DOCSLIB.ORG

A Meta Model for the Design of Domain Ontologies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Meta Model for the Design of Domain Ontologies Technical Report LPT-2008-27 Material J. Morbach, A. Yang, W. Marquardt July 2008 Enquiries should be addressed to: RWTH Aachen University Aachener Verfahrenstechnik Process Systems Engineering 52056 Aachen Tel.: +49 (0) 241 80 - 94668 Fax: +49 (0) 241 80 - 92326 E-Mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ iv 1. Partial Model ‘Material’.................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Relation Between ‘Phase System’ and ‘Material Amount’ ................................................... 3 1.2. Material (Ontology Module).................................................................................................. 3 Concept Descriptions ...................................................................................................................... 4 Classes............................................................................................................................................. 4 Relations.......................................................................................................................................... 4 Individuals....................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Substance (Partial Model) ............................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Substance (Ontology Module) ............................................................................................... 7 Usage............................................................................................................................................. 11 Concept Descriptions .................................................................................................................... 12 Classes........................................................................................................................................... 12 Relations........................................................................................................................................ 16 Attributes....................................................................................................................................... 17 2.2. Molecular Structure .............................................................................................................22 Usage............................................................................................................................................. 25 Concept Descriptions .................................................................................................................... 25 Classes........................................................................................................................................... 25 Relations........................................................................................................................................ 30 Attributes....................................................................................................................................... 31 Individuals..................................................................................................................................... 31 2.3. Polymers .............................................................................................................................. 33 Usage............................................................................................................................................. 34 Concept Descriptions .................................................................................................................... 35 Classes........................................................................................................................................... 35 2.4. Chemical Species................................................................................................................. 37 Usage............................................................................................................................................. 38 2.5. Atoms................................................................................................................................... 38 2.6. Macromolecules................................................................................................................... 39 2.7. Substance Class.................................................................................................................... 39 Concept Descriptions .................................................................................................................... 41 2.8. Reaction Mechanism............................................................................................................ 41 Usage............................................................................................................................................. 43 Concept Descriptions .................................................................................................................... 44 Classes........................................................................................................................................... 44 Relations........................................................................................................................................ 