DOCSLIB.ORG

Citizens' Action Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

-- r TRI -STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGN THE TRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGN The Tri-State Transportation Campaign is a coalition offourteen environmental andpublic interest organizations in the New York / New Jersey / Connecticut metropolitan region. Connecticut Fund for the Environment. New Haven, CT 1032 Chapel Street /06510/ (203) 787-0646/ fax (203) 787-0246 • Contacts: Don Strait, Michael Stern Environmental Advocates • Albany, NY 353 Hamilton Street / 12210/ (518) 462-5526 / fax (518 ) 427-0381 • Contacts: Lee Wasserman, Loretta Simon Environmental Defense Fund. New York, NY 257 Park Avenue South /10010/ (212) 505-2100 / fax (212) 505-2375. Contact: James TB. Tripp Brian Ketcham Engineering, P.C.• Brooklyn, NY 175 Pacific Street / 11201 / (718) 330-0550 / fax (718) 330-0582 • Contact: Brian Ketcham KomanoffEnergy Associates. New York, NY 270 Lafayette Street, Room 400 / 10012/ (212) 334-9767/ fax (212) 925-2151 • Contact: Charles Komanoff Natural Resources Defense Council. New York, NY 40 West 20th Street / 10011 / (212) 727-4454/ fax (212) 727-1773 • Contact: Richard Kassel New Jersey Environmental Lobby. Trenton, NJ 204 West State Street! 08608 / (609) 396-3774 / fax (609) 396-4521 • Contact: Marie Curtis New Jersey Public Interest Research Group. Trenton, NJ 11 North Willow Street / 08608 / (609) 394-8155 / fax (609) 989-9013 • Contact: Drew Kodjak New York City Environmental Justice Alliance. New York, NY 271 West 125th Street, Room 303 / 10027/ (212) 866-4120/ fax (212) 866-4511 • Contact: Michelle DePass Regional Plan Association. New York, NY 570 Lexington Avenue, 20th floor / 10022 / (212) 980-8530 / fax (212) 980-8632 • Contact: Jeffrey Zupan Rutgers Environmental Law Clinic. Newark, NJ 15 Washington St. / 07102 / (201) 648-5695 / fax (201) 648-1249. Contacts: Ed Lloyd, Bill Sullivan, Therese Langer Scenic Hudson, Inc.• Poughkeepsie, NY 9 Vassar Street! 12601 / (914) 473-4440 / fax (914) 473-2648. Contact: Carol Sondheimer Straphangers 'Campaign / NYPIRG • New York, NY 9 Murray Street / 10007 / (212) 349-6460/ fax (212) 349-1366 • Contact: Gene Russianoff Transportation Alternatives. New York, NY 92 St. Marks Place/ 10009/ (212) 475-4600 / fax (212) 475-4551 • Contact: John Kaehny TRI-STATE TRANSPORTATION CAMPAIGN 281 Park Avenue South, Second Floor /10010 / (212) 777-8181/ fax (212) 777-8157 Contacts: Janine Bauer, executive director; Jon Orcutt, associate director; James T.B. Tripp, board chair. The Tri-State Transportation Campaign's CITIZENS ACTION PLAN A 21st Century Transportation System A Vision of Our Region's Land, Cities and Communities Table of Contents Chapter 1 / Introduction and Executive Summary 1 Chapter 2 I What Needs Fixing ......... .. .................. .. 6 A. Economic Damage from Our Transportation System ........... .. 6 B. Environmental Damage from Our Transportation System. .. ... .. 16 l C. Social Damage from Our Transportation System 20 D. Drivers Don't Pay Their Way 24 E. Transportation Agencies Are Failing Us 26 Chapter 3 I Policies for a New Transportation Future. ......... .. .. 30 Chapter 4 I Transit Improvements for Our Region .. .... ...... 34 A. Maintain, Repair and Improve the Physical System 35 B. Tie the Transit Systems Together 36 C. Expand the Transit System and Services to Serve Travelers Better.. 37 D. Strengthen Rail Freight .............................. .. 44 Chapter 5 I Improving Personal Travel - Driving, Walking and Cycling. 48 A. New Options for Short Trips 48 B. Making our Automobile Infrastructure Work Better 51 C. Economic Incentives to Use Roads More Efficiently. 55 D. Effect of Tran sportation Demand Measures on VMT Reduction .. .. 64 Chapter 6 I Land Use Mea sures to Promote Center-Oriented Development and Protect Open Space . ............................ .. 68 A. Linking Transportation and Land Use Planning 68 B. Other Measures to Improve Land Use and Community Planning 70 Chapter 7 / Call to Action 74 A. Businesses and Employers . .......... .. .. .. .. ...... .. 74 . B. Land Developers 75 C. Automobile Users. ................................. .. 75 D. State Legislators and Governors . ....................... .. 76 E. Transportation Planners and Providers . .. ........... ..... .. 78 F. State Environmental Agencies 81 G. Local Government 81 Appendix 1 / New Highway Capacity Being Built or Actively Planned in the Tn-State Region . ......... .......... ...... .. .. 83 Appendix 2/ New Public Transportation for Our Region 86 A. Measures to Interconnect the Region's Rail Network 86 B. Measures to Improve Rail Access To Major Destinations 90 C. Suburban Transit via New Circumferential Rail Service 92 Appendix 3 / Estimating The Effects of Transportation Management Strat- egies for the New York/New Jersey/ Connecticut Metropolitan Region. 