EMPLOYMENT (AMENDMENT) BILL Order for Second Reading Read. 1.48 Pm the Minister for Labour (Dr Lee Boon Yang): Mr Speaker

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EMPLOYMENT (AMENDMENT) BILL Order for Second Reading Read. 1.48 Pm the Minister for Labour (Dr Lee Boon Yang): Mr Speaker Page 1 of 19 This report was printed from Singapore Parliament website. Parliament No: 8 Session No: 2 Volume No: 65 Sitting No: 1 Sitting Date: 01 -11 -1995 Section Name: BILLS Title: EMPLOYMENT (AMENDMENT) BILL MPs Speaking: Dr Lee Boon Yang (Minister for Labour); Encik Othman Bin Haron Eusofe; Mr Charles Chong; Mr Chin Harn Tong; Mr Low Thia Khiang; Mr Stephen Lee Ching Yen; Mr Tan Soo Khoon (Mr Speaker); Column: 40 EMPLOYMENT (AMENDMENT) BILL Order for Second Reading read. 1.48 pm The Minister for Labour (Dr Lee Boon Yang): Mr Speaker, Sir, I beg to move, "That the Bill be now read a Second time." The Employment (Amendment) Bill before the House today seeks to amend the Employment Act with consequential amendments to the Industrial Relations Act. Sir, last year, a Tripartite Review Committee comprising representatives from the Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF), the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and the Goverment was set up to review the Employment Act. The Committee was chaired by the then Minister of State for Labour, Mr Goh Chee Wee. The Committee adopted the following terms of reference: (a) Review the provisions in the Employment Act which have become irrelevant and not kept pace with the changing needs of employers, workers and the economy; (b) Review the provisions in the Employment Act which cause rigidities in the labour market and hinder company restructuring; and (c) Recommend changes to the Employment Act to address the issues reviewed. After some six months of careful study and thorough discussion, the Tripartite Committee was able to make extensive recommendations to modify and improve the existing Employment Act. Subsequently, Government accepted the recommendations made by the Committee. This Employment (Amendment) Bill has incorporated the Committee's recommendations with some refinements added since the Committee completed its deliberations. The refinements are the result of the extensive feedback received by my Ministry from both employers and unions representing workers regarding the implementation of Column: 41 some of the proposed amendments. Consequential amendments to the Industrial Relations Act will also be needed to bring it in line with the amendments to the Employment Act. http://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/topic.jsp?currentTopicID=00064901-ZZ&currentPubID... 12/10/2013 Page 2 of 19 The proposed amendments in this Bill will bring the provisions of the employment and industrial relations laws up-to-date. By passing this Bill, you will help to make our employment laws more responsive to the changing economic and business conditions and better suited to future developments. The House will note that this Bill covers many areas. Since the technical and minor details of the Bill have already been covered in the Explanatory Statement to the Bill, I propose to address only the key issues. New definitions and applications of rate of pay First, let me deal with the new definitions and applications of rate of pay. Clause 2 of the Bill introduces two new definitions - "basic rate of pay" and "gross rate of pay" to replace the existing "rate of pay" and "ordinary rate of pay" used in the current Employment Act for the purpose of computing statutory payments. This arose from the Tripartite Committee's recommendation to rationalise the basis for computing statutory payments to employees. The two new definitions of "basic rate of pay" and "gross rate of pay" will provide a clear and unambiguous basis for payment for overtime work, work on rest day or public holiday and payment for approved leave. This amendment will prevent unnecessary disputes between employers and employees on the types of allowances which should be included for the purpose of computing the various statutory payments. Sir, under the proposed amendment, "basic rate of pay" refers to the total remuneration excluding all allowances, overtime payment, bonus, annual wage supplement, reimbursement of special expenses and productivity incentive payments. The "basic rate of pay" shall be used to calculate payment for overtime Column: 42 work under clause 13, work on a rest day under clause 12, and for payment on a public holiday under clause 15. The rationale for paying only the basic rate of pay for these occasions is that, under the current law, employees are already entitled to a higher rate of compensation for overtime work and work on rest day or public holiday. For example, an employer is required to pay an employee a minimum of 1.5 times the hourly rate of pay for overtime work and 2 days' pay for work on a rest day. The second new definition "gross rate of pay" refers to the total remuneration including allowances except for overtime payments, bonus payments, annual wage supplement, travelling, food and housing allowances, reimbursement