides in the Rubiaceae* P. Kooiman Laboratorium voor Algemene en Technische Biologie Technische Hogeschool, Delft. SUMMARY Some properties of the new iridoid compounds Galium glucoside and Gardenia glucoside are described. Galium glucoside and asperuloside occurin many species belongingto the Rubioideae (sensu Bremekamp); they were not found in other subfamilies of the Rubiaceae. Gardenia glucoside occurs in several species ofthe tribe Gardenieae (subfamily Ixoroideae). The distribution of the asperulosidic glucosides in the Rubiaceae corresponds with the classi- fication proposed by Bremekamp, although there are some exceptions (Hamelieae, Opercu- laria and Pomax, possibly the Gaertnereae). To a somewhat less degreethe system proposedby Verdcourt is supported. 1. INTRODUCTION Apart from the classification arrived at by Bremekamp (1966) the only other modern system of the Rubiaceae was proposed by Verdcourt (1958); both au- thors considered their classifications tentative. The have several fea- as systems tures in common, but deviate in some points. The main differences are in the po- sition ofthe Urophylloideae sensu Bremekamp, which are included in the subfa- mily Rubioideaeby Verdcourt, and in the relationship between the Cinchonoideae the Ixoroideae and (both sensu Bremekamp) which are united in the subfamily Cinchonoideae by Verdcourt. Both systems diverge widely and principally from all older classifications which appeared to become more and more unsatis- factory as the number of described species increased. In 1954 Briggs & Nicholes reported on the presence or absence of the iridoid glucoside asperuloside (1) in most species of Coprosma and in many other Rubiaceae. The reaction they used for the detection of asperuloside is now known to be not specific for this glucoside; it detects in addition some struc- turally and most probably biogenetically related glycosides. -
Position, (Botanical Museum and Herbarium, Utrecht) Played an Important Part in the Rubiaceae, Belong the of Pluriovular Cells
Acta Botanica Neerlandica 15 (1966) 1-33 Remarks on the position, the delimitation and the subdivision of the Rubiaceae C.E.B. Bremekamp (Botanical Museum and Herbarium, Utrecht) (received October 22nd, 1965) Introduction It is often assumed that the delimitation and the subdivision of the various families which have been distinguished in the Angiosperms, do offer serious no longer difficulties. They would belong to those of for which objects study already long ago a fairly satisfactory so- found. If wish be with this lution was we to acquainted solution, the would have would be look such works only thing we to do, to up as Benthamand Hooker’s “Genera Plantarum” and Engler and Brand's “Nattirliche Pflanzenfamilien”. Some improvements might still be but these would be of minor desirable, importance only. These as- be sumptions, however, are to regarded as dangerous illusions. That the very serious nature of the shortcomings found in the delimitation and subdivision of these families, especially of the larger ones, is so often overlooked, is apparently due to an attitude of mind which is observed in of a comparatively large part the taxonomists, viz. a lack of interest in the development of a truly natural classi- fication. This is not incomprehensible. Most of them spend the major part of their time in the elaboration of floras covering areas of more but of or less limited extent, and they are rarely aware the fact that the the which is in knowledge of families obtained this way, remains in necessarily incomplete. Moreover, the elaboration of a flora the most essential point is the construction of serviceable keys to the species as well as to the groups of higher rank, not the exact deli- mitation of these the latter end material is groups; to usually more than the of flora has required compiler a at his disposition. -
A SURVEY of the SYSTEMATIC WOOD ANATOMY of the RUBIACEAE by Steven Jansen1, Elmar Robbrecht2, Hans Beeckman3 & Erik Smets1
IAWA Journal, Vol. 23 (1), 2002: 1–67 A SURVEY OF THE SYSTEMATIC WOOD ANATOMY OF THE RUBIACEAE by Steven Jansen1, Elmar Robbrecht2, Hans Beeckman3 & Erik Smets1 SUMMARY Recent insight in the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae, mainly based on macromolecular data, agrees better with wood anatomical diversity patterns than previous subdivisions of the family. The two main types of secondary xylem that occur in Rubiaceae show general consistency in their distribution within clades. Wood anatomical characters, espe- cially the fibre type and axial parenchyma distribution, have indeed good taxonomic value in the family. Nevertheless, the application of wood anatomical data in Rubiaceae is more useful in confirming or negating already proposed relationships rather than postulating new affinities for problematic taxa. The wood characterised by fibre-tracheids (type I) is most common, while type II with septate libriform fibres is restricted to some tribes in all three subfamilies. Mineral inclusions in wood also provide valuable information with respect to systematic re- lationships. Key words: Rubiaceae, systematic wood anatomy, classification, phylo- geny, mineral inclusions INTRODUCTION The systematic wood anatomy of the Rubiaceae has recently been investigated by us and has already resulted in contributions on several subgroups of the family (Jansen et al. 1996, 1997a, b, 1999, 2001; Lens et al. 2000). The present contribution aims to extend the wood anatomical observations to the entire family, surveying the second- ary xylem of all woody tribes on the basis of literature data and original observations. Although Koek-Noorman contributed a series of wood anatomical studies to the Rubiaceae in the 1970ʼs, there are two principal reasons to present a new and com- prehensive overview on the wood anatomical variation. -
Wo 2009/125017 A2
