DOCSLIB.ORG

Dec Newsletter Web.Qxd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dec Newsletter Web.Qxd Michigan Campaign Finance Network Campaign Finance Talk The Voice of the Michigan Campaign Finance Network December 2002 Proxies Overshadow Candidate Committees in 2002 Gubernatorial Election roxy groups, mainly the state Republican and fastly refused to disclose any data, despite an appeal that Democratic parties, spent more than three times as the information was controversial and in the public’s much as the candidates’ own campaign committees interest to know. Using data from the Campaign Media P in Michigan’s 2002 gubernatorial general election Analysis Group (CMAG), MCFN conservatively calculated campaign. Lieutenant Governor Dick Posthumus and Attorney estimated values for advertising buys at the four remaining General Jennifer Granholm each accepted $1.125 million in stations. public funds for the fall election campaign and therefore were obliged to limit their spending to $2 million each through Why use a proxy? their candidate committees. The political parties and the Three factors contribute to the strategy of campaigning Michigan Chamber of Commerce, on the other hand, spent at through proxies. First, it allows the supporters of the least $13.5 million. respective candidates to spend beyond the limit that is Approximately $10 million of the third party spending paid imposed on candidates as a condition of accepting public for undisclosed television “issue” advertising that did not financing. appear in any campaign finance report. Aside from television Secondly, it accommodates very large contributions. advertising, the Republican Party reported $1.3 million in Contributions to the parties or political action committees independent expenditures supporting Mr. Posthumus. The (PACs) are not subject to any limits in Michigan. Whereas Democratic Party reported spending an additional $87,000 individuals can give a maximum of $3,400 to a statewide for independent expenditures supporting Ms. Granholm and candidate’s committee and PACs can give a maximum of $117,000 opposing Mr. Posthumus. The Michigan Campaign Finance Network (MCFN) conducted a Third Party Television Advertising sweep of the public advertising files for 25 television broadcasters in all in Michigan’s 2002 Gubernatorial General Election the state’s television markets in the Estimated Amount weeks following the November 5th Supporting Granholm/Opposing Posthumus Total Disclosed election. Records of issue ad pur- chases were available in the public MI Democratic State Central Committee $ 7.2 million $ 0 files from 17 of the 25 stations. Of Supporting Posthumus/Opposing Granholm the remaining eight stations, four disclosed purchase summaries for MI Republican State Committee $ 3.7 million $ 2.2 million the Democratic and Republican par- MI Chamber of Commerce $ 1.1 million $ 0 ties and the Chamber to MCFN. Total $12.0 million $2.2 million The four remaining stations stead- Campaign Finance Talk • 1 Gubernatorial from page 1 Opinion by Rich Robinson $34,000, they are allowed Lame Duck Gaming to give as much as they want to the parties, who, in turn, can make independent ne of the controver- mission, where he is currently expenditures without limit. sial acts of the lame chairman, speaks to the depth Likewise, national party duck Legislature of the relationships. organizations are allowed to O was the passage of contribute without limits to a resolution directing Was this deal an inevitabili- the state parties. Governor Engler to negotiate ty that was simply done a Class III gaming compact sooner rather than later, and Finally, the issue ad loop- serendipitously benefits the hole allows campaigns to with the Gun Lake Band of Pottawatomi Indians. In 1998, governor’s old friends? Did bring corporate and union the Legislature strong-arm at the time the last four Indian treasury money into play. Governor Engler and make gaming compacts were being Detroit News as financial Corporations and unions are him do a deal he didn’t want negotiated, the governor partners in the proposed prohibited from making to do? Did the governor wrote to then-Speaker of the casino, W. Sidney Smith, contributions to candidates, strong-arm the Legislature to House Chuck Perricone that Barton LaBelle and James the parties or PACs for elec- give him cover to do a hurry- he would not negotiate Fabiano, put $115,000 into tioneering purposes. How- up deal (no resolution was another gaming compact, the Governmental Consult- ever, issue ads are not con- actually required to negotiate specifically not with the Gun ing Services Inc. (GCSI) sidered to be electioneering the compact)? Or was this Lake Band. Over time, the PAC this election cycle to under state law, so unions simply lame duck legislative governor’s position changed make campaign contribu- and corporations are free to sausage-making? You have and he said he would negoti- tions to House members and make contributions to fund to connect the dots and ate a compact with the Gun lobby for the compact. Their them. decide for yourself. Lake Band if the Legislature contributions were more than Furthermore, in contrast to directed him to do so. During 90% of the money received There is room for honor- by the PAC. In defending the federal law, where such soft the last week of the lame able persons to disagree effort, a GCSI spokesman money contributions are duck session, the Legislature about what drove the resolu- said, “That’s the way every- reported to the Federal Elec- resolved that the governor tion. But this case is a strik- one who gets involved does tion Commission, soft money should negotiate the