DOCSLIB.ORG

Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References] Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Farm site, New Jersey, 573, Whitewater Draw, 315 sites, 153 , 255, 289, 329, 330 576 Alnus, 93 village, 444 Abbott phase, 576 Alsands lease, 132 wells, 256 Abies, 93 Alsea River, 459 Arctic Archipelago, beaches, 70 lasiocarpa, 93, 100, 348 Alsen Formation, 570 Arctic coastal plain, 412 tridentata, 348, 354 Altithermal, 93, 177, 271, 281, 318, Argialbolls, 340 Abri Pataud, 10 335, 341, 344, 347, 348, 356 Argic Cryoborolls, 344 Absaroka Mountains, 347, 348 soil, 344,347, 356,534 argillic horizons, 544, 551 Acadia Forest Experiment Stattion, aluminum, 406 argillite, 67, 573 545 Amarillo, 55 argilliturbation, 553 accessions, pedogenic, 541 Amarillo points, 56 Argiustolls, 344 acquisition system, 571, 574 Amazon, 553 argonite, Wyandotte Cave, 219,226, Adak Island, 411 Amerindian sites, 148 229 adzes, 439, 445 ammonium, 10 argonite-calcite transition, 224 Africa, 554, 593 Amsden Formation, 348 Argopyron spicatum, 363 Agassiz basin, 23 amygdaloids, 481 Aridisol, 339, 363 Anadara, 474 agate, 561 Arikaree River, 286, 343 Anahim Peak, 68 Agate Basin, 70, 100 Arikaree River drainage, 270 projectile point, 124 Anangula Blade site, aAlaska, 384 Arizona, 315, 316, 318, 335, 480, Agate Basin Group, 337 Anangula Island, 384 483 Agate Basin horizon, 55 Anasazi culture, 323, 329 Armijo phase, 329 Agate Basin site, Wyoming, 337, Anasazi sites, 327, 328, 329, 33 0 Arrowhead Arch, Indiana, 223 344,355,356 Anastasia Formation, 443 Artemisia agglomerate, 481 Anathermal, 318 tridentata wyomingensis, 363 Agropyron Anchorage, Alaska, 385 sp„ 93, 310, 339 sm.ith.ii, 354 Anderson site, Kansas, 272 Artica islandica, 469 spp., 348 andesine tuff, 481 articlast, 403 Aivansh lava flow, 73 andesite flows, 481 Artifact Bank, Medicine Hat, 63, 76 Alabama, 483 Anodonta, 303, 309 artifacts, 22, 25, 42, 46, 68, 100, alabaster, 220, 222 anomalies 112, 115, 124, 129, 165, 174, Alaska, 69, 383, 384, 385, 399, anthropogenic, 614 178,189,222,229, 255, 256, 4 07,4 08, 409, 410, 411, 413, chemical, 207 259, 261, 263, 272, 284, 289, 416, 480, 481 geophysical, 614 315, 316,403,404, 414, 442, Alaska Panhandle, 413 Anthony Island, 116 443, 445, 446, 448, 449, 450, Alaska Peninsula, 385, 412, 460 Antiparos, 588 499,503,516, 519, 536, 554, Albemarle Sound, North Carolina, antler tines, 219 561,574 457 ants, 552 chert, 561, 573, 574, 587 Alberta, Canada, 62, 63, 64, 65, 67, anvil stone, 450 copper, 479,499,500,502,509 68, 72, 74, 77, 87, 90, 93, 94, Apalachee Bay Region, Florida, 446, flaked-stone, 317 97, 98,100, 101, 102, 110, 458 glass, 589 123, 124, 132, 133 Apan Basin, 431 horizons, 554 artifacts, 337 apatite, 563 lead, 588 northeastern, 123 Apollo Beach site, Florida, 445 lithic, 99, 126, 258, 442, 561, albite, 481 Appalachian Mountains, 2, 12, 13, 571 Alces, 70 482 microstructures, 503,509 Aleutian Islands, 383 Aquenta, 355 petrographic analysis, 571 Alexander Archipelago, 415, 460 Aquilla Creek, 263 stone, 62 Alfisols, 207, 209, 535 Aquolls, 337, 344, 347, 354, 355 taconite, 28 Algonkians, 132 aragonite, 219, 220, 224 Arvada Formation, 344 Allen site, Kansas, 270 speleothem, 219, 221,229 Ash County, North Carolina, 482 Allentown chert, 574 trace-element composition, 227 ash Allentown Formation, 569 Arbuckle Mountains, 253 volcanic, 384, 412, 598 allophane, 406 archaeologic time, 519 falls, 73, 385 allostratigraphic units, 400, 402 archaeology layers, 61, 514 Ashislepah Shelter, 327 alluvial fan, 98, 116, 291, 301, 304, archaeomagnetic dating, 597 Athabasca Oil Sands deposit, 123, 344, 361, 409 archaeomagnetism, 604, 607 127 alluvial muck, 410 archaeometallurgy, 499 Athabasca/Peace/Mackenzie system, alluvial soils, 543 archaeotemperatures, 599 74 Archaic Culture, 255, 323, 329 alluvial stratigraphy, 315 Athabasca River, 68, 123, 125, 126, Archaic Period, 271 alluviation, 409 131 artifacts, 255, 257 alluvium, 33, 183, 326, 337, 348, Athabasca Sandstone, 125, 127, 129, cemetery, 444 350, 408, 552 130 populations, 255,. 