OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard) Ad Hoc Committee on a Bill of Rights OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard) Mr Dermot Nesbitt 15 October 2020 NORTHERN IRELAND ASSEMBLY Ad Hoc Committee on a Bill of Rights Mr Dermot Nesbitt 15 October 2020 Members present for all or part of the proceedings: Ms Emma Sheerin (Chairperson) Mr Mike Nesbitt (Deputy Chairperson) Ms Paula Bradshaw Mr Mark Durkan Miss Michelle McIlveen Mr Christopher Stalford Mr John O'Dowd Witnesses: Mr Dermot Nesbitt Ulster Unionist Party The Chairperson (Ms Sheerin): Dermot Nesbitt joins us in person to give a briefing on "particular circumstances". Welcome, Dermot, how are you? Mr Dermot Nesbitt (Ulster Unionist Party): Hello, Madam Chair. The Chairperson (Ms Sheerin): Do you want a round of introductions before you start your briefing? Mr D Nesbitt: I am ready, once I unmask. I recognise a few faces — "Oh dear", says I. Hi, Paula, it has been a long time. The Chairperson (Ms Sheerin): Dermot, thanks very much for joining us this afternoon. We all have your written submission, which is useful and all-encompassing. Would you like to begin? Mr D Nesbitt: OK. I see that we have two members on screen. The Chairperson (Ms Sheerin): We do: John O'Dowd and Mark Durkan. Mr D Nesbitt: Hi, John and Mark. Mr O'Dowd: Hi, Dermot. Mr Durkan: Hi, Dermot. Mr D Nesbitt: OK, I am ready to go. I wish to make a couple of introductory comments before I proceed with my main briefing. Paragraph 2 of my submission quotes Professor Brice Dickson, who, when chair of the Human Rights Commission, said: 1 "We are all familiar with the phenomenon of politicians taking a view of human rights which happens to accord with their personal political persuasions rather than with a more independent analysis." At the outset, I wish to say that, during this process since 1998, I have endeavoured to ground my work in international standards and international human rights. I have tried to make my maxim the plain meaning of the language: what it means, and what we should do. I have tried to be objective and evidence-based, which is why I use quotations extensively in my submission, including some from what I have written. I firmly believe that, if we deal with this difficult issue in the phrasing of international law, we remove from the discussion the local lingo and the political lingo. That is what I have been doing from the outset. Therefore, I welcome cross-party questioning of my submission on the basis of that premise. I intend to speak briefly on three aspects. I will put this in context: what is that we are about. I will look at what the two key players, namely the Human Rights Commission and the two Governments, have or have not done. Then, I will give a summary of my comments at the end of my submission. In the talks process, there were three strands: North/South, east-west and within Northern Ireland. A further strand of cross-strand issues cut across the three strands, and I was the lead person from the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) on that. I do not deny that I am a unionist — not at all — but that is different from what I will try to articulate to you. A key issue was identity. Who could I use to better identify that problem than Senator George Mitchell, the chairman of the all-party talks in 1998? He was very clear: in 2019, he said that identity remains a threat to stability and that there must be a clear commitment to address this matter. Paragraph 8 of my submission quotes a 'Belfast Telegraph' editorial: "If this is to be a shared space then respective identities must be respected." There is the word "identity" cropping up, not from a certain perspective but from a general position. Therefore, the question is this: what rights do we need to address that issue? In 1996, there was an election to a forum, from which the participants in the talks came. At that time, the Irish Government sponsored a Forum for Peace and Reconciliation to give advice to the participants, and they brought in international experts to formulate that advice. I quote extensively from two of those experts to give international context. Asbjørn Eide is viewed as a leading international expert. He was an active member of a committee in Norway and of a United Nations subcommission. What did he say? He said that we should establish the problem. He said that the problem that is often the most difficult to resolve is that you have two groups with an ethnic dimension who compete and conflict over the same territory, and, when two ethnic groupings conflict over the same territory, they say that they are discriminated against and treated as second-class citizens. They seek recognition of parity of identity and parity of esteem. That is what he said, and those words found their way into paragraph 4 of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement. He also said that what the two groups may have wished for, apart from that, was for separation, autonomy or