of special expenses and productivity incentive payments. It shall be used as a basis for computing payment in lieu of notice of termination under clause 3, salary deduction for absence from work under clause 8, payment for public holidays under clause 15, annual leave under clause 16, sick leave with hospitalisation under clause 17, and maternity leave under clause 27. The rationale for including allowances for these payments is that employees should not suffer a cut in their normal expected income as these are benefits earned in the course of their employment and their absence from work had been sanctioned or approved by their employers. Sick leave where hospitalisation is not necessary Sir, in the case of outpatient sick leave, the Tripartite Review Committee originally proposed that allowances should also be paid. However, employers have expressed concern that granting shift allowance to workers who are on outpatient sick leave would defeat the purpose of this allowance which is to motivate them to come to work on unpopular shifts. This is particularly so in the case of http://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/topic.jsp?currentTopicID=00064901-ZZ&currentPubID... 12/10/2013 Page 3 of 19 process industries which pay a sizeable shift allowance to ensure that their employees do not absent themselves from work when they are scheduled to work on unpopular shifts. While going on sick Column: 43 leave is a valid reason for an employee to stay away from work, there is concern that if this becomes rampant and workers stay away at the slightest feeling of discomfort, it would cause severe disruption to the shift work schedule. It would also be unfair if such workers continue to receive their shift allowance while their more responsible colleagues have to cover their duties in their absence. Replacements may also be necessary and the employer may have difficulty in getting relief workers at the last minute, apart from having to incur additional cost. Sir, to address such concern, clause 17 will allow shift allowance to be excluded as a statutory payment for workers on outpatient sick leave. Notwithstanding this, employers and employees or their unions could work out mutually agreeable rules under which the workers could still be paid their shift allowance when they are on outpatient sick leave. My Ministry, together with NTUC and SNEF, has formulated a set of tripartite guidelines regarding the circumstances under which employees should be paid their shift allowance while on outpatient sick leave. For example, an employee who is diagnosed to have contracted an infectious disease would have to stay away from work and therefore should not be penalised for taking outpatient sick leave. The guidelines will be issued by my Ministry after the Bill has been passed. Recovery of compensation for unfair dismissal Sir, clause 4 introduces a new subsection 7A to section 14 to enable the Court to recover compensation due to an employee whose employer has been found guilty of failing to comply with a Ministerial Order. This means that a worker who had been wrongfully dismissed would still be able to recover his compensation even if the employer defaults on the Ministerial Order. Transfer of employees Sir, I now come to the matter of transfer of employees. Clause 6 of the Bill Column: 44 concerns the transfer of employees. In a fast changing business environment, companies may need to restructure their operations to remain competitive. Restructuring could involve the redeployment or transfer of employees to an associated company, a subsidiary or a new company. Currently, the Employment Act allows employers to redeploy their employees within the same company. However, it is silent on the rights and obligations of the employers and employees in the transfer of employees to another company, including an associated company or a subsidiary. The common law viewpoint is that the consent of the affected employees must be sought to effect the transfer as this involves a change of employer which is a different legal entity. This could lead to protracted negotiations between the employers and employees or their union, causing damaging delays to a company's genuine restructuring exercise which could in fact have enhanced the employees' long-term job prospects. Sir, I would like to cite three examples where due to the absence of a clear legal framework on the rights and obligations of employers and employees in a transfer of employees to a different legal entity, protracted negotiations had taken place and company restructuring had been unnecessarily delayed or hindered. The first involved a fairly sizable local group of companies. As part of its business strategy to be more competitive, it decided to restructure its operations and set up a subsidiary to operate part of its supporting services. The restructuring involved the hiving -off of a major supporting service division http://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/topic.jsp?currentTopicID=00064901-ZZ&currentPubID... 12/10/2013 Page 4 of 19 and resulted in about 3,000 employees having to be transferred to the new subsidiary.