289, 330 Crawfish River, 207 Athabasca valley, 127, 132, 133 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/3732673/9780813754161_backmatter.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 620 Index Athabaskans, 73, 132 Beacon Hill Gravel, 570 kill site, 62, 64,100, 101, 256, Athens, 586 bear, short-face, 284 286, 337, 361, 366 Atlantic Climate Episode, 58 Bear Cave, 414 range, 73 Atlantic continental shelf, 461 Bear Cove site, Vancouver Island, remains, 54, 255, 256, 270, 271, deposit preservation, 457 115 284, 286, 287, 321, 366, 442, river valleys, 457 Beatton River drainage, 116 444, 445 sea level, 454 Beaufort sea coast, 413 Bison, 54, 95, 97, 98, 101, 102, sites, 439 beaver, giant, 284 112, 315 See also continental shelf Beaver Dam Member, 569 antiquus, 53, 277, 286 Atriplex spp., 328, 347 Beaver River borrow pit, 128 bison, 278 Atruscan sites, Italy, 607 Beaver River Quarry, 67, 124, 126, occidentalis, 287 attrition, 240 128, 129, 130 bivalves, 427 Aucilla River, 446 Beaver River Quartzite, 128 marine, 467, 469 Australia, 552 Beaver River Sandstone, 64, 123, season of death, 468 australopithecines, 516 128 shell cycles, 467 autobrecciation, 480 artifacts, 133 Black Mesa, Arizona, 335 avalanche, rock, 237 source, 130 Blackwater Locality No. 1, 256 Avenue of the Dead, 431 Beaverhead Mountains, 363 Blakeland soil, 343 Avon quarry, 67 Bedford Mound, Illinois, 229 blanks, 442, 449, 509,511 Avonlea pottery, 67 bedrock, 68, 111, 125,128, 388, Blarina brevicauda, 12, 16 Aztalan site, Wisconsin, 199 409, 446 Bliss Pit site, Saskatchewan, 95 alluvial sediments, 203 Beekmantown artifacts, 574 Blue Cypress Lake, 443 cultural activities, 203 Beekmantown Group, 569 Blue Ridge belt, 482 drainage basin, 203 Bell Basin, 91, 93 Blue Ridge province, 483 mesoenvironment, 200 bentonite, 302 Blue River, 277 midden deposits, 199, 206, 207, Berberis sp., 94 Bluefish Basin, 91, 93 208, 211, 214, 216 Berelekh Mammoth site, Siberia, 409 Bluefish Cave I, Yukon Territory, 63, presettlement vegetation, 202 Bering Sea, 453 77, 111, 117, 414, 415 sand frequency curves, 211 beach ridges, 384 Boca Ciega Bay, 445 soil-geomorphic analysis, 199 coast, 384 Bolen points, 445, 446 soil loss equation, 205, 215 shelf, 460 Bolyston Street Fishweir site, soil/sediment packages, 208 Bering Strait region, beach ridges, Massachusetts, 439 soils, 204 384 Boman site, Tennessee, 222 vegetation, 209 Beringia sites, 93, 399, 401 bones, 447, 450 artifacts, 408 Bonner Springs, Kansas, 276, 284 Badin phase, 175 beach ridges, 413 Bonner Springs exposure, 277 Bajada phase, 329 dating, 406 Bonnet Plume Basin, Yukon Balanus hameri, 7, 15 eolian environment, 410 Territory, 63, 91, 93, 403 Bald Eagle Formation, 576 fluvial environment, 408 borax, 302 Ballast Point, 449, 450 sea levels. 457 boreal forests, 105, 123, 127 Baltimore Canyon, 150 sediments, 408 bosing, 605 Baltimore Canyon Trough, 149 shoreline environments, 412 Boss Hill site, Alberta, 62 Banff area, 99, 100 slope processes, 410 Boston, Massachusetts, 439 Banff National Park, 65 soils, 402 Boston Basin, 137, 139 Banks Island, Canadian Arctic, 64 stratigraphie units, 401, 402 Boston Bay Group, 139 banner stone, 442 tephra, 412 Boston Blue Clay, 140 Bare Island/Poplar Island Complex, Beringian horizons, 405 Boston Harbor, Massachusetts, 137, 574 Beringian refugium, 108 144 Barhead, Alberta, 124 Bethanie, Quebec, 8 bottomlands, 273 Barstow Formation, 301, 302 betonites, 102 boundary units, 402 basalts, 68, 318, 363, 481 Betula, 93 Bow River, 77, 101 amygdaloidal, 480, 481, 482 bifaces, 190, 439 Bow River valley, 