ASIAN EXCHANGE Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ASIAN EXCHANGE Vol ( t f1)~~ffm ®ill®llilf1)UO~JB ~ Vol. 20, No. 2, 2004Nol. 21 No. 1, 2005 ;;!- The Asian Regional Exchange for New Alternatives (ARENA) is a :a regional network of concerned Asian scholars and activists which aims -V\ -z: to contribute to processes of meaningful and people-oriented social ~ change. Noting the new global climate of insecurity that has been· V\ ushered in by the escalation of war and militarism, ARENA has ;;: MILITARISING ...... embarked on a new multi-pronged peace programme that seeks to : ...1"1"'1 . V\ • change the conception of security from national security towards a 0 I""\ STATE, SOCIETY more people-friendly paradigm in protection of people's rights, 1"1"'1- ..... livelihoods and security; < and • show how militarised notions of security contribute to and ::.:::-z: CULTURE inA influence security arising from peoples and states; and c I""\ • introduce alternative approaches arising from people's perspectives. c !:i c ARENA believes that the current crisis of 'security' has given rise to a .. :a political moment which calls for an alternative vision and agenda for 1"1"'1 peace. In this spirit, ARENA hopes to articulate a 'social critique' that -z: inspires new visions and political imagination. ::.:::-V\ -••::.:::- :aI""\ --t -I""\ ::.:::-~ ""'C:J 1"1"'1 :aV\ ""'C:J !l1"1"'1 <- 1"1"'1V\ Militarising State, Society and Culture in Asia: Critical Perspectives Asian Regional Exchange for New Alternatives (ARENA) HoNG KoNG • 2005 ASIAN EXCHANGE Vol. 20, No.2, 2004/Vol. 21, No. l, 2005 ISSN 0256-7520 Asian Exchange is published twice a year by the Asian Regional Exchange for New Alternatives (ARENA) Flat 6, 13th Floor, Block A, Fuk Keung Industrial Building 66-68 Tong Mi Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong Phone: (852) 2805 6193/6270; Fax: (852) 2504 2986 e-mail: [email protected] Website: http://WW'.v.arenaonline.org Opinions expressed in Asian Exchange do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of ARENA Reproduction of material appearing in this publication and the listing of resources in other publications should be acknowledged -EDITORIAL---- - ----COMMITTEE- -- MELANI BUDIANTA TEMARIO RIVERA Indonesia Japan LAUKINCHI )OHAN SARAVANAMUTTU Hong Kong Malaysia AIDA)EANNMANIPON HARSH SETHI ARENA Coordinator, Hong Kong India KINHIDEMUSHAKO)I MEENA SHIVDAS Japan United Kingdom VINODRAINA )AYADEVA UYANGODA Chair, ARENA Council of Fellows Sri Lanka Guest Editor )AYADEVA UYANGODA Issue Managing Editor AN) ANI ABELLA Cover Design & Layout TONY MANIPON Printed by Clear-cut Publishing & Printing Co. Bl, 15/F, Block B, Fortune Factory Building 40 lee Chung St, Chai Wan, Hong Kong ------------SUBSCRIPTION RATES Annual Subscn'ption including postage JAPAN, AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND: US$35 REST OF ASIA: US$25 AFRICA, LATIN AMERICA: US$25 US & EUROPE: US$40 HONG KONG: I-IK$200 Cheques should be drawn in favour of ASIAN REGIONAL EXCHANGE FOR NEW ALTERNATIVES LTD Foreword THis SPECIAL ISSUE of Asian Exchange was at its final stage of editing when the monster tsunami of December 26, 2004 swept the coastlines of Southern Asia. Sitting in Hong Kong, it occurred to the ARENA Secretariat, for a split second, that production for this book would inevitably be delayed. But that was the least of our concerns. Most pressing was the tsunami's impact and what it might mean for the entire region. For in its wake, the tsunami claimed victims from at least forty ( 40) countries, left behind more than 150,000 people dead, thousands more missing or fighting for their lives in hospitals and make shift clinics, hundreds of thousands more without homes and livelihood, and millions all in all affected by the damages it wrought on food, water and health systems. The emotional shock the tsunami caused nearly equaled its physical impact. Its social, economic and political repercussions, particularly in terms of mobilizing assistance to its victims, trauma healing, and post-disaster reconstruction immediately became the focus of worldwide attention. Amid the images of horror, grief, pain and suffering, the watershed of solidarity gestures and donations that poured in from ordinary people from different parts of the world, especially from the disaster-hit countries themselves, was remarkable and heartwarming. However, there echoed a growing concern over the possible politicization of the international cmnmunity's <hmnanitariad response, the prospects for a Ill stronger presence of the world's most powerful nations that this new emergency situation might bring to the region, and even more specifically, over the possibility of an increased role of the military in humanitarian assistance. It was against this intense backdrop that Jayadeva Uyangoda managed to complete the editing of this book from Colombo, and to note in his introduction some of the new issues and sources of anxiety that arose from the emergency situation: "The deployment of the us marines in Asia's tsunami-hit countries for 'humanitarian tasks' places this dimension of militarisation in another new global context. As the American officials have