Imperial Russia New Historiesσ for the Empire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Imperial Russia New Historiesσ for the Empire σ IMPERIALσ RUSSIA σ Sponsored by the Joint Committee on the Soviet Union and Its Successor States of the Social Science Research Council and the Americanσ Council of Learned Societies. indiana-michigan series in russian and east european studies Alexander Rabinowitch and William G. Rosenberg, general editors advisory board Deming Brown Jane Burbank Robert W. Campbell Henry R. Cooper, Jr. Herbert Eagle Ben Eklof Zvi Gitelman Hiroaki Kuromiya David L. Ransel William Zimmerman σ IMPERIAL RUSSIA NEW HISTORIESσ FOR THE EMPIRE EDITED BY Jane Burbank AND David L. Ransel INDIANA UNIVERSITY PRESS Bloomington and Indianapolis This book is a publication of Indiana University Press 601 North Morton Street Bloomington, Indiana 47404-3797 USA www.indiana.edu/~iupress Telephone orders 800-842-6796 Fax orders 812-855-7931 Orders by e-mail [email protected] © 1998 by Indiana University Press All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Association of American University Presses’ Resolution on Permissions constitutes the only exception to this prohibition. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Imperial Russia : new histories for the Empire / edited by Jane Burbank and David L. Ransel. p. cm. — (Indiana-Michigan series in Russian and East European studies) Includes index. ISBN 0-253-33462-4 (cloth : alk. paper). — ISBN 0-253-21241-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Russia—History—18th century. 2. Russia—History—19th century. I. Burbank, Jane. II. Ransel, David L. III. Series. DK127.I475 1998 947′.06—dc21 98-1 7132 1 2 3 4 5 03 02 01 00 99 98 σContents Acknowledgments xi Introduction Jane Burbank and David L. Ransel xiii Part i Autocracy: Politics, Ideology, Symbol 1 1 Kinship Politics/Autocratic Politics: A Reconsideration of Early-Eighteenth-Century Political Culture Valerie A. Kivelson 5 2 The Idea of Autocracy among Eighteenth-Century Russian Historians Cynthia Hyla Whittaker 32 3 The Russian Imperial Family as Symbol Richard Wortman 60 Part ii Imperial Imagination 87 4 Collecting the Fatherland: Early-Nineteenth-Century Proposals for a Russian National Museum Kevin Tyner Thomas 91 5 Science, Empire, and Nationality: Ethnography in the Russian Geographical Society, 1845–1855 Nathaniel Knight 108 Part iii Practices of Empire 143 6 Lines of Uncertainty: The Frontiers of the Northern Caucasus Thomas M. Barrett 148 7 An Empire of Peasants: Empire-Building, Interethnic Interaction, and Ethnic Stereotyping in the Rural World of the Russian Empire, 1800–1850s Willard Sunderland 174 8 The Serf Economy, the Peasant Family, and the Social Order Steven L. Hoch 199 9 Institutionalizing Piety: The Church and Popular Religion, 1750–1850 Gregory L. Freeze 210 Part iv Individuals and Publics 251 10 An Eighteenth-Century Russian Merchant Family in Prosperity and Decline David L. Ransel 256 11 Freemasonry and the Public in Eighteenth-Century Russia Douglas Smith 281 12 Constructing the Meaning of Suicide: The Russian Press in the Age of the Great Reforms Irina Paperno 305 In Place of a Conclusion Jane Burbank 333 Contributors 347 Index 349 Acknowledgments σ he editors thank several institutions and many scholars for the support, Tresearch, and stimulating discussions that made this project possible. We begin with our sponsors. The Joint Committee on the Soviet Union and Its Suc- cessor States of the Social Science Research Council and the American Council of Learned Societies provided the material, logistical, and personal support for three workshops for the project as well as seed money for the volume itself. We are particularly grateful to Susan Bronson, historian of imperial Russia and for- mer Program Of¤cer at the SSRC, who has seen this project through from be- ginning to completion; to Robert Huber, former Program Director of the Joint Committee, who gave superb advice on both intellectual and ¤nancial matters; and to Jill Finger, Program Assistant, who directed everyone to the right place at the right time. The organizers of the SSRC-ACLS project were Jane Burbank, Nancy Shields Kollmann, Richard Stites, and Reginald Zelnik, members of the Joint Committee. A planning meeting was held at the University of Iowa in November 1991, supported in part by the Center for International and Comparative Studies there. We thank the Center and in particular Steven Hoch, our host on the steppe in a snowstorm, for the warm reception and gracious adjustments to weather wor- thy of Russia. The papers in the volume were produced for two workshops, entitled “Visions, Institutions, and Experiences of Imperial Russia.” The ¤rst workshop was held at the Kennan Institute of Advanced Russian Studies in Washington, D.C., in September 1993. We thank the Institute and above all its director, Blair Ruble, for hosting us and especially for our splendid