DOCSLIB.ORG

Report- Hq956)49 . L909 - 08-01

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The electronic version of this file/report should have the file name: Type of document.Spill Number.Year-Month.File Year-Year or Report name.pdf letter. .File spillfile .pdf report- hQ956)49 . l909 - 08-01. F,#166 31 .pdf i RIV EST)6817 0 fO Project Site numbers will be proceeded by the following: Municipal Brownfields - b Superfund - hw Spills - sp ERP-e VCP-v BCP-c non-releasable - put .nf.pdf Example: letter.sp9875693.1998-01.Filespillfile.nf.pdf 1 .'- i 4150461 ND-2900 01748 1 ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS AT INACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES PHASE I INVESTIGATION 1 SNYDER TANKC6MP., SITE NUMBER: 915049 TOWN OF HAMBURG, ERIE COUNTY August 1989 tel <1 1 Prepared for: New York State Department of Environnpental Conservation 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233 1 Thomas C. Jorling, Commissioner 1 Division of Hazardouq Waste Remediation Michael J. O'Toole, Jr., P.E., Director 1 Prepared by: Ecology and Environment Engineering, P.C. NO·2900 01748 ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS AT INACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES PHASE I INVESTIGATION SNYDER TANK CORP., SITE NUMBER: 915049 TOWN OF HAMBURG, ERIE COUNTY August 1989 1 ROFESSIONAL 1 1 Prepared for: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233 Thomas C. Jorling, Commissioner Division of Hazardous Waste Remediation Michael J. O'Toole, Jr., P.E., Director Prepared by: 1h ecology and environment Ei engineering, p.c. BUFFALO368 PLEASANTVIEW CORPORATE DRIVE, LANCASTER,CENTER NEW YORK 14086, TEL. 716/684-8060 recycled paper 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Section P age 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .. 1-1 1.1 SITE BACKGROUND ............. 1-1 1.2 PHASE I EFFORTS ............ 1-1 1 1.3 ASSESSMENT 1-4 1.4 HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM SCORE 1-5 2 PURPOSE 2-1 3 SCOPE OF WORK 3-1 4 SITE ASSESSMENT .. 4-1 4.1 SITE HISTORY 4-1 4.2 SITE TOPOGRAPHY .............. ........... 4-2 4.2.1 Soils 4-3 4.2.2 Wetlands 4-3 4.2.3 Surface Waters .......... .... 4-4 1 4.2.4 Land Use ......................... 4-4 4.3 SITE HYDROLOGY 4-5 4.3.1 Regional Geology and Hydrology 4-5 4.3.2 Site Hydrogeology 4-8 4.3.3 Hydraulic Connections ............ 4-9 4.4 SITE CONTAMINATION ................... 4-9 1 5 PRELIMINARY APPLICATION OF THE HRS 5-1 5.1 NARRATIVE SUMMARY ........... 5-1 1 iii recycled paper eci,logy Bnd envininmem 11 J Table of Contents (Cont.) 1 1 Section Paae 5.2 LOCATION ....................../ 5-2 5.3 .. 5-3 HRS SCORE SHEET ®............/o... ....... 5.4 DOCUMENTATION RECORDS HRS ..... 5-10 5.5 POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE INSPECTION REPORT ................. 5- 6 ASSESSMENT OF DATA ADEQUACY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 6-1 1 7 REFERENCES ...- 7-1 ..........o..../....o Appendix A PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD o........... ................. A-1 8 UPDATED NYSDEC INACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL REGISTRY FORM 8-1 ........................o•/•............ C PHOTOCOPIED REFERENCES C-1 1 i V 1 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1 1-1 Location Map .... 1-2 1-2 Site Map ................................ 1-3 4-1 Bedrock Units of the Erie-Niagara Basin 4-6 5-1 Location Map ...... 5-3 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 3-1 Sources Contacted for the NYSDEC Phase I Investigation at the Snyder Tank Corporation Site ................... 3-2 1 1 1 V recycled paper ercili,gy find environment 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 SITE BACKGROUND The Snyder Tank Corporation site has been used by Snyder Tank for the past disposal of automobile fuel tank manufacturing process wastes. The property occupies approximately 10 acres located on Lake Shore and Hoover roads, on the eastern shore of Lake Erie in the Town of Hamburg, Erie County, New York (see Figure 1-1). The site consists 1 of an office, production buildings, gravel parking and loading areas, and a 100-foot-wide beach area. The disposal areas of concern at.the site include the gravel parking and loading areas and the westerly adj acent beach. The plant property grades gently toward the west and the beach, and serves as a route for surficial and storm-drain runoff. The beach serves as the discharge location for the plant's permitted State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPOES), which drains directly into Lake Erie (see Figure 1-2). Aside from this discharge, all other wastes are reportedly put into containers and disposed of off site. 1.2 PHASE I EFFORTS On July 29, 1987, Ecology and Environment, Inc. (E & E) conducted a site inspection in support of this investigation. Prior to the inspection, available federal, state, county, and municipal files were reviewed. The site inspection consisted of a visual survey of the property that included: 1-1 recycled paper recilogy iand envirtinmelit 781'10" 2.1 ilylli D R SF Woodlawn Bi Sch <1171--11111111/- 11 11 11 11 MiLLER Sewage osar 0 14 1 j . SNYDER L_/ 8 Dis¢ TANK CO. SITE 1 : /X , J 71 0 urt f 630 595 6 1, ii il[ ; heater . -61 AthGI'Springs,s«.: e ROAU'\ 0 o Radio Towers '680 (WK#W) e 0 rontier - 5.. 