DOCSLIB.ORG

Texas Is the Overwintering Source of Fall Armyworm in Central Pennsylvania: Implications for Migration Into the Northeastern United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Texas Is the Overwintering Source of Fall Armyworm in Central Pennsylvania: Implications for Migration Into the Northeastern United States POPULATION ECOLOGY Texas Is the Overwintering Source of Fall Armyworm in Central Pennsylvania: Implications for Migration Into the Northeastern United States 1,2 3 1 RODNEY N. NAGOSHI, SHELBY FLEISCHER, AND ROBERT L. MEAGHER Environ. Entomol. 38(6): 1546Ð1554 (2009) ABSTRACT Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), infes- tations in most of North America arise from annual migrations of populations that overwinter in southern Texas and Florida. Cytochrome oxidase I haplotype proÞles within the fall armyworm corn strain, the subgroup that preferentially infests corn (Zea mays L.), can differentiate the Texas and Florida populations. We use this molecular metric to show that fall armyworms in central Pennsylvania originate from Texas, indicating the existence of a migratory pathway from Texas to the northeastern United States. These results were compared with historical trapping data for fall armyworm and another migratory noctuid, corn earworm Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in the Pennsylvania and Maryland corn-producing areas to better deÞne lepidopteran migratory pathways. KEY WORDS Spodoptera frugiperda, cytochrome oxidase, Noctuidae, haplotype The capacity for long distance migration often seen in relationships that might have predictive value. An the family Noctuidae has critical economic implica- example of this is the positive correlation observed tions because it is a major mechanism for the seasonal between corn acreage (the natal host resource) and expansion of pest populations. These species annually the extent of subsequent fall armyworm infestation in reinvade their northern geographic range, presumably cotton in adjacent states (Nagoshi 2009). The infor- to expand host resources, in spatial and temporal pat- mation will also facilitate the testing of aerobiological terns that use dynamic but deÞnable atmospheric models designed to predict migratory movements pathways (Westbrook and Sparks 1986, Isard et al. (Isard et al. 2009). 2005, Westbrook 2008). This is particularly true for Several attempts have been made to describe the species that do not diapause and therefore have a annual migrations of fall armyworm in North America limited temperature range for overwintering. A nota- (reviewed in Nagoshi and Meagher 2008). The most ble example in North America is fall armyworm, Spo- detailed descriptions were inferred from the timing of doptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), a major pest of corn fall armyworm appearances through trapping and and other crops (Sparks 1979, Hall 1988, Pashley other forms of monitoring (Luginbill 1928, Pair et al. 1988a, Foster 1989). Populations that overwinter in 1986). These indicated both a northward movement southern Florida and Texas are responsible for annual from Texas into Oklahoma and a northeasterly ßow infestations that extend throughout the central and from southern Texas that follows the Gulf of Mexico eastern portions of the United States and southern coastal plain into the Mississippi River Valley, with Canada (Luginbill 1928). Understanding the pattern of population move- appearances in central Tennessee by mid-July, in ments is critical to efforts to control and predict in- southeastern Kansas in late July, and in the Ohio Val- festations by migratory pests. Such knowledge makes ley and Maryland by August and September. Luginbill possible a direct assessment of how conditions at the (1928) also suggested that populations in southern source location can inßuence the timing and severity Florida migrate into north-central Georgia by June, of subsequent infestations and expedite identifying continuing east of the Appalachians into South Caro- lina by July, and perhaps continuing northward along The use of trade, Þrm, or corporation names in this publication is the Atlantic coastal plain. There may also be a north- for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not westerly movement from southern Florida that con- constitute an ofÞcial endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Agricultural Research Service of any product or tributes to the infestation in the Mississippi Valley service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. (Pair et al. 1986). These descriptions are generally 1 Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, consistent with movements expected from average USDAÐARS, Gainesville, FL 32604. synoptic meteorological conditions (Rose et al. 1975, 2 Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]. 