Map Extent 13 17 16 Grandrond E Tribal Eland S 8 9 10 11 Eola Village

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Map Extent 13 17 16 Grandrond E Tribal Eland S 8 9 10 11 Eola Village D R L D A N O Travel Management D C 2 29 28 27 30 29 1 6 M Braun 28 1 31 32 33 31 32 6 5 4 3 34 35 36 31 32 33 33 33 34 35 Long Mountain Area 2 36 Tater Hill 12 1 SADDLE MTN MANAGEMENT 31 32 ClatsopCounty 36 SADDLE MTN 34 35 36 31 32 33 D 35 ColumCounty bia 34 7 11 6 11 6 5 4 4 N T. 12 R 3 2 5 4 Wildlife Management 7 8 1 TillamookCounty UNIT MANAGEMENT 6 5 4 3 2 1 3 2 1 6 5 4 K 3 2 12 1 6 5 Wash ing tonCounty R Sunset Highway Forest Wayside 4 3 2 1 6 5 9 10 4 3 18 O 10 Unit UNIT 10 7 11 7 8 8 17 15 14 F 11 12 9 18 God's Valley Salmonberry 7 8 9 12 17 10 Hoffman Hill H 13 16 14 13 11 12 Coyote Corner 7 8 26 Sunset Camp Neahkahnie 15 9 ¤£ 7 8 PrivateCooperators 19 T FOSS RD 10 11 12 9 10 11 12 7 !!!!!!!!! Mountain R 8 9 10 17 16 20 Wildlife Area 18 17 !!!!!!!!! 21 O 18 18 17 22 23 15 14 13 16 15 Tophill 24 14 !!!!!!!!! N 19 Wakefield 16 13 18 Giustina Land & Timber 20 Belfort 15 14 13 17 21 Green Mountain !!!!!!!!! 22 16 23 24 15 14 13 18 17 16 Neahkahnie 15 14 13 !!!!!!!!! Beach Manzanita 18 17 16 15 29 28 27 !Nehalem 19 20 19 20 Company P! P 21 22 23 24 21 22 !!!!!!!!! 19 Enright 23 26 25 20 22 24 19 27 30 29 21 23 24 20 L.L "Stub" !!!!!!!!! 28 27 21 26 25 22 23 19 24 20 21 22 23 20 !!!!!!!!! Mohler Stewart State 24 19 21 22 T. 3 N T. Æ 34 34 Ä !!!!!!!!! 33 Hampton 35 30 Timber 32 29 28 30 Scofield Park Snooseville Corner !!!!!!!!! 36 31 27 26 29 28 25 30 29 27 26 29 28 N 28 27 26 25 30 26 !!!!!!!!! 32 25 W 25 28 27 25 30 SouthPortion 53 Nehalem Junction 33 34 35 !!!!!!!!! Westimber 27 26 30 4 36 T 29 3 33 Strassel 29 28 !!!!!!!!! Belding I 27 5 M 31 Buck Mountain !!!!!!!!! Wheeler 32 35 36 31 SCAPPOOSE Hancock 35 Belding Point Mayo B Red Slide Hill 2 High Butte 36 31 32 Cochran 32 33 E 35 !!!!!!!!! 4 P! 1 34 34 35 31 32 33 36 34 3 6 33 34 R !!!!!!!!! 5 Reeher 36 31 4 3 32 MANAGEMENT UNIT 2 R !!!!!!!!! County Line 34 35 31 32 33 1 33 36 34 L&C Oregon Timber Forest D !!!!!!!!! 6 Brighton 5 4 8 9 3 2 6 5 !!!!!!!!! 10 1 6 5 4 4 3 11 3 2 2 1 Park Æ 12 1 6 Ä Free Permits Required: 7 5 4 !!!!!!!!! 3 2 4 1 6 5 D 2 Meacham Corner Highways 8 Round Top Buxton 1 greenwoodresources.com 17 6 5 4 3 !!!!!!!!! 9 3 R 10 11 12 7 9 47 8 9 !!!!!!!!! 16 10 11 7 Eagle Peak 15 12 7 8 10 8 9 Y 11 12 10 11 !!!!!!!!! 17 14 Rogers Peak 12 7 8 13 9 10 E 11 12 !!!!!!!!! 