DOCSLIB.ORG

Peak-Flow Frequency Relations and Evaluation of the Peak-Flow Gaging Network in Nebraska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peak-Flow Frequency Relations and Evaluation of the Peak-Flow Gaging Network in Nebraska Prepared in cooperation with the Nebraska Department of Roads Peak-Flow Frequency Relations and Evaluation of the Peak-Flow Gaging Network in Nebraska Water-Resources Investigations Report 99–4032 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Peak-Flow Frequency Relations and Evaluation of the Peak-Flow Gaging Network in Nebraska By Philip J. Soenksen, Lisa D. Miller, Jennifer B. Sharpe, and Jason R. Watton Water-Resources Investigations Report 99–4032 Prepared in cooperation with the Nebraska Department of Roads U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Lincoln, Nebraska, 1999 For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey, WRD 406 Federal Building 100 Centennial Mall North Lincoln, NE 68506 Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 2 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................... 4 Quantification of Drainage-Basin Characteristics ............................................................................................. 4 Morphometric Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 4 Soil Characteristics .............................................................................................................................. 5 Precipitation Characteristics ................................................................................................................ 5 Peak-Flow Frequency Analyses ........................................................................................................................ 5 Standard Analyses ............................................................................................................................... 6 Adjustments for Historic Data ....................................................................................................... 6 Adjustments for High and Low Outliers ....................................................................................... 6 Generalized Skew Coefficients............................................................................................. 7 High-Permeability Regional Skew Equation ....................................................................... 9 Northern and Western Regional Skew Equation ................................................................. 10 Northeastern Regional Skew Equation ................................................................................ 10 Southeastern Regional Skew Equation ................................................................................ 12 Low-Permeability Skew Map .............................................................................................. 12 Composite Analyses ............................................................................................................................ 12 Peak-Flow Frequency Relations ........................................................................................................................ 16 Unregulated Streams ........................................................................................................................... 16 Regional Equations ........................................................................................................................ 19 High Permeability Region ................................................................................................... 21 Northern and Western Region ............................................................................................. 23 Northeastern Region ............................................................................................................24 Central and South-Central Region ....................................................................................... 25 Eastern Region ..................................................................................................................... 26 Upper Republican River Region .......................................................................................... 27 Big Blue River Region ........................................................................................................ 28 Application of Equations ............................................................................................................... 28 Regulated Streams ............................................................................................................................... 29 Niobrara River ............................................................................................................................... 29 North Platte River .......................................................................................................................... 29 South Platte River .......................................................................................................................... 