3 Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, Westbrook and Sparks 1986, Mitchell et al. 1991) and University Park, PA 16802. the geographical distribution of subpopulations that 0046-225X/09/1546Ð1554$04.00/0 ᭧ 2009 Entomological Society of America December 2009 NAGOSHI ET AL.: FALL ARMYWORM MIGRATION 1547 differed with respect to disease or pesticide resistance Table 1. Source locality information of fall armyworm col- (Young 1979, Fuxa 1987, Pitre 1988). lected from pheromone traps placed near corn fields These approaches provide a broad picture of pop- Label Location Date Reference/collector ulation movements but are limited in their resolution. In particular, inferences on the origin of immigrant TX 04-6 Hidalgo Co, TX 2004Ð6 Nagoshi et al. 2008a, b TX 06 San Angelo, TX 2006 Nagoshi et al. 2008b populations become increasingly less accurate as mi- TX 04 College Station, TX 2004 Nagoshi et al. 2008b gratory distance increases. Ultimately, the validation FL 02-3 Miami-Dade Co, FL 2002Ð3 Nagoshi et al. 2007 of projected pathways will require a direct method for FL 04-5 Miami-Dade Co, FL 2004Ð5 Nagoshi et al. 2007 identifying the overwintering origin, for example, by FL 06 FL (various sites) 2006 R.M. PA 01 College Station, PA 2001 Fleischer et al. 2005 artiÞcially tagging and recapturing immigrants or anal- PA 06 Rock Springs, PA 2006 S.F. ysis of genetic or other physical markers that can PA 07 Rock Springs, PA 2007 S.F. distinguish between overwintering populations (see, for example, Showers et al. 1989, Hendrix and Showers 1992). most of the northeast section of the United States. The Fall armyworm can be subdivided into two behav- second objective was to determine whether the data iorally distinct, but morphologically identical, strains from statewide trapping surveys can provide addi- that were initially identiÞed by differences in plant tional information about the direction of migration host distribution, hence their designation as rice strain and the entry point into the state. The PestWatch and corn strain (Pashley et al. 1985, 1987; Pashley 1986, program based at Pennsylvania State University makes 1988b). Several studies have shown that polymor- available multiyear, statewide trapping data for fall phisms in the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I armyworm (http://www.pestwatch.psu.edu/). This (COI) gene provides a convenient and accurate resource was used to compare the trapping patterns of marker for strain identity based on correlations with fall armyworm with corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea behavioral differences (Lu and Adang 1996, Levy et al. (Boddie), another noctuid with an overlapping host 2002, Meagher and Gallo-Meagher 2003, Prowell et al. range that also exhibits migratory ßight behavior and 2004). The corn strain population as deÞned by the nocturnal transport (Hendrix et al. 1987, Lingren et al. COI marker can be further subdivided into four hap- 1993, Westbrook et al. 1995, Westbrook et al. 1998). lotype subgroups designated as CS-h1, CS-h2, CS-h3, The implications of these observations on our under- and CS-h4 (Nagoshi et al. 2007). Surveys of popula- standing of fall armyworm migration and the useful- tions from Brazil, Texas, and Florida show that all four ness of extensive historical pest survey data to inves- subgroups are present in each area, but there are tigate migration are discussed. consistent differences in their relative proportions. This is most evident when observing the ratio of the Materials and Methods CS-h4 to CS-h2 haplotype proportions. Analysis of Florida corn strain populations over a 4-yr period and Specimen Collections and Sites. Fall armyworm over several locations spanning the state showed a specimens were obtained at several locations in the CS-h4/CS-h2 ratio that was consistently Ͼ1.0 (Na- United States (Table 1). In the Florida collections goshi et al. 2007). In contrast, populations from Brazil from 2006 and 2007, adult males were collected using and Texas, again sampled over multiple years and pheromone traps as previously described (Meagher locations, consistently showed a ratio Ͻ0.5 (Nagoshi 2001). Standard plastic Universal moth traps (Uni- et al. 2007, 2008b). Because these haplotypes are de- traps) were baited with a commercially available fall Þned by synonymous single nucleotide polymor- armyworm pheromone (Suterra, Bend, OR) and con- phisms, it is reasonable to assume that they can serve tained insecticide strips (Hercon Environmental, as neutral markers to identify a Florida or Texas origin Emigsville, PA). After collection, specimens were typ- without the complications of selective pressure. As a ically stored at Ϫ20ЊC. In 2006 and 2007, the Pennsyl- proof of concept, corn strain populations in Georgia, vania samples were collected as above, using the “Fall Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi were analyzed for Armyworm-PSU” lure (Scentry Biologicals, Billings, their CS-h4/CS-h2 ratios (Nagoshi et al. 2008b). These MT), which is the two-component lure described
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Overwintering Distribution of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera Frugiperda) in Yunnan, China, and Influencing Environmental Factors