47 Attributes....................................................................................................................................... 49 2.9. Reaction Type ...................................................................................................................... 49 Concept Descriptions .................................................................................................................... 50 3. Phase System................................................................................................................................. 51 3.1. High-level concepts .............................................................................................................51 High-Level Concepts..................................................................................................................... 51 3.2. Properties of Phase Systems ................................................................................................ 53 3.3. Physical Context .................................................................................................................. 55 3.4. Reactions in Phase Systems ................................................................................................. 57 Concept definitions........................................................................................................................ 57 Classes........................................................................................................................................... 57 Relations........................................................................................................................................ 70 References ............................................................................................................................................. 73 Appendix A Character replacements for generating OWL identifiers ........................................ 75 Appendix B Documentation Format ........................................................................................... 78 Index of Concepts.................................................................................................................................. 81 iii List of Figures Fig. 1: Structure of the partial model material ....................................................................................... 1 Fig. 2: Major classes of the partial model material................................................................................ 2 Fig. 3: Structure of the partial model substance..................................................................................... 6 Fig. 4: Major concepts of substance........................................................................................................ 7 Fig. 5: Representation of pure substances at the macroscopic and the atomic scale............................... 8 Fig. 6: Some chemical component constants .............................................................................................. 9 Fig. 7: Substance identifiers .................................................................................................................... 9 Fig. 8: Chemical formulas..................................................................................................................... 10 Fig. 9: Two different macroscopic appearances of a molecular entity..................................................... 11 Fig. 10: Definition of brass as a subclass of mixture .............................................................................. 12 Fig. 11: Representation of ions.............................................................................................................. 23 Fig. 12: Representation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Glossary of Terms Used in Photochemistry, 3Rd Edition (IUPAC
    Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 293–465, 2007. doi:10.1351/pac200779030293 © 2007 IUPAC INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY ORGANIC AND BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY DIVISION* SUBCOMMITTEE ON PHOTOCHEMISTRY GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN PHOTOCHEMISTRY 3rd EDITION (IUPAC Recommendations 2006) Prepared for publication by S. E. BRASLAVSKY‡ Max-Planck-Institut für Bioanorganische Chemie, Postfach 10 13 65, 45413 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany *Membership of the Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry Division Committee during the preparation of this re- port (2003–2006) was as follows: President: T. T. Tidwell (1998–2003), M. Isobe (2002–2005); Vice President: D. StC. Black (1996–2003), V. T. Ivanov (1996–2005); Secretary: G. M. Blackburn (2002–2005); Past President: T. Norin (1996–2003), T. T. Tidwell (1998–2005) (initial date indicates first time elected as Division member). The list of the other Division members can be found in <http://www.iupac.org/divisions/III/members.html>. Membership of the Subcommittee on Photochemistry (2003–2005) was as follows: S. E. Braslavsky (Germany, Chairperson), A. U. Acuña (Spain), T. D. Z. Atvars (Brazil), C. Bohne (Canada), R. Bonneau (France), A. M. Braun (Germany), A. Chibisov (Russia), K. Ghiggino (Australia), A. Kutateladze (USA), H. Lemmetyinen (Finland), M. Litter (Argentina), H. Miyasaka (Japan), M. Olivucci (Italy), D. Phillips (UK), R. O. Rahn (USA), E. San Román (Argentina), N. Serpone (Canada), M. Terazima (Japan). Contributors to the 3rd edition were: A. U. Acuña, W. Adam, F. Amat, D. Armesto, T. D. Z. Atvars, A. Bard, E. Bill, L. O. Björn, C. Bohne, J. Bolton, R. Bonneau, H.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,716,300 B2 Piccariello Et Al
