East Coast Main Line Route Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

East Coast Main Line Route Study 01 02 East Coast Foreword We’re pleased to present these Railway We’ve worked with colleagues from Main Investment Choices for the East Coast across the transport industry and also Main Line railway. The ECML, as we call it, the wider infrastructure planning world is a great British railway – at the cutting – with devolved transport bodies, local Line edge of new rail technologies and steeped and combined authorities, and local in tradition. It’s a national asset vital to enterprise partnerships – to shape a range Route Study the economy of the UK, and investing in of railway improvements that support the its growth is the same as investing in that communities and economies along the economy. length of the ECML route. These are choices Railway investment designed to meet the expected growth From small but effective changes to in demand for rail services, and which choices the current network, to large-scale new promote economic growth – we know that developments, the improvements to the the ECML has untapped potential. rail service set out in this study are all designed to facilitate economic growth. It’s a virtuous circle where the ultimate We plan for the long term, and you’ll find beneficiary is the UK. So we’d encourage all large-scale investment options in this those who want to see an improved railway document that can keep the ECML growing to review these choices and find out more to the 2040s and beyond. But in a world about the improvements that benefit them where public money is in short supply, we and the UK. also need to be able to draw on a range of different funding approaches, and target investment in the near term to set us on the right path for long term growth. That’s why the options we’ve developed here are investment choices. Rob McIntosh Managing Director, Network Rail London North East and East Midlands Route King’s Cross Jo Kaye station front Managing Director, System Operator Network Rail June 2018 ECML Railway Investment Choices ECML Railway Investment Choices June 2018 03 04 Exec summary Summary of choices The East Coast Main Line – ECML – is a It is supported by more detailed analysis The strategy for Over the coming years, in addition to the ‘internal’ challenge of providing reliable fast, high yield route connecting London that can be accessed via links in the pages the ECML can be 41% UK infrastructure and timetables in the face of with the North and Scotland. A third of the that follow. summarised as an ever-growing railway, the ECML will have % UK population lives within 20 minutes of an follows: to respond to two main ‘external’ factors that GDP: ECML station; together they produce 41% The options presented range in scope define the investment choices presented in this of the UK’s GDP. 1 This sort of reach and from relatively small changes to current 1. Evaluate demand study. £570bn economic value means that train operators train services, through to proposals for and define options and local stakeholders are keen to increase new, large scale civil infrastructure that to meet it The first is a steady and constant growth in passengers wanting to commute into major journey opportunities and improve journey can enable new services. The key option urban centres by rail. The second is the experience for their customers. Network types are: 2. Respond to a full introduction of high speed rail connections London Suburban Passenger Growth Rail economic forecasts also show that this range of customer between London and the North, with the trend for increased demand on the ECML • making the best use of the current and funder needs advent of HS2 phase 2 from the 2030s. will continue through to the 2040s.2 system through changes to existing The first forms a challenge that will require near- 2012 to 2023 train services; 3. Invest in a safe and term action in order to meet demand. Options • improvements at hub stations along the In parallel with the resilient railway to increase suburban passenger numbers into need for growth • recommendations that show the need route to make the most of the ECML A third of the UK London are presented below. These include links with the wider network, and to allow requirements, the to complete enhancement schemes 4. Consider using long distance services to help with peak better interaction between local and population lives less ECML infrastructure is already in development; affordability; define demand, and options to provide additional mainline services; ageing, and much of it improvements trains on the Hertford and Moorgate suburban is at, or near capacity • near term solutions supporting in steps branches. • a package of major infrastructure than 20 miles from investments that can unlock: (in terms of the number passenger demand and better New forms of digital train control technology an ECML station of trains per hour able journeys through digital train control 5. Apply digital will be key to enabling