77 flows, 480, 481 Big Blue River, 271, 278, 289, 290 Bowers Beach, 153 basement rock, 554 prehistoric settlement patterns, bowls, 442, 449, 450 Basketmaker culture, 331 292 brachiopods, 565, 569, 570 Basketmaker phases, 329 Big Blue River drainage, 290 Bradford County, Pennsylvania, 483 Bates Holes site, Wyoming, 351, 356 Big Blue River valley, 278 Brady soil, 274 Battle River, Alberta, 65 Bighorn Basin, 355 Brazil, 553 Battleford Formation, 95 Bighorn Mountains, 347 Brazos River, 258, 263, 458 Bay of Chaleurs, 10 Bignell loess unit, 273, 274 breccias, pillow, 481 Bay of Culebra, 423, 428 biomantles, 544 Bridge River eruption, 116 Bay of Salinas, 423 biostratigraphic units, 400 Bridge River tephra, 71, 73, 93 Bayard, 55 biotite, 111, 387 Bristol Bay, 460 Bayard people, 56 bioturbation, 236, 263 British Columbia, Canada, 62, 63, Bayard points, 55 Birch Hills, Alberta, 74 66, 69, 72, 73, 74, 77, 87, 91, Bayard sites, 56 Birch Mountains, 124, 125, 133 beaches, 69 92,97, 99, 113, 114, 115, Birmingham Shale, 231 116, 117, 125, 481 Pacific Coast, 70 Bisbee, Arizona, 480, 483 coastal, 114 ridges, 144,384, 411, 413 bison, 343 inner shelf, 459 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/3732673/9780813754161_backmatter.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 Index 621 interior, 116 Cap d'Or, Nova Scotia, 480 Chatahoochee River sites, lamellae, northeastern, 116 Cape Fear River, 161 167 sea level, 457 Cape Kruzenstern, 413 chemical analysis, 367 sites, 113 beach ridges, 384 Cheop's pyramid, 612, 614 Brohm site, Ontario, 22 Cape Henlopen, 153, 156 Chephren's Pyramid, 612, 614 Bromus tectorum, 348 Cape Nome, 413 Cherokee site, Missouri, 536 bronzes, ancient, 586, 587 carbon, 586,590,593 cherts, 13, 67, 95, 190, 229, 268, Brooks Island site, California, 452 isotopes, 590 301, 303, 318, 445, 446,561 Brooks Range, 384, 408, 409, 531 carbon-nitrogen ratio, 366 artifacts, 561 Brooks River, 412 carbonate, 111, 125 , 244, 303 , 325, bedded, 562 bryozoans, 569, 570 347,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Watersheds in the Alberta Oil Sands Environmental Research Program Study Area: Drainage Basin Delineations, Watershed
    WATERSHEDS IN THE ALBERTA OIL SANDS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM STUDY AREA: DRAINAGE BASIN DELINEATIONS, WATERSHED AREA~AND STREAM PROFILES by C.R. FROELICH and G. LEE of ALBERTA OIL SANDS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM March 1980 HY 2.1 vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DECLARATION ..... i i LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. iii DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY iv LIST OF TABLES .. vi i i LIST OF FIGURES. ix ABSTRACT xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi i 1. INTRODUCTION 2. WATERSHED COVERAGE ,3 3. METHODOLOGY . 9 3.1 Watershed Boundary Delineations 9 3.2 Watershed Drainage Area Determinations ... 9 3.3 Main Channel Profiles. : ....... 15 4. AVAILABILITY OF WATERSHED MAPS AND PROFILES. 1 6 5. GLOSSARY OF TERMS . 17 6. APPENDIX 18 6.1 Watershed Boundary Delineation 18 6.2 Watershed Profiles ..... 64 7. LIST OF AOS ERP RESEARCH "REPORTS . 105 vi i i LIST OF TABLES Page 1- Watershed Boundary Del ineation Maps Currently Avai lable for the AOSERP Study Area 6 2. Watershed Drainage Areas for the AOSERP Study Area 10 3. Watershed Drainage Areas of Muskeg River Sub-basins 13 4. Watershed Drainage Areas of Major Lakes . 14 ix LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. Location of AOSERP Study Area . 2 2. AOSERP Study Area Watershed Boundaries 4 3. Lake and Stream Study Sites in the Muskeg River Basin.. 5 4. Alga r Rive r Ba sin . 19 5. Beaver River Basin 20 6. Big Island Lake Basin 21 7. Buckton Creek Basin. 22 8. Buffalo Creek Basin .. 23 9. Calumet River Basin. 24 10. Clark Creek Basin. 25 11. Clearwater River Basin 26 12. Con n Cree k Ba sin .