    USOO871 6300B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,716,300 B2 Piccariello et al. (45) Date of Patent: *May 6, 2014 (54) FREQUENCY MODULATED DRUG FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS DELIVERY (FMDD) EP O914826 A1 5, 1999 (75) Inventors: Thomas Piccariello, Blacksburg, VA WO WOO3,O74474 A2 9, 2003 (US); Scott B. Palmer, Wilmette, IL OTHER PUBLICATIONS (US); John D. Price, Blacksburg, VA (US); Robert Oberlender, Blacksburg, Ama et al., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., vol. 62, pp. 3464-3468 (1989). VA (US); Mary C. Spencer, Blacksburg, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International VA (US); Michaela E. Mulhare, Application No. PCT/US2009/067136, issued Jun. 14, 2011 (6 Christiansburg, VA (US) pages). International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/ (73) Assignee: Synthonics, Inc., Blacksburg, VA (US) US2009/067136, mailed Mar. 16, 2010 (2 pages). Islam, M. Saidullet al., “Antibacterial and antifungal activity of mixed (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this ligand complexes of oxovanadium (IV), titanium (III) and cadmium patent is extended or adjusted under 35 (II) metal ions.” Oriental Journal of Chemistry, 19(3):547-554 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. (2003). Jain, Sangeeta, et al., “Synthesis and biological evaluation of mixed This patent is Subject to a terminal dis ligand complexes of pyrazinamide and isoniazid.” Oriental Journal of claimer. Chemistry, 2002):409-410 (2004). Khan, F. “Study of mixed ligand complexes of Zn(ID with some (21) Appl. No.: 13/542,301 antibiotics and vitamin-B1 drugs, Kinetics of electrode reactions.” Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 84(7):702-705 (Jul 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • IUPAC Glossary of Terms Used in Photochemistry
    Glossary of terms used in photochemistry, 3rd Edition, 2006 1 10/10/2006 GlossaryOct10-06-corr-notrack.doc INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY ORGANIC AND BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY DIVISION* SUB-COMMITTEE ON PHOTOCHEMISTRY GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN PHOTOCHEMISTRY 3rd Edition (IUPAC Recommendations 2006) Prepared for publication by S. E. BRASLAVSKY‡ Max-Planck-Institut für Bioanorganische Chemie, Postfach 10 13 65, 45413 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany *Membership of the Division Committee during preparation of this report (2003-2006) was as follows: Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry Division (III) Committee: President: T. T. Tidwell (1998−2003), M. Isobe (2002−2005); VicePresident: D. StC. Black (1996−2003), V. T. Ivanov (1996−2005); Secretary: G. M. Blackburn (2002−2005); Past President: T. Norin (1996−2003), T. T. Tidwell (1998−2005) (initial date indicates first time elected as Division member). The list of the other Division members can be found in <http://www.iupac.org/divisions/III/members.html>. Membership of the Sub Committee on Photochemistry (2003−2005) was as follows: S. E. Braslavsky (Germany, Chairperson), A. U. Acuña (Spain), T. D. Z. Atvars (Brazil), C. Bohne (Canada), R. Bonneau (France), A. M. Braun (Germany), A. Chibisov (Russia), K. Ghiggino (Australia), A. Kutateladze (USA), H. Lemmetyinen (Finnland), M. Litter (Argentina), H. Miyasaka (Japan), M. Olivucci (Italy), D. Phillips (UK), R. O. Rahn (USA), E. San Román (Argentina), N. Serpone (Canada), M. Terazima (Japan). Contributors to the 3rd edition were: U. Acuña, F. Amat, D. Armesto, T. D. Z. Atvars, A. Bard, E. Bill, L. O. Björn, C. Bohne, J. Bolton, R. Bonneau, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Chebi: a Database and Ontology for Chemical Entities of Biological Interest
    D344–D350 Nucleic Acids Research, 2008, Vol. 36, Database issue Published online 11 October 2007 doi:10.1093/nar/gkm791 ChEBI: a database and ontology for chemical entities of biological interest Kirill Degtyarenko1,*, Paula de Matos1, Marcus Ennis1, Janna Hastings1, Martin Zbinden1, Alan McNaught1, Rafael Alca´ ntara1, Michael Darsow1, Mickae¨ l Guedj1 and Michael Ashburner2 1European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD and 2Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK Received August 13, 2007; Revised September 14, 2007; Accepted September 17, 2007 ABSTRACT representation in databases is not a trivial task. Most genetically encoded biomacromolecules are easily repre- Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) is sented as one-dimensional (1D) strings, while a two- a freely available dictionary of molecular entities dimensional (2D) sketch remains the most adequate focused on ‘small’ chemical compounds. The portrait of a ‘small molecule’. Several algorithms of molecular entities in question are either natural linear notation have been developed, e.g. SMILES (4). products or synthetic products used to intervene in However, linear notation, as for any other structural core the processes of living organisms. Genome- data, cannot be used in speech (and should not be used in encoded macromolecules (nucleic acids, proteins free text). Good annotation practice for biological and peptides derived from proteins by cleavage) are databases is to use either consistent and widely recognized not as a rule included in ChEBI. In addition to terminology or unique identifiers (to look up the molecule molecular entities, ChEBI contains groups (parts of of interest from a dedicated database) (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms Used in Medicinal Chemistry. Part II (IUPAC Recommendations 2013)*
    Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 85, No. 8, pp. 1725–1758, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/PAC-REC-12-11-23 © 2013 IUPAC, Publication date (Web): 29 July 2013 Glossary of terms used in medicinal chemistry. Part II (IUPAC Recommendations 2013)* Derek R. Buckle1,‡, Paul W. Erhardt2, C. Robin Ganellin3, Toshi Kobayashi4, Thomas J. Perun5, John Proudfoot6, and Joerg Senn-Bilfinger7 1DRB Associates, 18 Hillfield Road, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 4AP, UK; 2University of Toledo, College of Pharmacy, Center for Drug Design and Development, 2801 West Bancroft Street, Toledo, OH 43606-3390, USA; 3Department of Chemistry, Christopher Ingold Laboratory, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0AJ, UK; 4PhRMA, 4th Floor, Landic II Toranomon Building, 3-7-8 Minato-ku, 105-000 Japan; 547731 Old Houston Highway, Hempstead, TX 77445, USA; 6Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 900 Ridgebury Road, P.O. Box 368, Ridgefield, CT 06877, USA; 7Altana Pharma AG, Byk-Gulden Str. 2, D-78467 Konstanz, Germany Abstract: The evolution that has taken place in medicinal chemistry practice as a result of major advances in genomics and molecular biology arising from the Human Genome Project has carried with it an extensive additional working vocabulary that has become both inte- grated and essential terminology for the medicinal chemist. Some of this augmented termi- nology has been adopted from the many related and interlocked scientific disciplines with which the modern medicinal chemist must be conversant, but many other terms have been introduced to define new concepts and ideas as they have arisen. In this supplementary Glossary, we have attempted to collate and define many of the additional terms that are now considered to be essential components of the medicinal chemist’s expanded repertoire.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in De Novo Drug Design: from Conventional to Machine Learning Methods
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Advances in De Novo Drug Design: From Conventional to Machine Learning Methods Varnavas D. Mouchlis 1,* , Antreas Afantitis 1,* , Angela Serra 2,3 , Michele Fratello 2,3 , Anastasios G. Papadiamantis 1,4 , Vassilis Aidinis 5, Iseult Lynch 4 , Dario Greco 2,3,6,7 and Georgia Melagraki 8,* 1 Department of ChemoInformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1046, Cyprus; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland; angela.serra@tuni.fi (A.S.); michele.fratello@tuni.fi (M.F.); dario.greco@tuni.fi (D.G.) 3 BioMEdiTech Institute, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland 4 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; [email protected] 5 Institute for Bioinnovation, Biomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, Fleming 34, 16672 Athens, Greece; Aidinis@fleming.gr 6 Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland 7 Finnish Center for Alternative Methods (FICAM), Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland 8 Division of Physical Sciences & Applications, Hellenic Military Academy, 16672 Vari, Greece * Correspondence: [email protected] (V.D.M.); [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (G.M.) Abstract: De novo drug design is a computational approach that generates novel molecular structures Citation: Mouchlis, V.D.; Afantitis, from atomic building blocks with no a priori relationships. Conventional methods include structure- A.; Serra, A.; Fratello, M.; based and ligand-based design, which depend on the properties of the active site of a biological target Papadiamantis, A.G.; Aidinis, V.; or its known active binders, respectively. Artificial intelligence, including ma-chine learning, is an Lynch, I.; Greco, D.; Melagraki, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering 1
    FAO Glossary of RESEARCH AND biotechnology TECHNOLOGY and PAPER genetic engineering 7 A. Zaid H.G. Hughes E. Porceddu F. Nicholas Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 1999 – ii – The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations or the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ISBN: 92-5-104369-8 ISSN: 1020-0541 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. © FAO 1999 – iii – PREFACE Biotechnology is a general term used about a very broad field of study. According to the Convention on Biological Diversity, biotechnology means: “any technological application that uses biological systems, living organisms, or derivatives thereof, to make or modify products or processes for specific use.” Interpreted in this broad sense, the definition covers many of the tools and techniques that are commonplace today in agriculture and food production. If interpreted in a narrow sense to consider only the “new” DNA, molecular biology and reproductive technology, the definition covers a range of different technologies, including gene manipulation, gene transfer, DNA typing and cloning of mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Active Ingredient: the U.S