700: OWA 0 ///100 SOURCE: U.S.G.S. 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic) Quadrangle, Buffalo SEE. N.Y.. 1965. SCALE 0 1 MILE 0 1 KILOMETER Figure 1-1 LOCATION MAP 1-2 1 - 1 . 1 1 DRAINAGE r ts:: '-i': :' ':. CHANNELS MAIN DRAIN 1 (DISCHARGE PIPE) \\\c I.- I 0 \ 'R WINDMILL 1 ".' - Hle H GRAVEL\ :: AREArn AND GATE ]COBBLES SEWER b- LINE POND DRAIN \0 e/It 1 PIPE e GATE OFFICE DEAD VEG. 11>56* 1, 1 -P-4 60 . ·r St SCRAP 0060 #'+Z> 4 MANUF.00000000 PLANT TANKS 0 SCRAP % No. 2 982 1 METAL %:00000 00 06- PRODUCT STORAGE AREA BLDG. FO,3 RED G#Ble /tfj DEPOSITS 1 r400 PLANT NO. 1 1 SEWER LINE '0 --- -- OIL SEWER DRAINAGE AREA STAIN 1 LINE ABANDONED 1 GAS STATION 1 SOURCE Ecology and Environment, Inc , 1987 NOT TO SCALE Figure 1-2 SITE MAP - SNYDER TAN K 1 recycled paper 1-3 cr4,! nml enumnmelit o Overall site conditions; 1 o Description of vegetation and a survey for stressed vegeta- tion; o Presence of structures on the site; o Distance to nearest residence; o Location of nearest agricultural land; o Location of nearest surface water and wells, and type of use; 0 -Visual delineation of waste dis0osal areas; o Air quality survey using an HNu photoionizer; and o Photodocumentation of the site. All observations were.recorded in a field logbook and reported in the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Site Inspection Report form. 1 1.3 ASSESSMENT 1 The walk=over inspection of the site and adjacent areas revealed that maintenance practices at the site have improved relative to past reports. No leaking tanks, improperly drummed waste, or staininq of the beach were observed. No readings above background were noted on the photoionization detector while on site. The site inspection team identified some points of concern, including stressed vegetation on the .northwest side of Plant No. 2, between the building and the fence. Additionally, the gravelled lot on the southwest side of Plant No. 2 'is presently beina used for 1 outdoor storage of various scrap metals, racks, and tanks. Other concerns noted included a 7-foot x 3-foot oily stain adjacent to the south side of Plant No. 1, and the presence of rust-colored sediments between the eastern wall of Plant No. 1 and Route 5 (New Lake Shore 1 1-4 1 Road). An above-ground sulfuric acid storage tank (approximately 1,000-gallon), which is apoarently no longer in use, was also observed east of Plant No. 1. This tank is visible from Route 5. Three effluent discharges were observed at the property beach. 1 The northernmost discharge is the site-permitted SPDES location. This conduit transports spent manufacturing cooling water with Route 5 and Hoover Road storm sewer drainage to the beach area. The other two drainage pipes are considerably smaller and are thought to be used for surficial drainage of gravelled areas to the southwest of Plants Nos. 1 and 2. 1.4 HRS SCORE A preliminary application of the Hazard Ranking System (HRS) has 1 been made to quantify the risk associated with this site. As the Phase I investigation is limited in scope, not all the information . needed to fully evaluate the site is available. An HRS score was com- pleted on the ba5is of the available data. Absence of necessary data may result in an unrealistically low HRS score. Under the HRS, three numerical scores are computed to express the site's relative risk or damage to the population and the environment. The three scores are: 1 o SM reflects the potential for harm to humans or the environ- ment from migration of a hazardous substance away from the facility by routes involving groundwater, surface water, or air. It is a composite of separate scores for each of the three routes (SGW = groundwater route score, SSW = surface water route score, and SA = air route score). o SFE reflects th@ potential for harm from substances that can explode or cause fires. 1 o SDC reflects the potential for harm from direct contact with hazardous substances at the facility (i.e., no migration need be involved). 1 1-5 recycled paper croli,gy and envircinment The preliminary score was: 1 SM 14.73 (SGW = 23.59; Ssw = 9.65; SA = 0) SFE Not scored SDC 37.50 1 1 'flb 1 1 1-6 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2.
Recommended publications
  • Building in Dutchess: Reading the Landscape

