Yes Means Yes” Means for New York Schools: the Positive Effects of New York’S Efforts to Combat Campus Sexual Assault Through Affirmative Consent
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
591 DELAMATER FINAL MIX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/27/2016 10:46 AM NOTE WHAT “YES MEANS YES” MEANS FOR NEW YORK SCHOOLS: THE POSITIVE EFFECTS OF NEW YORK’S EFFORTS TO COMBAT CAMPUS SEXUAL ASSAULT THROUGH AFFIRMATIVE CONSENT Chandler Delamater* INTRODUCTION In October 2014, Governor Andrew Cuomo announced a resolution passed by the State University of New York (SUNY) Board of Trustees establishing a comprehensive uniform sexual assault policy for the SUNY system, to be adopted by SUNY-operated schools by December 2014.1 Less than a year after instituting the SUNY policy, the Governor signed the “Enough is Enough” legislation2 into law, amending the Education Law to expand the policy and require that all public and private colleges and universities in New York “adopt a set of comprehensive procedures and guidelines”3 aimed at combatting campus sexual assault.4 Governor Cuomo’s actions came about in the midst of what he described as “an epidemic of sexual violence in this country that is truly disturbing and . plaguing our * Executive Editor for Notes and Comments, Albany Law Review; J.D. Candidate, Albany Law School, 2016; B.A. History, University of Florida, 2013. I would express my deepest gratitude to the members of the Albany Law Review, to Professor Dorothy Hill for her invaluable guidance and advice while writing this comment, and to my parents, Lock and Sherry, for their unending love, support, and encouragement. 1 Press Release, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor Cuomo Announces First-Ever Statewide, Uniform Policy to Combat Sexual Assault on New York College Campuses (Oct. 2, 2014), https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-cuomo-announces-first-ever-statewide- uniform-policy-combat-sexual-assault-new-york [hereinafter Uniform Policy to Combat Sexual Assault]. 2 S.B. 5965, 2015–2016 Leg., 238th Reg. Sess. (N.Y. 2015). 3 Press Release, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor Cuomo Signs “Enough Is Enough” Legislation to Combat Sexual Assault on College and University Campuses (July 7, 2015), https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-cuomo-signs-enough-enough-legislation-combat- sexual-assault-college-and-university [hereinafter “Enough is Enough”]. 4 See N.Y. S.B. 5965. 591 591 DELAMATER FINAL MIX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/27/2016 10:46 AM 592 Albany Law Review [Vol. 79.2 college campuses.”5 Epidemic is certainly an appropriate characterization of the current situation these colleges are facing. It is estimated that nearly 20 percent of college women have experienced some form of sexual assault.6 The issue has garnered a great deal of media and political attention as it has become apparent that many schools are failing to appropriately and meaningfully address the problem of sexual assault.7 These problems have been as prevalent in New York’s public and private institutions as they have across the country. In 2014, the United States Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”) released a list of fifty-five schools that were under investigation for violations under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 over their handling of sexual assault allegations made by students.8 The OCR identified four New York institutions that were under investigation: City University of New York Hunter College, SUNY at Binghamton, which are state-funded institutions, and Hobart and William Smith Colleges, as well as Sarah Lawrence College, which are privately funded.9 New York’s “Enough is Enough” Law was enacted to address the serious institutional difficulties that schools face in handling sexual assault complaints.10 Beginning on October 5, 2015, all schools in New York are required to amend sexual assault policies by adopting a “Sexual Assault Victims’ Bill of Rights,”11 a drug and alcohol amnesty policy,12 protocols to ensure confidentiality and emphasize a victim’s right to make both criminal and disciplinary complaints13 and annual campus climate assessments.14 Also included among the reforms are significant training and public awareness 5 Uniform Policy to Combat Sexual Assault, supra note 1. 6 CTRS. FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, Sexual Violence: Facts at a Glance (2012), http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/sv-datasheet-a.pdf. 7 See Mike Vilensky, Gov. Cuomo Plans ‘Yes Means Yes’ Policy for Sexual Interactions at College Campuses, WALL ST. J. (Jan. 17, 2015), http://www.wsj.com/articles/governor-andrew- cuomo-plans-yes-means-yes-policy-at-college-campuses-statewide-1421529943; “Enough is Enough”, supra note 3. 8 Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Educ., U.S. Department of Education Releases List of Higher Education Institutions with Open Title IX Sexual Violence Investigations (May 1, 2014), http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-releases-list-higher- education-institutions-open-title-i. 9 See id. 10 See “Enough is Enough”, supra note 3. 