94 Endnotes .. ............ ... .... ... ................ 99 Chapter 1 / Introduction and Executive Summary Transportation. It affects so much of our lives. More and more, it has come to shape our lives, and to dictate to us: How we get to work in the morning and whether we're on time . Whether we're out of work because we don't have a car and can't get to jobs that left our cities and moved to office parks in the suburbs. Whether traffic tie-ups have led us to cut down on visiting friends and family. Why reliable and efficient rail can't move goods now shipped by truck . Whether the day-care center will close before the traffic jam ends.How our teenagers will get to and from their after-school activities or part-time jobs. Whether our aging relatives can get to the grocery store, the pharmacy and the doctor. Transportation should serve us, not limit us. Our future on many fronts ­ clean air, an educated workforce, a competitive marketplace, land preservation and opportunities for recreation, national energy independence - is slipping away. Our unsatisfactory transportation choices are partly to blame. If we do not begin to shape our transportation destiny differently, things will get worse. The Tri-State Transportation Campaign thinks we deserve better in our 32­ county, three-state region. We envision a region in which lack of an automo­ bile will limit no one's opportunities, in which city and town centers thrive and open spaces remain intact, in which those who choose to walk or bicycle to their destinations will find safe and pleasant routes, where the air is fit to breathe and businesses and individuals are not taxed daily by congestion and system failure. Our aim is an environmentally sound, economically efficient, and equitable transportation system. The Tri-State Transportation Campaign aims to mobilize the region to de­ mand change. Together, in the next three to five years, citizens in the New York/New Jersey/Connecticut tri-state region have the power to begin restruc­ turing transportation policy, infrastructure and choices. The Campaign will employ constituency-building, technical analysis and legal advocacy to begin turning around seventy years of excessive road-building, loss of open space, suburban sprawl and urban decay. 1 Chapter 1 / Introduction And Executive Summary Two new federal laws have helped throw open this window of opportu­ The Trl·State Region nity. The Clean Air Act Amend­ The Tri-State Transportation Cam­ ments of 1990 require an unprece­ paign defines the greater New York dented cleanup of our dirty air, to be metropolitan region in its most expan­ sive form - 32 counties stretching completed by 2007. Because of air from Ocean County, NJ in the south, pollution's ongoing damage to pub­ to Hunterdon and Warren Counties, NJ In the west, Sullivan and Ulster lic health, with frightening increases Counties, NY in the northwest, and in asthma and other lung disease, the litchfield and Hartford Counties, CT law stipulates year-by-year dead­ in the Northeast (see map, next page). At times in this Plan, statistics lines, with stiff penalties for non­ are given for slightly different regional compliance. Similarly, the re­ configurations, due to data limitations. vamped highway funding law, known as ISTEA (the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991), gives states and localities the power to decide how to invest federal transportation dollars. Public involve­ ment in guiding these expenditures - $20 billion in our region between now and 1997 - could pay enormous dividends in economic efficiency, social justice and quality of life. What will the future of transportation look like physically? If we succeed in capping and reducing vehicular travel, we won't need to expand highways. Instead, we can create a much more varied transportation system. One with new and better transit options for suburbs as well as central cities. New and improved inter-suburban and reverse-commute rail. Bus and van routes with frequent, reliable service in low-density areas. More ferries. A regional transit fare card. Instant access to transit and traffic information by telephone, televi­ sion or computer. Communities with town centers and conveniences that won't require separate auto trips to reach child care, dry cleaning and food shopping. There's more . Extensive and frequent subway and light rail service through­ out our core. Rail freight to carry many more goods. Rail access to our air­ ports. No more vast parking lots for development and employment centers. Developers to have strong incentives, and in some cases requirements, to pro­ vide access by transit. Lanes set aside for safe passage of bicyclists, space to 2 Chapter 1 / Introduction And Executive Sununary load bikes on trains and buses, and
Recommended publications
  • 1 of 1 Forecast of Contracts to Be Advertised and Proposals to Be Solicited

