Bhairahawa – Bhumahi Road Upgrading Sub- Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bhairahawa – Bhumahi Road Upgrading Sub- Project GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF PHYSICAL PLANNING & WORKS DEPARTMENT OF ROADS PROJECT DIRECTORATE (ADB) FINAL REPORT (Updated: January 2007) Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan for Bhairahawa – Bhumahi Road Upgrading Sub- Project Public consultation in Jamuwad, Nawalparasi Public consultation in Sidharthanagar Chamber of Public consultation Commerce and Industry Hall, Rupandehi in Basantapur VDC, Rupandehi SUBREGIONAL TRANSPORT FACILITATION PROJECT LOAN No. 2097-NEP (SF) Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan Project Directorate (ADB)/Department of Roads/MPPW Bhairahawa - Bhumahi Road Sub-Project Table of Contents Chapter I: PROJECT BACKGROUND AND SCOPE.............................................................................. I- 1 1.1 Project Description ...................................................................................................................... I-1 1.2 The Project Region ..................................................................................................................... I-4 1.3 Scope and Rationale for Land Acquisition.................................................................................. I-5 1.4 Alternative Options and Measures Considered to Minimize Resettlement Impacts................... I-5 1.5 Primary Responsibility for Land Acquisition and Resettlement .................................................. I-6 1.6 Objectives of the Resettlement Plan........................................................................................... I-6 1.7 Resettlement Policy, Principles and Guidelines ......................................................................... I-7 1.8 Community Response................................................................................................................. I-8 Chapter II: APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY..................................................................................... II-1 2.1 Objectives .................................................................................................................................. II-1 2.2 Legal and Policy Requirement ................................................................................................... II-1 2.3 Approach and Methodology ....................................................................................................... II-1 Chapter III: PROJECT IMPACTS AND RESETTLEMENT .................................................................... III-1 3.1 Land Acquisition........................................................................................................................ III-1 3.2 Types of Losses ........................................................................................................................ III-2 3.3 Impacts on Land........................................................................................................................ III-2 3.4 Loss of Structures ..................................................................................................................... III-5 3.5 Traffic Impact ............................................................................................................................ III-7 3.6 Affect on Households/ People................................................................................................... III-8 3.7 Gender, HIV/AIDS, Health Risks and Human Trafficking....................................................... III-14 3.8 Design Benefits ....................................................................................................................... III-16 3.9 Other Benefits ......................................................................................................................... III-16 3.10 Entitlement of Compensation.................................................................................................. III-17 3.11 Compensation on Loss of Businesses / Income..................................................................... III-17 Chapter IV: RESETTLEMENT PRINCIPLES, POLICY FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES.................IV-1 4.