ASIAN EXCHANGE Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
1988 Crisis: Salleh Shot Himself in the Foot? Malaysiakini.Com Apr 23, 2008 P Suppiah
1988 crisis: Salleh shot himself in the foot? Malaysiakini.com Apr 23, 2008 P Suppiah The personalities involved in the entire episode are as follows: * The then Yang Di Pertuan Agong (the King), now the Sultan of Johor * Tun Salleh Abas, who was then the Lord President * The prime minister (Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who was then Datuk Seri Dr), * The then attorney-general, Tan Sri Abu Talib Othman, now Suhakam chief. The whole episode started with Salleh writing a letter to the King dated March 26, 1988, copies of which were sent to the Malay rulers. On May 27, 1988 the prime minister in the presence of high-ranking government officials informed Salleh that the King wished him to step down (to retire as Lord President) because of the said letter. Salleh on May 28, 1988 sent a letter of resignation: the next day he withdrew it and subsequently held a press conference. On June 9, 1988 the prime minister made a second representation to the King alleging further misconduct on the part of Salleh based on his undignified use of the press to vent his grievances – such as requesting for a public hearing of the tribunal and asking for persons of high judicial standing to sit on the tribunal. On June 11, 1988, members of the tribunal were appointed pursuant to the Federal Constitution by the King. On June 14, 1988, Salleh was served with the list of charges against him. On June 17, 1988, Salleh was served with a set of rules to govern the tribunal procedure. -
I. the Royal Malaysia Police
HUMAN RIGHTS “No Answers, No Apology” Police Abuses and Accountability in Malaysia WATCH “No Answers, No Apology” Police Abuses and Accountability in Malaysia Copyright © 2014 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-1173 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org APRIL 2014 ISBN: 978-1-62313-1173 “No Answers, No Apology” Police Abuses and Accountability in Malaysia Glossary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Map of Malaysia ............................................................................................................. -
Ong Boon Hua @ Chin Peng & Anor V. Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negri
The Malaysian Bar Ong Boon Hua @ Chin Peng & Anor v. Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negri, Malaysia & Ors 2008 [CA] Friday, 20 June 2008 09:11PM ONG BOON HUA @ CHIN PENG & ANOR V. MENTERI HAL EHWAL DALAM NEGERI, MALAYSIA & ORS COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA [CIVIL APPEAL NO: W-01-87-2007] LOW HOP BING JCA; ABDUL MALIK ISHAK JCA; SULAIMAN DAUD JCA 15 MAY 2008 JUDGMENT Abdul Malik Ishak JCA: The Background Facts 1. Cessation of armed activities between the Government of Malaysia and the Communist Party of Malaya was a welcome news for all Malaysians. It became a reality on 2 December 1989. On that date, an agreement was entered between the Government of Malaysia (the fourth respondent/defendant) and the Communist Party of Malaya (the second appellant/applicant) to terminate armed hostilities between the parties (hereinafter referred to as the "agreement"). With the signing of the agreement, armed hostilities between the parties ended and peace prevailed. The terms of the agreement can be seen at p. 235 of the appeal record at Jilid 1 (hereinafter referred to as "ARJ1"). There were four articles to that agreement and the relevant ones read as follows: Article 3 - Residence In Malaysia 3.1 Members of the Communist Party of Malaya and members of its disbanded armed units, who are of Malaysian origin and who wish to settle down in Malaysia, shall be allowed to do so in accordance with the laws of Malaysia. 3.2 Members of the Communist Party of Malaya and members of its disbanded armed units, who are not of Malaysian origin, may be allowed to settle down in MALAYSIA in accordance with the laws of MALAYSIA, if they so desire. -
A/Hrc/32/Ni/5
联 合 国 A/HRC/32/NI/5 Distr.: General 大 会 10 June 2016 Chinese Original: English 人权理事会 第三十二届会议 议程项目 6 普遍定期审议况 马来西亚人权委员会提交的书面材料 秘书处的说明 人权理事会秘书处根据理事会第 5/1 号决议附件所载议事规则第 7 条(b)项的 规定,谨此转交下文所附马来西亚人权委员会提交的来文。** 根据该条规定, 国家人权机构的参与须遵循人权委员会议定的安排和惯例,包括 2005 年 4 月 20 日第 2005/74 号决议。 具有促进和保护人权国家机构国际协调委员会赋予的“A 类”认可地位的国家人权机构。 ** 附件不译,原文照发。 GE.16-09511 (C) 130616 130616 A/HRC/32/NI/5 Annex [English only] Contents Page I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Status of Implementation of the 150 Recommendations Accepted by Malaysia ............................. 4 2.1 International Obligations ....................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Civil and Political Rights ....................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ................................................................................... 8 2.4 Vulnerable/Marginalised Groups ............................................................................................. 11 2.5 National Mechanisms on Human Rights ............................................................................... 16 2.6 Trafficking in Persons .............................................................................................................. 17 2.7 National Unity ........................................................................................................................ -