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2: Baseline, Section 13: Traditional Land Use September 2011 Volume 2: Baseline Studies Frontier Project Section 13: Traditional Land Use
    R1 R24 R23 R22 R21 R20 T113 R19 R18 R17 R16 Devil's Gate 220 R15 R14 R13 R12 R11 R10 R9 R8 R7 R6 R5 R4 R3 R2 R1 ! T112 Fort Chipewyan Allison Bay 219 T111 Dog Head 218 T110 Lake Claire ³ Chipewyan 201A T109 Chipewyan 201B T108 Old Fort 217 Chipewyan 201 T107 Maybelle River T106 Wildland Provincial Wood Buffalo National Park Park Alberta T105 Richardson River Dunes Wildland Athabasca Dunes Saskatchewan Provincial Park Ecological Reserve T104 Chipewyan 201F T103 Chipewyan 201G T102 T101 2888 T100 Marguerite River Wildland Provincial Park T99 1661 850 Birch Mountains T98 Wildland Provincial Namur River Park 174A 33 2215 T97 94 2137 1716 T96 1060 Fort McKay 174C Namur Lake 174B 2457 239 1714 T95 21 400 965 2172 T94 ! Fort McKay 174D 1027 Fort McKay Marguerite River 2006 Wildland Provincial 879 T93 771 Park 772 2718 2926 2214 2925 T92 587 2297 2894 T91 T90 274 Whitemud Falls T89 65 !Fort McMurray Wildland Provincial Park T88 Clearwater 175 Clearwater River T87Traditional Land Provincial Park Fort McKay First Nation Gregoire Lake Provincial Park T86 Registered Fur Grand Rapids Anzac Management Area (RFMA) Wildland Provincial ! Gipsy Lake Wildland Park Provincial Park T85 Traditional Land Use Regional Study Area Gregoire Lake 176, T84 176A & 176B Traditional Land Use Local Study Area T83 ST63 ! Municipality T82 Highway Stony Mountain Township Wildland Provincial T81 Park Watercourse T80 Waterbody Cowper Lake 194A I.R. Janvier 194 T79 Wabasca 166 Provincial Park T78 National Park 0 15 30 45 T77 KILOMETRES 1:1,500,000 UTM Zone 12 NAD 83 T76 Date: 20110815 Author: CES Checked: DC File ID: 123510543-097 (Original page size: 8.5X11) Acknowledgements: Base data: AltaLIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Physalis Longifolia in the U.S
    The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review1 ,2 3 2 2 KELLY KINDSCHER* ,QUINN LONG ,STEVE CORBETT ,KIRSTEN BOSNAK , 2 4 5 HILLARY LORING ,MARK COHEN , AND BARBARA N. TIMMERMANN 2Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA 3Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, USA 4Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA 5Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA *Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review. The wild tomatillo, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and related species have been important wild-harvested foods and medicinal plants. This paper reviews their traditional use as food and medicine; it also discusses taxonomic difficulties and provides information on recent medicinal chemistry discoveries within this and related species. Subtle morphological differences recognized by taxonomists to distinguish this species from closely related taxa can be confusing to botanists and ethnobotanists, and many of these differences are not considered to be important by indigenous people. Therefore, the food and medicinal uses reported here include information for P. longifolia, as well as uses for several related taxa found north of Mexico. The importance of wild Physalis species as food is reported by many tribes, and its long history of use is evidenced by frequent discovery in archaeological sites. These plants may have been cultivated, or “tended,” by Pueblo farmers and other tribes. The importance of this plant as medicine is made evident through its historical ethnobotanical use, information in recent literature on Physalis species pharmacology, and our Native Medicinal Plant Research Program’s recent discovery of 14 new natural products, some of which have potent anti-cancer activity.