these additional trains to • a step change in service provision to use it). Investment technology and the provision of more technologies fit on the network while maintaining timetable across the North, linking the trans- and together they is needed to create reliable infrastructure; including train reliability. Pennine route with York, the Tees Valley, a resilient ECML that control Durham and Newcastle; these form On the other hand, the introduction of HS2 produce almost half can grow in line with • longer term infrastructure options part of the Northern Powerhouse Rail presents long-term opportunities. By providing programme of the UK’s GDP the demands of its that can unlock unexploited 6. Remove bottlenecks fast regular travel from London to Leeds, York customers. And the opportunities, new markets and and the constraints and beyond, HS2 will free up significant overall • journey time savings of over range of rail customers provide a step change in service of mixed traffic capacity. That means that the ECML route can 10 minutes between London is growing, with an increasing number levels. be used to drive better connections and more and Scotland. of devolved transport bodies being 7. Enable higher more journey opportunities. Here, the focus will be Also presented for consideration are proposals established to specify rail services and To shape the investment landscape and uniform speeds on identifying how those opportunities can be for new and improved stations that could unlock commission improvements at a local level. provide a strategic direction to guide developed to encourage economic growth. new markets and drive growth in revenue. the rail industry and local investment 8. Broaden funding 1 Office of National Statistics The role of devolved transport bodies will be These sorts of enhancements get to the heart Gross Value Added So it is in response to changing railway community, the ECML Route Study opportunities, important in this respect: Transport for the of the need to align railway improvements with landscape that the ECML Route Study highlights key strategic themes that need including private North, Midlands Connect, and the combined a broader range of funding streams. Whether 2 Link to Network Rail local authorities whose communities use the Market Studies has been developed, in consultation to be addressed on the route. sector it is in the form of housing development with the rail industry and wider ECML all have visions for how best to promote contributions and commercial returns, or The Department for Transport, infrastructure planning stakeholders. Chief among these are the need for resilient transport improvements to shape growth in through devolved government bodies unlocking as part of the 2017 HLOS, has infrastructure that is reliable, and the use their regions. The TfN Strategic Transport the benefits of growth on local economies – published its expectations for Plan identifies East Coast to Scotland Rail passenger growth over the It builds on the Route Studies previously of digital technology to unlock capacity investment in rail needs to evolve as part of period 2019-2024 and beyond. Connectivity as a Strategic Development published as part of the established and improve customer experience. an innovative future that targets increased These forecasts differ from Corridor; this Route Study is an important part productivity and growth. These and other those used for this route study, Long Term Planning Process, but the of the process of planning future infrastructure but also show continuing objective here is to provide a simpler These are components of a wider issues mean that the investment strategy growth in passenger numbers investment along that corridor. published in this Route Study needs to evolve across the whole network summary of investment choices that a strategy that has been developed and reflect developments that affect the throughout the period. The wider range of potential funders and as part of the consultation process. And to support such aspirations, a range rail industry will continue route: for example the progress of HS2 plans; promoters can use to shape how the railway The need for the ECML to respond to of options that promote economic growth to review growth forecasts through better connections are presented in development of local and regional rail services; and incorporate revised data supports their growth objectives. growth and demand for improvements the NPR Strategic Outline Business Case; and into the strategic planning the study: processes. This document provides a ‘menu’ of has been considered in the light of the the investment priorities in the TfN Strategic enhancement options that have a strategic constraints of the current rail network. • fast suburban services that exploit the Transport Plan. These will all impact on the 3 Click for more information fit with the national network, and can Then, by applying the strategy, a range of speed of the ECML to link people to jobs future choices that funders face.
