The European Commission 2019-2024

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The European Commission 2019-2024 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 2019-2024 UPDATED OCTOBER 2020 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 2019-2024 On 27 November 2019, The European Parliament confirmed the new class of European Commissioners with 461 votes in favour, 157 against and 89 abstentions. The new President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, and her team of European Commissioners took office on 1 December 2019 and will drive the EU’s agenda for the next five years. President Von der Leyen, the former German defence minister, says that it will be a “geopolitical Commission,” signalling an intention to position Europe as a heavyweight on the world stage. Here Clifford Chance experts, including Of Counsel Michel Petite who worked for EU institutions for 27 years and was legal adviser to three Commission Presidents, assess the priorities for the von der Leyen Commission. The composition of the given oversight of major policy areas for Commission the EU. Frans Timmermans from the Netherlands is in charge of DG Climate Ursula von der Leyen is the first woman Action (CLIMA). Valdis Dombrovskis from to hold the position of President of the Latvia was given DG Financial Stability, European Commission. She urged Financial Services and Capital Markets Member States to nominate Union (FISMA), and replaces Phil Logan Commissioners that would allow her to on Trade. Margrethe Vestager from build a gender-balanced team. In this Denmark retains responsibility for DG respect, she has been successful. Competition (COMP). “This is a new Von der Leyen’s initial team of feature,” says Petite, “the appointment Commissioners was constituted of of three Executive Vice-Presidents signals 12 women and 15 men. This was already that the Commission will work through a the largest proportion of women of hard core of heavyweights, with a great any Commission, and a significant deal of experience, who will be at the improvement compared with forefront of all decisions taken.” Jean-Claude Juncker’s Commission, where the ratio of men to women was In contrast to her predecessor 2:1. Following the resignation of Phil Jean-Claude Juncker’s “political Hogan in August 2020, and his Commission” von der Leyen says that replacement as Ireland’s Commissioner the Commission will be “a guardian of by Mairead McGuinness, the proportion multilateralism,” as it deals with a range of women is even greater, 13 women to of challenges such as the continuing 14 men. Michel Petite says: “All the refugee crisis, an unpredictable and Commissioners have first class protectionist US, the rise of China and pro-European credentials, and the an increasingly hostile Russia. She has gender balance has been addressed, appointed a number of Commissioners – which is great.” including Margrethe Vestager, the former Commissioner for Competition who now President von der Leyen has also widens her portfolio to include tech. overhauled the structure of the In addition, she has created a new Commission. There are now eight department charged with overseeing Vice-Presidents, three of whom are defence and space policy, which Executive Vice-Presidents – Valdis Washington may regard as a challenge Dombrovskis, Frans Timmermans and to the US-led NATO alliance. Margrethe Vestager, representing the three largest political groups. These three new Executive Vice-Presidents have been 2 CLIFFORD CHANCE THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 2019-2024 Von der Leyen’s State of forward a strategy to strengthen LGBTQI the Union Address rights and push for mutual recognition of family relations in the EU, concluding: On 16 September 2020, President von “If you are a parent in one country, you der Leyen gave her first State of the are a parent in every country”. Union Address to the European Parliament. Unsurprisingly, the speech focused heavily on the Covid-19 A rocky start for the Von pandemic. Von der Leyen talked about der Leyen Commission strengthening the European Health After securing the top post in the Union, and committed to the creation of European Commission with a majority of a European BARDA, an agency for only nine votes from MEPs, von der biomedical advanced research and Leyen faced a number of set-backs development set up to improve EU before taking office. She suffered capacity and readiness to respond to numerous delays to the Commissioner crises such as Covid-19. confirmation procedure and, as a result, her class of Commissioners were delayed Among the other areas of focus were by one month in taking office, with the climate change and the digital economy. previous Commission staying on beyond Von der Leyen made new commitments their term in a “caretaker” capacity. She on the climate, increasing the 2030 target also received widespread criticism for her for emissions reduction from 40% to decision to create a portfolio for 55%, with a promise to revise European “protecting our European way of life”, climate and energy regulation