DOCSLIB.ORG

Sacep Unep Norad

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sacep Unep Norad SACEP UNEP NORAD SACEP / UNEP / NORAD Publication Series on Environmental Law and Policy No.4 SACEP /UNEP / NORAD REPORT OF THE REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN PROMOTING THE RULE OF LAW IN THE AREA OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Colombo, Sri Lanka 4-6 July, 1997 Published by: South Asia Co-operative Environment Programme (SACEP) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) with fmancial supporl. from The Norwegian Agency for Development Co-operation (NORAD) SACEP UNEP NORAD SACEP / UNEP / NORAD Publication Series on Environmental Law and Policy No.4 SACEP IUNEP I NORAD REPORT OF THE REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN PROMOTING THE RULE OF LAW IN THE AREA OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Colombo, Sri Lanka 4-6 July, 1997 Editors Donald Kaniaru Director, Environmental Law and Institutions Centre, UNEP Lal Kurukulasuriya Chief, Regional Environmental Law Programme, UNEPIROAP Prasantha Dias Abeyegunawardene Deputy Director, Programmes, SACEP Chad Martino Legal Officer, UNEPIROAP Table of Contents Introduction........................................................ ............... ............... .......... III List of Participants............. .............. ..... .... .............................. ...... ................ vii Agenda.................................... ............................. ...................................... xiii I. INAUGURATION Address by Mr. Hussain Shihab, Director, SACEP................................... 1 Address by Hon. Nandimitra Ekanayake - Minister ofForestry & Environment, Sri Lanka................................................... ............... 5 Address by H. E. Ove Christian Danbolt - Head of Mission ofThe Royal Norwegian Embassy............................................................................ 9 Address by Mr. Donald Kaniaru Director, Environmental Law CentrelUNEP, on Behalfof Ms. Elizabeth Dowdeswell, Under Secretary General ofthe United Nations and Executive Director ofUNEP.................. 11 Address by Hon. G. L. Peiris, Minister ofJustice, Constitutional Affairs, Ethnic Affairs & National Integration, Sri Lanka............................................ 13 Inaugural Address by Chief Guest, Hon. K. B. Ratnayake Speaker of The House ofParliament, Sri Lanka.................................................. 21 Keynote Address by H. E. Judge Christopher G. Weeramantry Vice-President ofThe International Court of Justice.............................................. ..... 25 Vote of Thanks by Mr. Prasantha Dias Abeyegunawardene, Deputy DirectorlProgrammes, SACEP........................................................ 39 II. OPENING SESSION "The Role of Law in Making Development More Sustainable" ­ Professor Mohan Munasinghe.................................................... 47 Country Presentations Bangladesh -Hon. Mr. Justice A. T. M Afzal................................................ 61 India - Hon. Mr. Justice B. N Kirpal............................................................ 73 Maldives - Hon. Mr. Abdul/aM Majid............................................................. 79 Nepal - Holl. Mr. Justice Trilok Pratap Rana................................................. 87 Pakistan - Hon. Mr. Justice Raja Afrasiab ................................................... 99 Sri Lanka - Hon. Mr. Justice Mark Fernando ................................................ 105 III. NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE PREVENTION AND RESOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTES "The Experience ofa Specialist Environmental Court" - Hon. Mr. Justice Paul Stein ............................... ......................... 143 "New Directions: The Prevention and Resolution ofEnvironmental Disputes" - Hon. Mr. Justice B. N Kirpal........................................................ 161 "The Environmental Appeal Tribunal ofMauritius" - Hon. Mme. D. Beesoondoya/.. ........................ ........................... 171 "Principles ofEnvironmental Justice: A Foundation for Dispute Prevention and Resolution" . Professor Nicholas A. Robinson......................... ..................... 181 IV. CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENTS IN INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL LAW IN THE FIELD OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT "The Challenge for the Judiciary in the Application ofGeneral Principles of Environmental Law" - Mr. Donald Kaniaru........... ...................................................... 