    [Show full text]
  • People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: a Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 2012 People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Deborah Confer University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Deur, Douglas and Confer, Deborah, "People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada" (2012). Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations. 98. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/98 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Pacific West Region: Social Science Series National Park Service Publication Number 2012-01 U.S. Department of the Interior PEOPLE OF SNOWY MOUNTAIN, PEOPLE OF THE RIVER: A MULTI-AGENCY ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW AND COMPENDIUM RELATING TO TRIBES ASSOCIATED WITH CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 2012 Douglas Deur, Ph.D. and Deborah Confer LAKE MEAD AND BLACK CANYON Doc Searls Photo, Courtesy Wikimedia Commons
    [Show full text]
  • 8.0 Fishing and Water Use
    SECTION 8.0 FISHING AND WATER USE 8.0 Fishing and Water Use Fishing has always been part of the Fort McKay Métis livelihood. Many books, reports and assessments have described the importance of the traditional fishery to people of Fort McKay (FMSD 2015, FMSD 2013, Stanislawski 1998, FMFN 1994, FMTA 1983). In 1983, the FMTA said, “We emphasize the main rivers, and particularly the Athabasca, because in the early years since our contact with non-Indians, these rivers served as transportation or penetration routes through our territory. The rivers and many creeks within our hunting and trapping territory are important to emphasize because our people’s land use roughly corresponds to the watershed boundaries and the drainage areas contained within them. These we view as natural boundaries and serve as points of reference.” (FMTA 1983, p. 72) Key fishing areas in the vicinity of Fort McKay included the Athabasca River corridor, Firebag River drainage and the Namur Lakes area (Stanislawski 1998). The Muskeg River Basin is also ecologically and culturally important to Fort McKay Métis people (FMSD 2015; MMSC WS2 2015). Some of the waterways traditionally used by Fort McKay First Nation and Métis community members have been mapped and described in several key reports (FMFN 1994; Stanislawski 1998; FMSD 2013). These waterways, and the key watersheds they are associated with, are shown on Map 5. As far as the Métis community's concerned, Métis communities stuck to the rivers. For the most part, they used the river systems as a way to get around. That was their life.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD 102 Columbine Building 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203
    / COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD 102 Columbine Building 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 M E M O R A N D U M SUBJECT: Status of Flood Plain Information Program in Colorado June 1974 Increasing recognition of the importance of Colorado's flood plains is occurring. Colorado Revised Statutes 1963, as amended, Section 149-1-11(4), authorizes the Colorado Water Conservation Board to designate and approve storm or flood water runoff channels and to make such designations available to legis­ lative bodies of local jurisdictions. In addition to assisting local governmental entities in obtaining basic flood plain data, the Board is actively engaged in assisting local governments in developing and adopting effective flood plain ordinances and related land use regulations. The Board has the responsibility of coordinating all flood related studies within the state of Colorado, which includes scheduling the Flood Plain Information Studies conducted by federal agencies, and can provide direct financial assistance for a study within Colorado. The intent is that, with these data outlining the flood plains, local entities can control the use of these flood plains and thereby prevent developments within the paths of future floods. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, have specific authorities for the preparation of detailed flood plain reports. House Bill 1041, relating to the use of land, (Article 7, Chapter 106, CRS 1963, as amended) provides, "Flood­ plains shall be administered so as to minimize significant hazards to public health and safety or to property. Open space activities shall be encouraged in the floodplains." Concerning the designation and use of flood plains, the Board is charged with responsibilities under the Act as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado a Users Guide to the Classification Project