compact. ing example of a contradic- it. It’s called democracy.” contributions to the state par- tion in the laws governing Supporters of the compact ties are not reported to the LaBelle, Smith and Fabi- gaming interests and cam- cited the fact that the state Secretary of State. ano, along with their respec- paign contributions in Michi- has negotiated a compact tive spouses, have also been gan. Those who are financial Why does it matter? with all the state’s other fed- generous supporters of Gov- stakeholders or significant erally recognized tribes and Just as so-called aggressive ernor Engler’s campaigns suppliers to state regulated said it was a matter of equity. corporate accounting has over the years. They have casinos (the three Detroit Furthermore, they argued, caused investors to withdraw collectively given more than casinos) are prohibited from the tribe would proceed with from financial markets, “cre- $40,000 to the governor’s making contributions to can- the casino development with ative” accounting in election campaigns over his last two didates for public office. But or without the compact and campaigns is alienating to vot- that is a provision of the the state would simply miss elections. Campaign finance state’s gaming law, not the ers. Our democracy would be out on a badly needed rev- records for 1990 and all prior campaign finance law. And better served by a campaign enue stream if it didn’t nego- years have been destroyed, so the state gaming law does finance system where limits tiate. Opponents, including there is no verifying the full not govern tribal gaming are real and all spending is nearly the entire west Michi- extent of their campaign con- facilities. Because the cam- clearly on the books. gan delegation of both cham- tributions. But perhaps the paign finance law is silent on bers, argued that their con- fact that the governor has — An expanded version of financial stakeholders in stituents did not want gam- appointed Smith and Fabiano this report, including gaming facilities, those who ing and the related social to the Board of Trustees of various funding vehicles are involved in tribal gaming problems in their region. Central Michigan University, involved in the gubernatorial where Fabiano is currently facilities (other than the primary campaigns, is Three Mount Pleasant busi- vice-chairman, and LaBelle tribes, themselves) are free to online at www.mcfn.org. nessmen, identified by The to the Transportation Com- invest in candidates. Campaign Finance Talk • 2 — FROM THE DESK OF THE DIRECTOR — Dear Friend, When I joined the Michigan stand in support of public funding publicly supported non-profit 501 Campaign Finance Network two for Michigan’s Supreme Court (c) (3) organization. Currently, most years ago, many people I talked with campaigns. There is still plenty more of our funding comes from founda- had a vague uneasiness about cam- spade work to be done before this tions and organizations concerned paign finances, but very few people reform ideal becomes a reality, but we about campaign finance reform. In really knew how the game is played. I are an important part of the process the next two years, the IRS requires think we have had some real success of persuading opinion leaders. us to receive a minimum of 10% of in telling the story and providing the our support from individuals and a media with the data and information I am very proud to let you know more diverse base of organizations. that make them more effective in that our Board of Directors is grow- Already, several individuals and telling the story. This is the issue that ing. This month five distinguished organizations have given us their touches all other issues. new members have joined us: State financial support. Won’t you join Senators Alma Wheeler Smith and them? Your contribution gives you By the time you receive this Joe Schwarz, who are both leaving the satisfaction of knowing you are newsletter, I hope you will have seen the Senate due to term limits, but supporting an important cause, and a story in your local newspaper bringing us their deep commitment to it is tax deductible. based on the front-page article of this integrity in public policy; former newsletter. I am reasonably confident State Representative Bill Bobier, who We appreciate your support.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Case for Political Reform in Michigan Michigan Campaign Finance Network
    A Case for Political Reform in Michigan MICHIGAN CAMPAIGN FINANCE NETWORK BOARD OF DIRECTORS John Chamberlin Jan Dolan Patricia Donath Andy Draheim H. Lynn Jondahl John M. Koval Lynne Martinez John P. Mayer Susan Grimes Munsell Rich Robinson, executive director The work of the Michigan Campaign Finance Network is sustained by contributions from concerned Michigan citizens and the generous support of the Joyce Foundation of Chicago. ©2007 Michigan Campaign Finance Network Michigan Campaign Finance Network 200 Museum Drive, Lansing, MI 48933 Phone: (517) 482-7198 • Email: [email protected] • Web: www.mcfn.org Introduction and Executive Summary....................................................1 Campaign Finance – Failures of Limits and Accountability..............3 Too.infrequent.reporting Contribution.limits:.Some.committees.have.them,.some.don’t Extraordinary.self-funding Limits.for.lame.ducks Table.of. Late.independent.expenditures.are.reported.too.late Contents Issue.advocacy:.A.convenient.fiction Public.financing.of.gubernatorial.campaigns Public.financing.of.Supreme.Court.campaigns Public.financing.for.all.State.campaigns Lobbying – Insufficient Disclosure........................................................16 Insufficient.disclosure Slowing.the.revolving.door Ethics – High Standards for All..............................................................19 Standards.of.conduct.for.all Disclosure.of.personal.financial.interests Term Limits – The High Cost of Inexperience....................................21 Redistricting – Competition