197 "Contemporary Developments in National Laws in the Area ofSustainable Development with Special Reference to Asia" - Hon. Sarath Silva..... .................................................... 215 V. CLOSING SESSION Closing Remarks - Hon Mr. Justice A. R B. Amerasinghe............................. 223 Closing Address - H.E. Judge Christopher G. Weeramantry......................... 229 ii Introduction INTRODUCTION The Regional Symposium on the Role of the Judiciary in Promoting the Rule of Law in the Area of Sustainable Development was convened jointly by the South Asia Co-operative Environment Programme (SACEP) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) with funding from the Royal Norwegian Government through NORAD, and was held in Colombo, Sri Lanka from 4-6 July, 1997. This important initiative was undertaken by the two organisations under the on-going Joint SACEPIUNEPINORAD Project on Environmental Law in South Asia. The Symposium brought together superior court judges from countries in South Asia to examine contemporary developments in the field of environmental law ­ both international and national - exchange views on experiences in their respective jurisdictions relating to the progressive development of this new and rapidly growing branch of law, and to fmd ways and means of strengthening judicial co-operation in the region. The Vice-President of the International Court of Justice, H.E. Judge Christopher G. Weeramantry served as the Moderator of the Symposium while Hon. Mr. Justice Ranjith Amerasinghe, Judge ofthe Supreme Court of Sri Lanka served as its Secretary General. Hon. Mr. Justice P.N. Bhagwati, the former Chief Justice of India, who served as the Advisor to UNEP and SACEP in the organisation of the Symposium, was unfortunately unable to attend as he was taken ill on the eve ofthe Symposium. Among those who presented papers at the Symposium were: the Chief Justice of Bangladesh, Hon. Mr. Justice A.T.M.Afzal; the Chief Justice of Nepal Hon. Mr. Justice Trilok Pratap Rana; Hon. Justice B. N. Kirpal, Judge of the Supreme Court of India; Hon. Mr. Justice Raja Afrasiab Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan; Hon. Mr. Justice Mark Fernando, Judge of the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka; Hon. Sarath N. Silva, Attorney General of Sri Lanka; Hon. Abdullahi Majeed, Deputy Minister ofPlanning, Human Resources and Environment ofthe Maldives; Hon. Mr. Justice Paul Stein, Judge of the Court of Appeal, New South Wales, Australia and former Judge of the Land and Environmental Court of NSW; Hon. Mme. D. Beesoondoyal, Chair, Environmental Appeal Tribunal of Mauritius; Mr. Donald Kaniaru, Director ofUNEP's Environmental Law Centre with his colleague Professor Charles· Okidi; Professor Nicholas A. Robinson, Chair, mCN Commission on Environmental Law; and Prof. Mohan Munasinghe, Senior Adviser on Sustainable Development at the World Bank. The Symposium recommended a series of actions referred to below, designed to facilitate and encourage :the judiciaries in the region to take cognisance of the growing body of judicial decisions and formulations - both within and outside Introduction the region- on environment related issues, especially in regard to balancing environmental and developmental considerations in judicial decision making. UNEP and SACEP with financial assistance from NORAD are currently implementing these recommendations under the Joint SACEPIUNEPINORAD Project on Environmental Law in South Asia. Following the ceremonial inauguration, the heads of country delegations presented country papers which outlined the current status of legal and institutional arrangements for environmental management and for integrating environmental considerations in executive decision making, and also discussed the reasoning behind important judicial decisions in the area of environment and development in their respective jurisdictions. This was followed by a detailed consideration of two themes: New directions in the prevention and resolution of environmental disputes, and, Contemporary developments in international and national environmental law. The following are among the important legal issues that were discussed at the Symposium against the backdrop ofjudgements of superior courts of the region in recent environment related cases: Incorporation of the principle of sustainable