DOCSLIB.ORG

Basingstoke Gateway Breeding Bird Survey Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Basingstoke Gateway Breeding Bird Survey Report Newlands Property Developments LLP Basingstoke Gateway Breeding Bird Survey Report June 2020 Land at Oakdown Farm, Basingstoke - Breeding Bird Survey Report fpcr FPCR Environment and Design Ltd Registered Office: Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby DE74 2RH Company No. 07128076. [T] 01509 672772 [F] 01509 674565 [E] [email protected] [W] www.fpcr.co.uk This report is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without the written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd. Ordnance Survey material is used with permission of The Controller of HMSO, Crown copyright 100018896. Rev Issue Status Prepared / Date Approved/Date - Draft PJP / 18 .0 6.20 MEL / 29.07.2020 1 Breeding Bird Survey Report – Land at Oakdown Farm, Basingstoke fpcr CONTENTS 1.0 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 LEGISLATION AND GUIDANCE .......................................................................................... 5 4.0 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 6 5.0 RESULTS.............................................................................................................................. 8 6.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 13 7.0 MITIGATION, ENHANCEMENTS AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS ......................................... 17 TABLES Table 1: Breeding Bird Survey Dates and Weather Conditions Table 2: Evaluation Criteria Table 3: NERC and/or BoCC Red- and Amber-Listed Bird Species Recorded at Land at Oakdown Farm, Basingstoke, during Breeding Bird Surveys 2020 and Their Recent Status in Hampshire Table 4: The Conservation Value of Each Bird Species Recorded within the Site Boundary Table 5: Habitat Requirements, Species Accounts, Nature Conservation Value, and Impact Assessment of BoCC Red/Amber-listed and S41 NERC Act Priority Species Recorded during Breeding Bird Surveys in 2020, Land at Oakdown Farm, Basingstoke FIGURES Figure 1: Bird Consultation Plan Figure 2: Breeding Bird Survey Results - Locations of Notable Species APPENDICES Appendix A: Land at Oakdown Farm, Basingstoke – 2020, Breeding Bird Survey Results and EOAC Criteria for Categorisation of Breeding Status 2 KI\\9300\9312\ECO\BBS/9312 BBS Report PJP Breeding Bird Survey Report – Land at Oakdown Farm, Basingstoke fpcr 1.0 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Construction of up to 271,000sq m of commercial and industrial floorspace, with associated landscaping and highways infrastructure, is proposed on a site located on land at Oakdown Farm, Basingstoke. A series of breeding bird surveys were completed in 2020, between April and June inclusive. This report assesses the bird assemblage recorded on site, providing mitigation, compensation, and enhancement measures where relevant. During breeding bird surveys, 30 species were recorded on-site, including nine notable species of medium to high conservation concern, with the remaining 21 species green-listed under the Birds of Conservation Concern (BoCC). The majority of these species are fairly common, widespread, or abundant birds in both Hampshire and the UK. The application site is assessed as being of no more than local conservation value for the majority of the assemblage, with no species found in numbers considered significant at a county, regional or national level. No statutory sites of international or national nature conservation importance, designated specifically for their breeding bird assemblages, were identified within 15km and 2km of the Application Site, respectively. Consequently, there are no ‘notable’ bird species associated with nearby statutory sites that may be a constraint to the proposals. Impacts of development were considered for the seven most vulnerable species recorded on-site. Mitigation for loss of breeding habitat for farmland birds such as skylark and yellowhammer will include creation of new hedgerows and grassland to the southwest, the enhancement of existing linear features (hedgerows and scrub belts), and the provision of species-specific nest boxes targeted towards similarly valued species, which will result in a negligible to minor-positive residual impact for the breeding bird assemblage. Other than in the short-term, i.e. during the construction phase, the proposals for green infrastructure and the suggested compensation methods (including installation of nest boxes), if implemented, are expected to have a minor-positive residual impact for the majority of notable species currently using the site during the breeding season, particularly generalist species such as song thrush, and dunnock, as well as several common species including blackbird, blue tit and