Court Allows Attorney-General to Lead Prosecution Team
08 FEB 1999 Court-Anwar (Attorney-General) COURT ALLOWS ATTORNEY-GENERAL TO LEAD PROSECUTION TEAM KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 8 (Bernama) -- Attorney-General Tan Sri Mohtar Abdullah was today allowed by the High Court here to lead the prosecution team in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's corruption trial which has entered the defence stage. Justice Datuk S. Augustine Paul, in his ruling, said in law, the attorney-general could conduct any case and no court could question his exercise of discretion to conduct cases. He made the ruling after Anwar's leading counsel Raja Aziz Addruse objected to Mohtar's appearence together with six others including Senior Deputy Public Prosecutors Datuk Abdul Gani Patail and Azahar Mohamed. Mohtar was one of the witnesses listed and offered to the defence together with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Tun Daim Zainuddin dan Datuk Seri Megat Junid Megat Ayob. The attorney-general, who was not required by the defence as its witness, arrived at the courtroom at 8.45am. When the court sat at 9am, he informed the court that he, as the attorney-general, would lead the prosecution team at that stage. It was Mohtar's second appearence in the trial. On Nov 30, last year, he led the prosecution team in the contempt proceedings against Zainur Zakaria, one of Anwar's nine lawyers. Anwar, 51, who was dismissed from the Cabinet on Sept 2, last year, entered his defence on four charges of corrupt practice on the 51st day of trial today. He was ordered to enter his defence on charges of using his position to interfere in police investigations into allegations of sexual misconduct against him. -
Anwar Confided with Igp on His Differences with Pm, Court Told
10 FEB 1999 Court-Anwar (Meeting) ANWAR CONFIDED WITH IGP ON HIS DIFFERENCES WITH PM, COURT TOLD KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 10 (Bernama) -- Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim told the High Court here today that he had confided with the then Inspector-General of Police, Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Noor, on the "major political differences" between him and the prime minister. He described the meeting, held sometime in early August last year, as "very critical" and that he was "very frank and open" in his discussion with Rahim. "That meeting to my mind was very critical because after sometime I was very frank and open with him. I said yes, I do have major political diferences with the PM," he said. Anwar was making his defence on four counts of corrupt practice that he used his position as deputy prime minister and finance minister to interfere in police investigations into allegations of sexual misconduct against him. Today is the third day of his testimony under oath on the 53rd day of the trial before Justice Datuk S. Augustine Paul. Anwar, 51, was dismissed from his cabinet posts on Sept 2 last year. To a question by his leading counsel, Raja Aziz Addruse, Anwar said he made the admission when he was alone with Rahim in his office in the Prime Minister's Department. Deputy IGP Tan Sri Norian Mai and CID Director Datuk Yaakub Amin had earlier left the meeting, the second he had held with Rahim and senior police offices regarding the case, Anwar said. The first meeting took place in June at his official residence, also attended by Norian and two other officers. -
ARE WE ASHAMED of IPOH’S GLORIOUS PAST? by Jerry Francis “City That Tin Built” – About Sums up the History of Ipoh and Its Heritage