in order to which she later changed to “promoting meet this target. The European the European way of life.” Parliament has subsequently backed an even more ambitious target of 60% Phil Hogan’s early exit – a emissions reductions. strategic loss for Ireland On the digital economy, von der Leyen Then, in August 2020, Ireland’s said she wanted to make this “Europe’s Commissioner Phil Hogan, in charge of digital decade”. She described Europe as trade, was forced to resign following a having been “too slow” on personal data political scandal. The Commissioner such that there is no common EU data attended a dinner (along with other space and we are now “dependent on notable Irish politicians) amidst others”, and set forth a plan to avoid the nationwide lockdown rules which were in same happening on industrial data. place because of the Covid-19 On artificial intelligence, she wants a “set pandemic. The media uproar that of rules that puts people at the centre”. followed led the Irish Taoiseach (Prime She also made commitments for the Minister), Micheál Martin and Tánaiste creation of a European e-identity, and on (Deputy Prime Minister) Leo Varadkar to improving connectivity, particularly in rural ask Hogan to “consider his position”, areas, as well as an investment of EUR 8 eventually bringing about his resignation. billion for the next generation of supercomputers. Hogan was yet to settle into the role of Trade Commissioner. Following the early On international relations, von der Leyen retirement of Roberto Azevêdo from the urged Member States to move away from role of Director General of the WTO, unanimity and towards qualified majority Hogan had toyed with the idea of putting “at least on human rights and sanctions his name forward to replace Azevêdo. implementation”, two areas where the EU Concerned by a potential conflict of has recently struggled to agree a interests, von der Leyen was forced to common position. impose restrictions on Hogan pending his decision, including restricting him from In her closing remarks, von der Leyen speaking publicly and requiring sign-off addressed the issue of equality. She from Executive Vice President Valdis talked of her desire to build a “a truly Dombrovskis on any trade policy anti-racist Union” and has committed to decisions. In the end, Hogan decided not appointing the Commission’s first-ever to apply, commenting that the “important anti-racism coordinator. She will also put EU Trade Agenda requires the full and CLIFFORD CHANCE 3 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 2019-2024 careful involvement of the European data strategy and there is already an Union and in particular, the Trade industrial policy for defence and space. Commissioner”. Less than two-months later, he had tendered his resignation. Thierry Breton France has been given an extremely As a result of Hogan’s resignation, Ireland important portfolio, bringing together two have lost the coveted Trade portfolio. DGs and creating a third to put Thierry Already an important policy area, it was Breton in charge of the internal market, especially significant for Ireland given the including the Digital Single Market (DSM), ongoing negotiations with the UK on a defence and space. The new DG future trade relationship. Ireland is the Defence Industry and Space has come UK’s closest neighbour and the only out of DG GROW, which had grown too country in Europe with a land border with big and unwieldy. It is also the first time the United Kingdom. Mairead that digital has been brought into the fold McGuinness, Phil Hogan’s replacement, of the internal market, emphasising the takes over on Financial Stability, Financial importance of creating a real DSM. Services and the Capital Markets Union. Valdis Dombrovskis Other notable Following Phil Hogan’s resignation, Valdis appointments Dombrovskis, one of von der Leyen’s Executive Vice Presidents, adds Trade to Margrethe Vestager his already broad economic portfolio, Her nomination as an Executive Vice- “An Economy that Works for People”. President is not only a reflection of her This is the first time that an Executive performance in the previous Commission, Vice President has been in charge of but also of the improved results of the Trade, indicating the growing importance Liberal group (Renew), which currently of trade for the Commission. includes seven heads of government Michel Petite says: “Dombrowski’s across the EU and won 108 seats in status and broad portfolio is impressive. May’s European Parliament elections. It reflects a new, holistic approach to the This is the first time a Competition EU economy, and a more political Commissioner has remained in post for a approach to the trade issues.” second term. In the past, it was considered too powerful and too sensitive a position to remain in the hands of the same person for two terms. What is not clear is how Vestager will manage the competition portfolio alongside the additional responsibility of leading on digital issues, a challenge which Vestager herself acknowledged in her hearing before the European Parliament.