Recommended publications
  • Competing Narratives and Discourses of the Rule of Law in Singapore
    Singapore Journal of Legal Studies [2012] 298–330 SHALL THE TWAIN NEVER MEET? COMPETING NARRATIVES AND DISCOURSES OF THE RULE OF LAW IN SINGAPORE Jack Tsen-Ta Lee∗ This article aims to assess the role played by the rule of law in discourse by critics of the Singapore Government’s policies and in the Government’s responses to such criticisms. It argues that in the past the two narratives clashed over conceptions of the rule of law, but there is now evidence of convergence of thinking as regards the need to protect human rights, though not necessarily as to how the balance between rights and other public interests should be struck. The article also examines why the rule of law must be regarded as a constitutional doctrine in Singapore, the legal implications of this fact, and how useful the doctrine is in fostering greater solicitude for human rights. Singapore is lauded for having a legal system that is, on the whole, regarded as one of the best in the world,1 and yet the Government is often vilified for breaching human rights and the rule of law. This is not a paradox—the nation ranks highly in surveys examining the effectiveness of its legal system in the context of economic compet- itiveness, but tends to score less well when it comes to protection of fundamental ∗ Assistant Professor of Law, School of Law, Singapore Management University. I wish to thank Sui Yi Siong for his able research assistance. 1 See e.g., Lydia Lim, “S’pore Submits Human Rights Report to UN” The Straits Times (26 February 2011): On economic, social and cultural rights, the report [by the Government for Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review] lays out Singapore’s approach and achievements, and cites glowing reviews by leading global bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Response by Mr Lim Hng Kiang, Minister for Trade
    RESPONSE BY MR LIM HNG KIANG, MINISTER FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY DURING THE COMMITTEE OF SUPPLY DEBATE Let me take Mr Steve Chia’s question. I think, first, he must understand how to interpret statistics. When the statistics shows that the income has risen, it does not mean that there could not be 3 per cent people who are unemployed and therefore, the income has dropped. This is the per capita GNI, gross national income, which looks at the average numbers. 2 PM, in his speech on 19 Jan 2005, mentioned that the overall per capita income had increased since 1998 and I think, indeed, it had increased because the per capita income is a widely-used benchmark in international comparison. So, we are using internationally accepted statistics and the method of measuring statistics. The per capita income is obtained by dividing the gross national income (GNI) by the population and therefore, the gross national income which is the income receivable by all residents of the economy would include both Singaporeans and foreigners. 3 Mr Steve Chia claimed that this would distort the numbers because it would include the high-earning expatriates. I think he would realize that the number of expatriates and people with employment pass were in fact a smaller percentage compared with the larger pool of other types of foreign workers. So if anything, the foreigner element of the calculation in Singapore’s context would tend to drag the number down. Even if we excluded foreigners, the latest statistics showed that the average income of Singaporeans in 2004 is 10.1 per cent higher than in 1998; compared to 10 years ago, the average income of Singaporeans had increased by 25.1 per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • 9789814794282
    10.8mm Mano Sabnani Marbles, Mayhem andFor Review only My Typewriter In a world where so many people believe that they cannot go far because they were Marbles, Mayhem Marbles, not born gifted or with a silver spoon, Mano Sabnani’s story offers profound Mayhem inspiration – showing how an ordinary man can achieve extraordinary things by following a very simple and ethical and set of principles. My From greenhorn journalist to Editor of the Business Times, Managing Editor of the Straits Times, CEO/Editor-in-Chief Typewriter of TODAY, and Managing Director at DBS, Mano witnessed and the transformation of Singapore since independence and the painful trade-offs that had to