    [Show full text]
  • State Senator Richard Posthumus: a Profile
    State Senator Richard Posthumus: A Profile by David Kimball, Senior Consultant for Public Policy At age 40 Senator Dick Posthumus regularly is heralded as one of the brightest stars of Michigan's Republican Party. His star still is rising: The election that just gave Posthumus his third Senate term also propelled his close, longtime friend John Engler to the governorship, and in the Senate Republican caucus last week Posthumus won the majority leader's post, a position formerly held by Engler. Respected by his colleagues and widely considered a born politician with uncanny tactical instincts, Posthumus is unassumingly self-confident and wears an easy smile on a youthtd, untroubled countenance. He credits much of this interpemnal ease to the fact that he punctuates his time at the capitol with the daiIy commute to his AIto (near Grand Rapids) home where he grows cash crops on a 600-acre family farm. "You can get so deeply into politics that everything else becomes secondary and family life tends to be destroyed," he says. "When I first decided to xun I made a commitment that I was not going to let that happen-that my family was going to come first no matter what. One of the ways I accomplish that is by going home every night." Although Posthumus occasionally stays in Lansing after a late session, these exceptions are relatively rare. "When I get home, there are four kids dngaround hollering, and all of a sudden I'm back to reality. There's no lobbyist taking me out to dinner telling me what a great legislator I am." "I can honestly say," he muses, "that I could walk away from this job tomorrow-not without some feeling of loss-but with no regret.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME ED 390 434 IR 055 781 TITLE a Manual For
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 390 434 IR 055 781 TITLE A Manual for Michigan State Documents Deposi,tory Libraries. INSTITUTION Michigan Library, Lansing. PUB DATE 94 NOTE 65p. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom Use (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Depository Libraries; *Government Publications; *Library Administration; Library Materials; Library Networks; Library Role; Library Services; *Library Technical Processes; State Programs IDENTIFIERS Historical Background; Library of Michigan; *Michigan ABSTRACT This manual contains information about the Michigan Documents Depusitory Library Program as administered by the Library of Michigan, a brief history of the program, the types of publications distributed, and guidance on handling and processing depository shipments. The first section briefly outlines the history of the Michigan documents depository library program. Section 2, "Library of Michigan Administration of the Depository Program," contains details about the role the Library of Michigan plays in overseeing the program, a profile of the member libraries, some general procedures, and information about how depository documents are distributed. The third section, "Guidelines for Managing a Michigan Documents Depository," explains how depository documents should be dealt with after their arrival at the depository, including technical processing, claim procedures, and retention and weeding policies. "Resources for Effective Public Services," the fourth section, serves as an introduction to document acquisition and to some online search tools; it includes a suggested core list of Michigan state documents. Seven appendices contain laws pertaining to the depository library program, a directory of the depository library system, a sample shipping list, classification scheme, filing rules, a bibliographic aid for locating pre-1952 documents, and a document price list.(BEW) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Program Spending and State Fiscal Crises
    Finegold, Schardin, Maag, Steinbach, Merriman, and Weil Occasional Paper The Urban Institute http://www.urban.org E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 202.429.0687 Phone: 202.833.7200 Washington, DC 20037 2100 M Street, NW SocialSocial ProgramProgram SpendingSpending andand StateState FiscalFiscal CrisesCrises Social Program Spending and State Fiscal Crises KennethKenneth FinegoldFinegold StephanieStephanie SchardinSchardin ElaineElaine MaagMaag RebeccaRebecca SteinbachSteinbach DavidDavid MerrimanMerriman AlanAlan WeilWeil Occasional Paper Number 70 Permit No. 8098 Nonprofit Org. Assessing U.S. Postage Mt. Airy, MD PAID the New Federalism An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies Social Program Spending and State Fiscal Crises Kenneth Finegold Stephanie Schardin Elaine Maag Rebecca Steinbach David Merriman Alan Weil Occasional Paper Number 70 The Urban Institute 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 Assessing Phone: 202.833.7200 the New Fax: 202.429.0687 Federalism E-mail: [email protected] An Urban Institute http://www.urban.org Program to Assess Changing Social Policies Copyright © November 2003. The Urban Institute. All rights reserved. Except for short quotes, no part of this paper may be reproduced in any form or used in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the Urban Institute. This report is part of the Urban Institute’s Assessing the New Federalism project, a multiyear effort to monitor and assess the devolution of social programs from the federal to the state and local levels. Alan Weil is the project director. The project analyzes changes in income support, social services, and health programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerald R. Ford Oral History Project John Engler Interviewed by Richard Norton Smith January 27, 2010
