Mabira Forest Reserve

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mabira Forest Reserve The road from Kampala to Jinja passing through the Mabira Forest Reserve. Image Source: Brian McMorrow: Nile Whitewater Rafting, Jinja Mabira Forest: Ugandans Wake Up To The Cost Of Disappearing Forests In Uganda Forests or factories: Does industrialisation have to swallow what is left of Uganda's forests? Ray of Hope through Kabaka Mutebi. By Gerald Businge First published: March 24, 2007 A journey from Kampala as you drive to the eastern parts of Uganda through Mabira forest, gives you enough reason to believe the government when it says that Uganda is Gifted by Nature -a country promotional campaign Uganda launched last year, costing billions of shillings, hoping to promote the country's tourism potential. Travelling from Kampala to Jinja, one often sees the thick green forest on both sides of the road after Lugazi town. Mabira is a moist, tropical forest covering approximately 29,964 hectares (an equivalent of about 60,000 football fields), and is famous for its tourist, climatic as well as cultural importance -especially to the Buganda kingdom. But now Ugandans are trying to come to terms with the fact that part of this forest reserve may soon have to make room for a sugar plantation, drastically changing one of the few remaining protected areas and tourist attracting gems in the country. Forest land for sugarcane growing? In August 2006, President Yoweri Museveni ordered the National Forestry Authority (NFA) to do a study into the feasibility of clearing 7,100 hectares, nearly one fourth of Mabira Forest, in order to facilitate the expansion of sugar growing by Sugar Corporation of Uganda (SCOUL) which is owned by the Mehta Group. The Mehta Group had earlier applied to the President's office to expand its sugar-cane production to bolster the group's Lugazi sugar products. The Mehta group approached President Museveni, with an argument that part of the forest had been degraded and had inferior tree types, which could not produce valuable timber anyway. The company promised they would employ more people, address the prevailing sugar scarcity in Uganda and contribute more revenue to the country's coffers if given part of the forest. The cabinet ministers of Uganda recently agreed to de-gazette part of Mabira forest to allow SCOUL to plant more sugarcane, despite sustained opposition to the Mabira give away by the public. Although Ugandan Prime Minister, Apollo Nsibambi denied earlier this past week that his government had agreed to give the 71, 000 hectares of Mabira to SCOUL, many sources claim that it is a done deal. Why the fuss about Mabira? Nahan's Francolin Many Ugandans, environmentalists, NGOs and even government agencies like NFA have opposed the government's move arguing that the forest is a potential tourism destination that hosts endangered animal species, as well as 300 bird species like the Nahan's Francolin and the Papyrus Gonolek , which are popular with bird watchers. Mabira forest is the epitome of forests in Uganda. Not just because it is a big forest but its name locally means 'big forest'. NFA spokesperson Gaster Kiyingi says Mabira is one of the biggest natural forests in Uganda, acting as a water catchment area for the Lake Victoria and Lake Kyoga basins. Lake Victoria is the largest fresh water lake in the world and the source of river Nile, the longest river in the world. Mabira forest is a source of many rivers, livelihood of surrounding communities, a home to many rare bird species, plants and animals, and therefore a boost to eco-tourism in the country. Mabira forest receives more than 62% of all tourists visiting forest reserves in the country. Eco-tourism is the second largest foreign exchange earner and the potential for Mabira forest as tourist destination cannot be over-emphasized. The NFA study initially commissioned by President Museveni concluded that the ecological and economic losses from destroying part of Mabira would be devastating. The report says the plan endangers 312 tree species, 287 bird species and 199 butterfly species. Nine species found only in Mabira and nearby forests risk becoming extinct. The report says that economic losses as a result of the destruction of part of the reserve include lost revenue from logging and eco-tourism, the main source of tourist revenue in Uganda. Mabira's great importance to Uganda Kiyingi says that further depletion of Mabira forest will reduce the water flow of the surrounding streams and rivers and change rain patterns region wide, which in turn will negatively affect agriculture, cattle keeping, electricity supply and thus all economic activities in Uganda. The Ugandan government has given low water levels in Lake Victoria as the reason behind the country's current electricity crisis, and one would expect the nation's leaders to know better than to destroy the major source of water into Lake Victoria. Environmentalists say that with the water