be made as it achieved its My Typewriter phenomenal economic success. In Marbles, Mayhem and My Typewriter, Mano relates the story of his life, career and family, from an idyllic boyhood in Joo Chiat through to National Service, university days, a shoestring trek through Asia and Europe, marriage and fatherhood, to his role as an “activist investor” speaking up on behalf of ordinary shareholders. Along the way, Mano offers unique stories and special insight into a myriad of topics: friendship, leadership, values, the Marshall Cavendish existence of God, the role of man in nature – and life itself. BIOGRAPHY Editions ISBN-978-981-4794-28-2 The Unfadable Life of an Ordinary Man ,!7IJ8B4-hjecic! Mano Sabnani For Review only “Mano was a hitchhiker when Singaporean youths compared unfa- vourably with their Malaysian peers in the adventure sphere. He was a university publication editor when campus life was much more robust than now.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore in 2002: Economic Lassitude and Threats to Security
    SINGAPORE IN 2002 Economic Lassitude and Threats to Security William Case Abstract During 2002, Singapore’s government attempted to stimulate political life by encouraging debate among its backbenchers in parliament. It took steps also to revive economic competitiveness, adjusting tax incentives and targeting new industries. And it tried to perpetuate security, setting up a range of new agencies through which to deal with terrorist threats. Politics In Singapore’s last general election, held in 2001, the People’s Action Party (PAP) government strengthened its hold over parlia- ment, winning 82 of 84 seats. It thereby countered the opposition’s once- potent strategy of contesting in less than a majority of constituencies in hopes of maximizing protest votes, while acquiescing in the PAP’s return to office. Throughout 2002, then, the government, its mandate refreshed, met with few political challenges. To the contrary, it was left to deal with its perennial dilemma over how to fabricate some challenging discussion in parliament. Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong thus proposed in March that a People’s Ac- tion Forum of some 20 PAP backbenchers be formed to act as in-house crit- ics,1 providing some semblance of the opposition that parliament cannot. Though this proposal was eventually shelved, constraints were still loosened on parliamentary debate, except over constitutional, budgetary, and security matters. William Case is Senior Lecturer in the School of International Busi- ness and Asian Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. Asian Survey , 43:1, pp. 167–173. ISSN: 0004–4687 Ó 2003 by The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Round up Reply by Minister for Defence Teo Chee Hean in Parliament
    Round Up Reply by Minister for Defence Teo Chee Hean in Parliament 20 Jan 2006 Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, first of all, let me thank Members of the House for sharing their views and comments on this very important issue of National Service. Sir, I am heartened to hear Members of the House expressing their very strong support for National Service and to hear that their support is shared by their constituents. Indeed, it is such support for National Service and the commitment shown by our NSmen that make our nation's defence work. As I said, 700,000 Singaporeans have served National Service or are serving National Service and, without their commitment, we will not have the modern thriving Singapore that we have today. Sir, let me address now some of the specific issues that Members have raised. Alternative forms of National Service The need for flexibility Considering the talents and contributions of NS defaulters Post-graduate studies Pre-enlistees with special talents Citizens who left at a young age Permanent Residents' liability for National Service Alternative punishment for defaulters Conclusion As I have explained earlier, National Service has served a critical need and that is, in my view, the first principle of National Service. Firstly, criticality, secondly, universality, and thirdly, equity. That critical need is national defence and we should not be trading that off against other forms of service, whether it is in the social sector, in the arts or in sports, because they do not rank in the same way as that necessity for national defence.
