Identifying Bearded and Ringed Seal Diet- a Comparison Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Identifying Bearded and Ringed Seal Diet- a Comparison Of IDENTIFYING BEARDED AND RINGED SEAL DIET- A COMPARISON OF STOMACH CONTENTS, STABLE ISOTOPES, FATTY ACIDS, AND FECAL DNA By Anna Laura Bryan RECOMMENDED: sarahh HMy, PrTT3. Vdjdsefy Committee Member Lori Quakenbush, M.S. Advisory Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Ph.D. Advisory Committee Co-Chair <& '/i^^&- ^Lara Horstmann-Dehn, PI Advisory Committee Co-Chair k. Diane Wagner, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Biology and Wildlife APPROVED: Paul Layer, Ph.D. Dear^-College of Natural Science and Mathematics ^m^ IDENTIFYING BEARDED AND RINGED SEAL DIET– A COMPARISON OF STOMACH CONTENTS, STABLE ISOTOPES, FATTY ACIDS, AND FECAL DNA A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE By Anna Laura Bryan, B.S. Fairbanks, Alaska August 2014 Title Page Abstract Stomach contents, stable isotopes, fatty acids, and more recently fecal DNA are commonly used to infer the diet of marine mammals. However, how complementary or contradictory these methods are, especially when considering individual diet variability, remains poorly understood. This study assessed the differences in the dietary information resulting from stomach contents, stable isotopes, and fatty acids for adult bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus), and fishes identified from stomach contents and fecal DNA for bearded and ringed seals (Pusa hispida), harvested in Alaska for subsistence use. Stomach contents and fecal DNA provided information on recently consumed prey. In contrast, stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes of muscle and fatty acid profiles of blubber provided information on prey consumed and integrated over a longer time frame, but taxonomic resolution of prey was low. Overall, stomach contents provided the most dietary data, while fecal DNA delivered the least. Using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S gene fragments, only 40% of the fecal samples (12 bearded and one ringed seal) produced detectable DNA suitable for reference gene amplification. Only three fish species could be positively identified in the diet of seals (Arctic cod, Boreogadus saida; shorthorn sculpin, Myoxocephalus scorpius; and an unknown snailfish species, Liparidae) when using fecal DNA. In a dietary comparison, and despite differences in dietary time frames, the relative occurrence (RO) of prey from stomach contents and the mean proportions of prey source groups from a Bayesian stable isotope mixing model (SIAR) were similar. The proportions of indicator fatty acids from full-thickness blubber, such as 16:4n-1, 20:5n-3, 20:4n- 6, 20:1n-9, 22:1n-11, and the presence of non-methylene-interrupted fatty acids were similar to other fatty acid studies of bearded seals in Alaska, and suggest a benthic diet. Overall, the methods yielded different, but not necessarily contradictory results. v Table of Contents Page Signature Page ................................................................................................................................. i Title Page ....................................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... v Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. xi List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. xiii List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ xv Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... xvii Chapter 1: General Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Identifying bearded seal diet – a comparison of individual seals using stomach contents, stable isotopes, and fatty acids ........................................................................................ 9 2.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 14 2.3.1 Field Collections ........................................................................................................... 14 2.3.2 Stomach Content Analysis ........................................................................................... 15 2.3.3 Stable Isotope Analysis ................................................................................................ 16 2.3.4 Fatty Acid Analysis ...................................................................................................... 18 2.3.5 Statistical Analysis ....................................................................................................... 19 2.3.6 Stable Isotope Mixing Model ....................................................................................... 20 2.3.7 Method Comparisons.................................................................................................... 22 2.4 Results ................................................................................................................................. 