levels in Lake Victoria already low, destroying part of Mabira forest is likely to lower electricity production, and proposed hydroelectric projects such as Bujagali, the River Sezibwa power plant, will be meaningless. In addition to potential disturbances to the microclimate, destruction of Mabira could also violate major global conservation agreements to which Uganda is a signatory, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (1992). This requires the country to establish and maintain protected conservation areas. Uganda's flora and fauna are steadily losing their natural habitat to human activities. The Government of Uganda and its development partners, especially the European Union (EU), have invested heavily in the forest since 1990 to restore previously degraded areas. The NFA says the forest is recovering and 10 years are not enough for such a forest to regenerate and be fully stocked with valuable timber and other biodiversity resources. They also argued that Mabira forest is very important to the Baganda for many reasons. The Baganda believe that Mabira forest is the home of the Buganda's gods of rain and food. The Baganda also traditionally believe that if a strong hurricane emerges from the east, this forest will help block it and it will not make it to the Kabaka 's palace at Mengo. Additionally, the forest has thousands of trees (small and big), which the Baganda and other tribes traditionally use to harvest medicine during pregnancy and childbirth. What alternatives are available? While it may be understandable that the Ugandan government is trying to secure an adequate sugar supply as well as economic development of the country by giving part of Mabira to SCOUL, other investors have already committed money to the forest targeting its tourism potential. The Alam Group , assisted by its partners in the Netherlands, is already building an eco-lodge worth $2m (3.6bn Uganda shillings) in Mabira to harness the forest's tourism potential. The Alam Group, which is another heavy investor in Uganda, is not happy with theMabira give away. "In any hardwood forest in the country, this action should not be allowed," said Zahid Alam, who is building an eco-lodge in Mabira forest. Some people have asked the sugar company to find alternative land outside the forest, or consider out growing (buying sugarcane from Ugandans neighbouring Lugazi town where the SCOUL factory is located, who would earn much more than those the company would employ after planting more sugarcane in Mabira). The NFA had recommended that SCOUL allows individual growers to supplement its sugarcane requirements, or rent land from private landowners in the area around Mabira. All these pleas seem to be falling on deaf ears. What is more worrying for Ugandans is the fact that the Ugandan Parliament is likely to pass the effort by the Executive to de-gazzette part of Mabira for sugar planting. The ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) has a strong majority in Parliament. The NRM has 212 MPs in the 332 strong Parliament, while 40 are independents, 10 represent the Uganda people's Defense Forces (an arm of the Executive) and only 57 MPs are in opposition. The NRM recently warned NRM MPs to uphold strong 'discipline' and avoid voting against the party position in Parliament. Will the Ugandan government yield to public pressure? So what can Ugandans do to save Mabira, a forest that has been dear to many Ugandans since time immemorial? Some Ugandans opposed to the forest give awayare using other strategies including SMS asking people to shun sugar manufactured by SCOUL and several NGOs have organized news conferences opposing the government's intended move. Renowned environmentalist and opposition Conservative Party President, John Ken Lukyamuzi has threatened to stage a demonstration on May 1, 2007 as Uganda marks the International Labor Day unless the Ugandan government reverses the decision. "Losing these forests, particularly the Mabira Forest Reserve, would have enormous repercussions for both people and wildlife in Uganda." said Achilles Byaruhanga, Executive Director of Nature Uganda (Bird Life in Uganda). Byaruhanga says that Mabira Forest Reserve is listed by Bird Life International as an Important Bird Area (IBA). The forest contains over 300 species of bird, including the Endangered Nahan's Francolin Francolinus nahani . The forest also supports nine species of primate, a recently identified new mangabey sub-species in Uganda, Lophocebus albigena johnstoni and a new species of Short-tailed Fruit Bat. "The fact that we are still discovering new species of large animals in this forest is a pointer to its value for biodiversity. As a result, we are working hard to ensure the Ugandan government understands that holding onto these sites is of utmost importance, both in terms of conserving biodiversity and in terms of poverty reduction and economic growth" Byaruhanga emphasizes. The Ugandan government still has a chance to maneuver.