    Building in Dutchess: Reading the Landscape

    Cover Photo: Old photograph of bleachery in the village of Wappingers Falls Building in Dutchess: Reading the Landscape PUBLISHED BY THE DUTCHESS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Poughkeepsie, New York Joyce C. Ghee, Historian All maps are from the collection of the Dutchess County Historical Society and appear in this publication with the society's kind permission. The originals are available for research purposes. Call the society for further details at 914-471 -1630. Publication made possible in part by a grant from the New York State Council on the Arts. First Edition, Copyright 1989, Dutchess County Department of History, Lucille P. Pattison, County Executive, Harry B. Schroeder, Chairman of the Legislature. All Rights Reserved. Credits Conference Materials Editor: David J. Greenwood Cover Design: Sherley LaDue Layout: Brian Schill and Sherley LaDue Exhibit/Catalog Design: Brian Schill Project Director: Joyce C. Ghee Principle Photography: Claudia Archimede, Alexander Casler, Dutchess County Landmarks Association Collection Archival Maps: Dutchess County Historical Society Collection Original Drawings: David J. Greenwood Tab le of Contents Part I Introduction: Joyce Ghee ..................................... ................... 5 "Building in Dutchess: Transforming the Landscape" Photo Essay : Exhibit Catalog .................. ......................... ...... 7 Part II Conference Papers ............................................................... 25 Where to Begin: David J. Greenwood .................................. 27 Building
  • Early Birding Book

    Early Birding Book

    Early Birding in Dutchess County 1870 - 1950 Before Binoculars to Field Guides by Stan DeOrsey Published on behalf of The Ralph T. Waterman Bird Club, Inc. Poughkeepsie, New York 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Stan DeOrsey All rights reserved First printing July 2016 Digital version June 2018, with minor changes and new pages added at the end. Digital version July 2019, pages added at end. Cover images: Front: - Frank Chapman’s Birds of Eastern North America (1912 ed.) - LS Horton’s post card of his Long-eared Owl photograph (1906). - Rhinebeck Bird Club’s second Year Book with Crosby’s “Birds and Seasons” articles (1916). - Chester Reed’s Bird Guide, Land Birds East of the Rockies (1908 ed.) - 3x binoculars c.1910. Back: 1880 - first bird list for Dutchess County by Winfrid Stearns. 1891 - The Oölogist’s Journal published in Poughkeepsie by Fred Stack. 1900 - specimen tag for Canada Warbler from CC Young collection at Vassar College. 1915 - membership application for Rhinebeck Bird Club. 1921 - Maunsell Crosby’s county bird list from Rhinebeck Bird Club’s last Year Book. 1939 - specimen tag from Vassar Brothers Institute Museum. 1943 - May Census checklist, reading: Raymond Guernsey, Frank L. Gardner, Jr., Ruth Turner & AF [Allen Frost] (James Gardner); May 16, 1943, 3:30am - 9:30pm; Overcast & Cold all day; Thompson Pond, Cruger Island, Mt. Rutson, Vandenburg’s Cove, Poughkeepsie, Lake Walton, Noxon [in LaGrange], Sylvan Lake, Crouse’s Store [in Union Vale], Chestnut Ridge, Brickyard Swamp, Manchester, & Home via Red Oaks Mill. They counted 117 species, James Gardner, Frank’s brother, added 3 more.
  • Community Preservation Plan UPDATE Town of Red Hook Villages of Red Hook & Tivoli