Recommended publications
  • Railfuture Response to Consultations on the Proposed East Coast Main Line Timetable May 2022
    RAILFUTURE RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS ON THE PROPOSED EAST COAST MAIN LINE TIMETABLE MAY 2022 From: Railfuture Passenger Group & Branches: East Anglia, East Midlands, Lincolnshire, London & South East, North East, North West, Yorkshire & Scotland Submitted to: CrossCountry, Great Northern/Thameslink, LNER, Northern, TransPennine Express Copied to: East Midlands Railway, First East Coast Trains, Grand Central, Hull Trains, Network Rail & ScotRail Index Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 2 Strategic Interventions .................................................................................................................................. 3 LNER ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Responses to LNER Questionnaire ............................................................................................ 6 TransPennine Express .................................................................................................................................. 9 CrossCountry ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • XCTL-1001 Passenger Information During Disruption Local Plan
    XCTL-1001 Passenger Information During Disruption Local Plan Synopsis This document demonstrates the process and procedures in place within CrossCountry to comply with the ATOC Code of Practice for providing Passenger Information During Disruption (PIDD). Published by UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN PRINTED Safety Team CrossCountry 5th Floor, Cannon House 18 Priory Queensway © 2016 XCTL Birmingham B4 6BS Contents A Administration ............................................................................................................. 3 B Requirements .............................................................................................................. 4 1. Purpose & Scope ........................................................................................... 4 2. People ........................................................................................................... 4 C Procedure .................................................................................................................... 5 1. Background .................................................................................................... 5 2. Aims and Objectives of PIDD ......................................................................... 5 3. Interface with Network Rail and Other Organisations ..................................... 5 4. Compliance .................................................................................................... 6 5. Key Requirements ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Profile 2020 Warrington
    Borough profile 2020 Warrington 6 4 3 117 122 118 115 9 5 19 120 7 Warrington Wards 2 13 1 1. Appleton 12. Latchford West 110 11 12 2. Bewsey & Whitecross 13. Lymm North & Thelwall 1 14 3. Birchwood 14. Lymm South 4. Burtonwood & Winwick 15. Orford 116 21 5. Chapelford & Old Hall 16. Penketh & Cuerdley 8 6. Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 17. Poplars & Hulme 7. Fairfield & Howley 18. Poulton North 8. Grappenhall 19. Poulton South 1 9. Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall 20. Rixton & Woolston 10. Great Sankey South 21. Stockton Heath 11. Latchford East 22. Westbrook Produced by Business Intelligence Service Back to top Contents 1. Population of Warrington 2. Deprivation 3. Education - Free School Meals (FSM) 4. Education - Special Educational Needs (SEN) 5. Education - Black Minority Ethnic (BME) 6. Education - English as an Additional Language (EAL) 7. Education - (Early Years aged 4/5) - Early Years Foundation Stage: Good Level of Development (GLD) 8. Education - (End of primary school aged 10/11) – Key Stage 2: Reading, Writing and Maths 9. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Progress 8 10. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Attainment 8 11. Health - Life expectancy 12. Health - Low Birthweight 13. Health - Smoking at time of delivery 14. Health - Overweight and obese reception children 15. Health - Overweight and obese Year 6 children 16. Children’s Social Care – Children in Need 17. Adult Social Care – Request for Support from new clients 18. Adult Social Care – Sequel to the Requests for Support 19. Adult Social Care – Number of clients accessing Long Term Support 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Maintenance Code