merger with a neighbouring state. We recognise those dynamics in the Northern Ireland problem. He also said was that it was not a unique problem and that very few countries have a population with homogenous ethnicity. It is not a unique problem. The dynamics are there, they are clear, and Northern Ireland fits within those dynamics. Where do we go from there? What is the solution? Asbjørn Eide said: "the Council of Europe adopted the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities." He described that as the first multilateral hard law. Hard law means that any country that ratifies it must subscribe to giving submissions on how it has complied with that law. This was the first multilateral hard law dealing exclusively with minority rights. He also said that it went further than any previous international instrument. That was a substantial one: it was the first one, and it went further than anywhere else. 2 Let us not look only at what Asbjørn Eide said. I will quote from another Forum for Peace and Reconciliation document, this one written by Professors Boyle, Campbell, and Hadden. I am very conscious that the late Professor Boyle was a leading activist in the civil rights movement in the 1960s. So, I am not quoting from the unionist persona, as it were; I am trying to be genuinely objective. What did they say? There is a quote in paragraph 14 of my submission. They said that whilst "individual rights" were in the European Convention, community rights must also be addressed, and they suggested that those may best be addressed by incorporating the framework convention within a bill of rights. There it is — simple — in 1996. They also said that all these rights were now enshrined in international law and that it was not for us to barter over which bit we accepted and which bit we did not. Rather, they were there to be subscribed to. I wrote this briefing in May 2020, and, as we know — I smile as I say this — over the summer, international law has featured everywhere, from Nancy Pelosi to all over the place, "We must subscribe to international law; we cannot do anything other". "Gee whiz", says I, "It is wonderful to hear them say it"; whereas I have been saying for quite a long time that we must subscribe to international law. So, there it is. At the time, I was a member of the Standing Advisory Commission on Human Rights (SACHR), which was succeeded by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission (NIHRC). SACHR got involved in this as well. So, I reflected on these submissions, and I agreed with them: they were the correct, balanced way forward. It required compromise from both sides. It required some pragmatism if we were to make progress. I wrote in September 1996: "Were all participants in the Talks process to abide by the international consensus as to how to solve our problem of a divided society, progress would be made." In June 1997, I challenged the Government, through a platform article in a local paper, to ratify this convention, which they were not doing; they were ignoring it. My article said that it should be within a bill of rights and that the European Convention and the framework convention gave the European model for solving this problem. Again, I was giving the international perspective. Finally — I smile at this; I really do — in January 1998, when the Westminster Government ratified it, I wrote that this represented, potentially, the most significant development. The word "potentially" is interesting because that means it developing into something in the future. Had somebody told me then that, 22 years later, I would still be looking for it to be developed, I would have said, "Catch yourself on, mate". I repeat: this is, potentially, the most significant way forward. What is the framework convention? I will address that so that it is on the record and you get a flavour of it. It prohibits discrimination, preserves cultural identity and promotes mutual respect for all. Members of a minority community can assemble, associate and have freedom of thought and religion; they can communicate in any language; and they can communicate in the media — publicly, privately, in writing and orally. They are not precluded from anything. They can display signs privately, and they can display street names. They can use their own name. On education, apart from the recognition of the right to education, members of a minority community can be educated in the minority language.
Recommended publications
  • Peter Robinson DUP Reg Empey UUP Robin Newton DUP David Walter Ervine PUP Naomi Rachel Long Alliance Michael Stewart Copeland UUP
