DOCSLIB.ORG

QCD Phase Diagram”, Copenhagen August 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
QCD Phase Diagram”, Copenhagen August 2001 COLOR SUPERCONDUCTIVITY Massimo Mannarelli INFN-LNGS [email protected] GGI-Firenze Sept. 2012 venerdì 21 settembre 12 “Compact Stars in the QCD Phase Diagram”, Copenhagen August 2001 venerdì 21 settembre 12 Outline • Motivations • Superconductors • Color Superconductors • Low energy degrees of freedom • Crystalline color superconductors Reviews: hep-ph/0011333, hep-ph/0202037, 0709.4635 Lecture notes by Casalbuoni http://theory.fi.infn.it/casalbuoni/barcellona.pdf venerdì 21 settembre 12 MOTIVATIONS venerdì 21 settembre 12 QCD phase diagram T Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) Tc Hadronic Color ? Superconductor (CSC) µ venerdì 21 settembre 12 QCD phase diagram T Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) Tc Hadronic Color ? Superconductor (CSC) µ venerdì 21 settembre 12 QCD phase diagram T Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) Tc Hadronic Color ? Superconductor (CSC) µ venerdì 21 settembre 12 QCD phase diagram T Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) Tc Hadronic Color ? Superconductor (CSC) µ Compact stars venerdì 21 settembre 12 QCD phase diagram T Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) Tc Hadronic Color ? Superconductor (CSC) µ Compact stars Warning: QCD is perturbative only at asymptotic energy scales venerdì 21 settembre 12 QCD phase diagram T Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) Tc Hadronic Color ? Superconductor (CSC) µ Compact stars Warning: QCD is perturbative only at asymptotic energy scales HOT MATTER ENERGY-SCAN EMULATION RHIC RHIC Ultracold fermionic EXPERIMENTS LHC NA61/SHINE@CERN-SPS atoms CBM@FAIR/GSI MPD@NICA/JINR venerdì 21 settembre 12 Compact stars quark⌧hybrid traditional neutron star star N+e N+e+n n,p,e, µ n superfluid hyperon n d u c o c t neutron star with star e r i n p g pion condensate u n, s p,e p , µ r u,d,s o quarks t o , 2SC n , CFL s , H crust Fe color−superconducting 6 3 strange quark matter K 10 g/cm (u,d,s quarks) 11 10 g/cm 3 2SC CFL 14 3 CSL CFL−K + 10 g/cm gCFL 0 CFL−K LOFF 0 Hydrogen/He CFL− atmosphere strange star nucleon star R ~ 10 km F. Weber, Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 54 (2005) 193 venerdì 21 settembre 12 Compact stars quark⌧hybrid traditional neutron star star N+e “Probes” N+e+n n,p,e, µ n superfluid cooling hyperon n d u c o c t neutron star with star e r i n glitches p g pion condensate u n, s p,e p , µ r instabilities u,d,s o quarks t o n mass-radius , 2SC , CFL s , H crust magnetic field Fe color−superconducting 6 3 strange quark matter K 10 g/cm GW (u,d,s quarks) 11 10 g/cm 3 2SC ...... CFL 14 3 CSL CFL−K + 10 g/cm gCFL 0 CFL−K LOFF 0 Hydrogen/He CFL− atmosphere strange star nucleon star R ~ 10 km F. Weber, Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 54 (2005) 193 venerdì 21 settembre 12 Compact stars quark⌧hybrid traditional neutron star star N+e “Probes” N+e+n n,p,e, µ n superfluid cooling hyperon n d u c o c t neutron star with star e r i n glitches p g pion condensate u n, s p,e p , µ r instabilities u,d,s o quarks t o n mass-radius , 2SC , CFL s , H crust magnetic field Fe color−superconducting 6 3 strange quark matter K 10 g/cm GW (u,d,s quarks) 11 10 g/cm 3 2SC ...... CFL 14 3 CSL CFL−K + 10 g/cm gCFL 0 CFL−K LOFF 0 Hydrogen/He CFL− atmosphere strange star nucleon star R ~ 10 km F. Weber, Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 54 (2005) 193 Example PSR J1614-2230 mass M ~ 2 M⊙ Demorest et al Nature 467, (2010) 1081 hard to explain with quark matter models Bombaci et al. Phys. Rev. C 85, (2012) 55807 venerdì 21 settembre 12 SUPERCONDUCTORS In 1911, H.K. Onnes, cooling mercury, found almost no resistivity at T = 4.2 K. arbitrary