    1 of 1 Forecast of Contracts to Be Advertised and Proposals to Be Solicited

    Welcome to the latest MTA "Eye on the Future," in which we present currently funded capital projects that are planned to be advertised from September 2017 through August 2018. The "Eye" is hosted along with other information and resources about the MTA Capital Program in one convenient location. It is part of our commitment to improve business practices and we hope that it is useful to you. The MTA Capital Program is very important for the safety and reliability of the MTA transportation system and is vital for the regional economy. As described in this issue of the "Eye," the MTA is preparing to undertake 145 projects valued at approximately $4.71 billion in capital work. This work spans many areas, including civil, structural, and electrical, as well as new technologies. These projects are crucial for the reliability, growth and resiliency of the system and contribute to the regional economy. This amount of investment is projected to generate approximately $8.29 billion in economic activity for the New York region. We want to make sure you’re aware of our recently-launched web-portal: MyMTA.info. This portal enables suppliers and bidders to the MTA to search procurement opportunities and information across all MTA agencies, respond to sourcing events online, select categories for the goods and services your sell and more. Contractors and suppliers have a critical stake in the success of the Capital Program. We appreciate your interest in and support of the projects included in this issue of the "Eye," and we look forward to your participation.
  • April 2004 Bulletin.Pub

    April 2004 Bulletin.Pub

    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - APRIL, 2004 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 47, No. 4 April, 2004 The Bulletin NYC TRANSIT’S REHABILITATION PROGRAM Published by the New While surfing the Internet, our Production ADA ACCESSIBILITY — JUNCTION BOULEVARD York Division, Electric Manager found a list of proposed new con- STATION: Three ADA compliant elevators will Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box tracts. The following are of interest to our be installed at the Junction Boulevard station 3001, New York, New readers: on the Flushing Line. Platform edge modifica- York 10008-3001. NEW SOUTH FERRY TERMINAL: NYC Transit tions and warning strips will be provided. would like to build a new station to replace ADA-required signage and an automated For general inquiries, the century-old South Ferry station, which fare access system will be installed. ST contact us at was opened on July 10, 1905. This station ADA ACCESSIBILITY — 231 STREET STA- [email protected] or by cannot accommodate a full-length train and TION: NYC Transit would like to install two phone at (212) 986-4482 is located on a sharp curve. NYC Transit ex- ADA-compliant elevators from the street to (voice mail available). ERA’s website is pects to build a new tunnel diverging from the the northbound and southbound control st www.electricrailroaders. existing tunnel at Greenwich Street and Bat- houses at the 231 Street station of the org. tery Place and continuing under Battery Park Broadway-Seventh Avenue Line. The con- to a new station under Peter Minuit Plaza. A tractor will reduce the gap between the plat- Editorial Staff: new mezzanine with direct access to the form edge and the door sill and provide plat- Editor-in-Chief: south mezzanine of the Whitehall Street sta- form edge warning strips and ADA- Bernard Linder tion would be built above the proposed new accessible turnstiles.
  • Improving Bus Service in New York a Thesis Presented to The