11 Act of July 7, 2015, ch. 76, § 1, 2015 N.Y. Sess. Laws 589, 592 (McKinney). 12 § 1, 2015 N.Y. Sess. Laws at 591–92. 13 § 1, 2015 N.Y. Sess. Laws at 592–96. 14 § 1, 2015 N.Y. Sess. Laws at 596. 591 DELAMATER FINAL MIX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/27/2016 10:46 AM 2015/2016] What ‘Yes Means Yes’ Means 593 requirements.15 The law substantially followed the policy adopted by the SUNY system nearly a year before.16 One of the most significant and controversial changes required under the law and the SUNY policy is the requirement that New York schools adopt an “affirmative consent” definition. All New York schools must now define “consent” as follows: “Affirmative consent is a knowing, voluntary, and mutual decision among all participants to engage in sexual activity. Consent can be given by words or actions, as long as those words or actions create clear permission regarding willingness to engage in the sexual activity. Silence or lack of resistance, in and of itself, does not demonstrate consent. The definition of consent does not vary based upon a participant’s sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.”17 New York schools are also required to include several guiding principles in codes of conduct: a. Consent to any sexual act or prior consensual sexual activity between or with any party does not necessarily constitute consent to any other sexual act. b. Consent is required regardless of whether the person initiating the act is under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol. c. Consent may be initially given but withdrawn at any time. d. Consent cannot be given when a person is incapacitated, which occurs when an individual lacks the ability to knowingly choose to participate in sexual activity. Incapacitation may be caused by the lack of consciousness or being asleep, being involuntarily restrained, or if an individual otherwise cannot consent. Depending on the degree of intoxication, someone who is under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicants may be incapacitated and therefore unable to consent. e. Consent cannot be given when it is the result of any coercion, intimidation, force, or threat of harm. f. When consent is withdrawn or can no longer be given, sexual 15 § 1, 2015 N.Y. Sess. Laws at 598–99. 16 Memorandum from Nancy L, Zimpher, Chancellor of the State Univ. of N.Y. to Members of the Bd. of Trs. 1–2 (Oct. 2, 2014), http://www.suny.edu/media/suny/content- assets/documents/boardoftrustees/memos/Sexual-Assault-Response-Prevention- REVISED.pdf. 17 N.Y. EDUC. LAW § 6441(1) (McKinney 2015). 591 DELAMATER FINAL MIX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/27/2016 10:46 AM 594 Albany Law Review [Vol. 79.2 activity must stop.18 This Comment focuses on New York’s state-wide adoption of an affirmative consent standard in its colleges, and its potential effectiveness for combating the epidemic of sexual violence against women.19 Its focus is to examine the usefulness of such a standard in the college disciplinary context. Part I explains the context and seriousness of sexual assault on college campuses. Part II discusses Title IX, the Clery Act, and the Campus SaVE Act, the federal laws governing the way colleges handle sexual assault. Part III details the evolution of rape laws over time, and explains the way that consent has traditionally been viewed by the law. Part IV describes the academic and legal theories behind affirmative consent, considering the arguments of both its proponents and its critics. Part V argues that an affirmative consent standard is an appropriate and effective reform within the college disciplinary system, that, when implemented correctly, has the potential to protect students from both sexual assault and its potential ramifications. I. CURRENT SEXUAL ASSAULT ISSUE WITHIN COLLEGES With nearly one in five women experiencing some form of sexual assault while in college,20 there is no doubt that campus sexual assault is among the most pressing concerns facing academic institutions. Sexual assault is grossly under-reported, with less than 5 percent actually reported to law enforcement officials.21 The vast majority of sexual assaults are committed by an acquaintance of the victim, giving rise to new concerns about standards of consent.22 With many sexual assault complaints, the case hinges on whether the sex was consensual, not whether it occurred, leaving the parties locked in a he-said-she-said battle. In such cases, the outcome of the case often turns on the question of “consent,” the answer to which may vary radically depending on how that term is defined. This was true in what was probably the most widely publicized 18 N.Y. EDUC. LAW § 6441(2)(a)–(f) (McKinney 2015). 19 Though my central focus is on sexual assaults perpetrated against women, it is worth noting that New York’s affirmative consent definition is gender neutral and protects both unconsenting women and men equally.