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................IV-1 4.2 Resettlement Policy, Principles and Guidelines .......................................................................IV-1 4.3 Government Laws and ADB Policy Requirement .....................................................................IV-3 4.4 Community Consensus Valuation.............................................................................................IV-5 4.5 Compensation Valuation...........................................................................................................IV-5 4.6 Resettlement Principles and Entitlement .................................................................................IV-6 4.7 Entitlement Matrix .....................................................................................................................IV-8 Chapter V: PUBLIC CONSULTATION, COMMUNITY RESPONSE & PARTICIPATION......................V-1 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................V-1 5.2 Methods of Public Consultation .................................................................................................V-1 5.3 Findings......................................................................................................................................V-4 5.4 Continuation of Public Consultation, Participation and Disclosure ............................................V-6 5.5 Mechanism for Continuous Participation ...................................................................................V-7 5.6 Information Campaign and Future Plans ...................................................................................V-8 Chapter VI: IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK....................................................................................VI-1 6.1 Institutional Arrangement ..........................................................................................................VI-1 6.1.1 Department of Road / Project Directorate (ADB) / Project Implementation Unit / Sub-Project Implementation Unit ..................................................................................................................VI-2 6.1.2 Non-Government Organizations (NGO/s):................................................................................VI-3 6.1.3 Subproject Level Committee / Grievances Redress Committee and Grievances Redress Mechanism................................................................................................................................VI-7 6.2 Support to DOR in Resettlement ............................................................................................VI-11 6.3 Staff Training in Resettlement Implementation.......................................................................VI-11 6.4 Resettlement Databank...........................................................................................................VI-11 6.5 Disclosures and Consultation .................................................................................................VI-12 Subregional Transport Facilitation Project i Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan Project Directorate (ADB)/Department of Roads/MPPW Bhairahawa - Bhumahi Road Sub-Project 6.6 The Resettlement Plan Implementation Process....................................................................VI-12 6.7 Training ...................................................................................................................................VI-13 6.7.1 Training for NGO Personnel ...................................................................................................VI-13 6.7.2 Training of Aps ........................................................................................................................VI-13 6.7.3 Training Mechanism................................................................................................................VI-14 6.8 Implementation Schedule........................................................................................................VI-14 6.9 Income Restoration Measures ................................................................................................VI-16 6.10 Resettlement Budget and Cost Estimates ..............................................................................VI-19 6.11 Compensation Valuation for Land...........................................................................................VI-20 Chapter VII: MONITORING AND EVALUATION...................................................................................VII-1 7.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................VII-1 7.2 Internal and External Monitoring ..............................................................................................VII-2 7.3 External Monitoring and Evaluation .........................................................................................VII-3 7.4 Methodology for Monitoring .....................................................................................................VII-4 7.5 Monitoring Project Input and Outputs ......................................................................................VII-4 7.6 Set of Key Monitors
Recommended publications
  • Determinants of Maternal Health and Family Planning Service Coverage in Nepal: Modelling of Routine Data
