Calendar No. 367

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Calendar No. 367 Calendar No. 367 105TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session SENATE 105±189 "! DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999 REPORT [TO ACCOMPANY S. 2060] ON AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999 FOR MILI- TARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, TO PRE- SCRIBE PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR FOR THE ARMED FORCES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL VIEWS COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE MAY 11, 1998.ÐOrdered to be printed DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999 1 Calendar No. 367 105TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session SENATE 105±189 "! DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999 REPORT [TO ACCOMPANY S. 2060] ON AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999 FOR MILI- TARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, TO PRE- SCRIBE PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR FOR THE ARMED FORCES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL VIEWS COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE MAY 11, 1998.ÐOrdered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 48±264 WASHINGTON : 1998 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES (105th Congress, 2d Session) STROM THURMOND, South Carolina, Chairman JOHN W. WARNER, Virginia CARL LEVIN, Michigan JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts DAN COATS, Indiana JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico BOB SMITH, New Hampshire JOHN GLENN, Ohio DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Idaho ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma CHARLES S. ROBB, Virginia RICK SANTORUM, Pennsylvania JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine MAX CLELAND, Georgia PAT ROBERTS, Kansas LES BROWNLEE, Staff Director DAVID S. LYLES, Staff Director for the Minority ii C O N T E N T S Page Purpose of the Bill ................................................................................................... 1 Committee overview and recommendations .......................................................... 2 Explanation of funding summary ........................................................................... 3 Division AÐDepartment of Defense Authorizations ............................................ 13 Title IÐProcurement ............................................................................................... 13 Explanation of tables ....................................................................................... 15 Subtitle AÐAuthorization of Appropriations ................................................. 16 Sec. 107. Chemical Demilitarization Program ....................................... 18 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) ............................................ 18 Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Project (CSEPP) .... 19 Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) ...................................... 19 Subtitle BÐArmy Programs ............................................................................ 20 Sec. 111. Multiyear procurement authority for Longbow Hellfire mis- sile program ........................................................................................... 41 Sec. 113. Armored system modernization ............................................... 41 Sec. 114. Reactive armor tiles ................................................................. 42 Sec. 116. Extension of authority to carry out Armament Retooling and Manufacturing Support Initiative ................................................. 43 Other Army Programs ...................................................................................... 43 Army Aircraft ............................................................................................ 43 UC±35 ................................................................................................. 43 UH±60 blackhawk .............................................................................. 43 C±12 Flight Maintenance System ..................................................... 43 Longbow .............................................................................................. 44 Army Missile .............................................................................................. 44 Enhanced fiber optic guided missile ................................................. 44 Multiple launch rocket system rocket .............................................. 44 Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles .................................................. 45 Small arms programs ......................................................................... 45 Army Ammunition ..................................................................................... 45 Small arms ammunition .................................................................... 45 M919 25mm ammunition .................................................................. 45 M830A1 tank ammunition ................................................................ 46 Other Army Procurement ......................................................................... 46 High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicle ................................... 46 Family of medium tactical vehicles .................................................. 46 Medium truck extended service program ......................................... 47 Project management support ............................................................ 47 System fielding support ..................................................................... 48 Army data distribution system ......................................................... 48 Single channel ground and airborne radio system family .............. 48 Area common user system modernization program ........................ 48 Night vision equipment ..................................................................... 48 Multiple integrated laser engagement system 2000 ....................... 49 Subtitle CÐNavy Programs ............................................................................ 50 Sec. 121. CVN±77 nuclear aircraft carrier program .............................. 76 Sec. 122. Increased amount to be excluded from cost limitation for Seawolf submarine program ................................................................. 76 Sec. 123. Multiyear procurement authority for the medium tactical vehicle replacement ............................................................................... 