www.ipohecho.com.my JUNE 1 DEADLINE If you want to continue receiving the Ipoh Echo every fortnight with your daily newspaper, please IPOH inform your newsvendor. echoYour Voice In The Community See box on the right. echo May 16-31, 2010 PP 14252/10/2010(025567) FREE COPY ISSUE 97 rom 1st June please inform your news vendor to deliver the >> Pg 3 >> Pg 4 FIpoh Echo every fortnight if you wish to continue receiving your community paper. We are still a free paper. To help us defray PROTECTING THE LET’S NOT REMAIN INNOCENTS our distribution costs, we’re asking you, dear reader, to pay your A BACKWATER news vendor 30¢ per issue for delivery, i.e., a cost of 60¢ per month. A small sum for you to keep up with the latest news and information of your Ipoh community. Thank you for your continuing support of the Ipoh Echo – Your Voice of the Ipoh Community. ARE WE ASHAMED OF IPOH’S GLORIOUS PAST? By Jerry Francis “City That Tin Built” – about sums up the history of Ipoh and its heritage. These four words are also an effective slogan to promote the city. Not “Bougainvillea City” or by any other slogans. On May 27 Ipoh will celebrate its 22nd anniversary as a city. But it is sad that through all those years nothing seems to have been done to reflect its glorious past as the centre of the tin mining industry which had been so significant in the economic development of the country. The tin mining industry has since collapsed; the history of the city will also slowly fade away and be forgotten. -
5 February 2010)
0903346 [2010] RRTA 41 (5 February 2010) DECISION RECORD RRT CASE NUMBER: 0903346 DIAC REFERENCE(S): CLF2009/29876 COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Malaysia TRIBUNAL MEMBER: Rosa Gagliardi DATE: 5 February 2010 PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne DECISION: The Tribunal remits the matter for reconsideration with the direction that the applicant satisfies s.36(2)(a) of the Migration Act, being a person to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention. STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship to refuse to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). 2. The applicant, who claims to be a citizen of Malaysia arrived in Australia [in] February 2009 and applied to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship for a Protection (Class XA) visa [in] March 2009. The delegate decided to refuse to grant the visa [in] April 2009 and notified the applicant of the decision and her review rights by letter dated [in] April 2009. 3. The delegate refused the visa application on the basis that it was considered that the applicant is not a person to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention. 4. The applicant applied to the Tribunal [in] May 2009 for review of the delegate’s decision. 5. The Tribunal finds that the delegate’s decision is an RRT-reviewable decision under s.411(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal finds that the applicant has made a valid application for review under s.412 of the Act. -
Parliamentary Debates
Volume IV Tuesday No. 8 26th June, 1962 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DEWAN RA'AYAT (HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES) OFFICIAL REPORT CONTENTS ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS [Col. 8591 "Living Wage" Legislation [Col. 9411 MOTIONS: Establishment of Dock Labour Board, Penana (Withdrawal of Motion) [Col. 9461 The Development (Supplementary) (No. 1) Estimatet1, 1962 !CoL 8621 Kilang Baja Urea Dan Kertas <Meoarek Balek UsoD Head 101 [Col. 8821 [Col. 9471 Head 103 !Col. 8831 Daily-Rated System of Wages (Abolition) [Col. 9471 Heads 1415 and 109 [Col. 8861 Head 114 !Col. 8901 Investment of Fonds of the Employees' Provident Head 118 [Col. 8931 Fond !Col. 9511 Head 121 [Col. 8951 Head 122 [Col. 8981 ADJOURNMENT TO A LATER DATE (MOTION) Heacll 124 [Col. 9811 !Col. 9171 Head 125 [Col. 9021 Heads 126 and 127 !Col. 9831 ADJOURNMENT SINE DIE (MOTION) !Col. 9521 Heads 130, 131, 132, 133 and 135 [Col. 9061 BILLS: Heads 136, 137, 138, 139, 142 and 144 [Col. 9081 Heads 146 and 147 [Col. 916) The Degrees aod Diplomas Bill [Col. 9171 First Report of the Standing Orden Committee The Stamp (Unnumbered Shares) Bill [Col. 9181 (Fourth Session) [Col. 9271 The Assignment of Revenue (Export Doty oo Iron Ore) Bill [Col. 9201 Elimination of Commonalism from Malayan Potirics !Col. 9341 The Pensions (Public Authorities) Bill [Col. 9221 Use of Federation of Malaya as a Base by SEATO ADJOURNMENT SPEECH-POSTPONEMENT !Col. [Col. 9361 9521 Dl·CHETAK: DI-JABATAN CHETAK K:EltAJAAN OLEH THOR BENG CHONG, PEMANGK:U PENCHETAK K:llllAJAAIC PEltSEK:UTUAN TANAH MELAYU 1962 FEDERATION OP MALAYA DEWAN RA'AYAT .(HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES) Official Report Fourth Session of the First Dewan Ra'ayat Tuestiay, 26th June, 1962 The House met at Ten o'clock a.m. -
Government Transformation Programme