development, the polluter pays principle, the precautionary principle, and the principle of continuous mandamus in the corpus of international and national law; invocation of the extraordinary jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in environmental matters; public participation, including substantive and procedural matters relating to public interest litigation; the erga omnes character of environmental matters and the problem of applying inter partes procedures in environmental dispute resolution; limits of the concepts of "aggrieved person" and "locus standi" in regard to environmental damage; inter-generational and intra-generational equity; court commissions to ascertain facts and an authoritative assessment of the scientific and technical aspects of environment and development issues; interpretation of constitutional rights including right to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SASANASIRITISSA THERO and OTHERS V. P.A. DE SILVA, CHIEF INSPECTOR, C.I.D
    356 Sri Lanka Law Reports (1989) 2 Sri LR SASANASIRITISSA THERO AND OTHERS v. P.A. DE SILVA, CHIEF INSPECTOR, C.I.D. AND OTHERS SUPREME COURT H.A.G DE SILVA, J „ BANDARANAYAKE,. J. AND KULATUNGA, J. S.C. APPLICATIONS 13/88, 14/88 and 15/88 MAY 17, 18, 19, 29 & 30, 1989 Fundamental Rights - Mala tide arrest and detention tor political reasons - Articles 12(1), 12(2), 13(1), 13(2) and 14(1) of the Constitution - Time-base At the Katana Mahapola celebration held at Harischandra Vidyalaya a bomb explosion took place to disrupt the procession and two hand grenades were thrown - one of which struck a student and rolled on to the ground without exploding a few yards from the Hon. Amarasiri, Minister of Trade and Hon. Wijayapala Mendis, Minister of Textile Industries (5th respondent) and the others exploded causing injuries to the 6th respondent (the 5th respondent's Public Relations Officer). The 1st petitioner is the patron of the SLFP and a prominent party worker opposed to the Government while the 2nd. and 3rd petitioners were his van driver and aide respectively. The 1st petitioner’s van driven by the 2nd petitioner had been about 75 yards away from the place where the bomb exploded. The van had come to the town to change tyres and neither the 2nd or 3rd' petitioner's had anything to do with the incident. The 1 st petitioner had gone, to the house of one Justin Silva and with him gone to the temple but came to know on the day of the incident itself (9.10.87) that his driver and aide • had been taken into custody.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration and Morality Amongst Sri Lankan Catholics
    UNLIKELY COSMPOLITANS: MIGRATION AND MORALITY AMONGST SRI LANKAN CATHOLICS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Bernardo Enrique Brown August, 2013 © 2013 Bernardo Enrique Brown ii UNLIKELY COSMOPOLITANS: MIGRATION AND MORALITY AMONGST SRI LANKAN CATHOLICS Bernardo Enrique Brown, Ph.D. Cornell University, 2013 Sri Lankan Catholic families that successfully migrated to Italy encountered multiple challenges upon their return. Although most of these families set off pursuing very specific material objectives through transnational migration, the difficulties generated by return migration forced them to devise new and creative arguments to justify their continued stay away from home. This ethnography traces the migratory trajectories of Catholic families from the area of Negombo and suggests that – due to particular religious, historic and geographic circumstances– the community was able to develop a cosmopolitan attitude towards the foreign that allowed many of its members to imagine themselves as ―better fit‖ for migration than other Sri Lankans. But this cosmopolitanism was not boundless, it was circumscribed by specific ethical values that were constitutive of the identity of this community. For all the cosmopolitan curiosity that inspired people to leave, there was a clear limit to what values and practices could be negotiated without incurring serious moral transgressions. My dissertation traces the way in which these iii transnational families took decisions, constantly navigating between the extremes of a flexible, rootless cosmopolitanism and a rigid definition of identity demarcated by local attachments. Through fieldwork conducted between January and December of 2010 in the predominantly Catholic region of Negombo, I examine the work that transnational migrants did to become moral beings in a time of globalization, individualism and intense consumerism.