    [Show full text]
  • ANOTHER OPENS 2 More Thanhalfacenturyold!Asweturnanotherpage T in Ourhistory, Welook Backtorememberthedifferent the JOURNEY the Labour Movement
    17 DECEMBER 2017 60 CENTS MCI (P) 102/12/2016 ONE PAGE CLOSES, ANOTHER OPENS 2 THE JOURNEY NTUC This Week 17 DECEMBER 2017 NTUC This Week: From the Beginning to Now, and Beyond The paper has been around for 53 years, and that’s more than half a century old! As we turn another page in our history, we look back to remember the different personalities the paper has put forth. By Shukry Rashid and Avelyn Ng his paper has taken on many names since its first publication in 1964; these run the line-up from Perjuangan N.T.U.C., Labour News, The Singaporean, NTUC News and the T current NTUC This Week (see page 3). Perjuangan means struggle in Malay, and the title captured the tone and essence of the 60s era. Perjuangan N.T.U.C. was published monthly and its aim, said its editor Devan Nair when it was first established, was twofold. Devan Nair, who was also concurrently NTUC’s first secretary-general, said: “On the one hand, we shall keep labour informed about essential issues, so that the chaff is easily distinguished from the grain, and sense from nonsense. On the other, we shall voice the just aspirations of labour without fear or favour.” From the outset, this publication was the voice of workers and the Labour Movement. It featured the difficulties workers faced with errant employers and communism, what was done to represent and protect the workers, and bring the issues to a fair agreement. But just as how the Labour Movement has evolved from one that was marred by unsettlement and strikes to one of good labour-management relations, so did the paper as it started focusing on the good collaborations between workers and employers, with the help of the Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech by Minister for Defence Teo Chee Hean at Committee of Supply Debate 2006
    Speech by Minister for Defence Teo Chee Hean at Committee of Supply Debate 2006 06 Mar 2006 Minister for Defence Teo Chee Hean Trends in our Security Environment Our Defence Policy Deterrence and Defence Diplomacy Defence Expenditure Transformation and the 3G SAF Training Safety Mr Chairman, Sir, I would first like to thank the Honourable Members for their comments and questions, and for their support and robust commitment to defence. Trends in our Security Environment Mr Ravindran, Mr Hawazi Daipi and Mr Steve Chia have asked for an assessment of our regional security environment. Sir, the geopolitical landscape of the Asia-Pacific region is in a state of flux. The shifts which are now taking place will lead to significant changes in the geostrategic balance. The US remains pre-eminent, with its superior military power, economic strength and political influence. But alongside this is a new reality - China and India, the two Asian giants, are now on the rise. This is reshaping the strategic contours of our region. What is less clear is what shape our region - and indeed the world - will take in the future. The situation will be made more complex by the greater assertiveness of Japan, and perhaps also a resurgent Russia, in the coming years. China and India have both abandoned autarky and are seeking economic linkages with the world. They are now both major trading and energy importing nations, and their search for foreign sources of raw materials and markets, as well as their dependence on them, can only grow. As a consequence, both China and India now have an interest in the security of sea routes, and of their energy sources.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Oct-Dec 2014
