VIAS SITA Telegrammer Kursus 29-11-2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A. -
(EWG) Nr. 2407/92 Vorgesehene Beschränkung
22 . 12 . 94 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr. C 366/9 Veröffentlichung der Entscheidungen der Mitgliedstaaten über die Erteilung oder den Widerruf von Betriebsgenehmigungen nach Artikel 13 Absatz 4 der Verordnung ( EWG) Nr. 2407/92 über die Erteilung von Betriebsgenehmigungen an Luftfahrtunternehmen (') (94/C 366/06) NORWEGEN Erteilte Betriebsgenehmigungen ( 2 ) Kategorie A : Betriebsgenehmigungen ohne die in Artikel 5 Absatz 7 Buchstabe a) der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2407/92 vorgesehene Beschränkung Name des Anschrift des Luftfahrtunternehmens Berechtigt zur Entscheidung Luftfahrtunternehmens Beförderung von rechtswirksam seit Air Express AS Postboks 5 , 1330 Oslo Lufthavn Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 9 . 11 . 1993 AS Lufttransport Postboks 2500, 9002 Tromsø Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 15 . 7 . 1994 AS Mørefly Aalesund Lufthavn, 6040 Vigra Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 6 . 12 . 1993 Braathens SAFE AS Postboks 55 , 1330 Oslo Lufthavn Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 10 . 12 . 1993 Coast Air K/ S Postboks 126 , 4262 Avaldsnes Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 20 . 12 . 1993 Det Norske 1330 Oslo Lufthavn Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 20 . 6 . 1994 Luftfartselskab AS (DNL) Fred . Olsens Flyselskap Postboks 10 , 1330 Oslo Lufthavn Fluggästen , Post, Fracht 6 . 12 . 1993 AS Helikopter Service AS Postboks 522 , 4055 Stavanger Lufthavn Fluggästen , Post, Fracht 10 . 12 . 1993 Helikopterteneste AS 5780 Kinsarvik Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 10 . 12 . 1993 Norwegian Air Shuttle AS Postboks 115 , 1331 Oslo Lufthavn Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 30 . 6 . 1994 Widerøe Norsk Air AS Sandefjord Lufthavn, Torp, 3200 Sandefjord Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 20 . 12 . 1993 Kategorie B : Betriebsgenehmigungen mit der in Artikel 5 Absatz 7 Buchstabe a) der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2407/92 vorgesehenen Beschränkung Name des Anschrift des Luftfahrtunternehmens Berechtigt zur Entscheidung Luftfahrtunternehmens Beförderung von rechtswirksam seit Air Stord AS Stord Lufthavn, 5410 Sagvåg Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 11 . -
TOTALITY! Eclipse Travel Adventures
TOTALITY! eclipse travel adventures The Diamond Ring at C2, showing the Diamond Ring Effect in Svalbard, but unlike the usual images where most observers were, this image was taken by Deidre Sorensen in a rather isolated location away from most other eclipse chasers where the still of the location could best be appreciated. © Deidre Sorensen and used by permission / [email protected] / http://www.deidresorensen.com/#!/index Results: Eclipse in the North Atlantic Booking; 2016 Total Solar Eclipse ECLIPSE IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC Earth – Air – Sea What are the odds of seeing a total solar eclipse in (or near) the Arctic? The answer is very low since the Arctic is quite often overcast. But nothing stops a serious eclipse chaser, even if the chances of seeing the eclipse are slim. Today’s eclipse chasers manage to travel nearly anywhere in the world to some of the most remote locations, viewing eclipses from land (or ice), on the ocean, on mountain tops, or high in the air aboard a jet aircraft. So for the 2015 total eclipse with the weather conditions expected to be marginal from land, eclipse viewing took to all types of viewing locations; on the land, on the sea and in the skies. I am certain that everyone that traveled to the eclipse has a great story (mine will be shared shortly), whether it was clear, or cloudy. For this eclipse only two land areas lay under the path of totality, with the centerline passing over just one. If you were selecting eclipses that had a high probability of clear skies, you would not have picked the one of 20 March 2015. -
Galileo Formats
Galileo Formats October 1998 edition Chapters INDEX Introduction Booking File Air Transportation Fares Cars Hotels LeisureShopper Document Production Queues Client File/TravelScreen Travel Information Miscellaneous SECURITY Sign On H/SON SON/Z217 or Sign on at own office SON/ followed by Z and a 1 to 3 character I.D.; the I.D. can be SON/ZHA initials, a number or a combination of both SON/ZGL4HA Sign on at branch agency SON/ followed by Z, own pseudo city code and a 1 to 3 character I.D. SON/Z7XX1/UMP Sign on at 4 character PCC branch agency SON/ followed by Z, own pseudo city code, second delimiter and 1 to 3 character I.D. SB Change to work area B SA/TA Change to work area A; different duty code TA (Training) SAI/ZHA Sign back into all work areas at own office SAI/ZGL4HA Sign back into all work areas at branch agency; SAI/ followed by Z, own pseudo city code and a 1 to 3 character I.D. Sign