units -D T CV ~ e CV ~T ê R ~ T3 T 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Tc venerdì 21 settembre 12 Superconductivity is a quantum phenomenon at the macroscopic scale venerdì 21 settembre 12 Superconductivity is a quantum phenomenon at the macroscopic scale T=0 BOSONS Bosons occupy the same quantum state: They “like” to move together, no dissipation 4He becomes superfluid at T ≃ 2.17 K, Kapitsa et al (1938) BEC venerdì 21 settembre 12 Superconductivity is a quantum phenomenon at the macroscopic scale T=0 BOSONS FERMIONS Bosons occupy the same quantum Fermions cannot occupy the same state: They “like” to move together, quantum state. A different theory of no dissipation superfluidity 4He becomes superfluid at 3He becomes superfluid at T ≃ 2.17 K, Kapitsa et al (1938) T ≃ 0.0025 K, Osheroff (1971) BEC BCS venerdì 21 settembre 12 Superconductivity is a quantum phenomenon at the macroscopic scale T=0 BOSONS FERMIONS Bosons occupy the same quantum Fermions cannot occupy the same state: They “like” to move together, quantum state. A different theory of no dissipation superfluidity 4He becomes superfluid at 3He becomes superfluid at T ≃ 2.17 K, Kapitsa et al (1938) T ≃ 0.0025 K, Osheroff (1971) BEC BCS venerdì 21 settembre 12 Superconductivity is a quantum phenomenon at the macroscopic scale T=0 BOSONS FERMIONS Bosons occupy the same quantum Fermions cannot occupy the same state: They “like” to move together, quantum state. A different theory of no dissipation superfluidity 4He becomes superfluid at 3He becomes superfluid at T ≃ 2.17 K, Kapitsa et al (1938) T ≃ 0.0025 K, Osheroff (1971) BEC ? BCS venerdì 21 settembre 12 BCS Theory Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) in 1957 proposed a microscopic theory of fermionic superfluidity “active” Fermi sphere T=0 fermions PF “frozen” fermions venerdì 21 settembre 12 BCS Theory Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) in 1957 proposed a microscopic theory of fermionic superfluidity “active” Fermi sphere T=0 fermions PF “frozen” fermions Cooper pairing : Any attractive interaction produces correlated pairs of “active” fermions Cooper pairs effectively behave as bosons and condense venerdì 21 settembre 12 BCS Theory Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) in 1957 proposed a microscopic theory of fermionic superfluidity “active” Fermi sphere T=0 fermions PF “frozen” fermions Cooper pairing : Any attractive interaction produces correlated pairs of “active” fermions Cooper pairs effectively behave as bosons and condense It costs energy to break a Cooper pair E(p)= (✏(p) µ)2 +∆(p, T )2 quasiparticle dispersion law: − p venerdì 21 settembre 12 BCS Theory Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) in 1957 proposed a microscopic theory of fermionic superfluidity “active” Fermi sphere T=0 fermions PF “frozen” fermions Cooper pairing : Any attractive interaction produces correlated pairs of “active” fermions Cooper pairs effectively behave as bosons and condense It costs energy to break a Cooper pair E(p)= (✏(p) µ)2 +∆(p, T )2 quasiparticle dispersion law: − p Increasing the temperature the coherence is lost at T 0.3∆ c ' 0 venerdì 21 settembre 12 Superfluid vs Superconductors Definitions Superfluid: frictionless fluid with potential flow v = �ϕ. Irrotational: �× v = 0 Superconductor: perfect diamagnet (Meissner effect) Cooper pairing is at the basis of both phenomena (for fermions) venerdì 21 settembre 12 Superfluid vs Superconductors Definitions Superfluid: frictionless fluid with potential flow v = �ϕ. Irrotational: �× v = 0 Superconductor: perfect diamagnet (Meissner effect) Cooper pairing is at the basis of both phenomena (for fermions) Superfluid Broken global symmetry Transport of the quantum numbers Goldstone boson ϕ of the broken group with (basically) no dissipation v = �ϕ venerdì 21 settembre 12 Superfluid vs Superconductors Definitions Superfluid: frictionless fluid with potential flow v = �ϕ. Irrotational: �× v = 0 Superconductor: perfect diamagnet (Meissner effect) Cooper pairing is at the basis of both phenomena (for fermions) Superfluid Broken global symmetry Transport of the quantum numbers Goldstone boson ϕ of the broken group with (basically) no dissipation v = �ϕ Superconductor Broken gauge symmetry Broken gauge fields with mass, M, Higgs mechanism penetrates for a length λ 1/M / venerdì 21 settembre 12 BCS-BEC crossover v correlation length ⇠ F ⇠ ∆ vs 1/3 average distance n− up down 1/3 ⇠ n− BCS fermi surface phenomenon venerdì 21 settembre 12 BCS-BEC crossover v correlation length ⇠ F ⇠ ∆ vs 1/3 average distance n− up down g weak 1/3 ⇠ n− BCS fermi surface phenomenon strong venerdì 21 settembre 12 BCS-BEC crossover v correlation length ⇠ F ⇠ ∆ vs 1/3 average distance n− up down g weak 1/3 ⇠ n− BCS fermi surface phenomenon 1/3 BCS-BEC crossover ⇠ n− depleting the Fermi sphere ⇠ strong venerdì 21 settembre 12 BCS-BEC crossover v correlation length ⇠ F ⇠ ∆ vs 1/3 average distance n− up down g weak 1/3 ⇠ n− BCS fermi surface phenomenon 1/3 BCS-BEC crossover ⇠ n− depleting the Fermi sphere ⇠ strong BEC 1/3 4 ⇠ n− equivalent to He ⌧ venerdì 21 settembre 12 COLOR SUPERCONDUCTIVITY venerdì 21 settembre 12 A bit of history • Quark matter inside compact stars, Ivanenko and Kurdgelaidze (1965), Paccini (1966) ... • Quark Cooper pairing was proposed by Ivanenko and Kurdgelaidze (1969) • With asymptotic freedom (1973) more robust results by Collins and Perry (1975), Baym and Chin (1976) • Classification of some color superconducting phases: Bailin and Love (1984) venerdì 21 settembre 12 A bit of history • Quark matter inside compact stars, Ivanenko and Kurdgelaidze (1965), Paccini (1966) ... • Quark Cooper pairing was proposed by Ivanenko and Kurdgelaidze (1969) • With asymptotic freedom (1973) more robust results by Collins and Perry (1975), Baym and Chin (1976) • Classification of some color superconducting phases: Bailin and Love (1984) Interesting studies but predicted small energy gaps ~ 10 ÷100 keV negligible phenomenological impact for compact stars venerdì 21 settembre 12 A bit of history • Quark matter inside compact stars, Ivanenko and Kurdgelaidze (1965), Paccini (1966) ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diffractive Dissociation of Alpha Particles As a Test of Isophobic Short-Range Correlations Inside Nuclei ∗ Jennifer Rittenhouse West A, , Stanley J
    Physics Letters B 805 (2020) 135423 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Diffractive dissociation of alpha particles as a test of isophobic short-range correlations inside nuclei ∗ Jennifer Rittenhouse West a, , Stanley J. Brodsky a, Guy F. de Téramond b, Iván Schmidt c a SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309, USA b Laboratorio de Física Teórica y Computacional, Universidad de Costa Rica, 11501 San José, Costa Rica c Departamento de Física y Centro Científico Tecnológico de Valparáiso-CCTVal, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Casilla 110-V, Valparaíso, Chile a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The CLAS collaboration at Jefferson Laboratory has compared nuclear parton distributions for a range Received 15 January 2020 of nuclear targets and found that the EMC effect measured in deep inelastic lepton-nucleus scattering Received in revised form 9 April 2020 has a strongly “isophobic” nature. This surprising observation suggests short-range correlations between Accepted 9 April 2020 neighboring n and p nucleons in nuclear wavefunctions that are much stronger compared to p − p or n − Available online 14 April 2020 n correlations. In this paper we propose a definitive experimental test of the nucleon-nucleon explanation Editor: W. Haxton of the isophobic nature of the EMC effect: the diffractive dissociation on a nuclear target A of high energy 4 He nuclei to pairs of nucleons n and p with high relative transverse momentum, α + A → n + p + A + X. The comparison of n − p events with p − p and n − n events directly tests the postulated breaking of isospin symmetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit VI Superconductivity JIT Nashik Contents
