DOCSLIB.ORG

The Christ of Saint Vincent and Saint Louise

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Christ of Saint Vincent and Saint Louise Vincentian Heritage Journal Volume 19 Issue 1 Article 3 Spring 1998 Christological Aspects of Vincentian Leadership: The Christ of Saint Vincent and Saint Louise Kathryn LaFleur S.P. Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/vhj Recommended Citation LaFleur, Kathryn S.P. (1998) "Christological Aspects of Vincentian Leadership: The Christ of Saint Vincent and Saint Louise," Vincentian Heritage Journal: Vol. 19 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/vhj/vol19/iss1/3 This Articles is brought to you for free and open access by the Vincentian Journals and Publications at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vincentian Heritage Journal by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 29 Christological Aspects Of Vincentian Leadership: The Christ of Saint Vincent and Saint Louise BY KATHRYN LAFLEUR, S.P. Introductory Remarks: I need to say that in reflecting on the Vincentian tradition, I will speak of both Saint Vincent and Saint Louise because I am convinced that for us today it is the complementarity of their individual and shared spirituality and mission that give us the legacy of the Christological aspects of their leadership. This, I think, is one of their great gifts to us and to our times. "WHO DO YOU SAY THAT I AM?" (MT. 16:13-18) When Jesus came to the neighborhood of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples this question: Who do people say that the Son of Man is? They replied, "Some say John the Baptizer, others Elijah, still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets." "And you," he said to them, "who do you say that I am?" "You are the Messiah," Simon Peter answered, "the Son of the living God!" Jesus replied, "Blest are you, Simon son of John! No mere person has revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father." This question which Jesus posed to his disciples is a question that at some point challenges the heart and spirit of every Christian. For each of us it is a question that if entered into deeply may call us to re­ evaluate our ministry, our leadership, our lifestyle; it might well bid us to a greater depth of conversion in our lives. Indeed, for both Vincent de Paul and Louise de Marillac, the personal lived reality of the unfolding mystery of the answer to Jesus' question "Who do you say that I am" became the focus and force of their spirituality, and in turn of their mission. We are invited to reflect on two aspects of this gospel question as related to our Vincentian tradition: Who was Christ for Saint Vincent and for Saint Louise, and what perspectives of Christian leadership did Vincent and Louise emulate? 30 To embark upon this journey into the spirituality of Saint Vincent and Saint Louise, I invite you to consider with me, first the spiritual milieu in which they lived, then to reflect briefly on who Christ was for Saint Vincent, who Christ was for Saint Louise, and finally to consider the legacy of some principles of the Vincentian tradition that animated their Christian leadership. THE SPIRITUAL MILIEU OF VINCENT AND LOUISE: Vincent (1581-1660); Louise (1591-1660) The seventeenth century in which Saint Vincent and Saint Louise lived is known historically as Le grand siecle, the great century; so too it might be termed Un grand siecle,a great century of spirituality. The spiritual framework in which Vincent de Paul and Louise de Marillac lived in seventeenth century France was that which is known as the French School of Spirituality. It was during this century that numerous saints made outstanding contributions to the field of spiri­ tuality and during it that the division of theology and spirituality which had occurred during the scholastic period was reunited into an integrated whole. Major figures of this period include Saint Francis de Sales, Saint Jane de Chantal, Pierre Cardinal de Berulle, Charles de Condren, Jean­ Jacques Olier, Saint John Eudes, Pere Lallement, Blessed Marie of the Incarnation, Blessed Madeleine of Saint Joseph, Saint Margaret Mary Alacoque, Saint Louis Marie de Montfort, Saint Jean-Baptist de la Salle and of course Saint Louise de Marillac and Saint Vincent de Paul. As well, the seventeenth