Newsletter 210 May 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Furniture History Society Newsletter 210 May 2018 In this issue: Chippendale 2018 : A Curatorial Memoir | Future Society Events | Occasional and Overseas Visits | Other Notices | Book Reviews | Reports on the Society’s Events | Publications | Grants Chippendale 2018: A Curatorial Memoir ike most organizations dedicated to the with substantial funding from the Heritage L memory of a great person, the Lottery Fund. We therefore made an Chippendale Society has often used informal approach to the Yorkshire HLF to anniversaries to promote its cause. The discuss a similar strategy. It soon became Society was in its infancy in 1968 at the clear, however, that the Society lacked the time of the 250 th anniversary of capacity to facilitate anything so ambitious, Chippendale senior’s birth, but keenly despite the resources which the HLF might endorsed the exhibition Thomas Chippendale provide. At the same time, it was noted that and his Patrons in the North with a number the HLF has never been an enthusiastic of commemorative events. Ten years later, promoter of temporary exhibitions. in 1979 , its newly formed collection of Somewhat dejected we reconsidered the drawings made an important contribution options and, undeterred, we began a series to the exhibition marking the bicentenary of informal conversations with other of his death, held at Temple Newsam, like interested parties, particularly, at this the earlier one. Again, in 2004 , the Society stage, with Nostell Priory. A meeting was marked the quarter millennium of the first convened there in March 2016 , with edition of the Director by publishing a invitations sent to representatives from facsimile reprint of its own rare copy. houses and organizations (including the FHS and the Master Carvers’ Association), Chippendale 300 which we knew might be interested in With the approach of the tercentenary of coming together with a coordinated plan Chippendale’s birth in 1718 , the committee for 2018 . Thus was born the group, which of the Society, led by Adam Bowett, became known as Chippendale 300 . Chairman, and myself, Honorary Curator, Subsequent meetings at Leeds developed looked for new and different ways of this project further with a message of good marking this significant anniversary. An will from Prince Charles, the creation of a inspired model was then being established logo, a website, a PR campaign and the with the Capability Brown tercentenary for promise of a nationwide postal mark for 2016 , which we followed with interest. This 5 June 2018 . involved the participation of many different historic parks in a coordinated The Venue: Leeds City Museum programme of exhibitions, events and While the Chippendale 300 partnership learning opportunities across the country, was evolving, our attention was equally 2 furniture history society newsletter, no. 210, may 2018 preoccupied with the prospects of an a recent £2m refit, was considered exhibition. Initially, we lobbied a national inappropriate as a venue for historic museum to put on a major show. For decorative art. various reasons, and despite the The location of the City Museum had enthusiasm of individual curators, this advantages and disadvantages: on the one bold idea came to nothing, although a hand, it is a prime city-centre site, with number of smaller and more focused free admission (including to all temporary projects were instigated. Again, exhibitions) attracting thousands of undeterred, we decided to organize one visitors, including hopefully the potential ourselves in Leeds, not least because the new audience, which was one of the city is just 12 miles from Chippendale’s raisons d’être for the show. On the other home town of Otley where he has been hand, Cuthbert Brodrick’s magnificent revered as a local hero for at least the past building, originally the Leeds Institute, 100 years. Our conversations with the staff had been adapted ten years previously as at Leeds Museums and Galleries the award-winning new City Museum eventually led to a unique partnership in containing an anthology of the city’s which it was agreed that the Society would huge archaeological, natural history, curate the exhibition and raise 90 per cent anthropology and social history of the necessary funding through collections. An L-shaped exhibition gallery sponsorship, while Leeds would provide of 300 square metres had been created in the venue and administration. The the roof space, with exposed beams, Exhibition Gallery of the City Museum tracking and highly visible — not to say was chosen (Fig. 1) — Temple Newsam intrusive — ducting hardware. The having had its fill of previous Chippendale maximum usable height is just 9 feet, exhibitions, while the Art Gallery, despite thereby ruling out tall objects such as pier Fig. 1 Entrance to the exhibition at Leeds City Museum furniture history society newsletter, no. 210, may 2018 3 glasses or state beds (the generous offer of ideological