Government Transformation Programme JABATAN PERDANA MENTERI Annual Report 2010 2010 marked the introduction and implementation of Malaysia’s Government Transformation Programme (GTP) and a new chapter in our young nation’s history. This bold and unprecedented programme aimed to radically transform the way the Government worked so we could better serve the rakyat, regardless of race, religion or social status. In embracing change, we learnt how to listen more effectively, speak more openly, see things for what they really are, develop a positive course of action and deliver tangible solutions. These efforts have laid strong foundations for the future progress of our nation and given the rakyat the assurance of a better future. This inaugural annual report of the GTP serves as a narrative of all that transpired in 2010. It records our many successes as well as shortcomings, outlines the key lessons learnt and the next steps we will take to achieve Vision 2020. As the GTP continues to impact upon and transform the lives of the rakyat for the better, the Government will continue to learn from its achievements and limitations, set higher goals and dream bigger dreams. CONTENTS Perspectives from the Top 2 – Progress of the Government Transformation Programme The Year Things Changed 4 – An Overview of Year 1, Horizon 1 of the GTP 6 Big Results Fast 14 Overview of the Government Transformation Programme 26 2010 Results of the Six National Key Result Areas 27 I Reducing Crime 65 I Fighting Corruption 105 I Improving Student Outcomes 131 I Raising -
Primary Sources
It is not good enough to say, in declining jurisdiction, that allowing a Muslim to come out of Islam would "create chaos and confusion" or would "threaten public order". Those are not acceptable reasons. The civil courts have the jurisdiction to interpret New Straits Times (Malaysia) April 27, 2008 the Constitution and protect the fundamental liberties, including the right to freedom of religion under Article 11. Let's have certainty in this law That jurisdiction cannot be taken away by inference or implication, as seems to be the argument, but by an express enactment Raja Aziz Addruse (Former President of Bar Council and National Human Rights Council (Hakam)) which says that it is the intention of parliament to deprive the courts of their jurisdiction. The Kamariah case also highlights other aspects of our justice system. When she was convicted of apostasy, the syariah court judge had deferred her sentencing to KAMARIAH Ali, one of the followers of the Sky Kingdom sect led by Ayah Pin, was convicted of apostasy by the Terengganu March 3 to give her a chance to show that she had repented. In sentencing her to prison for two years, the judge said that he was Syariah Court on Feb 17, 2008. Her long and futile legal struggle highlights the need to seriously address the constitutional not convinced that she had repented because she had failed to respond when he greeted her with Assalamualaikum at the start of issue of the right of Muslims to freedom of religion. the court proceedings. The picture of a lonely woman who has been ostracised from society, being continually harassed to repent, offends our sense of justice and fair play. -
The Chinese Education Movement in Malaysia
INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIAL MOBILIZATION: THE CHINESE EDUCATION MOVEMENT IN MALAYSIA ANG MING CHEE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2011 i 2011 ANG MING CHEE CHEE ANG MING SOCIAL MOBILIZATION:SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND THE CHINESE EDUCATION CHINESE MOVEMENT INTHE MALAYSIA ii INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIAL MOBILIZATION: THE CHINESE EDUCATION MOVEMENT IN MALAYSIA ANG MING CHEE (MASTER OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, UPPSALA UNIVERSITET, SWEDEN) (BACHELOR OF COMMUNICATION (HONOURS), UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2011 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My utmost gratitude goes first and foremost to my supervisor, Associate Professor Jamie Seth Davidson, for his enduring support that has helped me overcome many challenges during my candidacy. His critical supervision and brilliant suggestions have helped me to mature in my academic thinking and writing skills. Most importantly, his understanding of my medical condition and readiness to lend a hand warmed my heart beyond words. I also thank my thesis committee members, Associate Professor Hussin Mutalib and Associate Professor Goh Beng Lan for their valuable feedback on my thesis drafts. I would like to thank the National University of Singapore for providing the research scholarship that enabled me to concentrate on my thesis as a full-time doctorate student in the past four years. In particular, I would also like to thank the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences for partially supporting my fieldwork expenses and the Faculty Research Cluster for allocating the precious working space. My appreciation also goes to members of my department, especially the administrative staff, for their patience and attentive assistance in facilitating various secretarial works.