openly admitted, this 'humanitarian assistance' is immediately prompted by the Bush administration's considerations of global security against terrorism." Indeed, reeling from the failures that were unraveling in its war on Iraq, the Bush administration soon saw in the tsunami crisis a golden opportunity for the us to demonstrate its 'humanitarian motives: And yet no less than Colin Powell, us Secretary of State, hinted that us initiatives to assist tsunami­ hit nations was part of its effort to win the 'war on terror', remarking that "it does give the Moslem world and the rest of the world, an opportunity to see American generosity, American values in action." Clearly, international humanitarian assistance could not escape its immediate political context of war and a militarized global climate. Or perhaps one might even say that the forces of war and militarism, if left unchecked, would surely find a way to manifest themselves in other forms, even in the gravest situation of natural calamity. It should firstly be pointed out that worldwide mobilization for tsunami­ related assistance has been taking place within a global setting of intense debates around the us-led war on terror and the effects and implications of us militarist designs and policies. And secondly, it must be remembered that many of the countries hit by the tsunami had been experiencing militarisation and politico-ethnic conflicts for some time, like Sri Lanka and Indonesia, where the Aceh province was the worst hit by the disaster. Others are sites of simmering conflicts such as Thailand and India. In Indonesia, civil society groups called attention to the fact that counterinsurgency and military operations continued in Aceh, even as its people struggled to survive the calamitous effects of the tsunami. There in Aceh, where the Indonesian military is said to have mimicked the language of the war on terror, soon arose the fear that relief efforts would be caught in the web of us-Indonesia tV political agenda and thus be compromised at the expense of the people who needed assistance the most. What happens when a natural disaster like this tsunami wreaks havoc on the lives of people and communities who for many years had already been suffering from the impact and consequences of militarisation or living through a protracted ethno-political civil war ? Will the urgent and immeasurable task of relief and reconstruction inspire all parties in conflict to advance efforts for peace, as many in Sri Lanka and Indonesia were hoping ? Will this new emergency situation provide another pretext for greater military activities and operations in local communities, or pave the way for greater intervention or presence of the us in the region, as many began to fear ? Any current discussion on emerging challenges to security, and more precisely human security in the region, cannot now proceed without perhaps including in its immediate agenda these new concerns. This special issue of ARENA's Asian Exchange does not provide answers to such questions- indeed all these questions demand further research and discussion and will perhaps require an entirely separate volume. However, what "Militarising State, Society and Culture" does is call our attention to the processes of militarisation and the growing militarism that characterize the landscape of our countries, and which are part of the reality and larger social context within which current engagements of the international community with the region are framed. For ARENA, the '9/]]' tragedy that hit the us in 2001, the 'war on terror' that was subsequently unveiled by the Bush administration in 2002, and the war on Iraq that was launched by the us and its allies in 2003, had all presented a new global context for further analyzing the militarisation of our societies and the resurgence of militarist ideology, culture and practices in the region. Believing that such analysis is not onlytimelybut essential to the development of alternative paradigms of security, the ARENA programme team on War, Militarism and Peace initiated a book project whose final product is this special issue of the ARENA journal. This volume compiles studies of ten (I 0) countries in Asia- India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Philippines, South Korea, Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan and Thailand. It aims to contribute to a broad understanding of militarisation as a physical and ideological phenomenon, illustrate the extent of militarisation in state, government and civil society, and argue how militarised notions of security add to the insecurity of peoples and state. As do all ARENA publications, this volume seeks not only to v encourage debate and critical scholarship around Asian issues but also to inspire and generate responsible and creative responses such that they would open up what editor Uyangoda calls 'possibilities for transformative political practice.' Analyzing the Asian context, the writers in this volume explored and sought to illustrate the linkages between militarisation and militarist nationalism, patriarchy, and right wing ideologies and fundamentalisms, looking at the role of both state and non-state actors.