    Determinants of Maternal Health and Family Planning Service Coverage in Nepal: Modelling of Routine Data Government of Nepal Ministry of Health and Population Department of Health Services Teku, Kathmandu October 2020 Disclaimer: This analysis was carried out under the aegis of Integrated Health Information Management Section (IHIMS), Management Division, Department of Health Services (DoHS), Ministry of Health and Population (MoHP). This analysis is made possible with the UKaid through the Nepal Health Sector Programme 3 (NHSP3), Monitoring, Evaluation and Operational Research (MEOR) project and by the generous support of the American people through United States Agency for International Development (USAID)’s Strengthening Systems for Better Health (SSBH) Activity. The content of this report is produced by IHIMS, Abt Associates Inc., SSBH program and NHSP3, MEOR project. The views expressed in the report are of those who contributed to carry out and complete the analysis and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government and British Embassy Kathmandu or the UK Government. Additional information about the analysis may be obtained from the IHIMS, Management Division, DoHS, MoHP, Teku Kathmandu; Telephone: +977-1-4257765; internet: http://www.mddohs.gov.np; or UKaid/NHSP3/MEOR project, email: [email protected]. Recommended Citation Department of Health Services (DoHS), Ministry of Health and Population (MoHP), Nepal; UKaid Nepal Health Sector Programme 3 (NSHP3)/Monitoring, Evaluation and Operational Research
    [Show full text]
  • District Public Health Office, Rupandehi of the Year FY 2070/071
    Government of Nepal Ministry of Health and Population Phone: 071-520260 Department of Health Services 071-520142 071-525331 Western Region Health Directorate Fax: 071-520840 District Public Health Office Email: [email protected] Rupandehi Acknowledgement It is my great pleasure to publish the Annual Report of District Public Health Office, Rupandehi of the year FY 2070/071. This report is the summary of performance of each program with trend analysis of last 3 fiscal years' services provided by the health facilities (SHPs, HPs, PHCs, and Hospitals), PHCs/ORCs, EPI Clinics, I/NGOs and Nursing homes and private and teaching hospitals. This report is prepared with untiring efforts and co-operation of many institution and individuals. I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to Mr. Bal Krishna Bhusal, Director of Western Regional Health Directorate (WRHD), Pokhara for his valuable direction and guidance provided during district level monitoring visits in different time periods. My sincere thanks go to Mr. Rishi Ram Sigdel, Statistical Officer of WRHD and Mr. Mukti Khanal, Section Chief from Department of Health Services, Mgmt Division, HMIS section for their technical assistance on time and again and in particular during annual review meeting. Additionally, I take this opportunity to express appreciation to all DPHO Supervisors including Admin and Finance staff, Health Workers, Local bodies, Volunteers (FCHVs), Health Facility Management Committees, District level partners working for the quality assurance and enhancement of health services. I would like to thank Mr. Prayash Khanal, Executive Director of Unity for Sustainable Community Development and SUAAHARA program (Rupandehi) team, Mr. Dinesh Poudyal, Team Leader of Namuna Integrated Development Council and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in Nepal—An Overview
    Water 2011, 3, 1-20; doi:10.3390/w3010001 OPEN ACCESS water ISSN 2073-4441 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Review Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in Nepal—An Overview Jay Krishna Thakur 1,2,*, Rinku Kumari Thakur 2, AL Ramanathan 3, Manish Kumar 4 and Sudhir Kumar Singh 5 1 Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Hengelosestraat 99, 7514 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands 2 Health and Environmental Management Society, Barhari Bazar, Bengadabur-6, Dhanush, Nepal; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Schools of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi -110067, India; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Departments of Urban Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Science, University of Allahabad, Katra, Allahabad-211001, India; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected]; Mob.: +49-17645387019. Received: 26 November 2010; / Accepted: 23 December 2010 / Published: 29 December 2010 Abstract: In Nepal, arsenic (As) contamination is a major issue of current drinking water supply systems using groundwater and has recently been one of the major environmental health management issues especially in the plain region, i.e., in the Terai districts, where the population density is very high. The Terai inhabitants still use hand tube and dug wells (with hand held pumps that are bored at shallow to medium depth) for their daily water requirements, including drinking water. The National Sanitation Steering Committee (NSSC), with the help of many other organizations, has completed arsenic blanket test in 25 districts of Nepal by analysing 737,009 groundwater samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Gandaki Province