    CANDIDATES ELECTED TO THE NORTHERN IRELAND ASSEMBLY 26 NOVEMBER 2003 Belfast East: Peter Robinson DUP Reg Empey UUP Robin Newton DUP David Walter Ervine PUP Naomi Rachel Long Alliance Michael Stewart Copeland UUP Belfast North: Nigel Alexander Dodds DUP Gerry Kelly Sinn Fein Nelson McCausland DUP Fred Cobain UUP Alban Maginness SDLP Kathy Stanton Sinn Fein Belfast South: Michael McGimpsey UUP Simon Mark Peter Robinson DUP John Esmond Birnie UUP Carmel Hanna SDLP Alex Maskey Sinn Fein Alasdair McDonnell SDLP Belfast West: Gerry Adams Sinn Fein Alex Atwood SDLP Bairbre de Brún Sinn Fein Fra McCann Sinn Fein Michael Ferguson Sinn Fein Diane Dodds DUP East Antrim: Roy Beggs UUP Sammy Wilson DUP Ken Robinson UUP Sean Neeson Alliance David William Hilditch DUP Thomas George Dawson DUP East Londonderry: Gregory Campbell DUP David McClarty UUP Francis Brolly Sinn Fein George Robinson DUP Norman Hillis UUP John Dallat SDLP Fermanagh and South Tyrone: Thomas Beatty (Tom) Elliott UUP Arlene Isobel Foster DUP* Tommy Gallagher SDLP Michelle Gildernew Sinn Fein Maurice Morrow DUP Hugh Thomas O’Reilly Sinn Fein * Elected as UUP candidate, became a member of the DUP with effect from 15 January 2004 Foyle: John Mark Durkan SDLP William Hay DUP Mitchel McLaughlin Sinn Fein Mary Bradley SDLP Pat Ramsey SDLP Mary Nelis Sinn Fein Lagan Valley: Jeffrey Mark Donaldson DUP* Edwin Cecil Poots DUP Billy Bell UUP Seamus Anthony Close Alliance Patricia Lewsley SDLP Norah Jeanette Beare DUP* * Elected as UUP candidate, became a member of the DUP with effect from
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 1002 Wednesday, No. 3 9 December 2020 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Mental Health Policy: Motion [Private Members] � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 277 N00100Ceisteanna ó Cheannairí - Leaders’ Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 306 09/12/2020R00200Ceisteanna ar Reachtaíocht a Gealladh - Questions on Promised Legislation � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 315 09/12/2020U00550Estimates for Public Services 2020 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 324 09/12/2020U00900Restoration of Private Members’ Bills to the Order Paper: Motion � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 325 09/12/2020U01150Ceisteanna - Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 325 09/12/2020U01175Ministerial Advisers � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 325 09/12/2020V02650Cabinet Committees � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 329 09/12/2020X03350Covid-19 Pandemic � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 336 Ábhair Shaincheisteanna Tráthúla - Topical Issue
    [Show full text]
  • Strangford Lough Management Committee Fourth Report 2001-2004
    STRANGFORD LOUGH MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE FOURTH REPORT 2001-2004 CONTENTS 01 Chairman’s Introduction 11 Integrated Coastal Management In 03 Membership And Representation Northern Ireland 03 How The Committee And Its Working 12 Planning Applications Groups Operate 13 Water Quality 04 Strangford Lough SAC / SPA Management Scheme 14 Tidal Energy 04 Environment And Heritage Service Review 15 Aids To Navigation Of SLMC 15 Dealing With Emergency Pollution 05 Environmental Monitoring Incidents 07 Temporary Ban On Mobile Gear Fishing 16 Regulation Of Activities 08 Shellfish Poisoning - Algal Toxins 17 Strangford Lough Information Network 08 Sustainable Shellfish Farming 18 Events And Workshops 09 Collecting Shellfish On The Shore 19 Consultation Documents Commented Upon 2001 - 2004 10 Seals 20 SLMC Terms Of Reference 10 Phocine Distemper 21 Appendix A - Supplementary Information 11 Ards And Down Area Plan Update On Horse Mussel Communities ACRONYMS USED ABC - Ards Borough Council ASSI - Area of Special Scientific Interest CIL - Commissioners of Irish Lights DARD - Department of Agriculture and Rural * All photography is reproduced with kind permission Development of Ards Borough Council, Environment and Heritage DDC - Down District Council Service, Strangford Lough Management Committee, DRD - Department for Regional The National Trust, PJS Boaden, RA Brown, M Development Hartwell, C Nolan, Centre for Maritime Research, g2 DOE - Department of the Environment and the Northern Ireland Tourist Board. EHS - Environment and Heritage Service EU - European Union LLA - Local Lighthouse Authority MCA - Maritime & Coastguard Agency SAC - Special Area of Conservation SLMC - Strangford Lough Management Committee (former name for what is now the Strangford Lough Management Advisory Committee) SPA - Special Protection Area SLECI - Strangford Lough Ecological Change Investigation 01 CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION Previous Committees have contributed significantly to the design phase of this Management Scheme, and the EHS officially launched the Scheme in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • DUP Discourses on Violence and Their Impact on the Northern Ireland Peace Process