Recommended publications
  • 1988 Crisis: Salleh Shot Himself in the Foot? Malaysiakini.Com Apr 23, 2008 P Suppiah
    1988 crisis: Salleh shot himself in the foot? Malaysiakini.com Apr 23, 2008 P Suppiah The personalities involved in the entire episode are as follows: * The then Yang Di Pertuan Agong (the King), now the Sultan of Johor * Tun Salleh Abas, who was then the Lord President * The prime minister (Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who was then Datuk Seri Dr), * The then attorney-general, Tan Sri Abu Talib Othman, now Suhakam chief. The whole episode started with Salleh writing a letter to the King dated March 26, 1988, copies of which were sent to the Malay rulers. On May 27, 1988 the prime minister in the presence of high-ranking government officials informed Salleh that the King wished him to step down (to retire as Lord President) because of the said letter. Salleh on May 28, 1988 sent a letter of resignation: the next day he withdrew it and subsequently held a press conference. On June 9, 1988 the prime minister made a second representation to the King alleging further misconduct on the part of Salleh based on his undignified use of the press to vent his grievances – such as requesting for a public hearing of the tribunal and asking for persons of high judicial standing to sit on the tribunal. On June 11, 1988, members of the tribunal were appointed pursuant to the Federal Constitution by the King. On June 14, 1988, Salleh was served with the list of charges against him. On June 17, 1988, Salleh was served with a set of rules to govern the tribunal procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • I. the Royal Malaysia Police
    HUMAN RIGHTS “No Answers, No Apology” Police Abuses and Accountability in Malaysia WATCH “No Answers, No Apology” Police Abuses and Accountability in Malaysia Copyright © 2014 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-1173 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org APRIL 2014 ISBN: 978-1-62313-1173 “No Answers, No Apology” Police Abuses and Accountability in Malaysia Glossary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Map of Malaysia .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ong Boon Hua @ Chin Peng & Anor V. Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negri
    The Malaysian Bar Ong Boon Hua @ Chin Peng & Anor v. Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negri, Malaysia & Ors 2008 [CA] Friday, 20 June 2008 09:11PM ONG BOON HUA @ CHIN PENG & ANOR V. MENTERI HAL EHWAL DALAM NEGERI, MALAYSIA & ORS COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA [CIVIL APPEAL NO: W-01-87-2007] LOW HOP BING JCA; ABDUL MALIK ISHAK JCA; SULAIMAN DAUD JCA 15 MAY 2008 JUDGMENT Abdul Malik Ishak JCA: The Background Facts 1. Cessation of armed activities between the Government of Malaysia and the Communist Party of Malaya was a welcome news for all Malaysians. It became a reality on 2 December 1989. On that date, an agreement was entered between the Government of Malaysia (the fourth respondent/defendant) and the Communist Party of Malaya (the second appellant/applicant) to terminate armed hostilities between the parties (hereinafter referred to as the "agreement"). With the signing of the agreement, armed hostilities between the parties ended and peace prevailed. The terms of the agreement can be seen at p. 235 of the appeal record at Jilid 1 (hereinafter referred to as "ARJ1"). There were four articles to that agreement and the relevant ones read as follows: Article 3 - Residence In Malaysia 3.1 Members of the Communist Party of Malaya and members of its disbanded armed units, who are of Malaysian origin and who wish to settle down in Malaysia, shall be allowed to do so in accordance with the laws of Malaysia. 3.2 Members of the Communist Party of Malaya and members of its disbanded armed units, who are not of Malaysian origin, may be allowed to settle down in MALAYSIA in accordance with the laws of MALAYSIA, if they so desire.