meeting place in the Smithsonian castle. The second workshop was cosponsored by Portland State University at its lovely urban campus. Our historian host, Louise Becker, made this an ideal lo- cation. The discussions at all three meetings focused on the issues of interpreta- tion, analysis, and categorization that inform this volume. We are grateful to all the participants in the meetings, including the authors of the chapters presented here, for their many contributions to the project. A big thank you, then, to Thomas Barrett, Sarah Berry, Jeffrey Brooks, Daniel Brower, Michael Con¤no, ix x Acknowledgments James Cracraft, Laura Engelstein, Lee Farrow, Gregory Freeze, Manfred Hilde- meier, Steven L. Hoch, Isabel Hull, Austin Jersild, Colin Jones, Andrew Kahn, Andreas Kappeler, Allison Katsev, Michael Khodarkovsky, Valerie Kivelson, Nathaniel Knight, Nancy Shields Kollmann, Gary Marker, Louise McReynolds, Harriet Murav, Daniel Orlovsky, Irina Paperno, Priscilla Roosevelt, David Schimmelpeninck, Yuri Slezkine, Douglas Smith, Michael Stanislawski, Rich- ard Stites, Willard Sunderland, Frank Sysyn, Kevin Thomas, Donald Thumin, William Wagner, Cynthia Whittaker, Richard Wortman, and Reginald E. Zelnik. The editors are especially grateful to Michael Con¤no for his supportive engagement with this project, which was inspired in the ¤rst place by his splen- did and provocative studies of imperial Russia. Jane Burbank David L. Ransel Introduction σ he goal of this volume is to raise questions and to encourage scholars to re- Tenvision imperial Russian history liberated from schools, parties, and single story lines. The essays incorporate new research and new topics, results of a revitalized attention to Russia’s past that has engaged historians and others in recent years. The volume has a speci¤c genealogy: it is based upon a series of three workshops at which scholars from different universities, disciplines, and generations discussed new research and encouraged each other to imagine how imperial history might be reconceptualized. This introduction will sketch the intellectual and social context of this project and highlight the themes, ques- tions, and methods represented in the book’s separate subsections and chapters. With an eye toward future projects, Jane Burbank’s “In Place of a Conclusion” takes a critical look at the blank spots, open questions, and un¤lled plans that are likely to shape histories of imperial Russia still to come. Reconceptualization of imperial Russian history was inspired by two recent changes: the collapse of Soviet power and with it the conventional framework for narratives of Russian history, and a new turn in historical writing about other places and times. The sudden appearance in 1917 of Soviet Russia with its claim to be the ¤rst socialist society had oriented much of the historical study of Russia in the twentieth century toward the problems and possibilities of Soviet-style organization, and, of particular relevance to this volume, toward the origins of the Russian revolution. This emphasis upon the Bolshevik revo- lution relegated Russian history before 1917 if not to the dustbin, then to the morgue. Many studies of the imperial era were scholarly autopsies, performed in con¤dent awareness of the body’s chronic ailments; the overriding ques- tion concerned the disease or combination of illnesses that had caused the or- ganism’s long-overdue demise. This perspective was a matter of form, if not faith, for most Soviet historians, but it ¤gured, too, in many other interpreta- tions. Nicholas Riasanovsky placed the blame for the revolution of 1917 on the rigidity of the system created by Nicholas I in the ¤rst half of the nineteenth century; Richard Pipes, following Petr Struve, pushed the beginnings of the em- pire’s illnesses back into the early eighteenth century.1 The dissolution of the Soviet Union was accompanied by a reversal of evaluations of imperial Russia. In Russia, challenges to of¤cial history became xi xii Introduction weapons in the political offensives of perestroika and the subsequent struggles for control over the new polities emerging after 1991. Much of the history pub- lished in the popular press in the last years of the Soviet Union and the early years of the new Russian Federation described the whole Soviet period as a per- version of “normal” development. From this partisan perspective, imperial Rus- sian history was re¤gured to represent the natural order. The corpse was ex- humed and the autopsy performed again, this time to reveal the body’s robust growth and strength before an untimely, tragic, perhaps criminal death. For historians eager to move out from the long shadow cast over the tsar- ist period by the Soviet project and, at the same time, willing to investigate revisionist narratives before proclaiming them, the 1990s offered a chance to re- excavate the historic site of imperial Russia with new imagination and atten- tiveness.
