Divergent Receptor Proteins Confer Responses to Different Karrikins in Two Ephemeral Weeds
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hamamelis.Pdf
Amer. J. Bot. 77(1): 77-91. 1990. COMPARATIVE ONTOGENY OF THE INFLORESCENCE AND FLOWER OF HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA AND LOROPETALUM CHINENSE (HAMAMELIDACEAE)' Department of Plant Biology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824 A B S T R A C T A comparative developmental study of the inflorescence and flower of Hamamelis L. (4- merous) and Loropetalum (R. Br.) Oliv. (4-5 merous) was conducted to determine how de- velopment differs in these genera and between these genera and others of the family. Emphasis was placed on determining the types of floral appendages from which the similarly positioned nectaries of Hamamel~sand sterile phyllomes of Loropetalum have evolved. In Hamamelis virginiana L. and H. mollis Oliv. initiation of whorls of floral appendages occurred centripetally. Nectary primordia arose adaxial to the petals soon after the initiation of stamen primordia and before initiation of carpel primordia. In Loropetalum chinense (R. Br.) Oliv. floral appendages did not arise centripetally. Petals and stamens first arose on the adaxial portion, and then on the abaxial portion of the floral apex. The sterile floral appendages (sterile phyllomes of uncertain homology) were initiated adaxial to the petals after all other whorls of floral appendages had become well developed. In all three species, two crescent shaped carpel primordia arose opposite each other and became closely appressed at their margins. Postgenital fusion followed and a falsely bilocular, bicarpellate ovary was formed. Ovule position and development are described. The nectaries ofHamamelisand sterile phyllomes of Loropetalum rarely develop as staminodia, suggesting a staminodial origin. However, these whorls arise at markedly different times and are therefore probably not derived from the same whorl of organs in a common progenitor. -
Phytophthora Ramorum Sudden Oak Death Pathogen
NAME OF SPECIES: Phytophthora ramorum Sudden Oak Death pathogen Synonyms: Common Name: Sudden Oak Death pathogen A. CURRENT STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION I. In Wisconsin? 1. YES NO X 2. Abundance: 3. Geographic Range: 4. Habitat Invaded: 5. Historical Status and Rate of Spread in Wisconsin: 6. Proportion of potential range occupied: II. Invasive in Similar Climate YES NO X Zones United States: In 14 coastal California Counties and in Curry County, Oregon. In nursery in Washington. Canada: Nursery in British Columbia. Europe: Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Poland, Spain, France, Belgium, and Sweden. III. Invasive in Similar Habitat YES X NO Types IV. Habitat Affected 1. Habitat affected: this disease thrives in cool, wet climates including areas in coastal California within the fog belt or in low- lying forested areas along stream beds and other bodies of water. Oaks associated with understory species that are susceptible to foliar infections are at higher risk of becoming infected. 2. Host plants: Forty-five hosts are regulated for this disease. These hosts have been found naturally infected by P. ramorum and have had Koch’s postulates completed, reviewed and accepted. Approximately fifty-nine species are associated with Phytophthora ramorum. These species are found naturally infected; P. ramorum has been cultured or detected with PCR but Koch’s postulates have not been completed or documented and reviewed. Northern red oak (Quercus rubra) is considered an associated host. See end of document for complete list of plant hosts. National Risk Model and Map shows susceptible forest types in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. -
Native Plant Catalog
native plant catalog HERBACEOUS PLANTS Page 1 Botanical Name Common Name Color Bloom Light Soil Height Agastache 'Black Adder' Hyssop Violet-Blue June-Sept Full Sun M-D 2-3' Fragrant flowers attract bees, butterflies, and hummingbirds; Compact and good for containers; Deer resistant. Allium cernuum Nodding Onion Lt Pink May-June Sun-Pt Shade D 12-18” Attracts bees and butterflies; perfect for rocky soils; tolerates drought once established. Amsonia 'Blue Ice' Blue Star Dark Blue Apr-May Sun-Pt Shade M 12-15" Attracts hummingbirds, bees, and butterflies; foliage turns golden yellow in fall, adding stunning color to the garden. Amsonia tab. var. salicifolia Eastern Bluestar Lt Blue Apr-May Sun-Pt Shade M 2-3’ Attracts bees and butterflies; tolerates clay soil and drought; attractive yellow fall color. Stake in moist soils. Aquilegia canadensis Wild Columbine Red and Yellow Apr-May Part Shade M-D 1-3' Attracts hummingbirds and butterflies; self sows in woodland garden. Tolerates dry soil and deer. Arisaema triphyllum Jack-in-the-Pulpit Green/Maroon Apr-June Shade M 1-2' Bright red berry cluster in fall provides food for birds, mammals, and turtles. A true specimen plant for the woodland garden. Asarum canadense Wild Ginger Maroon May-June Shade M 6" Alternate larval host plant for pipevine swallowtail butterfly; a wonderful slow-spreading groundcover for deep shade. Asclepias incarnata Swamp Milkweed Rose-Pink July-Sept Full Sun M-W 3-5’ Larval host for monarch butterfly; attracts bees, butterflies, and hummingbirds; a good choice for rain gardens; tolerates clay soils. Asclepias syriaca Common Milkweed Pale Pink July-Sept Full Sun M-D 2-4' Larval host for monarch butterfly; attracts bees, butterflies and hummingbirds; tolerates clay soils. -