77 Other Navy Programs ...................................................................................... 77 Navy Aircraft ............................................................................................. 77 F±14 pods ............................................................................................ 77 AH±1W series ..................................................................................... 77 (III) IV Page Title IÐProcurementÐContinued Other Navy ProgramsÐContinued Navy AircraftÐContinued EP±3 spares ........................................................................................ 77 P±3C antisurface warfare improvement program ........................... 78 Navy Weapons ........................................................................................... 78 Penguin missile program ................................................................... 78 Improved tactical air launched decoy ............................................... 78 Close-in weapon system surface mode upgrade ............................... 79 Surface ship gun mount rotatable pool ............................................ 79 Navy and Marine Corps Ammunition ..................................................... 80 Marine Corps ammunition ................................................................ 80 Navy Shipbuilding and Conversion ......................................................... 80 LHD±8 advance procurement ............................................................ 80 Strategic sealift .................................................................................. 81 Landing craft air cusioned service life extension ............................ 81 Other Navy Procurement .......................................................................... 81 AN/WSN±7 inertial navigation system ............................................ 81 AN/BPS±15H surface search radar .................................................. 81 Submarine acoustic rapid commercial off-the-shelf insertion ........ 82 Integration and test facility command and control initiative ......... 82 Information Technology±21 ............................................................... 82 Submarine connectivity ..................................................................... 83 Joint Engineering Data Management and Information Control System ............................................................................................. 84 Aviation life support .......................................................................... 84 AEGIS support equipment ................................................................ 84 Smart ship equipment ....................................................................... 84 NULKA assembly qualification ......................................................... 85 Marine Corps Procurement ...................................................................... 85 Modification kits for tracked vehicles ............................................... 85 Avenger ............................................................................................... 85 Night vision equipment ..................................................................... 85 Communications
Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 Be It Enacted Hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the ^^"'^'/Or^ C ^ United States Of
    324 PUBLIC LAW 161-JULY 15, 1955 [69 STAT. Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 July 15.1955 AN ACT THa R 68291 *• * To authorize certain construction at inilitai-y, naval, and Air F<n"ce installations, and for otlier purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the an^^"'^'/ord Air Forc^e conc^> United States of America in Congress assembled^ struction TITLE I ^'"^" SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army is authorized to establish or develop military installations and facilities by the acquisition, con­ struction, conversion, rehabilitation, or installation of permanent or temporary public works in respect of the following projects, which include site preparation, appurtenances, and related utilities and equipment: CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES TECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Troop housing, community facilities, utilities, and family housing, $1,736,000. Black Hills Ordnance Depot, South Dakota: Family housing, $1,428,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Operational and mainte­ nance facilities, $509,000. Erie Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities and utilities, $1,933,000. Frankford Arsenal, Pennsylvania: Utilities, $855,000. LOrdstown Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities, $875,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, (^olorado: Operational and maintenance facilities, $1,843,000. Ked River Arsenal, Texas: Operational and maintenance facilities, $140,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Research and development facilities and community facilities, $2,865,000. E(.>ck Island Arsenal, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facil­ ities, $347,000. Rossford Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Utilities, $400,000. Savanna Ordnance Depot, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facilities, $342,000. Seneca Ordnance Depot, New York: Community facilities, $129,000.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • US Base Closings in Newfoundland, 1961–1994 Steven High
    Document generated on 09/29/2021 3:10 a.m. Newfoundland and Labrador Studies Farewell Stars and Stripes US Base Closings in Newfoundland, 1961–1994 Steven High Volume 32, Number 1, Spring 2017 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/nflds32_1art02 See table of contents Publisher(s) Faculty of Arts, Memorial University ISSN 1719-1726 (print) 1715-1430 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article High, S. (2017). Farewell Stars and Stripes: US Base Closings in Newfoundland, 1961–1994. Newfoundland and Labrador Studies, 32(1), 42–85. All rights reserved © Memorial University, 2017 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Farewell Stars and Stripes: US Base Closings in Newfoundland, 1961–1994 Steven High Despite a chilly wind off of Placentia Bay, thousands of people gath- ered in Argentia to watch the controlled implosion of the 10-storey Combined Bachelor Quarters, known affectionately as the “Q,” on 6 November 1999. Cars lined up bumper to bumper for eight kilometres on the only road leading to the former US Navy base on Newfound- land’s Avalon Peninsula. In anticipation, the organizers had prepared a designated viewing area, a bandstand, a first aid station, and conces- sion stands where visitors could purchase their “Implosion ’99” t-shirts.