    Unit VI Superconductivity JIT Nashik Contents 1 Superconductivity 1 1.1 Classification ............................................. 1 1.2 Elementary properties of superconductors ............................... 2 1.2.1 Zero electrical DC resistance ................................. 2 1.2.2 Superconducting phase transition ............................... 3 1.2.3 Meissner effect ........................................ 3 1.2.4 London moment ....................................... 4 1.3 History of superconductivity ...................................... 4 1.3.1 London theory ........................................ 5 1.3.2 Conventional theories (1950s) ................................ 5 1.3.3 Further history ........................................ 5 1.4 High-temperature superconductivity .................................. 6 1.5 Applications .............................................. 6 1.6 Nobel Prizes for superconductivity .................................. 7 1.7 See also ................................................ 7 1.8 References ............................................... 8 1.9 Further reading ............................................ 10 1.10 External links ............................................. 10 2 Meissner effect 11 2.1 Explanation .............................................. 11 2.2 Perfect diamagnetism ......................................... 12 2.3 Consequences ............................................. 12 2.4 Paradigm for the Higgs mechanism .................................. 12 2.5 See also ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Pair-Density-Wave Superconducting and Superfluid States
    Surface Pair-Density-Wave Superconducting and Superfluid States Mats Barkman,1 Albert Samoilenka,1 and Egor Babaev1 1Department of Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Fulde, Ferrell, Larkin, and Ovchinnikov (FFLO) predicted inhomogeneous superconducting and superfluid ground states, spontaneously breaking translation symmetries. In this Letter, we demon- strate that the transition from the FFLO to the normal state as a function of temperature or increased Fermi surface splitting is not a direct one. Instead the system has an additional phase transition to a different state where pair-density-wave superconductivity (or superfluidity) exists only on the boundaries of the system, while the bulk of the system is normal. The surface pair- density-wave state is very robust and exists for much larger fields and temperatures than the FFLO state. In regular BCS theory, the formation of Cooper pairs The Ginzburg-Landau description of superconductors binding together two electrons with opposite spin and op- in the presence of Zeeman splitting was derived from mi- posite momentum results in a uniform superconducting croscopic theory in Ref. [31]. The free energy functional state [1,2]. In 1964, Fulde and Ferrell [3] and Larkin and R d reads F [ ] = Ω d x where the free energy density is Ovchinnikov [4] (FFLO) independently predicted that F F under certain conditions there should appear an inho- =α 2 + β 2 + γ 4 + δ 2 2+ mogeneous state in the presence of a strong magnetic F j j jr jµ j j jr j (1) µ 2 2 + ( ∗)2( )2 + c.c. + ν 6; field, where Zeeman splitting of the Fermi surfaces leads j j jr j 8 r j j to the formation of Cooper pairs with nonzero total mo- mentum.