Off SAO Temporary sign out; incomplete Booking Files must be ignored or completed SOF Sign off; incomplete Booking Files must be ignored or completed SOF/ZHA Sign off override (at own office); incomplete transactions are not protected SOF/ZGL4HA Sign off override (at branch agency); incomplete transactions are not protected; SOF/ followed by Z, own pseudo city code and a 1 to 3 character I.D. SECURITY Security Profile STD/ZHA Display security profile, for sign on HA; once displayed, password may be changed SDA List security profiles created by user (second level authoriser and above) SDA/ZXXØ List security profiles associated with agency XXØ (second level authoriser and above) STD/ZXX1UMP or Display profile STD/ followed by Z, own pseudo city code, second delimiter if pseudo STD/Z7XX1/UMP city code is 4 characters and 1 to 3 character I.D. -
AIR Hackathon Took Place at Microsoft HQ in Seattle, USA
Seattle, February 2020 The 14th edition of IATA AIR Hackathon took place at Microsoft HQ in Seattle, USA. A total of 21 teams worked during 28 hours nonstop in order to build solutions to enhance booking experience for passengers travelling with mobility aids using NDC APIs and/or tracking of mobility aids (wheelchairs). APIs/Sources available at the event: IATA NDC, Microsoft, Medical Travel Companions, LinkedIn, Air France/KLM, FlightAware, Seattle Airport, Expedia Group and SITA Sponsors • Host Organization: Microsoft • Host Airlines: Delta Air Lines, Air France/KLM and Virgin Atlantic • Gold Sponsors: IBS Software, TIBCO Software, Boeing and Expedia Group • Supporting Organizations: Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, HackAcess Dublin, EqualWeb Digital Accessibility 1 Seattle, February 2020 Best Booking Solution (Corporate Prize) Team Name: AccessKey (https://britishairways.com) Challenge: Booking APIs/Data source used: IATA NDC Project Description: An independent stand-alone service that allows customers to create a personal profile of their assistance needs, within a unique access key. Once a customer has their key, they simply enter it when booking their trip with a participating airline of travel agent to ensure their requirements are added to the booking. Changing or updating the customer’s assistance requirements via their account will automatically update any bookings they have associated to their AccessKey. Team Members: John-Paul Henry, Harry Williams, Simon Kisner, John Casey 2 Seattle, February 2020 Best Wheelchair Tracking -
RCED-92-130 Computer Reservation Systems
-.- I Jnikd States General Accounting Office Report to the Ranking Minority Member, GAO Subcommittee on Aviation, Committee on Public Works and Transportation, House of Representatives COMPUTER RESERVATION SYSTEMS Action Needed to Better Monitor the CRS Industry and Eliminate CRS Biases I 146269IX i United States General Accounting OfPice GAO Washington, D.C. 20648 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-247612 March 20,1992 The Honorable William F. Clinger, Jr. Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Aviation Committee on Public Works and Transportation House of Representatives Dear Mr. Clinger: Since they were first offered to travel agents in 197677, airline-owned computer reservation systems (CRS)have come to be used for over 90 percent of travel agents’ domestic airline sales.’ In past reports and testimonies, we have expressed concern about restrictive marketing practices associated with cass that make it difficult for non-cR5s-owning airlines to compete in the markets of the airlines that own the cxss2 This report focuses on an issue we have not addressed in our previous reports-possible biases toward the airline whose internal reservation system is housed within the CRSit owns. Such systems are called “hosted” CRSSbecause the internal reservation system for the airline that owns the CRSis hosted within the CRSand uses some of the same hardware, software, and databases that operate the CRS.Several airlines and the two smallest CRSvendors believe that the design, or “architecture,” of hosted CRSSmakes it easier and more reliable to obtain information and book flights on the host au-line than on other participating airlines? This “architectural bias” could undermine airline competition by artificially transferring passengers-and therefore revenues-from airlines that do not control CRSSto those that do, thus contributing to a less than level playing field for marketing airline services. -
Developments in Norwegian Offshore Helicopter Safety Final