Recommended publications
  • The Unresolved Issues in the Bujagali Dam Project in Uganda
    THE UNRESOLVED ISSUES IN THE BUJAGALI DAM PROJECT IN UGANDA A LACK OF TRANSPARENCY AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 1 Strengthen democratic values, reduce poverty and injustice, JUNE 2007 promote international cooperation and advance human achievement A Publication of National This publication is funded by the Ford Association of Professional Foundation Environmentalists (NAPE) A map of Uganda showing Bujagali Dam site Source: Bujagali Energy Limited (BEL) BACKGROUND The once stalled Bujagali dam project is back for the second time on the Ugandan scene and is being fast-tracked. Many outstanding and new concerns plague the project. The project developer, Bujagali Energy Limited (BEL), is seeking financial support from the World Bank Group (WBG), African Development Bank (AfDB), European Invest- ment Bank (EIB) and others. As part of the dialogue and campaign process on the Bujagali project, Uganda’s Na- tional Association of Professional Environmentalists (NAPE), with financial support from the Ford Foundation carried-out out a public consultative process to establish whether there were still outstanding issues and concerns regarding the Bujagali proj- ect. The consultative process involved meetings with the dam-affected communities, the private sector, the academia, the dam developer (BEL), Government of Uganda, Nation- al Environment Management Authority (NEMA), the World Bank, civil society, cultural institutions and other stakeholders to obtain views and facts on the Bujagali Project. As part of the consultative process a “Peoples’ Public Hearing on the Bujagali Project” was 3 also held on the 31st March 2007 in Kampala. Source: NAPE File photo Peoples’ Public Hearing on Bujagali This publication records key issues that emerged during the consultation process, 1 Applied Energy Services Nile Power (AESNP) which remain unresolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Losing Ground.Pdf
    The Unprecedented Shrinking of Public Spaces LOSING and Land in Ugandan GROUND? Municipalities A publication of the Cities Alliance Joint Work Programme for Equitable Economic Growth in Cities By Paul. I. Mukwaya, Dmitry Pozhidaev, Denis Tugume, and Peter Kasaija © UNCDF and Cities Alliance 2018 AUTHORS Paul. I. Mukwaya, Department of Geography, Geo-informatics and Climatic Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda Dmitry Pozhidaev, United National Capital Development Fund, Kampala, Uganda Denis Tugume, Department of Geography, Geo-informatics and Climatic Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda Peter Kasaija, Department of Geography, Geo-informatics and Climatic Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda JWP MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION Rene Peter Hohmann, Cities Alliance Fredrik Bruhn, Cities Alliance GRAPHIC DESIGN Creatrix Design Group This publication was produced by Cities Alliance and the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF) as part of the Cities Alliance Joint Work Programme (JWP) for Equitable Economic Growth in Cities. The U.K. Department for International Development (DFID) chairs the JWP, and its members are the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF), UN-Habitat, Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO), Commonwealth Local Government Forum (CLGF), Ford Foundation, Institute for Housing and Development Studies (IHS) at Erasmus University Rotterdam and the World Bank. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the Cities Alliance, the United Nations, including UNCDF and UNOPS, or the UK Department for International Development (DFID). 2 Losing Ground? SUMMARY There is increasing importance being attached to is to promote economic growth that benefits ALL public spaces and other municipal assets, such as citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Buikwe District Economic Profile