    A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado A Users Guide to the Classification Project September 1, 1999 By Gwen Kittel, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen and John Sanderson Clockwise from top: Conejos River, Conejos County, Populus angustifolia-Picea pungens/Alnus incana Riparian Woodland Flattop Wilderness, Garfield County, Carex aquatilis Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation South Platte River, Logan County, Populus deltoides/Carex lanuginosa Riparian Woodland California Park, Routt County, Salix boothii/Mesic Graminoids Riparian Shrubland Joe Wright Creek, Larimer County, Abies lasiocarpa-Picea engelmannii/Alnus incana Riparian Forest Dolores River, San Miguel County, Forestiera pubescens Riparian Shrubland Center Photo San Luis Valley, Saguache County, Juncus balticus Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation (Photography by Gwen Kittel) 2 Prepared by: Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Bldg. Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 [email protected] This report should be cited as follows: Kittel, Gwen, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau, Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen, and John Sanderson. 1999. A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado: User Guide to the Classification Project. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. 80523 For more information please contact: Colorado Natural Heritage Program, 254 General Service Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523. (970)
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Watersmart
    Alberta Innovates A Roadmap for Sustainable Water Management in the Athabasca River Basin Submitted by: Dr. P. Kim Sturgess, C.M., P.Eng., FCAE CEO WaterSMART Solutions Ltd. 605, 839 5th Ave SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 3C8 [email protected] Submitted to: Dallas Johnson Director, Integrated Land Management Alberta Innovates 1800 Phipps McKinnon Building 10020 – 101A Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3G2 [email protected] Submitted on: September 28, 2018 The Sustainable Water Management in the Athabasca River Basin Initiative was enabled through core funding provided by Alberta Innovates and matching funds contributed by the Alberta Energy Regulator, Alberta Environment and Parks, ATCO, Repsol Oil and Gas, Suncor Energy, and Westmoreland Coal Company. This report is available and may be freely downloaded from http://albertawatersmart.com/featured- projects/collaborative-watershed-management.html Alberta Innovates (Al) and Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta make no warranty, express or implied, nor assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information contained in this publication, nor that use thereof infringe on privately owned rights. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of AI or Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta. The directors, officers, employees, agents and consultants of AI and the Government of Alberta are exempted, excluded and absolved from all liability for damage or injury, howsoever caused, to any person in connection with or arising out of the use by that person for any purpose of this publication or its contents. Suggested citation for this report: WaterSMART Solutions Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Package Watercourse
    Information Package Watercourse Crossing Management Directive June 2019 Disclaimer The information contained in this information package is provided for general information only and is in no way legal advice. It is not a substitute for knowing the AER requirements contained in the applicable legislation, including directives and manuals and how they apply in your particular situation. You should consider obtaining independent legal and other professional advice to properly understand your options and obligations. Despite the care taken in preparing this information package, the AER makes no warranty, expressed or implied, and does not assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. For the most up-to-date versions of the documents contained in the appendices, use the links provided throughout this document. Printed versions are uncontrolled. Revision History Name Date Changes Made Jody Foster enter a date. Finalized document. enter a date. enter a date. enter a date. enter a date. Alberta Energy Regulator | Information Package 1 Alberta Energy Regulator Content Watercourse Crossing Remediation Directive ......................................................................................... 4 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 4 How the Program Works .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An#Integrated#Assessment#Of#The#Cumulative#Impacts#Of#Climate# Change'and'industrial'development'on'salmon'in'western'bc!! Stiki