    [Show full text]
  • A/Hrc/32/Ni/5
    联 合 国 A/HRC/32/NI/5 Distr.: General 大 会 10 June 2016 Chinese Original: English 人权理事会 第三十二届会议 议程项目 6 普遍定期审议况 马来西亚人权委员会提交的书面材料 秘书处的说明 人权理事会秘书处根据理事会第 5/1 号决议附件所载议事规则第 7 条(b)项的 规定,谨此转交下文所附马来西亚人权委员会提交的来文。** 根据该条规定, 国家人权机构的参与须遵循人权委员会议定的安排和惯例,包括 2005 年 4 月 20 日第 2005/74 号决议。 具有促进和保护人权国家机构国际协调委员会赋予的“A 类”认可地位的国家人权机构。 ** 附件不译,原文照发。 GE.16-09511 (C) 130616 130616 A/HRC/32/NI/5 Annex [English only] Contents Page I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Status of Implementation of the 150 Recommendations Accepted by Malaysia ............................. 4 2.1 International Obligations ....................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Civil and Political Rights ....................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ................................................................................... 8 2.4 Vulnerable/Marginalised Groups ............................................................................................. 11 2.5 National Mechanisms on Human Rights ............................................................................... 16 2.6 Trafficking in Persons .............................................................................................................. 17 2.7 National Unity ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Court Allows Attorney-General to Lead Prosecution Team
    08 FEB 1999 Court-Anwar (Attorney-General) COURT ALLOWS ATTORNEY-GENERAL TO LEAD PROSECUTION TEAM KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 8 (Bernama) -- Attorney-General Tan Sri Mohtar Abdullah was today allowed by the High Court here to lead the prosecution team in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's corruption trial which has entered the defence stage. Justice Datuk S. Augustine Paul, in his ruling, said in law, the attorney-general could conduct any case and no court could question his exercise of discretion to conduct cases. He made the ruling after Anwar's leading counsel Raja Aziz Addruse objected to Mohtar's appearence together with six others including Senior Deputy Public Prosecutors Datuk Abdul Gani Patail and Azahar Mohamed. Mohtar was one of the witnesses listed and offered to the defence together with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Tun Daim Zainuddin dan Datuk Seri Megat Junid Megat Ayob. The attorney-general, who was not required by the defence as its witness, arrived at the courtroom at 8.45am. When the court sat at 9am, he informed the court that he, as the attorney-general, would lead the prosecution team at that stage. It was Mohtar's second appearence in the trial. On Nov 30, last year, he led the prosecution team in the contempt proceedings against Zainur Zakaria, one of Anwar's nine lawyers. Anwar, 51, who was dismissed from the Cabinet on Sept 2, last year, entered his defence on four charges of corrupt practice on the 51st day of trial today. He was ordered to enter his defence on charges of using his position to interfere in police investigations into allegations of sexual misconduct against him.
    [Show full text]
  • Anwar Confided with Igp on His Differences with Pm, Court Told
    10 FEB 1999 Court-Anwar (Meeting) ANWAR CONFIDED WITH IGP ON HIS DIFFERENCES WITH PM, COURT TOLD KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 10 (Bernama) -- Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim told the High Court here today that he had confided with the then Inspector-General of Police, Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Noor, on the "major political differences" between him and the prime minister. He described the meeting, held sometime in early August last year, as "very critical" and that he was "very frank and open" in his discussion with Rahim. "That meeting to my mind was very critical because after sometime I was very frank and open with him. I said yes, I do have major political diferences with the PM," he said. Anwar was making his defence on four counts of corrupt practice that he used his position as deputy prime minister and finance minister to interfere in police investigations into allegations of sexual misconduct against him. Today is the third day of his testimony under oath on the 53rd day of the trial before Justice Datuk S. Augustine Paul. Anwar, 51, was dismissed from his cabinet posts on Sept 2 last year. To a question by his leading counsel, Raja Aziz Addruse, Anwar said he made the admission when he was alone with Rahim in his office in the Prime Minister's Department. Deputy IGP Tan Sri Norian Mai and CID Director Datuk Yaakub Amin had earlier left the meeting, the second he had held with Rahim and senior police offices regarding the case, Anwar said. The first meeting took place in June at his official residence, also attended by Norian and two other officers.