7 8 11 Stimson 18 9 10 Foley Peak 12 Major Roads L 7 !!!!!!!!! 17 8 9 10 Nedonna Beach 16 14 13 18 Larch Mountain O 15 17 Wildcat Mountain Manning !!!!!!!!! 20 16 21 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 18 17 16 !!!!!!!!! 22 F 14 13 15 14 13 18 17 24 I 16 !!!!!!!!! 23 15 14 13 Other Roads 20 18 19 17 16 15 14 13 !!!!!!!!! Weyerhaeuser Included M Crag Mountain Gales Creek 18 17 16 Manhattan Beach 24 Glenwood 15 Æ !!!!!!!!! Barnesdale 21 22 23 19 20 21 23 Ä A 22 20 21 29 I 24 19 Forest Park !!!!!!!!! 28 22 19 20 P! 23 24 21 22 Camp Mountaindale 27 23 24 19 20 Hayward in TMA M 21 22 26 23 24 19 47 25 30 WILSON MANAGEMENT UNIT 20 21 22 23 19 Weyerhaeuser Lease/Permit Areas are Not 29 27 26 25 20 21 22 2 N T. 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 24 Rockaway 30 29 28 32 Triangulation Point 27 26 30 29 Included in the TMA, For Current Status: 33 25 28 27 34 26 25 30 29 P! 28 27 35 36 26 25 30 29 28 31 27 26 25 https://www.wyrecreationnw.com 32 30 29 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 Kings Mountain Mountaindale 34 35 36 28 27 31 32 33 34 5 35 36 31 32 Banks Æ Twin Rocks Ä 33 34 6 3 35 36 31 4 2 32 33 1 34 35 36 31 P! 31 32 34 FederalLand 32 33 34 6 35 36 1 6 5 Diamond Hill 5 6 33 5 4 3 2 4 3 2 1 Wilkesboro 6 5 4 26 8 3 1 6 Elk Creek Watseco Cedar Butte 4 3 Christie£ Lees Camp 2 ¤ 10 1 7 9 6 5 11 2 4 3 US Bureau of Land 12 Forest Park 2 1 4 6 3 5 7 Balm Grove 2 Vadis 12 7 8 9 10 5 4 Kansas City 6 16 8 9 10 11 11 12 9 3 18 Wolf Point 10 Hillside 1 Roy 8 9 Greenville 17 Barview 7 10 11 12 7 8 Management (BLM) 15 11 12 South Fork Camp 7 8 14 9 10 Green Hill 13 11 12 Gales Creek 18 7 8 17 9 10 11 Garibald 16 15 13 18 17 16 15 14 12 7 8 20 14 13 9 10 18 21 17 US Forest Service 16 15 13 18 17 P! 14 16 Woods Point 13 23 19 20 15 14 18 17 Æ 22 24 16 Ä 15 14 13 Kilchis 13 18 16 21 22 17 15 Doty Hill 23 19 14 Schefflin 24 20 21 22 23 18 17 16 Hobsonville River 24 19 20 8 Thatcher 15 21 22 23 24 19 20 27 21 22 23 24 26 Recreation Jordan Creek 19 Oth erCooperators 25 20 21 30 22 23 29 28 24 19 Area 30 Saddle Mountain 20 21 21 26 25 29 22 23 24 19 27 28 27 26 25 20 1 N T. 30 22 35 29 Bayocean 28 27 26 25 30 29 Verboort 34 32 28 27 26 25 30 OR Department of Forestry 31 29 28 Centerville Bay City 27 D 26 25 36 V E R R 34 35 Stanley Peak 30 29 Gales Peak I 32 27 26 36 31 33 34 35 Timbuktu 28 25 30 29 P! R 36 31 28 27 33 32 33 26 1 34 35 S 36 31 32 33 I 34 35 36 31 32 33 OR Dept of Fish and Wildlife Idaville H 5 