goldfinch. The proposed GI, as detailed in the current framework plan, aims to retain some of existing hedgerows and scrub around the boundaries of the site, and will buffer existing areas of woodland immediately adjacent to the site. Native species planting will enhance these habitats and new habitat in the form of woodland, tussock-forming grassland, and wetland areas for sustainable drainage will be created to the southwest on the opposite side of the M3. The retention of existing vegetation and the creation of new habitats, along with the additional new resources provided to birds by the GI and nest boxes, will provide mitigation and compensation for the loss of suitable breeding and foraging habitats for many of the species recorded on-site. The proposed GI will maintain a degree of usable habitat around the site for a number of hedgerow and woodland species, providing green corridors for movement and dispersal into habitats present in the wider area. 3 KI\\9300\9312\ECO\BBS/9312 BBS Report PJP Breeding Bird Survey Report – Land at Oakdown Farm, Basingstoke fpcr 2.0 INTRODUCTION The following Breeding Bird Survey Report has been prepared by FPCR Environment and Design Ltd., on behalf of Newlands Property Developments, for land either side of the M3 at Junction 7, Basingstoke, Hampshire (central OS Grid Reference SU 583 468), hereafter referred to as the ‘Application Site’ or ‘Site’. It provides results of breeding bird surveys undertaken during April, May, and June 2020. The objectives of these surveys were to identify the breeding bird assemblage present within the Site and to identify any notable species of conservation importance that many pose potential ecological constraints to future development. The results will then be used to inform opportunities for ecological mitigation and enhancements within any future development design, with regard specifically to breeding bird species. Site Context The site comprises approximately 47.4ha of arable fields, woodland, and buildings with associated hardstanding bordered by hedgerows. Further parts of the site include those that will be subject to highways works and include section of woodland, road verges and hedges, and another area to the south of the M3 which will be used to create a bund made from material excavated from the development plot. One small garden pond was identified on-site, and one other was located within 250m of the application boundary after inspection of OS maps and aerial images. The development site is situated on the south-western side of Basingstoke, to the north of the M3. The A30 forms the site’s northern boundary, although an area of hedgerows, arable fields, and woodland to the north of this road is also within the site’s red line as there are highway improvements proposed to facilitate development. The site’s eastern boundary is formed by Winchester Road which is the road interchange with Junction 7 of the M3. Beyond this is an area of woodland and Basingstoke Golf Course. The western boundary is formed by Up Street, with farm buildings and arable fields and pasture beyond. Development Proposals The proposals are for construction of up to 271,000sq m of commercial and industrial floorspace, specifically B8 uses supported by ancillary B1 uses. Access will be via the A30, where highways works are proposed to ensure safe entry into the development. A number of mature trees, woodland and hedgerows within the site will be lost, as will the buildings and pond, but the majority of the boundary features will be retained and enhanced, with provision of green space, including balancing facilities, being envisaged in the north-eastern and south-western corners of the site. 4 KI\\9300\9312\ECO\BBS/9312 BBS Report PJP Breeding Bird Survey Report – Land at Oakdown Farm, Basingstoke fpcr 3.0 LEGISLATION AND GUIDANCE The Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended)1 is the principal legislation affording protection to UK wild birds. Under this legislation all birds, their nests and eggs are protected by law and it is an offence, with certain exceptions, to recklessly or intentionally: • Kill, injure, or take any wild bird • Take, damage, or destroy the nest of any wild bird, while in use or being built; and • Take or destroy the egg of any wild bird. Species listed on Schedule 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) are specially protected at all times. Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act 2006 Several birds
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species Are Listed in Order of First Seeing Them ** H = Heard Only