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal, July-August 2012, Volume 26, No. 4
    July–August 2012 Volume 26, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 International Feature Embracing the Moon in the Sky or Fishing the Moon in the Water? ❙ 4 Some Thoughts on Military Deterrence: Its Effectiveness and Limitations Sr Col Xu Weidi, Research Fellow, Institute for Strategic Studies, National Defense University, People’s Liberation Army, China Features Toward a Superior Promotion System ❙ 24 Maj Kyle Byard, USAF, Retired Ben Malisow Col Martin E. B. France, USAF KWar ❙ 45 Cyber and Epistemological Warfare—Winning the Knowledge War by Rethinking Command and Control Mark Ashley From the Air ❙ 61 Rediscovering Our Raison D’être Dr. Adam B. Lowther Dr. John F. Farrell Departments 103 ❙ Views The Importance of Airpower in Supporting Irregular Warfare in Afghanistan ....................................... 103 Col Bernie Willi, USAF Whither the Leading Expeditionary Western Air Powers in the Twenty-First Century? .................................. 118 Group Capt Tim D. Q. Below, Royal Air Force Exchanging Business Cards: The Impact of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 on Domestic Disaster Response ........ 124 Col John L. Conway III, USAF, Retired 129 ❙ Historical Highlight Air Officer’s Education Captain Robert O’Brien 149 ❙ Ricochets & Replies 161 ❙ Book Reviews Stopping Mass Killings in Africa: Genocide, Airpower, and Intervention . .161 Douglas C. Peifer, PhD, ed. Reviewer: 2d Lt Morgan Bennett Truth, Lies, and O-Rings: Inside the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster . 164 Allan J. McDonald with James R. Hansen Reviewer: Mel Staffeld Allies against the Rising Sun: The United States, the British Nations, and the Defeat of Imperial Japan . 165 Nicholas Evan Sarantakes Reviewer: Lt Col John L. Minney, Alabama Air National Guard Rivals: How the Power Struggle between China, India, and Japan Will Shape Our Next Decade .
    [Show full text]
  • Red Cliff Museum Enhancement Project a Collection O/Interviews, Research, Pictures and Stories
    Red Cliff Museum Enhancement Project A collection o/Interviews, Research, Pictures and Stories Table of Contents 1.0 Background Information/Summaries 1.1 Red Clitf - American Radar Station 1951-1962 1.2 The American Connection of Red Cliff on our Town 2.0 Interview Reports and Consent Forms: 2.1 Lannis Huckabee 2.2 Jeremiah Pahukula 2.3 Norvell and Alice Simpson 2.4 Jay Stephens 2.5 Paul Winterson 3.0 Stories 3.1 All's Fair in Love and War 3.2 How I met my wife 3.3 My First Day at Red Cliff 3.4 On Duty? or On Air? 4.0 Red Cliff Questionnaires 4.1 Summary of respondents 4.2 Original copies of completed questionnaires 5.0 Pictures 5. I Present day (2007) Red CI i ff 6.0 Miscellaneous/Appendix 6.1 Picture of a USAF Squadron Emblem 6.2 Open House Poster 6.3 Emails 7.0 Sources of Research 7.1 "US Military Locations" 7.2 "St. John's (Red Clift), NF" 7.3 "Pinetreeline Miscellaneous" 7.4 "Memories of Red Clift" 7.5 "Life Goes On" Red Cliff American Radar Station 1951-1962 Construction of the American Air Force radar station at Red Cliff began in 1951. The station became operational in 1954. The facility was one of a series of AAF radar stations called the Pine Tree Line. The Pine Tree Line included radar stations across North America and as far as Greenland, and its purpose was to be a defense system against enemy aircraft during the Cold War.