34 35 Tillamook 4 36 31 33 3 2 1 32 33 32 34 2 K C 34 35 I L 6 36 31 Æ 6 Ä 11 Randall Hill 5 4 5 4 3 2 3 2 Forest Grove Cornelius 6 1 1 6 5 4 7 8 12 3 2 6 Bay 7 1 5 4 P! 3 8 2 1 P!8 9 6 5 5 Other State Lands Cape Meares 10 4 3 11 12 2 9 1 6 BAYOCEANDR Juno 4 3 13 7 8 9 Carnation 2 18 10 11 17 7 8 12 7 8 Tuttle Point 16 9 10 9 10 7 7 13 18 17 11 12 11 12 8 9 L 16 15 10 11 12 D 15 14 A 14 8 T R 9 10 IM LL 13 Hembre Lookout 11 12 14 ER R D SO IE 7 Detour 9 Oth erLand 23 E 16 10 S 18 17 Windy Point 8 11 16 R 19 M 17 15 14 18 O 20 21 IT 13 18 17 16 17 Pacific Ocean Pacific 15 Dilley Siskeyville 14 15 14 18 17 H 24 22 23 24 19 H R D 13 13 16 Blooming 20 21 15 14 Grande Ronde Tribal 13 S 22 18 Oceanside 16 15 25 23 24 Hagg 14 13 23 T 18 17 16 15 14 19 S 20 21 30 19 22 Tillamook 20 21 23 E 29 28 30 22 24 19 20 21 Roberts School Lands 27 23 22 19 Lake 26 24 23 24 20 25 27 26 W 29 E R R 21 22 23 24 Fern Hill P! P! 28 25 R IV D 19 K 21 22 101 Fairview S S T I MSON MAI NL I NE 20 23 24 A 19 20 1 S T. £T 21 22 ¤ 23 31 R 28 27 30 I Ginger Peak T 26 29 28 L 27 Happy Camp 31 30 26 25 Stimson Mill Other Public Land L 30 29 28 Seghers 32 34 25 27 35 A 26 30 36 Peninsula County Park 25 29 28 Spring Hill Netarts M 32 27 29 Æ Ä 33 29 26 25 30 33 34 35 28 6 O 36 31 27 26 25 30 29 O Gobblers Knob Cherry Grove 28 27 26 Trask County Park 34 34 5 K 31 32 33 35 36 32 33 35 Patton Other Private Land Not 4 131 34 35 32 33 31 36 R 34 35 6 E 2 36 31 32 Iowa Hill School 3 K 1 33 L I 5 O V 4 3 Wash ing tonCounty 36 31 32 FF 6 Gold Peak 33 34 33 34 E 2 1 Four Corners 35 Gaston R R L O N G P RAI RI E RD 31 32 in TMA D 36 35 R 6 5 Iowa Hill 7 8 6 5 4 4 3 D 3 2 2 1 4 P! 9 10 1 6 5 11 9 10 3 2 1 6 4 4 12 7 5 5 8 YamhCounty ill 1 2 6 ER CR 3 3 2 South Prairie N E Mount Richmond 1 Private Land Outside of 11 12 R E 6 Hollywood Camp TU K Laurelwood 3 2 17 7 18 8 9 10 7 8 R Dellwood 5 4 16 11 12 9 10 11 D 15 12 7 14 8 12 7 D 13 9 10 8 9 18 17 10 11 16 11 12 7 7 Chehalem TMA R 15 8 9 10 11 K 14 13 N 12 8 E Ginsberg Point W Wapato 9 Mountains 11 E 18 17 Edwards Butte 18 17 F 14 10 R 16 15 14 13 16 15 14 T 19 C 21 22 13 18 A U Y 23 17 15 14 13 I R 19 24 19 16 R 17 16 E 20 15 N 21 22 C 13 18 K 20 17 H E 16 15 S 23 24 18 I 14 13 Bald Peak I L R 18 17 16 19 15 14 H 20 D 21 22 19 C 23 20 21 20 22 23 24 C R 30 W 28 27 29 19 R 24 29 26 25 20 21 22 23 24 19 E 25 30 24 E 21 22 E 28 E 23 MUNSEN CR EEK RD K 19 20 Pleasant 27 K 21 22 Dewey Bald Peak 26 25 23 24 Trask Mountain R 19 20 21 2 S T.