33 Platte River .................................................................................................................................... 33 Salt and Antelope Creeks .............................................................................................................. 33 Republican River ........................................................................................................................... 33 Frenchman Creek ........................................................................................................................... 38 Red Willow Creek ......................................................................................................................... 38 Network Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................... 41 Station Selection .................................................................................................................................. 41 Analyses and Output ........................................................................................................................... 41 Discussion of Results .......................................................................................................................... 44 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 44 Selected References ........................................................................................................................................... 46 CONTENTS iii CONTENTS--Continued Page Appendixes A—Descriptions of Selected Drainage-Basin Characteristics Quantified Using Basinsoft, ARC-INFO, and Related GIS Programs .............................................................................................A-1 Morphometric Characteristics ....................................................................................................... A-2 Modifications to Basinsoft .................................................................................................. A-2 Areal-Size Quantifications .................................................................................................. A-2 Linear-Size Quantifications ................................................................................................ A-2 Shape Quantifications ......................................................................................................... A-2 Relief Quantifications .........................................................................................................A-2 Aspect Quantification ......................................................................................................... A-3 Stream-Network Quantifications ........................................................................................ A-3 Relief-Stream Network Quantifications .............................................................................. A-3 Soil Characteristics ....................................................................................................................... A-3 Precipitation Characteristics ......................................................................................................... A-4 B—Tables of Drainage-Basin Characteristics and Peak-Flow Frequency Data ...................................... B-1 C—Graphs of Composite Peak-Flow Frequency Curves for Selected Stations ....................................... C-1 Figures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Burying Beetle Nebraska Distribution
    Building Merritt Dam The What the Beetle Does Excavation of the core trench on the west side of Merritt Dam during May 1963. Note the series of 1 wells and waterlines to 1) Using their antennae, they have an dewater the work. American amazing ability to detect a carcass, such as a ground squirrel, up to two miles away. Even if it died only a few hours before. These carcasses are Burying scarce and the perfect place to find a mate. A dragline is setting the form in place for the Beetle 2 morning glory section of the spillway inlet structure during June 1963. 2) If the carcass is the right size, the pair will move it up to a few feet to a spot where the ground is soft enough for burial. This creature has an amazing ability to keep our landscape clean. Although they are only 1½ to 2 inches long, these beetles work hard to find and bury dead and decaying animals (carrion). To the beetles, carrion is food and necessary for their complex reproductive process. To humans, their activities benefit the entire ecosystem by recycling nutrients. They are so efficient that they often complete their task before flies can use the carcass for A Jersey spreader lays down their own breeding, which helps keep pest fly populations in check. Researchers are also investigating soil cement facing on Merritt 3 Dam in November 1963. antimicrobial properties of their secretions for pharmaceutical use. 3) Using bulldozer like movements, they plow through the ground, moving Nebraska provides one of the last strongholds for this species declared endangered in 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD 102 Columbine Building 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203
    / COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD 102 Columbine Building 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 M E M O R A N D U M SUBJECT: Status of Flood Plain Information Program in Colorado June 1974 Increasing recognition of the importance of Colorado's flood plains is occurring. Colorado Revised Statutes 1963, as amended, Section 149-1-11(4), authorizes the Colorado Water Conservation Board to designate and approve storm or flood water runoff channels and to make such designations available to legis­ lative bodies of local jurisdictions. In addition to assisting local governmental entities in obtaining basic flood plain data, the Board is actively engaged in assisting local governments in developing and adopting effective flood plain ordinances and related land use regulations. The Board has the responsibility of coordinating all flood related studies within the state of Colorado, which includes scheduling the Flood Plain Information Studies conducted by federal agencies, and can provide direct financial assistance for a study within Colorado. The intent is that, with these data outlining the flood plains, local entities can control the use of these flood plains and thereby prevent developments within the paths of future floods. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, have specific authorities for the preparation of detailed flood plain reports. House Bill 1041, relating to the use of land, (Article 7, Chapter 106, CRS 1963, as amended) provides, "Flood­ plains shall be administered so as to minimize significant hazards to public health and safety or to property. Open space activities shall be encouraged in the floodplains." Concerning the designation and use of flood plains, the Board is charged with responsibilities under the Act as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado a Users Guide to the Classification Project
    A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado A Users Guide to the Classification Project September 1, 1999 By Gwen Kittel, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen and John Sanderson Clockwise from top: Conejos River, Conejos County, Populus angustifolia-Picea pungens/Alnus incana Riparian Woodland Flattop Wilderness, Garfield County, Carex aquatilis Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation South Platte River, Logan County, Populus deltoides/Carex lanuginosa Riparian Woodland California Park, Routt County, Salix boothii/Mesic Graminoids Riparian Shrubland Joe Wright Creek, Larimer County, Abies lasiocarpa-Picea engelmannii/Alnus incana Riparian Forest Dolores River, San Miguel County, Forestiera pubescens Riparian Shrubland Center Photo San Luis Valley, Saguache County, Juncus balticus Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation (Photography by Gwen Kittel) 2 Prepared by: Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Bldg. Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 [email protected] This report should be cited as follows: Kittel, Gwen, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau, Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen, and John Sanderson. 1999. A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado: User Guide to the Classification Project. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. 80523 For more information please contact: Colorado Natural Heritage Program, 254 General Service Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523. (970)
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Instream Flow Methodologies for Fisheries in Nebraska Phil Hilgert Nebraska Game and Parks Commission
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications 1982 Evaluation of Instream Flow Methodologies for Fisheries in Nebraska Phil Hilgert Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamepubs Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Hilgert, Phil, "Evaluation of Instream Flow Methodologies for Fisheries in Nebraska" (1982). Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications. 39. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamepubs/39 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. EVALUATION OF INSTREAM FLOW BY ME1HOOOLOGmS PHIL HILGERT FOR FISHERIES IN NEBRASKA :: EVALUATION OF INSTREAM ROW MEmODOLOGmS FOR FISHERIES IN NEBRASKA BY PHIL HILGERT Edited by Gene Zuerlein Nebraska Technical Series No. 10 Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Lincoln, Nebraska 1982 Funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Under Contract No. 14-16-0006-78-002 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Sincere thanks are extended to the employees of the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission for their support and assistance in collecting field data. A special thanks to Gene Zuerlein, Fisheries Research Supervisor, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, for his encouragement and patience during preparation of this manuscript. To members of the Cooperative Instream Flow Ser­ vice Group, I wish to extend my appreciation for their tech­ nical advice and continued interest in the advancement of instream flow technology.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Sulfate 1
    UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Sulfate 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Arikaree River County: Cheyenne HUC 8: (In Kansas) 10250001 HUC 11 (HUC 14s): (In Kansas) 080 (030, 040 and 050) Drainage Area: 37 square miles in Kansas 1725 square miles total above sampling station Main Stem Segment: WQLS: 1 (Arikaree River) starting at the Kansas-Nebraska state line and traveling upstream through northwest Cheyenne County to the Kansas-Colorado state line (Figure 1). Tributaries: All tributaries located in Colorado, segment numbers unknown Horse Creek Sand Creek Gordon Creek Currie Creek Dugout Creek Hell Creek North Fork Arikaree River Designated Uses: Special Aquatic Life Support, Primary Contact Recreation (C), Domestic Water Supply; Food Procurement; Ground Water Recharge; Industrial Water Supply Use; Irrigation Use; Livestock Watering Use for Kansas Segment. Impaired Use: Domestic Water Supply Water Quality Standard: Sulfate: 250 mg/l for Domestic Water Supply (KAR 28-16-28e(c) (3) (A)) 1 (Figure 1) 2. CURRENT WATER QUALITY CONDITION AND DESIRED ENDPOINT Level of Support for Designated Use under 2004 303(d): Not Supporting Domestic Water Supply Monitoring Sites: Station 226 at Haigler, NE. Period of Record Used: 1986-2005 for Station 226 (Figure 2, Table 1) 2 Sulfate Concentration at SC226 900 800 700 600 500 mg/L 400 300 200 100 0 Jul-90 Jul-92 Jul-94 Jul-96 Jul-98 Jul-99 Apr-91 Apr-93 Apr-95 Apr-97 Apr-00 Oct-91 Oct-93 Oct-95 Oct-97 Oct-00 Jun-91 Jun-93 Jun-95 Jun-97 Jan-92 Jan-94 Aug-91 Aug-93 Aug-97 Mar-86 Mar-90 Feb-91 Dec-91 Mar-92 Nov-92 Feb-93 Mar-94 Nov-94 Feb-95 Mar-96 Nov-96 Feb-97 Nov-98 Mar-99 Nov-99 Nov-99 Feb-00 Mar-01 Mar-03 Sep-90 Sep-92 Sep-94 Sep-96 Sep-98 Sep-99 Sep-01 Sep-03 May-86 May-87 May-88 May-89 May-90 May-92 May-94 May-96 May-98 May-99 May-01 May-03 (Figure 2-Line indicates domestic water supply criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado 1 !( 1 27 S.P
    # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # # ## ## # # ## # # # # 1 2 3 4 5 # 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) " 8 Muddy !a Ik ") 24 6 ") !(KÂ ) )¬ !( LA" RAMIE KIMBALL GARDEN 1 ") I¸ 6 Medicine Bow !` Lod Centennial 4 gep National Federal ole !(! Kimball 9 Lake McConaughy CARBON Forest I§ 9 CHEYENNE 11 Cr Bushnell 12 1 Potter CURT GOWDY eek !( 11 ") 15 ") ") Riverside !( LARAMIE !( ") Ik ") !( ) 8 " Colorado 1 !( 1 27 S.P. Pine 2 Ij Cr Medicine Bow ") 2 !a KÂ 6 .R. 3 12 2 7 9 ) Flaming Gorge eek .R ") " National 34 U.P !( Burns Bluffs ") 5 National SWEETWATER Encampment !( 10 7 KEITH 40 Forest !( Red Buttes !( 4 Egbert ") 8 Sidney 10 Lodgepole Recreation Area 796 !( 2 DEUEL ") ) " !( 6 ") ") 3 Albany ") 9 2 A !( 6 ) R 6 Ik !a " 1 3 3 9 n i 27 2 6 ver CHEYENNE ") Brule K G 10 lio ") 4 ") Big Springs Jct. 9 Ik ") ) " Chappell 14 rmil 17 ") 3 2 !( !( e 4 ") V Woods Landing S !a ") N !( Ik ) !( 8 15 8 " ") !a " ) # ALBANY 3 3 3 5 7 Big Springs 2 ") ") !( ") 4 3 !( k 11 6 2 ") 6 WYOMING e MI Medicine Bow 4 Carpenter Barton ") !( Baggs Dixon !( 6 RA I« 10 ) Tie Siding " Cre Savery !( !( !( National ") 6 O 7 9 B !( 4 Forest 8 9 5 4 5 Flaming UTAH 2 5 15 9 A Dutch John Mountain ") Y I¸11 Gorge !( !( 4 NEBRASKA !( Res. Powder Home 2 K NE C ! ! !( ! W o 7 ll Little Enca WYOMING 3 tt Tal She !( Wash Slater on ! ") S amant Ovid 4 ! Snake River mpmen wo ! es L 3 !( ! ! o ! Gr Midd ittle d 8 ! JULESBURG een Creek Powder Wash le t !( Hereford !( C ! 8 k NORTHGATE 4 Peetz re Sedgwick ! reek W K Virginia Jumbo Lake e ! ! ! C For ing k !( ") 1 il 7 RA Creek lo CANYON k Larami !( Dale B I§ w Big Creek e F re o 2 9 8 Creek 9 C x DAGGETT ou For Ce Lakes e 7 ") B A eek So k NATURE TRAIL r e lde d 7 r l k a 0 k I« 1 C mil o r 17 mon r PERKINS r C uc 293 Pawnee Rive ee 9 R e r outh ver iv ") Carr 1 eek St Poudre er Rockport 9 7 Dry S Ri 4 Cr SENTINAL !( National 22 ek La HAMILTON RESERVOIR/ !( k 6 NE A G re Halligan Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado 1 (! 1 27 Y S.P