century was a period in which lay lead­ ership in spirituality was prevalent with such persons as Mme. Acarie and Michel de Marillac, uncle of Louise. Fruits of the period would include renewal of laity and clergy, foundation of seminaries, parish missions, spiritual direction, and the emergence of congregations de­ voted to apostolic works both within and beyond France. Father Raymond Deville in his book, L'ecolefranr;aise de spiritualite posits that a spirituality or spiritual tradition is a certain manner of hearing and living the gospel. This is conditioned by a time, a milieu, and some influential principles. This particular way of hearing and living the gospel is incarnated in a group of people and prolonged through history, enriching or impoverishing itself. 1 1 Raymond Deville, L'ecolefranraise de spiritualite - Bibliotheque d'Histoire du Christianisrne, n.11 (Paris: Desclee, 1987), 102. 31 Deville suggests that a particular school of spirituality or tradition has certain aspects of faith and life in the Spirit which it emphasizes and is distinguished by a certain manner of prayer and a certain approach to mission. The basic aspects of faith and life in the Spirit which the French School of Spirituality emphasized are: Trinitarianism, Christocentricism, Marian, Pastoral and Ecclesial. It is an accepted fact that the major initiator in the development of the French School of Spirituality was Pierre Cardinal de Berulle. The most characteristic principle of Berulle's spirituality was its Christocentricism, which focused on the Incarnate Word, Jesus. Through Jesus' humanity, persons enter into a new order. Humanity is deified through Jesus, who became man to make us gods. For Berulle the pre-eminent state of the human Jesus was that of his servitude because in emptying himself of his divinity to become hu­ man, he assumed the state of one who was to be God's servant. It is Jesus who has come to heal the rupture of the relationship between God and humans. He, as the perfect adorer and servant, incorporates humans into his life and love and empowers them to imitate him in adoration and servitude of God. For the French School, experience of Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Word of God was fundamental to the reunion of spirituality and theology which Berulle stressed and was central to all the ensuing doctrine of the school and its lived-out experience. Hence, praxis was regaining its importance in the field of theology. For Vincent de Paul particularly, the lived reality-the experience of Christ-was more important than theory. As we have heard, Deville says that a spirituality or spiritual tradition is a particular way of hearing and living the gospel which is incarnated in a group of people and prolonged through history, en­ riching or impoverishing itself.2 How has the gospel been incarnated in the Vincentian tradition? Both Vincent and Louise exhibited in varying degrees, but with their own nuances, the principles of the French School of Spirituality and left to us the heritage of a Vincentian tradition-a certain manner of hearing and living the gospel, a certain approach to mission. 2 It is essential to recall that the French School of Spirituality is the term applied to the doctrine of spirituality developed in France during the Seventeenth Century. In the strict sense it is limited to the disciples of Berulie who had an awareness of his originality and who followed the themes characteristic of his doctrine. 32 For our purposes we will focus on only one of these principles, the Christological aspect of their spirituality. Let us begin with Saint Vincent. Reverend Robert Maloney, C.M., states: "Vincent does not speak or write about Christology as such, but he often speaks and writes of Christ. Even more clearly, he develops a way of 'living' Christ and teaches it to his followers." 3 In keeping with the French School of Spirituality, Vincent's Christ begins with the Trinity. Vincent's trinitarian theocentricism was ex­ pressed in his constant desire to do the Will of God, his complete trust in the Providence of God, his sensitivity to the Spirit and his imitation of Jesus. For Vincent, belief in the mystery of the Holy Trinity was necessary for salvation and he found and knew "his Christ" only in the union of the Son with the Father. 