    Defining Active Ingredient: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Legal Interpretation of Regulatory Exclusivities December 10, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46110 SUMMARY R46110 Defining Active Ingredient: The U.S. Food and December 10, 2019 Drug Administration’s Legal Interpretation Erin H. Ward Legislative Attorney of Regulatory Exclusivities Whether many provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) apply to a particular drug product turns in part on the novelty of the “active ingredient” of the drug in question. In particular, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must assess the novelty of the active ingredient in a new drug, comparing it to a previously approved drug’s active ingredient to determine whether the new drug qualifies for the five-year “new chemical entity” (NCE) exclusivity. FDA generally cannot accept new drug applications that refer to a drug with NCE exclusivity (i.e., rely on its clinical data and FDA’s approval of the drug) for five years. Companies that receive approval for drugs with new active ingredients generally enjoy a competitive advantage in the market while the exclusivity is in effect—and after, depending how long it takes for generic versions to receive approval once applications can be submitted. Comparing active ingredients can be technically quite complicated. For instance, compounds in a final drug product may convert to other compounds through chemical reactions inside the body before arriving at the site of the therapeutic effect. In addition, related but distinct drug molecules may be clinically indistinguishable or convert into the same pharmacologically or physiologically active component inside the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms Used in Physical Organic Chemistry
    PUre & AppL. Chem,, Vol. 51, pp. 1725-1801. 0033-4545/79/0801-1725 $02.00/0 Pergamon Press Ltd. 1979. Printed in Great Britain. ©IUPAC PROVISIONAL INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY ORGANIC CHEMISTRY DIVISION COMMISSION ON PHYSICAL ORGANIC CHEMISTRY* GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN PHYSICAL ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Compiled and Edited by VICTOR GOLD Comments on these proposals should be sent within 8 months of Publication to the S=etary of the Commission: Dr. J. R. PENTON Technisch-Chenmches Laboratorium der EidgenOssischen Technischen Hochschule Zürich Universitlltstrasse 6 CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland Comments from the viewpoint of languages other than English are encouraged. These may have special significance regarding the eventual publication in various countries of translations of the nomenclature finally approved by IUPAC. *The mernbership of the Commission during the period in which this Glossary was prepared was as follows: J. F. DUNNETT (Titular Mernber, 1973-79; Chairman, 1978-; USA) A. R. H. COLE (Associate Member, 1974-79; Australia) V. GOLD (Titular Mernber, 1973·79; UK) R. D. GUTHRJE (Associate Mernber, 1977-81; USA) G.ILLUMINATI (Titular Mernber, 1977-81; ltaly) R. A. Y. JONES(AssociateMernber,l977-81; UK) J. MARCH(AssociateMernber,1977-81; USA) J. R. PENTON (Titular Mernber and Secretary, 1973·79; Switzerland) M. J. PERKINS (Titular Mernber, 1977-81; UK) J. REEDIJK (AssociateMernber,1977-81; Netherlands) C. RÜCHARDT (Titular Mernber, 1973-77; Federal Republic ofGermany) K. SCHWETLICK (Titular Mernber, 1977-81; German Dernocratic Republic) A. STREITWIESER(Titular Member, 1973-77; Associate Mernber, 1977-81; USA) J. TOUL!,l!C (TitularMernber,l973-79; France) H. ZOLLINGER (Titular Mernber, 1973-79; Chairman, 1973-78; Switzerland) CONTRIBUTORS TO THE GLOSSARY w.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Strategies for Searching Through Structure and Chemical
    Current strategies for searching through structure and chemical compound databases Grzegorz FIC*, Mariusz SKOMrA, Barbara DęBSKA – Faculty of Chemistry, rzeszow University of Technology, rzeszów, Poland Please cite as: CHEMIK 2016, 70, 8, 410–418 1. Introduction fulfil) and strategies of searching through databases. We pay special science • technique Modern databases which contain chemical compound structures attention to the newest solutions in this area, such as strategies are characterized by a large increase of information. Table 1 shows based on fuzzy substructures, 2D and 3D chemical similarity, the increase of data in Pubchem database over the last years. This ontology strategies, and structure-properties similarities. base originated in 2004 and is managed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) at the US National Institutes of 2. Strategies for searching through chemical compound Health (NIH). Currently, it has the largest free of charge dataset of databases chemical structures in the world. Pubchem consists of three bases Most generally, strategies which are currently used can be which contain information about small molecules (less than 1000 divided into: atoms and bonds). PubChem Substance contains information about 1. bibliographical, which use fields like: name, author, producer, substances (such as mixtures, extracts, and complex compounds) properties etc. from many other databases, PubChem Compound contains 2. structural, which use fields containing structural information information about chemical structures in PubChem Substance, and such as SMILES or MOL. In this category, several methods can be PubChem BioAssay contains information about screening results for distinguished: bioactivity (sets of tested substances are between one and several • searching for structures which are identical with the one hundred thousand).
