The Compatibility Or Incompatibility of Islam and Democracy: Implications for Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia and Algeria, 1980-2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Compatibility Or Incompatibility of Islam and Democracy: Implications for Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia and Algeria, 1980-2009 The Compatibility or Incompatibility of Islam and Democracy: Implications for Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia and Algeria, 1980-2009 Majid Takht Ravanchi Doctoral Thesis, Doctor rerum socialium The Faculty of the Business, Economics and Social Sciences of the University of Bern has on 16.12.2010 accepted the Thesis Proposed by First Expert: Prof. Dr. Wolf Linder Second Expert: Prof. Dr. Adrian Vatter February 2010 Bern Originaldokument gespeichert auf dem Webserver der Universitätsbibliothek Bern Dieses Werk ist unter einem Creative Commons Namensnennung-Keine kommerzielle Nutzung-Keine Bearbeitung 2.5 Schweiz Lizenzvertrag lizenziert. Um die Lizenz anzusehen, gehen Sie bitte zu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ch/ oder schicken Sie einen Brief an Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105, USA. 1 Urheberrechtlicher Hinweis Dieses Dokument steht unter einer Lizenz der Creative Commons Namensnennung-Keine kommerzielle Nutzung-Keine Bearbeitung 2.5 Schweiz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ch/ Sie dürfen: dies es Werk vervielfältigen, verbreiten und öffentlich zugänglich machen Zu den folgenden Bedingungen: Namensnennung. Sie müssen den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen (wodurch aber nicht der Eindruck entstehen darf, Sie oder die Nutzung des Werkes durch Sie würden entlohnt). Keine kommerzielle Nutzung. Dieses Werk darf nicht für kommerzielle Zwecke verwendet werden. Keine Bearbeitung. Dieses Werk darf nicht bearbeitet oder in anderer Weise verändert werden. Im Falle einer Verbreitung müssen Sie anderen die Lizenzbedingungen, unter welche dieses Werk fällt, mitteilen. Jede der vorgenannten Bedingungen kann aufgehoben werden, sofern Sie die Einwilligung des Rechteinhabers dazu erhalten. Diese Lizenz lässt die Urheberpersönlichkeitsrechte nach Schweizer Recht unberührt. Eine ausführliche Fassung des Lizenzvertrags befindet sich unter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ch/legalcode.de 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the support provided by the Department of Political Science of the University of Bern for the completion of this thesis. I also wish to express my appreciations to Professor Wolf Linder for his encouragement, inputs and guidance throughout the entire work on this thesis. His timely suggestions and corrections have undoubtedly improved the text. Special thanks go to Monika Spinatsch for her assistance in arranging communications, in person or through emails, with Professor Linder. Last but not least, I want to express gratitude to my wife and my two sons for their patience and support throughout days and nights spent on this thesis, without which this work could not have been completed. Tehran, February 2010 Majid Takht Ravanchi 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………...........12 1.1 Purpose and Objective………………………………………………….......... 14 1.2 Literature Review………………………………………………………......... 15 1.3 Research method………………………………………………………...........16 1.4 Principal Question……………………………………………………….........18 1.5 Important Questions……………………………………………………..........18 1.6 Hypothesis……………………………………………………………….........21 2 BASIC DEFINITIONS ON DEMOCRACY AND ISLAM………………........24 2.1 Democracy………………………………………………………………........24 2.2 Islam……………………………………………………………………..........25 2.3 Different Readings of Islam……………………………………………..........29 2.4 Ideological Tendencies within Islam…………………………………............31 2.5 Islam and Constitutionalism…………………………………………..............32 2.6 Islamic Democracy……………………………………………………............33 2.7 Question of Compatibility of Islam and Democracy.........................................34 2.8 Question of Incompatibility of Islam and Democracy......................................36 3 SECULARISM……………………………………………………………............39 3.1 Democracy and Secularism……………………………………………...........39 3.1.1 Definition of Secularism…………………………………………...........39 3.1.2 Origin of Secularism……………………………………………….........40 3.1.3 Separation of Religion from Politics……………………………….........41 3.1.4 Reasons for Separation……………………………………………..........42 3.1.5 Problems with Secularism………………………………………….........42 3.2 Islam and Secularism……………………………………………………........43 3.2.1 Religious Democracy………………………………………………........44 3.2.2 Islam's Objectives…………………………………………………..........45 3.2.3 Islam's characteristics………………………………………………........45 3.2.4 Need for an Islamic Government……………………………..................46 3.3 Conclusion……………………………………………………………….........48 