    [Show full text]
  • Three-Flavor Color Superconductivity
    Three-Flavor Color Superconductivity Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften vorgelegt beim Fachbereich Physik der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universit¨at in Frankfurt am Main von Hossein Malekzadeh aus dem Iran Frankfurt am Main, Dezember 2007 (D 30) 2 vom Fachbereich Physik der Johann Wolfgang Goethe–Universit¨at als Dissertation angenommen. Dekan: Prof. Dr. W. Aßmus Gutachter: Prof. Dr. D.-H. Rischke, Prof. Dr. Adrian Dumitru Datum der Disputation: Dezember 7, 2007. Acknowledgements I would like to express my special thanks to Prof. Dirk Rischke for all the generous supports that during my Ph.D thesis he gave mentally and practically to me. I learned a lot of things from him which will be certainly very useful for me in future as well. Without his helps and encouragements it would be difficult to come to the end of this thesis. Thank you Dirk! I am also very grateful to Prof. Igor Shovkovy for very instructive discussions we had. He was the one who taught this stimulating field to me. Also, I had a lot of fun with him during lunch breaks and in other occasions. Since I wanted to take ten watermelons with my tow hands, I needed to work harder. On other words, along my Ph.D thesis, I wanted to work on other fields as well, although the project were not published. I had great times when I was collaborating with Prof. Adrian Dumitru and Prof. Michael Strickland. I thank both of you for teaching me those fascinating topics. I also had a wonderful chance to talk to Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Conventional Superconductors 1 Bogoliubov-De
    Conventional superconductors 1 Bogoliubov-de Gennes equation for inhomogeneous superconductivity: application to vortex core states, (De Gennes’s book ) Caroli, De Gennes, Matricon, Phys. Lett. 9; 307 (1964). 2 “Concept of off-diagonal long range order and the quantum phases of liquid He and of superconductors”, C. N. Yang, Rev. Mod. Phys 34, 694, 1962. 3 Anderson theorem for disordered superconductors, “Theory of dirty superconductors”, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 11, 26 (1959). 4 Yu-Shiba state: magnetic impurity in superconductor, Yu L. Acta Phys. Sinica, 21, 75 1965; H. Shiba, Prog. Theor. Phys. 40, 435 1968. 5 McMillan formula, “Transition Temperature of Strong-Coupled Superconductors”, Physical Review, vol. 167, 331-344(1968). 6 FFLO state, Inhomogeneous superconductivity in condensed matter and QCD Roberto Casalbuoni and Giuseppe Nardulli, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 263 (2004). 7 Superconductivity in fullerides O. Gunnarsson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 575 – Published 31 March 1997 He-3 and other p-wave systems 8 A deeper study on He-3, “A theoretical description of the new phases of liquid He-3”, Anthony Leggett, RMP 47, 331 (1975). 9 p-wave pairing, “The superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 and the physics of spin triplet pairing”, Rev. Mod. Physics 75, 657, (2003). 10 Toplogical defect in He-3, “Quantized vortices in superfluid He3”, M. M. Salomaa and G. E. Volovik, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 533 (1987). 11 Majorana fermions, arXiv:cond-mat/0010440, “Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires”, Alexei Kitaev High Tc superconductivity 12 Effective models of high Tc: Zhang-Rice singlet of high Tc, Phys. Rev. B, 37, 3759 (1988); Emery, Thoery of high Tc superconductivity in oxides, PRL 58, 2794 (1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Color Superconductivity in Quark Matter Mark Alford Washington University Saint Louis, USA