    Community Preservation Plan UPDATE Town of Red Hook Villages of Red Hook & Tivoli

    Community Preservation Plan UPDATE Town of Red Hook Villages of Red Hook & Tivoli Red Hook Town Board | Red Hook, NY Adopted June 9, 2016 Acknowledgements This 2016 Community Preservation Plan Update was prepared by the Town Board of the Town of Red Hook, based upon the advice and recommendations of the Red Hook Community Preservation Fund Advisory Board. The Advisory Board included a cross section of community leaders from the Town and its two Villages, Red Hook and Tivoli. The Plan is based upon the original 2011 planning process that led to creation of the first Community Preservation Plan and Community Preservation Fund. The Fund was authorized by New York State Law and revenues collected and deposited into the Fund may only be expended based upon the Plan. The State Law that authorized the Fund requires that the Plan be updated not less than once each five years. The Advisory Board received assistance from Robert Wills, Senior GIS Project Coordinator for the Dutchess County Department of Planning and Development. Mr. Wills integrated data on thousands of parcels in the Town and skillfully created the Community Preservation Plan Update maps. Laura Heady, Conservation and Land Use Coordinator for the Hudson River Estuary Program of the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and Cornell University. Susan Ezrati and Mary Ann Johnson, Advisory Board members, collated reams of data on Town parcels, potentially eligible for use of the Fund. Town Board of the Town of Red Hook Robert McKeon, Supervisor Harry Colgan Sarah Imboden William O’Neil Jim Ross Community Preservation Fund Advisory Board Susan Ezrati, Chair Richard Biezynski John Hardeman Pete Hubbell Mary Ann Johnson Brent Kovalchik Ken Migliorelli Technical Assistance Provided by Town Planner, J.
  • SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol. 67 No. 9

    SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol. 67 No. 9

    OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE LAKE ERIE REGION, AACA The Chautauqua Belle SEPTEMBER 2019 Vol. 67 No. 9 FEATURES: President’s message Activities message with dates of events Info on the September & October runs Info on the first indoor meet in November Photos from the Chautauqua Belle ride Cruise nights for September The Sidelight Volume 67, Issue 9 http://local.aaca.org/lakeerie/ September 2019 LER BOARD MEMBERS & CHAIRMEN FOR 2019 LER EVENTS FOR 2019 18-20 President .......………………............ Tim Cryan c228-5638 Sept. 8 – Tour of Grand Island hosted by w645-4159 Dennis & Del Upton 18-20 Vice President ................................ Cliff Schulz 634-7667 Oct. 20 - Medina Railroad tour hosted by 18-20 Treasurer ...............................…...... John Haid 674-7351 Don & Joyce Butlak, co-hosted by Lon (Office) 674-7239 & Valerie Wilson 18-19 Recording Secretary.............…...... Linda Foster 652-5001 Nov. 10 - Cliff Schulz will host “Desserts- 19-21 Activities Co-Chairmen……... Lynelle Schloerb 949-2489 R-Us” night. 2019 Activities Co-Chairmen ………. Chuck Weimer h688-5016 C955-0834 *This is a tentative schedule. The dates are subject to 2019 Activities Awards Chairman …... Valerie Wilson 873-6280 change, so check this list monthly for more 18-20 Membership Chairman.................... Lon Wilson 873-6280 information and possible changes. All material and want ads must be submitted to the 19-21 Sunshine Chairman ......................... Sue Yearke 433-3673 editor by the 20thof the previous month that material 17-19 Split Club ………………...…… Dennis Powers 694-5517 is to appear. 19-21 Publicity Chairman ………………. Mike Mesi 810-2610 Permission is hereby granted to other club 19-21 Legislative Chairman …………….
  • Document Resume Ed 130