4 HUMAN RIGHTS…………………………………………………………...........53 4.1 Democracy and Human Rights…………………………………………..........53 4.1.1 Definition of Human Rights………………………………………..........53 4.1.2 Western Philosophers and human Rights..................................................54 4.1.2.1 Aristotle.............................................................................................54 4.1.2.2 Aquinas………………………………………….............................54 4.1.2.3 Hobbes………………………..........................................................55 4.1.2.3 Locke………………………….........................................................57 4 4.1.2.4 Rousseau…………………………...................................................59 4.1.2.5 Kant…………………………...........................................................60 4.1.3 Contemporary Human Rights Instruments……………………...............61 4.1.4 Link……………………………………………………………...............62 4.2 Islam and Human Rights…………………………………………………......63 4.2.1 Purpose of Human Creation……………………………………….........63 4.2.2 Human Categories…………………………………………………........64 4.2.3 Dignity……………………………………………………………..........64 4.2.4 Sanctity of Rights……………………………………………………......65 4.2.5. Role of Society…………………………………………………….........66 4.2.6 Equality…………………………………………………………….........66 4.2.7 No Compulsion in Religion…………………………………………......67 4.2.8 Freedom……………………………………………………………........68 4.2.9 Slavery………………………………………………………………......71 4.2.10 Justice……………………………………………………………… ....71 4.2.11 Right to Life………………………………………………………........72 4.2.12 Right to Property…………………………………………………... .....72 4.2.13 Privacy……………………………………………………………... ....73 4.3 Conclusion………………………………………………………………... ....73 5 WOMEN………………………………………………………………………......79 5.1 Democracy and Women………………………………………………….. ....79 5.1.1 Western Philosophers and Women………………………………….. ....79 5.1.2 Problems with Exclusion……………………………………………. ....80 5.1.3 Feminism……………………………………………………………. ....81 5.1.4 United Nations Activities…………………………………………… ....82 5.2 Islam and Women……………………………………………………….........83 5.2.1 Message of Islam……………………………………………………......83 5.2.2 Koran and Women…………………………………………………........83 5.2.3 Complimentarity…………………………………………………….......85 5.2.4 Differences between Man and Woman…………………………….........85 5.2.5 Equality…………………………………………………………….........87 5.2.6 Misperceptions………………………………………………………......87 5.2.6.1 Guardianship………………………………………………….........87 5.2.6.2 Evidence………………………………………………………........89 5.2.6.3 Divorce………………………………………………………..........89 5.2.6.4 Polygamy……………………………………………………….......90 5.2.6.5 Inheritance…………………………………………………….........90 5.3 Conclusion……………………………………………………………….........91 6 PARLIAMENT……………………………………………………………….......95 6.1 Democracy and Parliament……………………………………………….......95 6.1.1 History of Assemblies……………………………………………….......95 6.1.2 Problems of Assemblies……………………………………………........96 6.1.3 United Kingdom Parliament……………………………………….........97 6.1.4 Representative Democracy………………………………………….......98 6.1.5 Representative or Direct Democracy………………………………........100 6.2 Islam and Shura………………………………………………………….......101 6.2.1 Meaning of Shura……………………………………………………....101 6.2.2 Characteristics of Shura……………………………………………......102 6.2.3 History of Shura…………………………………………………..........102 6.2.4 Shura and Elections………………………………………………….....103 5 6.2.5 Is Shura Obligatory?...............................................................................104 6.2.6 Who is Consulted and How?..................................................................104 6.2.7 Shura's Tasks……………………………………………………...........105 6.2.8 Shura and Democracy……………………………………………….....107 6.3 Conclusion……………………………………………………………….......108 7 TURKEY………………………………………………………………………...113 7.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………....113 7.2 Modern Turkey………………………………………………………...........114 7.3 Turkish Military………………………………………………………..........115 7.4 Secularism……………………………………………………………….......115 7.5 Human Rights………………………………………………………….........119 7.5.1 Religious Minorities………………………………………………........120 7.5.2 Islamists…………………………………………………………….......121 7.5.3 Kurds……………………………………………………………….......122 7.5.4 Reforms…………………………………………………………….......122 7.6 Women……………………………………………………………………....124 7.6.1 Individualism………………………………………………………......125 7.6.2 Equality………………………………………………………………...126 7.6.3 Domestic Violence…………………………………………………......126 7.6.4 Women and Secularism…………………………………………….......127 7.6.5 Legal Status of Women…………………………………………….......128 7.6.6 Road Ahead…………………………………………………………....129 7.7 Parliament………………………………………………………………......129 7.8 Islamist Parties……………………………………………………………...131 7.9 Conclusion……………………………………………………………….....134 8 SAUDI ARABIA………………………………………………………………...142 8.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………….....142 8.2 Wahhabism………………………………………………………………......143 8.3 Religious Legitimacy……………………………………………………......145 8.4 Secularism…………………………………………………………………...147 8.5 Royal Family………………………………………………………………...149 8.6 Opposition…………………………………………………………………...151 8.6.1 Sunni Opposition…………………………………………………….....151 8.6.2 Shi'ite