22 2.4.1 Stomach Content Analysis ........................................................................................... 22 2.4.2 Stable Isotope Analysis ................................................................................................ 23 2.4.3 Fatty Acid Analysis ...................................................................................................... 25 vii 2.5 Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 26 2.6 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 33 2.7 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 34 2.8 References ........................................................................................................................... 35 2.9 Tables .................................................................................................................................. 44 2.10 Figures ............................................................................................................................... 51 2.11 Appendix ........................................................................................................................... 54 Chapter 3: Fish prey in bearded and ringed seal diet – a comparison of stomach contents and fecal DNA ..................................................................................................................................... 57 3.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 57 3.2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 58 3.3 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 61 3.3.1 Sample Collections ....................................................................................................... 61 3.3.2 Stomach Content Analysis ........................................................................................... 62 3.3.3 DNA Extractions .......................................................................................................... 62 3.3.4 PCR Amplifications...................................................................................................... 63 3.3.5 Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis .................................................................... 66 3.4 Results ................................................................................................................................. 68 3.4.1 Stomach Content Analysis ........................................................................................... 68 3.4.2 DNA-Based Diet Analysis ........................................................................................... 69 3.5 Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 71 3.5.1 Seal Diet ....................................................................................................................... 71 3.5.2 Methods Considerations ............................................................................................... 74 3.6 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 77 3.7 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Alaska Sea Lions and Seals
    Alaska Sea Lions and Seals Blaire, Kate, Donovan, & Alex Biodiversity of Alaska 18 June 2017 https://www.stlzoo.org/files/3913/6260/5731/Sea-lion_RogerBrandt.jpg Similarities & Differences of Sea Lions and Seals Phocidae Family Otariidae Family cannot rotate back can rotate back flippers flippers; move like a marine under themselves to walk caterpillar on land mammals and run on land no external earflaps pinniped, “fin external earflaps footed” in use back flippers for Latin use front flippers for power when swimming power when swimming preyed upon by polar use front flippers for use back flippers for bears, orcas, steering when swimming steering when swimming and sharks food: krill, fish, lobster, food: squid, octopus, birds birds, and fish claws and fur on front no claws or hair on front flippers flippers Seals ("What’s the Difference “ 2017) Sea Lions Evolution • Both seals and sea lions are Pinnipeds • Descended from one ancestral line • Belong to order carnivora • Closest living relatives are bears and musteloids (diverged 50 million years ago) http://what-when-how.com/marine-mammals/pinniped-evolution- (Churchill 2015) marine-mammals/ http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2009-04/24/content_7710231.htm Phylogenetics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinniped Steller: Eumetopias jubatus http://www.arkive.org/stellers-sea-lion/eumetopias-jubatus/image-G62602.html Steller: Eumetopias jubatus • Classification (”Steller Sea Lion” 2017) Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mamalia Order: Carnivora Family: Otarridae Genus: Eumetopias Species:
    [Show full text]
  • Some Rare and Insufficiently Studied Snailfish (Liparidae