Recommended publications
  • HESSEN Bevollmächtigte Des Landes Hessen Beim Bund
    Hessische Ministerin für Bundes- und Ref. Ares(2016)5579867Ref. Ares(2016)2247722 - 27/09/2016- 13/05/2016 Europaangelegenheiten und HESSEN Bevollmächtigte des Landes Hessen beim Bund Georg-August-Zinn-Straße 1 · 65183 Wiesbaden Mr Phil Hogan Member of the European Commission Rue de la Loi, 200 В- 1049 BRUXELLES 9th May 2016 Dear Commissioner Hogan, it is meanwhile traditional that the State of Hessen dedicates one evening in September on presenting its centuries-old tradition of winemaking and culinary specialties to a broad public in Brussels. This year, the 11th Hessian Wine Festival will take place on Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 7 pm at the Representation of the State of Hessen to the EU in Brussels. With our annual Wine Festival we bring together politicians, representatives from the EU- institutions and Member States, businessmen, academics, journalists and representatives of civil society in order to spend some pleasant moments apart from everyday business. As in past years we will welcome around 1000 guests. We look forward to taste a fine selection of local wines presented by winegrowers of the two Hessian wine growing areas (Rheingau and Hessische Bergstraße) and various local products with the label "Protected Designation of Origin" (PDO, PGI, TSG). It is also a tradition that the event is inaugurated by the Minister in charge of European Affairs and as highlight by a Member of the European Commission, such as in the past years the Commissioners Mariann Fischer Boel, Viviane Reding, Olli Rehn, Johannes Hahn and Günther H. Oettinger. Commissioner, last year unfortunately you could not follow our invitation to be our honorary guest of the Wine Festival.
    [Show full text]
  • Directorate-General for Competition 16/03/2021
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION – DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR COMPETITION 16/03/2021 Chief Economist Assistants 01 Commission Priorities and Tobias MAASS Pierre REGIBEAU Director-General Strategic Coordination Agata MAZURKIEWICZ Adviser Antitrust CE.1:Empirical analysis in complex CE.2: Economic analysis in Olivier GUERSENT merger and antitrust cases merger, antitrust and Astrid COUSIN HR Business Correspondent State aid cases Harold NYSSENS 1) Svend ALBAEK Pierre REGIBEAU f.f. Claes BENGTSSON (Deputy to the Director) Principal Adviser: Ex-post economic evaluation Thomas DEISENHOFER Adviser State aid Deputy Director-General Adviser Antitrust Deputy Director-General Deputy Director-General Pascal SCHLOESSLEN Adviser Mergers MERGERS & Cartels Henri PIFFAUT* Dirk VAN ERPS ANTITRUST STATE AID Olivier GUERSENT f.f. Linsey MCCALLUM Carles ESTEVA MOSSO A G R Policy and Strategy H Inge BERNAERTS Cartels Horizontal Management Maria JASPERS State aid: General Scrutiny and Maria VELENTZA Enforcement Adviser Consumer Liaison Ales MUSIL G/1 Cartels I Karl SOUKUP Corinne DUSSART-LEFRET A/1 Antitrust case support and (Deputy to the Director) R/1 Registry and Transparency Glykeria DEMATAKI policy G/2 Cartels II H/1 Infrastructure and Regional aid Sophie MOONEN Hubert DE BROCA Brigitta RENNER-LOQUENZ R/2 Finance and Internal Compliance A/2 Mergers case support and H/2 R&D&I, IPCEI Sari SUURNAKKI G/3 Cartels III (Deputy to the Director) policy Claudia DE CESARIS and environment Inge BERNAERTS f.f. Demos SPATHARIS (Deputy to the Director) R/3 Information technology G/4 Cartels IV Leontina SANDU A/3 State aid case support and Gerald MIERSCH policy H/3 Fiscal aid Karl SOUKUP f.f.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roots and Consequences of Euroskepticism: an Evaluation of the United Kingdom Independence Party
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship at UWindsor University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Political Science Publications Department of Political Science 4-2012 The roots and consequences of Euroskepticism: an evaluation of the United Kingdom Independence Party John B. Sutcliffe University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/poliscipub Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Sutcliffe, John B.. (2012). The roots and consequences of Euroskepticism: an evaluation of the United Kingdom Independence Party. Geopolitics, history and international relations, 4 (1), 107-127. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/poliscipub/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Political Science at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations Volume 4(1), 2012, pp. 107–127, ISSN 1948-9145 THE ROOTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF EUROSKEPTICISM: AN EVALUATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM INDEPENDENCE PARTY JOHN B. SUTCLIFFE [email protected] University of Windsor ABSTRACT. This article examines the causes and consequences of Euroskepticism through a study of the United Kingdom Independence Party. Based on an analysis of UKIP’s election campaigns, policies and performance, the article examines the roots of UKIP and its, potential, consequences for the British political system. The article argues that UKIP provides an example of Euroskepticism as the “politics of oppo- sition.” The party remains at the fringes of the political system and its leadership is prepared to use misrepresentation and populist rhetoric in an attempt to secure sup- port.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.6.2021 C(2021)