4 That the Trinity was central for Vincent is seen in his placing his congregation under the patronage of the Trinity and his frequent reference to the unity of the Trinity as the best model for a life of unity within Community. 5 From within the Trinity, Christ was the foundational focus of Vincent's active spirituality, hence his Christocentricism. 6 In Jesus Christ, Vincent saw the Savior come to do the Father's Will which He accomplished through His self-emptying service to the poor and the salvation of all through His death on the cross. This mission of Christ the evangelizer fulfilling the Father's Will, was for Vincent, the begin­ ning, the direction and the end of his spirituality concretized in deeds of charity and justice. Dodin writes: The Christ whom Vincent contemplated and adored is not a representation of an eternal truth, but a living hu­ man being united with humankind in history, on a mis­ sion from his Father to save humanity.7 3 Robert P Maloney, C.M., The Way of St .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • St. Augustine and the Doctrine of the Mystical Body of Christ Stanislaus J
    ST. AUGUSTINE AND THE DOCTRINE OF THE MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST STANISLAUS J. GRABOWSKI, S.T.D., S.T.M. Catholic University of America N THE present article a study will be made of Saint Augustine's doc­ I trine of the Mystical Body of Christ. This subject is, as it will be later pointed out, timely and fruitful. It is of unutterable importance for the proper and full conception of the Church. This study may be conveniently divided into four parts: (I) A fuller consideration of the doctrine of the Mystical Body of Christ, as it is found in the works of the great Bishop of Hippo; (II) a brief study of that same doctrine, as it is found in the sources which the Saint utilized; (III) a scrutiny of the place that this doctrine holds in the whole system of his religious thought and of some of its peculiarities; (IV) some consideration of the influence that Saint Augustine exercised on the development of this particular doctrine in theologians and doctrinal systems. THE DOCTRINE St. Augustine gives utterance in many passages, as the occasion de­ mands, to words, expressions, and sentences from which we are able to infer that the Church of his time was a Church of sacramental rites and a hierarchical order. Further, writing especially against Donatism, he is led Xo portray the Church concretely in its historical, geographical, visible form, characterized by manifest traits through which she may be recognized and discerned from false chuiches. The aspect, however, of the concept of the Church which he cherished most fondly and which he never seems tired of teaching, repeating, emphasizing, and expound­ ing to his listeners is the Church considered as the Body of Christ.1 1 On St.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary in the Doctrine of Berulle on the Mysteries of Christ Vincent R
    Marian Studies Volume 36 Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth National Convention of The Mariological Society of America Article 11 held in Dayton, Ohio 1985 Mary in the Doctrine of Berulle on the Mysteries of Christ Vincent R. Vasey Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_studies Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Vasey, Vincent R. (1985) "Mary in the Doctrine of Berulle on the Mysteries of Christ," Marian Studies: Vol. 36, Article 11. Available at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_studies/vol36/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Marian Library Publications at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marian Studies by an authorized editor of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Vasey: Mary in the Doctrine of Berulle MARY IN THE DOCTRINE OF BERULLE ON THE MYSTERIES OF CHRIST Two monuments Berulle left the Church, aere perennina: more enduring than bronze, are his writings and his Congrega­ tion of the Oratory. He took part in the great controversies of his time, religious and political, but his figure takes its greatest lus­ ter with the passing of years because of his spiritual work and the influence he exerts in the Church by those endued with his teaching. From his integrated life originated both his works and his institution; that is why both his writings and the Oratory are intimately connected. His writings in their final synthesis-and we are concerned above all with the culmination of his contem­ plation and study-center about Christ, and his restoration of the priesthood centers about Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Amb-CF] Ambrose of Milan, on the Christian Faith