    Fedora GNU/Linux; LATEX 2ǫ; xfig Color superconductivity in quark matter Mark Alford Washington University Saint Louis, USA 1 Outline I Quarks at high density Cooper pairing, color superconductivity II Color superconducting phases Pairing vs. the strange quark mass III Compact stars Transport properties and signatures IV Looking to the future M. Alford, K. Rajagopal, T. Sch¨afer, A. Schmitt, arXiv:0709.4635 (RMP review) 2 I. Quarks at high density Quarks: Building blocks of matter atom: nucleus & electrons Quarks have color and flavor (“up” or “down”) proton: uud, uud, uud neutron: udd, udd, udd neutron/proton: 3 quarks bound by color force, Quantum Chromo Dynamics (QCD) 3 Interactions between Quarks Dominant interaction between quarks is the strong interaction, described by SU(3) “color” non-Abelian gauge theory (QCD). Properties of QCD • Short distances, r ≪ 1 fm, asymptotically free : g gauge coupling g ≪ 1, single gluon exchange dom- inates, the theory is analytically tractable. g • Long distances r > 1 fm, QCD confines : color electric fields form flux tubes, only color-neutral states, baryons and mesons, exist. baryon meson 4 Cooper pairing in quark matter: color superconductivity At sufficiently high density and low temperature, there is a Fermi sea of almost free quarks. Any attractive quark-quark interaction causes pairing instability of the Fermi surface: BCS mechanism of superconductivity. dF F = E − µN =0 µ = EF dN E QCD attractive quark-quark interaction p in color-antisymmetric channel: - single gluon exchange - instanton interaction - strong coupling: count flux tubes - confinement is attraction BCS in quark matter: Ivanenko and Kurdgelaidze, Lett. Nuovo Cim.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Tetraquarks and the Chiral Phase Transition
    Light tetraquarks and the chiral phase transition Vladimir Skokov, RIKEN/BNL Research Center & RDP: 1606.04111 XYZ, Pc states: strong evidence for tetraquark & pentaquark states, composed of both light and heavy quarks Why do we need heavy quarks to see tetraquark states? Jaffe ’79…Schechter…Close…Tornqvist…Maiani…Giacosa….Peleaz ’15: “the” σ meson is “a” tetraquark (diquark anti-diquark). But situation murky…. Punchline: tetraquarks must be included to understand the phase diagram of QCD (versus quark mass, plane of temperature T and baryon chemical potential μ) Tetraquarks: for three (not two) flavors of very light quarks, tetraquarks may generate a second chiral phase transition For QCD, in the plane of T & μ plane: direct connection between tetraquarks and color superconductivity in effective modesl, need tetraquarks to determine the Critical EndPoint Tetraquarks for two light flavors: meh, fuh gedda ‘boud it Chiral symmetry for two flavors Classically, chiral symmetry Gcl = SU(2)L x SU(2)R x U(1)A = O(4) x O(2) Use φ, complex 4-component vector φ =(σ + i ⌘ , ~a + i ~⇡ ) Linear σ model for exact χ symmetry: 0 cl 1 2 1 2 2 = (@ φ) + m φ⇤ φ + λ (φ⇤ φ) + ... L 2 µ 2 · · Quantum mechanically, axial anomaly reduces U(1)A -> Z(2)A : φ → (−) φ Simplest term which is only Z(2)A invariant: A =+m2 (Im φ)2 + ... L A With Gcl , η degenerate with π . With axial anomaly, η splits from massless π Directly induced by instantons + … Diquarks and tetraquarks for two flavors Jaffe ’79: most attractive channel for quark-quark scattering is antisym.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonperturbative Phenomena in QCD at Finite Temperature