    [Show full text]
  • A. Discuss Various Methods of Determining Reaction Mechanisms There Are a Number of Commonly Used Methods for Determining Mechanisms
    Model Answer –Key Adv Org Chem-MPharm (Pharm Chem )-SEM-I Q1 a Resonance stabilization b Opposite side attack in transistion phase intermediate and Walden inversion to be explained. c Steric hinderance d Charge delocalisation at these sites to be shown by resonance structures. e Elimination Unimolecular conjugate Base. Elimination refers to the fact that the mechanism is an elimination reaction and will lose two substituents. Unimolecular refers to the fact that the rate-determining step of this reaction only involves one molecular entity. Finally, conjugate base refers to the formation of the carbanion intermediate, which is the conjugate base of the starting material. f. Ozonolysis occurs at the double bond which ultimately breaks and leads to two products from which its location can be predicted. g.The free radical intermediate formed leads to anti-Markovnikkoffs rule. Q2 a. Discuss various methods of determining reaction mechanisms There are a number of commonly used methods for determining mechanisms. In most cases, one method is not sufficient and the problem is generally approached from several directions. Identification of Products Any mechanism proposed for a reaction must account for all the products obtained and their relative proportions. A proposed mechanism cannot be correct if it fails to predict the products in approximately the observed proportions. Determination of Prescence of an Intermediate 1. Isolation of an Intermediate: An intermediate can be isolated from a reaction mixture by stopping the reaction after a short time or by the use of very mild conditions. If the isolated compound gives the same product when subjected to the reaction conditions and at a rate no slower than the starting compound, this gives a strong evidence that the reaction involves that intermediate.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOSSARY of TERMS USED in PHOTOCHEMISTRY (IUPAC Recommendations 1996)
    Pure & Appl. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 12, pp. 2223-2286, 1996. Printed in Great Britain. Q 1996 IUPAC INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY ORGANIC CHEMISTRY DMSION COMMISSION ON PHOTOCHEMISTRY* GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN PHOTOCHEMISTRY (IUPAC Recommendations 1996) Prepared for publication by J. W. VERHOEVEN Labratoy of Organic Chemistry, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129, 1018 WS Amsterdam. Netherlands *Membership of the Commission during the period (1994-96) when the report was prepared was as follows: Chairman: J. D. Coyle (UK; 1991-95); J. R. Bolton (Canada; 1996-99); Secretary: R. Bonneau (France; 1989-96); Etular Members: J. D. Coyle (UK; 1991-97); F. D. Lewis (USA; 1994-97); I. Saito (Japan; 199497); F. Scandola (Italy; 199497); J. Wirz (Switzerland; 1991-99); Associate Members: A. U. Acuna Fernandez (Spain; 1996-99); D. R. Arnold (Canada; 1989-95); H.-D. B. Becker (Sweden; 1991-95); J. R. Bolton (Canada; 1994-97); H. Bouas-Laurent (France; 1996-99); V. Kuzmin (Russia; 1994-97); J. Mattay (Germany; 1991-97); E. A. San Roman (Argentina; 1987-95); E. Vrachnou-Dorier (Greece; 1996-97); National Representatives: C. Wentrup (Australia; 1996-97); F. C. De Schryver (Belgium; 1989-97); M. G. Neumann (Brazil; 1991-95); V. G. Toscano (Brazil; 1996-97); Y. Cao (Chinese Chemical Society; 1992-97); T. BCrczes (Hungary; 1985-97); M. V. George (India; 1994-95); G. Pandey (India; 1996-97); I Willner (Israel; 1989-97); S. J. Formosinho Sanches Simoes (Portugal; 1991-97); S. C. Shim (Korea; 1989-97); P. Hrdlovic (Slovakia; 1994-97); A. U. Acuna Fernandez (Spain; 1991-95); Y.
    [Show full text]