    [Show full text]
  • In Memoriam, HE Professor Dr. Christopher Gregory Weeramantry1
    Revista Tribuna Internacional Volumen 6 • Nº 12 • 2017 ISSN 0719-482X (versión en línea) In Memoriam, HE Professor Dr. Christopher Gregory Weeramantry1 Sergio Peña Neira [email protected] Profesor Asociado de Derecho internacional público y Filosofía del Derecho en la Universidad Bernardo O´Higgins, Doctor por la Universidad Internacional de Andalucía. El día 5 de enero de 2017 ha fallecido en Colombo, Sri Lanka, uno de los juristas más relevantes para el Derecho internacional público y particularmente para el Derecho internacional del Desarrollo, el profesor Cristopher G. Weeramantry. Nacido el 17 de noviembre de 1926 en Colombo, Ceylán gran parte de su trabajo lo efectuó allí, en Australia y en La Haya (Holanda). El Centro de Estudios de Derecho Internacional Sustentable (en sus siglas en inglés CISDL) ha expresado que el juez Weeramantry, como se le conoció universalmente, fue uno de sus miembros más ilustres. Desarrolló, sin duda, un trabajo extraordinariamente fecundo en cuanto a sus ideas desde su trabajo como juez. Un jurista de gran bondad y autoexigencia. Fue uno de sus fundadores y patrón del mismo por 16 años.2 Sus estudios los realizó en Sri Lanka, Universidad de Ceylan, su país natal, en aquel tiempo el Royal College, Colombo para luego dedicar su tiempo y esfuerzo en una licenciatura en Derecho y doctorado en el King´s College London, una universidad de fama mundial, hoy parte de la Universidad de Londres. Esta universidad, sin duda, es la más importante universidad formadora de juristas en derecho internacional, transnacional, filosofía jurídica y derecho tributario del mundo. Sus estudios en Sri Lanka fueron excelsos en cuanto obtuvo premios de diversa índole.3 Sus primero pasos se encaminaron a la Historia para luego, bajo la influencia de su hermano Lucien Weeramantry, dedicarse al Derecho.4 1 Artículo enviado el 13.07.2017 y aceptado el 19.07.2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Update UNHCR/CDR Background Paper on Sri Lanka
    NATIONS UNIES UNITED NATIONS HAUT COMMISSARIAT HIGH COMMISSIONER POUR LES REFUGIES FOR REFUGEES BACKGROUND PAPER ON REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS FROM Sri Lanka UNHCR CENTRE FOR DOCUMENTATION AND RESEARCH GENEVA, JUNE 2001 THIS INFORMATION PAPER WAS PREPARED IN THE COUNTRY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS UNIT OF UNHCR’S CENTRE FOR DOCUMENTATION AND RESEARCH ON THE BASIS OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION, ANALYSIS AND COMMENT, IN COLLABORATION WITH THE UNHCR STATISTICAL UNIT. ALL SOURCES ARE CITED. THIS PAPER IS NOT, AND DOES NOT, PURPORT TO BE, FULLY EXHAUSTIVE WITH REGARD TO CONDITIONS IN THE COUNTRY SURVEYED, OR CONCLUSIVE AS TO THE MERITS OF ANY PARTICULAR CLAIM TO REFUGEE STATUS OR ASYLUM. ISSN 1020-8410 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................. 3 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 4 2 MAJOR POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN SRI LANKA SINCE MARCH 1999................ 7 3 LEGAL CONTEXT...................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 International Legal Context ................................................................................................. 17 3.2 National Legal Context........................................................................................................ 19 4 REVIEW OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sirimavo Bandaranaike Ranasinghe Premadasa And
    sc Sirimavo Bandaranaike v. Ranasinghe Premadasa and Another 1 SIRIMAVO BANDARANAIKE v. RANASINGHE PREMADASA AND CHANDANANDA DE SILVA SUPREME COURT G. P. S. DE SILVA, C.J. P. RAMANATHAN, J. S. B. GOONEWARDENE, J. P. R. P. PERERA, J. AND A. S. WIJETUNGA, J. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION NO. 1 OF 1989 19 JUNE 1989 TO 30 JUNE 1992 Presidential Election Petition - General intimidation - Non-compliance with provisions o f the Presidential Elections Act No. 15 of 1981 - Failure to conduct a free and fair election in accordance with the provisions of the Presidential Elections Act - Presidential Elections Act No. 15 of 1981 ss. 91 (a), 91 (b) - Interpretation ofs. 91 (a) - Burden o f pro of-ss. 101, 102 Evidence Ordinance. The election to the office of President of Sri Lanka was held on 19 December 1988. There were three candidates namely Sirimavo R. D. Bandaranaike (Petitioner) of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP), Ranasinghe Premadasa (1st respondent) of the United National Party (UNP) and Oswin Abeygunasekera of the Sri Lanka Mahajana Party (SLMP). The petitioner received 2289860 or 44.95% of the votes, the 1st respondent 2569199 or 50.43% of the votes and Abeygunasekera 235719 or 4.63% of the votes. The first respondent won by a Majority of 279339 votes. Of the eligible voters 55.32% voted. The 2nd respondent as Commissioner of Elections declared the 1st respondent elected to the office of President of Sri Lanka. The petitioner by petition filed on 09 January 1989 challenged the election of the 1st respondent on the following grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • BEYOND NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION Number 02
    BEYOND NUCLEAR NON- PROLIFERATION A Monthly Newsletter for Strengthening This page includes independent news NUMBER 02 coverage which is part of a project Awareness of Nuclear Abolition supported by Soka Gakkai International. IPS, the global news agency, brings you independent news and views on nuclear abolition. In this newsletter you will find in-depth reports by IPS correspondents and project partners from around the world as well as columns by experts, in addition to special sections for news from international NGOs and a review of the global media for a glimpse of what is happening on the ground. Join us in helping strengthen awareness about the abolition of nuclear weapons – and encourage your friends and colleagues to subscribe to this free monthly newsletter. Groups Seek World Court Opinion on Nukes By Thalif Deen UNITED NATIONS - A coalition of international non-governmental organisations (NGOs) is seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) - the second in 13 years - on the legality and use of nuclear weapons. Christopher Weeramantry, a former ICJ judge and president of the International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms (IALANA), says more than a decade has passed since the Court unanimously declared that nuclear weapons have the "potential to destroy all civilisation and the entire ecosystem of the planet." MORE >> Mayors Gather at U.N. to Lobby Against Nukes By Matthew Berger UNITED NATIONS - The issue of nuclear disarmament being discussed with new vigour in the halls of the U.N. as the third and final preparatory committee leading up to the 2010 review conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) meets over the next two weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Post of Vice-Chancellor, University of Jaffna Professor V.Tharmaratnam, Age 80
    The Post of Vice-chancellor, University of Jaffna Professor V.Tharmaratnam, age 80; former Professor of Mathematics at the University of Colombo and later at the University of Jaffna, and is presently a member of the Council, University of Jaffna. Professor Tharmaratnam had ‘Appeared in Person’ in the Supreme Court Case SC Appeal 87/09 and in that case the Supreme Court gave him an opportunity to make oral and/or written submissions on 2nd September, 30th September and 18th November, 2010 against the FIVE BENCH judgment in SC Appeal 101- A/2009 of S.Rajendra Chettiar and others v Sitranjan Chettiar and others, which was decided on 10th June, 2010. He expressed his opinion at the Council meeting held on 25th February, 2017 that Professor Thiagalingam’s application should be accepted and voted at the elections held on 26th February, 2017 after stating that he is participating in the elections without prejudice to his rights to pursue his legal opinion. Professor Tharmaratnam’s written opinion based on his presentation to the Council on 25th February 2017 is given below. Legal Opinion: The Post of Vice-Chancellor, University of Jaffna was advertised on the 25th of November 2016, with 3 p.m., on 16th January 2017 as the closing time. Applications were invited by Hand or by Registered Post and there was a note that applications received after the closing time will not be considered. Professor Sam Thiagalingam from Boston University, U.S.A. had posted his application on the 27th of December, 2016 and the application was received at the University of Jaffna on the 18th of January, 2017 As the University of Jaffna had specified Registered Post as a medium of transmission for applications the following questions arise… i.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the WORLD COURT PROJECT: HISTORY and CONSEQUENCES