    Bibliography Ancient Sources/Dogmatic Works [Ale-LAT] Alexander of Alexandria, Letter to Alexander of Thessalonica [Amb-CF] Ambrose of Milan, On the Christian Faith [ANPF] Ante-Nicene Fathers, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers (38 vols.), Roberts, Alexander, Donaldson, James (eds.), 1885, Hendrickson Publishers [Aqu-SCG] Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentes [Ar-LAA] Arius, Letter to Alexander of Alexandria [Ar-LC] Arius, Letter to the Emperor Constantine [Ar-LEN] Arius, Letter to Eusebius of Nicomedia [Ar-TH] Arius, Thalia [Ari-BW] Aristotle, The Basic Works of Aristotle (Ed. Richard McKeon), The Modern Library, 2001 (1941) [Aris-APOL] Aristides, The Apology of Aristides [Ath-AS] Athanasius, Letters to Serapion Concerning the Holy Spirit [Ath-CG] Athanasius of Alexandria, Contra Gentes [Ath-DI] Athanasius of Alexandria, De Incarnatione Verbi Dei [Ath-DS] Athanasius of Alexandria, De Synodis [Ath-OCA] Athanasius of Alexandria, Orationes contra Arianos [Athen-PC] Athenagoras of Athens, A Plea for the Christians [Athen-RD] Athenagoras of Athens, The Resurrection of the Dead [Aug-DFC] Augustine of Hippo, On the Faith and the Creed [Aug-DT] Augustine of Hippo, De Trinitate 1 [BAR] The Epistle of Barnabas [Bas-DSS] Basil of Caesarea, De Spiritu Sancto [Bas-EP] Basil of Caesarea, Select Epistles [Bon-DQT] Bonaventure, Disputed Questions on the Mystery of the Trinity [Bon-SJG] Bonaventure, The Soul’s Journey into God [CCC] Catechism of the Catholic Church, Image, 1997 [CleRom-COR] Clement of Rome, First Epistle to the Corinthians [CF] The Christian Faith in the Doctrinal Documents of the Catholic Church, J. Neuner, S.J., J. Dupuis, S.J., Jacques Dupuis (ed.), Alba House, 2001 (seventh revised and enlarged edition) [Cyr-CL] Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures [DID] The Didache [DIOG] The Epistle to Diognetus [ECW] Early Christian Writings, Staniforth, Maxwell (tr.), Louth, Andrew (ed.), Penguin, 1987 [GPTA] Greek Philosophy: Thales to Aristotle, Allen, R.
    [Show full text]
  • And Post-Vatican Ii (1943-1986 American Mariology)
    FACULTAS THEOLOGICA "MARIANUM" MARIAN LffiRARY INSTITUTE (UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON) TITLE: THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF BIBLICAL MARIOLOGY PRE- AND POST-VATICAN II (1943-1986 AMERICAN MARIOLOGY) A thesis submitted to The Theological Faculty "Marianwn" In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Licentiate of Sacred Theology By: James J. Tibbetts, SFO Director: Reverend Bertrand A. Buby, SM Thesis at: Marian Library Institute Dayton, Ohio, USA 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 The Question of Development I. Introduction - Status Questionis 1 II. The Question of Historical Development 2 III. The Question of Biblical Theological Development 7 Footnotes 12 Chapter 2 Historical Development of Mariology I. Historical Perspective Pre- to Post Vatican Emphasis A. Mariological Movement - Vatican I to Vatican II 14 B. Pre-Vatican Emphasis on Scripture Scholarship 16 II. Development and Decline in Mariology 19 III. Development and Controversy: Mary as Church vs. Mediatrix A. The Mary-Church Relationship at Vatican II 31 B. Mary as Mediatrix at Vatican II 37 c. Interpretations of an Undeveloped Christology 41 Footnotes 44 Chapter 3 Development of a Biblical Mariology I. Biblical Mariology A. Development towards a Biblical Theology of Mary 57 B. Developmental Shift in Mariology 63 c. Problems of a Biblical Mariology 67 D. The Place of Mariology in the Bible 75 II. Symbolism, Scripture and Marian Theology A. The Meaning of Symbol 82 B. Marian Symbolism 86 c. Structuralism and Semeiotics 94 D. The Development of Two Schools of Thought 109 Footnotes 113 Chapter 4 Comparative Development in Mariology I. Comparative Studies - Scriptural Theology 127 A. Richard Kugelman's Commentary on the Annunciation 133 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Resurrection?