Recommended publications
  • The Populist Backlash Against Europe : Why Only Alternative Economic and Social Policies Can Stop the Rise of Populism in Europe
    This is a repository copy of The populist backlash against Europe : why only alternative economic and social policies can stop the rise of populism in Europe. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/142119/ Version: Accepted Version Book Section: Bugaric, B. (2020) The populist backlash against Europe : why only alternative economic and social policies can stop the rise of populism in Europe. In: Bignami, F., (ed.) EU Law in Populist Times : Crises and Prospects. Cambridge University Press , pp. 477-504. ISBN 9781108485081 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108755641 © 2020 Francesca Bignami. This is an author-produced version of a chapter subsequently published in EU Law in Populist Times. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. See: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108755641. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ The Populist Backlash Against Europe: Why Only Alternative Economic and Social Policies Can Stop the Rise of Populism in Europe Bojan Bugarič1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • A R a B I a N S
    LEBANON SYRIA ISRAEL/Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) EGYPT JORDAN IRAQ KUWAIT IRAN SAUDI ARABIA BAHRAIN QATAR U.A.E . OMAN YEMEN ARABIAN SEA Middle East and North Africa Preti Taneja n 2010, religious and ethnic minorities across Right: A woman cries over a coffin during the the Middle East and North Africa remained funeral for two Christian brothers killed in Mosul, I disproportionately affected by ongoing con- November 2010. Khalid al-Mousuly/Reuters. flict, political turmoil and state-sanctioned repres- sion of their rights. country widely regarded as one of the most stable Though Iraqi parliamentary elections were held in the region. In November 2009, King Abdullah in March 2010, the government was not formed II dissolved a parliament that had only served until November. In this political vacuum, which two years of its four-year term. Elections were also saw the end of US combat operations in the due to follow swiftly, but were postponed for the country, violence against minority groups escalated. drafting of a new electoral law, and the country In February, attacks in Mosul over ten days left reverted to direct royal rule for a year-long period. eight Christians dead, according to Human Rights Despite protests that the new electoral law further Watch (HRW). In October, militants laid siege to marginalizes the country’s Palestinian population, Our Lady of Salvation Syriac Catholic Church in elections were finally held in November 2010, Baghdad, taking over 100 people hostage. Numbers but were boycotted by the country’s main Islamist of reported casualties vary. Amnesty International opposition group.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Statism and the Illusions of Citizenship Reflections on the Neutral State
    1 Philosophical Statism and the Illusions of Citizenship Reflections on the Neutral State Frank van Dun ∗ Is the welfare state neutral to personal morality? 1 In today's welfare states one can find numerous life-styles existing side by side. These indicate a wide scope for 'personal mo- ralities' 2, but do not prove that the welfare state is 'neutral' to them. Welfare states interfere in more or less onerous ways with the business of (private) life with police checks, administrative controls and a vast arsenal of regulatory, penal and/or fiscal regimes. Some of the regulations may be more or less reasonable attempts to minimise the risk of one person inflicting irreparable damage on others or their property, but a great many are not. It is not too difficult to see the hand of special (economic, ideological, even sectarian) interests in the bulk of the rules and regulations on the books. 3 The state's non-neutrality is often an unintended outcome, but not always. Officials introduce new regulations with proud declarations of their intention to enforce particular 'moral choices', to treat one thing as a 'merit good' and another as an evil. They also justify intrusive policies with blatantly paternalistic arguments—remember their promise, or was it threat, to take care of us "from the cradle to the grave"—, with self-congratulatory references to an unspecified 'responsibility of the government'. There is no more direct negation of the role of private mo- rality than the claim that one discharges one's own responsibility by depriving others of the opportunity to exercise theirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Statism with Freedom: Turkey's Kurdish Opening