    Peace and Conflict Studies Volume 15 Number 1 Political Discourse as an Instrument of Conflict and eace:P Lessons from Northern Article 7 Ireland 8-2008 DUP Discourses on Violence and their Impact on the Northern Ireland Peace Process Amber Rankin University of St. Andrews, [email protected] Gladys Ganiel Trinity College Dublin, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs Part of the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Rankin, Amber and Ganiel, Gladys (2008) "DUP Discourses on Violence and their Impact on the Northern Ireland Peace Process," Peace and Conflict Studies: Vol. 15 : No. 1 , Article 7. DOI: 10.46743/1082-7307/2008.1091 Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol15/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Peace & Conflict Studies at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Peace and Conflict Studies by an authorized editor of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DUP Discourses on Violence and their Impact on the Northern Ireland Peace Process Abstract This paper analyses the Democratic Unionist Party‟s (DUP) discourses about paramilitary violence in Northern Ireland. Drawing on narrative analysis of DUP discourses reported in Northern Ireland‟s largest unionist newspaper, the News Letter (1998–2006), it explores the relationship between the party‟s identity, its discourses about republican and loyalist paramilitaries, and the impact of these words on the DUP‟s electoral success and on the peace process. The paper argues that these discourses may haunt the progress of peace-building, not least because the DUP will find it hard to disentangle itself from a history of scepticism and nay-saying even as it takes a leading role in a devolved Executive designed by an Agreement it long-scorned.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard)
    OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard) Vol u m e 2 (15 February 1999 to 15 July 1999) BELFAST: THE STATIONERY OFFICE LTD £70.00 © Copyright The New Northern Ireland Assembly. Produced and published in Northern Ireland on behalf of the Northern Ireland Assembly by the The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Northern Ireland Assembly publications. ISBN 0 339 80001 1 ASSEMBLY MEMBERS (A = Alliance Party; NIUP = Northern Ireland Unionist Party; NIWC = Northern Ireland Women’s Coalition; PUP = Progressive Unionist Party; SDLP = Social Democratic and Labour Party; SF = Sinn Fein; DUP = Ulster Democratic Unionist Party; UKUP = United Kingdom Unionist Party; UUP = Ulster Unionist Party; UUAP = United Unionist Assembly Party) Adams, Gerry (SF) (West Belfast) Kennedy, Danny (UUP) (Newry and Armagh) Adamson, Ian (UUP) (East Belfast) Leslie, James (UUP) (North Antrim) Agnew, Fraser (UUAP) (North Belfast) Lewsley, Patricia (SDLP) (Lagan Valley) Alderdice of Knock, The Lord (Initial Presiding Officer) Maginness, Alban (SDLP) (North Belfast) Armitage, Pauline (UUP) (East Londonderry) Mallon, Seamus (SDLP) (Newry and Armagh) Armstrong, Billy (UUP) (Mid Ulster) Maskey, Alex (SF) (West Belfast) Attwood, Alex (SDLP) (West Belfast) McCarthy, Kieran (A) (Strangford) Beggs, Roy (UUP) (East Antrim) McCartney, Robert (UKUP) (North Down) Bell, Billy (UUP) (Lagan Valley) McClarty, David (UUP) (East Londonderry) Bell, Eileen (A) (North Down) McCrea, Rev William (DUP) (Mid Ulster) Benson, Tom (UUP) (Strangford) McClelland, Donovan (SDLP) (South
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2001
    annual report 2001 NIA 9/02 CONTENTS 1. Introduction by Joint Secretaries 3 2. Chapter 1 - Background to North/South Ministerial Council 5 3. Chapter 2 - The Operation of the North/South Ministerial Council 9 4. Chapter 3 - NSMC Plenary Meeting 13 5. Chapter 4 - NSMC Institutional Meeting 17 6. Chapter 5 - NSMC Sectoral Meetings 21 7. Chapter 6 - The Joint Secretariat 43 8. Annex 1 - Attendance at Plenary Meeting 47 9. Annex 2 - Attendance at Institutional Meeting 49 10. Annex 3 - Attendance at Sectoral Meetings 51 11. Annex 4 - Financial Information 57 12. Annex 5 - Joint Secretariat Organisation Chart 59 13. Annex 6 - North/South Bodies Contact Details 61 14. Annex 7 - North/South Bodies Board Members 65 15. Annex 8 - Departmental Information 69 2 INTRODUCTION BY JOINT SECRETARIES 3 INTRODUCTION We are very pleased to present the were, therefore, increasingly in a second Annual Report of the position to undertake their full North/South Ministerial Council (NSMC). programmes of work. Sound progress This covers the NSMC’s activities for the can now be reported in all areas coming year 2001. Established under the terms within the mandate of the Council. of the Belfast Agreement of Good Friday 1998, the NSMC brings together We should like to place on record our representatives of the Northern Ireland thanks to all Ministers from both Executive and the Irish Government to jurisdictions and their officials for their develop consultation, co-operation and strong support for the Secretariat and action within the island of Ireland on their unfailing courtesy in their dealings matters of mutual interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Rights, Safeguards, Equality Issues and Victims