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.6.2021 C(2021) 3675 final ANNEX ANNEX to the Commission Implementing Decision adopting the Joint Research Centre’s work programme for 2021-2022 under Decision of the Council on establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, and Council Regulation (Euratom) establishing the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for the period 2021-2025 complementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation EN EN ANNEX The Joint Research Centre’s work programme for 2021-2022 I. Introduction As the European Commission’s science and knowledge service, the Joint Research Centre (JRC) supports Commission services by providing evidence for smarter policies. This annex to the Commission implementing decision presents the JRC’s work programme for 2021 and 2022. The 2021-2022 work programme: supports the Commission’s political priorities and high-level objectives, and the Commission’s 2021 work programme; contributes to the key strategic orientations of the Horizon Europe Strategic Plan for 2021-2024 as stated therein and implements the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe concerning the direct actions of the JRC; contributes to the general and specific objectives of the Euratom research and training programme 2021-2025, namely to undertake nuclear research and training activities focusing on the continuous improvement of nuclear safety, security and radiation protection, as well as to complement the achievement of Horizon Europe’s objectives inter alia in the context of the energy transition. takes account of the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and the steps the Commission has taken in its aftermath, including the EU recovery plan (COM(2020) 456 final); is funded either by institutional resources (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe in the Year 2030: “Digital Technology, Active Citizenship, and the Society of the Future” (Berlin, 4Th - 9Th January 2011)
    - Cultural Diplomacy in Europe - A Forum for Young Leaders - Europe in the Year 2030: “Digital Technology, Active Citizenship, and the Society of the Future” (Berlin, 4th - 9th January 2011) A program of lectures and workshops exploring: • The Political Composition of the European Union in 2030: New Members, Former Members? • The Role of Digital Technology in the Society of the Future • The Use of Soft Power and Cultural Diplomacy by National States and the European Union • Bridging the Gap Between EU Institutions and the General Public: Active Citizenship ***** Participants of the program will also take part in: "The Future of EU Foreign Policy: An International Conference on the Political, Economic and Cultural Dimensions of EU Foreign Policy" (Berlin, 4th - 6th January 2011/ www.icd-euforeignpolicy.org) Speakers for the Conference include: Ana Trisic Babic; Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Bosnia & Herzegovina Prof. Dr. Davorin Kračun; Former Minister for Economic Relations and Development of Slovenia, Former Foreign Minister, Former Deputy Prime Minister Dr. Emil Constantinescu; Former President of Romania Erna Hennicot Schoepges; Former Luxembourgian Minister of Culture and Religious Affairs Dr. Erhard Busek; Former Vice-Chancellor of Austria, Former Minister for Education & Cultural Affairs Gerassimos D. Arsenis; Former Minister of Economics of Greece, Former Minister of Education and Former Minister of Defence Dr. Jacques F. Poos; Former Deputy Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Minister of Foreign Affairs Jytte Hilden; Former Minister of Culture of Denmark Prof. Dr. Lufter Xhuveli; Former Albanian Minister of Environment Mirko Tomassoni; Former Captain Regent of San Marino Prof. Dr. Ulrich Brückner; Jean Monnet Professor for European Studies, Stanford University in Berlin Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL Brussels, 22 September 2020 Participants
    GENERAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL Brussels, 22 September 2020 Participants Belgium: Mr Koen GEENS Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Justice, with responsibility for the Buildings Agency, and Minister for European Affairs Bulgaria: Mr Petko DOYKOV Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs Czechia: Mr Tomáš PETŘÍČEK Minister for Foreign Affairs Denmark: Mr Jeppe KOFOD Minister for Foreign Affairs Germany: Mr Michael ROTH Minister of State for Europe, Federal Foreign Office Estonia: Mr Märt VOLMER Deputy Minister for EU Affairs Ireland Mr Thomas BYRNE Minister of State for European Affairs Greece: Mr Miltiadis VARVITSIOTIS Deputy Minister, with responsibility for European Affairs Spain: Mr Juan GONZÁLEZ-BARBA PERA State Secretary for the European Union France: Mr Clément BEAUNE Minister of State with responsibility for European Affairs, attached to the Minister for Europe and for Foreign Affairs Croatia: Ms Irena ANDRASSY Permanent Representative Italy: Mr Vincenzo AMENDOLA Minister for European Affairs Cyprus: Mr Nicholas EMILIOU Permanent Representative Latvia: Ms Sanita PAVĻUTA-DESLANDES Permanent Representative Lithuania: Mr Albinas ZANANAVIČIUS Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs Luxembourg: Mr Jean ASSELBORN Minister for Foreign and European Affairs, Minister for Immigration and Asylum Hungary: Ms Judit VARGA Minister for Justice Malta: Mr Stefan ZRINZO AZZOPARDI Parliamentary Secretary for European Funds within the Ministry for Foreign and European Affairs Netherlands: Mr Stef BLOK Minister for Foreign Affairs Austria: Mr Nikolaus MARSCHIK Permanent
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.12.2019 COM(2019)
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.12.2019 COM(2019) 638 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE WORKING OF COMMITTEES DURING 2018 {SWD(2019) 441 final} EN EN REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE WORKING OF COMMITTEES DURING 2018 In accordance with Article 10(2) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers1 (the ‘Comitology Regulation’), the Commission hereby presents the annual report on the working of committees for 2018. This report gives an overview of developments in the comitology system in 2018 and a summary of the committees’ activities. It is accompanied by a staff working document containing detailed statistics on the work of the individual committees. 1. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE COMITOLOGY SYSTEM IN 2018 1.1. General development As described in the 2013 annnual report2, all comitology procedures provided for in the ‘old’ Comitology Decision3, with the exception of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, were automatically adapted to the new comitology procedures provided for in the Comitology Regulation. In 2018, the comitology committees were therefore operating under the procedures set out in the Comitology Regulation, i.e. advisory (Article 4) and examination (Article 5), as well as under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny set out in Article 5a of the Comitology Decision. The Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 20164 recalls, in its point 27, the need to align the regulatory procedure with scrutiny: ‘The three institutions acknowledge the need for the alignment of all existing legislation to the legal framework introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, and in particular the need to give high priority to the prompt alignment of all basic acts which still refer to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dismissed! Victims of 2015-2018 Brutal Crackdowns in the Democratic Republic of Congo Denied Justice
    DISMISSED! VICTIMS OF 2015-2018 BRUTAL CRACKDOWNS IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO DENIED JUSTICE Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2020 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: “Dismissed!”. A drawing by Congolese artist © Justin Kasereka (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2020 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: AFR 62/2185/2020 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 2. METHODOLOGY 9 3. BACKGROUND: POLITICAL CRISIS 10 3.1 ATTEMPTS TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION 10 3.2 THE « GLISSEMENT »: THE LONG-DRAWN-OUT ELECTORAL PROCESS 11 3.3 ELECTIONS AT LAST 14 3.3.1 TIMELINE 15 4. VOICES OF DISSENT MUZZLED 19 4.1 ARBITRARY ARRESTS, DETENTIONS AND SYSTEMATIC BANS ON ASSEMBLIES 19 4.1.1 HARASSMENT AND ARBITRARY ARRESTS OF PRO-DEMOCRACY ACTIVISTS AND OPPONENTS 20 4.1.2 SYSTEMATIC AND UNLAWFUL BANS ON ASSEMBLY 21 4.2 RESTRICTIONS OF THE RIGHT TO SEEK AND RECEIVE INFORMATION 23 5.
    [Show full text]
  • European Commission