    BUIKWE DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT P.O.BOX 3, LUGAZI District LED Profile A. Map of Buikwe District Showing LLGs N 1 B. Background 1.1 Location and Size Buikwe District lies in the Central region of Uganda, sharing borders with the District of Jinja in the East, Kayunga along river Sezibwa in the North, Mukono in the West, and Buvuma in Lake Victoria. The District Headquarters is in BUIKWE Town, situated along Kampala - Jinja road (11kms off Lugazi). Buikwe Town serves as an Administrative and commercial centre. Other urban centers include Lugazi, Njeru and Nkokonjeru Town Councils. Buikwe District has a total area of about 1209 Square Kilometres of which land area is 1209 square km. 1.2 Historical Background Buikwe District is one of the 28 districts of Uganda that were created under the local Government Act 1 of 1997. By the act of parliament, the district was inniatially one of the Counties of Mukono district but later declared an independent district in July 2009. The current Buikwe district consists of One County which is divided into three constituencies namely Buikwe North, Buikwe South and Buikwe West. It conatins 8 sub counties and 4 Town councils. 1.3 Geographical Features Topography The northern part of the district is flat but the southern region consists of sloping land with great many undulations; 75% of the land is less than 60o in slope. Most of Buikwe District lies on a high plateau (1000-1300) above sea level with some areas along Sezibwa River below 760m above sea level, Southern Buikwe is a raised plateau (1220-2440m) drained by River Sezibwa and River Musamya.
    [Show full text]
  • Mumbai's Kala Ghoda Gets a New Culinary Destination with The
    July-September 2018 Mumbai's Kala Ghoda gets a New Culinary Destination with the launch of RUE DU LIBAN After delighting Mumbaikars with a hearty Italian menu served at their award winning restaurant – Gustoso, Indianapoli Hospitality is ready to take your palates on a journey through the Levant at their newly launched restaurant – Rue Du Liban. Housed in a heritage building in the heart of South Mumbai at the iconic Kala Ghoda, the restaurant is a visual delight. Brainchild of Mr. Jay Mehta, this gourmet destination has been launched in association with his partners Mr. Sam Malde and Ms. Arja Shridhar. COVER STORY July-September 2018 2 Luxury at its Best Rue Du Liban's menu is specially curated to bring you the taste of authentic Levantine cuisine. For those who do not know, Levantine cuisine has a strong multi-cultural influence that includes a delectable fare with traces that are century old, all amalgamated together – from Phoenicians, Turks, Lebanese, Jews and the French. Spread across a luxurious 3200 sq.ft. of space, the plush Art-Deco inspired interiors are accentuated by royal burgundy banquettes. Dale Atkinson, from the London-based designed firm Rosendale Design has given a royal touch to the ambiance with decorative elements like custom lamps, brass work, hand-painted olive leaves on green walls and bespoke glass leaves hanging from the ceiling. Not just the interiors, the crockery at the restaurant spells royalty as well. Specially handcrafted crockery commissioned by Pune-based Curators of Clay along with a range of glamorous brassware from Udaipur-based Baarique exhibit subtle designs that remains exclusive to Rue Du Liban.