    Why Resurrection? Why Resurrection? An Introduction to the Belief in the Afterlife in Judaism and Christianity Carlos Blanco WHY RESURRECTION? An Introduction to the Belief in the Afterlife in Judaism and Christianity Copyright © 2011 Carlos Blanco. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in critical publications or reviews, no part of this book may be reproduced in any man- ner without prior written permission from the publisher. Write: Permissions, Wipf and Stock Publishers, 199 W. 8th Ave., Suite 3, Eugene, OR 97401. Scripture taken from the New King James Version®. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Pickwick Publications An Imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers 199 W. 8th Ave., Suite 3 Eugene, OR 97401 www.wipfandstock.com isbn 13: 978-1-60899-772-5 Cataloging-in-Publication data: Blanco, Carlos. Why resurrection? : an introduction to the belief in the afterlife in Judaism and Christianity / Carlos Blanco. xvi + 226 p. ; 23 cm. Including bibliographical references and index. isbn 13: 978-1-60899-772-5 1. Resurrection (Jewish Theology). 2. Resurrection—History of Doctrines—Early Church, ca. 30–600. I. Title. bt872 .b66 2011 Manufactured in the U.S.A. Contents Acknowledgments • vii List of Abbreviations • viii Introduction • ix 1 Theodicy: Philosophy of Religion and the Problem of Evil • 1 2 History and Meaning • 45 3 The Apocalyptic Conception of History, Evil, and Eschatology • 76 4 Death • 137 5 The Kingdom of God • 182 Bibliography • 217 Acknowledgments his book would not have been possible without the help of Tmany people from whose teaching and direct advice I have greatly profited.
    [Show full text]
  • August 31, 1965 Iii
    D.S. I THE INFLUENCE OF THE FRENCH SCWOL OF SPIRITUALITY ON THE WRITINGS OF SUNT LOUIS MARIE DE }KJNTFURT by Sister ?1all'Y IAwrence Corv'1, D.W., M.A. A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University in Partial FultUlment of the Re­ quirements tor the Degree of Master of Arts Milwaukee. Wisconsin August 31, 1965 iii / PRI1:FACE The problem on hand. is to ascertain the 1nfiuence of the French School ot Spil"1tuality on the mtingS ot Saint !cuts Marie de M:>nt­ tort. Granted that traces of the teaching ot this school, as weU as ot the French Ignatian School and various Illinor figures are present in the wrks ot Montfort, can he notwithstanding be considered an onginal writer and tounder ot a new sc1'!ool ot spiritual thinking? In this the­ sis, having first treated o~ , MOpttort"s major themes and then examined the extent' to which his writings were influenced b.Y his predecessors in France, especiall.y B4nille, I propose to reply to the foregoing question in the atfirmative. At this time, I Wish to acknowledge the kind and constructive criticism of Father WUliam J . Kelly, S.J., ot the Theology Department of };arquette Univel"Sit;r who guid$d the writing ot this thesis; and the coopel"ati.on ot :Father BernaJXl Cooke, S.J., Head ot the Theology Depart­ ment , and ot !bctor Riohard Schneido1", member ot the 'i'heology Depart­ ment, who With Father Kelly have constituted a committee ot three tor the reading of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Apocalypticism, the Year 1000, and the Medieval Roots of the Ecological Crisis
    Apocalypticism, the Year 1000, and the Medieval Roots of the Ecological Crisis Mario Baghos Introduction1 … the very act, the hubristic intent, of placing man in charge of nature caused reverberations that have not yet ceased.2 When Mircea Eliade undertook his groundbreaking work in the history of religions, he was partly concerned to address the rise of the historicist mindset of modern people, who, for centuries, have anthropocentrically construed themselves apart from the natural or cosmic environment. There is much merit to Eliade’s position, which I employ and, together with insights from Alexandru Mironescu, Richard Landes, and Georges Duby, elaborate upon, in order to locate the anthropocentrically motivated disjuncture between nature and history in the early medieval period in an attempt to demonstrate that the current ecological crisis has its antecedents there. Of course, the causal link between the scientific and technological advancements in the Middle Ages and the ecological crisis of our times has already been explored by Lynn White in ‘The Historical Roots of the Ecological Crisis’. White, however, identified the problem as an anthropocentrism inherent to Christianity; an anthropocentrism only contradicted in the ministry of St Francis of Assisi in the thirteenth Mario Baghos is Lecturer in Church History at St Andrew’s Greek Orthodox Theological College in Sydney, and is an Executive Member for the Sydney branch of the Centre for Millennial Studies. 1 This article is the outcome of two conference papers. The first was delivered at the Studies in Religion Research Seminars at the University of Sydney under the title ‘Anthropocentrism and the Dissociation Between Cosmos and History: its Impact on our Study of the Past’ on 4 April 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of Theology: Structure, System, and Ratio A. N