    Times GOLDENMCI (P) 048/01/2014 OCT-DEC 2014 IN THIS ISSUE... Lions Home Recognition Night > pg 4-7 Chairman’s Message “When people live to be Elders. The Lion H K Lau Award, inaugurated in 2004, is named after the late PCC Lion H K Lau. very old, let them rejoice in everyday of life.” Phase 1: The setting up of a Home for destitute was first initiated by the late PCC Lion H K Lau and some This is the motto in our senior Lions of the Lions Clubs of Singapore way back basic care and attention in 1980. The Home first started a humble 18-bed towards the residents of the shelter home for able-bodied destitute under a void Lions Home for the Elders. deck in HDB estate at Block 403, Ang Mo Kio Ave 10, providing them with free lodging and care. I quoted this remark in my speech during the Phase 2: In 1985, it expanded into a full-fledged Recognition Night on 13 December 2014. Nursing Home for the aged sick at a Post-war bunker in Toa Payoh Rise. There is a time for everything and a season for every activity. Phase 3: The Bedok Home officially opened on 16th November 1997. It was equipped with modern facilities By the end of December 2014, I would have come to a and could accommodate 154 residents. time that I will be completing my full term of four years in office as Chairman. Adding in another four years Phase 4: On 12 January 2003, Mr Lim Hng Kiang, then of office as 1st Vice Chairman, it would be a total of Minister for Health, officially opened the Toa Payoh Rise continuous eight years of serving in the Lions Home for Home with updated equipment and modern facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • 013348 Election
    FRIDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2001 1 First published in the Government Gazette, Electronic Edition, on 3rd December 2001 at 5:00 pm. No. 3334 – PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS ACT (CHAPTER 218) NOTICE UNDER SECTION 75 Notice is hereby given, pursuant to section 75 of the Parliamentary Elections Act, that the returns respecting the election expenses and statements by the candidates and their election agents in connection with the uncontested parliamentary elections held on 25th October 2001 were received from the election agents of the candidates whose names are set out in the first column of the Schedule on the dates set out in the second column thereof. The returns and statements may be inspected at the office of the Returning Officer, 11 Prinsep Link, Singapore 187949, during office hours on any working day during the period of 6 months from the date of the publication of this Notice. THE SCHEDULE First column Second column 1. Lee Hsien Loong 9th November 2001 2. Davinder Singh 13th November 2001 3. Foo Chee Keng Cedric 13th November 2001 4. Gan Lai Chiang 13th November 2001 5. Goh Chok Tong 13th November 2001 6. Lee Kuan Yew 13th November 2001 7. Lim Siang Keat Raymond 13th November 2001 8. Lim Swee Say 13th November 2001 9. Mohamad Maidin B P M 13th November 2001 10. Ng Eng Hen 13th November 2001 11. Othman Haron Eusofe 13th November 2001 12. R Ravindran 13th November 2001 13. Tan Hwee Hua @ Lim Hwee Hua 13th November 2001 14. Zainudin Nordin 13th November 2001 15. Zainul Abidin Rasheed 13th November 2001 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Chronology of Major International Events: 1945-1997
    1229 APPENDIX A CHRONOLOGY OF MAJOR INTERNATIONAL EVENTS: 1945-1997 1945, February 7 -22. Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin meet at Yalta, USSR. September 28-October 3. Nine·Power Conference at London, United May 7. Surrender of Germany. Kingdom. May 8. Proclamation of end of the war in Europe. October 23. A\lied occupation of West Germany ends. June 5. US Secretary of State Marshall calls for European Recovery Program November 29-December 2. Moscow (USSR) Conference of Communist (Marshall Plan). nations on European security. June 26. United Nations Charter signed at San Francisco, USA. 1955, February 18. Baghdad (Iraq) Pact signed by Iraq and Turkey. July 17 -Augustl. Churchill, Stalin, Truman meet at Potsdam, East Germany. April 18-24. Asian-African Conference at Bandung, Indonesia. August 6. US drops atomic bomb at Hiroshima, Japan. May 6. Western European Union (WEU) inaugurated by admitting Italy and September 2. Surrender of Japan. Federal Republic of Germany to Brussels Treaty. 