    Physics of Atomic Nuclei, Vol. 68, No. 5, 2005, pp. 723–747. Translated from Yadernaya Fizika, Vol. 68, No. 5, 2005, pp. 755–779. Original Russian Text Copyright c 2005 by Agasian. Nonperturbative Phenomena in QCD at Finite Temperature N. O. Agasian* Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Bol’shaya Cheremushkinskaya ul. 25, Moscow, 117259 Russia Received July 26, 2004 Abstract—The main objective of the present study is to analyze various nonperturbative phenomena in QCDboth at low, T<Tc, and at high, T>Tc, temperatures. New methods are developed that make it possible, on one hand, to describe data obtained by numerically simulating QCDon a lattice and, on the other hand, to study new physical phenomena in QCDat finite temperature. c 2005 Pleiades Publish- ing, Inc. 1. INTRODUCTION which was predicted theoretically in recent years (for an overview, see [3–5]), can be realized. The physics of strong interactions, QCD, has been flourishing over the past three decades. For many Quantum chromodynamics is a quantum the- years, investigations into the behavior of strongly in- ory of Yang–Mills gauge fields interacting with quark fermion fields. The asymptotic-freedom phe- teracting matter under various external effects have nomenon [6, 7] and a topologically nontrivial struc- been of great topical interest. In the real world, these ture of the vacuum of non-Abelian gauge theories [8– are primarily temperature and the baryon density. In- 12] were discovered in the 1970s. A further devel- terest in the behavior of matter under extreme con-
    [Show full text]
  • Light Tetraquarks and the Chiral Phase Transition
    Light tetraquarks and the chiral phase transition Vladimir Skokov, RIKEN/BNL Research Center & RDP: 1606.04111 XYZ, Pc states: strong evidence for tetraquark & pentaquark states, composed of both light and heavy quarks Why do we need heavy quarks to see tetraquark states? Jaffe ’79…Schechter…Close…Tornqvist…Maiani…Giacosa….Peleaz ’15: “the” ! meson is “a” tetraquark (diquark anti-diquark). But situation murky…. Punchline: tetraquarks must be included to understand the phase diagram of QCD (versus quark mass, plane of temperature T and baryon chemical potential ") Tetraquarks: for three (not two) flavors of very light quarks, tetraquarks may generate a second chiral phase transition For QCD, in the plane of T & " plane: direct connection between tetraquarks and color superconductivity in effective modesl, need tetraquarks to determine the Critical EndPoint Need tetraquarks to find the critical endpoint Kovacs, Szep, & Wolf, 1601.05291: Use linear ! model + Polyakov loop model And add vector mesons (good!). But do not include tetraquarks. Find a critical endpoint (CEP), but T so low, CEP would have been seen exp’y! T! !!CEP "baryon" Tetraquarks for two light flavors: meh, fuh gedda ‘boud it Chiral symmetry for two flavors Classically, chiral symmetry Gcl = SU(2)L x SU(2)R x U(1)A = O(4) x O(2) Use #, complex 4-component vector φ =(σ + i η , a + i π ) Linear ! model for exact $ symmetry: 0 cl 1 2 1 2 2 = (∂ φ) + m φ∗ φ + λ (φ∗ φ) + ... L 2 µ 2 · · Quantum mechanically, axial anomaly reduces U(1)A -> Z(2)A : # " (') # Simplest term which is only Z(2)A invariant: A =+m2 (Im φ)2 + ..