    Gerald R. Ford Oral History Project John Engler Interviewed by Richard Norton Smith January 27, 2010 Smith: First of all, thank you so much for doing this. Engler: Well, thank you, I’m happy to sit down. Smith: I want to talk a little about you and your entry into the big ring, if you will. You were a leading member of this whole generation of Republican governors, conservative Republican governors, who nevertheless were seen as creative in their conservatism, as problem solvers. I don’t know whether pragmatists is a misnomer or a pejorative, but in any event I would have thought that would have been very, very much Gerald Ford’s style; very reflective of his approach as well. Tell us about your life before it crossed paths with President Ford. Engler: My first meeting with Gerald Ford that I can recall, where I actually had a chance to sit and talk with him, was when Elford [Al] Cederberg, one of his colleagues from the Congress, brought him to Mt. Pleasant, Michigan to speak to a little Lincoln Day dinner for Isabella County. It always struck me, the humility of the leader of the Republicans of the United States House of Representatives out on the road. And, of course, it was only later – I was a rookie state representative, it may have been my first or second term, so I’m in my early twenties in office – and I’m meeting this leader of the Republicans, who’s been in Congress a long time. I was born in ’48; so roughly at the time I was born, he goes there.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 2:17-Cv-14148-ELC-DPH-GJQ ECF No. 268 Filed 04/25/19 Pageid.11559 Page 1 of 146
    Case 2:17-cv-14148-ELC-DPH-GJQ ECF No. 268 filed 04/25/19 PageID.11559 Page 1 of 146 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS ) OF MICHIGAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 2:17-cv-14148 ) JOCELYN BENSON, in her official ) OPINION AND ORDER capacity as Michigan Secretary of ) State, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ___________________________________ ) BEFORE: CLAY, Circuit Judge; HOOD and QUIST, District Judges. CLAY, Circuit Judge. The League of Women Voters of Michigan (“League”), numerous League members (“League Plaintiffs”), and several Democratic voters (“Individual Plaintiffs”) bring suit against Jocelyn Benson, the Michigan Secretary of State in her official capacity, under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, alleging that Michigan’s current legislative apportionment plan (the “Enacted Plan”), which the state legislature implemented as Michigan Public Acts 128 and 129 of 2011, violates Plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment equal protection rights and First Amendment free speech and association rights by deliberately discriminating against Democratic voters.1 (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) After Plaintiffs filed suit, several parties moved to intervene. Ultimately, intervention was granted to several of the Republican members of Michigan’s United States congressional delegation and two Republican state house members (together “Congressional and State House 1 When referring to the League, League Plaintiffs, and Individual Plaintiffs together, the Court uses the term “Plaintiffs.” When referring only to the League Plaintiffs and the Individual Plaintiffs, separate from the League as an organization, the Court uses the term “Voters.” -1- Case 2:17-cv-14148-ELC-DPH-GJQ ECF No. 268 filed 04/25/19 PageID.11560 Page 2 of 146 Intervenors”) (see ECF Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Michigan Political Leaders: Evolving Roles and Early Tests
    Five Michigan Political Leaders: Evolving Roles and Early Tests by Craig Ruff Political leaJership is tested most in periods of change. Political leaders know that events, public opinion, leadership dynamics, and the times affect their roles and actions and test their flexibility and adaptability. The five men who lead Michigan's legislative and executive branches of government are undergoing metamorphoses in response to the political change wrought by voters last fall. They are: John Engler (governor), Dick Posthumus (Senate majority leader), Art Miller (Senate minority leader), Lew Dodak (Speaker of the House), and Paul Hillegonds (House minority leader). Change itself is neither inherently good nor bad, but its consequences may be positive or negative. The consequences of the 1990 elections are being felt just now not only by the general public but by the people invested with political leadership. This Commentary examines the styles of the five leaders, their roles, their interaction, and what the future may bring them. GOVERNOR JOHN ENGLER John Engler won the bully pulpit and political brass ring of Michigan-the governorship. Twenty years L a legislator, a retailer in both chambers of his Republican principles, and a skillful strategist and political organizer, Engler came to the governorship with more battle-tested legislative savvy than any predecessor. Engler's tactical mettle resembles Lyndon Baines Johnson's. LBJ was, and Engler is, the consummate maneuverer/insider/strategist, and he has shown considerable brinkmanship in the current budget crisis. John Engler is not timid. He never has been, even when his arsenal-namely Republican control only of the Senate-was paltry.