    insects Article Overwintering Distribution of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Yunnan, China, and Influencing Environmental Factors Yanru Huang 1,2, Yingying Dong 1,2,*, Wenjiang Huang 1,2,* , Binyuan Ren 3, Qiaoyu Deng 4,5, Yue Shi 6, Jie Bai 2,7, Yu Ren 1,2 , Yun Geng 1,2 and Huiqin Ma 1 1 Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China; [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (Y.R.); [email protected] (Y.G.); [email protected] (H.M.) 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; [email protected] 3 National Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center, Beijing 100125, China; [email protected] 4 School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China; [email protected] 5 Key Lab. of Geographic Information Science (Ministry of Education), School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China 6 Department of Computing and Mathematics, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK; [email protected] 7 State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.D.); [email protected] (W.H.) Received: 8 October 2020; Accepted: 13 November 2020; Published: 15 November 2020 Simple Summary: The fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) is a nondiapausing insect pest capable of causing large reductions in the yield of crops, especially maize. Every year, the new generation of fall armyworms from Southeast Asia flies to East Asia via Yunnan, and some of them will grow, develop and reproduce in Yunnan since the geographical location and environmental conditions of Yunnan are very beneficial for the colonization of fall armyworms.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn Earworm, Helicoverpa Zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 John L
    EENY-145 Corn Earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 John L. Capinera2 Distribution California; and perhaps seven in southern Florida and southern Texas. The life cycle can be completed in about 30 Corn earworm is found throughout North America except days. for northern Canada and Alaska. In the eastern United States, corn earworm does not normally overwinter suc- Egg cessfully in the northern states. It is known to survive as far north as about 40 degrees north latitude, or about Kansas, Eggs are deposited singly, usually on leaf hairs and corn Ohio, Virginia, and southern New Jersey, depending on the silk. The egg is pale green when first deposited, becoming severity of winter weather. However, it is highly dispersive, yellowish and then gray with time. The shape varies from and routinely spreads from southern states into northern slightly dome-shaped to a flattened sphere, and measures states and Canada. Thus, areas have overwintering, both about 0.5 to 0.6 mm in diameter and 0.5 mm in height. overwintering and immigrant, or immigrant populations, Fecundity ranges from 500 to 3000 eggs per female. The depending on location and weather. In the relatively mild eggs hatch in about three to four days. Pacific Northwest, corn earworm can overwinter at least as far north as southern Washington. Larva Upon hatching, larvae wander about the plant until they Life Cycle and Description encounter a suitable feeding site, normally the reproductive structure of the plant. Young larvae are not cannibalistic, so This species is active throughout the year in tropical and several larvae may feed together initially.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physiology of Cold Hardiness in Terrestrial Arthropods*
    REVIEW Eur. J. Entomol. 96: 1-10, 1999 ISSN 1210-5759 The physiology of cold hardiness in terrestrial arthropods* L auritz S0MME University of Oslo, Department of Biology, P.O. Box 1050 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Terrestrial arthropods, cold hardiness, ice nucleating agents, cryoprotectant substances, thermal hysteresis proteins, desiccation, anaerobiosis Abstract. Insects and other terrestrial arthropods are widely distributed in temperate and polar regions and overwinter in a variety of habitats. Some species are exposed to very low ambient temperatures, while others are protected by plant litter and snow. As may be expected from the enormous diversity of terrestrial arthropods, many different overwintering strategies have evolved. Time is an im­ portant factor. Temperate and polar species are able to survive extended periods at freezing temperatures, while summer adapted species and tropical species may be killed by short periods even above the freezing point. Some insects survive extracellular ice formation, while most species, as well as all spiders, mites and springtails are freeze intoler­ ant and depend on supercooling to survive. Both the degree of freeze tolerance and supercooling increase by the accumulation of low molecular weight cryoprotectant substances, e.g. glycerol. Thermal hysteresis proteins (antifreeze proteins) stabilise the supercooled state of insects and may prevent the inoculation of ice from outside through the cuticle. Recently, the amino acid sequences of these proteins have been revealed. Due to potent ice nucleating agents in the haemolymph most freeze tolerant insects freeze at relatively high temperatures, thus preventing harmful effects of intracellular freezing.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Genetic Complexity and Migration