    Session 2006/2007 Report on Rights, Safeguards, Equality Issues and Victims TOGETHER WITH THE MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS, OFFICIAL REPORT AND PAPERS SUBMITTED BY PARTIES TO THE COMMITTEE ON THE PREPARATION FOR GOVERNMENT Directed by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland to be printed 19 September 2006 £29.00 Committee on the Preparation for Government Under the terms of the Northern Ireland Act 2006 the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, the Rt. Hon Peter Hain MP, directed on 26 May 2006 that a Committee should be established on the necessary business relating to the preparation for government. On 12 June 2006, the Secretary of State directed that the Committee should be chaired by the deputy presiding officers, Mr Jim Wells and Mr Francie Molloy. Membership The Committee has 14 members with a quorum of seven. The membership of the Committee since its establishment on 26 May 2006 is as follows: Mark Durkan MP Dr Sean Farren David Ford Michelle Gildernew MP Danny Kennedy Naomi Long Dr William McCrea MP Dr Alasdair McDonnell MP Alan McFarland Martin McGuinness MP *David McNarry Lord Morrow Conor Murphy MP Ian Paisley Jnr * Mr McNarry replaced Mr Michael McGimpsey on 10 July 2006. At its meeting on 12 June 2006, the Committee agreed that deputies could attend if members of the Committee were unable to do so. The following members attended at various times: Billy Armstrong George Ennis Alban Maginness Alex Attwood Michael Ferguson Alex Maskey Esmond Birnie Arlene Foster Sean Neeson Dominic Bradley William Hay Dermot Nesbitt PJ Bradley
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution Monitoring Programme 2006-08
    DEVOLUTION MONITORING PROGRAMME 2006-08 Northern Ireland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 Professor Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson Queen’s University Belfast (eds.) ISSN 1751-3871 The Devolution Monitoring Programme From 1999 to 2005 the Constitution Unit at University College London managed a major research project monitoring devolution across the UK through a network of research teams. 103 reports were produced during this project, which was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number L 219 252 016) and the Leverhulme Nations and Regions Programme. Now, with further funding from the Economic and social research council and support from several government departments, the monitoring programme is continuing for a further three years from 2006 until the end of 2008. Three times per year, the research network produces detailed reports covering developments in devolution in five areas: Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Englsh Regions, and Devolution and the Centre. The overall monitoring project is managed by Professor Robert Hazell and Akash Paun at the Constitution Unit, UCL and the team leaders are as follows: Scotland: Peter Jones Honorary Senior Research Fellow, The Constitution Unit, UCL Former political correspondent for The Economist Wales: Dr Richard Wyn Jones & Dr Roger Scully Institute of Welsh Politics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth Northern Ireland: Professor Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson Queen’s University, Belfast English Regions: Martin Burch & James Rees, IPEG, University of Manchester Alan Harding, SURF, University of Salford The Centre: Professor Robert Hazell, The Constitution Unit, UCL Akash Paun, The Constitution Unit, UCL The Constitution Unit and the rest of the research network is grateful to all the funders of the devolution monitoring programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulster Unionist Dimension in the Usa 2004
    ULSTER UNIONIST DIMENSION IN THE USA Prioritising Neutrality or Leverage, Third Party mediation with a reluctant actor: The U.S. government and Ulster Unionists as a case study By Elodie Aviotte PhD 2004 ULSTER UNIONIST DIMENSION IN THE USA Prioritising Neutrality or Leverage, Third Party mediation with a reluctant actor: The U.S. government and Ulster Unionists as a case study By Elodie Aviotte, DEUG, Licence, Maîtrise For the Degree of PhD Dublin City University School of Law and Government Supervisor: Dr. John Doyle October 2004 I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of a Ph.D. is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In memory of Alain Janey, my grand-father, without whom, all of this would never have been possible. To my family and friends who constantly supported me. This thesis is theirs as without them, the road to achievement would have been considerably more difficult. I would like to thank Dr. John Doyle, my Ph.D. supervisor, for his guidance and hard work during all those years. I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to Prof. David E. Schmitt for showing me the way when I did not know which direction to take. 1 am very grateful to all the people who helped me, all the interviewees and those who contributed to make this thesis feasible by providing crucial material or the right context at the right time.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifesto Ulster Unionist Party the Ulster Unionist Party Will DELIVER