    [Show full text]
  • Negligence Law Section: Quarterly Spring/Summer 2002
    STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN Spring/Summer 2002 NEGLIGENCE LAW SECTION Q UARTERLY The Official Newsletter of the State Bar of Michigan Negligence Law Section David R. Getto, Chair Chairperson David R. Getto Sommers, Schwartz, Silver & Schwartz, PC FROM THE CHAIR 2000 Town Center, Suite 900 simply asking one side whether he or she Southfield, MI 48075-1142 liked the outcome. Yet many critics of our Vice-chairperson legal system, such as Mr. Arwady, rely ex- Timothy H. Knecht actly on such anecdotal information when Secretary calling for system “reform.” Third, let us ex- Judith A. Susskind Treasurer amine the features of our legal system that Cynthia E. Merry make it the best system ever devised for fair dispute resolution: Council Peter L. Dunlap • Open and ready access. This encour- Lansing ages individuals, organizations and cor- Lynn M. Foley porations to resolve their differences in a Livonia Barry Goodman David R. Getto civil, non-violent way. Southfield • A settled system of rules all parties Deborah Gordon Recently, the publisher of the Kalamazoo Royal Oak Gazette, George Arwady, published an editorial must follow, thereby placing every- Steven A. Hicks entitled “Don’t Let Your Babies Grow Up To Be one on a level playing field. This in- Lansing Lawyers.” The editorial is a vicious and unjusti- cludes an “umpire” (the judge) who Barbara A. Patek makes sure the rules are followed. No- Detroit fied attack on our noble profession as well as Thomas M. Peters our legal system. Interestingly, Mr. Arwady ac- where else in society do we have this Detroit knowledges a strongly held 20 year bias against except, interestingly, in organized sports Susan Philpott Preketes lawyers and also self-servingly laments the un- and gaming.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor John Engler Portrait Unveiling
    G OVERNOR J OHN E NGLER P ORTRAIT U NVEILING GOVERNOR JOHN ENGLER PORTRAIT UNVEILING Program Introductions Chief Justice Clifford Taylor, Master of Ceremonies Welcome Governor Jennifer Granholm Remarks Lieutenant Governor Connie Binsfeld Lieutenant Governor Dick Posthumus Introduction of Artist Eugene A. Gargaro, Jr. Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Detroit Institute of Arts Comments by the Artist Nelson Shanks Remarks Governor John Engler # # # # # Portrait Unveiling Margaret, Hannah and Madeleine Engler # # # # # Reception The Governor John Mathias Engler was Michigan’s 46th governor. His tenure, from 1991 till 2003, was exceeded by only one chief executive in state history. During his twelve years in office, Michigan’s economy improved dramatically and its public schools experienced far-reaching reform. John Engler was born in Mount Pleasant, Michigan, on October 12, 1948, the son of Agnes and Matt, a Beal City farmer and cattleman. After attending Catholic and public schools, he went to Michigan State University, where he graduated with a degree in agricultural economics. It was in 1970, during his senior year in college, that he first ran for a seat in the state House of Representatives. By dint of smart campaigning and hard work, he beat a powerful incumbent to become the then-youngest member ever elected to the Michigan legislature; he was 22 years old. In 1978, after being elected to the House four times, John Engler challenged and defeated another incumbent in the state Senate, where he served for 12 years and was majority leader from 1984-1990. Attending law school while serving in the Senate, he earned a J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks to a Joint Session of the Michigan
    290 Mar. 6 / Administration of William J. Clinton, 1997 Remarks to a Joint Session of the Governor, you'll get mad at it. [Laughter] Michigan Legislature in Lansing, There were 95 Republicans and 5 Democrats Michigan in the House. And it was the aftermath of March 6, 1997 the Civil War. I say this because our two States have been Thank you. Thank you very much, Mr. entwined in an interesting way over the Speaker, Governor. Thank you all for that course of time. We were allowed together wonderful welcome in this magnificent cap- into the Union because Michigan was a free itol. I'm delighted to be here today with so State and Arkansas was a Southern slave many of your State officialsÐLieutenant State, and Michigan became the partyÐad- Governor Binsfeld; your State board of edu- hering to the party of