1946, July 29-0ctober 15. Peace Conference meets at Paris, France. May 9. Federal Republic of Germany admitted to NATO. December 30. UN Atomic Energy Commission approves US proposal for May 14. Warsaw Pact signed by East European Communist governments. world control of atomic weapons. 1956, April 17. Cominform disbanded. 1947, February 10. Peace treaties signed with Bulgaria, Finland, Hungary, Italy, July 26. Egypt nationalizes Suez Canal. Romania. August 16-23. Suez Conference at London, United Kingdom. June 5. Marshall Plan inaugurated. October 23 -November 22. Anti·Communistrebellion in Hungary suppressed October 5. Communist Information Bureau (Cominform) established. by Soviet troops. October 29. Customs union between Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg October 29-November 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Movement Annual 2012 Part 3
    Affiliated Union and Association, 132 and Related Organisation Directory Labour Movement Annual 2012 132-133 union directory_ open.indd 132 4/23/12 8:35 PM AESU AUPDRW AUPE AUSBE AREU CIEU BATU DBSSU DSSU ESU EMSEU HSEU FDAWU HDBSU IRASSU KEU KFEU NTA MIWU NTWU NEU NPASU POU RLEU PUBEU SSEU - SEMBAWANG SMEEU SEEU SIASU SBEU SATSWU SBOA SCTU SGSWA SISEU SITU SIEU SMTU SMMWU SMOU SNUJ SPHEU SOS SPWU SRCEU SSEU - SHELL SSU STU STTU STEEU SUBE SURAWU SSSU TPGEU SUN UITS UPAGE USE UTES UWPI UWEEI CASE e2i OTC INSTITUTE SLF 132-133 union directory_ open.indd 133 4/23/12 8:35 PM 25 Airline Road Airline House Date of Registration SIN ALH 05-C 4 January 1965 Singapore 819829 Air Transport Executive Date of Affi liation to NTUC Tel: 6541 6089 January 1970 Staff Union Fax: 6545 7218 E-mail: [email protected] Term of Offi ce Website: www.aesu.org.sg 2010 to 2014 Trustees Chan Kam Wah Tan Le Liang Thong Ka Leong Executive Committee President Senior Vice-President Vice-President General Deputy General Assistant Supramaniam Vice-President Boey Charn Weng Francis Lim Secretary Secretary/ Treasurer Sinnakannu Peter Chua Swee Hock Martin Chan Treasurer Alex Lim Cheng Kiat Wing Sing Ravichandran P Yi Khung Member Member Member Member Joseph Tang Gopalan P Nair Lee Siok Buea Daniel Loh Weng Kwai Joo Shia Internal Auditor Internal Auditor Chong Ching Seng Melvyn Tay 134 Labour Movement Annual 2012 134 AESU_2012.indd 134 4/23/12 5:43 PM Date of Registration 261 Waterloo Street #04-10 6 May 1992 Waterloo Centre Amalgamated Union of Singapore 180261 Date of Affi
    [Show full text]
  • S.No Name Lawpractice 1 a J Ramachandran AJR Law Practice 2
    Annual Election for Council 2021 Category: Senior Nomination Date: 12 October 2020 S.No Name LawPractice 1 A J Ramachandran AJR Law Practice 2 A P M Ferlin Jayatissa Lexcompass LLC 3 A Rajandran A Rajandran 4 A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Asia Law Corporation Ibrahim 5 A Thamilselvan Subra TT Law LLC 6 Abdul Hamid Sultan S/O Yousoof A H Sultan & Associates Sultan 7 Abdul Jabbar Bin Karam Din Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP 8 Abdul Jalil Bin Muhammad Tahir A J Tahir Law Practice 9 Abdul Rohim Bin Sarip A. Rohim Noor Lila LLP 10 Abdul Salim Ahmed Ibrahim United Legal Alliance LLC 11 Abdullah Bin Shaik Abubakar Abdullah Shaik Abubakar 12 Abdur Raheem Bin Mohd Iqbal Advent Law Corporation 13 Abraham Tilak Kumar Abraham Logan & Partners 14 Adam Chong Yew Woon Low Yeap Toh & Goon LLP 15 Aftab Ahmad Khan s/o Teffail A A Khan Law Practice Mohamed Khan 16 Ahmad Khalis Bin Abdul Ghani K&L Gates Straits Law LLC 17 Ahmad Nizam Bin Abbas K&L Gates Straits Law LLC 18 Aileen Chong Nee Lim Aileen Aileen Chong & Co 19 Ajaib Hari Dass Haridass Ho & Partners 20 Ajinderpal Singh Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP 21 Alagappan s/o Arunasalam A Alagappan Law Corporation 22 Alain Abraham Johns Alain A Johns Partnership 23 Albert Yeo Toon Mok LegalWorks Law Corporation 24 Alexander Nathanael Walter Silvester Legal LLC 25 Allagarsamy s/o Palaniyappan Allagarsamy & Co 26 Allen Choong Kean Hin Allen & Gledhill LLP 27 Alli d/o Ruthirapathi Sim Mong Teck & Partners 28 Allister Lim Wee Sing ALP Law Corporation 29 Aloysius Tan Jun Liang Allen & Overy LLP 30 Alyson Lim Pek Bur Allen
    [Show full text]