The Matter, It Had Been Found That No Member of the Council Had Any
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
220 Chapter VIII. Maiatenmce of international peace and sccwlty the matter, it had been found that no member of the 41 Ibid,, paras. 38-45. Council had any objection to the Commission’s ” St I5 138, OR, 37th yr., Suppl. for April-June 1982. request, and that the Chairman of the Commission u St 15359, ibid.. Suppl. for July-Sept. 1982. had been informed that the Council agreed to an ” SII 5473. ibid.. Suppl. for Oct.-Dec. 1982. extension of two weeks until the middle of November )6 s/I 5492 and Corr. I and 2. replaced by SJ I5492IRev. I, ibid., 1982. Special Supplement No. 3. On I 7 November 1982, the Commission submitted ” S/I 5845, ibid.. 38th yr.. Suppl. for April-June 1983. its supplementary report to the Council,46 pursuant Ia SII 5860. rbrd., Resolutions and Decisions o/ Ihe Security to paragraph I2 of resolution 507 (1982). Council. 1983. In a letter dated 24 June 1983”’ addressed to the President of the Council, the Permanent Representa- tive of Seychelles to the United Nations requested 9. LEITER DATED I9 MARCH 19%2 FROM THE PERMA- that the Council: (a) terminate the work of the NENT REPRESENTATIVE OF NICARAGUA TO THE Commission; (b) keep the Special Fund operational; UNITED NATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE SECRETARY- and (c) in keeping with past practice, maintain the GENERAL item of Seychelles on the Council’s agenda. In a note dated 8 July 1983,4R the President of the IbilTl~L PROCEEDINGS Council stated that the members of the Council had taken note of the letter and had agreed, in consulta- Decision of 2 April 1982 (2347th meeting): rejection tions held on that day, that the Commission had of a draft resolution submitted by Guyana and fulfilled its mandate. Panama In a letter dated I9 March 1982,’ the representa- tive of Nicaragua transmitted the text of a note dated 18 March from the Co-ordinator of the Governing N OTES Junta of National Reconstruction of Nicaragua., who ISt14783, OR, 36th yr.. Suppl. for Oct.-Dec. 1981. requested an ur ent meeting of the Council in view of *For details, see chap. III of the present Supplement. what he descri % ed as the worsening of tension in I S/14769 and Corr.1, letter dated 26 November 198 I from the Central America and the increasing danger of a large- representative of Seychelles. and S/14777, letter dated I December scale military intervention by the armed forces of the 1981 from the same, OR, 36th yr.. Suppl. for Ocl.-Dec. 1981. United States. 4 S/14793, adopted without change as resolution 496 (1981). In a letter dated 25 March 1982,* the representa- ‘2314th mtg., paras. 8-18. tive of El Salvador, referring to the letter of 19 March 6 Ihrd., paras. 20-32. from the representative of Nicaragua, cited Chapter ‘For the vote, see 2314th mtg.. para. 33. VI11 of the Charter, recalled existing international B 2314th mrg., paras. 46-54. instruments with respect to inter-American matters Pfhid., statements by China, France, the German Democratic Republic, Ireland. Japan, Mexico, Niger, Spain, Tunisia and the and maintained that the problems of international United Kingdom. relations and disputes in the Latin American region lo Ibid., paras. 81-85. in general and Central America in particular should I1 Ibid., paras. 119-126. be solved through recourse in the first instance to 11S/14816, OR, 36rh yr,, Suppl. lor Oct.-Dec. 1981. appropriate procedures within the inter-American ‘JS/14850. ibid., 37th yr.. Suppl. for Jan.-March 1982. system.3 I4 SII 4905tRev. I I Ibrd., Special Supplement No. 2. At the 2335th meeting, on 25 March 1982, the “2359th mtg.. paras. 10-39. Council included the letter dated 19 March 1982 lb Ibid.. paras. 42-52. from the representative of Nicaragua in its agenda. I’ Ibid.. paras. 55-64. Following the adoption of the agenda, the Council In Ibid.. paras. 67-74. invited the following, at their request, to participate, Iv Ibid., paras. 78-94. without vote, in the discussion on the item: at the 10 /bid., paras. 96- IO I. same meeting, the representatives of Angola, Argenti- zI Ibid.. paras. 194-207. na, Cuba, Honduras, Mexico and Nicaragua; at the I* 236lst mtg., paras. 4-14. 2337th meeting, the representative of Viet Nam; at II Ibid., paras. 17-27. the 2339th meeting, the representatives of Grenada, I4 Ibid.. paras. 50-57. India, Iran, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Is Ibid., paras. 62-83. Mozambique, Nigeria, Seychelles and Yu oslavia; at *bIbid., paras. 101-l IO. the 2341st meeting, the representatives o7 Benin, El *‘23651h mtg.. paras. 27-40. Salvador, the German Democratic Republic, Mada- 2t ibid., paras. 42-56. gascar, Sri Lanka, the United Republic of Tanzania 2p Ibid.. paras. 59-7 I. and Zambia; at the 2342nd meeting, the representa- MObid., paras. 