    Reconciling Statism with Freedom Turkey’s Kurdish Opening Halil M. Karaveli SILK ROAD PAPER October 2010 Reconciling Statism with Freedom Turkey’s Kurdish Opening Halil M. Karaveli © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodav. 2, Stockholm-Nacka 13130, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Reconciling Statism with Freedom: Turkey’s Kurdish Opening” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and ad- dresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse commu- nity of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lec- tures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public dis- cussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of the authors only, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Joint Center or its sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of Fascism
    The Rise and Fall of Fascism Michael Mann, Professor of Sociology, University of California at Los Angeles. E-mail: [email protected] Fascism was probably the most important political ideology created during the 20th century. In th e inter -war period it dominated half of Europe and threatened to overwhelm the other half. It also influenced many countries across the Middle East, Asia, Latin America and South Africa. In Asia, for example, its influence was probably strongest on the Chinese Kuomintang, Japanese militarists and Hindu nationalists. My book Fascists (Cambridge University Press, 2004) is based on research on fascists where they were strongest, in six European countries -- Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Romania and Spain. In the book I ask the question, why did fascism rise to such prominence? And I answer it looking at the men and women who became fascists: who were they, what did they believe in, and how did they act? There are two main schools of interpretation among scholars as to the rise of fascism. An idealist school has focused on fascists' beliefs and doctrines, emphasizing their nationalist values. Most recently, some of these scholars have termed fascism a form of “political religion”. 1 A more materialist school has focused on fascism’s supposed lower -middle class or middle class (petit bourgeois or bourgeois) base and the supposed way in which fascism was used to save capitalism when it was in difficulties. The debates between them constitute yet another replay of ongoing polemics between idealism and materialism in the social sciences. Both nationalism and class were important in fascism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fight for Democracy & Women's Rights in Algeria: A
    THE FIGHT FOR DEMOCRACY & WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN ALGERIA: A LONG LEGACY OF STRUGGLE The uprising that began in Algeria on 22 February 2019, was a watershed moment in the country’s 57-year history since independence. It reflects, among other things, the culmination of decades of struggle by two secular movements that have pushed against both the extremist Islamist tendencies in the country, but also against a regime that tried to contain and use the Islamists to its own advantage. The absence of an Islamist presence in the protests and the secular nature of the demands is notable, suggesting that the country has now entered what some call a post-Islamist era. This article explores what gave rise to these new tendencies. It first documents the demise of Islamist influences and shows how the current protests have their roots in two secular movements: the women’s movement and the Kabyle (Berber) movement, thus representing a fundamental shift in Algerian politics. Aili Mari Tripp* Spring 2019 * Aili Mari Tripp is the Wangari Maathai Professor of Political Science and Gender and Women’s Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Tripp is author of the forthcoming book Seeking Legitimacy: Why Arab Autocracies Adopt Women's Rights. Tripp is also co-director of the research project, Women and Peacebuilding in Africa, funded by the Norwegian Foreign Ministry and Carnegie Corporation of New York. 59 VOLUME 18 NUMBER 1 AILI MARI TRIPP he uprising that began in Algeria on 22 February 2019 is a water- shed moment in the country’s 57-year history since independence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Immoral Equivalent of War