    [Show full text]
  • E464 Volume I1;Wj9,GALIPROJECT 4 TOMANSMISSIONSYSTEM
    E464 Volume i1;Wj9,GALIPROJECT 4 TOMANSMISSIONSYSTEM Public Disclosure Authorized Preparedfor: UGANDA A3 NILE its POWER Richmond;UK Public Disclosure Authorized Fw~~~~I \ If~t;o ,.-, I~~~~~~~ jt .4 ,. 't' . .~ Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by: t~ IN),I "%4fr - - tt ?/^ ^ ,s ENVIRONMENTAL 111teinlauloln.al IMPACT i-S(. Illf STATEME- , '. vi (aietlph,t:an,.daw,,, -\S_,,y '\ /., 'cf - , X £/XL March, 2001 - - ' Public Disclosure Authorized _, ,;' m.. .'ILE COPY I U Technical Resettlement Technical Resettlement Appendices and A e i ActionPlan ,Community ApenicsAcinPla Dlevelopment (A' Action Plan (RCDAP') The compilete Bujagali Project EIA consists of 7 documents Note: Thetransmission system documentation is,for the most part, the same as fhat submittedto ihe Ugandcn National EnvironmentalManagement Authority(NEMAI in December 2000. Detailsof the changes made to the documentation betwoon Dccomber 2000 and the presentsubmission aro avoiloblo from AESN P. Only the graphics that have been changed since December, 2000 hove new dates. FILE: DOChUME[NTC ,ART.CD I 3 fOOt'ypnIp, .asod 1!A/SJV L6'.'''''' '' '.' epurf Ut tUISWXS XillJupllD 2UI1SIXg Itb L6 ... NOJIDSaS1J I2EIof (INY SISAlVNV S2IAIlVNTIuaJ bV _ b6.sanl1A Puu O...tp.s.. ZA .6san1r^A pue SD)flSUIa1DJltJJ WemlrnIn S- (7)6. .. .--D)qqnd llH S bf 68 ..............................................................--- - -- io ---QAu ( laimpod u2Vl b,-£ 6L ...................................... -SWulaue lu;DwIa:43Spuel QSI-PUU'l Z btl' 6L .............................................----- * -* -SaULepunog QAfjP.4SlUTtUPad l SL. sUOItllpuo ltUiOUOZg-OioOS V£ ££.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A2~~~~~~~~~3V s z')J -4IOfJIrN 'Et (OAIOsOa.. Isoa0 joJxxNsU uAWom osILr) 2AX)SO> IsaIo4 TO•LWN ZU£N 9s ... suotll puoD [eOT20olla E SS '' ''''''''..........''...''................................. slotNluolqur wZ S5 ' '' '' '' ' '' '' '' - - - -- -........................- puiN Z'Z'£ j7i.. .U.13 1uu7EF ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Bujagali Hydropower Project in Uganda
    Modern Approaches in Oceanography and Petrochemical Sciences DOI: 10.32474/MAOPS.2019.02.000141 ISSN: 2637-6652 Research Article Assessing the Bujagali Hydropower Project in Uganda George Kimbowa1 and Khaldoon A Mourad2* 1Busitema University, Uganda 2Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Lund, Sweden *Corresponding author: Khaldoon A Mourad, Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Lund, Sweden Received: January 21, 2019 Published: January 29, 2019 Abstract The development of great dams and hydropower plants increases power supply and access. However, the process is considered a threat to livelihoods, ecosystem and biodiversity because in most cases it brings about human displacement and natural resources degradation. This paper seeks to assess the development of the Bujagali Hydropower Plant in Uganda (BHP) and its compliance with IWRM principles based on water knowledges, societal values, and inter-disciplinary approach. The paper develops a set of strategic interventions for the dam and the BHP based on SWOT analysis, XLRM framework, Multi-sectoral and interdisciplinary development approach, and sustainable management. These measures are deemed socially and ecologically acceptable by all stakeholders including the cultural and historical institutions, societal actor groups, including mega-hydraulic bureaucracies, the private sectors and national politicians. The results show that project developers should always carry out Environment and Social Impact Assessments (ESIA); develop timely ‘Resettlement Action Plan’; carry out informed consultation and participation; promote transparency; and communicate project’s risks, potential impacts and probable mitigation actions to attain sustainability. The paper proposes some policy interventions to be implemented along the project’s lifetime. Furthermore, it presents a sustainable development plan for such projects based on the IWRM principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Portrait of a Resented Race