    THE WORLD COURT PROJECT: HISTORY and CONSEQUENCES by Kate Dewes and Robert Green Published in Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, Volume 7, Number 1, Fall 1999 The forces ranged against the view of illegality are truly colossal. However collisions with the colossal have not deterred the law on its upward course towards the concept of the rule of law. It has not flinched from the task of imposing constraints upon physical power when legal principle so demands. It has been by a determined stand against forces that seemed colossal or irresistible that the rule of law has been won. Judge Christopher Weeramantry, Dissenting Opinion, 1996. INTRODUCTION On 21 October 1999, a court case in Greenock, Scotland ended in a sensational outcome which will have major repercussions for the struggle to rid the world of nuclear weapons. Three women - Angie Zelter, Ulla Roder, and Ellen Moxley of the international Trident Ploughshares 2000 non-violent direct action campaign - were on trial before a jury for damaging some laboratory equipment used for operational support of the British Trident nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarine force. Their defence was that they had been compelled to act in order to prevent a crime of potential genocide. The judge accepted their argument that deployment of Trident is illegal, and that they were upholding the Nuremberg Charter - and she instructed the jury to acquit them. The women had based their defence on a 1996 Advisory Opinion by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), known as the World Court. The acquittal provoked an uproar in the UK, reigniting the anti-nuclear movement as the embarrassed Blair government 1 appealed against it in an attempt to have it overturned by the highest court in Scotland sometime during 2000 – but giving unprecedented publicity to this audacious challenge to the legality of Britain’s so-called “nuclear deterrent”.
    [Show full text]
  • Wickrematunge V. Republic of Sri Lanka
    Communication to the Human Rights Committee Submitted Pursuant to the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights AHIMSA WICKREMATUNGE for herself and on behalf of LASANTHA WICKREMATUNGE Victims ― v. ― DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA, Respondent INITIAL SUBMISSION Nushin Sarkarati Catherine Amirfar Carmen Cheung Natalie L. Reid CENTER FOR JUSTICE & Elizabeth Nielsen ACCOUNTABILITY Duncan Pickard One Hallidie Plaza, Suite 750 Alyssa T. Yamamoto San Francisco, CA 94102 Sebastian Dutz United States Samantha B. Singh DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP 919 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 United States 8 January 2021 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 1 A. The Authors and Victims .............................................. 1 B. Request to Prioritize the Case ....................................... 1 II. FACTS ........................................................................................ 1 A. Country Context ........................................................... 2 B. The Victims’ Story ....................................................... 6 III. THIS COMMUNICATION IS ADMISSIBLE .......................... 15 IV. SRI LANKA HAS VIOLATED THE COVENANT ................. 18 A. Right to Life (Article 6) .............................................. 18 B. Right to Freedom from Torture or Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Article 7)...... 20 C. Rights to Freedom of Expression and Opinion and Non- Discrimination
    [Show full text]
  • Transitional Justice for Women Ex-Combatants in Sri Lanka