    [Show full text]
  • 89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94Th Congress an Act Uct
    89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94th Congress An Act Uct. /, 1975^ rpQ authorize certain construction at military installations, and for other purposes. [S. 1247] Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Military United States of America in Congress assenibled^ construction and guard and reserve TITLE I—ARMY forces facilities authorization acts, 1976. SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop mili­ Military tary installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, converting, Construction rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, Authorization including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, Act, 1976. and equipment for the following acquisition and construction: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Defense Support Activity (Fargo Building), Boston, Massachu­ setts, $8,000,000. Fort Bragg, North Carolina. $13,214,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $13,680,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $10,732,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $46,281,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $870,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $31,861,000. Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, $2,892,000. Fort Ord, California, $32,209,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $54,361,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $1,685,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $14,879,000. Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Airfield, Georgia, $39,480,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort Benning, Georgia, $44,212,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia, $633,000. Fort Gordon, Georgia, $6,945,000. Fort Jackson, South Carolina, $14,546,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky, $42,898,000. Fort Lee, Virginia, $719,000. Fort McClellan, Alabama, $41,090,000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defense Base Closure Realignment Commission
    DCN 476 THE DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION CONGRESSIONAL HEARING WASHINGTON, DC MONDAY, JUNE 12,1995 ROOM 345 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT CONGRESSIONAL HEARING ROOM 345 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING TABLE OF CONTENTS Monday, June 13,1995 Tiu3 1. 1LASTER SCHEDULE -.7 YEW ,tZEAYICO 3. SOUTH C.AROLIXA 8. COLORADO C w9*COh?YECTICuT 10. FLORIDA 12. GUAM 13. .ILLINOIS 16. MAINE 17. NEW HA,WSRIRE - ., 21- - , MINNESOTA THE DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMlSSlON 1700 NORTH MOORE STREET SUITE 1425 ARLINGTON, VA 22209 703-696-0504 ALAN J. DIXON, CHAIRMAN COMMISSIONERS: AL CORNELLA REBECCA COX GEN J. B. DAVIS, USAF (RET) S. LEE KLlNG RADM BENJAMIN F. MONTOYA, USN (RET) MG JOSUE ROBLES. JR., USA (RE-T) WEND1 LOUISE STEELE OPENING STATEMENT CHAIRMAN ALAN J. DIXON HEARING TO RECEIVE CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY Washington, DC June 13,1995 GOOD MORNING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, AND WELCOME TO TODAY'S HEARING OF THE DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT COMMISSION. MY NAME IS ALAN J. DIXON AND I AM CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMISSION. WITH US TODAY ARE MY COLLEAGUES, COMMISSIONERS AL CORNELLA, REBECCA COX, S. LEE KLING, JOE ROBLES, AND WEND1 STEELE. OTHER COMMISSIONERS WILL BE COMING A LITTLE LATER AS MOST OF YOU KNOW, THIS COMMISSION IS HEADING INTO THE FINAL THREE WEEKS OF ITS DIFFICULT AND UNPLEASANT TASK OF ql RECOMMENDING TO THE PRESIDENT WHICH DOMESTIC MILITARY BASES SHOULD BE CLOSED OR REALIGNED. SINCE WE RECEIVED THE CLOSURE LIST FROM SECRETARY PERRY 15 WEEKS AGO, THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE HELD TEN HEARINGS HERE IN WASHINGTON, 16 REGIONAL HEARINGS AROUND THE COUNTRY, AND MADE ALMOST 200 VISITS TO SOME 75 MILITARY BASES.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact Analysis of Delayed Military Base Reuse in California
    Economic & Planning Systems Real Estate Economics Regional Economics Public Finance Land Use Policy WHITE PAPER ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF DELAYED MILITARY BASE REUSE IN CALIFORNIA Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. January 2007 Update EPS #17002 B E R K E L E Y S A C R A M E N T O D E N V E R 2501 Ninth St., Suite 200 Phone: 510-841-9190 Phone: 916-649-8010 Phone: 303-623-3557 Berkeley, CA 94710-2515 Fax: 510-841-9208 Fax: 916-649-2070 Fax: 303-623-9049 www.epsys.com TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS...........................................................1 Summary of Findings...............................................................................................1 II. ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF DELAYED REUSE ..................................................7 Economic Impact Analysis.......................................................................................8 Economic Development Impacts.......................................................................9 Fiscal Impacts....................................................................................................10 III. REFERENCES .............................................................................................................12 APPENDICES Appendix A: Economic Impact Analysis of Alameda Naval Air Station Appendix B: Economic Impact Analysis of Fort Ord Military Installation Appendix C: Economic Impact Analysis of Hunter’s Point Naval Shipyard Appendix D: Economic Impact Analysis of Naval Station Treasure Island