    Property Maintenance Code City of York, Pennsylvania UPDATED OCTOBER 2015 C. Kim Bracey, Mayor Property Maintenance Code of the City of York, Pennsylvania As adopted by the Council of the City of York, Pennsylvania Session 2000 COPYRIGHT © 1998 BY INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, INC. All rights reserved. Chapters 1 through 8, inclusive, of the Property Maintenance Code of the City of York designate and incorporate portions of the ICC International Property Maintenance Code, 1998 edition, a copyrighted work owned by the INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, INC. Without advance written permission from the copyright owner, no part of this book may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including, without limitation, electronic, optical, or mechanical means (by way of example, and not limitation, photocopying, or recording by or in an information storage and retrieval system). The CITY OF YORK edition of this copyrighted work is by arrangement with BOCA International, Inc. For information on permission to copy material exceeding fair use, please contact: Chief Executive Officer, BOCA International, Inc., 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, Illinois 60478, (708) 799-2300. AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONS COPYRIGHT © 2000 BY THE CITY OF YORK, PENNSYLVANIA All rights reserved. No amendments or additions made by the City of York, Pennsylvania to the ICC International Property Maintenance Code, 1998 edition, as reproduced in this book, may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by an information storage and retrieval system without advance permission in writing from the City of York, Pennsylvania. For information, address: City of York, Bureau of Permits, Planning and Zoning, 101 South George Street, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of York Home Rule Charter
    TOWN OF YORK HOME RULE CHARTER Adopted November 5, 1991 Amended November 7, 1995 Amended November 4, 1997 Amended November 2, 1999 Amended November 6, 2001 Amended November 4, 2003 Amended November 8, 2005 Amended May 20, 2006 Amended November 7, 2006 Amended May 18, 2013 Amended July 14, 2020 York Home Rule Charter INDEX TOWN OF YORK HOME RULE CHARTER Page ARTICLE 1: GRANTS OF POWERS TO THE TOWN...................... 1 Section 1: Incorporation........................................................................... 1 Section 2: Form of Government.............................................................. 1 Section 3: Construction............................................................................ 1 Section 4: Intergovernmental Relations.................................................. 1 Section 5: Short Title................................................................................. 1 ARTICLE II. TOWN MEETINGS......................................................... 2 Section 1: The Legislative Body.............................................................. 2 Section 2: Town Meeting Referenda Elections....................................... 2 Section 3: Fiscal Year................................................................................ 3 Section 4: Budget Committee................................................................. 3 Section 5: Submission of School Budget and Message.......................... 4 Section 6: Submission of Municipal Budget and Message................... 4 Section 7: Municipal
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Modern a Route for Train Simulator – Dovetail Games
    www.creativerail.co.uk East Coast Modern A Route for Train Simulator – Dovetail Games Contents A Brief History of the Route Route Requirements Scenarios Belmont Yard – York Freight Doncaster – Newark Freight Grantham – Doncaster Non-Stop Hexthorpe – Marshgate Freight Newark – Doncaster Works Peterborough – Tallington Freight Peterborough – York Non-Stop Selby – York York – Doncaster Works Operating Notices Acknowledgements © Copyright CreativeRail. All rights reserved. 2018. www.creativerail.co.uk A Brief History of the Route The first incarnation of the East Coast Main Line dates back to 1850 when London to Edinburgh services became possible on the completion of a permanent bridge over the River Tweed. However, the route was anything but direct, would have taken many, many hours and would have been exhausting. By 1852, the Great Northern Railway had completed the 'Towns Line' between Werrington (Peterborough) and Retford, which saw journey times between York and London of five hours. Edinburgh to London was a daunting eleven. Over time, the route has endured harsh periods, not helped by two world wars. It only benefited from very little improvement. Nevertheless, journey times did shrink. Names and companies synonymous with the route, such as, LNER and Gresley have secured their place in history, along with the most famous service - 'The Flying Scotsman'. Motive power also developed with an ever increasing calibre including A3s, A4s Class 55s and HSTs that have powered expresses through the decades. The introduction of HST services in 1978 saw the Flying Scotsman reach Edinburgh in only five hours. A combination of remodelling, track improvements and full electrification has seen a further reduction to what it is today, which sees the Scotsman complete the 393 miles in under four and a half hours in the capable hands of Class 91 and Mk4 IC225 formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoke-On-Trent Group Travel Guide