    # # # # # # # # # ######## # # ## # # # ## # # # # # 1 2 3 4 5 # 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) " 8 Muddy !a Ik ") 24 6 ") (!KÂ ) )¬ (! LARAMIE" KIMBALL GARDEN 1 ") I¸ 6 Medicine Bow !` Lodg Centennial 4 ep National Federal ole (! 9 Lake McConaughy CARBON Forest I§ Kimball 9 CHEYENNE 11 C 12 1 Potter CURT GOWDY reek Bushnell (! 11 ") 15 ") ") Riverside (! LARAMIE ! ") Ik ( ") (! ) " Colorado 1 8 (! 1 27 Y S.P. ") Pine !a 2 Ij Cree Medicine Bow 2 KÂ 6 .R. 3 12 2 7 9 ) Flaming Gorge R ") " National 34 .P. (! Burns Bluffs k U ") 10 5 National SWEETWATER Encampment (! 7 KEITH 40 Forest (! Red Buttes (! 4 Egbert ") 8 Sidney 10 Lodgepole Recreation Area 796 (! DEUEL ") ) " ") 2 ! 6 ") 3 ( Albany ") 9 2 A (! 6 9 ) River 27 6 Ik !a " 1 2 3 6 3 CHEYENNE ") Brule K ") on ") G 4 10 Big Springs Jct. 9 lli ") ) Ik " ") 3 Chappell 2 14 (! (! 17 4 ") Vermi S Woods Landing ") !a N (! Ik ) ! 8 15 8 " ") ) ( " !a # ALBANY 3 3 ^! 5 7 2 3 ") ( Big Springs ") ") (! 4 3 (! 11 6 2 ek ") 6 WYOMING MI Dixon Medicine Bow 4 Carpenter Barton ") (! (! 6 RA I« 10 ) Baggs Tie Siding " Cre Savery (! ! (! National ") ( 6 O 7 9 B (! 4 Forest 8 9 5 4 5 Flaming UTAH 2 5 15 9 A Dutch John Mountain ") Y I¸11 Gorge (! 4 NEBRASKA (! (! Powder K Res. ^ Home tonwo 2 ^ NE t o o ! C d ! ell h Little En (! WYOMING 3 W p ! 7 as S Tala Sh (! W Slater cam ^ ") Ovid 4 ! ! mant Snake River pm ^ ^ 3 ! es Cr (! ! ! ^ Li ! Gr Mi en ^ ^ ^ ttle eek 8 ! ^JULESBURG een Creek k Powder Wash ddle t ! Hereford (! ! 8 e NORTHGATE 4 ( Peetz ! ! Willo ork K R Virginia Jumbo Lake Sedgwick ! ! # T( ") Cre F ing (! 1 ek Y 7 RA ^ Cre CANYON ek Lara (! Dale B I§ w Big Creek o k F e 2 9 8 Cre 9 Cr x DAGGETT o Fo m Lakes e 7 C T(R B r NATURE TRAIL ") A ee u So k i e e lde d 7 r lomon e k a I« 1 0 Cr mil h k k r 17 t r r 293 PERKINS River Creek u e 9 River Pawnee v 1 e o e ") Carr ree r Rockport Stuc Poud 49 7 r® Dry S Ri C National 22 SENTINAL La HAMILTON RESERVOIR/ (! (! k 6 NE e A Gr e Halligan Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Water Conservation Methods to Conserve the High Plains Aquifer and Arikaree River Basin
    THESIS WATER CONSERVATION METHODS TO CONSERVE THE HIGH PLAINS AQUIFER AND ARIKAREE RIVER BASIN: A CASE STUDY ON THE ARIKAREE RIVER Submitted by Adam K. Prior Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2010 Master’s Committee: Department Head: Luis Garcia Advisor: Ramchand Oad James Prichett Terry Podmore Copyright by Adam Kent Prior 2010 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT WATER CONSERVATION METHODS TO CONSERVE THE HIGH PLAINS AQUIFER AND ARIKAREE RIVER BASIN: A CASE STUDY ON THE ARIKAREE RIVER Throughout the United States, and especially in Colorado, farmers confront the challenges of meeting water needs for crop production while trying to maintain natural habitats and conserve dwindling water supplies. The challenge of dividing limited resources creates a constant need for evaluation, research, and conservation of our valued water resources. The Arikaree River is a tributary of the Republican River on the Great Plains of Eastern Colorado. The river is groundwater dependent and receives flow from the underlying High Plains aquifer. The river alluvium has mature riparian communities of plains cottonwoods, habitat for threatened fish species such as the Hybognathus hankinsoni (Brassy Minnow), and habitat for many terrestrial invertebrates, sustained by water from the High Plains aquifer. In addition to the demands for maintenance of habitats, the surrounding, almost exclusively irrigated agricultural lands need water as well. The irrigation water supply is the groundwater pumped from the High Plains aquifer by high-capacity pumps. In recent years, the river became a series of disconnected pools or has dried up entirely during the late summer.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Selenium 1
    UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Selenium 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Arikaree River County: Cheyenne HUC 8: (In Kansas) 10250001 HUC 11 (HUC 14s): (In Kansas) 080 (030, 040 and 050) Drainage Area: 37 square miles in Kansas 1725 square miles total above sampling station Main Stem Segment: WQLS: 1 (Arikaree River) starting at the Kansas-Nebraska state line and traveling upstream through northwest Cheyenne County to the Kansas-Colorado state line (Figure 1). Tributaries: All tributaries located in Colorado, segment numbers unknown Horse Creek Sand Creek Gordon Creek Currie Creek Dugout Creek Hell Creek North Fork Arikaree River Designated Uses: Special Aquatic Life Support, Primary Contact Recreation (C), Domestic Water Supply; Food Procurement; Ground Water Recharge; Industrial Water Supply Use; Irrigation Use; Livestock Watering Use for Kansas Segment. Impaired Use: Special Aquatic Life Water Quality Standard: 5 µg/liter for Chronic Aquatic Life (KAR 28-16-28e(c)(2)(F)(ii) 1 In stream segments where background concentrations of naturally occurring substances, including chlorides, sulfates and selenium, exceed the water quality criteria listed in Table 1a of KAR 28-16- 28e(d), at ambient flow, the existing water quality shall be maintained, and the newly established numeric criteria shall be the background concentration, as defined in KAR 28-16-28b(e). Background concentrations shall be established using the methods outlined in the “Kansas implementation procedures: surface water,” dated June 1, 1999... (KAR 28-16-28e(b)(9)). (Figure 1- Land use in the Arikaree River Basin. Kansas irrigation wells are visible in the inset.