    [Show full text]
  • House' of Representatives
    6132 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- HOUSE Ap1"il 16 jobs one at a t~e. This is so for these send the restricted bill without delay to sented to the ·President of tlie United reasons: the Hguse, whose concurrence in the States the following-enrolled bills: First. Malpractices in the internal af­ action of the Senate would make it rea­ S. 144. An act to modify Reorganization fairs of unionS and problems arising out sonably certain that union treasuries Plan No. II of 1939 and Reorganization Plan of the external relations of industry and will not be pillaged with impunity by No. 2 of 1953; and · labor are quite dissimilar in nature, and their custodians, that unrepentant con­ S. 1096. An act to authorize appropriations require quite different legislative treat­ victed felons and racketeers will not be to the National Aeronautics and Space Ad­ ment. To combine the· consideration of given dominion over honest and law­ ministration for salari-es and expenses, re­ such diverse matters is not conducive to search and development, construction and abiding union members, that dictatorial equipment, and for other purposes, sound legislation because it tends to con­ union officers will not be allowed to rob fuse issues and distract legislators. union members of their basic rights by Second. The passage of needed legis-. abuse of the trustee process, that cor­ REC~SS lation to outlaw malpractices in the in.; rupt union officers will not be permitted The PRESIDING OFFICER. What is ternal affairs of unions ought not to oe to connive with management to betray· put in jeopardy by saddling such legisla­ the union members they represent, and the wish of the Senate? tion with unrelated controversies be­ that union members will possess the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES Loan Act of 1933, As Amended; Making Appropriations for the Depart­ S
    1955 .CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE 9249 ment of the Senate to the bill CH. R. ministering oaths and taking acknowledg­ Keller in ·behalf of physically handicapped 4904) to extend the Renegotiation Act ments by offi.cials of Federal penal and cor­ persons throughout ·the world. of 1951for2 years, and requesting a con­ rectional institutions; and H. R. 4954. An act to amend the Clayton The message also announced that the ference with the Senate on the disagree­ Act by granting a right of action to the Senate agrees to the amendments of the ing votes·of the two Houses thereon. United States to recover damages under the House to a joint resolution of the Sen­ Mr. BYRD. I move that the Senate antitrust laws, establishing a uniform ate of the following title: insist upon its amendment, agree to the statute of limitati9ns, and for other purposes. request of the House for a conference, S. J. Res. 67. Joint resolution to authorize The message also announced that the the Secretary of Commerce to sell certain and ~hat the Chair appoint the conferees Senate had passed bills and a concur­ vessels to citizens of the Republic of the on the part of the Senate. Philippines; to provide for the rehabilita­ The motion was agreed to; and the rent resolution of the following titles, in tion of the interisland commerce of the Acting President pro tempore appointed which the concurrence of the House is Philippines, and for other purposes. Mr. BYRD, Mr. GEORGE, Mr. KERR, Mr. requested: The message also announced that th~ MILLIKIN, and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Naval Weather Service Association Reunion 10 – 14 September, 2008 Waukesha, Wi
    (847) 438-4716 [email protected] Chaplain: CWO4 Bill Bowers, USN RET (352) 750-2970 [email protected] Finance: CAPT Bob Titus, USN RET (Chair) (775) 345-1949 [email protected] CAPT Dave Sokol, USN RET CAPT Chuck Steinbruck, USN RET Historian: CDR Don Cruse, USN RET (703) 524-9067 [email protected] Scholarship: AGCM Pat O’Brien, USN RET (Chair) (850) 968-0552 [email protected] xAG3 Charles E Moffett III, USN REL (609) 492-2883 [email protected] LCDR Mike Gilroy, USN RET (425) 418-8164 [email protected] Nominating: AGCM Moon Mullen, USN RET (805) 496-1348 [email protected] Parliamentary: AGCM Moon Mullen, USN RET (805) 496-1348 [email protected] Master-At-Arms: AGC Dan Hewins, USN RET COVER INFORMATION. This cover was inspired by an email between Frank Baillie and Frenchy Corbeille. From Frank Baillie: I was a young AG1 aboard USS Eldorado which arrived in Yokosuka in late 1952 with Phib Gru 3embarked. We tied up at a finger pier adjacent to the carrier pier. On an earlier Yokosuka port visit in USS Estes (1951) a carrier had arrived in port & used the Association Officers: "Pinwheel" maneuver to dock. The roar of all those President: AGCM Pat O’Brien, USN RET engines was deafening. 515 Ashley Rd., Cantonment FL 32533-0552 (850) 968-0552 [email protected] The Bridges at Toko-Ri - the rest of the story! 1st Vice President: CWO4 Bill Bowers, USN RET CAPT Paul N. Gray, USN, Ret, USNA '41, 5416 Grove Manor, Lady Lake FL32159-3533 former CO of VF-54 352 750-2970 [email protected] Forward by Carl Schneider 2nd Vice President: LCDR Earl Kerr, USN RET Having flown 100 combat missions during the brutally cold 386 Deception Rd., Anacortes WA 98221-9740 winter of 1950-51 in Korea on the same type of sorties as 360 293-5835 [email protected] those described---I can readily understand the situation.
    [Show full text]