    Best of the Baltic - Bird List - July 2019 Note: *Species are listed in order of first seeing them ** H = Heard Only July 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th Mute Swan Cygnus olor X X X X X X X X Whopper Swan Cygnus cygnus X X X X Greylag Goose Anser anser X X X X X Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis X X X Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula X X X X Common Eider Somateria mollissima X X X X X X X X Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula X X X X X X Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator X X X X X Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo X X X X X X X X X X Grey Heron Ardea cinerea X X X X X X X X X Western Marsh Harrier Circus aeruginosus X X X X White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla X X X X Eurasian Coot Fulica atra X X X X X X X X Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus X X X X X X X Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus X X X X X X X X X X X X European Herring Gull Larus argentatus X X X X X X X X X X X X Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus X X X X X X X X X X X X Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common/Mew Gull Larus canus X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Tern Sterna hirundo X X X X X X X X X X X X Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea X X X X X X X Feral Pigeon ( Rock) Columba livia X X X X X X X X X X X X Common Wood Pigeon Columba palumbus X X X X X X X X X X X Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto X X X Common Swift Apus apus X X X X X X X X X X X X Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica X X X X X X X X X X X Common House Martin Delichon urbicum X X X X X X X X White Wagtail Motacilla alba X X
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Literature [17 5
    v 1940 Recent Literature [17 5 RECENT LITERATURE Reviews by Margaret M. Nice BANDING AND MIGRATION 1. Results from the First Ten Years of Banding Belgian Birds in the Nest. (R•sultats du Baguage au Nid des Oiseaux de Belgique pour les Dix PremieresAnn•es (1928-1938).) R. Verheyen. 1939. Bull. du Music royal d' Histoire nat. de Belgique,15 (49): 1-36.--A valuablepiece of work. As a rule nestlingsare found to return to the region of their birth, within 5, 10, 15 or 25 kilometersaccording to species. There were 447 casesof suchreturn and only a few exceptions(notably with the Cormorant (Phalacrocoraxcarbo) ), while a Sparrow Hawk (Accipiter nisus) settled 62 kilometersfrom its birthplace and a Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus)130. Of 5 species132-228 birds were retaken, of 5 othersfrom 51-82, and of 6 othersfro TM 25-44. In 15 of thesethe mortality during the first two yearsranged between 76 and 92 per cent,(with the Jackdaw (Coleusmonedula) it was 44 per cent), the averageof all being82 per cent. A large number of speciesare found to be only partially migratory: Sparrow Hawk, Stock Dove (Co!umbaoenas), Skylark (Alauda arvensis),Mistle Thrush ( Turdusviscivorus), Redl•reast (Erithacus rubecula), Greenfinch (Chloris chloris), Chaffinch(Fringilla coelebs),Great Tit (Parus major), Pied Wagtail (Motacilla alba,),and Starling (Sturnusvulgaris). Data are given on longevity. Mention is made of a BlackheadedGull ( Larus ridibundus)taken in Labrador in September 1933. The total numberof youngbanded in the nest is not given. It would be of great interest to have a similar study of returns and recoveriesof nestlings bandedin this country.
    [Show full text]
  • A Risk Assessment of Mandarin Duck (Aix Galericulata) in the Netherlands
    van Kleunen A. & Lemaire A.J.J. A. & Lemaire van Kleunen van Kleunen A. & Lemaire A.J.J. A. & Lemaire van Kleunen A risk assessment of Mandarin Duck in the Netherlands A A risk assessment of Mandarin Duck in the Netherlands A A risk assessment of Mandarin Duck (Aix galericulata) in the André van Kleunen & Adrienne Lemaire Netherlands Sovon-report 2014/15 Sovon Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology Sovon-report 2014/15 Postbus 6521 Sovon 6503 GA Nijmegen Toernooiveld 1 -report 2014/15 6525 ED Nijmegen T (024) 7 410 410 E [email protected] I www.sovon.nl A risk assessment of Mandarin Duck in the Netherlands A risk assessment of Mandarin Duck (Aix galericulata) in the Netherlands A. van Kleunen & A.J.J. Lemaire Sovon-report 2014/15 This document was commissioned by: Office for Risk Assessment and Research Team invasive alien species Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA) Ministry of Economic Affairs Sovon/report 2014-15 Colophon © 2014 Sovon Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology Recommended citation: van Kleunen A. & Lemaire A.J.J. 2014. A risk assessment of Mandarin Duck (Aix Galericulata) in the Netherlands. Sovon-report 2014/15. Sovon Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, Nijmegen. Lay out: John van Betteray Foto’s: Frank Majoor, Marianne Slot, Ana Verburen & Roy Verhoef Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland (Sovon Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology) Toernooiveld 1 6525 ED Nijmegen e-mail: [email protected] website: www.sovon.nl ISSN: 2212-5027 Nothing of this report may be multiplied or published by means of print, photocopy, microfilm or any other means without written consent by Sovon and/or the commissioning party.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Ile