    Improving Bus Service in New York a Thesis Presented to The

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Columbia University Academic Commons Improving Bus Service in New York A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Architecture and Planning COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment Of the requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning By Charles Romanow May 2018 Abstract New York City’s transportation system is in a state of disarray. City street are clogged with taxi’s and for-hire vehicles, subway platforms are packed with straphangers waiting for delayed trains and buses barely travel faster than pedestrians. The bureaucracy of City and State government in the region causes piecemeal improvements which do not keep up with the state of disrepair. Bus service is particularly poor, moving at rates incomparable with the rest of the country. New York has recently made successful efforts at improving bus speeds, but only so much can be done amidst a city of gridlock. Bus systems around the world faced similar challenges and successfully implemented improvements. A toolbox of near-immediate and long- term options are at New York’s disposal dealing directly with bus service as well indirect causes of poor bus service. The failing subway system has prompted public discussion concerning bus service. A significant cause of poor service in New York is congestion. A number of measures are capable of improving congestion and consequently, bus service. Due to the city’s limited capacity at implementing short-term solutions, the most highly problematic routes should receive priority. Routes with slow speeds, high rates of bunching and high ridership are concentrated in Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn which also cater to the most subway riders.
  • Chapter 23: Response to Comments on the SDEIS1

    Chapter 23: Response to Comments on the SDEIS1

    Chapter 23: Response to Comments on the SDEIS1 A. INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes and responds to all substantive comments on the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) published in March 2003 for the Second Avenue Subway. Public review for the SDEIS began on March 2003, with publication and distribution of the document. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) held two public hearings to receive comments on the document: on May 12, 2003 in the auditorium of the Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House at One Bowling Green (Lower Manhattan); and on May 13, 2003, in the Hecksher Auditorium at El Museo del Barrio, 1230 Fifth Avenue (at 104th Street in East Harlem). The public comment period remained open until June 10, 2003. The SDEIS was circulated to involved and interested agencies and other parties and posted on the MTA’s website, and notice of its availability and the public hearing were published in the Federal Register on April 11, 2003. To advertise the public hearing, MTA published notices in the New York Post, Hoy, Amsterdam News, Chinese World Journal, and New York Daily News. In addition, information on the public hearing was posted on the MTA’s website, a notice of public hearing was mailed to all public officials and interested parties in the MTA service area; and a press release announcing the hearing was sent to all media outlets in the area. Bilingual signs announcing the hearing were posted in all MTA New York City Transit (NYCT) subway stations and on some buses. Brochures were handed out in major Manhattan East Side NYCT subway stations.
  • At Capacity: the Need for More Rail Access to the Manhattan CBD