    Manifesto Ulster Unionist Party The Ulster Unionist Party will DELIVER. We are delivering on all the important issues for you and will continue to do so on: • the maintenance of the Union • peace and democracy • greater prosperity • improved quality of life • better services • good education • better health services. • We will protect your rights and the rights of children now and in the future. page one Rt Hon David Trimble with David Burnside Jeffrey Donaldson with Rt Hon John D Taylor Election 2001 We are advocates for the Union. Key priorities for the next Parliament Unionism is not based on any sense of must be: elitism or particular religious belief. It is • to enhance the role of Ulster Unionism based on a sense of Britishness - a shared at the heart of British political life bond and a shared history with the rest of the United Kingdom. It is inclusive: all • to deliver strengthened local democratic the peoples of the British Isles and all accountability through a more effective Northern Ireland Assembly sections of the community in Northern Ireland have contributed to, and • to deliver a culture of lawfulness participated in, that history. throughout Northern Ireland The Union offers all the people of • to deliver a stronger Northern Ireland economy and greater prosperity Northern Ireland the best prospect of peace and fair play because it unites us all into a • to deliver a better quality of social, genuinely plural, liberal, democratic state, cultural and environmental life capable of accomodating social, cultural and religious diversity, and offering • to deliver better technical and vocational education while maintaining high opportunity to all.
    [Show full text]
  • URBAN PLANNING and CULTURAL IDENTITY the RTPI Library Series
    URBAN PLANNING AND CULTURAL IDENTITY The RTPI Library Series Editors: Cliff Hague, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland Tim Richardson, Sheffield University, UK Robert Upton, RTPI, London, UK Published in conjunction with The Royal Town Planning Institute, this series of leading-edge texts looks at all aspects of spatial planning theory and practice from a comparative and international perspective. Planning in Postmodern Times Philip Allmendinger, University of Aberdeen, Scotland The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective No Masterplan Andreas Faludi and Bas Waterhout, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands Planning for Crime Prevention Richard Schneider, University of Florida, USA, and Ted Kitchen, Sheffield Hallam University, UK The Planning Polity Mark Tewdwr-Jones, The Bartlett, University College London Shadows of Power An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning Jean Hillier, Curtin University of Technology, Australia Urban Planning and Cultural Identity William J.V. Neill, Queen’s University, Belfast Forthcoming: Place Identity, Participation and Planning Edited by Cliff Hague and Paul Jenkins Public Values and Private Interests Heather Campbell and Robert Marshall Indicators for Urban and Regional Planning Cecilia Wong URBAN PLANNING AND CULTURAL IDENTITY WILLIAM J.V. NEILL First published 2004 by Routledge, 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge, 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor and Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. © 2004 William J.V. Neill All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BELFAST AGREEMENT a Practical Legal Analysis
    THE BELFAST AGREEMENT A practical legal analysis Austen Morgan BSc MA in Law PhD of Lincoln’s Inn, Barrister and Member of the Inn of Court of Northern Ireland THE BELFAST PRESS London 2000 First published in Great Britain 2000 by The Belfast Press Limited 29 Ludgate Hill, London EC4M 7JE Copyright © Austen Morgan 2000 The Belfast Agreement CM 3883 Crown Copyright © 1998 The right of Austen Morgan to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0-9539287-0-5 Designed and produced for The Belfast Press by Chase Publishing Services Printed in the European Union by Antony Rowe, Chippenham, England CONTENTS v Contents Prologue x Preface xiii Acknowledgements xxiii Table of Cases xxiv Table of Statutes and Other Domestic Legislation xxviii Table of Treaties and Other Documents xxxvii Abbreviations xlv Part 1 INTRODUCTION 1. What is the Belfast Agreement? 3 The extant texts 3 The relationship between politics and law 6 The relationship between the Multi-Party Agreement and the British-Irish Agreement of 10 April 1998 7 The giving effect to the Belfast Agreement in United Kingdom and Irish law 10 2. Public international law 15 The plane of international law 15 States and governments 17 Territorial sovereignty 18 Human rights and self-determination 19 The law of treaties 23 The pacific settlement of international disputes 25 The relationship between international and municipal law in the United Kingdom and Irish states 27 3.
    [Show full text]