    [Show full text]
  • Flows and Recreational Floating on the Niobrara National Scenic River, Nebraska
    Flows and Recreational Floating on the Niobrara National Scenic River, Nebraska Photo credit: National Park Service Prepared for… Nebraska Game and Parks Commission 2200 No. 33rd St. ● Lincoln, Nebraska 68503 In cooperation with… National Park Service P.O. Box 591 ● O'Neill, Nebraska 68763 Nebraska Environmental Trust 700 S 16th Street ● Lincoln, Nebraska 68509 Prepared by… Doug Whittaker Ph.D. & Bo Shelby, Ph.D. Confluence Research and Consulting 3600 NW Thrush • Corvallis, Oregon 97331 6324 Red Tree Circle • Anchorage, Alaska 99507 April 2008 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... iv Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Methods............................................................................................................................... 2 Geographic Scope ........................................................................................................... 2 Review of Existing Information...................................................................................... 4 Recreation-Relevant Hydrology ..................................................................................... 4 Interviews with Experienced Resource Users................................................................. 4 Fieldwork .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Rivers and Beaver-Related
    THESIS RIVERS AND BEAVER-RELATED RESTORATION IN COLORADO Submitted by Julianne Scamardo Department of Geosciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2019 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Ellen Wohl Tim Covino Ryan Morrison Copyright by Julianne Eileen Scamardo 2019 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT RIVERS AND BEAVER-RELATED RESTORATION IN COLORADO Interest in beaver-related restoration, such as reintroduction and dam analogs, for repairing incised and degraded streams is apparent across the American West. North American beaver (Castor canadensis) were historically abundant across their ecological range, and headwater streams across the U.S. likely held many beaver dams in the channel and on the floodplains. Beaver dams can effectively trap sediment, water, and solutes, and a thriving beaver meadow can have implications for biodiversity and carbon storage. After historical declines in populations throughout the 19th and 20th century, enthusiasm for reintroduction and dam analogs has grown for naturally restoring degraded streams that once housed beaver. To guide enthusiasm in the State of Colorado, understanding (i) where reintroductions are viable and (ii) how beaver dam analogs change stream morphology and hydrology is critical. This study tackles those two objectives by modeling potential dam densities in 63 watersheds across Colorado as well as monitoring beaver dam analog restoration projects in two watersheds in the Colorado Front Range. While density models may not be accurate at small scales, regional patterns in dam density across Colorado suggest that many streams can still support beaver populations despite larger decreases from historic dam densities.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Index
    First Edition, Index revised Sept. 23, 2010 Populated Places~Sitios Poblados~Lieux Peuplés 1—24 Landmarks~Lugares de Interés~Points d’Intérêt 25—31 Native American Reservations~Reservas de Indios Americanos~Réserves d’Indiens d’Améreque 31—32 Universities~Universidades~Universités 32—33 Intercontinental Airports~Aeropuertos Intercontinentales~Aéroports Intercontinentaux 33 State High Points~Puntos Mas Altos de Estados~Les Plus Haut Points de l’État 33—34 Regions~Regiones~Régions 34 Land and Water~Tierra y Agua~Terre et Eau 34—40 POPULATED PLACES~SITIOS POBLADOS~LIEUX PEUPLÉS A Adrian, MI 23-G Albany, NY 29-F Alice, TX 16-N Afton, WY 10-F Albany, OR 4-E Aliquippa, PA 25-G Abbeville, LA 19-M Agua Prieta, Mex Albany, TX 16-K Allakaket, AK 9-N Abbeville, SC 24-J 11-L Albemarle, NC 25-J Allendale, SC 25-K Abbotsford, Can 4-C Ahoskie, NC 27-I Albert Lea, MN 19-F Allende, Mex 15-M Aberdeen, MD 27-H Aiken, SC 25-K Alberton, MT 8-D Allentown, PA 28-G Aberdeen, MS 21-K Ainsworth, NE 16-F Albertville, AL 22-J Alliance, NE 14-F Aberdeen, SD 16-E Airdrie, Can 8,9-B Albia, IA 19-G Alliance, OH 25-G Aberdeen, WA 4-D Aitkin, MN 19-D Albion, MI 23-F Alma, AR 18-J Abernathy, TX 15-K Ajo, AZ 9-K Albion, NE 16,17-G Alma, Can 30-C Abilene, KS 17-H Akhiok, AK 9-P ALBUQUERQUE, Alma, MI 23-F Abilene, TX 16-K Akiak, AK 8-O NM 12-J Alma, NE 16-G Abingdon, IL 20-G Akron, CO 14-G Aldama, Mex 13-M Alpena, MI 24-E Abingdon, VA Akron, OH 25-G Aledo, IL 20-G Alpharetta, GA 23-J 24,25-I Akutan, AK 7-P Aleknagik, AK 8-O Alpine Jct, WY 10-F Abiquiu, NM 12-I Alabaster,
    [Show full text]