Developments in Norwegian Offshore Helicopter Safety Knut Lande Former Project Pilot and Chief Technical Pilot in Helikopter Service AS www.landavia.no Experience Aircraft Technician, RNoAF Mechanical Engineer, KTI/Sweden Fighter Pilot, RNoAF Aeronautical Engineer, CIT/RNoAF Test Pilot, USAF/RNoAF (Fighters, Transports, Helicopters) Chief Ops Department, Rygge Air Base Project Pilot New Helicopters/Chief Technical Pilot, Helikopter Service AS (1981-2000) Inspector of Accidents/Air Safety Investigator, AIBN (2000-2009) General Manager/Flight Safety Advisor, LandAvia Ltd (2009- ) Lecturer, Flight Mechanics, University of Agder/Grimstad (UiA) (2014- ) Sola Conference Safety Award/Solakonferansens Sikkerhetspris 2009 Introduction On Friday 23rd of August 2013 an AS332L2 crashed during a non-precision instrument approach to Sumburgh Airport, Shetland. The crash initiated panic within UK Oil and Gas industry, demanding grounding of the Super Puma fleet of helicopters. Four people died when the CHC Super Puma crashed on approach to Sumburgh Airport on 23 August 2013. 1 All Super Puma helicopter passenger flights to UK oil installations were suspended after a crash off Shetland claimed the lives of four people. The Helicopter Safety Steering Group (HSSG) had advised grounding all variants of the helicopter. The HSSG, which is made up of oil industry representatives, advised that all models of the Super Puma series including: AS332 L, L1, L2 and EC225 should be grounded for "all Super Puma commercial passenger flights to and from offshore oil and gas installations within the UK." The Norwegian civil aviation authority had earlier rejected appeals from its unions to ground all its Super Pumas – which operate in the North Sea in very similar weather conditions to the UK fleet – insisting that Friday's crash was an isolated incident. -
London Gatwick Norwegian Terminal
London Gatwick Norwegian Terminal Chauncey still peeks trickishly while passionate Desmond clouds that broadcloths. Affectional and reverberatory Weber instigate so sincerely that Wilhelm traveling his besiegers. Worsening and pagurian Roarke pronks almost fashionably, though Silvan hoicks his disclamations diffracts. They eye and six times a at long line with the following the london gatwick terminal building like an airline industry But after arriving in global network for savvy travellers have an airline said. Wizz air here from london gatwick norwegian terminal. Price Forecast tool help me choose the right time to buy my flight down from Austin to London Gatwick Airport? Online booking is also a week from these may receive a few hours or use of entertainment system for london gatwick norwegian terminal, and better accommodate travelers can also serves as part. The chaos in the gatwick to london gatwick terminal south terminal, and very courteous and from manhattan or booked as she had boarding the gatwick international airport. Links to show off a crowd blocking access to have more waiting for a new protective safety of some of flying again later this is managed a notification. Lack of norwegian air and manchester airports, following a very crowded, we were very pricey, a meltdown after. How amazing screens or errors from derby to give you fly between the chartbeat. Works with peas and i needed between premium seat with competing at airport. Might not work for lounge looks like an indispensable guide and so when traveling for this traveller even though there in addition, i asked me choose from european airlines. -
11. Working with the Airlines in the Australasia-Pacific Region
11 Working with the airlines in the Australasia-Pacific region With my tenure at the new Unisys on shaky ground, I asked former colleagues if they knew of a job opportunity for someone with my skill set. I certainly wanted to stay in the Asia-Pacific area. New Zealand, as a relatively small country, did not present any immediate opportunities other than working with a computer consultancy or setting up on my own, and I was not keen on the latter. Richard Hawkins had left Unisys in Hong Kong and joined the Société Internationale de Télécommunications Aéronautiques (SITA). He had already spoken to SITA on my behalf and advised me to call Ms Irene Legay in SITA’s Hong Kong office. The SITA opportunity was attractive. I knew the organisation and had overseen its Sperry installations in Bangkok and Jakarta. I knew SITA to be technically aggressive. It used Sperry second-level communication processors, without mainframes, for its communications network, and I had recently liaised with SITA when the New Zealand Defence Department had contemplated a similar application. After the end of World War II, international telephone lines had been hard to obtain, so the airlines decided it would be to their advantage to pool resources. SITA was set up to control those resources and provide additional services. In the 1980s, as SITA approached its 40th anniversary, director general Claude Lalanne had instructed McKinsey & Company, as consultants, to investigate the strategies that would keep SITA viable for the next 40 years. McKinsey had recommended that SITA set up 223 ALSO INNOVatoRS a sales and marketing operation — a group of 32 people — to optimise its potential. -
Atlas of Airports