    ISSN 0144-5 88x NEWSLETTER ile. ·~ Volume3 Part 9 1984 Biology Curators' Group L .d. •. CONTENTS BCG Newsletter vol.3 no.9 Editorial 487 Errata 487 Letters 438 Local Records Centres and Environmental Recording Where do we go from here 7 (C.J.T.Copp) ••• 489 The Need of Local Authorities for Environmental . ·~ Information (K.Francis) .... 498 Biological Site Recording at Sheffield Museum (S.P.Garland & D.Whiteley) . 504 Herbarium of Sir~. Benjamin Stone (B.Abell Seddon) 517 Sources of Biological Records "The Naturalist" Part 3 (W.A.Ely) 519 Society for the History of Natural History 530 Plant Galls Bulletin 530 The Duties of Natural History (P.Lingwood) 531 Publicity for Museum Insect Collections (S.Judd) 534 Help for Flora Compiling (BSBI) 534 Book News and Reviews 535 AGM - Report of the inquorate AGM held at Brighton on 6th April 1984 IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ 536 Wants, Exchanges, Lost & Found 537 EDITORIAL - This issue contains many interesting contributions, many of which discuss various aspects of biological recording. Charles Copp's paper could well provide a sound basis for discussions at the forthcoming seminar at Leicester. The contribution from Keith Francis resulted from a very interesting meeting on biological recording at Oxford County Museum under the AMSSEE flag. It is hoped that the editors may be able to include some contributions from other speakers at this meeting in a future issue. We have had our article in its finished state for over two years as an emergency reserve and now seemed like a useful time to publish it. It has been heavily biased towards biological recording of late, but that is the subject which members seem most eloquent about.
    [Show full text]
  • Skomer Island Bird Report 2017
    Skomer Island Bird Report 2017 Page 1 Published by: The Wildlife Trust of South and West Wales The Nature Centre Fountain Road Tondu Bridgend CF32 0EH 01656 724100 [email protected] www.welshwildlife.org For any enquiries please contact: Skomer Island c/o Lockley Lodge Martins Haven Marloes Haverfordwest Pembrokeshire SA62 3BJ 07971 114302 [email protected] Skomer Island National Nature Reserve is owned by Natural Resources Wales and managed by The Wildlife Trust of South and West Wales. More details on visiting Skomer are available at www.welshwildlife.org. Seabird monitoring on Skomer Island NNR is supported by JNCC. Page 3 Table of Contents Skomer Island Bird Report 2017 ............................................................................................................... 5 Island rarities summary 2017 .......................................................................................................................... 5 Skomer Island seabird population summary 2017 .......................................................................................... 6 Skomer Island breeding landbirds population summary 2017 ....................................................................... 7 Systematic list of birds ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Rarity Report ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Pigeon Names Columba Livia, ‘C
    Thomas M. Donegan 14 Bull. B.O.C. 2016 136(1) The pigeon names Columba livia, ‘C. domestica’ and C. oenas and their type specimens by Thomas M. Donegan Received 16 March 2015 Summary.—The name Columba domestica Linnaeus, 1758, is senior to Columba livia J. F. Gmelin, 1789, but both names apply to the same biological species, Rock Dove or Feral Pigeon, which is widely known as C. livia. The type series of livia is mixed, including specimens of Stock Dove C. oenas, wild Rock Dove, various domestic pigeon breeds and two other pigeon species that are not congeners. In the absence of a plate unambiguously depicting a wild bird being cited in the original description, a neotype for livia is designated based on a Fair Isle (Scotland) specimen. The name domestica is based on specimens of the ‘runt’ breed, originally illustrated by Aldrovandi (1600) and copied by Willughby (1678) and a female domestic specimen studied but not illustrated by the latter. The name C. oenas Linnaeus, 1758, is also based on a mixed series, including at least one Feral Pigeon. The individual illustrated in one of Aldrovandi’s (1600) oenas plates is designated as a lectotype, type locality Bologna, Italy. The names Columba gutturosa Linnaeus, 1758, and Columba cucullata Linnaeus, 1758, cannot be suppressed given their limited usage. The issue of priority between livia and domestica, and between both of them and gutturosa and cucullata, requires ICZN attention. Other names introduced by Linnaeus (1758) or Gmelin (1789) based on domestic breeds are considered invalid, subject to implicit first reviser actions or nomina oblita with respect to livia and domestica.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Risk Assessment