    Document Resume Ed 130

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 130 129 08 CB 008 684 AUTHOR Robison, Kathleen TITLE Survey of Public Demand/Need for Postsecondary Continuing Education for Adults (Lifelong Learning Programs) in Western New York. Final Report. INSTITUTION New York State Education Dept., Albany. SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Aug 76 NOTE 162p.; Best copy available EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$8.69 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Characteristics; *Adult Education; *Adults; *Continuous Learning; *Educational Interest; *Educational Needs; Regional Planning; *Socioeconomic Influences; Surveys IDENTIFIERS New York ABSTRACT This report contains a survey assessing the needs of adults (in Western New York) for learning activities with the purpose of improving their educational opportunities. The report is divided into five units: (1) Introduction to the Project; (2) Regional Characteristics; (3) Research Methods; (4)Results of the Survey, which include such aspects as who is interested in participating in education, barriers to educational participation, reasons for participating in adult learning activities, topic preferences of adults, preferred learning conditions, financing adult learning programs, career retraining, and adult advisement; and (5) five appendixes, which give a description of the Survey Research Center, a definition of the ENAS (Erie Niagara Area Survey) substrata, sampling fraction and weighing formulas, a sample respondent selection key, and the needs survey questionnaire. A summary of recommendations is also included. (WL) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort * * to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS).
  • 2020 Directory Federal/State, County, City, Town & Village Officials

    2020 Directory Federal/State, County, City, Town & Village Officials

    3. CATTARAUGUS COUNTY STATE OF NEW YORK 2020 Directory Federal/State, County, City, Town & Village Officials An updated directory can be found on our website at www.cattco.org Issued by Cattaraugus County Board of Elections April 1, 2020 TABLE of CONTENTS Federal Elected Officials ......................................................... 1 State Elected Officials ............................................................... 2 County Legislature ..................................................................... 3 County Map .................................................................................. 4 County Administration .......................................................... 11 County Officials ....................................................................... 11 Judicial Officials .......................................................................16 City Officials ...............................................................................17 Town Officials........................................................................... 22 Village Officials .........................................................................90 Zip Codes ................................................................................... 105 FEDERAL ELECTED OFFICIALS President -Donald J. Trump The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Washington, DC 20500 www.whitehouse.gov Phone: (202) 456-1414, Fax.: (202) 456-2461 U.S. Senate Charles E. Schumer Buffalo: 130 S. Elmwood Avenue. Rm. 600, Buffalo, NY 14202 Phone: (716)846-4111,
  • Dutchess County Historical Society Yearbook Subject Index 1914-2019 / Volumes 1-98

    Dutchess County Historical Society Yearbook Subject Index 1914-2019 / Volumes 1-98

    Dutchess County Historical Society Yearbook Subject Index 1914-2019 / Volumes 1-98 Subject Headings Agriculture………………………….1-3 Hudson River………………………..45-46 Architecture……………………..….3 Land Patents & Early Settlements...46-48 Associations…………………………3-7 Maps…………………………………48-49 Bible Records and Genealogy……...7-12 Mills (see Bridges and Mills) Biography………………………......12-28 Miscellaneous………………………..49-56 Bridges and Mills…………………..28-29 Museums…………………………….56 Businesses…………………………..29-31 Names, Geographical……………….57 Cemeteries………………………….31-32 Native Americans (see Ethnic Groups) Civil Administration…………….....32-33 Persons of Color (see Ethnic Groups) Civil War…………………………....33-34 Politics……………………………….57-58 Country Seats, Homesteads, and Poughkeepsie………………………..58-61 Other Houses……………….34-37 Religion……………………………...61-63 Cultural Life………………………..37-39 Revolutionary Era DCHS Membership Lists……….....39 (see also Biography)…………64-66 Early Settlements (see Land Patents) Sports………………………………...66-67 Education………………………...…40-41 Towns………………………………...67-70 Ethnic Groups…………………...…41-44 Transportation………………………70-71 Health…………………………...…..44-45 Veterans…...………………………....71-72 Agriculture Title Year Vol. Pages The Story of Hyde Park, Its Connection with the Medical Profession and the Science of Horticulture [photo] 1928 13 26-29 The Dutchess County Agricultural Society (formed in 1806) 1928 13 54-63 The Stone Barn at Pleasant Valley [photo] 1931 16 19-20 Farm-Life in the Hudson Valley, 1769-1779 1933 18 41-53 Henry Winthrop Sargent and the Early History of Landscape Gardening and Ornamental Horticulture in Dutchess County, New York 1937 22 36-70 Appendix I: A Dutchess County Gardener’s Diary 1829-1866 1937 22 63-66 Appendix II: Early Dutchess County Nurseries 1937 22 66-68 Appendix III: Authorities (additional reference books) 1937 22 68-70 Two New Books about Dutchess County (review of a book on plant life) 1938 23 23 Title Year Vol.
  • Community Preservation Project Plan Adopted May 26, 2011 TOWN of RED HOOK Adopted Community Preservation Project Plan