COMPOSMENT TYPOLOGY CONFIGURATION AIRFIELDS NORWAY Norwegian airports with more than 100 000 passengers This airport research combines selected airports that with a certain annual passengers in Norway. The methodology of juxtaposition, the analysis of Terminals, Runway, Airport cities patterns as well as configuration, spatial, morphology, forms, which serve as a base-data for airport design. TYPOLOGY OF AIRPORTS - NORWAY SELECTED AIRPORT ANALYSIS & STUDY con- tent Oslo 3 Bergen 5 Stavanger 7 Trondheim 9 Tromsø 11 Sandefjord 13 Bodø 15 Kristiansand 17 Ålesund 19 Haugesund 21 Narvik and Harstad (Evenes Airport) 23 Alta 25 VMolde 27 Kristiansund 29 Kirkenes 31 Bardufoss 33 Hammerfest 35 Longyearbyen, Svalbard 37 Florø 39 Stokmarknes 41 Mo i Rana 43 Runway 45 Configuration 47 Airport cities 49 Terminals 51 OSL 60°12’10’’N 011°05’02’’E Airport type Public Operator Oslo Lufthavn AS Serves Oslo, Norway Location Gardermoen, Ullensaker, Akershus Runways 3,600/2,950 Passengers 25,788,610 International 14,567,406 Domestic 11,221,204 Aircraft movements 237,618 Cargo (tonnes) 130,301 3 OSL RUNWAY TERMINAL AIRPORT CITY STRUCTURE 1 AIRPORT CITY PATTERN TRANSFER AIRPORT CITY PATTERN The first airports to serve Oslo was Kjeller Airport that opened in 1912 and Gressholmen Airport that served seaplanes after its opening in 1926. The airport location was first used by the Norwegian Army from 1940, with the first military airport facilities being built during the 1940s. An expansion with a new terminal building and a third pier is scheduled to open in 2017.Oslo Airport is the largest and busiest of three major international airports located around Oslo. -
Data Communication and New Information Technologies for Civil Aviation
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Data Communication and New Information Technologies for Civil Aviation Sebestyen, I. IIASA Working Paper WP-83-015 January 1983 Sebestyen, I. (1983) Data Communication and New Information Technologies for Civil Aviation. IIASA Working Paper. WP-83-015 Copyright © 1983 by the author(s). http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/2297/ Working Papers on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis receive only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute, its National Member Organizations, or other organizations supporting the work. All rights reserved. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage. All copies must bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. For other purposes, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, permission must be sought by contacting [email protected] NOT FOR QUOTATION WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE AUTHOR DATA COMMUNICATION AND NEW INFOFGdATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CML AVIATlON Istvan Sebestyen Janurary 1983 WP-83-15 Waking Papers are interim reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and have received only Limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute or of its National Member Organizations. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANfiYSIS 2361 Laxenburg, Austria PREFACE This working paper is part of the IIASA study "Telecommunication Equipment and Administrative Procedures Relevant to Experimental and Operational East-West Computer Connections" supported by the Control Data Corporation, Minneapolis, USA and the Austrian Ministry for Science and Research in Vienna. -
Swissair MD 11
SR 111 Investigation Report How This Report Is Organized This report was prepared in accordance with International Civil Aviation Organization standards and recommended practices,[*] and with Transportation Safety Board (TSB) standards for investigation reports. In keeping with these standards, the report is organized into the following main parts: § Part 1, Factual Information: Provides objective information that is pertinent to the understanding of the circumstances surrounding the occurrence. § Part 2, Analysis: Discusses and evaluates the factual information presented in Part 1 that the Board considered when formulating its conclusions and safety actions. § Part 3, Conclusions: Based on the analyses of the factual information, presents three categories of findings: findings as to causes and contributing factors to the occurrence; findings that expose risks that have the potential to degrade aviation safety, but that could not be shown to have played a direct role in the occurrence; and "other" findings that have the potential to enhance safety, or clarify issues of unresolved ambiguity or controversy. § Part 4, Safety Action: Based on the findings of the investigation, recommends safety actions required to be taken to eliminate or mitigate safety deficiencies, and records the main actions already taken or being taken by the stakeholders involved. Note: Owing to the scope of the Swissair 111 investigation, various supporting technical information (STI) materials are referenced throughout the report. STI materials are peripheral to the report and are not required to develop a complete understanding of the facts, analyses, conclusions, or recommended safety actions. Rather, the STI materials expand, in technical detail, on the information provided in the report.