Recommended publications
  • FAMILY FARM the Next Generation
    FAMILY FARM The Next Generation © AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ESTATE PLANNING ATTORNEYS, INC. Family Farm: The Next Generation 1 INTRODUCTION A humorous take on how families pass on businesses, such as family farms, is reflected in this quip: Avenge your children; give them equal shares in your business. Certainly, what can seem like a generous, wonderful thing can be rife with conflict and imbalance, if you don’t take steps to implement the appropriate legal framework. Landowners, ranchers, and farmers face unique challenges surrounding how to preserve the family farm; a symbol of their heritage. This report focuses on the legal and management issues of managing the family farm, and steps you can take to ensure the smooth transition from generation to generation with ease and accuracy. PLANNING IS KEY Whether your family is running a farm, managing a large parcel of land, or operating a chain of feed stores, transitions in stock ownership — either through death, retirement, divorce, or just the desire to sell one’s shares — can cause turmoil in the family. But harmony can be maintained, and many difficult family business circumstances can be anticipated and planned for, if everyone agrees in advance how situations will be handled. The key word, however, in this statement is: advance. As with most situations, being prepared ahead of time means the difference between getting it right and seeing it with hindsight. For this purpose there are buy-sell agreements, which are basically contracts that specify certain rights among the owners of a family business. Sometimes a buy-sell agreement is incorporated into a Living Trust, other times it is a separate document.
    [Show full text]
  • CLR James and the Black Jacobins
    Atlantic Studies Global Currents ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjas20 Unsilencing the Haitian Revolution: C. L. R. James and The Black Jacobins Rachel Douglas To cite this article: Rachel Douglas (2020): Unsilencing the Haitian Revolution: C. L. R. James and TheBlackJacobins , Atlantic Studies, DOI: 10.1080/14788810.2020.1839283 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14788810.2020.1839283 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 19 Nov 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjas20 ATLANTIC STUDIES https://doi.org/10.1080/14788810.2020.1839283 Unsilencing the Haitian Revolution: C. L. R. James and The Black Jacobins Rachel Douglas French and Comparative Literature, School of Modern Languages and Cultures, University of Glasgow, UK ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Exploring the genesis, transformation and afterlives of The Black Rewriting; Haitian Jacobins, this article follows the revision trail of James’s evolving Revolution; Toussaint interest in Toussaint Louverture. How does James “show” as Louverture; Caribbean; drama versus “tell” as history? Building on Michel-Rolph Trouillot’s theatre/drama; history from below idea of “silencing the past,” this article argues that James engages in an equally active and transitive reverse process of unsilencing the past. James’s own unsilencing of certain negative representations of the Haitian Revolution is evaluated, as is James’s move away from presenting the colonized as passive objects, instead turning them instead into active subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe European History Yearbook Jahrbuch Für Europäische Geschichte
    Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe European History Yearbook Jahrbuch für Europäische Geschichte Edited by Johannes Paulmann in cooperation with Markus Friedrich and Nick Stargardt Volume 20 Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe Edited by Cornelia Aust, Denise Klein, and Thomas Weller Edited at Leibniz-Institut für Europäische Geschichte by Johannes Paulmann in cooperation with Markus Friedrich and Nick Stargardt Founding Editor: Heinz Duchhardt ISBN 978-3-11-063204-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-063594-2 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-063238-5 ISSN 1616-6485 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 04. International License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number:2019944682 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published in open access at www.degruyter.com. Typesetting: Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd. Printing and Binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck Cover image: Eustaţie Altini: Portrait of a woman, 1813–1815 © National Museum of Art, Bucharest www.degruyter.com Contents Cornelia Aust, Denise Klein, and Thomas Weller Introduction 1 Gabriel Guarino “The Antipathy between French and Spaniards”: Dress, Gender, and Identity in the Court Society of Early Modern
    [Show full text]
  • Choices and Constraints in the Pre-Industrial Countryside
    Choices and Constraints in the Pre-Industrial Countryside Sheilagh Ogilvie Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge [email protected] CWPESH no. 1 Plenary Lecture for Population, Economy and Welfare, c. 1200 – 2000: a Conference in Honour of Richard Smith , Cambridge, 16 September 2011 Abstract : This paper explores a key implication of Richard Smith’s work on agrarian societies: the need to be attentive both to rural people’s decisions as economic agents and to the constraints on their choices. It begins by examining evidence of goal- maximizing behaviour by rural people – not just peasant farmers but women, servants, serfs, landless workers, youths, and many others – in a diversity of pre-industrial societies. It then analyses some central constraints within which rural people made their choices: family and inheritance systems, village communities, manorial systems, legal rules and customs, and the actions of rulers. It concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for understanding the functioning of rural economies, now widely recognized as central to long-term improvements in economic growth and human well-being. 1 1. Introduction This paper explores a central implication of Richard Smith’s work on agrarian societies: the need to be attentive both to rural people’s decisions as economic agents and to the constraints on those choices. As early as 1979, Smith pointed out that although people in the pre-modern English countryside made individualistic choices, ‘This does not necessarily require us to approach this society with a purely voluntaristic model of social behaviour for we have to define the structural limits within which people interacted’.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Woolf's Portraits of Russian Writers