    The Architecture of Theology: Structure, System, and Ratio A. N. Williams Print publication date: 2011 Print ISBN-13: 9780199236367 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2011 Página 1 de 225 Preface The pages that follow represent an essay in the reading of Christian theology. The reading they offer attempts to shed light on the Christian tradition by viewing it through a particular lens. All lenses have the potential to distort what they attempt to magnify or clarify, and this one does not purport to be an exception. I do not suggest this interpretation is the only way of reading Christian theology, or even the best way, but offer it only as parsing of the tradition that may account for some of its salient features in the forms it has taken down the centuries. I have attempted to illustrate this reading by reference to specific authors and texts (Chapter 3 is wholly devoted to an intensive reading of a small selection of texts). To give a fuller illustration would have been eminently possible, had space been no consideration. As it is, I have focused on a fairly small number of authors, but have within that straitened compass attempted to include authors from a variety of periods, writing in different styles, and with different theological convictions. I can only hope that readers who find some interest in the suggestions made here will be prompted to turn afresh to their own reading of theology, querying both well-known texts and new ones in light of them. My purpose is not to persuade readers of the inevitability of my own ideas, but to foster a richer dialogue between the reader and the extraordinary panoply of texts that comprise the Christian theological tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relation of the Doctrine of the Word of God to the Doctrine of the Imago Dei
    SUBJECT OP THESIS t The Relation of the Doctrine of the Word of God to the Doctrine of the Imago Dei- A Study in the Theology of Professor Karl Earth - by - IVOR FRANCIS MORRIS, New College,, Edinburgh* This thesis was submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Divinity, Edinburgh University, in September of the year 1941* xsus TABLE 0 P CONTENTS . Page 1. introduction, (pp. 1-4). 2. PART ! THE DOCTRINAL IMPLICATIONS OP THE ANALOGIA ENTIS (pp. 5*£7). Chapter 1. An introductory consideration of the Analogia Entis ... Chapter 2* A modern dialectic Presentation of the Analogia Entis ... 10 Chapter 3. The syncretistic Argument 13 Chapter 4. A critical View of the Analogia Entis, in the light of the Imago Dei 18 3. PART 2. THEOCENTRICISM IN THEOLOGY (pp. 28-43). Chapter 1. Introduction ... 28 Chapter 2. Wobbermin's religio-psychological Circle and his Divergence from the theology of Barth ... 31 Chapter 3. Schaeder'3 Doctrine of Faith- Mysticism ... 37 Chapter 4. A Criticism of Theocenticism 41 4. PART 3. THE PROBLEM OP THE POINT OP CONTACT (pp.49-73). A Study in the theological Cleavage between Karl Barth and Emil Brunner. Chapter 1. Summary and Transition to Brunner's Standpoint ... 49 Chapter 2. The Doctrine of the negative point of Contact ... 52 Chapter 3. Brunner's natural Theology 56 Chapter 4. Brunner's Criticism of Barth 64 Chapter 5. A Criticism of Brunner's natural Theology ... 67 5. PART 4, THE THEOLOGICAL AND BIBLICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE IMAGO DEI (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Supersessionism and the Dilemma of Dialogue in Jos Nigeria: Exploring Panikkar’S Dialogical Dialogue As a Paradigm for Interreligious Dialogue Martin Ahiaba