    2020 PROVINCIAL PROFILES GANDAKI PROVINCE Surveillance, Point of Entry Risk Communication and and Rapid Response Community Engagement Operations Support Laboratory Capacity and Logistics Infection Prevention and Control & Partner Clinical Management Coordination Government of Nepal Ministry of Health and Population Contents Surveillance, Point of Entry 3 and Rapid Response Laboratory Capacity 11 Infection Prevention and 19 Control & Clinical Management Risk Communication and Community Engagement 25 Operations Support 29 and Logistics Partner Coordination 35 PROVINCIAL PROFILES: BAGMATI PROVINCE 3 1 SURVEILLANCE, POINT OF ENTRY AND RAPID RESPONSE 4 PROVINCIAL PROFILES: GANDAKI PROVINCE SURVEILLANCE, POINT OF ENTRY AND RAPID RESPONSE COVID-19: How things stand in Nepal’s provinces and the epidemiological significance 1 of the coronavirus disease 1.1 BACKGROUND incidence/prevalence of the cases, both as aggregate reported numbers The provincial epidemiological profile and population denominations. In is meant to provide a snapshot of the addition, some insights over evolving COVID-19 situation in Nepal. The major patterns—such as changes in age at parameters in this profile narrative are risk and proportion of females in total depicted in accompanying graphics, cases—were also captured, as were which consist of panels of posters the trends of Test Positivity Rates and that highlight the case burden, trend, distribution of symptom production, as geographic distribution and person- well as cases with comorbidity. related risk factors. 1.4 MAJOR Information 1.2 METHODOLOGY OBSERVATIONS AND was The major data sets for the COVID-19 TRENDS supplemented situation updates have been Nepal had very few cases of by active CICT obtained from laboratories that laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 till teams and conduct PCR tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Integration in REDD+ and the ERPD in Nepal
    Gender Integration in REDD+ and the ERPD in Nepal ASSESSMENT REPORT AND GENDER ACTION PLAN Prepared by Women Organizing for Change in Agriculture and Natural Resource Management For Forest Carbon Partnership Facility/World Bank June 2017 Kathmandu, Nepal Acknowledgements We are grateful for the time and knowledge contributed by the following individuals and organizations: • REDD-IC: Dr. Sindhu P. Dhungana – Chief REDD-IC (for overall support, guidance; coordination within the ministry as well as with the districts, and providing a full-time staff and coordination); Ms. SriJana Shrestha – Asst. Forest officer and Gender Focal Point – for coordination, field work and analysis; • Gender Focal Points of the MoFSC and its five departments, and all professional women staff of the forest sector for frankly sharing their views, issues, challenges and suggestions. • District Forest Officers for their help with coordination, and providing information and in some cases staff (Nawalparasi, Bara, Bardiya, Kailali, Dang, Kapilvastu and Dolakha districts) • HIMAWANTI central and district chapters for coordination of field visits and feedback; • District level CSOs and NGOs – NGO Federation, Tharu Kalyan, NEFIN, MMBKSS, HIMAWANTI, Community Forest Association, Private Forest Association, • Members of CFUGs, Collaborative Forest, Buffer Zone and Leasehold Forestry User Groups, including members of different natural resource management-related user groups for help with community level FGDs and interviews • Women’s groups, saving and credit groups and cooperatives,
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking Adaptation and Measuring Development (TAMD) in Nepal Quarter 2 Report - Feasibility Testing Phase
    September 2013 Tracking Adaptation and Measuring Development (TAMD) in Nepal Quarter 2 Report - Feasibility testing phase DR A F T T racking Adaptation and Measuring Development (T A M D) Project Nepal: Second Quarter Report (July ± September, 2013) * * *** *** *** *** *** *** * * Prepared by Dr. Dinesh Chandra Devkota; Ms. Prabha Pokhrel; Mr. Jhank Narayan Shrestha; Mr. Anil Shrestha and Mr. Narayan Babu Joshi Submitted by: Integrated Development Society (IDS) - Nepal Kathmandu, September 2013 This report is prepared based on the selection of interventions and district for TAMD feasibility study in Nepal done by IDS-Nepal and submitted to IIED. It is based on exploratory field visit and meetings held with the key officials of Nawalparasi districts, Sukrauli Village Development Committee, two communities named Ghinaha and Nadiya tole and review of secondary information of the interventions and DDC/VDC. T A M D Coordination Committee Coordinator: Mr. Prakash Mathema (Chief, Climate Change Management Division / MoSTE) Members: Mr. Govinda Bahadur Shrestha (MoFSC); Mr. Chakrapani Sharma (MoFALD); Mr. Prahlad Prasad Sapkota (MoE); Ms. Ramita Manandhar (MoAD); Ms. Neeta Pokhrel (NPC); ISET Nepal; Dr. Susannah E. Fisher (IIED, UK); Ms. Prabha Pokhrel (IDS-Nepal). Member Secretary: Mr. Arjun Kumar Thapa (Chief, Climate Change Section / MoSTE) ii Executive Summary The TAMD feasibility study is to develop contextualized TAMD framework for Nepal to track climate change adaptation linkages with development interventions. This study is being conducted under the MoSTE/GoN in Nepal. In order to provide advice and guidance to the TAMD working team, the TAMD Coordination Committee (TCC) has been formed in MoSTE. The technical team had carried out the scoping of potential interventions including vulnerability assessment of the districts and produced report in the first quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • (GAP) by the Banana Farmers of Chitwan, Nepal