    PEST RISK ASSESSMENT Indian ringneck parrot Psittacula krameri Photo: Garg 2007. Image from Wikimedia Commons licenced under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported April 2011 This publication should be cited as: Latitude 42 (2011) Pest Risk Assessment: Indian ringneck parrot (Psittacula krameri). Latitude 42 Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd. Hobart, Tasmania. About this Pest Risk Assessment This pest risk assessment is developed in accordance with the Policy and Procedures for the Import, Movement and Keeping of Vertebrate Wildlife in Tasmania (DPIPWE 2011). The policy and procedures set out conditions and restrictions for the importation of controlled animals pursuant to s32 of the Nature Conservation Act 2002. For more information about this Pest Risk Assessment, please contact: Wildlife Management Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Address: GPO Box 44, Hobart, TAS. 7001, Australia. Phone: 1300 386 550 Email: [email protected] Visit: www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au Disclaimer The information provided in this Pest Risk Assessment is provided in good faith. The Crown, its officers, employees and agents do not accept liability however arising, including liability for negligence, for any loss resulting from the use of or reliance upon the information in this Pest Risk Assessment and/or reliance on its availability at any time. Pest Risk Assessment: Indian ringneck parrot Psittacula krameri 2/19 1. Summary The Indian ringneck parrot (Psittacula krameri) is a pale yellow-green parrot with a distinguishing long tail which lives in tropical and subtropical lightly wooded habitats in Africa and Asia. It feeds mainly on seeds, fruit, flowers and nectar.
    [Show full text]
  • Streptopelia Decaocto Global Invasive Species Database (GISD)
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Streptopelia decaocto Streptopelia decaocto System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Aves Columbiformes Columbidae Common name Rola-turca (Portuguese, Portugal), Tortora dal collare (Italian, Italy), Turkduva (Swedish, Sweden), Kolchataya Gorlitsa (Russian, Russia), Eurasian collared-dove (English), Indian ring-dove (English), Sierpówka (Polish, Poland), Türkentaube (German, Germany), Tórtola turca (Spanish, Spain), Tourterelle turque (French, France), Turkinkyyhky (Finnish, Finland), collared dove (English), Turkse Tortel (Dutch, Netherlands), Tyrkerdue (Danish), Balkáni gerle (Hungarian, Hungary) Synonym Columba risoria decaocto Similar species Summary The Eurasian collared-dove (Streptopelia decaocto) is an extremely successful invader capable of phenomenal range expansion despite geographic barriers. In Europe, it spread from Turkey and the Balkans colonizing almost every country in Western Europe in a matter of 30 years, becoming viable breeders within two years of invasion. Believed introduced to the West Indies by accidental release of a pet trader in 1974, Eurasian collared-doves have spread throughout the Caribbean. In the early 1980's they invaded Florida and quickly established localities throughout the southeastern United States. Researchers cite factors such as genetic mutation, keen adaptation to human-dominated environments, and high reproductive potential as possible explanations for their abundant range expansion. Negative impacts include competition with endemic birds and potential disease transmission. view this species on IUCN Red List Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) 2021. Species profile Streptopelia decaocto. Pag. 1 Available from: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1269 [Accessed 28 September 2021] FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Streptopelia decaocto Species Description The Eurasian collared-dove (Streptopelia decaocto) is a stocky, medium-sized dove.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtle Doves (Streptopelia Turtur Linnaeus, 1758) in Saudi Arabia