    GROUP GUIDE 2020 STOKE-ON-TRENT THE POTTERIES | HERITAGE | SHOPPING | GARDENS & HOUSES | LEISURE & ENTERTAINMENT 1 Car park Coach park Toilets Wheelchair accessible toilet Overseas delivery Refreshments Stoke for Groups A4 Advert 2019 ART.qxp_Layout 1 02/10/2019 13:20 Page 1 Great grounds for groups to visit There’s something here to please every group. Gentle strolls around award-winning gardens, woodland and lakeside walks, a fairy trail, adventure play, boat trips and even a Monkey Forest! Inspirational shopping within 77 timber lodges at Trentham Shopping Village, the impressive Trentham Garden Centre and an array of cafés and restaurants offering food to suit all tastes. There’s ample free coach parking, free entrance to the Gardens for group organisers and a £5 meal voucher for coach drivers who accompany groups of 12 or more. Add Trentham Gardens to your days out itinerary, or visit the Shopping Village as a fantastic alternative to motorway stops. Contact us now for your free group pack. JUST 5 MINS FROM J15 M6 Stone Road, Trentham, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire 5 minutes from J15 M6, Sat Nav Post Code ST4 8JG Call 01782 646646 Email [email protected] www.trentham.co.uk Stoke for Groups A4 Advert 2019 ART.qxp_Layout 1 02/10/2019 13:20 Page 1 Welcome Contents Introduction 4 WELCOME TO OUR Pottery Museum’s 5 & Visitor Centres Factory Tours 8 CREATIVE CITY Have A Go 9 Opportunities Manchester Stoke-on-Trent Pottery Factory 10 Great grounds BirminghamStoke-on-Trent Shopping General Shopping 13 Welcome London Stoke-on-Trent is a unique city affectionately known Gardens & Historic 14 for groups to visit as The Potteries.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6 Performance Indicator and CIPFA Data Comparisons BVPI Comparisons
    Appendix 6 Performance Indicator and CIPFA Data Comparisons BVPI Comparisons Southend-on-Sea vs CPA Environment High Scorers / Nearest Neighbours / Unitaries BV 106: Percentage of new homes built on previously developed land 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea 100 100 100 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 56.8 63 n/a Bournemouth 94 99 n/a Derby 51 63 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire 24.08 16.64 n/a Halton 27.48 49 n/a Hartlepool 40.8 56 n/a Isle of Wight 84 86 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull 40 36 n/a Luton 99 99.01 n/a Middlesbrough 74.3 61 n/a Nottingham 97 99 n/a Peterborough 79.24 93.66 n/a Plymouth 81.3 94.4 n/a South Gloucestershire 41 44.6 n/a Stockton-on-Tees 33 29.34 n/a Stoke-on-Trent 58.4 61 n/a Telford & Wrekin 54 55.35 n/a Torbay 39 58.57 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 56.8 63 n/a Bournemouth 94 99 n/a Brighton & Hove 99.7 100 n/a Isle of Wight 84 86 n/a Portsmouth 98.6 100 n/a Torbay 39 58.57 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 94 93.7 n/a Unitary Median 70 65 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 41 52.3 n/a Average 66.3 68.7 n/a Source: ODPM website BV 107: Planning cost per head of population.
    [Show full text]
  • Peterborough City Council Orangetek - ARIALED with Telensa CMS
    ARIALED Peterborough City Council OrangeTek - ARIALED with Telensa CMS November 2014 “This was a great opportunity to show case the benefits of LED Lighting – Improving lighting levels, Reducing Energy Cost and Emissions, whilst improving the city Landscape for Residents. OrangeTek LED Luminaires perform exceptionally well, meeting Lighting design needs and offer personalised solutions and services that they truly deliver on their commitments.” Steve Biggs IEng MILP Senior Engineer/Technical Lead at Skanska UK November 2014 Peterborough City Council Anticipate Savings of more than £1.2 million per Annum Peterborough City Council Residential and Traffic Route Lighting. installed by Skanska ARIALED by OrangeTek In excess of 7,000 units installed in the past 2 Yrs. Project Details Projected Savings Peterborough, have installed just over 7,000 Orangetek The programme is due to be completed by February LED luminaires in the last two years of a total inventory 2016. of street lights being 33,000 units. Once complete, the new lamps will help the council cut Nearly 85% of Orangetek LED luminaries installed are on the city's street lighting bill by at least 57 per cent and residential roads, initially the older TERRALED model help reduce carbon emissions by more than 5,300 tons containing 24 & 36 LEDs. In March 2013 the TERRALED per Annum. installation ceased and replaced on the contract with the more efficient ARIALED, containing 20 or 30 LEDs, Street lighting costs the city council £2 million each replacing the 35W SOX, 50W SON luminaries. year. Based on estimated savings of about £1.2 million per year, the street lamp replacement is expected to Average savings are close to 50% without the utilisation pay for itself in just over 10 years (total cost of new of their CMS system (Telensa CMS).