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.12.148551; this version posted June 12, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. TOPIC: APPLICATION OF GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES (GAP) BY THE BANANA FARMERS OF CHITWAN, NEPAL Arati Joshia*, Dharmendra Kalaunia, Ujjal Tiwarib aFaculty of Agriculture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal bDepartment of Agri-Economics and Agri-business Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal *Corresponding author: [email protected] Arati Joshi is an agriculture graduate from Agriculture and Forestry University. Her area of interest includes agricultural economics, extension, gender studies and environmental science. She is currently working as an Agriculture Instructor. Dharmendra Kalauni is an agriculture graduate from Agriculture and Forestry University. His area of interest includes agricultural and applied economics and statistics. He is currently working as Agriculture Extension Officer. Ujjal Tiwari is an assistant professor of Department of Agri-Economics and Agri-business Management, Agriculture and Forestry University. ABSTRACT The paper was conducted to study the cultivation practices followed by the banana growers and compares it with the framework of Good Agricultural Practices as recommended by the World Banana Forum. Both qualitative and quantitative approach is used for data collection. The scheduled interview was carried out from 103 banana growers, two focused group discussion was carried out with the banana growers, and two key informant interview was carried out; one with the President of Banana Growers Association, Chitwan and another with Executive Director of Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Chitwan.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Pro-Poor and Gender Responsive Service Delivery Project
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 38059 January 2007 Nepal: Promoting Pro-Poor and Gender Responsive Service Delivery Project {(Financed by the <source of funding>)} Prepared by Lava Kumar Thapa For the Department of Women Development and Asian Development Bank This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. TA 4353 NEP PROMOTING PRO-POOR AND GENDER RESPONSIVE SERVICE DELIVERY PROJECT Completion Report (16 June 2005- 30 November 2006) by Lava Kumar Thapa Project Advisor Report Prepared for the Department of Women Development and Asian Development Bank January 2007 List of abbreviations used ADB Asian Development Bank APF advance payment facility CBC Community Based Committee CBO Community-based Organization CCDC Chhahari Community Development Centre CLDP Community Livestock Development Project CPN-Maoist Communist Party of Nepal - Maoist CTRD Committed Team for Rural Development DADO District Agriculture Development Office DDC District Development Committee DLS Department of Livestock Services DLSO District Livestock Services Office DOA Department of Agriculture DWD Department of Women Development GMCC Gender Mainstreaming Coordination Committee GON Government of Nepal IFCD Indreni Forum for Community Development IGA Income-generating activity MLD Ministry of Local Development MOAC Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives MWCSW Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare NECS Nepal Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Progress Report FY 2070/71
    A joint programme of the Government of Nepal in collaboration with the Government of Finland, Switzerland, and the UK Multi Stakeholder Forestry Programme (MSFP) Western Terai Lot III (Nawalparasi, Rupandehi and Kapilvastu) Annual Progress Progress Report F.Y. 070/71 (Reporting Period 16 July 2013 - 16 July 2014) Submitted by Resource Identification and Management Society (RIMS), Nepal P.O. Box 2464, Kathmandu Tel. No: 5537613 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rimsnepal.org Annual Progress Report FY 2070/71 Table of Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 1 Basic Information ................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Strategic Review and Outlook ................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Way Forward ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.3.1 Snapshot of Nepal .................................................................................................................. 6 1.3.2 Introduction of Implementing Agency: RIMS Nepal .............................................................. 6 1.3.3 Implementation of Multi Stakeholder