(12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date 15 October 2009 (15.10.2009) WO 2009/125017 A2 (51) International Patent Classification: (FR). CAMPA, Claudine [FR/FR]; 4 rue des Lavandes, C07H 7/06 (2006.01) A61K 8/49 (2006.01) F-34820 Teyran (FR). C07H 1/08 (2006.01) A61K 127/00 (2006.01) (74) Agents: TOUATI, Catherine et al; Cabinet Plasseraud, A61K 31/7048 (2006.01) A61P 17/00 (2006.01) 52 rue de Ia Victoire, F-75440 Paris Cedex 09 (FR). A61P3/10 (2006.01) A61P 37/08 (2006.01) A61K 36/74 (2006.01) A61Q 19/00 (2006.01) (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 8/97 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, (21) International Application Number: CA, CH, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, PCT/EP2009/054349 EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, (22) International Filing Date: HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, 10 April 2009 (10.04.2009) KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, (25) Filing Language: English NZ, OM, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, (26) Publication Language: English SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. -
Vegetation Book Plant Descriptions
Part Three Plant Descriptions Page 187 Page 188 Information about the plant Profiles). descriptions • Site preference: Describes the preference of the plant to such things as soil types, This section contains information about selected moisture, aspect, etc. plant species that are found in the Border Rivers - Gwydir catchment. Most of the species • Habit: Describes what the plant looks like, described relate to those that are highlighted such as flower colour, growth form, bark in bold in Part Two: Vegetation Profiles. colour and texture, etc. They represent the species that are of special interest, or those that are of use for revegetation • Flowering: Time of year you would expect purposes. As a total list of plant species for each to see the plant flowering. landform is too large to be accommodated in the • Seed collection: How or when to collect Vegetation Profiles, there may be some species seeds for propagation. described in this section that have not been listed there. The plant descriptions do not describe all • Propagation: Notes the easiest method the plant species that grow in the Border Rivers of propagation, i.e. growing from seed, -Gwydir catchment, because the list would be cuttings, etc. Also see Appendix One for too large. For information on plants that are not further information. described in this section, see the bibliography • Rainfall: Average annual rainfall of the following the plant descriptions (p 277). species’ natural range. Interpreting the descriptions • Values and uses: Lists the species’usefulness, including palatability for livestock, use for The species are listed alphabetically using timber, wildlife habitat, etc. -
Phylogeny and Classification of the Subfamily Rubioideae (Rubiaceae)
Plant Syst. Evol. 225:43-72 (2000) Plant Systematics and Evolution © Springer-Verlag 2000 Printed in Austria Phylogeny and classification of the subfamily Rubioideae (Rubiaceae) B. Bremer 1 and J.-F. Manen 2 1Department of Systematic Botany, EBC, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 2Universit6 de Gen6ve, Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques, Chamb&y, Switzerland Received April 27, 1999 Accepted June 21, 2000 Abstract. We performed phylogenetic analyses of Progress in understanding of the subfamily the subfamily Rubioideae (Rubiaceae) based on Rubioideae of the Rubiaceae is relatively three different pieces of chloroplast DNA, the recent and includes many important contribu- protein coding rbcL gene, the spacer sequence tions from many different scientists. Before the between atpB and rbcL (atpB-rbcL), and the recently middle of the 20th century the "Rubioideae" published (Andersson and Rova 1999) rpsl6 intron taxa were dispersed in the two subfamilies data. New rbcL sequences have been produced for Coffeoideae and Cinchonoideae, a classifica- 41 taxa and there are 52 new atpB-rbcL spacer sequences. All analyses gave similar results concern- tion of the Rubiaceae based on ovule number ing the phylogeny, but they differ slightly in reso- (Schumann 1891). Bremekamp (1952, 1954) lution and support for the various branches. The and Verdcourt (1958) argued against this minor tribes Ophiorrhizeae, Urophylleae, Lasian- artificial division of the family and instead theae, and Coussareeae form a grade to the rest of proposed that all Rubiaceae tribes with species the subfamily, which consists of two well-supported containing raphides (calcium oxalate crystals) branches, the Psychotrieae alliance and the Sper- should be set aside as a new subfamily, macoceae alliance, including a majority of all genera Rubioideae. -
Razafimandimbison & Rydin 2019
Razafimandimbison & Rydin • Phylogeny and classification of Ophiorrhizeae (Rubiaceae) TAXON 68 (1) • February 2019: 72–91 SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY Molecular-based assessments of tribal and generic limits and relationships in Rubiaceae (Gentianales): Polyphyly of Pomazoteae and paraphyly of Ophiorrhizeae and Ophiorrhiza Sylvain G. Razafimandimbison1 & Catarina Rydin2,3 1 Department of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 10405 Stockholm, Sweden 2 Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden 3 The Bergius Foundation, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 10405 Stockholm, Sweden Address for correspondence: Sylvain G. Razafimandimbison, [email protected] DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12023 Abstract Circumscriptions of the Australasian tribes Ophiorrhizeae and Pomazoteae (Rubiaceae) as well as their generic relationships and limits have long remained unsettled. These tribes were originally delimited by Bremekamp based on the lack of raphides and testa cell patterns (thick- versus thin-walled testa cells, respectively). Some authors have synonymized the two or treated Pomazoteae as a syn- onym of other tribes despite the fact that the matter has never been sufficiently addressed. We performed molecular phylogenetic analyses of Ophiorrhizeae sensu Bremer & Manen (i.e., comprising Coptophyllum, Lerchea, Neurocalyx, Ophiorrhiza, Spiradiclis and Xanthophytum) based on sequence data from four plastid and two nuclear markers. Coptophyllum (= Pomazota, type of Pomazoteae), Lerchea and Xanthophytum together with seven other genera, were traditionally classified in Pomazoteae. We also investigated for the first time the two Pomazoteae genera Keenania and Leptomischus. Our analyses resolved Leptomischus as sister to the Rubioideae tribe Argostemmateae and we here formally classify this genus in that tribe.