    COMMISSION EUROPEENNE Bruxelles, le 7 mars 2014 CALENDRIER du 10 au 16 mars 2014 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Déplacements et visites Lundi 10 mars Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council Eurogroup meeting European Parliament plenary session Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO attends the EU Innovation Conference Ms Catherine ASHTON travels to Teheran (Iran) Ms Neelie KROES opens Cyber Security Conference at CEBIT in Hannover (Germany) Mr Janez POTOČNIK delivers a speech "If environment and sustainability join social justice as the two key issues with economic success, what then are the key business government issues?" at the Ad Hoc Council annual meeting in Brussels (Belgium) Mr Andris PIEBALGS meets with Mr Abdou DIOUF, Secretary-General of La Francophonie in Paris (France) Mr Michel BARNIER receives Lord YOUNGER, UK Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Intellectual Property at the Department for Business Innovation and Skills Ms Androulla VASSILIOU visits Bucharest (10-11/03): visits together with Mr Georges SOROS and Romanian Minister of Education various Roma projects around Bucharest; opens the Conference on "Keeping Young People in Employment, Education and Training; meets with students of the Roma Education Fund (Romania) Mr Karel DE GUCHT visits Atlanta (USA) Ms Máire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN gives the award for the EU Prize for European Women Innovators 2014, at the 'Innovation Convention' in Brussels (Belgium) Ms Maria DAMANAKI in Athens: delivers keynote speech at the High Level Conference on Maritime and Coastal Tourism; attends informal tourism ministerial meeting (Greece) Mr Günther H. OETTINGER receives European Affairs Committee of the Bavarian Parliament, Brussels (Belgium) Mr Günther H.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Affairs Forum News January 2015
    SOCIAL AFFAIRS FORUM NEWS JANUARY 2015 SECRETARIAT UPDATES Our next Social Affairs Forum and study visit at CSV UK will take place on 9 and 10 March 2015 in London. Please register here: http://solidar.org/spip.php?page=agenda&date=2015-03- 09 The agenda will follow in due time. Advisory group on asylum, migration and integration SOLIDAR constituted a transversal advisory group on asylum, migration and integration coordinated by our Italian member ARCI with the support of the Secretariat. The political reason for creating such a taskforce is that - despite the fact that migration is currently a very relevant political, social and cultural matter - a common approach has not emerged. On the contrary, migration more and more became a divisive question between different political and cultural visions on the future. The aim of the advisory group is to work together on a common approach on the issues of asylum, migration and integration by providing a platform to better understand the challenges that civil society organisations are facing at local level as well as to share knowledge about practices that SOLIDAR members are carrying out. A brainstorming meeting will take place on 10 February from 10:00 to 13:00 at SOLIDAR Offices. The aim of the brainstorming is to make a first exchange with members on the priorities, objectives and expectations about the work of this advisory group in 2015. Please also note that the brainstorming meeting will be followed by the SOLIDAR-CGIL round table Rights-based approach to EU migration policies: the role of the Trade Union Network on Mediterranean and Sub-Saharan Migrants that will take place on 10 February from 15:00 to 17:30.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej
    CENTRUM BADANIA OPINII SPOŁECZNEJ SEKRETARIAT 629 - 35 - 69, 628 - 37 - 04 UL. ŻURAWIA 4A, SKR. PT.24 OŚRODEK INFORMACJI 693 - 46 - 92, 625 - 76 - 23 00 - 503 W A R S Z A W A TELEFAX 629 - 40 - 89 INTERNET http://www.cbos.pl E-mail: [email protected] BS/185/2004 ZAUFANIE DO POLITYKÓW W LISTOPADZIE KOMUNIKAT Z BADAŃ WARSZAWA, LISTOPAD 2004 PRZEDRUK MATERIAŁÓW CBOS W CAŁOŚCI LUB W CZĘŚCI ORAZ WYKORZYSTANIE DANYCH EMPIRYCZNYCH JEST DOZWOLONE WYŁĄCZNIE Z PODANIEM ŹRÓDŁA ZAUFANIE DO POLITYKÓW W LISTOPADZIE ¾ Pierwsze miejsce wśród polityków najbardziej powszechnie darzonych zaufaniem zajmują w tym miesiącu ex aequo Aleksander Kwaśniewski oraz Zbigniew Religa (po 63% deklaracji). Na kolejnych pozycjach tego rankingu - ze znacznie słabszymi już notowaniami - znaleźli się: Lech Kaczyński (48%), Jan Rokita (47%) oraz Jarosław Kaczyński (45%). Zaufaniem około dwóch piątych pytanych cieszą się: Donald Tusk (42%), Marek Borowski (41%), Danuta Hübner, Zbigniew Ziobro (po 40% deklaracji) oraz Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz (38%). ¾ Spośród polityków uwzględnionych w listopadowym sondażu największą nieufność badanych budzi Leszek Miller (67% deklaracji). Znacznie mniej osób, aczkolwiek również bardzo dużo (50%), deklaruje nieufność do Andrzeja Leppera. Do ścisłej czołówki polityków najczęściej budzących nieufność badanych niezmiennie należą także Leszek Balcerowicz (44%) i wicepremier Jerzy Hausner (43%). Blisko dwie piąte respondentów (38%) nie ma zaufania do premiera Marka Belki. ¾ Listopad przyniósł głównie niekorzystne zmiany w dotychczaso- wych notowaniach polityków. Stosunkowo najbardziej pogorszyły się oceny Józefa Oleksego (spadek zaufania o 8 punktów i wzrost nieufności o 6 punktów procentowych), a nieco mniej - Jerzego Hausnera (spadek zaufania o 6 punktów i wzrost nieufności o 5 punktów procentowych). Pogorszyły się również notowania Zbigniewa Ziobry (spadek zaufania o 6 punktów i wzrost nieufności o 3 punkty) oraz Marka Balickiego (spadek zaufania o 5 punktów i wzrost nieufności o 3 punkty).
    [Show full text]