Recommended publications
  • Protecting O&C Lands: Mount Hebo
    A fact sheet from Sept 2013 Bob Van Dyk Bob Van Dyk Bob Van Dyk Protecting O&C Lands Mount Hebo Location: Northern Oregon Coast Range Rising 3,175 feet from its densely forested surroundings, Mount Hebo is one of the highest peaks 11,310 Acres: in the northern Oregon Coast Range. The prominent Ecological value: Historical significance, lookout is a popular day hike for those willing to breathtaking vistas, hemlock and Douglas fir climb far above the massive hemlock and Douglas fir forests, and abundant wildflowers forest to fully experience the breathtaking scope of the Northwest’s landscape. Along the path, a traveler Economic value: Hiking and biking will find an abundance of towering trees and rare wildflowers. North of the mountain’s summit lies the last remaining roadless area in northwest Oregon, What are the O&C lands? providing a unique wild land experience in this part In 1866, Congress established a land-grant program for the Oregon of the state. This area should be forever protected & California (O&C) Railroad Co. to spur the completion of the as wilderness. rail line between Portland and San Francisco that required the company to sell the deeded land to settlers. Forty years later, when Pioneers dubbed the peak “Heave Ho” because of the the company failed to meet the terms of the agreement fully, the way it seemed to erupt from the surrounding forest. federal government reclaimed more than 2 million acres of mostly Over the years, the name “Heave Ho” morphed into forested land. Today, those O&C lands remain undeveloped and “Hebo.” These explorers discovered what Native are administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Cascade Head Area, Northwestern Oregon Coast Range (Neskowin, Nestucca Bay, Hebo, and Dolph 7.5 Minute Quadrangles)
    (a-0g) R ago (na. 96-53 14. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR , U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Alatzi2/6 (Of (c,c) - R qo rite 6/6-53y Geologic Map of the Cascade Head Area, Northwestern Oregon Coast Range (Neskowin, Nestucca Bay, Hebo, and Dolph 7.5 minute Quadrangles) by Parke D. Snavely, Jr.', Alan Niem 2 , Florence L. Wong', Norman S. MacLeod 3, and Tracy K. Calhoun 4 with major contributions by Diane L. Minasian' and Wendy Niem2 Open File Report 96-0534 1996 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American stratigraphic code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1/ U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025 2/ Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97403 3/ Consultant, Vancouver, WA 98664 4/ U.S. Forest Service, Corvallis, OR 97339 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 GEOLOGIC SKETCH 2 DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS SURFICIAL DEPOSITS 7 BEDROCK UNITS Sedimentary and Volcanic Rocks 8 Intrusive Rocks 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 15 REFERENCES CITED 15 MAP SHEETS Geologic Map of the Cascade Head Area, Northwestern Oregon Coast Range, scale 1:24,000, 2 sheets. Geologic Map of the Cascade Head Area, Northwest Oregon Coast Range (Neskowin, Nestucca Bay, Hebo, and Dolph 7.5 minute Quadrangles) by Parke D. Snavely, Jr., Alan Niem, Florence L. Wong, Norman S. MacLeod, and Tracy K. Calhoun with major contributions by Diane L. Minasian and Wendy Niem INTRODUCTION The geology of the Cascade Head (W.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Silverspot Recovery Plan
    PART I INTRODUCTION Overview The Oregon silverspot butterfly (Speyeria zerene hippolyta) is a small, darkly marked coastal subspecies of the Zerene fritillary, a widespread butterfly species in montane western North America. The historical range of the subspecies extends from Westport, Grays Harbor County, Washington, south to Del Norte County, California. Within its range, the butterfly is known to have been extirpated from at least 11 colonies (2 in Washington, 8 in Oregon, and 1 in California). We, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, listed the Oregon silverspot butterfly was listed as a threatened species with critical habitat in 1980 (USDI 1980; 45 FR 44935). We completed a recovery plan for this species in 1982 (USDI 1982). The species recovery priority number is 3, indicating a high degree of threat and high recovery potential (USDI 1983; 48 FR 43098). At the time of listing, the only viable population known was at Rock Creek-Big Creek in Lane County, Oregon, and was managed by the U.S. Forest Service (Siuslaw National Forest). The Siuslaw National Forest developed an implementation plan (Clady and Parsons 1984) to guide management of the species at Rock Creek-Big Creek and Mount Hebo (Mt. Hebo) in Tillamook County, Oregon. Additional Oregon silverspot butterfly populations were discovered at Cascade Head, Bray Point, and Clatsop Plains in Oregon, on the Long Beach Peninsula in Washington, and in Del Norte County in California. The probability of survival of four populations has been increased by management efforts of the Siuslaw National Forest and The Nature Conservancy, however, some threats to the species remain at all of the sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Trask River CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS
    Trask River CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................14 Trask Landscape Setting ..............................................................................................15 Trask Physical Setting ..................................................................................................16 Geology......................................................................................................................... 17 Geomorphology............................................................................................................... 19 Stream Channel Morphology............................................................................................... 21 Soils .............................................................................................................................. 24 Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................................ 26 Climate..........................................................................................................................................26 Daily Flows for Trask and Rock Creeks .................................................................................................26 Peak flows ......................................................................................................................................26 Water Quality: Temperature ................................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Trask River Watershed Analysis