    546 Florida Entomologist 91(4) December 2008 REVIEW OF FALL ARMYWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) GENETIC COMPLEXITY AND MIGRATION RODNEY N. NAGOSHI AND ROBERT L. MEAGHER Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, USDA-ARS, Gainesville, FL 32608 ABSTRACT The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) is a significant economic pest in the western hemisphere, causing substantial losses in corn, sorghum, forage, and turf grasses. Although fall armyworm does not survive severe winters, it infests most of the central and eastern United States and Canada because of annual migrations from overwintering sites in Florida and Texas. A detailed description of these movements is a prerequisite for identify- ing the factors that determine the timing and direction of migration and for developing mod- els that can predict the severity of infestations at the migratory destinations. Complicating this effort is genetic heterogeneity within the species, which increases phenotypic variabil- ity. Particularly important are 2 “host strains”, defined by a preferential association with ei- ther large grasses (designated corn-strain), such as corn and sorghum, or smaller grasses (designated rice-strain), such as rice and bermudagrass. This paper reviews recent studies examining the genetic complexity of fall armyworm populations, including characteristics of the 2 strains and the possibility of subgroups within strains. The use of this information to monitor short and long distance movements is discussed. Key Words: Spodoptera frugiperda, migration, haplotype, cytochrome oxidase I RESUMEN El gusano cogollero, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) es una plaga económicamente sig- nificativa en el hemisferio occidental, que causa perdidas substanciales en maíz, sorgo, fo- rraje y céspedes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera Frugiperda (JE Smith)
    EENY098 Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 John L. Capinera2 Introduction and Distribution The fall armyworm is native to the tropical regions of the western hemisphere from the United States to Argentina. It normally overwinters successfully in the United States only in southern Florida and southern Texas. The fall armyworm is a strong flier, and disperses long distances annually during the summer months. It is recorded from virtually all states east of the Rocky Mountains. However, as a regular and serious pest, its range tends to be mostly the southeastern states. In 2016 it was reported for the first time in West and Central Africa, so it now threatens Africa and Europe. Figure 1. Eggs of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith), Description and Life Cycle hatching. The life cycle is completed in about 30 days during the Credits: Jim Castner, UF/IFAS summer, but 60 days in the spring and autumn, and 80 to 90 days during the winter. The number of generations Egg occurring in an area varies with the appearance of the The egg is dome shaped; the base is flattened and the egg dispersing adults. The ability to diapause is not present in curves upward to a broadly rounded point at the apex. The this species. In Minnesota and New York, where fall army- egg measures about 0.4 mm in diameter and 0.3 mm in worm moths do not appear until August, there may be but a height. The number of eggs per mass varies considerably single generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status and Ecology of the Monarch Butterfly in the United States
    Conservation Status and Ecology of the Monarch Butterfly in the United States Sarina Jepsen, Dale F. Schweitzer, Bruce Young, Nicole Sears, Margaret Ormes, and Scott Hoffman Black NatureServe and the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation 1 Conservation Status and Ecology of the Monarch Butterfly in the United States Sarina Jepsen Dale F. Schweitzer Bruce Young Nicole Sears Margaret Ormes Scott Hoffman Black Prepared for the U.S. Forest Service by: NatureServe Arlington, Virginia and The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation Portland, Oregon March 2015 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). They do not represent the views or opinions of the United States Forest Service or the Department of Agriculture. Arlington, Virginia www.natureserve.org Portland, Oregon www.xerces.org Acknowledgements Funding for this report was provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Additional funding to support Xerces Society staff time was provided by the Bay and Paul Foundations, Endangered Species Chocolate, and the Turner Foundation, Inc. Thanks go to Dr. Karen Oberhauser (University of Minnesota) for reviewing the report and to Candace Fallon, Margo Conner, and Rich Hatfield (The Xerces Society) for contributing to report preparation. Editing and layout: Matthew Shepherd, The Xerces Society. Recommended Citation Jepsen, S., D. F. Schweitzer, B. Young, N. Sears, M. Ormes, and S. H. Black. 2015. Conservation Status and Ecology of Monarchs in the United States. 36 pp. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, and the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, Portland, Oregon. Front Cover Photograph Overwintering monarchs clustering in a coast redwood tree at a site in California.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flight Phenological Responses of Lepidoptera to Climate Change in Britain and Germany (Insecta, Lepidoptera) by J O H N F