    At Capacity: the Need for More Rail Access to the Manhattan CBD

    At Capacity: The Need for More Rail Access to the Manhattan CBD Rosemary Scanlon and Edward S. Seeley Jr. Elliot G. Sander, Director Allison L. C. de Cerreño, Co-Director November 2004 Rudin Center for Transportation Policy & Management NYU Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service 295 Lafayette Street, 2nd Floor New York, NY 10012 www.nyu.edu/wagner/rudincenter This report was made possible with support from the New York State Laborers and the General Contractors Association of New York, Inc. Their generosity is greatly appreciated. ABOUT THE RUDIN CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION POLICY & MANAGEMENT Established in 1996 at New York University’s Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, and named in September 2000 in recognition of a generous gift to NYU in support of the Center, the Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management is currently led by Elliot (Lee) G. Sander, Director, and Allison L. C. de Cerreño, Ph.D., Co-Director. The mission of the Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management is to encourage innovative thinking and action in transportation management and policy. With a team of Visiting Scholars drawn from both the transportation and academic communities, the Rudin Center conducts research and conferences, provides education and training, and promotes and supports key policy networks in the field of transportation policy and management. A number of publications are produced each year, based on the research, conferences, and training carried out by the Rudin Center. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report focuses on the need for new rail access to Manhattan to ensure that the economy of the Manhattan Central Business District (CBD) will retain its critical central function in the national and New York regional economy, and can expand the level of economic activity and jobs in this new century.
  • Request for Proposals for the Performance Of

    Request for Proposals for the Performance Of

    February 20, 2018 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF EXPERT PROFESSIONAL PLANNING AND FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE WHARF REPLACEMENT PROGRAM DURING 2018 THROUGH 2020 (RFP #52133) Dear Sir or Madam: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the “Authority”) is seeking proposals in response to this Request for Proposals (RFP) from prospective consultants (also “you,” “Firm” and “Proposer”) for the performance of expert planning and feasibility study for the wharf replacement program. The scope of the planning and feasibility study is to provide the Authority with a framework from which to plan the systematic replacement of its waterfront structures over a span of approximately thirty (30) years for its five (5) port facilities: Port Newark, Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal, Port Jersey-Port Authority Marine Terminal, Howland Hook Marine Terminal and Brooklyn-Port Authority Marine Terminal (“Wharf Replacement Program”). The term of the agreement between the Authority and the Consultant will be for two (2) years, with up to two (2) additional one (1) year option periods, upon the same terms, conditions and pricing, unless otherwise agreed to by the Authority. The scope of the services to be performed by you are set forth in Attachment A of the Authority’s Standard Agreement (the “Agreement”), included herewith as Exhibit II. You should carefully review this Agreement as it is the form of agreement that the Authority intends that you sign in the event of acceptance of your Proposal and forms the basis for the submission of Proposals. The services to be performed by the Consultant may be funded in whole or in part by the Federal Highway Administration, therefore Federally mandated terms and conditions are applicable (See Exhibit I for applicable Federal Highway Administration Requirements).
  • 8-25-20 MTA Transcript

    8-25-20 MTA Transcript

    NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES & COMMISSIONS ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES & COMMISSIONS IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY August 25, 2020 10:00 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. Page 2 Joint Hearing Impact of COVID-19 on MTA, 8-25-20 SENATORS PRESENT: SENATOR LEROY COMRIE, Chair, Senate Standing Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions SENATOR TIM KENNEDY, Chair, Senate Standing Committee on Transportation SENATOR TODD KAMINSKY SENATOR GUSTAVO RIVERA SENATOR ANNA KAPLAN SENATOR JESSICA RAMOS SENATOR ANDREW GOUNARDES SENATOR LUIS SEPULVEDA SENATOR THOMAS O’MARA SENATOR JOHN LIU SENATOR BRAD HOYLMAN SENATOR SHELLEY MAYER SENATOR MICHAEL RANZENHOFER SENATOR SUE SERINO Geneva Worldwide, Inc. 256 West 38t h Street, 10t h Floor, New York, NY 10018 Page 3 Joint Hearing Impact of COVID-19 on MTA, 8-25-20 ASSEMBLY MEMBERS PRESENT: ASSEMBLY MEMBER AMY PAULIN, Chair, Assembly Standing Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions ASSEMBLY MEMBER KENNETH BLANKENBUSH ASSEMBLY MEMBER CHARLES FALL ASSEMBLY MEMBER NILY ROZIC ASSEMBLY MEMBER SANDRA GALEF ASSEMBLY MEMBER STEVEN OTIS ASSEMBLY MEMBER RON KIM ASSEMBLY MEMBER STACEY PHEFFER AMATO ASSEMBLY MEMBER VIVIAN COOK ASSEMBLY MEMBER DAVID BUCHWALD ASSEMBLY MEMBER PHILLIP PALMESANO ASSEMBLY MEMBER ROBERT CARROLL ASSEMBLY MEMBER REBECCA SEAWRIGHT ASSEMBLY MEMBER CARMEN DE LA ROSA ASSEMBLY MEMBER YUH-LINE NIOU Geneva Worldwide,
  • IRUM's Additional Comments on Revised Supplemental