    [Show full text]
  • ARE WE ASHAMED of IPOH’S GLORIOUS PAST? by Jerry Francis “City That Tin Built” – About Sums up the History of Ipoh and Its Heritage
    www.ipohecho.com.my JUNE 1 DEADLINE If you want to continue receiving the Ipoh Echo every fortnight with your daily newspaper, please IPOH inform your newsvendor. echoYour Voice In The Community See box on the right. echo May 16-31, 2010 PP 14252/10/2010(025567) FREE COPY ISSUE 97 rom 1st June please inform your news vendor to deliver the >> Pg 3 >> Pg 4 FIpoh Echo every fortnight if you wish to continue receiving your community paper. We are still a free paper. To help us defray PROTECTING THE LET’S NOT REMAIN INNOCENTS our distribution costs, we’re asking you, dear reader, to pay your A BACKWATER news vendor 30¢ per issue for delivery, i.e., a cost of 60¢ per month. A small sum for you to keep up with the latest news and information of your Ipoh community. Thank you for your continuing support of the Ipoh Echo – Your Voice of the Ipoh Community. ARE WE ASHAMED OF IPOH’S GLORIOUS PAST? By Jerry Francis “City That Tin Built” – about sums up the history of Ipoh and its heritage. These four words are also an effective slogan to promote the city. Not “Bougainvillea City” or by any other slogans. On May 27 Ipoh will celebrate its 22nd anniversary as a city. But it is sad that through all those years nothing seems to have been done to reflect its glorious past as the centre of the tin mining industry which had been so significant in the economic development of the country. The tin mining industry has since collapsed; the history of the city will also slowly fade away and be forgotten.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 February 2010)
    0903346 [2010] RRTA 41 (5 February 2010) DECISION RECORD RRT CASE NUMBER: 0903346 DIAC REFERENCE(S): CLF2009/29876 COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Malaysia TRIBUNAL MEMBER: Rosa Gagliardi DATE: 5 February 2010 PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne DECISION: The Tribunal remits the matter for reconsideration with the direction that the applicant satisfies s.36(2)(a) of the Migration Act, being a person to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention. STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship to refuse to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). 2. The applicant, who claims to be a citizen of Malaysia arrived in Australia [in] February 2009 and applied to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship for a Protection (Class XA) visa [in] March 2009. The delegate decided to refuse to grant the visa [in] April 2009 and notified the applicant of the decision and her review rights by letter dated [in] April 2009. 3. The delegate refused the visa application on the basis that it was considered that the applicant is not a person to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention. 4. The applicant applied to the Tribunal [in] May 2009 for review of the delegate’s decision. 5. The Tribunal finds that the delegate’s decision is an RRT-reviewable decision under s.411(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal finds that the applicant has made a valid application for review under s.412 of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates
    Volume IV Tuesday No. 8 26th June, 1962 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DEWAN RA'AYAT (HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES) OFFICIAL REPORT CONTENTS ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS [Col. 8591 "Living Wage" Legislation [Col. 9411 MOTIONS: Establishment of Dock Labour Board, Penana (Withdrawal of Motion) [Col. 9461 The Development (Supplementary) (No. 1) Estimatet1, 1962 !CoL 8621 Kilang Baja Urea Dan Kertas <Meoarek Balek UsoD Head 101 [Col. 8821 [Col. 9471 Head 103 !Col. 8831 Daily-Rated System of Wages (Abolition) [Col. 9471 Heads 1415 and 109 [Col. 8861 Head 114 !Col. 8901 Investment of Fonds of the Employees' Provident Head 118 [Col. 8931 Fond !Col. 9511 Head 121 [Col. 8951 Head 122 [Col. 8981 ADJOURNMENT TO A LATER DATE (MOTION) Heacll 124 [Col. 9811 !Col. 9171 Head 125 [Col. 9021 Heads 126 and 127 !Col. 9831 ADJOURNMENT SINE DIE (MOTION) !Col. 9521 Heads 130, 131, 132, 133 and 135 [Col. 9061 BILLS: Heads 136, 137, 138, 139, 142 and 144 [Col. 9081 Heads 146 and 147 [Col. 916) The Degrees aod Diplomas Bill [Col. 9171 First Report of the Standing Orden Committee The Stamp (Unnumbered Shares) Bill [Col. 9181 (Fourth Session) [Col. 9271 The Assignment of Revenue (Export Doty oo Iron Ore) Bill [Col. 9201 Elimination of Commonalism from Malayan Potirics !Col. 9341 The Pensions (Public Authorities) Bill [Col. 9221 Use of Federation of Malaya as a Base by SEATO ADJOURNMENT SPEECH-POSTPONEMENT !Col. [Col. 9361 9521 Dl·CHETAK: DI-JABATAN CHETAK K:EltAJAAN OLEH THOR BENG CHONG, PEMANGK:U PENCHETAK K:llllAJAAIC PEltSEK:UTUAN TANAH MELAYU 1962 FEDERATION OP MALAYA DEWAN RA'AYAT .(HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES) Official Report Fourth Session of the First Dewan Ra'ayat Tuestiay, 26th June, 1962 The House met at Ten o'clock a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Transformation Programme