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fall 2016 Christian Supersessionism and the Dilemma of Dialogue in Jos Nigeria: Exploring Panikkar’s Dialogical Dialogue as a Paradigm for Interreligious Dialogue Martin Ahiaba Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Ahiaba, M. (2016). Christian Supersessionism and the Dilemma of Dialogue in Jos Nigeria: Exploring Panikkar’s Dialogical Dialogue as a Paradigm for Interreligious Dialogue (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/59 This One-year Embargo is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHRISTIAN SUPERSESSIONISM AND THE DILEMMA OF DIALOGUE IN JOS NIGERIA: EXPLORING PANIKKAR’S DIALOGICAL DIALOGUE AS A PARADIGM FOR INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Martin Akowe Ahiaba December 2016 Copyright by Martin Akowe Ahiaba 2016 CHRISTIAN SUPERSESSIONISM AND THE DILEMMA OF DIALOGUE IN JOS NIGERIA: EXPLORING PANIKKAR’S DIALOGICAL DIALOGUE AS A PARADIGM FOR INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE By Martin Akowe Ahiaba Approved November 9, 2016 ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. Gerald Boodoo, Ph.D. Dr. Anna Floerke Scheid, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Theology Associate Professor of Theology (Committee Member) (Committee Member) ________________________________ Dr. Marinus Iwuchukwu, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Theology (Committee Director) ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. James Swindal, Ph.D. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Church, World and the Christian Life: Practical-Prophetic Ecclesiology 3
    Church, World and the Christian Life This book argues that modern ecclesiology exhibits two unfortunate tendencies: it describes the church in ideal terms, rather than directly addressing the problems of its everyday, sinful activity; and it undermines the distinctiveness of the church and its way of life. The book analyzes the impact of pluralism and inclusivism upon ecclesiology, and draws upon von Balthasar’s theodramatic theory, MacIntyre’s theory of traditional inquiry, postmodern critiques of humanism, and postmodern ethnography to develop a more flexible and concrete ecclesiology that can better address the practical and pastoral needs of the church. This alternative ecclesiology strongly affirms the need for the church to debate with those who challenge its claims and their embodiment, both from within and externally. The book concludes by discussing how the church may construct its own theological forms of historical, sociological and ethnographic analysis of both the church and society. Nicholas M. Healy is Associate Professor of Theology and Religious Studies at St. John’s University, New York. He is a member of the American Academy of Religion, the Catholic Theological Society of America, the Canadian Theological Society, and the Karl Barth Society. Cambridge Studies in Christian Doctrine Edited by Professor Colin Gunton, King’s College London Professor Daniel W.Hardy, University of Cambridge Cambridge Studies in Christian Doctrine is an important series which aims to engage critically with the traditional doctrines of Christianity, and at the same time to locate and make sense of them within a secular context. Without losing sight of the authority of scripture and the traditions of the church, the books in this series will subject pertinent dogmas and credal statements to careful scrutiny, analyzing them in light of the insights of both church and society, and will thereby practise theology in the fullest sense of the word.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Pluralism and the Catholic Church: Lonergan's Method and the Jacques Dupuis Controversy
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2013 Religious Pluralism and the Catholic Church: Lonergan's Method and the Jacques Dupuis Controversy Andrea J. Stapleton Berger Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Stapleton Berger, Andrea J., "Religious Pluralism and the Catholic Church: Lonergan's Method and the Jacques Dupuis Controversy" (2013). Dissertations. 734. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/734 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2013 Andrea J. Stapleton Berger LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO RELIGIOUS PLURALISM AND THE CATHOLIC CHURCH: LONERGAN’S METHOD AND THE JACQUES DUPUIS CONTROVERSY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN THEOLOGY BY ANDREA JAY STAPLETON BERGER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2013 Copyright by Andrea Stapleton Berger, 2013 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I will forever carry in my heart enormous gratitude for the many people who have inspired, supported, and guided me to the completion of this project. I first owe a great debt to the instructors who have encouraged me and helped me find my passion and hone my strengths as a scholar. I will be forever grateful for the encouragement of David Stagaman, S.J.
    [Show full text]