    [Show full text]
  • SAMBAD: Dialogue for Peace Project
    SAMBAD: Dialogue for Peace Project BASELINE SURVEY REPORT Submitted to: CARE Nepal Regional Office Bharatpur, Chitwan Submitted by: Bijay Kumar Singh, Ph.D. Kathmandu, Nepal Email: [email protected] January 2014 Study Team Bijay Kumar Singh, Ph.D. Team Leader (Consultant) Mr. Santos Kumar Shah Statistician SAMBAD/CARE Nepal Team Ms. Nirmala Sharma Program Coordinator. CARE Nepal Mr. Madhav P. Dhakal Project Manager, SAMBAD/ CARE Nepal Ms. Bimala Puri Community Dialogue Officer, SAMBAD/ CARE Nepal Mr. Bishnu Nepali Monitoring and Evaluation Office, SAMBAD/ CARE Nepal Mr. Amleshwar Singh Impact Measurement and Learning Manager, CARE Nepal Partner NGO Team Ms. Mibusha Ghimire District Project Coordinator, LARC Mr. Madan Prajapati Field Supervisor, NAMUNA Ms. Chandani Chhetri Finance Assistant, NAMUNA Mr. Rajesh K. Chaudhary Finance Assistant, LARC Field Data Collectors LARC, Nawalparasi Ms. Sarita Adhikari Ms. Phoolmaya Paswan Ms. Menka Shree Rajkumari Mr. Ramhari Dusadh Mr. Ravi Shanker Harijan NAMUNA, Rupandehi Ms. Sonika Shrestha Mr. Jeewan B.K. Mr. Mukunda Paudyal Ms. Bindramati Chaudhary Mr. Dinesh Aryal Special Contribution in the Baseline Survey for Data Collection Mr. Prem Nath Gyawali - LPC Secretary, Rupandehi Ms. Anjana Acharya - LPC Secretary, Nawalparasi Acknowledgements The Team Leader would like to express his gratitude to CARE Nepal for the opportunity given again to serve the organization. He would like to extend his sincere thanks to Officials of CARE Nepal Mr. Madhav P. Dhakal, Ms. Nirmala Sharma, Mr. Amleshwar Singh, Ms. Bimala Puri, Mr. Bishnu Nepali and Mr. Chuda Basnet for their kind cooperation and hearty support in successfully completion of the assignment on time. He would like to earnestly extend his special gratitude to Under Secretary Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Saath-Saath Project
    Saath-Saath Project Saath-Saath Project THIRD ANNUAL REPORT August 2013 – July 2014 September 2014 0 Submitted by Saath-Saath Project Gopal Bhawan, Anamika Galli Baluwatar – 4, Kathmandu Nepal T: +977-1-4437173 F: +977-1-4417475 E: [email protected] FHI 360 Nepal USAID Cooperative Agreement # AID-367-A-11-00005 USAID/Nepal Country Assistance Objective Intermediate Result 1 & 4 1 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Program Management ........................................................................................................................... 6 III. Technical Program Elements (Program by Outputs) .............................................................................. 6 Outcome 1: Decreased HIV prevalence among selected MARPs ...................................................................... 6 Outcome 2: Increased use of Family Planning (FP) services among MARPs ................................................... 9 Outcome 3: Increased GON capacity to plan, commission and use SI ............................................................ 14 Outcome
    [Show full text]
  • CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: a RAPID ASSESSMENT Published in August 2013 by WWF Nepal
    Hariyo Ban Program CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: A RAPID ASSESSMENT Published in August 2013 by WWF Nepal Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. Citation: WWF Nepal 2013. Chitwan Annapurna Landscape (CHAL): A Rapid Assessment, Nepal, August 2013 Cover photo: © Neyret & Benastar / WWF-Canon Gerald S. Cubitt / WWF-Canon Simon de TREY-WHITE / WWF-UK James W. Thorsell / WWF-Canon Michel Gunther / WWF-Canon WWF Nepal, Hariyo Ban Program / Pallavi Dhakal Disclaimer This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Kathmandu Forestry College (KAFCOL) and do not necessarily reflect the views of WWF, USAID or the United States Government. © WWF Nepal. All rights reserved. WWF Nepal, PO Box: 7660 Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal T: +977 1 4434820, F: +977 1 4438458 [email protected] www.wwfnepal.org/hariyobanprogram Hariyo Ban Program CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: A RAPID ASSESSMENT Foreword With its diverse topographical, geographical and climatic variation, Nepal is rich in biodiversity and ecosystem services. It boasts a large diversity of flora and fauna at genetic, species and ecosystem levels. Nepal has several critical sites and wetlands including the fragile Churia ecosystem. These critical sites and biodiversity are subjected to various anthropogenic and climatic threats. Several bilateral partners and donors are working in partnership with the Government of Nepal to conserve Nepal’s rich natural heritage. USAID funded Hariyo Ban Program, implemented by a consortium of four partners with WWF Nepal leading alongside CARE Nepal, FECOFUN and NTNC, is working towards reducing the adverse impacts of climate change, threats to biodiversity and improving livelihoods of the people in Nepal.
    [Show full text]