    Community Preservation Project Plan Adopted May 26, 2011 TOWN of RED HOOK Adopted Community Preservation Project Plan

    TOWN OF RED HOOK DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK Community Preservation Project Plan Adopted May 26, 2011 TOWN OF RED HOOK Adopted Community Preservation Project Plan Prepared by: Town Board of the Town of Red Hook Sue Crane, Supervisor Harry Colgan William O’Neill Jim Ross Micki Strawinski With Technical Assistance from: Community Preservation Fund Advisory Board Richard Biezynski Susan Ezrati Pete Hubbell Brent Kovalchik Robin Logan Philip Seymour Former Advisory Board Members: Victor Behoriam Geoffrey Carter Miriam Latzer and GREENPLAN Inc. Rhinebeck, New York May 26, 2011 Table of Contents Part 1: Introduction, Purpose and Summary ...........................................................................................1.1 Part 2: Target Areas, Projects, Parcels and Priorities .................................................................................2.1 Part 3: Summary and Evaluation of Land Use Alternatives .....................................................................3.1 Appendix A: Complete Parcel Identification and Prioritization A.1: Parcel Spreadsheet Detailed Ranking A.2: Parcel Spreadsheet Detailed Re-Ranking by Contiguous Protected Properties A.3: Parcel Spreadsheet Detailed Ranking for Tivoli A.4: Parcel Spreadsheet Detailed Ranking for Red Hook Village Appendix B: Stewardship and Monitoring Report Appendix C: Parcel Selection Worksheets (see separately bound Appendix C on file in the Town Clerk’s Office) ii Town of Red Hook Community Preservation Project Plan PART 1. INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE AND SUMMARY A. INTRODUCTION Red Hook is a diverse town situated in Northern Dutchess County. It is 38.9 square miles1 in land area and had an estimated population of 11,597 in 20092. It includes the villages of Red Hook and Tivoli as well as the hamlets of Upper Red Hook, Annandale, and Barrytown. The Town has a distinctly rural character with rolling hills and farmland dotted with barns and historic farmhouses.
  • January/February 2015

    January/February 2015

    Penn Dixie Chronicle A newsletter of the Penn Dixie Paleontological Outdoor Education Center Hamburg Natural History Society Founded to Protect and Promote Education January/February 2015 about our Natural Resources Volume 23, No.1 JANUARY PROGRAMS Cassini’s Tour of Saturn, Dawn’s Approach to Ceres, and New Horizon’s Long Trek to Pluto Penn Dixie welcomes Dr. Kevin Williams to speak on “Cassini’s Tour of Saturn, Dawn’s Approach to Ceres, and New Horizon’s Long Trek to Pluto” on Wednesday, January 28, 2015, at 7 PM in the auditorium of the Gateway Executive Office at 3556 Lake Shore Road, Blasdell, NY 14219. Since arriving at Saturn in 2004, the Cassini spacecraft has returned a wealth of information about the planet, its rings, and its moons. By orbiting Saturn for over a decade now, Cassini has provided images and other data that allow us to un- derstand the Saturnian system as never before, and many of the images are not only scientifically interesting but beautiful as well. As Cassini’s mission continues, the Dawn spacecraft nears Ceres, going into orbit in April, and the New Horizons spacecraft approaches Pluto for its closest approach in July. This presentation will cover some of the results and expecta- tions from these three amazing missions. Dr. Williams is an Associate Professor of Earth Sciences at SUNY Buffalo State where his teaching focuses on gen- eral geology and surface processes on Earth and other planets. His research involves projects on Mars geologic mapping and using ground-penetrating radar to study the shallow subsurface on Earth.