    1 The Immoral Equivalent of War Deirdre Nansen McCloskey We are in a war, say all the presidents, the thoughtful and quasi-liberal presidents such as Emmanuel Macron in France and Moon Jae-in in Korea, as well as the thoughtless and quasi- fascist ones such as Donald Trump in the US and Viktor Orbán in Hungary. A terrible war. But the worst part is not the war itself against the disease and, as collateral damage, the crushing of the economy, wretched though they are. The worst part is the post-War likelihood of a triumphant statism, and then the fascism to which triumphant statism regularly gives rise. The disease is for 2020. The fascism is forever. The young historian Eliah Bures wrote six months ago a collective review in Foreign Affairs of books from left and right, books that all used prominently what he calls “the other F- word,” fascism. He notes that the word can be used foolishly, to mean “politics I don’t like.” Thus the “Anti-Fa,” that is, “Anti-Fascist,” movement of the loony left in the US. Bures is correct. But slipping into extremes of nationalism, socialism, racism, and the rest of the quicksand of the 1930s is not impossible. The 1930s, after all, happened. In the 1930s. Late in Bures’ essay, by way of a comforting conclusion from the apparent safety of November 2019, he pens a sentence that has acquired a terrifying salience: “Barring a crisis of capitalism and democratic representation on the scale of the 1920s and ’30s, there is no reason to expect today’s populism to revert to fascism.” Uh oh.
    [Show full text]
  • NCH Annual Report 2019
    Network of Concerned Historians NCH Annual Report 2019 http://www.concernedhistorians.org INTRODUCTION This twenty-fifth Annual Report of the Network of Concerned Historians (NCH) contains news about the domain where history and human rights intersect, in particular about the censorship of history and the persecution of historians, archivists, and archaeologists around the globe, as reported by various human rights organizations and other sources. It mainly covers events and developments of 2018 and 2019. Disclaimer. The fact that the NCH presents this news does not imply that it shares the views and beliefs of the historians and others mentioned in it. Download this report at: http://www.concernedhistorians.org/ar/19.pdf Cite this report as: Network of Concerned Historians, Annual Report 2019 (http://www.concernedhistorians.org/ar/19.pdf). For the complete set of NCH Annual Reports, see: http://www.concernedhistorians.org/content/ar.html Or click: 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 All Annual Reports (1995–2019) were compiled by Antoon De Baets. Please send any comments to [email protected] Network of Concerned Historians, Annual Report 2019 (2019) 2 ____________________________________________________________ AFGHANISTAN Previous Annual Report entries: 2000–2016, 2018. ALBANIA Previous Annual Report entries: 1996, 2012, 2015−2018. In May 2019, after a legal challenge by BIRN Albania (Balkan Investigative Reporting Network Albania) initiated in March 2016, an appeals court ordered the declassification of annual reports compiled by the Communist-era secret service Sigurimi in 1980–1989 and statistics on the number of Albanians under its active surveillance in that period.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Faces of Fascism Sheri Berman
    B•• KS Sheri Berman is a visiting associate professor of political science at Barnard College, Columbia University, and the author of The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Ideological Dynamics of the Twentieth Century, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming. Three Faces of Fascism Sheri Berman Fascists Michael Mann New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004 The Anatomy of Fascism Robert O. Paxton New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2004 The Seduction of Unreason: The Intellectual Romance with Fascism from Nietzsche to Postmodernism Richard Wolin Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004 In recent decades, the term “fascism” has terpretations of fascism’s nature and histori- basically been stripped of all substantive cal significance, and their impressive books content. People on the left often apply the should interest academics and general read- “fascist” tag to describe any right-wing thug ers alike. Together they provide an excellent they don’t like, and their opposite numbers opportunity to assess what is and is not have reciprocated with coinages such as known about fascism, as well as the rele- “feminazi” and “econazi.” Academics have vance of the topic for contemporary political been less glib, but even they have fought life. In particular, we will see that while passionately over how to characterize and old-style fascism is defunct in its original even analyze the phenomenon. Almost 85 home—Europe—its spirit lives on in years since fascism’s appearance and almost another part of the world in the guise of 60 years since its demise, reams of books radical Islam. about it still appear regularly, their authors Robert Paxton’s The Anatomy of Fascism often disagreeing sharply with one another is the most comprehensive of the three.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutionalising Political Parties in Britain