    International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Zoology Volume 2011, Article ID 341640, 12 pages doi:10.5402/2011/341640 Review Article Some Rare and Insufficiently Studied Snailfish (Liparidae, Scorpaeniformes, Pisces) in the Pacific Waters off the Northern Kuril Islands and Southeastern Kamchatka, Russia A. M. Orlov1 andA.M.Tokranov2 1 Laboratory of Atlantic Basin, Department of International Fisheries Cooperation, Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography (VNIRO), 17 V. Krasnoselskaya, Moscow 107140, Russia 2 Kamchatka Branch of Pacific Institute of Geography, Far East Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 6 Partizanskaya, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky 683000, Russia CorrespondenceshouldbeaddressedtoA.M.Orlov,[email protected] Received 19 January 2011; Accepted 13 March 2011 Academic Editors: D. Park and M. Mooring Copyright © 2011 A. M. Orlov and A. M. Tokranov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Spatial and vertical distributions, size-weight compositions, age, and diets of 10 rare or poorly known snailfish (Liparidae) from the Pacific off the southeastern Kamchatka and the northern Kuril Islands are described. The species include blacktip snailfish Careproctus zachirus, Alaska snailfish C. colletti, blacktail snailfish C. melanurus, proboscis snailfish C. simus, falcate snailfish C. cypselurus, big-disc snailfish Squaloliparis dentatus, longtip snailfish Elassodiscus obscurus, slender snailfish Paraliparis grandis, gloved snailfish Palmoliparis beckeri, and stout snailfish Allocareproctus jordani. These species inhabit a wide range of depths. Careproctus melanurus, C. cypselurus, E. obscurus, P. grandis, and C. colletti are the deepest; C. simus and S. dentatus occur mostly between 300 and 600 m; the three other species seldom occur at depths of 150–200 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait the Following Marine Mammals Are Common to Hudson Strait, However, Other Species May Also Be Seen
    Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait The following marine mammals are common to Hudson Strait, however, other species may also be seen. It’s possible for marine mammals to venture outside of their common habitats and may be seen elsewhere. Bowhead Whale Length: 13-19 m Appearance: Stocky, with large head. Blue-black body with white markings on the chin, belly and just forward of the tail. No dorsal fin or ridge. Two blow holes, no teeth, has baleen. Behaviour: Blow is V-shaped and bushy, reaching 6 m in height. Often alone but sometimes in groups of 2-10. Habitat: Leads and cracks in pack ice during winter and in open water during summer. Status: Special concern Beluga Whale Length: 4-5 m Appearance: Adults are almost entirely white with a tough dorsal ridge and no dorsal fin. Young are grey. Behaviour: Blow is low and hardly visible. Not much of the body is visible out of the water. Found in small groups, but sometimes hundreds to thousands during annual migrations. Habitat: Found in open water year-round. Prefer shallow coastal water during summer and water near pack ice in winter. Killer Whale Status: Endangered Length: 8-9 m Appearance: Black body with white throat, belly and underside and white spot behind eye. Triangular dorsal fin in the middle of the back. Male dorsal fin can be up to 2 m in high. Behaviour: Blow is tall and column shaped; approximately 4 m in height. Narwhal Typically form groups of 2-25. Length: 4-5 m Habitat: Coastal water and open seas, often in water less than 200 m depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Title First Records of the Snailfish Careproctus Lycopersicus (Cottoidei
    First Records of the Snailfish Careproctus lycopersicus Title (Cottoidei: Liparidae) from the Western North Pacific Author(s) Kai, Yoshiaki; Matsuzaki, Koji; Mori, Toshiaki Citation Species Diversity (2019), 24(2): 115-118 Issue Date 2019-07-25 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/253532 © 2019 The Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology; 許諾条 Right 件に基づいて掲載しています。 Type Journal Article Textversion publisher Kyoto University Species Diversity 24: 115–118 Published online 25 July 2019 DOI: 10.12782/specdiv.24.115 First Records of the Snailfish Careproctus lycopersicus (Cottoidei: Liparidae) from the Western North Pacific Yoshiaki Kai1,3, Koji Matsuzaki2, and Toshiaki Mori2 1 Maizuru Fisheries Research Station, Field Science Education and Research Center, Kyoto University, Nagahama, Maizuru, Kyoto 625-0086, Japan E-mail: [email protected] 2 Marine Science Museum, Fukushima (Aquamarine Fukushima), Onahama, Iwaki, Fukushima 971-8101, Japan 3 Corresponding author (Received 8 March 2019; Accepted 14 May 2019) Four specimens (168.6–204.4 mm standard length) of Careproctus lycopersicus Orr, 2012, previously recorded from the Bering Sea and eastern Aleutian Islands, were collected