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2003) 3 4 {1/2):3-16, Wurzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 The flight phenological responses of Lepidoptera to climate change in Britain and Germany (Insecta, Lepidoptera) by J o h n F. Burton & T im H. Sparks received 15.111.2003 S um m ary: This paper is a revised and updated version of one published in the journal British Wildlife (Burton & S parks , 2002). It incorporates analyses of additional phenological data concerning German Lepidoptera extracted from records of a selection of migrant and partially migrant species published annually in Atalanta. Some comparisons are therefore possible be­ tween the influence of recent climate changes on Lepidoptera in southern Britain and Ger­ many. The British data, much of it encompassing the period 1940-1999, indicates that butterfly species overwintering in Britain in any stage of their life cycle were appearing earlier in the 1990s compared with both the 1940s and the 1970s by an average of 28 days (Table 1). In contrast the German data, encompassing the period 1960-1999, indicate that such over­ wintering species were appearing earlier by an average of eight days compared with the 1960s and by 12 days compared with the 1970s (Table 3). A comparison between the 1990s and 1970s for four species of butterflies overwintering in both countries in the imago stage (Gonepteryx rhamni (L., 1758), Vanessa atalanta (L., 1758), Inachis io (L., 1758) and Aglais urticae (L., 1758)) indicated that they were appearing earlier by an average of 74 days (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiological Ecology of Overwintering and Cold-Adapted Arthropods
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Entomology Entomology 2020 Physiological Ecology of Overwintering and Cold-Adapted Arthropods Leslie Jean Potts University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2020.108 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Potts, Leslie Jean, "Physiological Ecology of Overwintering and Cold-Adapted Arthropods" (2020). Theses and Dissertations--Entomology. 53. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/entomology_etds/53 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Entomology by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless an embargo applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology, Ecology, and Evolving Management of Helicoverpa Zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Sweet Corn in the United States
    Journal of Economic Entomology, 109(4), 2016, 1667–1676 doi: 10.1093/jee/tow125 Advance Access Publication Date: 21 June 2016 Field and Forage Crops Review Biology, Ecology, and Evolving Management of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Sweet Corn in the United States Daniel L. Olmstead,1 Brian A. Nault, and Anthony M. Shelton Department of Entomology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, 630 W. North St., Geneva, NY 14456 ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]), 1Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Received 31 March 2016; Accepted 7 May 2016 Abstract Downloaded from The corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), is a polyphagous pest found throughout the United States, where it attacks many field and vegetable crops. Although H. zea has long been a traditional pest of sweet corn, its im- portance to this crop has increased dramatically over the past two decades. In this review, we summarize infor- mation critical for current and future management of H. zea in sweet corn production in the United States. First, we discuss the pest status of H. zea and its life history, including migration, infestation and larval development, http://jee.oxfordjournals.org/ diapause, overwintering, and abiotic factors that affect its biology. Next we describe monitoring methods, crop protection decision-making processes, chemical control options, and the use of genetic technologies for control of H. zea. Alternative H. zea management options including biological control, cultural controls, host plant resis- tance, and pheromone disruption are also reviewed. The role of climate change and its effects on H. zea and its ecology are discussed, as well as the recent invasion of its relative, Helicoverpa armigera (Hu¨bner), which is a major pest of corn in other parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowjackets, Bald-Faced Hornets, and Paper Wasps “