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Portrait of a Resented Race Investigating how the Ugandan media covered the bitter sentiments against Asians expressed in April 2007 and what these sentiments say about the future of Asians in Uganda. Annet Kizza Rønningsbakk Thesis Submitted In Partial Fulfillment for the Master of Journalism Institute of Media and Communication University of Oslo Spring 2011 i ii iii Table of Contents LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................ v ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................. vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... xi 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Historical Background ...................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Statement of the problem ................................................................................................. 6 1.3 Research questions
    [Show full text]
  • Bujagali Energy Limited Project Number
    BUJAGALI ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Project Title: Bujagali Energy Limited Project Number: P-UG-FAB-008 Country: Uganda Department: Energy Financial Solutions, Policy & Regulation Division: Energy Financial Solutions Project Category: 1 1.0 Introduction Bujagali Energy Limited (BEL) is owned by SG Bujagali Holdings Ltd (an affiliate of Sithe Global Power LLC), Jubilee Insurance Company Ltd., as well as the Africa Power Platform PCC, which is owned by CDC (the UK’s Development Finance Institution), the Aga Khan Fund for Economic Development (AKFED) and IPS Kenya (“the Sponsors”). Operations and Maintenance Energy (Uganda) Limited (O&ME) operates the Hydropower project. The Bujagali Project is a 250MW hydropower facility — developed through a build-own-operate-transfer (BOOT) model — on the Victoria Nile River near the town of Jinja. It reached financial close in 2007, eight years after Government of Uganda (GoU) liberalized its electricity sector in 1999. When commissioned in 2012, it did not only displace expensive emergency power generation, but also contributed towards paving the way for a handful of other smaller scale IPPs that will provide more than 200 MW of small hydro, solar, and bagasse power to the network by around 2020. However, to drive the country’s industrialization program, the GoU is actively looking for ways to reduce the country’s electricity tariffs. In this context, and based on the projected tariff profile, the Bujagali tariff is set to increase from 11.3 US cents/kWh in 2016 to 13.3 US cents/kWh in 2018 and to 14.7 US cents by 2023 due to end of a tax ‘holiday’ (accelerated depreciation) and the debt amortization — before decreasing to 7 US cents/kWh from 2024.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Auditor General for the Year Ended 30Th June, 2007 Volume 4 Statutory Corporations
    OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA ANNUAL REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE, 2007 VOLUME 4 STATUTORY CORPORATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction/Mandate .................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope Of Auditor General‟s Work .................................................................... 1 3.0 Status Of Completion Of Audits ...................................................................... 3 4.0 Audit Opinions - (Certification Of Accounts) ..................................................... 8 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Financial Audit Opinions And Types Of Certification Of Accounts Issued During The Period 1st July 2006 To 30th June 2007 ................................................................. 8 4.3 Unqualified Audit Opinion ............................................................................................... 8 4.4 Unqualified Reports With Emphasis Of Matter ......................................................... 10 4.4.1 Uganda Coffee Development Authority (Year Ended 30th September 2005) ..... 11 4.4.2. National Youth Council Accounts – (Year Ended 30th June 2003) ...................... 11 4.4.3 Uganda Export Promotion Board (Uepb) (Year Ended 31st December 2002) .... 11 4.4.4 .Uganda Investment Authority (Year Ended 30th June 2005) ............................. 12 4.4.5 .Non-Performing Assets
    [Show full text]
  • I Large-Scale Land Acquisitions for Investment in Uganda