    An#integrated#assessment#of#the#cumulative#impacts#of#climate# change'and'industrial'development'on'salmon'in'Western'BC!! Stikine and Upper Nass Current Social-Ecological Conditions Summary Prepared by: Christina Melymick, Consultant April 2013 The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the author and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions of the Bulkley Valley Research Centre or the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. [email protected] • Box 4274 Smithers, BC V0J 2N0 Canada An#integrated#assessment#of#the#cumulative#impacts#of#climate#change#and#industrial#development#on#salmon#in#Western#BC#! Acknowledgements Thank you to the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation for supporting this project. Thank you to Jim Pojar for his expansive knowledge and expertise, and for adding to the stack of resources used during research. Thank you to Dave Bustard for taking time from a busy schedule to lend his extensive local knowledge and expertise. Thank you to John Kelson for his eulachon knowledge. Thank you to Richard Overstall for his knowledge and support. Thank you to Rick Budhwa for his support and contribution to the cultural aspects of this report. Thank you to Johanna Pfalz for her support and for providing all the relevant maps. Thank you to Ken Rabnett for support, his breadth of knowledge on the study area. Thank you to Don Morgan for the opportunity to carry out the research and produce this report, and for constant patience, guidance and support through the course of completing this report. Credits Don
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Sulfate 1
    UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Sulfate 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Arikaree River County: Cheyenne HUC 8: (In Kansas) 10250001 HUC 11 (HUC 14s): (In Kansas) 080 (030, 040 and 050) Drainage Area: 37 square miles in Kansas 1725 square miles total above sampling station Main Stem Segment: WQLS: 1 (Arikaree River) starting at the Kansas-Nebraska state line and traveling upstream through northwest Cheyenne County to the Kansas-Colorado state line (Figure 1). Tributaries: All tributaries located in Colorado, segment numbers unknown Horse Creek Sand Creek Gordon Creek Currie Creek Dugout Creek Hell Creek North Fork Arikaree River Designated Uses: Special Aquatic Life Support, Primary Contact Recreation (C), Domestic Water Supply; Food Procurement; Ground Water Recharge; Industrial Water Supply Use; Irrigation Use; Livestock Watering Use for Kansas Segment. Impaired Use: Domestic Water Supply Water Quality Standard: Sulfate: 250 mg/l for Domestic Water Supply (KAR 28-16-28e(c) (3) (A)) 1 (Figure 1) 2. CURRENT WATER QUALITY CONDITION AND DESIRED ENDPOINT Level of Support for Designated Use under 2004 303(d): Not Supporting Domestic Water Supply Monitoring Sites: Station 226 at Haigler, NE. Period of Record Used: 1986-2005 for Station 226 (Figure 2, Table 1) 2 Sulfate Concentration at SC226 900 800 700 600 500 mg/L 400 300 200 100 0 Jul-90 Jul-92 Jul-94 Jul-96 Jul-98 Jul-99 Apr-91 Apr-93 Apr-95 Apr-97 Apr-00 Oct-91 Oct-93 Oct-95 Oct-97 Oct-00 Jun-91 Jun-93 Jun-95 Jun-97 Jan-92 Jan-94 Aug-91 Aug-93 Aug-97 Mar-86 Mar-90 Feb-91 Dec-91 Mar-92 Nov-92 Feb-93 Mar-94 Nov-94 Feb-95 Mar-96 Nov-96 Feb-97 Nov-98 Mar-99 Nov-99 Nov-99 Feb-00 Mar-01 Mar-03 Sep-90 Sep-92 Sep-94 Sep-96 Sep-98 Sep-99 Sep-01 Sep-03 May-86 May-87 May-88 May-89 May-90 May-92 May-94 May-96 May-98 May-99 May-01 May-03 (Figure 2-Line indicates domestic water supply criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGEMENT PLAN November 2003
    MANAGEMENT PLAN November 2003 for Stikine Country Protected Areas Mount Edziza Provincial Park Mount Edziza Protected Area (Proposed) Stikine River Provincial Park Spatsizi Plateau Wilderness Provincial Park Gladys Lake Ecological Reserve Ministry of Water, Land Pitman River Protected Area and Air Protection Environmental Stewardship Chukachida Protected Area Division Skeena Region Tatlatui Provincial Park Stikine Country Protected Areas M ANAGEMENT LAN P November 2003 Prepared by Skeena Region Environmental Stewardship Division Smithers BC Stikine Country Protected Areas Management Plan National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data British Columbia. Environmental Stewardship Division. Skeena Region. Stikine Country Protected Areas management plan Cover title: Management plan for Stikine Country Protected Areas. Issued by: Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Environmental Stewardship Division, Skeena Region. “November 2003” “Mount Edziza Provincial Park, Mount Edziza Protected Area (Proposed), Stikine River Provincial Park, Spatsizi Plateau Wilderness Provincial Park, Gladys Lake Ecological Reserve, Pitman River Protected Area, Chukachida Protected Area, Tatlatui Provincial Park”—Cover. Also available on the Internet. Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-5124-8 1. Protected areas - British Columbia – Stikine Region. 2. Provincial parks and reserves - British Columbia – Stikine Region. 3. Ecosystem management - British Columbia – Stikine Region. I. British Columbia. Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection.
    [Show full text]