  • Chapter 1—Purpose of and Need for Action

    Fisher Reintroduction Plan / Environmental Assessment Fisher Reintroduction Plan / Environmental Olympic National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Olympic National Park Washington Olympic National Park Fisher Reintroduction Plan / Environmental Assessment Fisher Kits on a Log. Photo by C. Raley, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station September 2007 September 2007 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Olympic National Park Washington Olympic National Park Fisher Reintroduction Plan / Environmental Assessment September 2007 SUMMARY BACKGROUND Olympic National Park encompasses approximately 922,651 acres on the Olympic Peninsula in the northwest corner of Washington State. The Park, of which approximately 95% is designated wilderness, is surrounded by a complex network of lands managed by federal and state agencies, American Indian tribes, and private landowners. At least 16 animal and 8 plant species that occur on the peninsula do not occur anywhere else in the world (NPS n.d.a, 1996b). Two species have been lost from the ecosystem supported at Olympic National Park, including the fisher (Martes pennanti). Fishers are medium-sized carnivores with the body build of a stocky weasel. The fisher was listed by the state of Washington as an endangered species in 1998 and as a candidate for listing under the Endangered Species Act in 2004. Although the fisher is no longer found in the Park, it does exist in other regions of the United States and Canada. Fishers histori- cally occurred throughout much of the low- to mid-elevation for- ested areas of Washington, including Olympic National Park. Two major factors contributed to the decline of fishers in Wash- ington — over-exploitation from commercial trapping; and loss, degradation, and fragmentation of suitable habitat.
  • Full Environmental Assessment Form

    Full Environmental Assessment Form

    617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination @gcess has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. :§5 r-r --m­ Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: o-­ -.:;: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic proJ;B: data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It prmtides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-larglt1Tnpact; The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. W 0"\ Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important.
  • ORDER DIRECTING OVERLAY of the 315 AREA CODE REGION (Issued and Effective July 17, 2015)

    ORDER DIRECTING OVERLAY of the 315 AREA CODE REGION (Issued and Effective July 17, 2015)

    STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION At a session of the Public Service Commission held in the City of New York on July 16, 2015 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Audrey Zibelman, Chair Patricia L. Acampora Gregg C. Sayre Diane X. Burman, concurring CASE 07-C-1486 – Proceeding on Motion of the Commission, Pursuant to Section 97(2) of the Public Service Law, to Institute a Proceeding to Investigate and Evaluate Options for Making Additional Central Office Codes Available in the 315 Area Code Region. ORDER DIRECTING OVERLAY OF THE 315 AREA CODE REGION (Issued and Effective July 17, 2015) BY THE COMMISSION: INTRODUCTION In this Order, we conclude a proceeding to examine the alternative forms of relief available to address a projected shortage or exhaustion of the numbering resources in the 315 area code. The 315 area code is located within all or part of 18 counties in north central New York.1 Much of the population lives in Syracuse and its suburbs, while other major population centers include Utica and Watertown. If numbering resources, now constrained, were to become unavailable, economic activity and the general welfare of those who live in the area would be compromised. Through this Order, we take action to assure that the forecasted shortage in numbering resources, and the hardship which such a shortage would impose, will not occur. 1 The counties are: Cayuga, Chenango, Cortland, Fulton, Hamilton, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Ontario, Oswego, Otsego, Saint Lawrence, Seneca, Wayne, and Yates. CASE 07-C-1486 In accordance with the authority delegated to this Commission by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC),2 we conclude on the record before us that additional numbering resources to support the continued and ready availability of telephone numbers in the area currently served by the 315 area code should be provided through an "overlay" code and direct public education efforts regarding area code changes as discussed in detail herein.