    Virginia Woolf’s Portraits of Russian Writers Virginia Woolf’s Portraits of Russian Writers: Creating the Literary Other By Darya Protopopova Virginia Woolf’s Portraits of Russian Writers: Creating the Literary Other By Darya Protopopova This book first published 2019 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2019 by Darya Protopopova All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-2753-0 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-2753-9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Note on the Text ........................................................................................ vi Preface ...................................................................................................... vii Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Russia and the British Search for the Cultural ‘Other’ Chapter One .............................................................................................. 32 Woolf’s Real and Fictional Russians Chapter Two ............................................................................................. 58 Woolf and Dostoevsky: Verbalising the Soul Chapter Three ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Shadow of Napoleon Upon Lee at Gettysburg
    Papers of the 2017 Gettysburg National Military Park Seminar The Shadow of Napoleon upon Lee at Gettysburg Charles Teague Every general commanding an army hopes to win the next battle. Some will dream that they might accomplish a decisive victory, and in this Robert E. Lee was no different. By the late spring of 1863 he already had notable successes in battlefield trials. But now, over two years into a devastating war, he was looking to destroy the military force that would again oppose him, thereby assuring an end to the war to the benefit of the Confederate States of America. In the late spring of 1863 he embarked upon an audacious plan that necessitated a huge vulnerability: uncovering the capital city of Richmond. His speculation, which proved prescient, was that the Union army that lay between the two capitals would be directed to pursue and block him as he advanced north Robert E. Lee, 1865 (LOC) of the Potomac River. He would thereby draw it out of entrenched defensive positions held along the Rappahannock River and into the open, stretched out by marching. He expected that force to risk a battle against his Army of Northern Virginia, one that could bring a Federal defeat such that the cities of Philadelphia, Baltimore, or Washington might succumb, morale in the North to continue the war would plummet, and the South could achieve its true independence. One of Lee’s major generals would later explain that Lee told him in the march to battle of his goal to destroy the Union army.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inextricable Link Between Literature and Music in 19Th
    COMPOSERS AS STORYTELLERS: THE INEXTRICABLE LINK BETWEEN LITERATURE AND MUSIC IN 19TH CENTURY RUSSIA A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Music Ashley Shank December 2010 COMPOSERS AS STORYTELLERS: THE INEXTRICABLE LINK BETWEEN LITERATURE AND MUSIC IN 19TH CENTURY RUSSIA Ashley Shank Thesis Approved: Accepted: _______________________________ _______________________________ Advisor Interim Dean of the College Dr. Brooks Toliver Dr. Dudley Turner _______________________________ _______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Mr. George Pope Dr. George R. Newkome _______________________________ _______________________________ School Director Date Dr. William Guegold ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECULAR ART MUSIC IN RUSSIA……..………………………………………………..……………….1 Introduction……………………..…………………………………………………1 The Introduction of Secular High Art………………………………………..……3 Nicholas I and the Rise of the Noble Dilettantes…………………..………….....10 The Rise of the Russian School and Musical Professionalism……..……………19 Nationalism…………………………..………………………………………..…23 Arts Policies and Censorship………………………..…………………………...25 II. MUSIC AND LITERATURE AS A CULTURAL DUET………………..…32 Cross-Pollination……………………………………………………………...…32 The Russian Soul in Literature and Music………………..……………………...38 Music in Poetry: Sound and Form…………………………..……………...……44 III. STORIES IN MUSIC…………………………………………………… ….51 iii Opera……………………………………………………………………………..57
    [Show full text]
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire
    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 333 Humanities and Social Sciences: Novations, Problems, Prospects (HSSNPP 2019) Impact of Agricultural Climatic Potential on Development of Regional Grain Market Generalov I. Suslov S. Economics and automation of business processes Economics and automation of business processes Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Knyaginino, Russia Knyaginino, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Bazhenov R. Zavivaev S. Information systems, mathematics and legal informatics Technical and biological systems Sholom-Aleichem Priamursky State University Nizhny Novgorod State Engineering and Economic University Birobidzhan, Russia Knyaginino, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Dolmatova O. Land management Omsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin Omsk, Russia [email protected] Abstract—The Nizhny Novgorod region is one of the leading turnover fall to the share of the Russian agrarian and industrial economically developed areas of the Russian Federation with high complex also confirms the need of its providing. potential for the development of agriculture. The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of agricultural climatic features on the In complex economic conditions of the Russian Federation, development of grain farming in the region. The article includes the control of various economic mechanisms moves to the the official data taken from the Nizhny Novgorod region forefront. The strategic need of development of competitive Territorial body of state statistics concerning indicators agriculture demands creation of the accurate system based on characterizing the amounts of grain sales. As a result, the main understanding of the needs of participants of the market and the features of grain sales are revealed within seven agricultural state.