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity on North-South Main Lines
    Capacity on North-South Main Lines Technical Report Report October 2013 Prepared for: Prepared by: Department for Transport Steer Davies Gleave Click here to enter text. 28-32 Upper Ground London SE1 9PD +44 (0)20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Technical Report CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... I 1 CREATING THE TIMETABLES THAT DETERMINE CAPACITY PROVISION IS A COMPLEX ISSUE .................................................................................................. 1 2 EUROPEAN COMPARISONS ........................................................................ 5 3 HOW CAPACITY CAN BE MEASURED ............................................................ 7 4 TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES ..................................................................... 9 5 CAPACITY AND THE NORTH-SOUTH ROUTES ................................................ 11 West Coast Main Line .............................................................................. 11 Midland Main Line .................................................................................. 13 East Coast Main Line ............................................................................... 14 Route section categorisation: green/orange/red ............................................ 15 FIGURES Figure 5.1 Assessed post-2019 Capacity Pressures on North-South Main Lines 19 Contents Technical Report Summary 1. This note assesses the capacity of the North-South Rail Lines in the UK from the perspective
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Study Association Program
    The Hagestad Sandhouse Rail group presents….a Special Sandhouse Event Wednesday – Sept. 16, 2015 - 1:00 pm – 4:30 pm (followed by informal networking reception) Location: NU Transportation Center, Chambers Hall, 600 Foster, Evanston On Wednesday, Sept. 16, 2015, the Northwestern Transportation Center will host members of the Railway Study Association (RSA) - a group of British Railway and rail transit officers, suppliers, related professionals and academics associated with the London School of Economics - who will be visiting Chicago for a week long Study tour arranged by Michael Weinman (PTSI Transportation) – a fellow Sandhouse member. Sandhouse members are invited to join some or all of the presentations. RSVPs requested to: [email protected] British Rail / Sandhouse Program: 1:00 pm “ Railroad Safety in the United States” Professor Ian Savage, Associate Chair & Distinguished Senior Lecturer, Department of Economics, Northwestern University The presentation will look at the different types of contemporary safety challenges facing U.S. railroads and recent trends in the risks to employees, motorists at grade crossings, pedestrians and bystanders. It will also present some cross-modal risk comparisons. 1:45 pm “The Expansion of Intercity Bus Service in the United States and the Changing Dynamics of Bus/Rail Competition” - Joseph P. Schwieterman, Director Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, and Professor, School for Public Service, De Paul University Schwieterman will discuss the recent revival of intercity bus service in the U.S. and how this is changing the competitive mix of services that are available. He will draw upon his analysis to show how the amount of service has grown since 2008 and illustrate the growing investments in express services between cities separated by 100 - 350 miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    High-Speed Rail Development Programme 2008/9 Principal Consultant Final Report 9 October 2009 Version 5.7 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 The Study 4 1.2 Study Approach 5 1.3 The Guiding Principles for High Speed Rail Development 8 2 Corridor Status Report 10 2.1 Overview of Corridors 10 2.2 Passenger Travel Market 11 2.3 Rail Infrastructure and Services in the 5 Corridors 13 2.4 Planning Issues/Objectives 21 2.5 Findings from regional workshops 22 2.6 Core objectives for high speed rail 23 3 Network Scenarios: Initial Network Testing 24 3.1 Objective of Initial Network Testing 24 3.2 Strategic Choices and Design Criteria 24 3.3 Conclusions from the Initial Network Scenarios 30 4 Issues addressed by Corridor and Network Studies 36 4.1 Building on the initial network scenario study 36 4.2 Utilising other evidence 36 4.3 Costs of Routes to Scotland 36 4.4 Serving the second corridor north from London 37 4.5 London linkages 37 4.6 Serving South Wales and the South West 38 4.7 Transpennine 38 4.8 Scenario development 38 5 Scenarios Tested 39 5.1 Overview 39 5.2 Scenario Tests 39 5.3 Infrastructure 40 5.4 HS Service Patterns 41 5.5 Changes to Classic Services 42 6 Evaluation of Scenarios 44 6.1 Introduction 44 6.2 Evaluation criteria 44 6.3 High Speed line from London/Heathrow/HS-CT to Birmingham and Manchester 46 Page 2 of 80 6.4 High Speed line from London/ HS-CT to Sheffield/Leeds (via M11) 47 6.5 HS-NW extended to Scotland 49 6.6 Scenario 4: Incremental benefit of Heathrow link 51 6.7 Value of HS-NE to Newcastle (M1 corridor) 53 6.8 How
    [Show full text]