    HOMEOWNER Guide to by Edward Bechinski, Frank Merickel, Lyndsie Stoltman, and Hugh Homan BUL 852 Yellowjackets, Bald-Faced Hornets, and Paper Wasps “ . spring weather largely determines if we will have wasp problems or not in any given year. Cold, rainy weather during April and May reduces the likelihood” TABLE OF CONTENTS I. IDENTIFICATION . .3 - 7 Yellowjackets . .4 Western . .4 Common . .4 German . .5 Aerial . .5 Bald-faced hornets . .6 Paper wasps . .6 II. SEASONAL LIFE CYCLE . .7 Box: Saving Nests . .7 III. STING HAZARDS Localized, toxic and allergic reactions . .8 Box: Advice for encounters . .9 IV. MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES . .9 Personal protection . .10 Repellants . .10 Reduce access to food and water . .10 Nest destruction . .10 Traps . .11 Biological control . .12 Box: Poison bait . .12 Table 1 Commercial traps, attractants . .13 Insecticides How to select the right product . .13 Box: Safety precautions before you spray . .14 2 HOMEOWNER Guide to YELLOWJACKETS—WASPS IN THE VESPULA OR DOLICHOVESPULA GENERA—UNLIKE BEES—ARE SHINY AND BARE OF HAIR. THEY’RE ALSO SLEEKER THAN BEES. OF 11 SPECIES FOUND IN IDAHO, THESE FOUR ARE THE MOST COMMON. ALL CAN STING MULTIPLE TIMES. WESTERN YELLOWJACKET, Vespula pensyl- COMMON YELLOWJACKET, Vespula vulgaris, vanica, Idaho’s most abundant species, builds also builds underground nests around the underground nests in abandoned animal bur- yard. It feeds on insects but scavenges from rows, hollows under sidewalks, and crevices in picnics as insect prey becomes scarce. retaining walls. Papery nests: Underground. Papery nests: Underground. Picnic pest: Yes. Picnic pest: Yes. Photo © Neil Miller/Papilio/Corbis Photo from www.worsleyschool.net GERMAN YELLOWJACKET, Vespula AERIAL YELLOWJACKET, Dolichovespula germanica, an aggressive scavenger of meats arenaria, mostly builds nests above ground and sweet drinks, poses high sting hazard.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Distribution of Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Host Strains in Agricultural and Turf Grass Habitats
    Exhibit 8b, #57 POPULATION ECOLOGY Seasonal Distribution of Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Host Strains in Agricultural and Turf Grass Habitats 1 ROD N. NAGOSHI AND ROBERT L. MEAGHER Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Gainesville, FL 32608 Environ. Entomol. 33(4): 881Ð889 (2004) ABSTRACT Male fall armyworm moths[ Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith)] were captured in pheromone traps over a 16- to 24-mo period in selected sites in southern Florida. Molecular markers were used to determine whether individuals were of one of two host strains (historically designated “rice-strain” and “corn-strain”). Trapsplaced in agricultural areasshoweda population peak in the spring (MarchÐMay) and fall (OctoberÐDecember), with a prolonged decline in numbers in summer (JulyÐOctober) and a smaller reduction in mid-winter (January). The host strain distribution during these periods varied signiÞcantly, suggesting strain-speciÞc and seasonal population patterns. Both strains were captured in substantial numbers during the spring peak, but surprisingly, only the rice-strain showed an increase in capture rates during the fall, despite the presence of sweet corn throughout this period. Trap captures in a sod (turfgrass) farm were composed almost entirely of the rice-strain and showed a bimodal seasonal distribution similar to that seen in the agricultural areas, with peaks in the spring and fall. These results represent the Þrst indication that the two host strains might have substantially different population dynamics in the overwintering agricultural areas of Florida and suggest that the rice-strain is the predominant fall armyworm pest during the fall and winter growing periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator Biology and Habitat
    POLLINATOR BIOLOGY AND HABITAT New England Pollinator Handbook November 2009 Prepared by the USDA NRCS Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island State Offices, the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation’s Pollinator Conservation Program, and the University of Maine Cooperative Extension. Introduction This handbook provides information on how to plan for, protect, and create habitat for pollinators in agricultural settings. Pollinators are an integral part of our environment and our agricultural systems; they are important in 35% of global crop production. Animal pollinators include bees, butterflies, moths, wasps, flies, beetles, ants, bats and hummingbirds. This handbook focuses on native bees, the most important Sweat bee (Agapostemon sp.). Photo: Toby pollinators in temperate North America, but Alexander, Vermont NRCS. also addresses the habitat needs of $3 billion worth of crop pollination annually butterflies and, to a lesser degree, other to the U.S. economy. beneficial insects. Natural areas on and close to farms can Worldwide, there are an estimated 20,000 serve as refugia for native wild pollinators. species of bees, with approximately 4,000 Protecting, enhancing or providing habitat is species native to the United States. The non- the best way to conserve native pollinators native European honey bee (Apis mellifera) and, at the same time, provide pollen and is the most important crop pollinator in the nectar resources that support local honey United States. However, the number of bees. On farms with sufficient natural honey bee colonies is in decline because of habitat, native pollinators can provide all of disease and other factors, making native the pollination for some crops.
    [Show full text]