    [Show full text]
  • Refractions of Rome in the Russian Political Imagination by Olga Greco
    From Triumphal Gates to Triumphant Rotting: Refractions of Rome in the Russian Political Imagination by Olga Greco A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Comparative Literature) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Valerie A. Kivelson, Chair Assistant Professor Paolo Asso Associate Professor Basil J. Dufallo Assistant Professor Benjamin B. Paloff With much gratitude to Valerie Kivelson, for her unflagging support, to Yana, for her coffee and tangerines, and to the Prawns, for keeping me sane. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication ............................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter I. Writing Empire: Lomonosov’s Rivalry with Imperial Rome ................................... 31 II. Qualifying Empire: Morals and Ethics of Derzhavin’s Romans ............................... 76 III. Freedom, Tyrannicide, and Roman Heroes in the Works of Pushkin and Ryleev .. 122 IV. Ivan Goncharov’s Oblomov and the Rejection of the Political [Rome] .................. 175 V. Blok, Catiline, and the Decomposition of Empire .................................................. 222 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 271 Bibliography .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co
    THE TURKS AND EUROPE BY GASTON GAILLARD LONDON: THOMAS MURBY & CO. 1 FLEET LANE, E.C. 1921 1 vi CONTENTS PAGES VI. THE TREATY WITH TURKEY: Mustafa Kemal’s Protest—Protests of Ahmed Riza and Galib Kemaly— Protest of the Indian Caliphate Delegation—Survey of the Treaty—The Turkish Press and the Treaty—Jafar Tayar at Adrianople—Operations of the Government Forces against the Nationalists—French Armistice in Cilicia—Mustafa Kemal’s Operations—Greek Operations in Asia Minor— The Ottoman Delegation’s Observations at the Peace Conference—The Allies’ Answer—Greek Operations in Thrace—The Ottoman Government decides to sign the Treaty—Italo-Greek Incident, and Protests of Armenia, Yugo-Slavia, and King Hussein—Signature of the Treaty – 169—271 VII. THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1. The Turco-Armenian Question - 274—304 2. The Pan-Turanian and Pan-Arabian Movements: Origin of Pan-Turanism—The Turks and the Arabs—The Hejaz—The Emir Feisal—The Question of Syria—French Operations in Syria— Restoration of Greater Lebanon—The Arabian World and the Caliphate—The Part played by Islam - 304—356 VIII. THE MOSLEMS OF THE FORMER RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND TURKEY: The Republic of Northern Caucasus—Georgia and Azerbaïjan—The Bolshevists in the Republics of Caucasus and of the Transcaspian Isthmus—Armenians and Moslems - 357—369 IX. TURKEY AND THE SLAVS: Slavs versus Turks—Constantinople and Russia - 370—408 2 THE TURKS AND EUROPE I THE TURKS The peoples who speak the various Turkish dialects and who bear the generic name of Turcomans, or Turco-Tatars, are distributed over huge territories occupying nearly half of Asia and an important part of Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nord Stream Pipeline and European Energy Security
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Divisive identities, divided foreign policy? Policy makers' discourses on Russia in Germany, Poland and Finland Marco Siddi PhD University of Edinburgh University of Cologne 2014 Declaration of originality This is to certify that the work contained within has been composed by me and is entirely my own work. No part of this thesis has been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. …………………………………….. Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... i Abstract ....................................................................................................................... ii Chapter 1: Identity,
    [Show full text]