    Trask River Watershed Analysis TRASK RIVER WATERSHED ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT AUGUST 2003 A Report by E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc. P.O. Box 609 Corvallis, OR 97339 Kai U. Snyder Timothy J. Sullivan Deian L. Moore Richard B. Raymond Erin H. Gilbert Submitted to Oregon Department of Forestry and U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management John Hawksworth, Project Manager Trask River Watershed Analysis ii Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... x LIST OF TABLES......................................................................................................................xii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .........................................................................................................xiv CHAPTER 1. CHARACTERIZATION...................................................................................1-1 1.1 Physical ........................................................................................................1-1 1.1.1 Size and Setting ..........................................................................................1-1 1.1.2 Topography.................................................................................................1-1 1.1.3 Ecoregions..................................................................................................1-3 1.1.4 Geology and Geomorphology.....................................................................1-3 1.1.5 Soils ........................................................................................................1-5
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F.3 Scenic Features in Study Area
    Population data for Study Area and individual counties (1980, 1990, 1993) Sources: 1) Center for Population Research and Census, Portland State University, 1994. 2) Oregon Census Abstract, Oregon Housing and Community Services Department, 1993. 1990: Oregon contained 1.1% of U.S. population 1990: 9-county area contained 36% of Oregon population ~ 'd (1) ::s 0...... (10 years) (3 years) >: Apr-80 Apr-90 Jul-93 80-90 90-93 t'%j County Census Census Est. Pop % Increase % Increase ...... Tillamook 21,164 21,670 22,900 1.9% 6.2% Inc. 7,892 7,969 8,505 1.0% 6.7% Uninc. 13,272 13,601 14,395 2.6% 6.8% Washington 245,860 311,654 351,000 26.7% 12.7% Inc. 105,162 162,544 180,344 64.6% 11.0% Uninc. 140,698 149,010 170,656 5.9% 14.5% Yamhill 55,332 65,551 70,900 18.5% 8.2% Inc. 34,840 43,965 48,161 26.2% 9.5% Uninc. 20,492 21,586 22,739 5.3% 5.3% Polk 45,203 49,541 53,600 9.6% 8.2% Inc. 30,054 34,310 36,554 14.2% 6.5% Uninc. 15,149 15,231 17,046 0.5% 11.9% lincoln 35,264 38,889 40,000 10.3% 2.9% Inc. 19,619 21,493 22,690 9.6% 5.6% Uninc. 15,645 17,396 17,310 11.2% -0.5% Benton 68,211 70,811 73,300 3.8% 3.5% Inc. 44,640 48,757 54,220 9.2% 11.2% Uninc.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower South Yamhill-Deer Creek Watershed Assessment
    Yamhill Basin Council September 20, 2000 Lower South Yamhill-Deer Creek Watershed Assessment - 1 - Funding for the Lower S. Yamhill-Deer Creek Watershed Assessment was provided by the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) and Resource Assistance for Rural Environments (RARE) Lower S. Yamhill-Deer Creek Watershed Project Manager: Denise Hoffert-Hay, Author Contributors: Dave Hanson, local resident and writer, assisted with historic vegetation and conditions. Liz Gifford, Linfield College intern, assisted with Channel Habitat Types. Robert Grover, Linfield College intern, assisted with fish research. Editor: Melissa Leoni Acknowledgements Many people gave their time and talents to assist in the completion of this document. Where actual written material was used, it is noted in the document. Many people assisted me with learning the computer or analytical techniques needed to complete different sections of the assessment. Others gave me stories of this place they call home. Any errors or omissions are not intentional and are my own. (In no particular order) Robert Grover, Linfield College Graduate Liz Gifford, Linfield College Graduate Gary Galovich, Fish Biologist, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Al White, Oregon Watersheds. Ryan Dalton, GIS Coordinator, Bureau of Land Management Willamette/North Coast Providence Bill Gille, Public Works Department, Yamhill County Dave Carter, Roadmaster, Yamhill County Robert Bower, former Watershed Assessment Project Manager, Yamhill Basin Council Dave Hanson, local watershed resident Glen
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions-I
    Oregon Conservation Strategy 2016: Ecoregions-i Table of Contents – Chapter 3: Ecoregions ECOREGIONS ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 BLUE MOUNTAINS ................................................................................................................................................ 3 COAST RANGE ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 COLUMBIA PLATEAU .......................................................................................................................................... 21 EAST CASCADES .................................................................................................................................................. 27 KLAMATH MOUNTAINS ..................................................................................................................................... 36 NORTHERN BASIN AND RANGE ......................................................................................................................... 47 WEST CASCADES ................................................................................................................................................. 58 WILLAMETTE VALLEY ......................................................................................................................................... 67 NEARSHORE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of the Yamhill Area, Oregon by George E