    [Show full text]
  • Two Lectures on Color Superconductivity
    Two lectures on color superconductivity∗ Igor A. Shovkovy† Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies and Institut f¨ur Theoretische Physik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universit¨at, D-60054 Frankurt am Main, Germany February 4, 2008 Abstract The first lecture provides an introduction to the physics of color superconductivity in cold dense quark matter. The main color su- perconducting phases are briefly described and their properties are listed. The second lecture covers recent developments in studies of color superconducting phases in neutral and β-equilibrated matter. The properties of gapless color superconducting phases are discussed. arXiv:nucl-th/0410091v2 8 Nov 2004 ∗Lectures delivered at the IARD 2004 conference, Saas Fee, Switzerland, June 12 - 19, 2004, and at the Helmholtz International Summer School and Workshop on Hot points in Astrophysics and Cosmology, JINR, Dubna, Russia, August 2 - 13, 2004. †On leave from Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, 03143, Kiev, Ukraine. 1 Contents 1 Introduction into color superconductivity 3 1.1 Densebaryonicmatter . .. .. 3 1.1.1 Weakly interacting quark matter . 4 1.2 Cooper instability and color superconductivity . ... 5 1.3 Two-flavor color superconductivity (Nf =2).......... 7 1.3.1 Color and flavor structure of the condensate . 10 1.3.2 Quark propagator in the Nambu-Gorkov basis . 11 1.3.3 One-gluon exchange interaction . 12 1.3.4 GapequationinQCD . 15 1.3.5 GapequationintheNJLmodel . 17 1.3.6 Properties of quark matter in the 2SC phase . 19 1.4 Color-flavor locked phase (Nf =3) ............... 21 1.4.1 Properties of quark matter in the CFL phase . 23 1.4.2 Low-energyeffectiveaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Activities in 2009
    II Summary of activities in 2009 1. THEORETICAL NUCLEAR PHYSICS GROUP 1 Theoretical Nuclear Physics Group Subjects: Structure and reactions of unstable nuclei, Monte Carlo Shell Model, Molecular Orbit Method, Mean Field Calculations, Quantum Chaos Quark-Gluon Plasma, Lattice QCD simulations, Structure of Hadrons, Color superconductivity, cold atoms, graphene Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Relativistic Hydrodynamics, Color Glass Con- densate Member: Takaharu Otsuka, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Tetsufumi Hirano, Noritaka Shimizu and Shoichi Sasaki In the nuclear theory group, a wide variety of subjects are studied. The subjects are divided into three major categories: Nuclear Structure Physics, Quantum Hadron Physics and High Energy Hadron Physics. Nuclear Structure Physics In the Nuclear Structure group (T. Otsuka and N. Shimizu), quantum many-body problems for atomic nuclei, various issues on nuclear forces and their combinations are studied theoretically from many angles. The major subjects are the structure of unstable exotic nuclei, shell model calculations including Monte Carlo Shell Model, reactions between heavy nuclei, Bose-Einstein condensation, symmetries and quantum chaos, etc. The structure of unstable nuclei is the major focus of our interests, and examples of the current subjects are the disappearance of conventional magic numbers and appearance of new ones. These phenomena are due to the change of the shell structure (shell evolution), and are largely due to nuclear forces such as the tensor force and the three-body force. Many papers with strong impacts have been published by our group in recent years, such as [1]. The structure of such unstable nuclei have been calculated by Monte Carlo Shell Model and conventional shell model [2], and their applications have been made in collaborations with experimentalists [3, 4].
    [Show full text]
  • Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks Arxiv:1706.00610V2
    DESY 17-071 Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks Ahmed Ali,1 Jens S¨orenLange,2 and Sheldon Stone3 1DESY Theory Group, Notkestrasse 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany 2Justus-Liebig-Universit¨atGiessen, II. Physikalisches Institut, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 16, D-35392 Giessen, Germany 3Physics Department, 201 Physics Building, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1130, USA July 31, 2017 Abstract For many decades after the invention of the quark model in 1964 there was no evidence that hadrons are formed from anything other than the simplest pairings of quarks and antiquarks, mesons being formed of a quark-antiquark pair and baryons from three quarks. In the last decade, however, in an explosion of data from both e+e− and hadron colliders, there are many recently observed states that do not fit into this picture. These new particles are called generically \ex- otics". They can be either mesons or baryons. Remarkably, they all decay into at least one meson formed of either a cc or bb pair. In this review, after the introduction, we explore each of these new discoveries in detail first from an experimental point of view, then subsequently give a theo- retical discussion. These exotics can be explained if the new mesons contain two-quarks and two- antiquarks (tetraquarks), while the baryons contain four-quarks plus an antiquark (pentaquarks). The theoretical explanations for these states take three divergent tracks: tightly bound objects, just as in the case of normal hadrons, but with more constituents, or loosely bound \molecules" similar to the deuteron, but formed from two mesons, or a meson or baryon, or more wistfully, they are not multiquark states but appear due to kinematic effects caused by different rescatterings of virtual particles; most of these models have all been post-dictions.
    [Show full text]