91-101. tives of Chile, Colombia, the Lib an Arab Jamahiri- II Ibid.. paras. 104-I 13. a, Mauritius, the Syrian Arab t; epublic and Zim- I* Ibid.. paras. 190-206. i abwe; at the 2343rd meeting, the representatives of I) General Assembly resolution 2625 (XXV). Algeria, the Congo and Costa Rica; and, at the ‘4 2367th mtg.. paras. 14-29. 2347th meeting, the representative of Ira .’ The I) Ibrd., paras. 120-I 33. Council considered the item at its 2335th to 9 337th, )6 Ibid.. paras. I 36- I4 1. 2339th, 2341st to 2343rd and 2347th meetings, from ” Ibid., paras. 165-l 70. 25 March to 2 April 1982. J( S/I 5 127, adopted without change as resolution 507 (1982). At the 2335th meeting, the Co-ordinator of the jP23701h mtg., paras. 16-25. Governing Junta of National Reconstrucfion of u1 For the vote, we ibid.. para. 26. Nicaragua presented an extensive and deta+d ac- (I 2370th mtg., paras. 28-36. count of Nicaragua’s troubled relatlonshlp with the Pul II 221 - United States and warned that the recent escalation the new regime. She acknowledged that the United in the United States endeavour to undermine and States had started to undertake flights over Nicara- overthrow the Sandinista Government constituted a guan territory after it had become aware of the growing threat for peace and security in Central actions and intentions of the Sandinistas towards America. He summed up his presentatton by point- their own citizens and nei hbours. She accused the ing out that (a) neither Nicaragua nor any other Nicaraguan authorities ok abusing the Council’s Central American or Caribbean country could be meeting to air baseless charges against the United considered as a geo olitical or strategic preserve of States and asked why Nicaragua had not responded the United States; ( 1) Nicaragua could not represent to repeated American initiatives for the reduction of a threat to the security of the United States; (c) tensions. Nicaragua stood ready to improve relations with the She stated categorically that her Government was United States on the basis of mutual respect and not about to invade any country and instead sought unconditional recognition of the Nicaraguan right to peace in Central America. She reiterated five points self-determination; (4 Nicaragua was willing to begin that could serve as the basis for a substantial immediately direct talks with the Government of the improvement of American-Nicaraguan relations, in- United States with the objective of reaching concrete cluding a commitment through reassertion of the Rio results; (P) the Farabundo Marti Front for National Treaty engagements to non-intervention and non- Liberation (FMLN) and the Revolutionary Demo- aggression;, a United States commitment concerning cratic Front (FDK) of El Salvador had authorized the actiwtlcs of Nicaraguan exiles and the enforce- him to transmit their willingness to bc in immediate ment of the Neutrality Act; a regional undertaking negotiations without pre-conditions; (a the Govcrn- not to import heavy offensive weapons and to reduce ment of Cuba had authorized him to communicate to the number of foreign military and security advisers the Council its willingness also to be in negotiations to a reasonably low level; a proposal to the United immediately; (R) the Governments o kNicaragua and States Congress for renewed United States aid to Cuba as well as the Salvadoran FMLN-FDK backed Nicaragua; and actions by the Nicaraguans to termi- the Mexican initiative for negotiations proposed on nate their military involvement in El Salvador. 21 February at Managua; (h) Nicaragua was willing In concludin her statement, she noted that the to sign immediately non-aggression pacts with all Government o18 Nicaragua, in submitting its appeal neighbouring countries; and (i) Nicaragua had to to the Council, had ignored procedures well estab- reject the attempt by the United States to impose lished in the Charter of the United Nations and the humiliating restrictions on its prerogatives regarding charter of the Organization of American States national defence. (OAS).* She referred in that connection to Article 52 He also conveyed his Government’s demand that of the Charter of the United Nations and to article 23 the United States Government put a halt to its of the OAS charter and argued that regional disputes destabilization plans and the organization and fi- should be submitted to regional bodies for discussion nancing of paramilitary forces advised and trained by and settlement before referring them to the Council. United States military personnel; put a stop to the She recalled the various occasions when OAS had use of Honduran territory as a base for armed been seized of the matter and underlined her Gov- aggression against Nicaragua; put a stop to the traffic ernment’s viewpoint that OAS was the appropriate in arms and counterrevolutionaries between the