from the southern Sea of Okhotsk (the Nemuro Strait, eastern Hokkaido, Japan). These specimens represent the first records of the species from the western North Pacific. A detailed description is provided for the specimens, including the intraspecific variations. The new standard Japanese name “Tomato- kon’nyaku-uo” is proposed for the species. Key Words: Teleostei, Actinopterygii, Sea of Okhotsk, Japan, distribution. Introduction Materials and Methods Snailfishes of the family Liparidae Scopoli, 1777 compose Counts, measurements, and descriptive terminology fol- a large and diverse group in the suborder Cottoidei, hav- low Orr and Maslenikov (2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Snailfish Genus Allocareproctus (Teleostei
    Zootaxa 1173: 1–37 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1173 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Revision of the snailfish genus Allocareproctus Pitruk & Fedorov (Teleostei: Liparidae), with descriptions of four new species from the Aleutian Islands JAMES WILDER ORR1 & MORGAN SCOTT BUSBY2 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Sci- ence Center, Resource Assessment and Conservation Engineering Division, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Build- ing 4, Seattle, WA 98115, U.S.A; E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Table of contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Method and materials ........................................................................................................................ 3 Systematic accounts .......................................................................................................................... 4 Allocareproctus Pitruk & Fedorov 1993 .................................................................................... 4 Key to species of Allocareproctus ............................................................................................13 Allocareproctus jordani (Burke 1930) .....................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Global Patterns in Marine Mammal Distributions
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I. TAXONOMIC DECISIONS In this work we followed Wilson and Reeder (2005) and Reeves, Stewart, and Clapham’s (2002) taxonomy. In the last 20 years several new species have been described such as Mesoplodon perrini (Dalebout 2002), Orcaella heinsohni (Beasley 2005), and the recognition of several species have been proposed for orcas (Perrin 1982, Pitman et al. 2007), Bryde's whales (Kanda et al. 2007), Blue whales (Garrigue et al. 2003, Ichihara 1996), Tucuxi dolphin (Cunha et al. 2005, Caballero et al. 2008), and other marine mammals. Since we used the conservation status of all species following IUCN (2011), this work is based on species recognized by this IUCN to keep a standardized baseline. II. SPECIES LIST List of the species included in this paper, indicating their conservation status according to IUCN (2010.4) and its range area. Order Family Species IUCN 2010 Freshwater Range area km2 Enhydra lutris EN A2abe 1,084,750,000,000 Mustelidae Lontra felina EN A3cd 996,197,000,000 Odobenidae Odobenus rosmarus DD 5,367,060,000,000 Arctocephalus australis LC 1,674,290,000,000 Arctocephalus forsteri LC 1,823,240,000,000 Arctocephalus galapagoensis EN A2a 167,512,000,000 Arctocephalus gazella LC 39,155,300,000,000 Arctocephalus philippii NT 163,932,000,000 Arctocephalus pusillus LC 1,705,430,000,000 Arctocephalus townsendi NT 1,045,950,000,000 Carnivora Otariidae Arctocephalus tropicalis LC 39,249,100,000,000 Callorhinus ursinus VU A2b 12,935,900,000,000 Eumetopias jubatus EN A2a 3,051,310,000,000 Neophoca cinerea
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Ringed Seals (Phoca Hispida) in Western Hudson Bay, Canada
    Ecology of ringed seals (Phoca hispida) in western Hudson Bay, Canada by Magaly Vincent-Chambellant A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Biological Sciences University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2010 by Magaly Vincent-Chambellant Abstract Recently, Hudson Bay experienced unidirectional trends in temperature, sea-ice extent, time of break-up, and length of the open-water season. Predicted impacts on population dynamics of ice-associated species include habitat loss and shift in prey availability. The ringed seal (Phoca hispida) depends on a stable ice platform with sufficient snow depth and a productive open-water season for reproduction and survival. Evidence of ringed seal sensitivity to environmental variations has been reported, but mechanisms involved were poorly understood. In western Hudson Bay, density, life-history traits, and diet of ringed seals were monitored over two decades, providing an opportunity to understand the effects of climatic variations on the population dynamics of this long-lived carnivore. Ringed seal density was estimated through strip-transect analyses after aerial surveys were flown in western Hudson Bay in late spring during the annual moult in the 1990s and 2000s. During these periods, ringed seals were also sampled from Inuit subsistence fall harvests In Arviat, NU, and ages, reproductive status, percentage of pups in the harvest, body condition, and diet were assessed. Strong inter-annual variations in these parameters were observed, and a decadal cycle was suggested and related to variations in the sea-ice regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Terrestrial Haul-Out Behaviour by Ringed Seals