issues were to be avoided and one of the Stanway Chinese day beds had a mainstream art-historical interpretation to be resisted). The design problems adopted. Some real showstoppers were to caused by these constraints were be sought out, hopefully some ‘new eventually overcome by a combination of discoveries’ would emerge and old the choice of loans, a uniform black favourites shown in a different light. We painted backdrop (relieved with panels of did not intend being dogmatic: not every appropriate wallpaper loaned by de object in the exhibition had to be proven to Gournay) and effective spot and wash be from the master’s workshop, but lighting. These features focused visitors’ everything had to have a connection with attention at eye level and below. the great man and hold its own in a The show would fit into the museum’s continuing narrative. The key was to use first exhibition period for 2018, opening in the neutral space of this ‘black box’ to set time for a predicted surge in visitors at up interesting juxtapositions and provide February half-term. It would run until 9 links and conversations between groups of June, just after the actual anniversary of objects. Chippendale’s baptism on 5 June 1718. There would be five sections: This worked well with the idea which Chippendale senior’s Life and Career; emerged that the exhibition would be the Style: his work in the Rococo, Chinese, opening showcase event for the wider Gothic, Transitional and ‘Antique’ tastes; Chippendale300 project — particularly as his Relationship with his Clients; the many of the loans came from properties operation of his Workshop; and his Legacy which would open to visitors later in the (including the impact of the Director, the spring or early summer. Chippendale revivals and his enduring ‘brand’). In the event, the Workshop Basic Principles section had to be dropped because of lack Having thus established a venue and a of space, and the ideas it explored merged date, a core team of four curators from the with other sections. Society’s membership was formed to develop a curatorial plan (in the event, one Funding member dropped out almost at the start, Nothing could be done without the and another two-thirds of the way through necessary funding. An approximate the project). It was agreed that the main budget was established: £108,000 to pay purpose was to celebrate Thomas for all the direct costs (transport, Chippendale senior’s work both as a conservation, installation hardware, designer, craftsman and businessman, and interpretation, graphics, public relations). to bring an understanding of his Hidden costs such as staff time and in- achievement and enjoyment of his work to house technical work would be subsumed the widest possible number of people, into Leeds’ general budgets. The curators experts or beginners. Contentious were to be paid their modest fees by 4 furniture history society newsletter, no. 210, may 2018 Leeds. There was no budget for an outside we were advised should sell at a designer — this was left to the curatorial maximum of £5 in the museum shop, and team, and above all to the Exhibitions which could also have a useful after-life. Curator for the City Museum, Ruth A first print run, with design and Martin, whose use of the Sketchup photography, was estimated at £6,000. But computer program in demonstrating as time progressed our sponsors were alternative layouts was to prove essential. adamant that they wished to see a full Ruth was the crucial anchor for the whole catalogue, lavishly illustrated, with essays show and the link between the curators and discursive text for each of the ninety- and the museum. Leeds also took on a five objects in the exhibition. They were once-a-week Project Registrar, Christine willing to pay for this as a separate Bradley, who was to organize the loan venture, and estimates of some £22,000 agreements, Government Indemnity and were quoted. This unexpected transport arrangements. development greatly increased the Both the Chippendale Society and workload of the two remaining curators, Leeds Museums and Galleries have a long who nevertheless embraced it and fruitful relationship with the wholeheartedly. The problem of obtaining Monument Trust. We naturally turned to consistently good photography for loans them as our first port of call, and the coming from different parts of the British trustees generously agreed to fund 50 per Isles was overcome by scheduling this cent of the total budget, making them our after the objects had arrived in Leeds. It principal sponsor. With this established we meant, of course, that the catalogue could felt confident in approaching other not be ready until at least two months after funders: those providing between £5,000 the exhibition had opened, but this was and £10,000 becoming ‘sponsors’ deemed acceptable if it could coincide (including a substantial input from the with the annual FHS Symposium to be Society’s own resources, the profits of held in Leeds on 14 April.