    Transitional Justice for Women Ex-Combatants in Sri Lanka Nirekha De Silva Transitional Justice for Women Ex-Combatants in Sri Lanka Copyright© WISCOMP Foundation for Universal Responsibility Of His Holiness The Dalai Lama, New Delhi, India, 2006. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by WISCOMP Foundation for Universal Responsibility Of His Holiness The Dalai Lama Core 4A, UGF, India Habitat Centre Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003, India This initiative was made possible by a grant from the Ford Foundation. The views expressed are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect those of WISCOMP or the Foundation for Universal Responsibility of HH The Dalai Lama, nor are they endorsed by them. 2 Contents Acknowledgements 5 Preface 7 Introduction 9 Methodology 11 List of Abbreviations 13 Civil War in Sri Lanka 14 Army Women 20 LTTE Women 34 Peace and the process of Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration 45 Human Needs and Human Rights in Reintegration 55 Psychological Barriers in Reintegration 68 Social Adjustment to Civil Life 81 Available Mechanisms 87 Recommendations 96 Directory of Available Resources 100 • Counselling Centres 100 • Foreign Recruitment 102 • Local Recruitment 132 • Vocational Training 133 • Financial Resources 160 • Non-Government Organizations (NGO’s) 163 Bibliography 199 List of People Interviewed 204 3 4 Acknowledgements I am grateful to Dr. Meenakshi Gopinath and Sumona DasGupta of Women in Security, Conflict Management and Peace (WISCOMP), India, for offering the Scholar for Peace Fellowship in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Dignity in Movement Borders, Bodies and Rights
    Dignity in Movement Borders, Bodies and Rights EDITED BY JASMIN LILIAN DIAB This e-book is provided without charge via free download by E-International Relations (www.E-IR.info). It is not permitted to be sold in electronic format under any circumstances. If you enjoy our free e-books, please consider leaving a small donation to allow us to continue investing in open access publications: http://www.e-ir.info/about/donate/ i Dignity in Movement Borders, Bodies and Rights EDITED BY JASMIN LILIAN DIAB ii Dignity in Movement E-International Relations Bristol, England 2021 ISBN 978-1-910814-59-8 This book is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You are free to: • Share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. • Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material. Under the following terms: • Attribution – You must give appropriate credit to the author(s) and publisher, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. • Non-Commercial – You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission. Please contact [email protected] for any such enquiries, including for licensing and translation requests. Other than the terms noted above, there are no restrictions placed on the use and dissemination of this book for student learning materials/scholarly use. Production: Michael Tang Cover Image: Ekkapop Sittiwantana/Shutterstock A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka Assessment
    SRI LANKA COUNTRY ASSESSMENT October 2002 Country Information & Policy Unit IMMIGRATION & NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM Sri Lanka October 2002 CONTENTS 1. Scope of Document 1.1 - 1.4 2. Geography 2.1 - 2.4 3. Economy 3.1 - 3.2 4. History 4.1 - 4.79 - Independence to 1994 4.1 - 4.10 - 1994 to the present 4.11 - 4.50 - The Peace Process January 2000 - October 4.51 - 4.79 2002 5. State Structures 5.1 - 5.34 The Constitution 5.1 - 5.2 - Citizenship and Nationality 5.3 - 5.4 Political System 5.5. - 5.7 Judiciary 5.8 - 5.10 Legal Rights/Detention 5.11 - 5.21 - Death penalty 5.22 - 5.23 Internal Security 5.24 - 5.25 Prisons and Prison Conditions 5.26 Military Service 5.27 - 5.28 Medical Services 5.29 - 5.33 Educational System 5.34 6. Human Rights 6.1 - 6.168 6.A Human Rights Issues 6.1 - 6.51 Overview 6.1 - 6.4 Freedom of Speech and the Media 6.5 - 6.8 - Treatment of journalists 6.9 - 6.11 Freedom of Religion - Introduction 6.12 - Buddhists 6.13 - Hindus 6.14 - Muslims 6.15 - 6.18 - Christians 6.19 - Baha'is 6.20 Freedom of Assembly & Association 6.21 - Political Activists 6.22 - 6.26 Employment Rights 6.27 - 6.32 People Trafficking 6.33 - 6.35 Freedom of Movement 6.36 - 6.43 - Immigrants and Emigrants Act 6.44 - 6.51 6.B Human Rights - Specific Groups 6.52 - 6.151 Ethnic Groups - Tamils and general Human Rights Issues 6.52 - 6.126 - Up-country Tamils 6.127 - 6.130 - Indigenous People 6.131 Women 6.132 - 6.139 Children 6.140 - 6.145 - Child Care Arrangements 6.146 - 6.150 Homosexuals 6.151 6.C Human Rights - Other Issues
    [Show full text]