    IRUM's Additional Comments on Revised Supplemental

    INSTITUTE FOR RATIONAL URBAN MOBILITY, INC. George Haikalis One Washington Square Village, Suite 5D President New York, NY 10012 212-475-3394 [email protected] www.irum.org June 5, 2006 Joseph Petrocelli Chief, Finance & Administration MTA Capital Construction 469 7th Avenue New York, NY 10018 Re: Additional Comments on Revised Supplemental Environmental Assessment of Proposed 50th Street Vent Facility for MTA LIRR East Side Access Project Dear Mr. Petrocelli: Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you and others from MTA and also with Irwin Kessman of FTA on Thursday, June 1, 2006. My associates at the Regional Rail Working Group (RRWG) were especially grateful to be able to share some of their expertise and knowledge at the meeting. The RRWG is an informal coalition of transit advocates from New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. The RRWG and its advisors represent a broad cross-section of transit experts and advocates with many years of experience in planning, design and public participation. We were especially fortunate to have with us Phil Strong, former LIRR transportation engineer, Herb Landow, a retired railroad and transportation consulting executive, Albert L. Papp, Jr., a Director of the New Jersey Association of Railroad Passengers and Secretary of the Board of the National Association of Railroad Passengers, and William K. Guild, a lawyer with a longstanding interest in rail transit matters. The RRWG is hosted by the Institute for Rational Urban Mobility, Inc. (IRUM), a New York City-based not-for-profit corporation concerned with advancing cost-effective measures to reduce motor vehicle congestion in dense urban places.
  • Transitcenter Build Trust

    Transitcenter Build Trust

    The MTA Can Deliver a Capital Program That Puts Riders First B After a long run of rising usage, unreliable subway service has led to shrinking ridership despite growing population and jobs. Unless New York’s leaders reverse this decline, the continued health and prosperity of the region will be at risk. Cratering subway reliability and a surge in high- profile breakdowns during 2017 and 2018 drew attention to longstanding deficiencies that had previously skirted intense public scrutiny. The signal system is ancient and failure-prone. Hundreds of stations lack access for people with disabilities. Subway cars that should have been retired long ago are still pressed into service. The consequences of unreliable, inaccessible subways are felt most acutely by New Yorkers who do not have the means to live close to the Manhattan core. Riders with low incomes tend to lose more time to delays than more affluent riders,1 and accessible subway stations are scarcer in neighborhoods with more affordable rents.2 The decrepit condition of the subway system became the main rallying point for congestion pricing in 2019. Until that legislative session, congestion pricing and similar traffic reduction policies had failed to clear the necessary political hurdles in Albany, despite impressive policy merits. The dire transit situation helped ensure that this time would be different. Funds generated from tolls on driving in the Manhattan core will now supply at least $15 billion for a new wave of 1 Federal Reserve Bank of New transit investment. York. “Why New York City Leading up to the landmark congestion pricing vote, Subway Delays Don’t Affect opponents attacked the Metropolitan Transportation All Riders Equally,” June 2018.
  • New York State Freight Transportation Plan Background Analysis (Deliverable 1)

    New York State Freight Transportation Plan Background Analysis (Deliverable 1)

    NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) JUNE 2015 PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ III 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 COMMON GOALS AND THEMES................................................................................................... 2 2.1 | Goals Identification ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 | Theme Identification ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 | Gap Identification......................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Geographic Coverage......................................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Modal Coverage ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Gaps in Coordination ......................................................................................................................................................
  • 19DCP042M: 419 Broadway