    Constitutionalising Political Parties in Britain Jongcheol Kim Department of Law London School of Economics and Political Science UMI Number: U117335 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U117335 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Constitutionalising Political Parties in Britain A Thesis Submitted to the University of London for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Jongcheol Kim (LL.B., LL.M.) Department of Law London School of Economics and Political Science 1998 S F 75S2 70/43Z Preface When almost five years ago I came to London to study British public law, I had no specific topic in mind that might form the basis for my Ph.D. course. I came with no particular background in British law, but having studied American constitutional law, the oldest written constitution in the modem world, I have decided it would be of considerable interest to further my understanding of modem constitutionalism by looking at the oldest example of an unwritten constitution. My knowledge of British public law was, then, extremely shallow and came almost exclusively from translating into Korean A.V.Dicey’s classic work,An Introduction to the Law o f the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Formation and Patronage Networks: a Comparative Analysis of Berber-State
    State-Formation and Patronage Networks: A comparative analysis of Berber-State relations in Morocco and Algeria Sihem Attalah Political Science Department McGill University Montreal, Quebec October 2019 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts © Attalah, 2019 2 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 3 ABSTRACT This article seeks to account for the different relationships between the central government and Berber populations in Morocco and Algeria—The first case being largely integrative and the other frequently conflictual. Through a comparative historical analysis, it highlights the dual importance of the legacies of French colonial rule on one hand, and post-colonial configurations of political power on the other. Both variables were essential in shaping the extent and the composition of power networks in Morocco and Algeria, which defined the relationship Berber communities had with the central authority. EXTRAIT Cet article vise à interroger les relations entre populations berbères et gouvernement central marocain d'une part et gouvernement central algérien d'autre part. Si dans le cas du Maroc, la stratégie employée se montre portée sur l’intégration, l'approche algérienne se révèle beaucoup plus conflictuelle. Cette analyse historique comparative a pour objectif de mettre en lumière l'importance de l'héritage colonial français, tout comme celle de l'architecture du pouvoir politique contemporain. Ces deux variables ont déterminé la portée et la composition des réseaux de pouvoir au Maroc et en Algérie, ce qui a eu pour effet de façonner les relations des communautés berbères avec le gouvernement. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would not have been possible without the help and patience of my supervisor Rex Brynen, and for that I am very thankful.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity in Algeria
    Algeria Ethnicity in Algeria Group selection The Arabs (72%) and Berbers (or: Amazigh) (28%) are politically relevant ethnic groups in Algeria. Power relations Algeria gained independence from France in 1962 following a war that lasted for nearly a decade. The anti-colonial nationalism which fueled the struggle for Algerian independence had developed in tan- dem with the rise of Arab nationalism. Thus, similar to other newly independent North African states, Algerian identity was “generally defined by nationalist orthodoxy as Arabo-Muslim” (37). The Na- 37 [International Crisis Group, 2003] tional Liberation Front (FLN), the country’s primary political party, was established in 1954 as part of the struggle for independence and has since largely dominated politics. The FLN has legitimized their power by propagating the vision of a unified Arab-Muslim nation. In 1962 Ait Ahmed founded the Socialist Forces Front (Front des forces socialistes, FFS) in an effort to challenge the hegemony of the FLN in the country’s one party system. Although Ait Ahmed was Berber, his primary goal was a power sharing structure for the new state, not to advance his ethnic group’s rights. Many members of the 1962 constituent assembly (one-party, FLN) were Berber and over half opposed Ait Ahmed and the FFS, highlighting that politics were not primarily defined by ethnic divides. Algeria does not have a ‘Berber party’ which appeals to Algeria’s Berbers per definition. However, it can be said that the Berber vision of the nation was excluded from post-independence nation- building, leading to a greater consciousness of Berber identity and resentment against the lack of its recognition in national politics.
    [Show full text]