    LIFE14 PRE/UK/000002 International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the European Turtle-dove Streptopelia turtur (2018 to 2028) European Union (EU) International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the European Turtle-dove Streptopelia turtur LIFE14 PRE/UK/000002 Project May 2018 Produced by Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) Prepared in the framework of the EuroSAP (LIFE14 PRE/UK/000002) LIFE preparatory project, coordinated by BirdLife International and co-financed by the European Commission Directorate General for the Environment, the African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbird Agreement (AEWA), and each of the project partners Disclaimer and date of adoption/approval: - Approved at the European Union Nature Directives Expert Group meeting on the 22-23 May 2018 by Member States of the European Union, with the following disclaimer: “Malta, Spain, Italy, Romania and and the Federation of Associations for Hunting and Conservation of the EU (FACE) do not support measure 3.1.1 "Implement a temporary hunting moratorium until an adaptive harvest management modelling framework (Action 3.2.1) is developed”; Bulgaria, Cyprus and Greece do not approve the Species Action Plan because of the inclusion of measure 3.1.1.; France considers that measure 3.1.1 is not relevant on its territory because it will implement an adaptive harvest management modelling framework from the beginning of 2019; Portugal will support Action 3.1.1 only if it is applied in all Member-states along the western flyway range, in order to be effective; Austria opposes the moratorium, since it considers it goes beyond the requirements of the Birds Directive.” - Adopted by the 48th meeting of the CMS Standing Committee on 23-24 October 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklists of Protected and Threatened Species in Ireland. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No
    ISSN 1393 – 6670 N A T I O N A L P A R K S A N D W I L D L I F E S ERVICE CHECKLISTS OF PROTECTED AND THREATENED SPECIES IN IRELAND Brian Nelson, Sinéad Cummins, Loraine Fay, Rebecca Jeffrey, Seán Kelly, Naomi Kingston, Neil Lockhart, Ferdia Marnell, David Tierney and Mike Wyse Jackson I R I S H W I L D L I F E M ANUAL S 116 National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) commissions a range of reports from external contractors to provide scientific evidence and advice to assist it in its duties. The Irish Wildlife Manuals series serves as a record of work carried out or commissioned by NPWS, and is one means by which it disseminates scientific information. Others include scientific publications in peer reviewed journals. The views and recommendations presented in this report are not necessarily those of NPWS and should, therefore, not be attributed to NPWS. Front cover, small photographs from top row: Coastal heath, Howth Head, Co. Dublin, Maurice Eakin; Red Squirrel Sciurus vulgaris, Eddie Dunne, NPWS Image Library; Marsh Fritillary Euphydryas aurinia, Brian Nelson; Puffin Fratercula arctica, Mike Brown, NPWS Image Library; Long Range and Upper Lake, Killarney National Park, NPWS Image Library; Limestone pavement, Bricklieve Mountains, Co. Sligo, Andy Bleasdale; Meadow Saffron Colchicum autumnale, Lorcan Scott; Barn Owl Tyto alba, Mike Brown, NPWS Image Library; A deep water fly trap anemone Phelliactis sp., Yvonne Leahy; Violet Crystalwort Riccia huebeneriana, Robert Thompson Main photograph: Short-beaked Common Dolphin Delphinus delphis,
    [Show full text]
  • Some Calls and Displays of the Picazuro Pigeon (Columba Picazuro) Are Described and Compared with Those of Other Speciesof Pigeons
    418 Vol. 66 SOME CALLS AND DISPLAYS OF THE PICAZTJRO PIGEON By DEREK GOODWIN For the past two years I have made occasional observations at the London Zoo on a captive Picazuro Pigeon (Columba picazuro) from Argentina. In March, 1962, I spent four days at the Chester Zoo and devoted some time each day to watching several Picazuro Pigeons in a large aviary. One pair of these birds was beginning to nest. My observations are, obviously, very incomplete but seem worth recording as I can find no detailed descriptions of the calls or behavior patterns of this pigeon in the literature, apart from various renderings of the advertising coo and a description of the display flight as being like that of the Rock Dove, CoZumba Ziz& (Wetmore, 1926). I have used the same terminology (Goodwin, 1956~) that I previously employed when discuss- ing some Old World species of pigeons, as they seem equally useful for the Picazuro Pigeon. GENERAL APPEARANCE AND GAIT Columba picezuro walks on the ground with a more agile and less waddling manner than does the Wood Pigeon (Columba palumbus). It appears to me closer in this re- spect to such ground feeding species as the Rock Dove or Stock Dove (C. oenas). It has been described (Hudson, 1920: 154-155) as being extremely like the Wood Pigeon in all respects except color. Wetmore (1926), however, gives a fuller description of its gait, flight, and appearance in the wild which suggeststhat, as speciesof Columba go, it does not in the least resemble the Wood Pigeon. This confirms the.impression I have from captive individuals.
    [Show full text]