    19DCP042M: 419 Broadway

    EAS FULL FORM PAGE 1 City Environmental Quality Review ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT (EAS) FULL FORM Please fill out and submit to the appropriate agency (see instructions) Part I: GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT NAME 419 Broadway 1. Reference Numbers CEQR REFERENCE NUMBER (to be assigned by lead agency) BSA REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) 19DCP042M ULURP REFERENCE NUMBER (if applicable) OTHER REFERENCE NUMBER(S) (if applicable) 190250 ZSM (e.g., legislative intro, CAPA) 2a. Lead Agency Information 2b. Applicant Information NAME OF LEAD AGENCY NAME OF APPLICANT New York City Department of City Planning 419 MM LLC NAME OF LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSON NAME OF APPLICANT’S REPRESENTATIVE OR CONTACT PERSON Olga Abinader, Acting Director, EARD Valerie Campbell, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel ADDRESS 120 Broadway, 31st Floor ADDRESS 1177 Avenue of Americas CITY New York STATE NY ZIP 10271 CITY New York STATE NY ZIP 10036 TELEPHONE 212‐720‐3493 EMAIL TELEPHONE 212‐715‐9183 EMAIL [email protected] [email protected] 3. Action Classification and Type SEQRA Classification UNLISTED TYPE I: Specify Category (see 6 NYCRR 617.4 and NYC Executive Order 91 of 1977, as amended): Action Type (refer to Chapter 2, “Establishing the Analysis Framework” for guidance) LOCALIZED ACTION, SITE SPECIFIC LOCALIZED ACTION, SMALL AREA GENERIC ACTION 4. Project Description The applicant seeks a CPC Special Permit pursuant to Zoning Resolution (ZR) Section 74‐711 to modify underlying use and bulk regulations to facilitate a 37,794 gross square feet (GSF) commercial development comprising 8,286 GSF of retail office space at the ground and cellar floors, and 29,508 GSF of office space and the preservation of an existing historic structure.
  • The Bulletin MTA OUTLINES PROPOSED 2021 BUDGET and Published by the Electric Railroaders’ FOUR-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN Association, Inc

    The Bulletin MTA OUTLINES PROPOSED 2021 BUDGET and Published by the Electric Railroaders’ FOUR-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN Association, Inc

    ERA BULLETIN — DECEMBER, 2020 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 63, No. 12 December, 2020 The Bulletin MTA OUTLINES PROPOSED 2021 BUDGET AND Published by the Electric Railroaders’ FOUR-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN Association, Inc. P. O. Box 3323 On November 18, the Metropolitan Trans- Agencies have already begun implementing Grand Central Station portation Authority (MTA) released its pro- these savings, which are now projected to New York, NY 10163 posed 2021 budget and four-year financial reduce expenses by $259 million in 2020, For general inquiries, plan amidst the worst financial crisis in agen- $601 million in 2021, $498 million in 2022, or Bulletin submissions, cy history. The plan includes devastating ser- $466 million in 2023 and $461 million in contact us at vice cuts, a drastic reduction in the agency’s 2024. https://erausa. org/ contact workforce and a continued pause on the his- In order to close the 2020 deficit caused by toric $51.5 billion Capital Plan in the absence federal inaction, the MTA will have to use its Editorial Staff: of $12 billion in federal aid. The MTA contin- authority to borrow the maximum of $2.9 bil- Jeff Erlitz ues to face an unprecedented financial crisis lion from the Federal Reserve’s Municipal Editor-in-Chief – eclipsing the Great Depression’s impact on Lending Facility (MLF) before the window Ron Yee transit revenue and ridership. closes at the end of 2020. The MTA is taking Tri-State News and The MTA presented a worst-case 2021 additional actions to address the 2020 deficit Commuter Rail Editor spending plan at its November Board meet- by releasing the current 2020 General Re- Alexander Ivanoff ing that assumes no additional federal emer- serve of $170 million, applying the $337 mil- North American and gency relief.