    Large-Scale Land Acqusitions for Investment in Uganda Samuel B Mabikke Large-Scale Land Acquisitions for Investment in Uganda: Can it Yield Equitable Benefits for Smallholder Farmers? Presented at the Sixth Annual conference Theme: “Foreign Land Acquisitions in Africa: Implications for Trade, Investment and Development Policies” 24 – 25 November 2011 Arusha, Tanzania Samuel B Mabikke1 The views contained within do not necessarily represent those of trapca or its partners. 1 Chair of Land Management, Technische Universität München, Arcisstrasse 21, D-80333, Munich, GERMANY, E-mail: [email protected] i Large-Scale Land Acqusitions for Investment in Uganda Samuel B Mabikke Abstract By 2 Samuel B. Mabikke Technische Universität München, Germany Email: [email protected] In the wake of the increasing food prices and the subsequent Global Financial Crisis (GFC), with over one billion people going hungry, Large-Scale Land Acquisitions (LSLA) have attracted considerable interests in developing countries. The purchase or lease of land by wealthy, food-insecure nations and private investors from mostly poor, developing nations in order to produce food crops for export is gaining momentum. In the attempt of fighting poverty, create employment and transform agricultural development, many developing countries have attracted investors with promises of making big land offers or leases for investment. In turn, host countries are promised positive investment returns in agricultural development, infrastructure, education, and employment creation. However, evidence shows that little or none of these promises made by investors are fulfilled yet land and water rights, food security and livelihood of local people remain at stake. It is estimated that between 15 and 20 million hectares of farmland in developing countries have been subject to transactions or negotiations involving foreign investors since 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • East Africa's Family-Owned Business Landscape
    EAST AFRICA’S FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS LANDSCAPE 500 LEADING COMPANIES ACROSS THE REGION PREMIUM SPONSORS: 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EAST AFRICA’S FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS CONTENTS LANDSCAPE Co-Founder, CEO 3 Executive Summary Rob Withagen 4 Methodology Co-Founder, COO Greg Cohen 7 1. MARKET LANDSCAPE Project Director 8 Regional Heavyweight: East Africa Leads Aicha Daho Growth Across the Continent Content Director 10 Come Together: Developing Intra- Jennie Forcier Patterson Regional Trade Opens Markets of Data Director Significant Scale Yusra Khadra 11 Interview: Banque du Caire Editorial Manager Lauren Mellows 13 2. FOB THEMES Research & Data Team Alexandria Akena 14 Stronger Together: Private Equity Jerome Amedo Offers Route to Growth for Businesses Laban Bore Prepared to Cede Some Ownership Jessen Chiniven Control Woyneab Habte Mayowa Hambolu 15 Interview: Centum Investment Milkiyas Lekeleh Siyum 16 Interview: Nairobi Securities Exchange Omololu Adeniran 17 A Hire Calling: Merit is Becoming a Medina Mamadou Stronger Factor in FOB Employment Kuringe Masao Melina Matabishi Practices Ivan Matoowa 18 Interview: Anjarwalla & Khanna Sweetness Mathew 21 Interview: CDC Group Plc Paige Arhaus Theodore Angwenyi 22 Interview: Melvin Marsh International Design 23 Planning for the Future: Putting Next- Nuno Caldeira Generation Leaders at the Helm 24 Interview: Britania Allied Industries 25 3. COUNTRY DEEPDIVES 25 Kenya 45 Ethiopia 61 Uganda 77 Tanzania 85 Rwanda 91 4. FOB DIRECTORY EAST AFRICA’S FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS LANDSCAPE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018-19 45Th ANNUAL REPORT 2018-19
    Annual Report 2018-19 45th ANNUAL REPORT 2018-19 Page Nos. General Information.......................................................................................................... 2 I Directors’ Report................................................................................................................ 3 Annexure 1. Management Discussion and Analysis Report (Annexure A).................................................. 10 2. Secretarial Audit Report of Subsidiary Company (Annexure B).............................................. 13 3. Corporate Governance Report (Annexure C)....................................................................... 16 4. Other Annexures (Annexure D to L).................................................................................... 37 II Standalone 1. Independent Auditors’ Report on Standalone Financial Statements......................................... 48 2. Balance Sheet................................................................................................................. 56 3. Statement of Profit & Loss.................................................................................................. 57 4. Statement of Changes in Equity......................................................................................... 58 5. Statement of Cash Flows................................................................................................... 59 6. Notes forming part of Financial Statements......................................................................... 61
    [Show full text]