    Government Transformation Programme JABATAN PERDANA MENTERI Annual Report 2010 2010 marked the introduction and implementation of Malaysia’s Government Transformation Programme (GTP) and a new chapter in our young nation’s history. This bold and unprecedented programme aimed to radically transform the way the Government worked so we could better serve the rakyat, regardless of race, religion or social status. In embracing change, we learnt how to listen more effectively, speak more openly, see things for what they really are, develop a positive course of action and deliver tangible solutions. These efforts have laid strong foundations for the future progress of our nation and given the rakyat the assurance of a better future. This inaugural annual report of the GTP serves as a narrative of all that transpired in 2010. It records our many successes as well as shortcomings, outlines the key lessons learnt and the next steps we will take to achieve Vision 2020. As the GTP continues to impact upon and transform the lives of the rakyat for the better, the Government will continue to learn from its achievements and limitations, set higher goals and dream bigger dreams. CONTENTS Perspectives from the Top 2 – Progress of the Government Transformation Programme The Year Things Changed 4 – An Overview of Year 1, Horizon 1 of the GTP 6 Big Results Fast 14 Overview of the Government Transformation Programme 26 2010 Results of the Six National Key Result Areas 27 I Reducing Crime 65 I Fighting Corruption 105 I Improving Student Outcomes 131 I Raising
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Sources
    It is not good enough to say, in declining jurisdiction, that allowing a Muslim to come out of Islam would "create chaos and confusion" or would "threaten public order". Those are not acceptable reasons. The civil courts have the jurisdiction to interpret New Straits Times (Malaysia) April 27, 2008 the Constitution and protect the fundamental liberties, including the right to freedom of religion under Article 11. Let's have certainty in this law That jurisdiction cannot be taken away by inference or implication, as seems to be the argument, but by an express enactment Raja Aziz Addruse (Former President of Bar Council and National Human Rights Council (Hakam)) which says that it is the intention of parliament to deprive the courts of their jurisdiction. The Kamariah case also highlights other aspects of our justice system. When she was convicted of apostasy, the syariah court judge had deferred her sentencing to KAMARIAH Ali, one of the followers of the Sky Kingdom sect led by Ayah Pin, was convicted of apostasy by the Terengganu March 3 to give her a chance to show that she had repented. In sentencing her to prison for two years, the judge said that he was Syariah Court on Feb 17, 2008. Her long and futile legal struggle highlights the need to seriously address the constitutional not convinced that she had repented because she had failed to respond when he greeted her with Assalamualaikum at the start of issue of the right of Muslims to freedom of religion. the court proceedings. The picture of a lonely woman who has been ostracised from society, being continually harassed to repent, offends our sense of justice and fair play.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Education Movement in Malaysia
    INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIAL MOBILIZATION: THE CHINESE EDUCATION MOVEMENT IN MALAYSIA ANG MING CHEE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2011 i 2011 ANG MING CHEE CHEE ANG MING SOCIAL MOBILIZATION:SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND THE CHINESE EDUCATION CHINESE MOVEMENT INTHE MALAYSIA ii INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIAL MOBILIZATION: THE CHINESE EDUCATION MOVEMENT IN MALAYSIA ANG MING CHEE (MASTER OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, UPPSALA UNIVERSITET, SWEDEN) (BACHELOR OF COMMUNICATION (HONOURS), UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2011 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My utmost gratitude goes first and foremost to my supervisor, Associate Professor Jamie Seth Davidson, for his enduring support that has helped me overcome many challenges during my candidacy. His critical supervision and brilliant suggestions have helped me to mature in my academic thinking and writing skills. Most importantly, his understanding of my medical condition and readiness to lend a hand warmed my heart beyond words. I also thank my thesis committee members, Associate Professor Hussin Mutalib and Associate Professor Goh Beng Lan for their valuable feedback on my thesis drafts. I would like to thank the National University of Singapore for providing the research scholarship that enabled me to concentrate on my thesis as a full-time doctorate student in the past four years. In particular, I would also like to thank the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences for partially supporting my fieldwork expenses and the Faculty Research Cluster for allocating the precious working space. My appreciation also goes to members of my department, especially the administrative staff, for their patience and attentive assistance in facilitating various secretarial works.
    [Show full text]