    POLAR RESEARCH, 2017 VOL. 36, 1374124 https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2017.1374124 RESEARCH ARTCLE Novel terrestrial haul-out behaviour by ringed seals (Pusa hispida)in Svalbard, in association with harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) Christian Lydersena, Jade Vaquie-Garciaa, Espen Lydersenb, Guttorm N. Christensenc & Kit M. Kovacsa aNorwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, Norway; bUniversity College of Southeast Norway, Campus Bø, Norway; cAkvaplan-Niva, Tromsø, Norway ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Ringed seals (Pusa hispida) are the most ice-associated of all Arctic pinnipeds. In the Svalbard Arctic; behavioural plasticity; area, this species has always given birth, moulted and rested on sea ice. In addition, much of climate change; glacier their food has been comprised of ice-associated prey. Recently, ringed seals have been fronts; lagoons; sea ice reported to be using terrestrial substrates as a haul-out platform in some fjords on the west coast of Spitsbergen. In many cases the seals involved are harbour seals (Phoca vitulina), which are extending their distribution into new areas within the Svalbard Archipelago and which are being misclassified as ringed seals. However, this study reports that terrestrial haul- out by ringed seals is also now taking place on rocks exposed at low tide as well as on the coastline. Recent intrusions of warm Atlantic Water (with associated prey) have extended deep into the fjords of western Spitsbergen, resulting in deteriorated ice conditions for ringed seals and expanded habitat for harbour seals. Over the last decade, ringed seals have become more and more confined in coastal areas to narrow bands in front of tidal glacier fronts where Arctic conditions still prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • The Morphology and Sculpture of Ossicles in the Cyclopteridae and Liparidae (Teleostei) of the Baltic Sea
    Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2010, 59, 4, 263–276 doi: 10.3176/earth.2010.4.03 The morphology and sculpture of ossicles in the Cyclopteridae and Liparidae (Teleostei) of the Baltic Sea Tiiu Märssa, Janek Leesb, Mark V. H. Wilsonc, Toomas Saatb and Heli Špilevb a Institute of Geology at Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia; [email protected] b Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Mäealuse Street 14, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] c Department of Biological Sciences and Laboratory for Vertebrate Paleontology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9 Canada; [email protected] Received 31 August 2009, accepted 28 June 2010 Abstract. Small to very small bones (ossicles) in one species each of the families Cyclopteridae and Liparidae (Cottiformes) of the Baltic Sea are described and for the first time illustrated with SEM images. These ossicles, mostly of dermal origin, include dermal platelets, scutes, tubercles, prickles and sensory line segments. This work was undertaken to reveal characteristics of the morphology, sculpture and ultrasculpture of these small ossicles that could be useful as additional features in taxonomy and systematics, in a manner similar to their use in fossil material. The scutes and tubercles of the cyclopterid Cyclopterus lumpus Linnaeus are built of small denticles, each having its own cavity viscerally. The thumbtack prickles of the liparid Liparis liparis (Linnaeus) have a tiny spinule on a porous basal plate; the small size of the prickles seems to be related to their occurrence in the exceptionally thin skin, to an adaptation for minimizing weight and/or metabolic cost and possibly to their evolution from isolated ctenii no longer attached to the scale plates of ctenoid scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudoliparis Swirei Sp. Nov.: a Newly-Discovered Hadal Snailfish (Scorpaeniformes: Liparidae) from the Mariana Trench