Morton Virginia Sweetspire – Scarlet Beauty™ Itea Virginica ‘Morton’
CHICAGOLAND GROWS®, INC. Plant Introduction Program - Plant Release Bulletin #28 Morton Virginia Sweetspire – Scarlet Beauty™ Itea virginica ‘Morton’ The Morton Virginia sweetspire is a summer-flowering shrub with excellent fall color. This selection has superior hardiness and a higher soil pH tolerance than other cultivars of the species. An easy-to-grow native shrub selected from the collections at The Morton Arboretum. Chicagoland Grows® is a nonprofit corporation of the Chicago Botanic Garden, The Morton Arboretum, and the Ornamental Growers Association of Northern Illinois (OGA). Morton Virginia Sweetspire – Scarlet Beauty™ Itea virginica ‘Morton’ Botanical Name Ornamental Characteristics Itea virginica ‘Morton’ The white flowers are densely borne on numerous pendant 3-inch-long inflorescences that are produced from mid-June Common Name to early July, when few other shrubs are in bloom. The flowers Morton Virginia Sweetspire have a faint but pleasing fragrance and are attractive to butterflies. Medium-green foliage all summer changes to deep Family orange-red to red-purple in autumn, peaking in early November Iteaceae and persisting through a very hard frost. In milder climates, the colorful foliage can persist much of the winter. The stems can Origin also turn a pleasing red color during winter months. Selected in 1999 by Kris Bachtell of The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, from a plant that has been in the Arboretum’s Culture collection since the late 1950s. The species is native throughout Best grown on moist to wet soils with ample organic matter. the southeastern United States, from coastal Florida north to As with most selections of Virginia sweetspire, ‘Morton’ prefers New Jersey and from eastern Texas north into southern Illinois. -
1995 New Zealand Botanical Society
NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 42 DECEMBER 1995 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Jessica Beever Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright Committee: Catherine Beard, Colin Webb, Carol West, Beverley Clarkson, Bruce Clarkson Address: C/- Auckland Institute & Museum Private Bag 92018 AUCKLAND Subscriptions The 1996 ordinary and institutional subs are $14 (reduced to $10 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 1996 student sub, available to full-time students, is $7 (reduced to $5 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each - from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 41 (September 1995). Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February of each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next year's subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the March 1996 issue (Number 43) is 28 February 1996. Please forward contributions to: Bruce & Beverley Clarkson, Editors NZ Botanical Society Newsletter 7 Lynwood Place HAMILTON Contributions may be provided on floppy disc (preferably in Word Perfect 5.1) or by e-mail ([email protected]). NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 42 DECEMBER 1995 CONTENTS News New Zealand Botanical Society News From the Secretary 2 Regional Botanical Society News Nelson Botanical Society . -
Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 ON THE COVER Duck potato (Sagittaria latifolia) at Ocmulgee National Monument. Photograph by: Sarah C. Heath, SECN Botanist. Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 Sarah Corbett Heath1 Michael W. Byrne2 1USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia 31558 2USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Road Athens, Georgia 30605 September 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. -
Woody Shrubs for Stormwater Retention Practices 1 TABLE of CONTENTS
Woody Shrubs for Stormwater Retention Practices School of Integrative Plant Science, Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Regions Horticulture Section Second Edition Ethan M. Dropkin, Nina Bassuk and Trevan Signorelli Woody Shrubs for Stormwater Retention Practices 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS What is Stormwater? ................................................................................... 3 Stormwater Issues ....................................................................................... 4 Combined Sewer Overflow......................................................................... 5 Municipal, State and Federal Stormwater Regulations ............................ 6 Stormwater Infiltration Practices ............................................................... 6 Why Use Plants? .......................................................................................... 7 What Plants are Best? ................................................................................. 8 Site Assessment .......................................................................................... 9 Site Assessment Checklist ......................................................................... 12 Design Consideration Prior to Plant Selection ......................................... 13 Establishment .............................................................................................. 14 Maintenance ................................................................................................. 15 Plant Selection ............................................................................................ -
Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project. -
Newsletter No. 334– December 2017
Newsletter No. 334– December 2017 NOVEMBER MEETING Plant Auction magnificent flowers occur in Spring. It is a cross-bred species, first found in Doug McKenzie’s garden in Our November meeting took the form of a ‘Rare Ocean Grove. and Unusual Plant’ auction. Although there were few members present, auctioneer Frank Scheelings, kept the crowd entertained with his lively banter and unique style. Sue McDonald was a ferocious bidder, as was Roy Whiteside. Arthur Pape’s strategy was to bid at the very end and steal a plant from the grips of someone else - but the night was quite successful and a great time was had by all. Olearia adenophora - Scented Daisy Bush This is a rare plant from the Gippsland region of south-eastern Victoria. It grows to 1m high x 1m wide and will grow in acidic, neutral or alkaline soils. It is drought resistant and frost tolerant. It prefers full sun or partial shade and produces flowers in Spring to Summer. Frank in full flow Thanks to those members who grew or sourced the plants, and to those who bid, the club raised almost $300 on the night. Thanks to Nicole Leach for her Powerpoint presentation of each plant, some of which appears below. Darwinia leiostyla - ‘Coolamon Pink’ is an attractive plant which grows to 1m high x 1m wide. It is best cultured in pots. It is frost tolerant and prefers a sunny position but grows well in shade. Its President: Matt Baars - [email protected] Secretary: Bruce McGinness – [email protected] Treasurer: Frank Scheelings – [email protected] Editor: Ade Foster - [email protected] Australian Plants Society – Geelong P.O. -
Illustration Sources
APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission. -
Hamamelis Virginiana L. Witch Hazelhorsetail
The Herb Society of America ’ s Notable Native™ Herbal Shrub/Tree 2020 Hamamelis virginiana L. Witch hazelHorsetail Family: Hamamelidaceae (Witch hazel family) Latin Name: Hamamelis virginiana L. Common Name: Witch hazel, American witchhazel Growth: Shrub/small tree to 20’, deciduous Hardiness: Zones 3-9; temperate deciduous forests Light: Full to partial sun Soil: Rich, slightly acid, well-draining soil Water: Moderate moisture levels Use: Medicinal; fragrant flowers; divining rods for well-witching Propagation: Seeds; layering in spring or autumn; softwood cuttings Hamamelis virginiana, Witch hazel. ©Katherine Schlosser,11-06-2017 History & Description Americans believed witch hazel was The genus Hamamelis (from the Greek hama a magical plant because it defied the usual = together and melon= fruit, ie, flowers and order of nature, blooming just when other fruits at the same time) comprises three plants are preparing for winter. North American species (H. virginiana, H. vernalis, H. ovalis) and two Asian species Culture & Habitat (H. mollis, H. japonica). The genus received Witch hazel is found on a variety of sites but its name from Linnaeus who noted its habit is most abundant in mesic woods and of blooming and fruiting at the same time. bottoms. In the western and southern parts of its range, it is found in moist cool valleys, A cross between the two Asian species (H. x moist flats, on north and east slopes, in intermedia) is used by nurseries to produce coves, and ravines. In the northern part of cultivars that flower in yellow to pinks, reds, its range, it is found on drier and warmer and purples. -
(Saxifragaceae), Using Genome Skimming Data Luxian Liu1†, Yuewen Wang1†, Peizi He1, Pan Li2* , Joongku Lee3, Douglas E
Liu et al. BMC Genomics (2018) 19:235 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4633-x RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Chloroplast genome analyses and genomic resource development for epilithic sister genera Oresitrophe and Mukdenia (Saxifragaceae), using genome skimming data Luxian Liu1†, Yuewen Wang1†, Peizi He1, Pan Li2* , Joongku Lee3, Douglas E. Soltis4 and Chengxin Fu2 Abstract Background: Epilithic sister genera Oresitrophe and Mukdenia (Saxifragaceae) have an epilithic habitat (rocky slopes) and a parapatric distribution in East Asia, which makes them an ideal model for a more comprehensive understanding of the demographic and divergence history and the influence of climate changes in East Asia. However, the genetic background and resources for these two genera are scarce. Results: The complete chloroplast (cp) genomes of two Oresitrophe rupifraga and one Mukdenia rossii individuals were reconstructed and comparative analyses were conducted to examine the evolutionary pattern of chloroplast genomes in Saxifragaceae. The cp genomes ranged from 156,738 bp to 156,960 bp in length and had a typical quadripartite structure with a conserved genome arrangement. Comparative analysis revealed the intron of rpl2 has been lost in Heuchera parviflora, Tiarella polyphylla, M. rossii and O. rupifraga but presents in the reference genome of Penthorum chinense. Seven cp hotspot regions (trnH-psbA, trnR-atpA, atpI-rps2, rps2-rpoC2, petN-psbM, rps4-trnT and rpl33-rps18) were identified between Oresitrophe and Mukdenia, while four hotspots (trnQ-psbK, trnR-atpA, trnS-psbZ and rpl33-rps18) were identified within Oresitrophe. In addition, 24 polymorphic cpSSR loci were found between Oresitrophe and Mukdenia. Most importantly, we successfully developed 126 intergeneric polymorphic gSSR markers between Oresitrophe and Mukdenia, as well as 452 intrageneric ones within Oresitrophe.