    This is a scanned version of the text of the original Soil Survey report of Yamhill County, Oregon, issued January 1974. Original tables and maps were deleted. There may be references in the text that refer to a table that is not in this document. Updated tables were generated from the NRCS National Soil Information System (NASIS). The soil map data has been digitized and may include some updated information. These are available from http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov. Please contact the State Soil Scientist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) for additional information. SOIL SURVEY OF THE YAMHILL AREA, OREGON BY GEORGE E. OTTE, DUANE K. SETNESS, WALTER A. ANDERSON, FRED J. HERBERT, JR., AND CLARENCE A. KNEZEVICH, SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE, IN COOPERATION WITH THE OREGON AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION THE YAMHILL AREA consists of all of Yamhill County, except In mapping the survey area, two intensities of soil mapping for the extreme western part that is in the Siuslaw National Forest. were used. In the forested-hilly or mountainous part of the survey It is located on the west side of the lower middle part of the area, soils were examined at moderate to wide intervals and were Willamette Valley (fig. 1) and is bounded by Washington, mapped at medium intensity. In the smooth Willamette Valley part, Clackamas, Polk, the soils were examined at close intervals and were mapped at high intensity, or in considerably more detail than in the forested-hilly or mountainous part. Most of the soils mapped at high intensity have a narrow range of slope.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profile
    Section 2: Community Profile Why Plan for Natural Hazards in Yamhill County? ....................................... 2 History of Natural Hazards in Yamhill County .............................................. 2 Geography and Environment....................................................................... 3 Rivers and Streams ............................................................................... 4 Climate .................................................................................................. 7 Minerals and Soils ................................................................................. 8 Significant Geological Factors ............................................................... 8 Population and Demographics..................................................................... 9 Land and Development ............................................................................. 11 Development Regulations.................................................................... 12 Housing and Community Development ..................................................... 13 Employment and History ........................................................................... 13 Transportation and Commuting ................................................................. 14 Historic and Cultural Resources ................................................................ 15 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure............................................................ 15 Yamhill County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan: Community
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Tualatin Scoggins Watershed Analysis 2000
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Salem District Office Tillamook Resource Area 4610 Third Avenue Tillamook, OR 97141 February 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Upper Tualatin- Scoggins Watershed Analysis As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. BLM/OR/WA/PT-00/015+1792 i Upper Tualatin-Scoggins Watershed Analysis ii Upper Tualatin-Scoggins Watershed Analysis Washington County Soil and Water Conservation District J.T. Hawksworth, Principal Author U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT February 2000 iii Upper Tualatin-Scoggins Watershed Analysis iv Introduction The concept of watershed analysis is built on the premise that management and planning efforts are best addressed from the watershed perspective. Better decisions are made, and better actions taken, when watershed processes and other management activities within a watershed are taken into consideration. Issues related to erosion, hydrologic change, water quality, and species are not limited to a specific site.
    [Show full text]
  • WOPR Salem District Resource Management Plan
    Resource Management Plan 25 Salem District ROD and RMP 26 Resource Management Plan Resource Management Plan Planning Area The entire planning area analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Revision of the Resource Management Plans of the Western Oregon Bureau of Land Management (October 2008) includes all lands (private, local, state, and federal) in western Oregon. See Figure 1 (Entire planning area of the Western Oregon BLM resource management plan revisions). The Salem District Resource Management Plan and the coordinated resource management plans for the other districts affect BLM-administered lands in the BLM districts and counties of western Oregon that are listed in Table 1 (BLM districts and Oregon counties included in the planning area of the Western Oregon BLM resource management plan revisions). Table 1. BLM Districts And Oregon Counties Included In The Planning Area Of The Resource Management Plan Revisions BLM Districts Oregon Counties Coos Bay Benton Jackson Marion Eugene Clackamas Josephine Multnomah Lakeview (Klamath Falls Resource Area only) Clatsop Klamath Polk Medford Columbia Lane Tillamook Roseburg Coos Lincoln Washington Salem Curry Linn Yamhill Douglas Figure 1. Entire Planning Area Of The Western Oregon BLM Resource Management Plan Revisions 27 Salem District ROD and RMP The six coordinated resource management plans provide requirements for management of approximately 2,557,800 acres of federal land within the planning area. These BLM-administered lands are widely scattered and represent only about 11% of the planning area. Of the approximately 2,557,800 acres administered by the BLM, approximately 2,151,200 acres are managed primarily under the O&C Act and are commonly referred to as the O&C lands.
    [Show full text]