Abraham Lincoln, of cation president, Kathleen Strauss. I don't freedom, and the party of Theodore Roo- know if Frank Kelley met Theodore Roo- sevelt, which the Governor explained. And sevelt, but he did meet me when I became most of us Democrats are pretty proud of attorney general. [Laughter] And some days those folks, too. They represent the best in I feel about that old. I want to thank the America. mayor of Lansing, Mayor Hollister, for meet- Then, after the Great Depression, Michi- ing me at the airport, and all the other State gan basically became the home of tens of officials and dignitaries who are hereÐRep- thousands of people from my State who sim- resentative Sikkema, thank you, sir; and Sen- ply could not make a living anymore on the ator Cherry and Senator Posthumus.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Campaign Finance Network
    A Citizen’s Guide to Michigan Campaign Finance 2002 N W E $ Michigan Campaign Finance Network The Michigan Campaign Finance Network is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that conducts research and public education on campaign finances in the state of Michigan and the relationsh i p between campaign contributions and election outcomes and matters of public policy. B O A R D O F D I R E C T O R S Bill Bobier Jan Dolan Patricia Donath Patrick Diehl Brian Imus H. Lynn Jondahl John M. Koval John Mayer John J. H. Schwarz Alma Wheeler Smith Richard L. Robinson, executive director © June 2003 by Michigan Campaign Finance Network Data and information may be used for public education with attribution. This report was researched and written by Barbara R. Moorhouse and Richard L. Robinson with David Hogg and Christopher Moorhouse. Document design by Cathy Turley. Cover art includes an 1895 Michigan map. The work of the Michigan Campaign Finance Network is supported by the Joyce Foundation, Alliance for Better Campaigns, Public Campaign and voluntary contributions from concerned Michigan citizens. This project was made possible by the Joyce Foundation. Michigan Campaign Finance Network 1310 Turner Street, Suite B, Lansing, MI 48906 Phone: (517) 482-7198 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mcfn.org A Citizen’s Guide to Michigan Campaign Finance 2002 C o n t e n t s Index of Tables ..............................................................................................................................................2 Introduction....................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Executive Officers
    CONSTITUTIONAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ELECTED OFFICERS (Terms Expire January 1, 2003) Governor JOHN M. ENGLER, Mt. Pleasant Lieutenant Governor RICHARD POSTHUMUS, Alto Secretary of State CANDICE S. MILLER, Lansing Attorney General JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Northville APPOINTED OFFICERS State Treasurer DOUGLAS B. ROBERTS,1 Lansing Superintendent of Public Instruction THOMAS D. WATKINS, JR.,2 Lansing 1 Appointed State Treasurer by Governor John M. Engler, effective May 1, 2001. 2 Appointed Superintendent of Public Instruction by the State Board of Education effective April 30, 2001. 376 CHAPTER IV • THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE JOHN M. ENGLER, GOVERNOR DICK POSTHUMUS, LT. GOVERNOR George W. Romney State Office Building P.O. Box 30013, Lansing, MI 48909 Phone: (517) 373-3400, Fax: (517) 335-6863 Internet Address: [email protected] As Michigan’s chief executive officer, the governor is responsible for making state government more accountable to taxpayers and more effective in meeting the needs of our citizens. The governor sets overall policy direction for the executive branch, appoints most department directors and members of state boards and commissions, recommends the state budget to the legislature, and has numerous other responsibilities outlined by the Constitution of 1963 and state statutes. The Executive Office includes six divisions and support staff that help both the governor and lieutenant governor serve the public, manage state government, develop policy, and implement new initiatives. The Legislative Affairs Division is responsible for working with the legislature to develop and pass bills necessary to implement the governor’s agenda. The State Government Affairs Division works with the departments and interested citizens and groups in developing new policy initiatives and advises the governor regarding a wide range of policy issues.
    [Show full text]