    Zootaxa 4358 (1): 161–177 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4358.1.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:84494502-9E85-49DA-8530-092AF8918D88 Pseudoliparis swirei sp. nov.: A newly-discovered hadal snailfish (Scorpaeniformes: Liparidae) from the Mariana Trench MACKENZIE E. GERRINGER1, THOMAS D. LINLEY2, ALAN J. JAMIESON2, ERICA GOETZE1 & JEFFREY C. DRAZEN1 1Dept. Of Oceanography, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, HI 96822. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2School of Marine Science and Technology, Ridley Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. NE1 7RU. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Pseudoliparis swirei sp. nov. is described from 37 individuals collected in the Mariana Trench at depths 6898–7966 m. The collection of this new species is the deepest benthic capture of a vertebrate with corroborated depth data. Here, we describe P. swirei sp. nov. and discuss aspects of its morphology, biology, distribution, and phylogenetic relationships to other hadal liparids based on analysis of three mitochondrial genes. Pseudoliparis swirei sp. nov. is almost certainly en- demic to the Mariana Trench, as other hadal liparids appear isolated to a single trench/ trench system in the Kermadec, Macquarie, South Sandwich, South Orkney, Peru-Chile, Kurile-Kamchatka and Japan trenches. The discovery of another hadal liparid species, apparently abundant at depths where other fish species are few and only found in low numbers, pro- vides further evidence for the dominance of this family among the hadal fish fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrophoretic Variation in Large Mammals. III. the Ringed Seal, Pusa-Hispida, the Harp Seal, Pagophilus-Groenlandicus, and the Hooded Seal, Cystophora-Cristata
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Biological Sciences Faculty Publications Biological Sciences 1982 Electrophoretic Variation in Large Mammals. III. The Ringed Seal, Pusa-Hispida, the Harp Seal, Pagophilus-Groenlandicus, and the Hooded Seal, Cystophora-Cristata V. Simonsen Fred W. Allendorf University of Montana - Missoula, [email protected] W. F. Eanes F. O. Kapel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/biosci_pubs Part of the Biology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Simonsen, V.; Allendorf, Fred W.; Eanes, W. F.; and Kapel, F. O., "Electrophoretic Variation in Large Mammals. III. The Ringed Seal, Pusa-Hispida, the Harp Seal, Pagophilus-Groenlandicus, and the Hooded Seal, Cystophora-Cristata" (1982). Biological Sciences Faculty Publications. 63. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/biosci_pubs/63 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hereditas 97: 87-90 (1982) Electrophoretic variation in large mammals 111. The ringed seal, Pusa hispida, the harp seal, Pagophilus groenlandicus, and the hooded seal, Cystophora cristata. V. SIMONSEN', F. W. ALLENDORF, W. F. EANES3 and F. 0. KAPEL4 ' Institute of Ecology and Genetics, University of Aarhus, Denmark Department of Zoology, University of Montana, USA ' Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, USA Greenland Fisheries Investigations, Charlottenlund, Denmark SIMONSEN, V., ALLENDORF, F. W.,EANES, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Walrus (Odobenus Rosmaurs Divergens) As a Threatened Or Endangered Species Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST THE PACIFIC WALRUS (ODOBENUS ROSMAURS DIVERGENS) AS A THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT © BILL HICKEY, USFWS CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY FEBRUARY 7, 2008 Notice of Petition____________________________________________________ Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington. D.C. 20240 Tom Melius, Regional Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Regional Office 1011 East Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503 PETITIONER The Center for Biological Diversity 1095 Market Street, Suite 511 San Francisco, CA 94103 ph: (415) 436-9682 ext 301 fax: (415) 436-9683 __________________________ Date: this 7th day of February, 2008 Shaye Wolf, Ph.D. Kassie Siegel Brendan Cummings Center for Biological Diversity Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §1533(b), Section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e), and 50 C.F.R. § 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity hereby petitions the Secretary of the Interior, through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”), to list the Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens) as a threatened or endangered species and to designate critical habitat to ensure its survival and recovery. The Center for Biological Diversity works through science, law, and policy to secure a future for all species, great or small, hovering on the brink of extinction. The Center has over 40,000 members throughout Alaska and the United States. The Center and its members are concerned with the conservation of endangered species, including the Pacific walrus, and the effective implementation of the ESA.
    [Show full text]